- 1Faculty of Education, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- 2Escuela de Fisioterapia, Universidad de las Americas, Quito, Ecuador
- 3School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical, Health and Life Sciences, International University of Ecuador, UIDE, Quito, Ecuador
- 4Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Odontología y Ciencias de la Rehabilitación, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile
- 5Departamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile
- 6School of Medicine, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador
- 7Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile
Background: The first year of university has been identified as a period of adoption of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. However, only a few studies have addressed the extent of this phenomenon in Latin American universities. The aim of this study was to examine changes in physiotherapy students' lifestyle behaviors after one year at university.
Methods: A total of 100 students of Universidad de Las Americas in Quito, Ecuador, were prospectively recruited. In all patients' sociodemographic variables, anthropometric indices, adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines (i.e., physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep), diet, and alcohol consumption were assessed. Measurements were performed at the start of the first academic semester and after one year at university.
Results: The total of sample, 60 students were female (60%), 40 were male (40%), and the mean age was 21.2 years old. At one-year follow-up, the mean difference (MD) for weight was +5.8 kg [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9 to 8.5; p < 0.001] and for body mass index was +3.3 kg/m2 (95% CI: 1.1 to 5.2; p = 0.001). Additionally, number of students with high levels of physical activity according to the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) decreased from 42 to 28 (p < 0.001), the MD for total metabolic equivalents (METs) per week was −1.0 (95% CI −0.8 to −2.0; p = 0.001), and decreased from 10 to 6 students (p = 0.042) who met the overall 24-hour movement guidelines. Finally, there was an increase from 70 to 79 students (p = 0.041) who showed significant sleep disturbances, from 70 to 80 students (p = 0.035) who needed changes in diet quality, and from 20 to 30 students (p = 0.035) who showed harmful alcohol consumption.
Conclusions: At the end of the first year of university, most students showed unhealthy lifestyle behaviors characterized by an increase in weight and body mass index, a decrease in the level of physical activity, low adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines, more sleep disturbance, poor diet quality, and harmful alcohol consumption. This indicates a need to address this problem during this critical period for developing interventions to improve lifestyle behaviors and prevent the occurrence of non-communicable chronic diseases.
1 Introduction
University presents a time of transition for young adults that involves behavior adaptation in a new environment, with new relationships and changing support systems (1). University students are in a period of transition to adulthood marked by important lifestyle changes (2, 3). Indeed, when analyzing patterns of lifestyle change over the lifespan, a critical time for negative lifestyle behaviors appears to be in later adolescence and early adulthood (4–6). In this sense, the first year of university is a critical period because it is associated with the adoption of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, where students experience changes in eating behaviors, physical activity, sleep patterns, and alcohol consumption (7–9).
Consequently, several meta-analyses have reported that the first year of university is accompanied by important changes in lifestyle behavior characterized by an increase in weight and percentage of body fat, changes in diet quality or eating behaviors, and decreased levels of physical activity (2, 8, 10–13). The main behaviors associated with weight gain were the consumption of sugary drinks, alcohol consumption, low consumption of vegetables and fruits, frequent self-consumption, eating unhealthy and low levels of food regulation (13). Moreover, a global survey of 23 countries with different income levels showed that 21.9% to 80.6% of university students are physically inactive (14). On the other hand, the transition to university life often leads students to modify their dietary habits, sleep patterns, and alcohol consumption due to increased autonomy, academic pressures, and new social environments (2, 12, 15).
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a healthy lifestyle involves regular physical exercise, abstention from smoking, avoiding alcohol consumption, and eating healthy foods to prevent excess body weight gain (16). Currently, evidence supports that aspects of movement behavior such as levels of physical activity, sedentary time, and duration of sleep are interconnected as they occur throughout the 24-hour day, and thus, they should be assessed collectively (17, 18). In line with this, in a previous cross-sectional study, we reported that upon admission to university, overall adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines is low, and a high percentage of physiotherapy students reported unhealthy lifestyle behaviors in Ecuador (6).
