Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Physical Education and Pedagogy

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1580697

This article is part of the Research TopicAdapted Physical Activity: Inclusion in Physical Education and SportsView all 3 articles

Bonheur en boule: An Adapted Group-Based Physical Activity Program for Youth with Disabilities

Provisionally accepted
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Youth with disabilities face significant barriers to physical activity (PA) participation, despite its documented benefits across cognitive, social, affective, and physical domains. Physical literacy (PL) and self-determination theory (SDT) offer complementary frameworks for designing adapted PA programs that foster autonomy, competence, and relatedness. However, limited research integrates both frameworks in adapted PA programs. This study evaluates the impact of Bonheur en boule (BEB), an adapted group-based PA program, on basic psychological needs, global self-esteem, and PA intentions of youth with disabilities while also assessing parental satisfaction.Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used. Eleven youth (Mage = 13.27, SD = 5.42) with various disabilities participated in the BEB program, consisting of two 15-week sessions of adapted Dek Hockey (Ball hockey). Quantitative measures assessed participants' basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness), global selfesteem, and PA intentions at three time points. Non-parametric tests (Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank) were used for statistical analyses. Parent satisfaction was evaluated through semi-structured interviews, analyzed using content analysis.Results: Significant improvements were observed across all three basic psychological needs and global self-esteem. Competence and autonomy satisfaction increased notably between the first and second time points (p < .01), while global self-esteem improved later in the program (p < .01). All participants (n = 11) expressed intentions to continue both PA and the program. Parental feedback highlighted positive changes in children's cognitive (e.g., attention, problem-solving), social (e.g., friendships, teamwork), affective (e.g., emotional regulation, confidence), and physical (e.g., motor skills, endurance) development. Parents also valued the program's inclusive approach and flexibility. Discussion: Findings suggest that an SDT and PL based PA program can foster satisfaction of basic psychological needs leading to self-determination, increase global self-esteem and support PA engagement among youth with disabilities. The program's structure, emphasizing autonomy, competence, and social connections, contributed to participant development. Parents' strong appreciation underscores the program's perceived effectiveness. However, challenges such as small sample size and the lack of a control group limit generalizability.BEB demonstrates the feasibility of an adapted PA program rooted in SDT and PL principles, showing promising outcomes for youth with disabilities. Future research should explore long-term behavioral impacts and broader implementation strategies.

Keywords: Physical Literacy, self-determination theory, disabilities, Adapted physical activity, Youth, Program, intervention

Received: 20 Feb 2025; Accepted: 15 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 D'Amours, Girard, Miquelon and Veillette. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jason D'Amours, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.