Abstract
Background: It is often advised to ensure a high-protein intake during energy-restricted diets. However, it is unclear whether a high-protein intake is able to maintain muscle mass and contractility in the absence of resistance training.
Materials and Methods: After 1 week of body mass maintenance (45 kcal/kg), 28 male college students not performing resistance training were randomized to either the energy-restricted (ER, 30 kcal/kg, n = 14) or the eucaloric control group (CG, 45 kcal/kg, n = 14) for 6 weeks. Both groups had their protein intake matched at 2.8 g/kg fat-free-mass and continued their habitual training throughout the study. Body composition was assessed weekly using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Contractile properties of the m. rectus femoris were examined with Tensiomyography and MyotonPRO at weeks 1, 3, and 5 along with sleep (PSQI) and mood (POMS).
Results: The ER group revealed greater reductions in body mass (Δ −3.22 kg vs. Δ 1.90 kg, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.360), lean body mass (Δ −1.49 kg vs. Δ 0.68 kg, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.152), body cell mass (Δ −0.85 kg vs. Δ 0.59 kg, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.181), intracellular water (Δ −0.58 l vs. Δ 0.55 l, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.445) and body fat percentage (Δ −1.74% vs. Δ 1.22%, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 433) compared to the CG. Contractile properties, sleep onset, sleep duration as well as depression, fatigue and hostility did not change (p > 0.05). The PSQI score (Δ −1.43 vs. Δ −0.64, p = 0.006, partial η2 = 0.176) and vigor (Δ −2.79 vs. Δ −4.71, p = 0.040, partial η2 = 0.116) decreased significantly in the ER group and the CG, respectively.
Discussion: The present data show that a high-protein intake alone was not able to prevent lean mass loss associated with a 6-week moderate energy restriction in college students. Notably, it is unknown whether protein intake at 2.8 g/kg fat-free-mass prevented larger decreases in lean body mass. Muscle contractility was not negatively altered by this form of energy restriction. Sleep quality improved in both groups. Whether these advantages are due to the high-protein intake cannot be clarified and warrants further study. Although vigor was negatively affected in both groups, other mood parameters did not change.
Introduction
During voluntary weight loss, as much lean body mass as possible should be maintained (Artioli et al., ). This, referred to as high-quality weight loss (Churchward-Venne et al., ), leads to a better power-to-mass ratio (O'Connor et al., ; Turocy et al., 2011), improves efficiency of movement (Sundgot-Borgen and Garthe, 2011), and increases the likelihood of athletic success (Slater et al., 2005; Chappell et al., ). However, following low energy availability, muscle protein synthesis is reduced leading to a negative net protein balance, and thus, finally culminates in muscle mass loss (Carbone et al., ; Pasiakos et al., ). In this context, it has been suggested that higher protein intake (2.4 vs. 1.2 g/kg) might restore muscle protein synthesis (Longland et al., ; Macnaughton et al., ) due to amino acids being preferentially used for muscle protein synthesis instead of gluconeogenesis (Walberg et al., 1988; Wackerhage and Rennie, 2006), with a concomitant decrease in protein breakdown (Kim et al., ; Park et al., ). Greater amino acid availability results in a more pronounced positive protein balance (Pikosky et al., ; Gwin et al., ), leads to a muscle sparing effect and is, therefore, recommended as an efficient strategy to increase the likelihood of lean mass retention (Phillips, , ; Manore, ; Murphy et al., ; Witard et al., 2019).
Various studies examining the impact of energy restriction in active individuals have been conducted (Karila et al., ; Pikosky et al., ; Morton et al., ; Wilson et al., 2012; Pasiakos et al., ; Rhyu and Cho, ; Huovinen et al., ). While most of the studies revealed that energy restriction was associated with a significant lean body mass loss (Karila et al., ; Pikosky et al., ; Morton et al., ; Pasiakos et al., ; Rhyu and Cho, ), ranging from 34% (~-1200 kcal/day; Morton et al., ) to 84% (~-2500 kcal/day; Karila et al., ) of the total mass lost per week, some studies reported no significant lean body mass change during energy restriction (Huovinen et al., ; Wilson et al., 2015). Since all of these studies differ in total energy deficit, protein intake, sleep duration, baseline body fat, and type of physical activity performed, which are all known to significantly influence lean body mass change (Heymsfield et al., ), the exact reasons for the inherent inter-study differences remain unclear. Although higher protein intake during energy deficit may lead to a more favorable lean body mass sparing when compared to lower intakes (Pikosky et al., ; Mettler et al., ; Wilson et al., 2015; Hudson et al., ), it is currently unclear whether a moderately energy-restricted high-protein diet alone is a sufficient stimulus to maintain lean body mass and muscle contractile properties in male college students in the absence of resistance training. Although rapid weight loss procedures have been shown to negatively affect neuromuscular performance (Zubac et al., 2020), a moderate energy restriction may elicit performance-enhancing effects (Pons et al., ).
Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to investigate whether a high-protein moderately energy-restricted diet can preserve lean body mass in college students in the absence of resistance training. Furthermore, we investigated if muscle contractility can be preserved during this type of energy restriction. Based on currently available evidence, we hypothesized that a) a high-protein moderately energy-restricted diet is able to preserve the lean body mass even in the absence of resistance training and b) contractile properties are not negatively altered throughout the study. In an attempt to clarify the observed inter-study differences, this study aimed to tightly assess moderator variables affecting lean body mass change (protein intake, sleep duration, body fat, physical activity). Since the majority of previously conducted studies only used pre-post measurements, no precise conclusion can be drawn regarding the time course of lean body mass change. Hence, this study used weekly body composition measurements which have been previously described solely for overweight and obese individuals (Heymsfield et al., ).
Materials and Methods
Study Design
The two group, parallel research design was adapted from Mettler et al. () and Philpott et al. () and is illustrated in Figure 1. Once the participants were pair-matched using the variable muscle mass divided by body mass, they were randomly assigned (randomizer.org) to either the energy restriction group (ER, n = 14) or the eucaloric control group (CG, n = 14). The study protocol consisted of 1 week under eucaloric conditions (45 kcal/kg) for both groups followed by a 6-week intervention period in which the ER group only consumed 30 kcal/kg. The CG maintained their energy intake. Protein consumption was at 2.8 g/kg fat-free-mass (FFM) for both groups during the whole study period. While body composition was assessed weekly via multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA), contractile function (Tensiomyography and MyotonPRO), sleep status, and mood were measured in weeks 1, 3, and 5.
Figure 1
The study was approved by the local ethics committee (#2019-24, Goethe University Frankfurt, GER), was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards set by the declaration of Helsinki with its recent modification of Fortaleza (Brazil, October 2013), and met the ethical standards in sport and exercise science according to Harriss and Atkinson (). Moreover, the study was preregistered in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO) with the registration number DRKS00017263.
Participants
An a priori power analysis was conducted using G*Power 3.1 (University Düsseldorf, Germany). The analysis determined that 28 participants were needed for a power of 0.80, with an effect size of f = 0.22 and an α = 0.05. Given the fact that lean mass change differs between 0% (Huovinen et al., ), 30% (Morton et al., ), and up to 84% of the lost mass per week (Karila et al., ), no exact effect size calculation was possible. Therefore, we statistically calculated with 30% lean body mass loss and assumed a moderate effect. Accounting for MFBIA precision error and individual variability in lean body mass loss, we further lowered the effect size to detect possible lean mass alterations.
Thirty-five healthy males with no experience in resistance training, as assessed by a pre-study questionnaire, were recruited from local sports clubs and university courses (see Figure 2). One participant declined to participate and three participants were excluded due to lacking protocol compliance (did not adhere to dietary intake). Finally, 28 healthy males (ER: age 26.57 ± 4.20 years; height 1.83 ± 0.05 m; body mass 82.26 ± 8.18 kg; CG: age 25.29 ± 2.97 years; height 1.81 ± 0.09 m; body mass 79.19 ± 6.43 kg) were used for data analysis. Due to hormonal fluctuations (Cumberledge et al., ), only male participants were included in order to increase reliability. The participants, who all reported that anabolic-androgenic drugs have never been consumed before, undertook at least two sport sessions per week. Since we only aimed for including lean participants, participants were excluded if their body fat was above 25%; this is the cut-off value for obesity, as suggested by Beals et al. (). During the study, the participants were asked to continue their habitual training. All participants were informed about the goal of the study as well as its conduction; in particular, interventional strains and requirements were highlighted. Every individual voluntarily agreed and gave written and informed consent to participate in the study.
Figure 2
Diet and Exercise
On each day during the study, all participants provided self-reported dietary intakes (energy, protein, carbohydrates and fats) using a smartphone app (MyFitnessPal®) as well as their daily body mass. For the latter, participants reported to the nearest 0.1 kg on their own digital scales wearing only underwear. The use of mobile apps for dietary self-reporting is considered to be reliable (Evenepoel et al., ). Every subject had either previously used this mobile app or was instructed and taught in a separate one-day workshop given by our lab, as suggested by Capling et al. (). In order to increase the compliance rate, the participants received cooking recipes and links to adequate webpages.
In the first week of the study (week 0), both groups had to match an energy intake of 45 kcal/kg. Since our participants reported to be highly active, we decided to stay slightly above the current recommendations of 45 kcal/kg FFM (Economos et al., ; Koehler et al., ). At the beginning of the intervention period, the ER group decreased their energy to 30 kcal/kg for 6 weeks to induce a moderate energy deficit (Chappell et al., ). For data analysis, energy availability was calculated as recommended (Heikura et al., ). Protein consumption was controlled during the maintenance and the intervention phase for both groups and was set at 2.8 g/kg FFM (Helms et al., ; Hector and Phillips, ; Witard et al., 2019). Due to (1) the anabolic effect of protein on muscle protein synthesis, as well as (2) a potential adaptation effect to higher protein intakes with a subsequent increased risk of protein catabolism (Millward, ), we aimed for the higher end of the current protein recommendations (Murphy et al., ; Bandegan et al., ). The remaining energy was individually distributed to carbohydrates and fats as preferred by the participants. Every type of consumed food and drinks (in g and ml respectively) had to be tracked in the nutritional diary. Supplements could be consumed ad libitum; however, the participants were asked to abstain from creatine. Compliance was checked weekly by screening all submitted protocols. If unclarities appeared (e.g., protein intake was too low), we kindly asked the participant to improve this issue during the following days. Participants were encouraged to honestly report any non-compliance.
