Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Elite Sports and Performance Enhancement

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1713852

This article is part of the Research TopicFootball training and competitionView all 22 articles

AI in Bundesliga Match Analysis – Expected Possession Value (EPV) vs. Expected Goals (xG) to Predict Match Outcomes in Soccer

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 2TSG 1899 Hoffenheim, Zuzenhausen, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

With an increasing number of key performance indicators (KPIs) in soccer analytics, it is key to identify the most valuable KPIs. One approach to define a KPI's value is to assess its ability to predict match outcomes and future performance. Therefore, this study aims to compare the effectiveness of expected goals (xG) and expected possession value (EPV) in predicting match outcomes in both pre-match and post-match scenarios. Event and tracking data of two Bundesliga seasons (2022/23 & 2023/24) were used to develop four distinct match outcome prediction approaches: xG & EPV pre-match (using features including the last three match performances of teams & contextual factors) and xG & EPV post-match (using xG and EPV performances of the played match). The xG post-match prediction showed the best performance in predicting match outcomes (xG post-match: RPS=0.148, Accuracy=0.656; EPV post-match: RPS=0.191, Accuracy=0.596). In pre-match scenarios EPV showed higher prediction performance (RPS=0.194, Accuracy=0.583) compared to xG (RPS=0.199, Accuracy=0.556). Accordingly, xG holds more valuable performance information on the offensive performance of a team in post-match scenarios. In contrast, the EPV pre-match prediction showed powerful results in predicting future match outcomes and thereby showcased the predictiveness of EPV.

Keywords: Football, team sports, match prediction, performance analysis, Tracking data, machine learning

Received: 26 Sep 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Forcher, Forcher, Woll and Altmann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Leander Forcher, leander.forcher@kit.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.