REVIEW article
Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1654577
This article is part of the Research TopicAssessment and Monitoring of Human Movement Volume IIView all 4 articles
The role and application of internal and external load indicators in monitoring fatigue in rugby players-a narrative review
Provisionally accepted- Graduate School of Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Although the scientific understanding of training load and fatigue monitoring in rugby has advanced considerably, critical challenges remain in the systematic implementation and integrative interpretation of internal and external load metrics. Through a comprehensive narrative review of PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI databases encompassing literature through December 2024, we critically examined the application and limitations of multiple monitoring approaches including GPS and inertial microsensor technologies, time-motion analysis, neuromuscular function assessments, subjective rating scales, cardiac autonomic markers, and biochemical profiling. Our synthesis reveals substantial methodological heterogeneity and lack of consensus regarding optimal implementation strategies for these metrics in rugby-specific contexts. Moving forward, research efforts should prioritize three key areas: (1) developing sport-specific algorithms for multi-modal data integration that account for rugby's unique physical demands; (2) establishing individualized monitoring protocols that consider positional requirements and athlete characteristics; and (3) validating predictive models that enhance the precision of load quantification while supporting evidence-based training prescription and injury risk mitigation in competitive rugby environments. These advancements would address current limitations in monitoring practice and provide practitioners with more reliable tools for optimizing athlete preparation and performance outcomes.
Keywords: Load management1, overtraining2, Recovery3, Performance4, Team sport5
Received: 26 Jun 2025; Accepted: 02 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lv. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xuehaiyue Lv, Graduate School of Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.