All participants continued their habitual exercise throughout the study. Moreover, the participants provided a self-reported exercise diary on a daily basis as described (Lee et al., ). Since resistance training was prohibited during the study, all types of other sports were allowed. The participants were asked to provide sport-specific information for each training session including subjective intensity of the training as well as training duration. Baseline characteristics (week 0) are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
| ER | CG | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 26.57 ± 4.20 | 25.29 ± 2.97 | 0.358 |
| Height (m) | 1.83 ± 0.05 | 1.81 ± 0.09 | 0.836 |
| Body mass (kg) | 82.24 ± 8.18 | 79.19 ± 6.43 | 0.328 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.68 ± 2.19 | 24.55 ± 2.54 | 0.890 |
| Physical activity (minutes/week) | 403.27 ± 292.30 | 389.00 ± 232.03 | 0.907 |
| Lean mass (kg) | 65.87 ± 6.19 | 64.04 ± 5.36 | 0.451 |
| Fat mass (%) | 20.12 ± 3.90 | 19.16 ± 3.48 | 0.534 |
| Energy intake (kcal/day) | 3355.88 ± 510.67 | 3355.61 ± 332.87 | 0.999 |
| Protein intake (g/day) | 182.20 ± 25.55 | 160.10 ± 22.36 | 0.036# |
Baseline characteristics in the energy-restricted group (ER) and the control group (CG) during the maintenance week (week 0).
Indicates a significant baseline group difference (p < 0.05) during week 0 as assessed by independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test (data in means ± standard deviation).
Measurements
Body composition was assessed using MFBIA, 3-compartment model (Nutriguard-MS Vers. 2, Data-Input, Darmstadt, Germany). Examination was conducted as described in the manufacturer's manual following the ESPEN guidelines (Kyle et al., ). Briefly, two adhesive electrodes (Bianostic AT, Data-Input, Darmstadt, Germany) were placed on the dominant side of the body: the dorsal surface of the hand and foot proximal to the metacarpal-phalangeal and metatarsal-phalangeal joints. Another two electrodes were placed at the pisiform prominence of the wrist, with the proximal side covering half of the ulnar tubercle, as well as between the medial and lateral malleoli, with the proximal side covering half of the medial malleolus. The dominant side was determined by asking the participants for their dominant side and was maintained for every measurement. In this context, three frequencies (5, 50, and 100 kHz) were used at a current of 800 μA. Uncertainties of resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) given by the manufacturer were depicted as ± 1 ohm and ± 1 ohm, respectively, whilst the precision of measurement was given as 0.5% and 2.0% differing from the value, respectively.
MFBIA (whole body) was tested weekly in a supine position. The same experienced examiner carried out the standardized measurements throughout the entire study period. Participants visited the lab after an overnight fast between 8 and 11 a.m. and emptied their bladder to control for hydration status between the different measurements (Turocy et al., 2011; Bosy-Westphal and Müller, ). This was verified by extracellular/intracellular water ratio which is described as a highly sensitive indicator of hydration status change (Wang et al., 2007; Inal et al., ; Brzozowska et al., ). For instance, deviating toward 1 would suggest a water shift to the extracellular space which is indicative of water loss. Furthermore, the participants were asked to abstain from physical activity the day before testing. Following every testing, a second measurement was conducted to ensure correct values. If the values deviated by more than 3 units digit, a third measurement was conducted and the mean values were calculated. In the context of tracking body composition changes, MFBIA is considered as a reliable tool (Moon, ; Bosquet et al., ) during hypercaloric (Schoenfeld et al., 2020b) and hypocaloric conditions (Antonio et al., ) in an athletic population, producing similar values as Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in males (Golja et al., ). Moreover, MFBIA appears to be valid in detecting total body water changes (Utter et al., 2012).
Tensiomyography (TMG; TMG-BMC Ltd., Lublijana, Slovenia) was used to assess the contractile function of the m. rectus femoris (dominant side, supine position). TMG is a method to assess radial deformation of the muscle after a single electrical stimulus. Before the first measurement, the center of the anterior inferior iliac spine and the upper edge of the patella was defined, the thickest part of the muscle belly manually palpated and marked with a skin-friendly pen. Subsequently, a high-precision digital displacement sensor was applied perpendicularly to the muscle belly with a spring constant of 0.17 N mm−1 (Macgregor et al., ) and retracted into its housing by ~2 cm. If necessary, the sensor position was slightly adjusted to locate an area with the greatest amount of muscle belly to sustain an optimal point (Šimunić, 2012). In order to ensure precise inter-day reliability, we strongly encouraged the participants to redraw the marked points following water or sweat-yielding events.
Muscle twitch was induced through a single 1-ms-wide electrical stimulus with the cathode placed distal and symmetrically to the anode (Zubac et al., 2017). The electrodes (self-adhesive; dura-stick plus, 50 × 50 mm), which had an inter-electrode distance of 5 cm as suggested by Piqueras-Sanchiz et al. (), were attached on shaved skin. A Blackrole® was deposited under the dominant leg to ensure a leg angle of 120° as suggested (Paula Simola et al., ; Sánchez-Sánchez et al., 2018). In order to identify peak muscle response, we progressively increased the intensity at a 10 mA interval every 30 s, beginning with 30 mA (Lohr et al., ; Wilson et al., 2018) up until there was no further increase in the amplitude or until maximal output was reached (110 mA) as recommended by Šimunić (2012). Only the curve with the highest maximum of radial displacement was included in the analysis (García-García et al., ). In addition to the five standard TMG parameters, which include the maximal radial muscle displacement (Dm), contraction time (Tc), delay time (Td), sustain time (Ts), and half relaxation time (Tr), we calculated muscle contraction velocity (Vc) as Dm divided by the sum of Td and Tc (Loturco et al., ) multiplied by 1000 (mm/s). Relative reliability (ICC) was excellent for Dm, Tc, Vc, and Td during inter-day testing, with Tr being the least reliable parameter (Rodriguez Matoso et al., ; Šimunić, 2012; Ditroilo et al., ; Lohr et al., , ).
MyotonPRO (MMG; Myoton Ltd., Tallinn, Estonia) was used to extend the muscle quality assessment. In general, MMG is utilized to evaluate viscoelastic characteristics of skeletal muscles and other soft tissues (Aird et al., ). MMG causes a light mechanical impulse (0.15 N for 15 ms) to the relaxed muscle and records the natural oscillation of myofascial tissue by a 3-axis digital acceleration sensor sampled at 3200 Hz (Gavronski et al., ; Viir et al., 2011). From this raw data, MMG calculates the parameters of stiffness (S, N/m), logarithmic decrement (D, without unit), frequency (F, Hz), relaxation time (R, ms), and creep (C, without unit).
MMG was placed perpendicularly on the same palpated point as described in the TMG section. Per measurement, we applied three measures in multiscan mode, producing five single measures with a 1 s interval. If two of the measures were equal, this value was taken; otherwise, a mean value was calculated. If the coefficient of variation was above 3%, this measure was repeated (Lohr et al., ). Most of the studies confirmed good to excellent inter-day reliability for S, D, and F when m. rectus femoris was examined (Bizzini and Mannion, ; Zinder and Padua, 2011; Aird et al., ; Mullix et al., ). Both MMG and TMG were assessed at weeks 1, 3, and 5.
The German version of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-G) was utilized to detect possible mood changes during the study period (McNair et al., ; Bullinger et al., ). A pathopsychological state might affect training performance and, hence, may have an effect on lean mass retention (Franchini et al., ; Sundgot-Borgen et al., 2013; Stults-Kolehmainen et al., 2014). Consequently, POMS-G was assessed at weeks 1, 3, and 5. The POMS-G is a frequently-used, reliable and valid questionnaire (Albani et al., ; Grulke et al., ). In contrast to the original version (McNair et al., ), POMS-G is a short form consisting of 35 items and 4 scales (depression-anxiety, fatigue, vigor, and hostility). Each item is assessed on a 7-point Likert scale and retrospectively examines mood state during the last 24 h. Due to its similarities to the English version, our findings can also relate to studies using the English version (Kellmann and Golenia, ).
Duration of sleep (sleep onset and hours of sleep per night, assessed with a sleep diary) and subjective sleep quality (PSQI-G) were assessed daily and at weeks 1, 3, and 5, respectively. While sleep has mediating effects on testosterone production and muscle protein synthesis (Leproult and van Cauter, ; Pejovic et al., ), we aimed to clarify the effect of a high-protein energy restriction on sleep quality in healthy male college students. The PSQI is a reliable clinical sleep-behavior questionnaire which was also validated for the general population (Buysse et al., ). In contrast to the original version, the PSQI-G assesses the global sleep score in a 2 week interval (Riemann and Backhaus, ). The questionnaire contains 19 questions each using Likert scales from 0 to 3 and is categorized into seven sub-variables which are summed up to the PSQI-G score. Regarding cut-off values, scores >5 are associated with a poor sleep condition and ≤ 5 with a good sleep condition (Zhou et al., 2016). During the intervention, we used the standardized procedure as reported (Riemann and Backhaus, ).
Statistical Analysis
A general linear two-way mixed ANOVA with repeated measures [group (2) × time (3/6)] and pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni correction) was performed separately for each dependent variable (SPSS version 24.0, Chicago, IL, USA). When a significant group × time interaction was revealed or the Box's test exposed statistical significance, the simple main effects were examined separately using (a) repeated-measures ANOVA (time) and (b) univariate ANCOVA covarying for t1 (group). Before tests were calculated, the research team did an (a) visual review of boxplots, (b) test of normal distribution with the Shapiro-Wilk's test, (c) Levene's test for homogeneity of variance, (d) Box's test of equality of covariance matrices, as well as (e) Mauchly's test of sphericity. Dependent t-tests were further carried out to evaluate changes between week 0 and week 1. All tests were based on a 5% level of significance. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. When possible, effect sizes were reported.
Results
Body Composition
A significant group × time interaction was found for body mass [F(3.488,90.676) = 14.604, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.360]. The simple main effect for time revealed a significant body mass loss in the ER group [F(5,65) = 12.745, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.495] between week 1, week 5, and week 6 and a body mass gain in the CG [F(5,65) = 6.033, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.317]. Additionally, significant between-group differences were exhibited beginning at week 2 [F(1,25) = 5.156, p = 0.032, partial η2 = 0.171]. Consequently, BMI changed significantly from week 1 to week 6 (p < 0.001; Table 2).