Several studies have analyzed changes in lifestyle behaviors at one or more years of follow-up in university students (5, 7, 19–22). However, only one published study has been performed in Latin American university students (9). Given the scarcity of published data about the behavior of these variables in this population. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine changes in lifestyle behavior, such as physical activity, sleep quality and duration, adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines, diet, and alcohol consumption in physiotherapy students after one year in the Universidad de Las Americas in Quito, Ecuador.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Design/ethics
This prospective observational study was conducted following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (23). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research on Human Beings of Universidad de Las Americas (Ecuador) (ID: 2022-OBS-008) and received funding from Universidad de Las Americas with sponsor code FIS.HGE.23.01. In the second semester of 2022 and the first semester of 2023, all students entering the physiotherapy school were prospectively recruited (116 students). All participants signed an informed consent form approved by the ethics committee.
2.2 Participants
We included all students from 18 years old who entered physiotherapy school at the Universidad de Las Americas in the city of Quito, Ecuador, during two academic semesters and who were current students of the program at one-year follow-up. Conversely, students were excluded if they had the following conditions: (i) any uncontrolled comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or hypercholesterolemia; or (ii) physical impairments associated with neurological diseases or mental illness.
2.3 Outcomes measures
Two evaluators from the scientific staff assessed the variables at the start of the first academic semester and after one year at university. Before the study began, these evaluators with postgraduate qualifications in Kinanthropometry received two weeks of training to standardize the measurements. Both assessed the same proportion of participants.
2.3.1 Sociodemographic and comorbidity variables
Age, sex, socioeconomic status (high, middle, or low), and work occupation parallel to study; middle-time (10 to 22 hours per week), part-time (less than 10 hours per week), or not working were assessed for each participant. Comorbidity data, including hypertension (defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg, or receiving treatment with an antihypertensive agent), diabetes mellitus (defined as a fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl, Glycated Hemoglobin A1c > 6.5%, or treatment with a hypoglycemic agent or insulin) and hypercholesterolemia (defined as levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >130 mg/dl), were also assessed.
2.3.2 Anthropometric variables
Participants had their waist circumference measured in a bipedal position using a non-elastic tape placed midway between the costal margins and the iliac crest in the horizontal plane. Height was measured barefoot using a Seca 213 stadiometer, ensuring the sagittal midline touched the backboard. Body weight, measured with a Tanita HD-351, was taken with participants barefoot and in light clothing. These measurement procedures align with the recommendations of the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry. Finally, body mass index (BMI) was computed as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters, and the BMI values were used to determine nutritional status following the WHO standards (24).
2.3.3 Physical activity
The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) was used to assess the level of physical activity (20). The GPAQ is a validated 16-item scale that measures moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity in three separate domains such as work, recreation, and active transportation domains during a typical week (25). The GPAQ has been established as a valid and reliable instrument to measure physical activity among university students (26).
2.3.4 Sleep quality and duration
The assessment of sleep quality and duration utilized the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire (27). This self-rated questionnaire consists of 19 items and evaluates sleep quality over a one-month period. The total score, ranging from 0 to 21, indicates sleep quality, with higher scores suggesting poorer sleep quality. A total score exceeding five points indicates significant sleep disturbance (27). The Spanish version of the PSQI is recognized as a valid and reliable instrument for measuring sleep quality (28).
2.3.5 Adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines
To assess adherence to the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for adults, participants must meet the following conditions: (a) engage in at least 150 min per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, incorporating muscle-strengthening activities at least twice a week; (b) limit sedentary time to no more than eight hours daily and recreational screen time to no more than three hours daily; and (c) maintain a nightly sleep duration of seven to nine hours (17). Based on data obtained from personal assessments and two self-report questionnaires (25, 27), participants meeting all three criteria were categorized as compliant with the guidelines (17).
