Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Elite Sports and Performance Enhancement

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1519987

This article is part of the Research TopicIntegrating Sleep, Nutrition, and Mental Health in Student-Athletes: A Holistic Approach to Performance and Well-beingView all 3 articles

The influence of partial sleep restriction on repeated sprint ability and reaction time in university athletes

Provisionally accepted
Benjamin  Roy WannellBenjamin Roy WannellFelix  Marco James BrunnerFelix Marco James BrunnerZoe  Natasha LovibondZoe Natasha LovibondBert  BondBert Bond*
  • University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Few studies have assessed the influence of acute sleep restriction on repeated sprint ability and reaction time, which are important characteristics of many sports. Additionally, no within-measures study has compared the acute effect of interrupting sleep to an equivalent quantity of sleep lost by going to bed late. This study examined the influence of sleep restriction, achieved by going to sleep late, or by interrupting sleep, on repeated sprint ability and reaction time. Sixteen university team sport players completed 3 conditions in a counterbalanced order; 1) normal sleep ("Control"), 2) 50% sleep loss achieved by going to be late ("Late"), and 3) 50% sleep loss achieved by waking in the middle of their scheduled sleep ("Interrupt"). The following morning, participants completed ten, 8 s all-out cycle sprints, each separated by 52 s recovery. Reaction time to a Go/No-Go test was measured during each recovery interval. Peak and minimum power output for each repeated sprint interval was always lower in the Late (mean difference (MD) -17 W, P=0.014, and MD -14 W, P=0.022) and Interrupt conditions (MD -25 W, P<0.001 and MD -24 W, P<0.001), compared to Control. Additionally, average power output was lower across all sprint attempts in Interrupt (MD -14 W, P=0.007), but not Late (MD -7 W, P=0.170) compared to Control. Reaction time was never different between conditions. One night of 50% sleep loss can acutely impair repeated sprint ability. Interrupting sleep might be more deleterious than an equivalent amount of sleep lost through late sleep onset.

Keywords: sleep restriction, exercise performance, Sprint interval exercise, University sport, sleep quality

Received: 30 Oct 2024; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wannell, Brunner, Lovibond and Bond. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Bert Bond, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.