Table 2
| Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass (kg) | ER | 82.26 ± 8.18 | 80.58 ± 8.18§ | 80.14 ± 8.85# | 79.93 ± 8.47# | 79.13 ± 8.41# | 77.92 ± 7.76# | 77.36 ± 8.00*x# | −3.22 |
| CG | 79.19 ± 6.43 | 77.49 ± 6.62 | 78.41 ± 6.34# | 79.79 ± 6.19†# | 79.37 ± 6.81# | 79.26 ± 6.58# | 79.39 ± 6.09x# | 1.90 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ER | 24.68 ± 2.19 | 24.11 ± 2.41 | 23.13 ± 2.19x# | −0.98 | ||||
| CG | 24.55 ± 2.54 | 23.71 ± 2.46 | 24.29 ± 2.45x# | 0.58 | |||||
| Lean body mass (kg) | ER | 65.87 ± 6.19 | 64.81 ± 5.89§ | 64.82 ± 6.50 | 64.98 ± 6.18# | 64.54 ± 5.85# | 63.69 ± 5.78# | 63.32 ± 5.84*x# | −1.49 |
| CG | 64.04 ± 5.36 | 63.33 ± 5.33 | 63.93 ± 5.31 | 64.94 ± 5.12†# | 64.46 ± 5.63# | 64.11 ± 4.96# | 64.01 ± 5.14# | 0.68 | |
| Body cell mass (kg) | ER | 37.92 ± 3.69 | 37.69 ± 3.80 | 37.69 ± 4.03# | 37.89 ± 3.76# | 37.41 ± 3.71# | 37.05 ± 3.72# | 36.84 ± 3.82*# | −0.85 |
| CG | 36.95 ± 3.44 | 36.66 ± 3.48 | 37.26 ± 3.71# | 37.50 ± 3.44†# | 37.32 ± 3.74# | 37.19 ± 3.49# | 37.25 ± 3.74# | 0.59 | |
| Body fat (%) | ER | 20.12 ± 3.90 | 19.44 ± 4.50 | 18.91 ± 4.56# | 18.58 ± 4.36†# | 18.24 ± 4.64# | 17.85 ± 4.39# | 17.70 ± 4.40x# | −1.74 |
| CG | 19.16 ± 3.48 | 17.96 ± 3.90 | 18.33 ± 3.87# | 18.72 ± 3.72†# | 18.74 ± 3.96# | 19.92 ± 4.14# | 19.18 ± 3.57x# | 1.22 | |
| Intracellular water (l) | ER | 28.32 ± 1.94 | 27.98 ± 1.90§ | 27.91 ± 2.03 | 28.09 ± 1.94 | 27.91 ± 1.86 | 27.65 ± 1.90# | 27.40 ± 1.96*x | −0.58 |
| CG | 27.43 ± 2.22 | 27.25 ± 2.11 | 27.49 ± 2.20 | 27.79 ± 2.07 | 27.86 ± 1.76 | 27.82 ± 1.65# | 27.80 ± 1.73 | 0.55 | |
| Extracellular water (l) | ER | 19.92 ± 2.68 | 19.47 ± 2.44 | 19.49 ± 2.74 | 19.47 ± 2.60 | 19.35 ± 2.45 | 18.99 ± 2.36 | 18.96 ± 2.38 | −0.51 |
| CG | 19.42 ± 3.12 | 19.11 ± 2.28 | 19.32 ± 2.19 | 19.71 ± 2.50 | 19.32 ± 2.39 | 19.09 ± 2.04 | 19.07 ± 2.08 | −0.04 |
Overview of body composition changes in the energy-restricted group (ER) and the control group (CG).
Indicates a significant difference between week 0 and week 1 (p < 0.05);
indicates a significant difference between week 1 and week 3 (p < 0.05);
indicates a significant difference between week 3 and week 6 (p < 0.05).
indicates a significant difference between week 1 and week 6 (p < 0.05).
indicates a significant between-group difference as shown by the simple main effect for group (p < 0.05); Δ was calculated as week 6–1.
A significant group × time interaction was found for lean body mass [F(5,130) = 4.673, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.152; Figure 3]. While lean body mass significantly declined over time in the ER group [F(5,65) = 6.181, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.332], the CG increased lean body mass [F(5,65) = 4.369, p = 0.002, partial η2 = 0.252]. For the ER group, a significant difference was solely observed between week 3 and week 6 (p = 0.002). Contrarily, between-group differences revealed statistical significance at the beginning of week 3 [F(1,25) = 6.921, p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.217]. The lean body mass change ranged from +1 kg to −5.2 kg in the ER group and, on average, accounted for 47% of the lost body mass. Hydration status as assessed by extracellular/intracellular water ratio was constant throughout the study in both groups (p > 0.05). Further MFBIA derived parameters are collated in Supplementary Table 6.
Figure 3
Similar to what has been reported for lean body mass, the body cell mass, representing the protein-rich and metabolically-active compartments of the body, showed a significant group × time interaction [F(3.190,82.951) = 5.740, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.181]. While the simple main effect for time also exhibited a significant decrease in the ER group [F(5,65) = 6.851, p = 0.003, partial η2 = 0.345] as well as a significant increase in the CG [F(5,65) = 4.078, p = 0.003, partial η2 = 0.239], between-group differences were found at the beginning of week 2 [F(1,25) = 4.871, p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.163]. Pairwise comparisons over time located the meaningful differences in the ER group between week 3, week 5 and week 6 (p < 0.05). While we did not find a group × time interaction for extracellular mass (p = 0.10), the main effect for time revealed a change in both groups [F(5,130) = 2.592, p = 0.029, partial η2 = 0.091]. However, no significant between-group differences were observed for the extracellular mass (p = 0.993).
A significant group × time interaction was seen for total body water [F(5,130) = 4.681, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.153]. The simple main effect for time revealed a significant decline in total body water in the ER group [F(5,65) = 6.093, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.319] as well as a significant increase in the CG [F(5,65) = 4.259, p = 0.002, partial η2 = 0.247], with pairwise comparisons revealing statistical meaningful differences between week 3 and week 6 in the ER group (p = 0.003). Moreover, we identified a significant between-group difference for total body water change beginning with week 4 [F(1,25) = 4.676, p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.158]. Total body water can be further divided into intracellular and extracellular water. Since both variables revealed a significant Box's test, only the simple main effects were interpreted. While the ER group showed a significant decrease of intracellular water over time [F(5,65) = 10.426, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.445], no change could be detected in the CG (p = 0.335). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences in the ER group between week 1 and week 6, week 2 and week 6, week 3, week 5 and week 6 as well as week 4 and week 6 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, significant between-group differences were found at the beginning of week 5 [F(1,25) = 5.848, p = 0.023, partial η2 = 0.190]. Similar to the extracellular mass, extracellular water decreased only in the ER group [F(5,65) = 3.160, p = 0.013, partial η2 = 0.196], but did not in the CG (p = 0.380). Herein, no between-group differences were observed (p > 0.05).
The body fat percentage showed a significant group × time interaction [F(5,130) = 19.819, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.433]. The simple main effect for time exhibited a significant decrease in the ER group [F(2.202,28.623) = 14.632, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.530] as well as a significant increase in the CG [F(2.080,27.036) = 6.287, p = 0.005, partial η2 = 0.326]. We found a significant difference in the simple main effect for group beginning with week 2 [F(1,25) = 11.036, p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.306].
Diet and Exercise
Food diary analysis showed that the participants in the ER group consumed less energy compared to the maintenance period (p < 0.001) and the CG (p < 0.001). Regarding energy and protein intake, compliance was >90% on average per group. In individual numbers, the energy intake of the ER group equated to 29.65 ± 1.63 kcal/kg with an energy availability of 31.36 ± 3.13 kcal/kg FFM, respectively (Table 3). In contrast, energy intake of the CG equated to 42.64 ± 2.57 kcal/kg with an energy availability of 48.98 ± 3.36 kcal/kg FFM. Based on Hall's formula (Hall, ), the calculated energy deficit was ~-535 kcal/day for the ER group and 316 kcal/day for the CG. Except for week 0, no significant differences were found for protein consumption (p > 0.05). Retrospectively, protein consumed was 2.77 ± 0.26 g/kg FFM for the ER group and 2.62 ± 0.33 g/kg FFM for the CG. While the ER group significantly reduced fat and carbohydrate intake between the maintenance and the intervention period (p < 0.001), significant between-group differences were spotted in the individual fat (ER: 0.95 ± 0.21 g/kg; CG: 1.45 ± 0.36 g/kg) and carbohydrate (ER: 2.89 ± 0.44 g/kg; CG: 4.79 ± 0.96 g/kg) intake throughout the study period (p < 0.001). During the study, the participants in both groups supplemented protein shakes, multivitamin supplements to avoid deficiencies, omega-3 and caffeine.
Table 3
| Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal/day) | ER | 3355.88 ± 510.67 | 2396.82 ± 248.86§# | 2386.65 ± 279.88# | 2362.62 ± 309.36# | 2372.48 ± 290.45# | 2351.33 ± 291.52# | 2382.41 ± 249.81# |
| CG | 3355.61 ± 332.87 | 3356.78 ± 333.46# | 3331.54 ± 346.68# | 3340.70 ± 386.22# | 3320.97 ± 328.05# | 3336.28 ± 344.55# | 3330.19 ± 515.20# | |
| Protein (g/day) | ER | 182.20 ± 25.55# | 180.32 ± 24.26 | 178.59 ± 26.88 | 179.44 ± 22.16 | 179.92 ± 20.03 | 180.09 ± 22.47 | 190.35 ± 22.75 |
| CG | 160.10 ± 22.36# | 166.81 ± 26.15 | 166.78 ± 24.34 | 168.88 ± 28.89 | 171.16 ± 25.66 | 172.19 ± 26.62 | 160.47 ± 31.99 | |
| Fat (g/day) | ER | 113.24 ± 25.50 | 79.22 ± 11.41§# | 75.86 ± 21.37# | 76.13 ± 23.18# | 78.30 ± 20.31# | 71.26 ± 14.92# | 71.64 ± 15.62# |
| CG | 109.12 ± 29.16 | 122.63 ± 29.29# | 119.99 ± 30.15# | 123.87 ± 38.59# | 119.04 ± 32.21# | 122.51 ± 35.93# | 104.81 ± 34.63# | |
| Carbohydrates (g/day) | ER | 383.93 ± 92.21 | 233.77 ± 34.84§# | 239.46 ± 43.76# | 230.80 ± 44.06# | 231.31 ± 39.12# | 236.45 ± 43.20# | 226.39 ± 33.86# |
| CG | 388.95 ± 88.91 | 358.33 ± 93.79# | 367.31 ± 75.96# | 352.66 ± 84.81# | 366.58 ± 71.76# | 366.60 ± 91.18# | 411.44 ± 77.61# | |
| Physical activity (minutes/week) | ER | 403.27 ± 292.30 | 343.08 ± 221.83§ | 294.17 ± 195.68 | 273.46 ± 175.55 | 255.83 ± 139.74 | 367.73 ± 342.91 | 257.62 ± 143.89 |
| CG | 389.00 ± 232.03 | 221.43 ± 178.02§ | 268.08 ± 179.66 | 317.00 ± 195.83 | 235.83 ± 147.54 | 234.62 ± 172.22 | 231.07 ± 135.49 |
Energy intake, dietary intake, and physical activity in the energy-restricted group (ER) and the control group (CG) during the study.
Significantly differed from week 0 (p < 0.05);
indicates a significant between-group difference (p < 0.05).
The participants continued their habitual training during the study. In summary, 14 different sports were practiced: gymnastics, bouldering, climbing, soccer, spikeball, bicycling, jogging, table tennis, swimming, volleyball, basketball, boxing, dancing, and paddleboarding. No significant differences in minutes of sport per week, as well as subjective intensity during training were found between the groups (p > 0.05). Training sessions per week varied for both groups between 1 and 6 sessions (ER: 4.46 ± 1.76; CG: 2.86 ± 1.29, p = 0.012).