2.3.6 Diet
Diet quality was assessed with the Spanish version of the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) (29). Participants' diets were classified according to the total score and divided into three categories: >80 points, “healthy”; 50–80 points, “needs changes”; and <50 points, “unhealthy”. This is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring dietary quality (30).
2.3.7 Alcohol consumption
Alcohol consumption was assessed with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) (31). This questionnaire is specifically designed to assess hazardous alcohol consumption. Scores on the AUDIT range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicative of an elevated risk of problematic alcohol consumption (31). A total score exceeding eight points is considered a cutoff point indicating harmful alcohol consumption (32). The Ecuadorian adaptation of the Spanish version of the AUDIT has demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (33).
2.4 Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sociodemographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle variables of the participants. Continuous variables are presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables are presented as the number and percentage. To determine the statistical tests for use in data analysis, we used Shapiro–Wilk statistical test. For continuous variables, a paired t-test was used to determine the differences between the data at baseline and one-year follow-up, and the McNemar test was used for categorical variables. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 (Stata, College Station, TX, USA).
3 Results
Of the 120 students considered for eligibility, 2 students were excluded due to uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, and 2 declined participation. Finally, 116 students were initially recruited; however, 16 dropped out during their first year of University. Therefore, 100 students were included in this study (Figure 1). Characteristics, sociodemographics, and anthropometrics of the students included are shown in Table 1. Of these 100 university students included; 60 were female (60%), 40 were male (40), and the mean age was 21.2 years old (SD = 1). A total of 70 students (70%) reported middle socioeconomic status, and 80 (80%) were not working. Additionally, 80 students (80%) did not present any diagnosed comorbidity (hypertension, diabetes mellitus or hypercholesterolemia). According to stratified BMI, 40 students (40%) had normal weight, 40 (40%) were overweight, and 19 (19%) had obesity.
Additionally, changes in the continuous anthropometrics and lifestyle variables between the baseline and one-year follow-up are shown in Table 2. The mean difference (MD) for weight was +5.8 kg [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9 to 8.5; p < 0.001] and for BMI was +3.3 kg/m2 (95% CI: 1.1 to 5.2; p = 0.001). The MDs for PSQI and AUDIT questionnaires increased by 1.0 point each (both p-values were less than 0.05).
Changes in categorical anthropometric and lifestyle variables between the baseline and one-year follow-up are shown in Table 3. Figure 2 shows the number of students with high levels of physical activity according to GPAQ, the Figure 3 shows the number of students experiencing significant sleep disturbances (PSQI > 5 points), the Figure 4 shows the number of students with harmful alcohol use (AUDIT > 8 points). Finally, the Figure 5 shows the number of students that meeting all recommendations of adherence to the overall 24-hour movement guidelines.

Figure 2. Changes in the number of students with high levels of physical activity according to GPAQ. *Statistically significant difference (p < 0.001).

Figure 3. Changes in the number of students with significant sleep disturbances according to PSQI. *Statistically significant difference (p < 0.041).

Figure 4. Changes in the number of students number of students with harmful alcohol use according to AUDIT. *Statistically significant difference (p < 0.035).

Figure 5. Changes in the number of students that meeting all recommendations of adherence to the overall 24-hour movement guidelines. *Statistically significant difference (p < 0.042).
4 Discussion
This observational study aimed to examine changes in lifestyle behavior in physiotherapy students after one year at the Universidad de Las Americas in Quito, Ecuador. The main findings of our study were, at the end of the first year of university, most students transitioned to unhealthy lifestyle behaviors characterized by an increase in weight and BMI, a decrease in the level of physical activity, low adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines, more sleep disturbance, a poor diet quality, and harmful alcohol consumption.
Our findings confirm the observations that the trend of unhealthy lifestyles and poor dietary habits is increasing at the end of the first year of university (5, 7, 9). Although, most of these studies were not conducted in health students. This could be a factor that modifies the results due to these students' having greater knowledge of lifestyle behaviors (34). Despite, this trend can be attributed to numerous factors, including peer pressure, being away from home for a considerable number of hours, the pressure of studying, accessibility of fast foods, and the limited choices of healthy foods on university campuses, in addition to the influence of social media (3, 35). Accordingly, universities should implement prevention and promotion strategies that modify university settings to improve healthy lifestyle behaviors among their students (6).
