There was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. The x-axis was erroneously cut off. The corrected Figure 1 appears below:
Figure 1

Distribution of English argumentative essay scores.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Statements
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
L2 argumentative writing, evidence use, framing evidence, supporting evidence, proficiency differences, source-based writing, mixed methods, assessment
Citation
Yang R (2026) Correction: Framing vs. supporting evidence in L2 argumentative writing: a mixed-methods study of Chinese EFL learners. Front. Psychol. 17:1782179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1782179
Received
06 January 2026
Accepted
08 January 2026
Published
28 January 2026
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
17 - 2026
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Yang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rui Yang, yangrui@ahstu.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.