Contractile Properties
For TMG, no significant differences were found for Ts (ER: Δ −4.82 ms; CG: Δ 16.63 ms), Tr (ER: Δ −16.65 ms; CG: Δ 16.90 ms) and Td (ER: Δ 1.28 ms; CG: Δ 0.34 ms, all p > 0.05). Although group allocation had no effect on Tc (ER: Δ 3.04 ms; CG: Δ −0.47 ms), Dm (ER: Δ 0.91 mm; CG: Δ 0.66 mm), and Vc (ER: Δ 3.84 mm/s; CG: Δ 10.85 mm/s) change, there appears to be an increasing trend in the ER group (p = 0.10) as well as in the ER and the CG (p = 0.066) for Tc and Dm over time, respectively (Figure 4; Supplementary Table 7). Lastly, Vc significantly increased to week 3 but returned to baseline at week 5.
Figure 4
For MMG, no significant differences were found for stiffness (ER: Δ −4.42 N/m; CG: Δ −4.62 N/m), decrement (ER: Δ −0.04; CG: Δ −0.01), relaxation time (ER: Δ 0.37 ms; CG: Δ 0.08 ms) and creep (ER: Δ 0.02; CG: Δ 0.00, all p > 0.05). While frequency did not change over time (ER: Δ 0.00 Hz; CG: Δ 0.04 Hz, p > 0.05), the groups differed by trend (p = 0.057). An overview of the MMG values is found in Table 4.
Table 4
| Week 1 | Week 3 | Week 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stiffness (N/m) | ER | 246.01 ± 25.20 | 243.30 ± 23.51 | 241.59 ± 26.60 |
| CG | 258.70 ± 23.15 | 252.00 ± 27.69 | 254.08 ± 27.67 | |
| Decrement | ER | 1.39 ± 0.19 | 1.41 ± 0.20 | 1.35 ± 0.22 |
| CG | 1.42 ± 0.23 | 1.37 ± 0.23 | 1.41 ± 0.30 | |
| Frequency (Hz) | ER | 13.98 ± 0.94 | 14.07 ± 0.88 | 13.98 ± 0.86 |
| CG | 14.77 ± 1.11 | 14.59 ± 1.16 | 14.81 ± 1.18 | |
| Relaxation time (ms) | ER | 21.93 ± 1.85 | 22.12 ± 1.81 | 22.30 ± 1.71 |
| CG | 21.12 ± 1.59 | 21.20 ± 1.82 | 21.20 ± 1.80 | |
| Creep | ER | 1.34 ± 0.09 | 1.35 ± 0.10 | 1.36 ± 0.10 |
| CG | 1.30 ± 0.10 | 1.30 ± 0.10 | 1.30 ± 0.10 |
Overview of the MyotonPRO analysis [energy-restricted group (ER), control group (CG)].
Sleep and Mood Analysis
No significant differences were detected for sleep in hours per night and time to fall asleep (p > 0.05). While the PSQI-G score significantly decreased over time [F(2,52) = 5.568, p = 0.006, partial η2 = 0.176], no significant differences were found between the ER group (Δ −1.43) and the CG (Δ −0.64; p = 0.247).
Profile of mood states analysis did not reveal a significant difference for depression/anxiety (ER: Δ −2.36; CG: Δ 2.50), fatigue (ER: Δ −3.43; CG: Δ 1.22), and hostility (ER: Δ −3.64; CG: Δ 1.64; all p > 0.05). However, vigor decreased significantly over time [F(2,52) = 3.417, p = 0.040, partial η2 = 0.116] with no differences between the ER group (Δ −2.79) and the CG (Δ −4.71; p = 0.583; Table 5). In this context, sleeping hours per night correlated with vigor change (r = 0.422, p = 0.025).
Table 5
| Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep per night (hours) | ER | 7.42 ± 0.87 | 7.70 ± 1.02§ | 7.71 ± 0.74 | 7.56 ± 0.63 | 7.63 ± 0.63 | 7.74 ± 0.80 | 7.67 ± 1.15 |
| CG | 7.00 ± 0.96 | 7.25 ± 0.77 | 7.37 ± 0.65 | 7.45 ± 1.01 | 7.51 ± 0.94 | 7.38 ± 0.73 | 7.22 ± 1.30 | |
| Time to fall asleep (minutes) | ER | 12.54 ± 7.19 | 13.58 ± 10.92 | 12.72 ± 9.77 | 14.46 ± 8.34 | 14.45 ± 14.89 | 18.01 ± 21.80 | 10.65 ± 6.74 |
| CG | 18.89 ± 17.23 | 12.16 ± 8.36 | 12.18 ± 8.28 | 16.66 ± 19.89 | 11.40 ± 8.32 | 10.84 ± 6.40 | 7.05 ± 4.20 | |
| PSQI-G-score | ER | 5.14 ± 1.75 | 3.93 ± 0.92 | 3.71 ± 1.27* | ||||
| CG | 5.07 ± 2.23 | 5.14 ± 1.51 | 4.43 ± 2.03* | |||||
| POMS-G | ||||||||
| Depression/anxiety | ER | 24.86 ± 9.54 | 24.86 ± 9.45 | 22.50 ± 7.52 | ||||
| CG | 23.86 ± 9.78 | 27.43 ± 12.43 | 26.36 ± 13.70 | |||||
| Fatigue | ER | 21.00 ± 6.19 | 21.21 ± 7.56 | 17.57 ± 8.67 | ||||
| CG | 21.14 ± 6.70 | 20.14 ± 6.89 | 22.36 ± 8.02 | |||||
| Vigor | ER | 33.00 ± 6.26 | 31.50 ± 5.49 | 30.21 ± 8.05* | ||||
| CG | 32.21 ± 4.89 | 31.57 ± 7.94 | 27.50 ± 8.90* | |||||
| Hostility | ER | 14.50 ± 6.98 | 13.93 ± 8.22 | 10.86 ± 5.48 | ||||
| CG | 14.43 ± 6.05 | 16.79 ± 8.26 | 16.07 ± 9.47 |
Overview of the sleep and mood analysis [energy-restricted group (ER), control group (CG), PSQI-G (Pittsburgh sleep quality index–German)].
Indicates a significant difference between week 0 and week 1 (p < 0.05);
significantly differed to week 1 (p < 0.05).
Discussion
Body Composition
In this study, we tested the effect of a high-protein moderate energy restriction on body composition change. Generally, maintaining muscle mass is an important health factor due to role of muscle as a primary site of postprandial glucose disposal, lipid oxidation and resting energy expenditure (Hector and Phillips, ). In the context of sports, temporary phases of energy restriction are used to reduce body mass while trying to maintain as much lean body mass as possible (Artioli et al., ). In particular, lean body mass retention is not only crucial for athletic performance (Wolfe, 2006), but also correlates with athletic success (Slater et al., 2005; Chappell et al., ).
In the ER group, lean body mass decreased significantly between week 3 and week 6 with an average total loss of −1.49 kg. According to Siedler et al. (2021), BIA day-to-day variance in lean body mass is as high as 0.9 kg. However, since the decrease in lean body mass is greater than what could be explained by BIA precision error, our data suggest real lean body mass loss in the ER group. With that said, we conclude that the investigated high-protein moderate energy restriction is likely not able to prevent lean mass loss in college students in the absence of resistance training. Consequently, our hypothesis is rejected. Notably, it is unknown whether protein intake at 2.8 g/kg FFM prevented larger decreases in lean body mass. Contrarily, lean body mass was not negatively altered in the CG. Since the CG increased body mass, this indicates a slight caloric surplus.
The energy-restriction-induced reduction of lean body mass is in accordance with the majority of studies (Karila et al., ; Pikosky et al., ; Morton et al., ; Wilson et al., 2012; Pasiakos et al., ; Rhyu and Cho, ), albeit conflicting results exist (Paoli et al., ; Huovinen et al., ; Wilson et al., 2015). Since caloric intake, total protein consumption, sex, and sleep duration were taken into account, the inter-study differences may, at least partly, be explained by the magnitude of mechanical tension the body is exposed (Callahan et al., ). In one of the studies reporting no significant lean mass change, Paoli et al. () recruited elite artistic gymnasts using a keto-approach (−400 kcal/day, high-protein). With respect to their training regimen, an intense schedule of body weight exercises was carried out which might have led to a greater fiber recruitment of the loaded muscles. In turn, this could have acted as an anabolic stimulus and, in connection with the small energy restriction applied (Karila et al., ; Heymsfield et al., ), may have led to the retention of muscle mass. This seems to be in accordance with our study showing individual variation in lean mass change in the context of the different types of physical activity performed. Notably, given the fact that Paoli et al. () studied elite athletes, we cannot rule out that strength and conditioning exercises were used additionally without being reported.
Since lean body mass in MFBIA depicts the fat-free compartments of the whole body with muscle mass only representing ~50% (Serra-Prat et al., 2019), solely interpreting the lean body mass change may bias the results. Therefore, body cell mass, representing the protein-rich and metabolically-active compartments of the body (Kyle et al., ), i.e., the muscle and organ tissue, is probably the most sensitive marker for muscle loss in MFBIA. In accordance with what has been concluded for the lean body mass change, body cell mass linearly decreased over time in the ER group at the beginning of week 4. In this context, the herein depicted time course of muscle mass loss is in contrast to Heymsfield et al. () who reported an almost linear muscle mass loss at the beginning of the hypocaloric phase in overweight individuals mainly based on the CALERIE study (Heilbronn et al., ; Redman et al., ; Rickman et al., ) and the study by Wood et al. (2007). Contrarily, Schoenfeld et al. (2020a) reported that lean mass loss predominantly occurred during the final weeks of the contest preparation. Since we cannot identify whether these differences might be attributed to the insensitivity of our MFBIA model, other moderator variables, or the potential protective properties of a high-protein dieting approach, this should be studied in future.
Muscle Contractile Properties
In this study, we tested the effect of a high-protein moderate energy restriction on muscle contractile properties which is, to our knowledge, the first study directly examining the impact of controlled dietary manipulations on TMG and MMG outcomes. In this context, we hypothesized that contractile properties are not negatively altered throughout the study.
Despite depicting high alterations in contractile properties (e.g., muscle force after electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve) during severe caloric restriction (Lopes et al., ; Lennmarken et al., ), no group × time interaction was found for any tested variable. With that being said, we conclude that the high-protein moderately energy-restricted diet used in this study did not negatively alter muscle contractile properties. Consequently, our hypothesis is accepted. However, whether this advantage is due to the high-protein diet itself cannot be clarified with the present study and must be examined in future work. Notably, Tc, which is the contraction time in ms from 10 to 90% of Dm on the ascending curve (García-García et al., ), tended to increase over time and may reflect a muscle fiber type shift (Valencic and Knez, 1997; Dahmane et al., ; Šimunić et al., 2011; Zubac and Šimunić, 2017) in the context of region-specific muscle mass loss (Zubac et al., 2017; Paravlic et al., ). However, since different fiber type distributions highly influence the direction of the Tc shift (García-García et al., ), no exact conclusion can be drawn. Furthermore, a non-significant upwards trend of Dm in the ER group (9.8%) was spotted. In this context, Dm is seen as an indicator of muscle stiffness whereas a strong negative correlation between Dm and stiffness (Macgregor et al., ), as well as Dm and atrophy (Pišot et al., , ) appears to exist. This was expanded by Šimunić et al. (2019) declaring Dm as a potential marker of early atrophy. However, since the same non-significant trend, i.e., stiffness loss, was also found in the CG (6.8%), no exact conclusion can be drawn.