Regarding weight gain, two meta-analyses reported that university students gain an average of 1.75 kg and 1.55 kg during their first year, respectively (10, 11). Likewise, another meta-analysis reported that first-year university students, on average, gained 1.36 kg over a period of six weeks to eight months. Indeed, 60.9% of students gained weight, and within those, the average weight gained was 3.38 kg (8). It is important to highlight that these meta-analyses do not include studies conducted in Latin America. Our findings agree with a study conducted in Faculty of Health students of one private University of Chile, which reported that students gain an average of 5.9 kg at the end of their first year of university (9).
There is consensus that a critical time for the increase in the prevalence of overweight/obesity appears to be in later adolescence and early adulthood (36). During this period, there is a significant decrease in the level of physical activity (37). According with our findings, another study showed a decrease of 147.9 total METs at one year of follow-up from the upon admission to university (9). Given the low levels of physical activity and unhealthy eating, it is not surprising that the prevalence of overweight/obesity has reached epidemic proportions in young adults in the last decade (38). At the end of the follow-up, the students significantly increased the proportion of overweight/obesity and decreased levels of physical activity. According to our findings, a systematic review reported that insufficient activity is a serious health concern among university students (39). Despite this, there are no studies that have analyzed whether the levels of physical inactivity in students belonging to health careers are similar to those in other careers or faculties. We think that our results could be influenced because our cohort were physiotherapy students, however, similar studies are lacking to compare our findings.
Adequate sleep quality and duration have a critical role in optimal physical health, immune function, mental health, and cognition (40). Unfortunately, attending university is often associated with insufficient sleep (41). After one year of university, 79 students (79%) of our sample had significant sleep disturbance. Usually, factors such as reduced parental support, increased stress from academic loads, and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors result in sleep disorders in this population (42). There are also no studies that have compared sleep quality between students from health faculties and students from other faculties. We could hypothesize that faculties of health students having a better awareness of sleep health and therefore having better sleep habits, which could improve their sleep quality in some degree. However, further research are needed to close this knowledge gap.
Currently, no published studies have evaluated changes in adherence to the overall 24-hour movement guidelines among Latin American university students. Despite this, one study conducted in eight Latin American countries reported that the proportion of adults (aged 18 to 64 years old) who met all three of the 24-hour movement guidelines was low (1.6%) (43). Interestingly, this study showed that sociodemographic factors such as being a woman and having a middle or high education level were associated with a lower probability of meeting all three guidelines (43). Consistent with these findings, our study reports that only six students (6%) met the overall 24-hour movement guidelines. Unfortunately, the lack of similar published studies of Latin American university students prevents us from comparing our findings within this geographical location.
University is often associated with students having more autonomy over their dietary choices. Specifically, factors such as cost, skipping meals, inadequate variety of foods, snacking, and frequent consumption of fast foods increase students' risk of poor health (38). Previous studies have shown that students' diets are characterized by low consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables, monounsaturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and fish, coupled with increased intake of sugar, alcohol, and fast food (2, 5, 7, 44). Consistent with these findings, our study revealed that 80 students (80%) in the sample exhibited a need for improvements in diet quality and reported engaging in unhealthy eating habits.
In our study, we report a total of 30 students (30%) with harmful alcohol consumption. Consistent with our findings, another study of university students in Ecuador reported that the prevalence of harmful alcohol consumption, above the cutoff score of eight in the AUDIT questionnaire, was high. Almost 50% of male students and 25% of female students reported harmful alcohol consumption (33). The rates of harmful alcohol consumption reported in our study are similar to Europe and South America (where rates range between 23% and 33% for males and 10% and 22% for females) (45).
