Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Biomechanics and Control of Human Movement

This article is part of the Research TopicEmerging Trends in Computational Biomechanics for Sporting ExcellenceView all articles

Energy flow differences at the joints of the throwing arm between javelin and weighted balls in male javelin throwers

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
  • 2Marquette University, Milwaukee, United States
  • 3Univerzitet u Beogradu, Belgrade, Serbia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

To enhance release velocity during competition, javelin throwers incorporate implements of varying mass into their training regimens. Previous research has demonstrated that, although velocity contributes quadratically to the computation of kinetic energy, heavier implements exhibit substantially greater kinetic energy at the moment of release, despite markedly lower release velocities. The primary objective of the present investigation was to analyze the energy transfer within the throwing arm in order to gain deeper insight into the biomechanical mechanisms underlying the use of implements with different masses. For this purpose, the three-dimensional coordinates of 16 reflective markers were recorded for six athletes during throws using six different implement masses. The motion was recorded using 12 infrared cameras. Based on this kinematic data, segmental energy transfer was estimated via inverse dynamics using a multi-body modeling approach. Subsequent comparisons were conducted using non-linear temporal registration and statistical non-parametric mapping. The results indicate that energy flow at the shoulder joint remains largely consistent across implements of varying mass. However, significant differences in energy transfer were observed at more distal joints. These findings suggest that the increased kinetic energy observed with heavier implements arises from an internal redistribution of energy within the throwing arm, rather than from a greater overall energy input. Consequently, improvements in release velocity associated with lighter or heavier implements are likely attributable to mechanisms other than modifications in energy flow dynamics.

Keywords: inverse dynamics, Track & field, modeling, optimization, training equipment

Received: 20 Jun 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Köhler, Kipp, Prvulović and Witt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hans-Peter Köhler, hans-peter.koehler@uni-leipzig.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.