Abstract
The complex Ginzburg–Landau (CGL) equation which describes the soliton propagation in the presence of the detuning factor is firstly considered; then its solitons as well as Jacobi elliptic function solutions are obtained systematically using a modified Jacobi elliptic expansion method. In special cases, several dark and bright soliton solutions to the CGL equation are retrieved when the modulus of ellipticity approaches unity. The results presented in the current work can help to complete previous studies on the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation.
Introduction
One of the very hot topics in many of today's research is the search for exact solutions of non-linear partial differential (NLPD) equations. As it is known, exact solutions of NLPD equations play a significant role in a wide variety of applied sciences and provide meaningful information about physical phenomena modeled by non-linear partial differential equations. Fortunately, with the development of symbolic computation packages, a variety of systematic methods [1–34] (Hosseini et al., under review) have been proposed to obtain exact solutions of NLPD equations. Many of these methods are based on considering the solution as a finite series in terms of the solutions of well-known ordinary differential equations such as Bernoulli, Riccati, and Jacobi equations. Among these methods, the modified Jacobi elliptic expansion (MJEE) method [21–27] has achieved a great deal of attention. For instance, El-Sheikh et al. [25] extracted elliptic function solutions of non-linear Boussinesq-like equations using the MJEE method. Hosseini et al. [26] applied the MJEE method to find optical solitons of the Fokas–Lenells equation. Hosseini et al. [27] also obtained exact solutions of a (3+1)-dimensional resonant non-linear Schrödinger equation through the MJEE method. Such results encouraged the authors of the present article to employ the modified Jacobi elliptic expansion method to derive complex wave structures of the following complex Ginzburg–Landau equation [28–34] (Hosseini et al., under review)
which describes the soliton propagation in the presence of the detuning factor. In the CGL Equation (1), α1 and α2 are the coefficients of the group velocity dispersion and the Kerr law non-linearity while α3 and α4 denote the coefficients of the perturbation effects, especially α4 comes from the detuning effect. Recently, the main subject of a lot of studies has been focused on the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation and its exact solutions. Osman et al. [30] reported several complex wave structures to the CGL equation using a modified auxiliary equation method. In another paper, Abdou et al. [31] obtained dark-singular combo solitons of the CGL equation through the extended Jacobi elliptic expansion method. Solitons of the CGL equation were derived by Arshed in [32] with the help of the exp(−φ(ϵ))-expansion method. Rezazadeh [33] listed a series of soliton solutions to the CGL equation using a new extended direct algebraic method, and finally, Arnous et al. [34] employed the modified simple equation method to generate optical solitons of the CGL equation. This paper is arranged as follows: In Section the modified Jacobi elliptic expansion method and its fundamental, the modified Jacobi elliptic expansion method and its fundamental is reviewed. In Section complex Ginzburg–Landau equation and its exact solutions, exact solutions of the CGL equation are given by applying the MJEE method. Section conclusion is devoted to summarizing the conclusions.
The Modified Jacobi Elliptic Expansion Method and Its Fundamental
To explain the basic ideas of the modified Jacobi elliptic expansion method, we consider the following NLPD equation
and suppose that it can be converted to an ODE as follows
through considering the transformation u(x, t) = U(ξ)ei(−κx+ωt+θ) which ξ = x − νt.
Now, assume that the non-trivial solution of Equation (3) can be expressed as
where c0, ci, and di (1 ≤ i ≤ N) are constants to be found later, N is the balance number, and J(ξ) is a known function satisfying the following Jacobi elliptic equation
The Jacobi elliptic Equation (5) admits the following exact solutions (See Table 1):
Table 1
| No. | D | E | F | J(ξ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | −(m2+1) | m2 | sn(ξ) |
| 2 | 1−m2 | 2m2−1 | −m2 | cn(ξ) |
| 3 | m2 | −(m2+1) | 1 | ns(ξ) |
| 4 | −m2 | 2m2−1 | 1−m2 | nc(ξ) |
Jacobi elliptic function solutions of Equation (5).
By substituting the solution (4) along with the Jacobi elliptic Equation (5) into Equation (3) and performing a series of calculations, we arrive at a set of non-linear algebraic equations whose solution yields exact solutions of the NLPD Equation (2).
The Jacobi elliptic functions include some interesting properties that are reviewed below [35]:
sn2(ξ) + cn2(ξ) = 1.
sn(ξ) = sn(ξ, m) → tanh(ξ) when m → 1.
ns(ξ) = (sn(ξ, m))−1 → coth(ξ) when m → 1.
Complex Ginzburg–Landau Equation and its Exact Solutions
To gain exact solutions of the CGL equation, we first apply a complex transformation in the form below
where ν is the velocity of the soliton whereas κ, ω, and θ are the wave number, the frequency, and the phase constant, respectively. Such a complex transformation results in
where the velocity of the soliton is
Now, based on the Jacobi elliptic expansion method and the balance number N = 1, the solution of Equation (6) is considered as follows
where c0, c1, and c2 are constants to be found later. By inserting the above solution along with the Jacobi elliptic Equation (5) into Equation (6) and performing a series of calculations, we will get a set of non-linear algebraic equations as
Solving the above set of non-linear algebraic equations leads to the following cases:
Case 1. When D = 1, E = −(m2 + 1), and F = m2, we obtain
Now, the following exact solutions to the CGL equation are retrieved
The 3-dimensional graphs of |u1(x, t)| and |u3(x, t)| which indicate dark and bright soliton solutions have been shown in Figure 1 for a series of the involved parameters.
