Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Physical Activity in the Prevention and Management of Disease

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1633086

Scoping review to assess the reach, effectiveness, and impact of government-funded and population-based physical activity initiatives in Australian adults

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Wayville, Australia
  • 2Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
  • 3Preventive Health SA, Adelaide, Australia
  • 4University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

In Australia, physical activity initiatives are often implemented by state and federal governments to improve population physical activity levels. Given the complexity and variability of government-funded physical activity programs, a scoping review is needed to synthesise the available evidence to identify the gaps in initiatives. The aim of this review is to explore the reach, effectiveness, and impact of government-funded population-based physical activity initiatives in Australian adults through a scoping review. This scoping review followed the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and ProQuest Public Health were searched from January 2000 to April 2024. Search terms included relevant terms surrounding the main topics of 'physical activity', 'intervention', 'population-based', 'government-funded', and 'Australia'. Grey literature sources collected from websites of relevant organisations, health agencies of Australian states and territories, and other government departments. A manual search of references listed in primary sources was conducted to find journal articles missed by the search. A narrative synthesis of included studies was conducted. In total, 6,127 sources were identified, with 71 sources included in the final review. The peer review studies, and grey literature evaluation reports identified physical activity initiatives across all Australian states and at the national level. However, Queensland and Victoria provided more physical activity interventions, strategies, and action plans compared to other states. The most common intervention strategies employed were digital platforms and a combination of multiple strategies. Most of these initiatives increased physical activity, however the overall reach of initiatives to the broader Australian population was limited. The initiatives had positive impacts on individuals' health (e.g., weight, mitigating chronic diseases) and wellbeing (e.g., developing social connections). Although these initiatives have demonstrated improvements in physical activity and community health and wellbeing, they have only reached a small fraction of the Australian population. This review highlights need for National Physical Activity Plan. While many states have published high-quality strategies and actions, there is a pressing need for actual implementation of initiatives and evaluations to assess effectiveness. Future research should focus on standardising evaluation frameworks and exploring strategies to enhance initiative sustainability and effectiveness, particularly in diverse populations.

Keywords: physical activity, Government-funded, population-based, Initiatives, effectiveness, reach, impact, Australia

Received: 02 Jun 2025; Accepted: 28 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Dissanayaka Mudiyanselage, Chappel, Irwin, Fisher, Crozier and Vandelanotte. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Charuni Hansika Bambaradeniya Dissanayaka Mudiyanselage, Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Wayville, Australia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.