Abstract
Branched Au nanoparticles have attracted intense interest owing to their remarkable properties and a wide variety of potential applications in surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), photothermal therapy, photoacoustic imaging, and biomedicines. The morphology and spatial arrangement of branches play the most crucial role in the determination of their properties and applications. However, it is still a synthetic challenge to control the exact arm numbers of branches with specific spatial arrangements. Here we report a facile method for the kinetically controlled growth of Au nanooctopods (NOPs) with a high yield (81%), monodispersity, and reproducibility by using the synergistic reducing effect of ascorbic acid and 1-methylpyrrolidine. The NOPs have eight arms elongated along <111> directions with uniform arm lengths. Due to their well-defined size and shape, NOPs show ultra-narrow surface plasmon band width with a full width at half maximum of only 76 nm (0.20 eV). Upon irradiation with laser, the NOPs possessed excellent photothermal conversion efficiencies up to 83.0% and photoacoustic imaging properties. This work highlights the future prospects of using NOPs with desired physicochemical properties for biomedical applications.
Introduction
Research on Au nanoparticles has been boosted by diverse applications because of their unique size- and shape-dependent properties (Link and El-Sayed, 2000; Kelly et al., 2003; Li et al., 2014; Boles et al., 2016). The past decade has witnessed spectacular success in developing a myriad of methods for shape-controlled synthesis of anisotropic Au nanoparticles with well-defined structures, such as triangles (Malikova et al., 2002), prisms (Shankar et al., 2004), rods (Jana et al., 2001; Nikoobakht and El-Sayed, 2003), cubes (Sun and Xia, 2002; Kim et al., 2004; Zhang, J. et al., 2010), shells (Averitt et al., 1997), stars (Hao et al., 2004; Nehl et al., 2006; Kumar et al., 2007), bipyramids (Liu and Guyot-Sionnest, 2005), cages (Skrabalak et al., 2008), etc. Among them, Au nanobranches with a center core and several protruding arms with sharp tips have drawn enormous attention due to their excellent localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) properties (Chen et al., 2003; Guerrero-Martínez et al., 2011; Lim and Xia, 2011; Ye et al., 2015). The arm-length dependent LSPR band in the biological window (650–1,350 nm), remarkable enhanced local E-field at their sharp tips, and relative high cellular uptake and low cytotoxicity make Au nanobranches very attractive for bio-applications, such as SERS-based sensing (Khoury and Vo-Dinh, 2008; Indrasekara et al., 2014), photoacoustic imaging (Wei et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2014), photothermal therapy (Yuan et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2013), and nanomedicines (Dam et al., 2012), etc.
Many of these applications rely on single wavelength laser to excite the plasmon resonance. To maximize the radiation efficiency and minimize the toxicity and negative side effect in bio-applications, Au nanobranches with narrow plasmon band matching with the laser wavelength is strongly desired. In addition, a narrower plasmon peak width implies a smaller plasmon damping and a larger local electric field enhancement of the nanoparticles (Sönnichsen et al., 2002). Narrow plasmon linewidth of nanoparticles is vital in many plasmonic applications (Zhu et al., 2016), such as monitoring their electron transfer to other materials (Hoggard et al., 2013), studying chemical bonding on their surface (Zijlstra et al., 2012), and developing ultrasensitive chemical and biological LSPR sensors (Mayer and Hafner, 2011). Generally, the extinction spectra of nanobranches, however, exhibit very broad UV-Vis-NIR peaks (inhomogeneous broadening effects) due to unavoidable shape differences of individual Au nanobranches, that is, the number, size, and orientation of their arms vary greatly among them. Although Au nanooctopods can be synthesized with the cubic Au seeds from previous literature protocols, the arms of the octopods were too short to exhibit highly branched architectures and sharp tips. In addition, the Au nanooctopods showed broad band due to their size and structural inhomogeneity (Smith et al., 2016). Therefore, the lack of reliable synthetic methods for highly branched Au nanoparticles with accurate control of the number of arms, spatial arrangement of arms, arm size, high yield as well as reproducibility hinders the fundamental understanding of their properties and the assessment of their potentials (Niu et al., 2015).