Furthermore, the high-protein energy restriction did not show any significant effects on the MMG parameters. However, while the ER group remained at a constant frequency, we noted an upwards trend in the CG. This might reflect higher external loading (e.g., physical activity) since muscle tone amplitude decreases during bed rest (Pišot et al., ; Demangel et al., ; Schoenrock et al., 2018). Although we cannot rule out that the potential between-group difference is attributed to mechanical tension (Rusu et al., 2013; Schoenrock et al., 2018) or day-to-day variability, physical activity (minutes of sport per week) did not differ between groups. Therefore, we cautiously argue that the greater carbohydrate intake and hence, higher glycogen and intracellular water levels led to a comparably higher muscle tone. As already hypothesized by the following authors (Shiose et al., 2016; Cholewa et al., ), carbohydrate loading may increase subcutaneous tension and, thereby, stretches the skin over the evaluated muscle.
Sleep
Sleep is critical for recovery, performance and lean mass retention (Knufinke et al., ; Wang et al., 2018). In our intervention, sleeping hours per night and sleep onset did not change throughout the study as measured by sleep diary. Although diaries might be more accurate than questionnaires, they are prone to recall bias (Halson, ) and hence, must be cautiously interpreted. The PSQI-G score, indicative of subjective sleeping quality, decreased significantly in both groups; however, this trend was higher, though not significant, in the ER group compared to the CG. These findings are in contrast to data reported by Driver et al. () who concluded that caloric restriction does not elicit a significant effect on sleep quality in healthy, non-obese men. However, the participants of Driver et al. () only consumed 87 g of protein per day on average and hence, consumed more than 50% less protein compared to our study. The sleep-improving properties of higher protein consumption is described by other authors (Lindseth et al., ) and is probably explained by the improved tryptophan to large-chain neural amino acids (Trp-to-LCNAA) ratio. Mediated by a higher insulin secretion, tryptophan is transported across the blood chain barrier and hence, stimulates the synthesis and function of neurotransmitters (e.g., serotonin) as a dietary precursor (Wurtman et al., 2003). However, there seems to be a ceiling effect as seen in athletes who are used to a steady protein supplementation (Antonio et al., ). With that being said, we conclude that a high-protein moderate energy restriction (ER group) may have beneficial effects on sleeping quality which might be greater by trend than a high-protein intake alone (CG). However, due to the lack of low-protein controls, this cannot be clarified and warrants further study.
Mood
Mood changes are constantly reported in athletic populations (Helms et al., ; Reardon et al., ). However, there appears to be a plethora of factors influencing mood changes ranging from predisposition, acute biological effects of semi-starvation, to stress due to body monitoring (Helms et al., ). Our data predominantly demonstrate no changes in the POMS-G scores. This indicates that neither the moderate energy restriction nor the constant diet, training and body mass tracking had a negative impact on the POMS-G-derived parameters of depression/anxiety, fatigue and hostility. In this context, mood stability might be attributed to the flexible and individual macronutrient profile in our study (Westenhoefer et al., 1999, 2013) and the short duration under energy restriction. Surprisingly, vigor decreased in both groups. In this context, both the ER group and the CG exhibited a significant drop by 10% and 9%, respectively. This is in accordance with most (Degoutte et al., ; Koral and Dosseville, ; Hulmi et al., ), but not all (Wilson et al., 2012) research. For example, in a study by Koral and Dosseville () examining the contest preparation of judokas (−600 kcal/day), the authors reported decreased vigor for the energy restriction but not for the isocaloric controls. Although Koral and Dosseville () attributed the decrease in vigor to body mass loss—supporting the drop revealed in the ER group—this explanation does not fit to the vigor drop shown in the CG in this study. A possible explanation for this might be the high dietary intake that our participants had to consume (45 kcal/kg) of which most of them were not accustomed (Burke et al., ).
Limitations
Nevertheless, our findings need cautious interpretation due to inherent limitations. Overall, the study relied on self-reported dietary intake. Although we controlled total protein intake, meal frequency (Iwao et al., ), protein dosage per meal (Loenneke et al., ), protein timing (Schoenfeld et al., 2013), and protein source (Gilbert et al., ) might also influence lean mass preservation during energy restriction.
In perspective of MFBIA, we found subsequent points worth mentioning. Firstly, hydration status was only assessed using extracellular/intracellular water ratio. Although examination was carried out after an overnight fast, studies intending to replicate our design may use exact measurements of hydration status (e.g., urine-specific gravity) and may also implement a refeeding period after the weight loss intervention to account for possible water fluctuations (Martin-Rincon et al., ), as well as their effect on the body cell mass calculation (Walter-Kroker et al., 2011). Secondly, adipose tissue consists of a large extracellular and a small fat-free cell mass per unit weight (Wang and Pierson, 1976; Abe et al., ) and, therefore, large amounts of adipose tissue loss may be automatically reported as lean tissue loss. Nevertheless, body cell mass quantification does not take adipocyte changes into account and is likely to be a better marker to decide whether real muscle loss has occurred. Since body cell mass is not only made up of skeletal muscle but also comprises organ tissue, this may also bias interpretation (Nose et al., ; Gallagher et al., ). Hence, future studies should use DXA or implement a combination of methods (DXA and MFBIA or sonography and BIA/DXA; Haun et al., ). Thirdly, regarding the BIA technique, 95% of the impedance is measured in the lower limbs. Thus, the depicted values are mainly derived as a snapshot of lower body changes (Ward, 2019); however, they do seem to be supported by the TMG data.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the present data show that a high-protein intake alone was not able to prevent lean mass loss associated with a 6-week moderate energy restriction in college students in the absence of resistance training. However, the data revealed that this form of energy restriction did not negatively affect muscle contractility. Sleep quality improved in both groups. This is probably explained by the improved tryptophan to Trp-to-LCNAA ratio; however, there seems to be a ceiling effect as seen in athletes who are used to a steady protein supplementation. Whether these advantages are due to the high-protein intake cannot be clarified due to the lack of low-protein controls and warrants further study. Although vigor was negatively affected in both groups, other mood parameters did not change. In summary, decreasing energy intake moderately while increasing protein consumption does not maintain lean body mass but does maintain contractility in the absence of resistance training in male college students.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article are publicly available. The data can be accessed at the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO) under the registration number DRKS00017263. Upon request, the data will be made available, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee (#2019-24, Goethe University Frankfurt, GER) and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards set by the declaration of Helsinki. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
Data analysis was performed by CR and double-checked by LR. Data interpretation was performed by CR, LR, and MB. CR wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study, manuscript revision, and read and approved the final version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2021.683327/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AbeT.DankelS. J.LoennekeJ. P. (2019). Body fat loss automatically reduces lean mass by changing the fat-free component of adipose tissue. Obesity27, 357–258. 10.1002/oby.22393
2
AirdL.SamuelD.StokesM. (2012). Quadriceps muscle tone, elasticity, and stiffness in older males: reliability and symmetry using the MyotonPRO. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr.55, e31–39. 10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.005
3
AlbaniC.GunzelmannT.SchmutzerG.GrulkeN.BailerH.BlaserG.et al. (2005). Die emotionale Befindlichkeit älterer Menschen—Normierung des Profile of Mood States für über 60-Jährige [The emotional sensitivity of elderly people—validation of the Profile of Mood States for people over 60 years]. J. Gerontol. Geriatr.38, 431–440. 10.1007/s00391-005-0314-x
4
AntonioJ.BurgessV.CarsonC.EllerbroekA.AxelrodC.PeacockC. A.et al. (2019b). High-protein diet has no effect on sleep quality and quantity in exercise-trained men and women. J. Exerc. Nutr.2, 1–3. 10.3390/jfmk3040062
5
AntonioJ.KenyonM.EllerbroekA.CarsonC.BurgessV.Tyler-PalmerD.et al. (2019a). Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) versus a Multi-frequency Bioelectrical Impedance (InBody 770) device for body composition assessment after a 4-week hypoenergetic diet. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol.4, 23–31. 10.3390/jfmk4020023
6
ArtioliG. G.IglesiasR. T.FranchiniE.GualanoB.KashiwaguraD. B.SolisM. Y.et al. (2010). Rapid weight loss followed by recovery time does not affect judo-related performance. J. Sports Sci.28, 21–32. 10.1080/02640410903428574
7
BandeganA.Courtney-MartinG.RafiiM.PencharzP. B.LemonP. W. (2017). Indicator amino acid-derived estimate of dietary protein requirement for male bodybuilders on a nontraining day is several-fold greater than the current recommended dietary allowance. J. Nutr.147, 850–857. 10.3945/jn.116.236331
8
BealsJ. W.BurdN. A.MooreD. R.van VlietS. (2019). Obesity alters the muscle protein synthetic response to nutrition and exercise. Front. Nutr.6:87. 10.3389/fnut.2019.00087
9
BizziniM.MannionA. F. (2003). Reliability of a new, hand-held device for assessing skeletal muscle stiffness. Clin. Biomech.18, 459–461. 10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00042-1
10
BosquetL.NiortT.PoiraultM. (2017). Intra- and inter-day reliability of body composition assessed by a commercial multifrequency bioelectrical impedance meter. Sports Med. Int. Open1, E141–E146. 10.1055/s-0043-113999
11
Bosy-WestphalA.MüllerM. J. (2014). Measuring the impact of weight cycling on body composition: a methodological challenge. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care17, 396–400. 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000092
12
BrzozowskaA.MlakR.GołebiowskiP.Małecka-MassalskaT. (2019). Status of hydration assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis: a valuable predictive factor for radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Clin. Trans. Oncol.21, 615–620. 10.1007/s12094-018-1963-8
13
BullingerM.HeinischM.LudwigM.GeierS. (1990). Skalen zur Erfassung des Wohlbefindens: Psychometrische Analysen zum “Profile of Mood States” (POMS) und zum “Psychological General Well-Being Index” (PGWI). [Scales for the assessment of emotional well-being: Psychometric analysis of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWI)]. J. Differ. Diagn. Psychol.11, 53–61.
