Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Sports Science, Technology and Engineering

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1688017

Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of the Digital Motor Performance Test (DigiMot)

Provisionally accepted
  • Padagogische Hochschule Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Assessing and monitoring physical fitness in children and adolescents requires valid, reliable, and feasible tests. The digital motor performance test (DigiMot) was developed for remote assessment via videoconference. This study evaluated its validity, reliability, and feasibility in children and adolescents. Methods: A total of 1,751 participants aged 5–17 years took part in this study. They completed four fitness tasks assessing coordination (Jumping Sideways), muscular endurance (Push-ups and Sit-ups), and flexibility (Stand-and-Reach). Validity was assessed by comparing remote and face-to-face performances (N = 60). Test–retest reliability was evaluated across two remote sessions (N = 96), and interrater reliability was analyzed using video-recorded sessions (N = 381). Feasibility was examined based on all available remote assessments (N = 1,751). Results: Concurrent validity was good for Jumping Sideways (ICC = .844), Push-ups (ICC = .718), and Sit-ups (ICC = .831), with almost perfect agreement for Stand-and-Reach (κ = .850). Test–retest reliability ranged from good (Push-ups, ICC = .781) to excellent (Sit-ups, ICC = .940; Jumping Sideways, ICC = .913), with almost perfect agreement for Stand-and-Reach (κ = .845). Interrater reliability was excellent for Jumping Sideways (ICC = .972) and Push-ups (ICC = .967), good for Sit-ups (ICC = .873), and substantial to almost perfect for Stand-and-Reach (κ = .805). Completion rates exceeded 98%, with minimal technical issues. Discussion: The DigiMot test demonstrates good to excellent validity, reliability, and feasibility, while addressing a relevant gap in remote physical fitness testing for children and adolescents.

Keywords: physical fitness1, videoconference2, youth3, monitoring4, Diagnosis5

Received: 18 Aug 2025; Accepted: 10 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Klein, Pauli, Greiner and Hanssen-Doose. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Thorsten Klein, thorsten.klein@ph-karlsruhe.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.