Herein, we report a facile kinetically controlled growth of monodisperse NOPs with a high yield and narrow LSPR band by using 1-methylpyrrolidine (1-MP) and ascorbic acid (AA) as effective co-reducing agents for HAuCl4 at room temperature. With the presence of single-crystalline Au seeds, the high reduction rate of Au precursor leads to the growth of eight arms along <111> directions of the seeds. The NOPs show strong and ultra-narrow LSPR peak in the range of 660–720 nm. They exhibit remarkable photothermal conversion efficiencies up to 83.0% and a photoacoustic response upon 680 nm laser irradiation. These NOPs hold great promise of highly efficient photothermal conversion and photoacoustic dual-functional agents.
Materials and methods
Materials
Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), 1-methylpyrrolidine (1-MP), gold (III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O), ascorbic acid (AA), and sodium borohydride (NaBH4) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Monomethoxy-poly (ethylene glycol)-thiol (mPEG-SH, molecular weight = 5,000 g/mol) was purchased from JenKem Technology. All the reagents were used as received without further purification. Deionized water (18.2 MΩ·cm) was used for all solution preparations.
Synthesis of Au seeds
The gold seed nanoparticles were prepared according to the method reported previously with a slight modification (Nikoobakht and El-Sayed, 2003). CTAB solution (3.5 mL, 0.14 M) was mixed with of HAuCl4 (0.125 mL, 15 mM). A freshly prepared, ice-cold NaBH4 solution (0.50 mL, 0.010 M) was injected to the mixture, resulting in the formation of a brownish yellow solution. The seed solution was vigorously stirred for 120 s and then kept at 25°C.
Synthesis of Au NOPs
The aqueous solutions of HAuCl4 (15 mM, 0.38 mL), CTAB (0.40 M, 2.375 mL), and 1-MP (1.0 M, 0.90 mL) were added in a glass vial, named solution A. Deionized water (6.12 mL), AA (0.10 M, 225 μL), and seeds solution (1.8 μL) were added in another glass vial, named solution B. Solution B was quickly added to solution A, and the reaction mixture was incubated at 25°C for 5 min.
PEGylation of Au NOPs
The as-synthesized NOPs (1.0 mL) were purified by centrifugation at 9,000 rpm for 15 min. The precipitation was redispersed by 1.0 mL aqueous solution of mPEG-SH (0.10 mg/mL). The mixture was ultra-sonicated for 5 min and stirred over night at room temperature.
Materials characterization
The size, morphology, and structure of NOPs were studied by using JEOL JEM-2100F and Hitachi H800 transmission electron microscope (TEM) with an accelerating voltage of 200 and 175 kV, respectively. The UV-Vis-NIR extinction spectra were recorded using a Lambda 950 (PerkinElmer) Spectrometer. The purification of NOPs was performed by using Eppendorf Centrifuge 5430R at 25°C. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of NOPs solutions drop-coated onto glass substrates were done on Empyrean (PANalytical B. V.) operating at a voltage of 40 kV.
Simulation of the capping effect of 1-MP
Density Functional Theory calculations were performed by means of the Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package (VASP) (Hafner, 2008) using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) generalized-gradient approximation (Perdew et al., 1996). The interactions between valence electrons and ion cores were treated by Blöchl's all-electron-like projector augmented wave (PAW) method (Blöchl, 1994). The plane-wave cutoff for the wave functions was 400 eV throughout. For all calculations, we used a (4 × 4) supercell consisting of a four-layer slab with vacuum thickness of about 20 Å and molecules adsorbed on one side of the slab. The adsorbed molecule and the top three layers of Au were allowed to relax. The Brillouin zone integration was performed using a cell size dependent Monkhorst–Pack k point sampling (Monkhorst and Pack, 1976) and the k-point mesh was 3 × 3 × 1 for surface reconstruction and 7 × 7 × 1 for single-molecule adsorption. Ionic relaxation for all stable structures was carried out until all forces were smaller than 0.02 eV/Å. The adsorption energy for molecules on Au was calculated as follows: where Emolecule/Au is the total energy of the Au surface together with the adsorbed molecule, Emolecule is the total energy of the free molecule, and EAu is the total energy of the bare Au surface. With this method, the negative values of adsorption energy suggest that the adsorption configuration is more stable than the corresponding bare Au surface and the free molecule.