14
BurkeL. M.CloseG. L.LundyB.MoosesM.MortonJ. P.TenfordeA. S. (2018). Relative energy deficiency in sport in male athletes: a commentary on its presentation among selected groups of male athletes. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab.28, 364–374. 10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0182
15
BuysseD. J.ReynoldsC. F.MonkT. H.BermanS. R.KupferD. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res.28, 193–213. 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
16
CallahanM. J.ParrE. B.HawleyJ. A.CameraD. M. (2021). Can high-intensity interval training promote skeletal muscle anabolism?Sports Med.51, 405–421. 10.1007/s40279-020-01397-3
17
CaplingL.BeckK. L.GiffordJ. A.SlaterG.FloodV. M.O'ConnorH. (2017). Validity of dietary assessment in athletes: a systematic review. Nutrients9, 1313–1338. 10.3390/nu9121313
18
CarboneJ. W.MargolisL. M.McClungJ. P.CaoJ. J.MurphyN. E.SauterE. R.et al. (2013). Effects of energy deficit, dietary protein, and feeding on intracellular regulators of skeletal muscle proteolysis. FASEB J.27, 5104–5111. 10.1096/fj.13-239228
19
ChappellA. J.SimperT.BarkerM. E. (2018). Nutritional strategies of high level natural bodybuilders during competition preparation. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr.15, 4–15. 10.1186/s12970-018-0209-z
20
CholewaJ. M.NewmireD. E.ZanchiN. E. (2019). Carbohydrate restriction: friend or foe of resistance-based exercise performance?Nutrition60, 136–146. 10.1016/j.nut.2018.09.026
21
Churchward-VenneT. A.MurphyC. H.LonglandT. M.PhillipsS. M. (2013). Role of protein and amino acids in promoting lean mass accretion with resistance exercise and attenuating lean mass loss during energy deficit in humans. Amino Acids45, 231–240. 10.1007/s00726-013-1506-0
22
CumberledgeE. A.MyersC.VendittiJ. J.DixonC. B.AndreacciJ. L. (2018). The effect of the menstrual cycle on body composition determined by contact-electrode bioelectrical impedance analyzers. Int. J. Exerc. Sci.11, 625–632.
23
DahmaneR.DjordjevičS.ŠimunićB.ValenčičV. (2005). Spatial fiber type distribution in normal human muscle Histochemical and tensiomyographical evaluation. J. Biomech.38, 2451–2459. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.020
24
DegoutteF.JouanelP.BègueR. J.ColombierM.LacG.PequignotJ. M.et al. (2006). Food restriction, performance, biochemical, psychological, and endocrine changes in judo athletes. Int. J. Sports Med.27, 9–18. 10.1055/s-2005-837505
25
DemangelR.TreffelL.PyG.BriocheT.PaganoA. F.BareilleM.-P.et al. (2017). Early structural and functional signature of 3-day human skeletal muscle disuse using the dry immersion model. J. Physiol.595, 4301–4315. 10.1113/JP273895
26
DitroiloM.SmithI. J.FairweatherM. M.HunterA. M. (2013). Long-term stability of tensiomyography measured under different muscle conditions. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.23, 558–563. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.01.014
27
DriverH.ShulmanI.BakerF.BuffensteinR. (1999). Energy content of the evening meal alters nocturnal body temperature but not sleep. Physiol. Behav.68, 17–23. 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00145-6
28
EconomosC. D.BortzS. S.NelsonM. E. (1993). Nutritional practices of elite athletes. Sports Med.16, 381–399. 10.2165/00007256-199316060-00004
29
EvenepoelC.CleversE.DerooverL.MatthysC.VerbekeK. (2020). Dietary assessment with the online platform MyFitnessPal: a reliable method?Proc. Nutr. Soc.79:506. 10.1017/S0029665120004541
30
FranchiniE.BritoC. J.ArtioliG. G. (2012). Weight loss in combat sports: physiological, psychological, and performance effects. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr.9, 52–57. 10.1186/1550-2783-9-52
31
GallagherD.KelleyD. E.ThorntonJ.BoxtL.Pi-SunyerX.LipkinE.et al. (2017). Changes in skeletal muscle and organ size after a weight-loss intervention in overweight and obese type 2 diabetic patients. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.105, 78–84. 10.3945/ajcn.116.139188
32
García-GarcíaO.Cancela-CarralJ. M.Martínez-TrigoR.Serrano-GómezV. (2013). Differences in the contractile properties of the knee extensor and flexor muscles in professional road cyclists during the season. J. Strength Cond. Res.27, 2760–2767. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828155cd
33
García-GarcíaO.Cuba-DoradoA.Álvarez-YatesT.Carballo-LópezJ.Iglesias-CaamañoM. (2019). Clinical utility of tensiomyography for muscle function analysis in athletes. Open Access J. Sports Med.10, 49–69. 10.2147/OAJSM.S161485
34
García-GarcíaO.Cuba-DoradoA.Fernández-RedondoD.López-ChicharroJ. (2018). Neuromuscular parameters predict the performance in an incremental cycling test. Int. J. Sports Med.39, 909–915. 10.1055/a-0644-3784
35
GavronskiG.VeraksitsA.VasarE.MaaroosJ. (2007). Evaluation of viscoelastic parameters of the skeletal muscles in junior triathletes. Physiol. Meas.28, 625–637. 10.1088/0967-3334/28/6/002
36
GilbertJ.-A.BendsenN. T.TremblayA.AstrupA. (2011). Effect of proteins from different sources on body composition. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis.21(Suppl. 2), B16–B31. 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.12.008
37
GoljaP.Robič PikelT.Zdešar KotnikK.FleŽarM.SelakS.KapusJ.et al. (2020). Direct comparison of (anthropometric) methods for the assessment of body composition. Ann. Nutr. Metab.76, 183–192. 10.1159/000508514
38
GrulkeN.BailerH.SchmutzerG.BrählerE.BlaserG.GeyerM.et al. (2006). Normierung der deutschen Kurzform des Fragebogens “Profile of Mood States” (POMS) anhand einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe–Kurzbericht [Standardization of the German short version of “profile of mood states” (POMS) in a representative sample–short communication]. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol.56, 403–405. 10.1055/s-2006-940129
39
GwinJ. A.ChurchD. D.Hatch-McChesneyA.HowardE. E.CarriganC. T.MurphyN. E.et al. (2020). Effects of high versus standard essential amino acid intakes on whole-body protein turnover and mixed muscle protein synthesis during energy deficit: a randomized, crossover study. Clin. Nutr.40, 767–777. 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.07.019
40
HallK. D. (2008). What is the required energy deficit per unit weight loss?Int. J. Obes.32, 573–576. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803720
41
HalsonS. L. (2019). Sleep monitoring in athletes: motivation, methods, miscalculations, and why it matters. Sport Med.49, 1487–1497. 10.1007/s40279-019-01119-4
42
HarrissD. J.AtkinsonG. (2015). Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int. J. Sports Med.36, 1121–1124. 10.1055/s-0035-1565186
43
HaunC. T.VannC. G.MobleyC. B.RobersonP. A.OsburnS. C.HolmesH. M.et al. (2018). Effects of graded whey supplementation during extreme-volume resistance training. Front. Nutr.5:84. 10.3389/fnut.2018.00084
44
HectorA. J.PhillipsS. M. (2018). Protein recommendations for weight loss in elite athletes: a focus on body composition and performance. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab.28, 170–177. 10.1123/ijsnem.2017-0273
45
HeikuraI. A.UusitaloA. L. T.StellingwerffT.BerglandD.MeroA. A.BurkeL. M. (2018). Low energy availability is difficult to assess but outcomes have large impact on bone injury rates in elite distance athletes. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab.28, 403–411. 10.1123/ijsnem.2017-0313
46
HeilbronnL. K.JongeL.de FrisardM. I.DeLanyJ. P.Larson-MeyerD. E.RoodJ.et al. (2006). Effect of 6-month calorie restriction on biomarkers of longevity, metabolic adaptation, and oxidative stress in overweight individuals: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA295, 1539–1548. 10.1001/jama.295.13.1539
47
HelmsE. R.PrnjakK.LinardonJ. (2019). Towards a sustainable nutrition paradigm in physique sport: a narrative review. Sports (Basel, Switzerland)7, 172–190. 10.3390/sports7070172
48
HelmsE. R.ZinnC.RowlandsD. S.BrownS. R. (2014). A systematic review of dietary protein during caloric restriction in resistance trained lean athletes: a case for higher intakes. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab.24, 127–138. 10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0054
49
HeymsfieldS. B.ThomasD.NguyenA. M.PengJ. Z.MartinC.ShenW.et al. (2011). Voluntary weight loss: systematic review of early phase body composition changes. Obes. Rev.12, e348–e361. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00767.x
50
HudsonJ. L.WangY.Bergia IiiR. E.CampbellW. W. (2020). Protein intake greater than the RDA differentially influences whole-body lean mass responses to purposeful catabolic and anabolic stressors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv. Nutr.11, 548–558. 10.1093/advances/nmz106
51
HulmiJ. J.IsolaV.SuonpääM.JärvinenN. J.KokkonenM.WennerströmA.et al. (2016). The effects of intensive weight reduction on body composition and serum hormones in female fitness competitors. Front. Physiol.7:689. 10.3389/fphys.2016.00689
52
HuovinenH. T.HulmiJ. J.IsolehtoJ.KyröläinenH.PuurtinenR.KarilaT.et al. (2015). Body composition and power performance improved after weight reduction in male athletes without hampering hormonal balance. J. Strength Cond. Res.29, 29–36. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000619
53
InalS.ErtenY.OkyayG. U.AtaşN.OneçK.YaylaC.et al. (2014). Association between bioimpedance analysis parameters and left ventricular hypertrophy in peritoneal dialysis patients. Int. Urol. Nephrol.46, 1851–1856. 10.1007/s11255-014-0709-y
54
IwaoS.MoriK.SatoY. (1996). Effects of meal frequency on body composition during weight control in boxers. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports6, 265–272. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1996.tb00469.x
55
KarilaT. A. M.SarkkinenP.MarttinenM.SeppäläT.MeroA.TallrothK. (2008). Rapid weight loss decreases serum testosterone. Int. J. Sports Med.29, 872–877. 10.1055/s-2008-1038604
56
KellmannM.GoleniaM. (2003). Skalen zur Erfasssung der aktuellen Befindlichkeit im Sport. German Mag. Sports Med.54, 329–330.