4.1 Limitations and strengths
This study has several limitations. First, as this was an observational study, it did not include a comparison group of young adults who did not attend university but who may also have significant lifestyle changes. Second, these findings should be interpreted with caution, since this research does not allow establishing causality and we also do not have a half-time or medium-term measurement. Third, self-report questionnaire was used for the assessment physical activity level, which can introduce response bias due to over- or underestimation of actual activity levels. Fourth, our study was performed only on students at a private university physiotherapy school. An important factor to consider is that majority of healthcare students have major knowledge about good lifestyles. This may mean that when carrying out the different surveys their perception could be influenced by their acquired knowledge considering cognitive discordance. Therefore, our findings cannot be generalized to all university students. Conversely, this is the first study in Ecuadorian university students with 1-year follow-up to evaluate adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines, diet, and alcohol consumption.
Conclusion
At the end of the first year of university, most students showed unhealthy lifestyle behaviors characterized by an increase in weight and BMI, a decrease in the level of physical activity, low adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines, more sleep disturbance, poor diet quality, and harmful alcohol consumption. This indicates a need to address this problem during this critical period for developing interventions to improve lifestyle behaviors and prevent the occurrence of non-communicable chronic diseases. In the university, there is significant scope to implement specific strategies to foster healthier lifestyles in their students. However, more research is needed in Latin American universities.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research on Human Beings of Universidad de Las Americas of Ecuador (ID: 2022-OBS-008). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
HG-E: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. MC-C: Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EG-U: Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DC-L: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FA-Q: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JV-F: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JL-G: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the regular research fund of the Universidad de Las Americas of Ecuador (Grant number: FIS.HGE.23.01). The funder was not involved in the research design, data analysis, or drafting of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Cluskey M, Grobe D. College weight gain and behavior transitions: male and female differences. J Am Diet Assoc. (2009) 109(2):325–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.045
2. Winpenny EM, Smith M, Penney T, Foubister C, Guagliano JM, Love R, et al. Changes in physical activity, diet, and body weight across the education and employment transitions of early adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. (2020) 21(4):e12962. doi: 10.1111/obr.12962
3. Al-Awwad NJ, Al-Sayyed HF, Zeinah ZA, Tayyem RF. Dietary and lifestyle habits among university students at different academic years. Clin Nutr ESPEN. (2021) 44:236–42. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.06.010
4. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. (2017) 390(10113):2627–42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3
5. Beaudry KM, Ludwa IA, Thomas AM, Ward WE, Falk B, Josse AR. First-year university is associated with greater body weight, body composition and adverse dietary changes in males than females. PLoS One. (2019) 14(7):e0218554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218554
6. Gutiérrez-Espinoza H, Cassola-Cajiao M, Garzón-Ulloa E, Celi-Lalama D, Bastidas-Caldes C, Araya-Quintanilla F, et al. Lifestyle behavior of physiotherapy students from Ecuador upon admission to higher education: a cross-sectional study. Front Sports Act Living. (2024) 6:1352144. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1352144
7. Deforche B, Van Dyck D, Deliens T, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Changes in weight, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary intake during the transition to higher education: a prospective study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2015) 12:16. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0173-9
8. Vadeboncoeur C, Townsend N, Foster C. A meta-analysis of weight gain in first year university students: is freshman 15 a myth? BMC Obes. (2015) 2:22. doi: 10.1186/s40608-015-0051-7
9. Araya-Quintanilla F, Landaeta-Diaz L, Rosati A, Silva-Navarro C, Jeria-Díaz A, Gutiérrez-Espinoza H. Life-style behavior upon admission to higher education in Chilean university students: a longitudinal observational study. Rev Med Chil. (2023) 151(6):725–34. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872023000600725