Figure 1
Case 2. When D = 1 − m2, E = 2m2 − 1, and F = −m2, we acquire
Now, the following Jacobi elliptic function solutions to the CGL equation are derived.
Case 3. When D = m2, E = −(m2 + 1), and F = 1, we obtain
Now, the following exact solutions to the CGL equation are retrieved
The 3-dimensional graphs of |u11(x, t)| and |u13(x, t)| which denote dark and bright soliton solutions have been presented in Figure 2 for a series of the involved parameters.
Figure 2
Case 4. When D = −m2, E = 2m2 − 1, and F = 1 − m2, we acquire
Now, the following Jacobi elliptic function solutions to the CGL equation are derived.
Conclusion
The complex Ginzburg–Landau equation as a famous NLPD equation was studied successfully in the current paper. A modified version of the Jacobi elliptic expansion method was formally adopted to carry out this goal. A wide variety of exact solutions to the CGL equation in the presence of the detuning factor were derived. Particularly, several dark and bright soliton solutions were derived when the modulus of ellipticity approaches unity. Although, the exact solutions given in the present paper provide useful information about the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation, seeking other exact solutions of the CGL equation can be considered as an important task in our future works.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
KH and DB: conceptualization, project administration, and Supervision. KH: data curation and visualization. KH and MM: formal analysis, investigation, and writing—original draft. MA and DB: funding acquisition. KH, MM, MO, and MA: methodology, software, and validation. KH, MM, MO, MA, and DB: resources. KH, MM, and MO: writing—review editing. All persons who meet authorship criteria are listed as authors, and all authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, writing, or revision of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
BiswasAEkiciMTrikiHSonmezogluAMirzazadehMZhouQet al. Resonant optical soliton perturbation with anti-cubic non-linearity by extended trial function method. Optik. (2018) 156:784–90. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.12.035
2.
BiswasAEkiciMSonmezogluAAlqahtaniRT. Sub-pico-second chirped optical solitons in mono-mode fibers with Kaup–Newell equation by extended trial function method. Optik. (2018) 168:208–16. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.04.069
3.
LuDSeadawyAArshadM. Applications of extended simple equation method on unstable non-linear Schrödinger equations. Optik. (2017) 140:136–44. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.04.032
4.
ArnousAHUllahMZMoshokoaSPZhouQTrikiHMirzazadehMet al. Optical solitons in birefringent fibers with modified simple equation method. Optik. (2017) 130:996–1003. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.11.101
5.
KudryashovNA. One method for finding exact solutions of non-linear differential equations. Commun Non-Linear Sci Numerical Simulations. (2012) 17:2248–53. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.10.016
6.
HosseiniKKorkmazABekirASamadaniFZabihiATopsakalM. New wave form solutions of non-linear conformable time-fractional Zoomeron equation in (2+1)-dimensions. Waves Random Complex Media. (2019) (in press). 10.1080/17455030.2019.1579393
7.
HosseiniKYazdani BejarbanehEBekirAKaplanM. New exact solutions of some non-linear evolution equations of pseudoparabolic type. Optical Quantum Electr. (2017) 49:241. 10.1007/s11082-017-1070-z
8.
HosseiniKMayeliPKumarD. New exact solutions of the coupled sine-Gordon equations in non-linear optics using the modified Kudryashov method. J Modern Opt. (2018) 65:361–4. 10.1080/09500340.2017.1380857
9.
YanC. A simple transformation for non-linear waves. Phys Lett A. (1996) 224:77–84. 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00770-0
10.
KumarDHosseiniKSamadaniF. The sine-Gordon expansion method to look for the traveling wave solutions of the Tzitzéica type equations in non-linear optics. Optik. (2017) 149:439–46. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.09.066
11.
AliKKWazwazAMOsmanMS. Optical soliton solutions to the generalized non-autonomous non-linear Schrödinger equations in optical fibers via the sine-Gordon expansion method. Optik. (2019) 204:164132. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.164132
12.
AliKKOsmanMSAbdel-AtyM. New optical solitary wave solutions of Fokas–Lenells equation in optical fiber via Sine-Gordon expansion method. Alexandria Eng J. (2020) 59:1191–96. 10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.037
13.
HosseiniKMirzazadehMIlieMRadmehrS. Dynamics of optical solitons in the perturbed Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation. Optik. (2020) 206:164350. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164350
14.
HosseiniKOsmanMSMirzazadehMRabieiF. Investigation of different wave structures to the generalized third-order non-linear Scrödinger equation. Optik. (2020) 206:164259. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164259
15.
