BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Anti-doping Sciences & Integrity in Sport
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1683718
The effect of doping, anti-doping measures, and sociological factors on the annual distribution of all-time top performances in short, middle, and long-distance running
Provisionally accepted- 1Zavod za hematologiju, Klinicka bolnica Merkur, Zagreb, Croatia
- 2Sveuciliste u Zagrebu Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb, Croatia
- 3Sveuciliste Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku Medicinski Fakultet Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
- 4Zavod za endokrinologiju, dijabetes, bolesti metabolizma i kliničku farmakologiju, Klinicka bolnica Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
- 5Zavod za hematologiju, Klinicka bolnica Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Scientific advancements, doping, anti-doping strategies, and sociological factors all influence athletic performance. This retrospective study aimed to analyze how different variables affect the annual distribution of all-time top performances from 1968 to 2023 in men’s and women’s running disciplines with different physiological demands (100m–anaerobic, 5000m–aerobic, 800m–mixed aerobic-anaerobic). A public database, www.alltime-athletics.com, with results linked to doping already excluded, was used. The annual distribution of top performances was modeled using negative binomial distribution to assess the influence of continuous and categorical variables, including doping availability (e.g., tetrahydrogestrinone, erythropoietin), anti-doping measures (e.g., Athlete Biological Passport modules, out-of-competition testing), and sociological factors (e.g., Olympic years). Steroid related variables showed significant effects on the annual distribution of top performances across almost all tested men’s and women’s disciplines, with a significant negative influence of testosterone limitations in women’s 800m, as well as a negative influence of the steroid module of the Athlete Biological Passport in women’s 100m and men’s 800m and 5000m disciplines. Blood-doping related variables, including the positive influence of erythropoietin availability and the negative influence of the hematological module of the Athlete Biological Passport, demonstrated significant effects on performance in both 800m disciplines. Olympic years emerged as a positive factor in the majority of tested disciplines, while the COVID-19 pandemic showed no significant influence. Despite strict anti-doping measures, our findings reveal a complex interaction of doping practices, regulatory frameworks, and social factors that continue to influence trends in elite athletic performance.
Keywords: androgen anabolic steroids, Athlete biological passport, blood doping, Erythropoietin, Running, Testosterone, Tetrahydrogestrinone, top performance
Received: 11 Aug 2025; Accepted: 21 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Dragcevic, Jaksic, Libric, Jaksic, Radic-Kristo, Pandzic and Jaksic. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Dora Dragcevic, dora.dragcevic@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.