Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Biomechanics and Control of Human Movement

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1646326

Functional Range of Motion for Basic Seated Activities of Daily Living Tasks

Provisionally accepted
Yuji  InagakiYuji Inagaki1*Tomoya  IshidaTomoya Ishida1Hiroyuki  SugimoriHiroyuki Sugimori1Takaaki  YoshimuraTakaaki Yoshimura1Akihiro  WatanabeAkihiro Watanabe1Yumene  NaitoYumene Naito2Daisuke  SawamuraDaisuke Sawamura1*
  • 1Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
  • 2Kobe Daigaku, Kobe, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Efficient performance of activities of daily living (ADLs) requires coordinated movement across multiple upper-limb joints. However, current assessments of joint range of motion (ROM) during ADLs often rely on subjective evaluation and lack precise quantitative data. The functional ROM required for upper-limb movements in a seated position remains unclear, despite its clinical relevance for older adults and individuals with mobility limitations who frequently perform ADLs while seated. Additionally, little is known about how joint-motion requirements differ across similar ADL tasks, such as eating with a spoon versus chopsticks or washing the top versus the back of the head. To address these issues, we aimed to establish standardized ROM values for common upper-limb-related ADLs using three-dimensional motion analysis to enhance rehabilitation goal setting. Methods: Thirty-one healthy adults (14 women; mean age 22.9 ± 1.9 years) completed six seated ADLs-face washing; hair washing (top, back); chopstick or spoon eating; bottled-water drinking. Marker-based motion capture (International Society of Biomechanics guidelines) recorded kinematics. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests (p < 0.05) assessed task differences.Results: Significant differences in upper limb and neck joint angles were observed across ADL tasks. Shoulder elevation was highest during back hair washing (105.0 ± 14.6°) and lowest when eating with chopsticks (39.2 ± 10.9°). Elbow flexion peaked during face washing (122.3 ± 5.2°) and back hair washing (127.9 ± 5.7°), reflecting the need for close hand-to-face contact. Wrist extension was greatest during face washing (-28.7 ± 8.5°), while a significant difference was found between chopstick (-13.7 ± 12.5°) and spoon use (-5.6 ± 5.3°, p = 0.005), indicating task-specific hand control demands. Neck flexion also varied significantly between hair washing conditions (back > top, p < 0.001). Furthermore, when eating with a bowl rather than with a plate, participants showed significantly greater shoulder elevation, elbow flexion, and forearm rotation (p < 0.01), suggesting increased ROM demands shaped by Japanese eating customs.Discussion: These reference ROMs offer objective targets for seated-ADL rehabilitation and assistive-device design. Validation in older adults and clinical populations is warranted to confirm applicability and guide goal setting.

Keywords: kinematics, Activities of Daily Living, Eating, Drinking, Washing, Functional limitation, Rehabilitation

Received: 16 Jun 2025; Accepted: 12 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Inagaki, Ishida, Sugimori, Yoshimura, Watanabe, Naito and Sawamura. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yuji Inagaki, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Daisuke Sawamura, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.