MINI REVIEW article
Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1668224
This article is part of the Research TopicBrain Function Alterations in Populations with Musculoskeletal Disorders: Now let’s talk about itView all articles
Targeting Visual-Sensory and Cognitive Impairments Following Lateral Ankle Sprains: A Practical Framework for Functional Assessment Across the Return-to-Sport Continuum Part 1. Sensory Reweighting and Cognitive Impairments: What are we really talking About and Why Clinicians Should Consider Central Alterations in Return to Sport Criteria
Provisionally accepted- 1Inter-University Laboratory of Human Movement Biology (LIBM), Savoie Mont-Blanc University, Chambéry, France
- 2French Society of Sports Physical Therapy (SFMKS Lab), Pierrefitte sur seine, France
- 3Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy,Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- 4Hopital de la Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland
- 5Universitat Paderborn Department Sport & Gesundheit, Paderborn, Germany
- 6Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 7Universiteit Hasselt Biomedisch Onderzoeksinstituut Rehabilitation Research Center, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- 8Centre Orthopedique Santy, Lyon, France
- 9Clinique du sport, Paris, France
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is the most common traumatic injury, with a high recurrence rate and chronic ankle instability (CAI) developing in ~40% of cases. LAS leads to patho-mechanical, sensory-perceptual and motor-behavioral deficits. Poor management of the return-to-sport (RTS) is now considered a major cause of re-injury and development of CAI, particularly due to the lack of validated tests and the failure of existing ones to account for those central deficits. The first part of this topic aimed to clarify concepts of cognitive constructs and sensory reweighting and their association with CAI. We also aimed to identify objective RTS criteria and discuss their limits regarding their ability to encompass central impairments. Motor-cognitive deficits have been identified using computerized cognitive tasks and dual-task paradigms. More specifically, deficits in visual memory, processing speed or inhibitory control and attentional resource allocation have demonstrated reduced performance in CAI populations. In addition, altered sensory reweighting process towards visual input has also been observed. While objective criteria are crucial to prevent re-injury, current evaluations remain largely subjective and central impairments are unaccounted for in conventional RTS testing. The Ankle-GOTM score was recently developed to guide clinicians in decision making process. To date, it is the first validated score that could help to identify patients who will RTS at the same level, those at risk of recurrence and those who are more likely to become copers. Unfortunately, it does not target cognitive or sensory reweighting alterations, that are both relevant in sport to manage gameplay demands.
Keywords: lateral ankle sprains, Chronic instability, Cognition, Sensory reweighting, Return to sport
Received: 17 Jul 2025; Accepted: 01 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Picot, Maricot, Fourchet, Gokeler, Tassignon, Lopes and Hardy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Brice Picot, brice.picot@univ-smb.fr
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.