10. Vella-Zarb RA, Elgar FJ. The “freshman 5”: a meta-analysis of weight gain in the freshman year of college. J Am Coll Health. (2009) 58(2):161–6. doi: 10.1080/07448480903221392
11. Fedewa MV, Das BM, Evans EM, Dishman RK. Change in weight and adiposity in college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. (2014) 47(5):641–52. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.035
12. Maillet MA, Grouzet FME. Understanding changes in eating behavior during the transition to university from a self-determination theory perspective: a systematic review. J Am Coll Health. (2023) 71(2):422–39. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1891922
13. León E, Tabares M, Baile JI, Salazar JG, Zepeda AP. Eating behaviors associated with weight gain among university students worldwide and treatment interventions: a systematic review. J Am Coll Health. (2024) 72(5):1624–31. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2089841
14. Pengpid S, Peltzer K, Kassean HK, Tsala Tsala JP, Sychareun V, Müller-Riemenschneider F. Physical inactivity and associated factors among university students in 23 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Int J Public Health. (2015) 60(5):539–49. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0680-0
15. Wirnitzer KC, Motevalli M, Cocca A, Tanous DR, Wirnitzer G, Wagner KH, et al. Health behavior of Austrian tertiary students focusing on diet type linked to sports and exercise-first glimpse of results from the “sustainably healthy-from science 2 high school and university” study. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1129004. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129004
16. World Health Organization. Healthy living: what is a healthy lifestyle?: WHO Regional Office for Europe. (2010). Available at: https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle—who-recommendations (Accessed July 15, 2024).
17. Ross R, Chaput JP, Giangregorio LM, Janssen I, Saunders TJ, Kho ME, et al. Canadian 24-Hour movement guidelines for adults aged 18–64 years and adults aged 65 years or older: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. (2020) 45(10 (Suppl. 2)):S57–S102. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0467
18. Tapia-Serrano MA, Sevil-Serrano J, Sánchez-Miguel PA, López-Gil JF, Tremblay MS, García-Hermoso A. Prevalence of meeting 24-hour movement guidelines from pre-school to adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 387,437 participants and 23 countries. J Sport Health Sci. (2022) 11(4):427–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2022.01.005
19. Deliens T, Deforche B, Chapelle L, Clarys P. Changes in weight and body composition across five years at university: a prospective observational study. PLoS One. (2019) 14(11):e0225187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225187
20. Kriaucioniene V, Raskiliene A, Petrauskas D, Petkeviciene J. Trends in eating habits and body weight Status, perception patterns and management practices among first-year students of kaunas (Lithuania) universities, 2000–2017. Nutrients. (2021) 13(5):1599. doi: 10.3390/nu13051599
21. Olansky S, Beaudry KM, Woods S, Barbour-Tuck E, Gammage KL, Klentrou P, et al. Changes in body composition, energy expenditure, and energy intake during four years of university-A follow-up study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18(8):3990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083990
22. Du C, Luo N, Wu L, Gadd S, Zhang X, Tucker RM. Health behavior changes associated with weight gain among first-year international students studying at an American university. J Am Coll Health. (2023) 71(1):300–9. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1891082
23. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. (2014) 12(12):1495–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013
24. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. (2000) 894:i–xii. 1–253.11234459
25. World Health Organization. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) Analysis Guide. Geneva: World Health Organization (2012). Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/ncds/ncd-surveillance/gpaq-analysis-guide.pdf
26. Ndupu LB, Faghy M, Staples V, Lipka S, Bussell C. Exploring the predictors of physical inactivity in a university setting. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14953-5
27. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh sleep quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. (1989) 28(2):193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
28. Reyes-Molina D, Alonso-Cabrera J, Nazar G, Parra-Rizo MA, Zapata-Lamana R, Sanhueza-Campos C, et al. Association between the physical activity behavioral profile and sedentary time with subjective well-being and mental health in Chilean university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19(4):2107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042107
29. Norte Navarro AI, Ortiz Moncada R. Calidad de la dieta española según el índice de alimentación saludable. Nutr Hosp. (2011) 26(2):330–6. doi: 10.1590/s0212-16112011000200014
30. Reedy J, Lerman JL, Krebs-Smith SM, Kirkpatrick SI, Pannucci TE, Wilson MM, et al. Evaluation of the healthy eating index-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. (2018) 118(9):1622–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.019
31. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Monteiro MG. AUDIT. the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization (2001). Available at: https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/activities/en/AUDITmanualSpanish.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
32. Berner MM, Kriston L, Bentele M, Härter M. The alcohol use disorders identification test for detecting at-risk drinking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. (2007) 68(3):461–73. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.461
33. López V, Paladines B, Vaca S, Cacho R, Fernández-Montalvo J, Ruisoto P. Psychometric properties and factor structure of an Ecuadorian version of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in college students. PLoS One. (2019) 14(7):e0219618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219618
34. Oberg EB, Frank E. Physicians’ health practices strongly influence patient health practices. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. (2009) 39(4):290–1. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2009.422
35. Deshpande S, Basil MD, Basil DZ. Factors influencing healthy eating habits among college students: an application of the health belief model. Health Mark Q. (2009) 26(2):145–64. doi: 10.1080/07359680802619834
36. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Height and body-mass index trajectories of school-aged children and adolescents from 1985 to 2019 in 200 countries and territories: a pooled analysis of 2181 population-based studies with 65 million participants. Lancet. (2020) 396(10261):1511–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31859-6
37. Corder K, Winpenny E, Love R, Brown HE, White M, Sluijs EV. Change in physical activity from adolescence to early adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. (2019) 53(8):496–503. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097330
38. Plotnikoff RC, Costigan SA, Williams RL, Hutchesson MJ, Kennedy SG, Robards SL, et al. Effectiveness of interventions targeting physical activity, nutrition and healthy weight for university and college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2015) 12:45. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0203-7
39. Irwin JD. Prevalence of university students’ sufficient physical activity: a systematic review. Percept Mot Skills. (2004) 98(3 Pt 1):927–43. doi: 10.2466/pms.98.3.927-943
40. Irwin MR. Why sleep is important for health: a psychoneuroimmunology perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. (2015) 66:143–72. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115205
41. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Sleep duration and health correlates among university students in 26 countries. Psychol Health Med. (2016) 21(2):208–20. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2014.998687
42. Chandler L, Patel C, Lovecka L, Gardani M, Walasek L, Ellis J, et al. Improving university students’ mental health using multi-component and single-component sleep interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med. (2022) 100:354–63. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.09.003
43. Ferrari G, Alberico C, Drenowatz C, Kovalskys I, Gómez G, Rigotti A, et al. Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of meeting the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines among Latin American adults: a multi-national cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2022) 22(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12613-2
44. Correa-Rodríguez M, Pocovi G, Schmidt-RioValle J, González-Jiménez E, Rueda-Medina B. Assessment of dietary intake in Spanish university students of health sciences. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). (2018) 65(5):265–73. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2018.01.005
Keywords: lifestyle behavior, anthropometry, sleep quality, 24-hour movement guidelines, university students, observational study
Citation: Gutiérrez-Espinoza H, Cassola-Cajiao M, Garzón-Ulloa E, Celi-Lalama D, Araya-Quintanilla F, Valenzuela-Fuenzalida J and López-Gil JF (2025) Changes in the lifestyle behavior and anthropometrics of university students after the first year: a one-year prospective observational study. Front. Sports Act. Living 7:1499828. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1499828
Received: 21 September 2024; Accepted: 6 May 2025;
Published: 20 May 2025.
Edited by:
David Broom, Coventry University, United KingdomReviewed by:
Ferdinand Salonna, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, SlovakiaKatharina Christina Wirnitzer, Pedagogical University Tyrol, Austria
Andy Smith, Independent Researcher, London, United Kingdom
Copyright: © 2025 Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Cassola-Cajiao, Garzón-Ulloa, Celi-Lalama, Araya-Quintanilla, Valenzuela-Fuenzalida and López-Gil. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: José Francisco López-Gil, am9zZWZyYW5jaXNjb2xvcGV6Z2lsQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==