Ageism, defined as stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination based on age, is a pervasive social phenomenon with profound implications for health across the lifespan. Conceptually, ageism comprises three interrelated components: cognitive (stereotypes and beliefs about aging), affective (emotional reactions toward older adults), and behavioural (actions or discriminatory practices). Recent studies have demonstrated strong associations between ageism and emotional distress. Internalized age stereotypes, in particular, have been linked to increased morbidity, cognitive decline, and reduced longevity. Encouragingly, research indicates that ageism is modifiable through targeted interventions. Educational programs promoting intergenerational contact, empathy-enhancing strategies, and cognitive-behavioural reframing have shown promise in reducing ageist attitudes. Systemic changes through policy reforms and public health campaigns have also proven effective in reshaping societal perceptions.
This Research Topic aims to advance understanding of the mechanisms linking ageism with diverse health trajectories, and to identify evidence-based strategies for its mitigation. We especially welcome multidisciplinary contributions, including original research, systematic reviews, theoretical papers, methodological advances, and assessment innovations, that examine how ageism affects physical and mental health, and explore both individual and structural determinants across varied contexts and populations. Of particular interest are works integrating behavioural, psychosocial, and biological perspectives, including experimental interventions and longitudinal analyses.
Submissions may discuss, but are not limited to, the following themes: -The impact of internalized and institutionalized ageism on mental, physical, and cognitive health outcomes -Mechanisms linking ageist attitudes with stress physiology, health behaviors, and healthcare access -Development and validation of instruments to assess explicit and implicit forms of ageism -Interventions to reduce ageism, including educational, intergenerational, narrative-based, and cognitive-behavioral approaches -Cross-cultural, lifespan, and intersectional perspectives on the expression and consequences of ageism
By integrating insights from psychology, gerontology, neuroscience, and public health, this Research Topic aims to inform theory, practice, and policy toward measuring, understanding, and ultimately mitigating ageism to foster healthier and more inclusive societies.
Article types and fees
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Case Report
Clinical Trial
Community Case Study
Conceptual Analysis
Data Report
Editorial
FAIR² Data
FAIR² DATA Direct Submission
Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.
Article types
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Case Report
Clinical Trial
Community Case Study
Conceptual Analysis
Data Report
Editorial
FAIR² Data
FAIR² DATA Direct Submission
General Commentary
Hypothesis and Theory
Methods
Mini Review
Opinion
Original Research
Perspective
Policy and Practice Reviews
Policy Brief
Registered Report
Review
Study Protocol
Systematic Review
Keywords: ageism; aging and health; internalized stereotypes; mental health and well-being; intergenerational and educational interventions; measurement and assessment tools; psychosocial and biological mechanisms; policy and public health approaches
Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.