ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Sport Psychology
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1596298
This article is part of the Research TopicMental Health in Recreational and Elite SportsView all 26 articles
Effect of Attentional Bias Modification on Pre-competition Anxiety in Athletes
Provisionally accepted- 1Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
- 2School of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Under high-pressure situations, such as crucial games, some athletes often underperform. This is the case even for exceptional athletes in critical moments of competition.Athletes often experience performance anxiety, which creates attentional errors and underperformance. Attentional bias, where emotional stimuli influence decision-making, may also result in selective attention to negative information. Attentional bias correction training (ABMT) aims to modify these attention patterns with the aim of alleviating anxiety symptoms. In this study, we investigated the pre-competition attention patterns among high-level athletes to enhance performance.Methods: Attentional bias correction training was employed to train 32 athletes for four weeks, every two days (emotional pictures for the experimental group and star pictures for the control group). A point detection paradigm was also utilized to test the athletes' attentional bias behavior in a pre-competition anxiety situation before and after training.The results revealed a significant main effect of test time on self-rated anxiety level of high-level athletes (F(1,32)=204.072, P<0.001, η²p=0.919), while the main effect of group was not significant (F(1,32)=0.505, P>0.05, η²p=0.025). Moreover, significant interaction was recorded between the test time and group (F(1,32)=124.895, P<0.001, η²p=0.874). In the simple effects analysis, high-level athletes in the experimental group had significantly lower pre-competition anxiety scores at the post-test than at the pre-test (43.90±2.57 vs. 57.00±2.77, P<0.001). However, for the control group, there was no significant difference between the two groups (52.20±2.57 vs. 53.80±2.77, P=0.133). In addition, the attentional bias scores were significantly different before and after the training (5.985±1.045 vs. -0.613±0.60, P<0.05) in the experimental group, whereas there were no significant differences in the control group (7.813±1.045 vs. 5.773±0.613, P>0.05).The present findings demonstrate that attentional bias correction training can effectively reduce pre-match anxiety and attentional bias toward negative information in high-level athletes. These results provide an important foundation for enhancing pre-competition attention training and mood regulation in athletes. Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms and practical applications of these findings to facilitate the development of strategies to improve pre-match attention training.
Keywords: Attentional bias correction, attentional bias, Athletes, pre-game anxiety, Basketball player
Received: 19 Mar 2025; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhao, Yang, Wang, Zhang and Nie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Qiulin Wang, School of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.