ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1549026
This article is part of the Research TopicMultidisciplinary Perspectives on Team Sports: Contextualizing Training and Competition Demands -Volume IIView all 12 articles
Unlocking the Training Process: How Different Training Tasks Shape the Physiology and Biomechanics of Professional Futsal Players
Provisionally accepted- 1Universidad Europea de Madrid, Department of Sports Sciences. Faculty of Medicine, Health and Sports., Madrid, Spain
- 2Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Castelo Branco, Portugal
- 3CIFD Sports Research and Training Center, Jean Piaget University of Angola, Luanda, Angola
- 4School of Education, Communication and Sports,, Instituto Politécnico da Guarda, Guarda, Guarda, Portugal
- 5University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
- 6Portugal Football School, Portuguese Football Federation, Oeiras, Portugal
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Despite the characterization of physical and technical tactical demands of futsal SSCGs, there remains a need to better understand the physiological and biomechanical loads of each training task to determine its workload during training sessions further. The present study aims to analyze and classify the physiological and biomechanical demands of different futsal training tasks in order to enhance the understanding of these demands and their implications for elite futsal players' performance. Methods: Conducted over three seasons with a professional futsal team, the research systematically categorized training exercises into six task types: introductory, analytical, mid-court, ¾ court, full-court, and superiority/inferiority tasks. The WIMU PROTM device was used to monitor physiological and biomechanical metrics and to assess how variations in task type influence. Results: Superiority/inferiority tasks, followed by full-court tasks, showed significantly higher physiological and biomechanical loads compared with introductory, analytical, and mid-court tasks. These differences (p ≤ 0.05) were associated with higher values of rate average, total distance covered, and high-speed running per minute for the physiological load, as well as greater number of accelerations, decelerations, and player load per minute for the biomechanical load. Discussion: A visual four-quadrant efforts assessment provided insights into the contribution of each task category through its specific load distribution, revealing significant variations associated with player numbers, field dimensions, and task objectives. These findings suggest that specific task configurations can be strategically used to optimize training outcomes by aligning physical demands with coaching objectives.
Keywords: team sport, performance, Workload, Data-visualization, LPS
Received: 08 Jan 2025; Accepted: 19 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Serrano, Ferraz, Ribeiro, Ibañez and Travassos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: João Nuno Ribeiro, Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, 6201-001, Castelo Branco, Portugal
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.