Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation

This article is part of the Research TopicInsights into biomechanics, injury prevention, and AI to promote racket sportsView all articles

Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Fixation Strategies for Sports-Related Tibial Tuberosity Avulsion Fractures in Adolescents: Biomechanical Evidence for Optimized Clinical Decision-Making

Provisionally accepted
Xiaoming  WangXiaoming Wang*Hengheng  ZhangHengheng ZhangZhe  TuoZhe TuoSiwen  LiuSiwen LiuHailiang  MengHailiang MengXing  TongXing TongMing  YangMing YangBing  WangBing Wang*
  • General Division, Pediatric Orthopedic Hospital, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This finite element study aimed to biomechanically compare screw fixation versus K-wire fixation for adolescent tibial tubercle avulsion fractures (TTAF), investigating the differential biomechanical outcomes and physeal insult associated with each fixation method. Methods: A finite element model of an adolescent tibia with a Modified Ogden type III fracture was developed. Three fixation types—(A) screws, (B) two non-crossing K-wires, and (C) four crossing K-wires—were tested both as standalone constructs and in their tension band-augmented counterparts. Simulations applied a 1654 N tensile load to simulate patellar tendon force, with outcomes assessed by fragment displacement, bone and epiphyseal von Mise stress. Results: Screw fixation (Type C3) demonstrated the highest stability, with fragment displacement of 1.97 mm and the lowest bone stress (295.79 MPa). K-wire constructs showed greater displacement and stress. The addition of a third fixator provided minimal stability improvement compared to two. Tension bands increased stability in K-wire models but raised bone stress to approximately 1100 MPa and increased physeal stress. Conclusion: Biomechanical analysis of TTAF reveals that screw fixation provides enhanced stability and reduced bone stress compared to K-wire fixation. Furthermore, the stability achieved with dual screws is comparable to that of triple screws, implying that adding more implants offers a limited advantage in fracture fixation stability. Considering the greatest physeal insult, particularly in skeletally immature individuals with retained growth potential, tension band wiring should be used sparingly. Based on these results, screw fixation is recommended as the optimal approach for adolescent TTAF.

Keywords: Tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture, Finite Element Analysis, screwfixation, Kirschner wire, Biomechanics, Adolescent

Received: 22 Oct 2025; Accepted: 14 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Zhang, Tuo, Liu, Meng, Tong, Yang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xiaoming Wang, albin5489@163.com
Bing Wang, wangbingheli@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.