57
KimI.-Y.SchutzlerS.SchraderA.SpencerH. J.AzharG.FerrandoA. A.et al. (2016). The anabolic response to a meal containing different amounts of protein is not limited by the maximal stimulation of protein synthesis in healthy young adults. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.310, E73–E80. 10.1152/ajpendo.00365.2015
58
KnufinkeM.NieuwenhuysA.GeurtsS. A. E.CoenenA. M. L.KompierM. A. J. (2018). Self-reported sleep quantity, quality and sleep hygiene in elite athletes. J. Sleep Res.27, 78–85. 10.1111/jsr.12509
59
KoehlerK.HoernerN. R.GibbsJ. C.ZinnerC.BraunH.SouzaM. J.et al. (2016). Low energy availability in exercising men is associated with reduced leptin and insulin but not with changes in other metabolic hormones. J. Sports Sci.34, 1921–1929. 10.1080/02640414.2016.1142109
60
KoralJ.DossevilleF. (2009). Combination of gradual and rapid weight loss: effects on physical performance and psychological state of elite judo athletes. J. Sports Sci.27, 115–120. 10.1080/02640410802413214
61
KyleU. G.BosaeusI.LorenzoA. D.de DeurenbergP.EliaM.GómezJ. M.et al. (2004). Bioelectrical impedance analysis–part I: review of principles and methods. Clin. Nutr.23, 1226–1243. 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004
62
LeeW. Y. H.ClarkB. K.WinklerE.EakinE. G.ReevesM. M. (2015). Responsiveness to change of self-report and device-based physical activity measures in the living well with diabetes trial. J. Phys. Act. Health12, 1082–1087. 10.1123/jpah.2013-0265
63
LennmarkenC.SandstedtS.SchenckH. V.LarssonJ. (1986). The effect of starvation on skeletal muscle function in man. Clin. Nutr.5, 99–103. 10.1016/0261-5614(86)90015-4
64
LeproultR.van CauterE. (2011). Effect of 1 week of sleep restriction on testosterone levels in young healthy men. JAMA305, 2173–2174. 10.1001/jama.2011.710
65
LindsethG.LindsethP.ThompsonM. (2013). Nutritional effects on sleep. West. J. Nurs. Res.35, 497–513. 10.1177/0193945911416379
66
LoennekeJ. P.LoprinziP. D.MurphyC. H.PhillipsS. M. (2016). Per meal dose and frequency of protein consumption is associated with lean mass and muscle performance. Clin. Nutr.35, 1506–1511. 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.002
67
LohrC.BraumannK.-M.ReerR.SchroederJ.SchmidtT. (2018). Reliability of tensiomyography and myotonometry in detecting mechanical and contractile characteristics of the lumbar erector spinae in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.118, 1349–1359. 10.1007/s00421-018-3867-2
68
LohrC.SchmidtT.Medina-PorqueresI.BraumannK.-M.ReerR.PorthunJ. (2019). Diagnostic accuracy, validity, and reliability of Tensiomyography to assess muscle function and exercise-induced fatigue in healthy participants. A systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.47, 65–87. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.005
69
LonglandT. M.OikawaS. Y.MitchellC. J.DevriesM. C.PhillipsS. M. (2016). Higher compared with lower dietary protein during an energy deficit combined with intense exercise promotes greater lean mass gain and fat mass loss: a randomized trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.103, 738–746. 10.3945/ajcn.115.119339
70
LopesJ.RussellD. M.WhitwellJ.JeejeebhoyK. N. (1982). Skeletal muscle function in malnutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.36, 602–610. 10.1093/ajcn/36.4.602
71
LoturcoI.PereiraL. A.KobalR.KitamuraK.Ramírez-CampilloR.ZanettiV.et al. (2016). Muscle contraction velocity: a suitable approach to analyze the functional adaptations in elite soccer players. J. Sports Sci. Med.15, 483–491.
72
MacgregorL. J.HunterA. M.OrizioC.FairweatherM. M.DitroiloM. (2018). Assessment of skeletal muscle contractile properties by radial displacement: the case for tensiomyography. Sports Med.48, 1607–1620. 10.1007/s40279-018-0912-6
73
MacnaughtonL. S.WardleS. L.WitardO. C.McGloryC.HamiltonD. L.JeromsonS.et al. (2016). The response of muscle protein synthesis following whole-body resistance exercise is greater following 40 g than 20 g of ingested whey protein. Physiol. Rep.4:e12893. 10.14814/phy2.12893
74
ManoreM. M. (2015). Weight management for athletes and active individuals: a brief review. Sports Med.45(Suppl. 1), 83–92. 10.1007/s40279-015-0401-0
75
Martin-RinconM.Pérez-LópezA.Morales-AlamoD.Perez-SuarezI.Pablos-VelascoP.de Perez-ValeraM.et al. (2019). Exercise mitigates the loss of muscle mass by attenuating the activation of autophagy during severe energy deficit. Nutrients11, 2824–2849. 10.3390/nu11112824
76
McNairD.LorrM.DropplemanL. (1981). “Profile of mood states,” in Ein Verfahren zur Messung von Stimmungszuständen. Internationale Skalen für Psychatrie., ed Collegium Internationale Psychiatrie Scalarum (CIPS) (Weinheim: Beltz Test Gesellschaft).
77
McNairD.LorrM.DropplemanL. (1992). Profile of Mood States Manual (Rev.). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
78
MettlerS.MitchellN.TiptonK. D. (2010). Increased protein intake reduces lean body mass loss during weight loss in athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.42, 326–337. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b2ef8e
79
MillwardD. J. (2001). Protein and amino acid requirements of adults: current controversies. Can. J. Appl. Physiol.26(Suppl.), 130–140. 10.1139/h2001-048
80
MoherD.SchulzK. F.AltmanD. G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med. Res. Methodol.1, 1191–1194. 10.1186/1471-2288-1-2
81
MoonJ. R. (2013). Body composition in athletes and sports nutrition: an examination of the bioimpedance analysis technique. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.67(Suppl. 1), 54–59. 10.1038/ejcn.2012.165
82
MortonJ. P.RobertsonC.SuttonL.MacLarenD. P. M. (2010). Making the weight: a case study from professional boxing. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab.20, 80–85. 10.1123/ijsnem.20.1.80
83
MullixJ.WarnerM.StokesM. (2012). Testing muscle tone and mechanical properties of rectus femoris and biceps femoris using a novel hand held MyotonPRO device: relative ratios and reliability. Working Papers Health Sci.1, 1–8.
84
MurphyC. H.HectorA. J.PhillipsS. M. (2015). Considerations for protein intake in managing weight loss in athletes. Eur. J. Sport Sci.15, 21–28. 10.1080/17461391.2014.936325
85
NoseH.MorimotoT.OguraK. (1983). Distribution of water losses among fluid compartments of tissues under thermal dehydration in the rat. Jpn. J. Physiol.33, 1019–1029. 10.2170/jjphysiol.33.1019
86
O'ConnorH.OldsT.MaughanR. J. (2007). Physique and performance for track and field events. J. Sports Sci.25(Suppl. 1), 49–60. 10.1080/02640410701607296
87
PaoliA.GrimaldiK.D'AgostinoD.CenciL.MoroT.BiancoA.et al. (2012). Ketogenic diet does not affect strength performance in elite artistic gymnasts. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr.9, 34–42. 10.1186/1550-2783-9-34
88
ParavlicA. H.PišotR.ŠimunićB. (2020). Muscle-specific changes of lower extremities in the early period after total knee arthroplasty: Insight from tensiomyography. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact.20, 390–397.
89
ParkS.JangJ.ChoiM. D.ShinY.-A.SchutzlerS.AzharG.et al. (2020). The anabolic response to dietary protein is not limited by the maximal stimulation of protein synthesis in healthy older adults: a randomized crossover trial. Nutrients12, 3276–3286. 10.3390/nu12113276
90
PasiakosS. M.CaoJ. J.MargolisL. M.SauterE. R.WhighamL. D.McClungJ. P.et al. (2013). Effects of high-protein diets on fat-free mass and muscle protein synthesis following weight loss: a randomized controlled trial. FASEB J.27, 3837–3847. 10.1096/fj.13-230227
91
Paula SimolaR. Á.de HarmsN.RaederC.KellmannM.MeyerT.PfeifferM.et al. (2015). Tensiomyography reliability and prediction of changes in muscle force following heavy eccentric strength exercise using muscle mechanical properties. Sports Technol.8, 58–66. 10.1080/19346182.2015.1117475
92
PejovicS.BastaM.VgontzasA. N.KritikouI.ShafferM. L.TsaoussoglouM.et al. (2013). Effects of recovery sleep after one work week of mild sleep restriction on interleukin-6 and cortisol secretion and daytime sleepiness and performance. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.305, E890–E896. 10.1152/ajpendo.00301.2013
93
PhillipsS. M. (2008). Higher protein during an energy deficit: muscle's guardian and fat's enemy?Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.40, 503–504. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181629a44
94
PhillipsS. M. (2014). A brief review of higher dietary protein diets in weight loss: a focus on athletes. Sports Med.44(Suppl. 2), 149–153. 10.1007/s40279-014-0254-y
95
PhilpottJ. D.BootsmaN. J.Rodriguez-SanchezN.HamiltonD. L.MacKinlayE.DickJ.et al. (2019). Influence of fish oil-derived n-3 fatty acid supplementation on changes in body composition and muscle strength during short-term weight loss in resistance-trained men. Front. Nutr.6:102. 10.3389/fnut.2019.00102
96
PikoskyM. A.SmithT. J.GrediaginA.Castaneda-SceppaC.ByerleyL.GlickmanE. L.et al. (2008). Increased protein maintains nitrogen balance during exercise-induced energy deficit. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.40, 505–512. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31815f6643
97
Piqueras-SanchizF.Martín-RodríguezS.Pareja-BlancoF.Baraja-VegasL.Blázquez-FernándezJ.BautistaI. J.et al. (2020). Mechanomyographic measures of muscle contractile properties are influenced by electrode size and stimulation pulse duration. Sci. Rep.10, 8192–8190. 10.1038/s41598-020-65111-z
98
PišotR.NariciM. V.ŠimunićB.BoerM.de SeynnesO.JurdanaM.et al. (2008). Whole muscle contractile parameters and thickness loss during 35-day bed rest. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.104, 409–414. 10.1007/s00421-008-0698-6
99
PišotR.ŠimunićB.DolencP. (2016). Physical inactivity effects on morphological and muscoskeletal changes. J. Safety Life4, 34–49.
100
PonsV.RieraJ.CapóX.MartorellM.SuredaA.TurJ. A.et al. (2018). Calorie restriction regime enhances physical performance of trained athletes. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr.15, 12–21. 10.1186/s12970-018-0214-2
101
ReardonC. L.HainlineB.AronC. M.BaronD.BaumA. L.BindraA.et al. (2019). Mental health in elite athletes: International Olympic Committee consensus statement (2019). Br. J. Sports Med.53, 667–699. 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100715
102
RedmanL. M.HeilbronnL. K.MartinC. K.AlfonsoA.SmithS. R.RavussinE. (2007). Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on body composition and fat distribution. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.92, 865–872. 10.1210/jc.2006-2184
103
RhyuH.-S.ChoS.-Y. (2014). The effect of weight loss by ketogenic diet on the body composition, performance-related physical fitness factors and cytokines of Taekwondo athletes. J. Exerc. Rehabil.10, 326–331. 10.12965/jer.140160
104
RickmanA. D.WilliamsonD. A.MartinC. K.GilhoolyC. H.SteinR. I.BalesC. W.et al. (2011). The CALERIE study: design and methods of an innovative 25% caloric restriction intervention. Contemp. Clin. Trials32, 874–881. 10.1016/j.cct.2011.07.002
105
RiemannD.BackhausJ. (1996). Behandlung von Schlafstörungen.Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
106
Rodriguez MatosoD.Rodriguez-RuizD.SarmientoS.VaamondeD.Da Silva-GrigolettoM. E.García-ManoJ. M. (2010). Reproducibility of muscle response measurements using tensiomyography in a range of positions. Andalusian J. Sports Med.3, 81–86.