HosseiniKMirzazadehMZhouQLiuYMoradiM. Analytic study on chirped optical solitons in non-linear metamaterials with higher order effects. Laser Phys. (2019) 29:095402. 10.1088/1555-6611/ab356f
16.
LiuJGOsmanMSZhuWHZhouLAiGP. Different complex wave structures described by the Hirota equation with variable coefficients in inhomogeneous optical fibers. Appl Phys B. (2019) 125:175. 10.1007/s00340-019-7287-8
17.
GhanbariBOsmanMSBaleanuD. Generalized exponential rational function method for extended Zakharov–Kuzetsov equation with conformable derivative. Modern Phys Lett A. (2019) 34:1950155. 10.1142/S0217732319501554
18.
LuDTariqKUOsmanMSBaleanuDYounisMKhaterMMA. New analytical wave structures for the (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili and the generalized Boussinesq models and their applications. Results Phys. (2019) 14:102491. 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102491
19.
ShangY. Lie algebraic discussion for affinity based information diffusion in social networks, Acta Physica Polonica B. (2015) 46:1567–77. 10.5506/APhysPolB.46.1567
20.
ShangY. Analytical solution for an in-host viral infection model with time-inhomogeneous rates. Open Phys. (2017) 15:705–11. 10.1515/phys-2017-0083
21.
MaHCZhangZPDengAP. A new periodic solution to Jacobi elliptic functions of MKdV equation and BBM equation. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica. (2012) 28:409–15. 10.1007/s10255-012-0153-7
22.
ZayedEMEShohibRMABiswasAYildirimYMallawiFBelicMR. Chirped and chirp-free solitons in optical fiber Bragg gratings with dispersive reflectivity having parabolic law non-linearity by Jacobi's elliptic function. Results Phys. (2019) 15:102784. 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102784
23.
ZayedEMEAlngarMEM. Optical solitons in birefringent fibers with Biswas–Arshed model by generalized Jacobi elliptic function expansion method. Optik. (2020) 203:163922. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163922
24.
HosseiniKMirzazadehMIlieMGómez-AguilarJF. Biswas–Arshed equation with the beta time derivative: optical solitons and other solutions. Optik. (2020) 217:164801. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164801
25.
El-SheikhMMASeadawyARAhmedHMArnousAHRabieWB. Dispersive and propagation of shallow water waves as a higher order non-linear Boussinesq-like dynamical wave equations. Physica A. (2020) 537:122662. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122662
26.
HosseiniKMirzazadehMVahidiJAsghariR. Optical wave structures to the Fokas–Lenells equation. Optik. (2020) 207:164450. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164450
27.
HosseiniKMatinfarMMirzazadehM. A (3+1)-dimensional resonant non-linear Schrödinger equation and its Jacobi elliptic and exponential function solutions. Optik. (2020) 207:164458. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164458
28.
MirzazadehMEkiciMSonmezogluAEslamiMZhouQ.KaraAHet al. Optical solitons with complex Ginzburg–Landau equation. Non-linear Dyn. (2016) 85:1979–2016. 10.1007/s11071-016-2810-5
29.
OsmanMSGhanbariBMachadoJAT. New complex waves in non-linear optics based on the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation with Kerr law non-linearity. Eur Phys J Plus. (2019) 134:20. 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12442-4
30.
OsmanMSLuDKhaterMMAAttiaRAM. Complex wave structures for abundant solutions related to the complex Ginzburg–Landau model. Optik. (2019) 192:162927. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.06.027
31.
AbdouMASolimanAABiswasAEkiciMZhouQMoshokoaSP. Dark-singular combo optical solitons with fractional complex Ginzburg–Landau equation. Optik. (2018) 171:463–7. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.06.076
32.
ArshedS. Soliton solutions of fractional complex Ginzburg–Landau equation with Kerr law and non-Kerr law media. Optik. (2018) 160:322–32. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.02.022
33.
RezazadehH. New solitons solutions of the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation with Kerr law non-linearity. Optik. (2018) 167:218–27. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.04.026
34.
ArnousAHSeadawyARAlqahtaniRTBiswasA. Optical solitons with complex Ginzburg–Landau equation by modified simple equation method. Optik. (2017) 144:475–80. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.07.013
35.
HancockH. Lectures on the Theory of Elliptic Functions. New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons (1910).
Summary
Keywords
complex Ginzburg–Landau equation, detuning factor, modified Jacobi elliptic expansion method, solitons, Jacobi elliptic function solutions
Citation
Hosseini K, Mirzazadeh M, Osman MS, Al Qurashi M and Baleanu D (2020) Solitons and Jacobi Elliptic Function Solutions to the Complex Ginzburg–Landau Equation. Front. Phys. 8:225. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00225
Received
23 April 2020
Accepted
25 May 2020
Published
30 June 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Grienggrai Rajchakit, Maejo University, Thailand
Reviewed by
Yilun Shang, Northumbria University, United Kingdom; Alexander I. Nesterov, Universidad de Guadalajara, Mexico
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Hosseini, Mirzazadeh, Osman, Al Qurashi and Baleanu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kamyar Hosseini kamyar_hosseini@yahoo.com
This article was submitted to Mathematical Physics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.