107
RusuL. D.CosmaG. G. H.CernaianuS. M.MarinM. N.RusuP. F. A.CiocănescuD. P.et al. (2013). Tensiomyography method used for neuromuscular assessment of muscle training. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.10, 67–74. 10.1186/1743-0003-10-67
108
Sánchez-SánchezJ.BishopD.García-UnanueJ.Ubago-GuisadoE.HernandoE.López-FernándezJ.et al. (2018). Effect of a Repeated Sprint Ability test on the muscle contractile properties in elite futsal players. Sci. Rep.8, 17284–17291. 10.1038/s41598-018-35345-z
109
SchoenfeldB. J.AltoA.GrgicJ.TinsleyG.HaunC. T.CampbellB. I.et al. (2020a). Alterations in body composition, resting metabolic rate, muscular strength, and eating behavior in response to natural bodybuilding competition preparation: a case study. J. Strength Cond. Res.34, 3124–3138. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003816
110
SchoenfeldB. J.AragonA. A.KriegerJ. W. (2013). The effect of protein timing on muscle strength and hypertrophy: a meta-analysis. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr.10, 53–65. 10.1186/1550-2783-10-53
111
SchoenfeldB. J.NickersonB. S.WilbornC. D.UrbinaS. L.HaywardS. B.KriegerJ.et al. (2020b). Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition changes after participation in a 10-week resistance training program. J. Strength Cond. Res.34, 678–688. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002708
112
SchoenrockB.ZanderV.DernS.LimperU.MulderE.VeraksitšA.et al. (2018). Bed rest, exercise countermeasure, and reconditioning effects on the human resting muscle tone system. Front. Physiol.9:810. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00810
113
Serra-PratM.LorenzoI.PalomeraE.YébenesJ.CampinsL.CabréM. (2019). intracellular water content in lean mass is associated with muscle strength, functional capacity, and frailty in community-dwelling elderly individuals. A cross-sectional study. Nutrients11, 661–669. 10.3390/nu11030661
114
ShioseK.YamadaY.MotonagaK.SagayamaH.HigakiY.TanakaH.et al. (2016). Segmental extracellular and intracellular water distribution and muscle glycogen after 72-h carbohydrate loading using spectroscopic techniques. J. Appl. Physiol.121, 205–211. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00126.2016
115
SiedlerM. R.HartyP. S.StrattonM. T.RodriguezC.KeithD.GreenJ.et al. (2021). “Day-to-day precision error and least significant change for two commonly used bioelectrical impedance analysis devices,” in International Journal of Exercise Science, TACSM Abstract (Poster). Available online at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijesab/vol2/iss13/; http://www.tacm.org
116
ŠimunićB. (2012). Between-day reliability of a method for non-invasive estimation of muscle composition. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.22, 527–530. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.04.003
117
ŠimunićB.DegensH.RittwegerJ.NariciM.MekjavićI. B.PišotR. (2011). Noninvasive estimation of myosin heavy chain composition in human skeletal muscle. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.43, 1619–1625. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821522d0
118
ŠimunićB.KorenK.RittwegerJ.LazzerS.ReggianiC.RejcE.et al. (2019). Tensiomyography detects early hallmarks of bed-rest-induced atrophy before changes in muscle architecture. J. Appl. Physiol.126, 815–822. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00880.2018
119
SlaterG. J.RiceA. J.MujikaI.HahnA. G.SharpeK.JenkinsD. G. (2005). Physique traits of lightweight rowers and their relationship to competitive success. Br. J. Sports Med.39, 736–741. 10.1136/bjsm.2004.015990
120
Stults-KolehmainenM. A.BartholomewJ. B.SinhaR. (2014). Chronic psychological stress impairs recovery of muscular function and somatic sensations over a 96-hour period. J. Strength Cond. Res.28, 2007–2017. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000335
121
Sundgot-BorgenJ.GartheI. (2011). Elite athletes in aesthetic and Olympic weight-class sports and the challenge of body weight and body compositions. J. Sports Sci.29(Suppl. 1), 101–114. 10.1080/02640414.2011.565783
122
Sundgot-BorgenJ.MeyerN. L.LohmanT. G.AcklandT. R.MaughanR. J.StewartA. D.et al. (2013). How to minimise the health risks to athletes who compete in weight-sensitive sports review and position statement on behalf of the Ad Hoc Research Working Group on Body Composition, Health and Performance, under the auspices of the IOC Medical Commission. Br. J. Sports Med.47, 1012–1022. 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092966
123
TurocyP. S.DePalmaB. F.HorswillC. A.LaqualeK. M.MartinT. J.PerryA. C.et al. (2011). National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: Safe weight loss and maintenance practices in sport and exercise. J. Athl. Train.46, 322–336. 10.4085/1062-6050-46.3.322
124
UtterA. C.McAnultyS. R.RihaB. F.PrattB. A.GroseJ. M. (2012). The validity of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance measures to detect changes in the hydration status of wrestlers during acute dehydration and rehydration. J. Strength Cond. Res.26, 9–15. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318238ea51
125
ValencicV.KnezN. (1997). Measuring of skeletal muscles' dynamic properties. Artif. Organs21, 240–242. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1997.tb04658.x
126
ViirR.LaihoK.KramarenkoJ.MikkelssonM. (2011). Repeatability of trapezius muscle tone assessment by a myometric method. J. Mech. Med. Biol.06, 215–228. 10.1142/S0219519406001856
127
WackerhageH.RennieM. J. (2006). How nutrition and exercise maintain the human musculoskeletal mass. J. Anat.208, 451–458. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00544.x
128
WalbergJ. L.LeidyM. K.SturgillD. J.HinkleD. E.RitcheyS. J.SeboltD. R. (1988). Macronutrient content of a hypoenergy diet affects nitrogen retention and muscle function in weight lifters. Int. J. Sports Med.9, 261–266. 10.1055/s-2007-1025018
129
Walter-KrokerA.KrokerA.Mattiucci-GuehlkeM.GlaabT. (2011). A practical guide to bioelectrical impedance analysis using the example of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nutr. J.10, 35–42. 10.1186/1475-2891-10-35
130
WangJ.PiersonR. N. (1976). Disparate hydration of adipose and lean tissue require a new model for body water distribution in man. J. Nutr.106, 1687–1693. 10.1093/jn/106.12.1687
131
WangX.SparksJ. R.BowyerK. P.YoungstedtS. D. (2018). Influence of sleep restriction on weight loss outcomes associated with caloric restriction. Sleep41, 1–11. 10.1093/sleep/zsy027
132
WangZ.HeshkaS.WangJ.GallagherD.DeurenbergP.ChenZ.et al. (2007). Metabolically active portion of fat-free mass: a cellular body composition level modeling analysis. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.292, E49–E53. 10.1152/ajpendo.00485.2005
133
WardL. C. (2019). Bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition assessment: reflections on accuracy, clinical utility, and standardisation. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.73, 194–199. 10.1038/s41430-018-0335-3
134
WestenhoeferJ.EngelD.HolstC.LorenzJ.PeacockM.StubbsJ.et al. (2013). Cognitive and weight-related correlates of flexible and rigid restrained eating behaviour. Eat. Behav.14, 69–72. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.10.015
135
WestenhoeferJ.StunkardA. J.PudelV. (1999). Validation of the flexible and rigid control dimensions of dietary restraint. Int. J. Eat. Disord.26, 53–64.
136
WilsonG.ChesterN.EubankM.CrightonB.DrustB.MortonJ. P.et al. (2012). An alternative dietary strategy to make weight while improving mood, decreasing body fat, and not dehydrating: a case study of a professional jockey. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab.22, 225–231. 10.1123/ijsnem.22.3.225
137
WilsonG.PritchardP. P.PapageorgiouC.PhillipsS.KumarP.Langan-EvansC.et al. (2015). Fasted Exercise and Increased Dietary Protein Reduces Body Fat and Improves Strength in Jockeys. Int. J. Sports Med., 36, 1008–1014. 10.1055/s-0035-1549920
138
WilsonH. V.JohnsonM. I.FrancisP. (2018). Repeated stimulation, inter-stimulus interval and inter-electrode distance alters muscle contractile properties as measured by Tensiomyography. PLoS ONE13:e0191965. 10.1371/journal.pone.0191965
139
WitardO. C.GartheI.PhillipsS. M. (2019). Dietary protein for training adaptation and body composition manipulation in track and field athletes. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 29, 165–174. 10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0267
140
WolfeR. R. (2006). The underappreciated role of muscle in health and disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.84, 475–482. 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.475
141
WoodR. J.FernandezM. L.SharmanM. J.SilvestreR.GreeneC. M.ZernT. L.et al. (2007). Effects of a carbohydrate-restricted diet with and without supplemental soluble fiber on plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other clinical markers of cardiovascular risk. Metab. Clin. Exp.56, 58–67. 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.08.021
142
WurtmanR. J.WurtmanJ. J.ReganM. M.McDermottJ. M.TsayR. H.BreuJ. J. (2003). Effects of normal meals rich in carbohydrates or proteins on plasma tryptophan and tyrosine ratios. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.77, 128–132. 10.1093/ajcn/77.1.128
143
ZhouJ.KimJ. E.ArmstrongC. L.ChenN.CampbellW. W. (2016). Higher-protein diets improve indexes of sleep in energy-restricted overweight and obese adults: results from 2 randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.103, 766–774. 10.3945/ajcn.115.124669
144
ZinderS. M.PaduaD. A. (2011). Reliability, validity, and precision of a handheld myometer for assessing in vivo muscle stiffness. J. Sport Rehabil.20, 1–8. 10.1123/jsr.2010-0051
145
ZubacD.ŠimunićB. (2017). Skeletal muscle contraction time and tone decrease after 8 weeks of plyometric training. J. Strength Cond. Res.31, 1610–1619. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001626
146
ZubacD.ŠimunićB.Buoite StellaA.MorrisonS. A. (2020). Neuromuscular performance after rapid weight loss in Olympic-style boxers. Eur. J. Sport Sci.20, 1051–1060. 10.1080/17461391.2019.1695954
147
ZubacD.ŠimunićB.HrvojeK.IvancevV. (2017). Skeletal muscle contraction time is an important factor in the muscle damage response in kickboxing athletes. Arch. Budo13, 169–178.
Summary
Keywords
fat-free-mass, Tensiomyography, muscle quality, sports nutrition, proteolysis
Citation
Roth C, Rettenmaier L and Behringer M (2021) High-Protein Energy-Restriction: Effects on Body Composition, Contractile Properties, Mood, and Sleep in Active Young College Students. Front. Sports Act. Living 3:683327. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.683327
Received
20 March 2021
Accepted
18 May 2021
Published
15 June 2021
Volume
3 - 2021
Edited by
Karsten Koehler, Technical University of Munich, Germany
Reviewed by
Alexander Carswell, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom; Amy Knab, Queens University of Charlotte, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Roth, Rettenmaier and Behringer.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Christian Roth roth@sport.uni-frankfurt.de
This article was submitted to Sport and Exercise Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.