Laser-induced heat conversion of Au NOPs
A diode laser at 660 nm (LEO photonics Co. Ltd.) was employed in the experiments. PEG-modified NOPs (1.0 mL) in a quartz cuvette (1-cm path length) was irradiated by the laser with tunable power densities (0.50–2.0 W/cm2). PEG-modified NOPs with different optical densities (ODs) (0.10–1.0) were irradiated by the laser at 1.0 W/cm2. Deionized water was used as a negative control. The laser spot was adjusted to cover the entire surface of the sample. Real-time thermal imaging and the maximum temperature was recorded by a FLIR A310 infrared camera.
In vitro photoacoustic imaging of Au NOPs
PEG-modified NOPs solutions with different optical densities were introduced into agar-gel cylinders and put in deionized water at a consistent depth. Photoacoustic images were obtained at 680 nm wavelength by MSOT inVision 128 small animal scanner.
Results and discussion
The NOPs were prepared by the regrowth from well-defined single-crystalline Au seeds (see section Materials and Methods for details). In a typical synthesis, a seed solution of Au seeds and ascorbic acid (AA) were quickly added into a fresh-prepared growth solution containing HAuCl4 and 1-methylpyrrolidine (1-MP) in the presence of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) at room temperature and final pH of 11.3. Both AA and 1-MP (Newman and Blanchard, 2006) were reducing agents for HAuCl4, and the basic pH increased the reduction rates (vide infra). CTAB was used as a surface capping agent to provide the colloidal stability for the synthesized nanoparticles. After the mixing, the color of the solution immediately turned from colorless to peacock blue in about 5 min, indicating the formation of NOPs. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) study (Figure 1A) of NOPs reveals the NOPs with a high yield (81%) of possessed eight arms with a uniform arm length and width of 19.5 ± 1.4 and 9.4 ± 1.0 nm, respectively. The NOPs also showed an extraordinary LSPR peak at 680 nm with a FWHM (Full width at half maximum) as narrow as 76 nm (0.20 eV) (Mets et al., 2012), which demonstrates high monodispersity of the NOPs (Figure 1B).
Figure 1
Figure 2A shows a high-resolution TEM image of an individual NOP, where periodic lattice fringes can be clearly resolved. The distance between adjacent lattice fringes was about 0.240 nm, corresponding to the d-spacing of Au {111} planes. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern recorded on a glass substrate was displayed in Figure 2B. The diffraction peaks were assigned to (111), (200), (220), (311), (222) planes of face-centered cubic Au, respectively (JCPDS No. 04-0784). It is worth noting that although the ratio between the intensities of the (200) to (111) diffraction peaks was similar to the conventional values (0.50 vs. 0.52), the ratios of (220)/(111) and (220)/(200) were significantly lower than the conventional values (0.21 vs. 0.32) and (0.42 vs. 0.62), respectively. This result indicates that the NOPs were abundant in (111) and (200) facets. Close inspection and analysis of the image (Figure 2A) reveals that the arms grew from the eight corners of Au seeds along <111> directions to form octopod structure. To further understand the spatial arrangement of the arms, three dimensional (3D)-TEM images taken from various tilting angles were consistent with our model of NOPs at different views (Figures 2C,D).
Figure 2
The formation of anisotropic structure requires breaking the face-centered cubic symmetry of Au crystals. Therefore, the growth mechanism is important for understanding how the arms arise from Au seeds. In general, thermodynamically controlled nanocrystals with the global minimum in Gibbs free energy can be synthesized by capping agents which effectively reduce the surface free energy of the nanocrystals. To help elucidate this process, we first considered the effect of CTAB and 1-MP as capping agents. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations of the adsorption energy of 1-MP on different Au crystal facets indicate that 1-MP taking a flat conformation with the N atom preferentially adsorbed on the top-position of Au atoms (Figure S1). The sequence of 1-MP adsorption energies (ΔEads) on different crystallographic facets is in agreement with that of CTAB (Liu et al., 2011), i.e., |ΔEads (111)| < |ΔEads (100)| < |ΔEads (110)|. This result suggests that the NOPs covered by both 1-MP and CTAB would thermodynamically enclosed by higher proportion of {110} facets on the surface, which is conflicting with our analysis of XRD result (Figure 2B).
Our success in the synthesis of NOPs essentially relied on the kinetic control of growth process (Zhang, H. et al., 2010; Xia et al., 2013, 2015; Wang et al., 2015a). As proposed previously, for seed-mediated growth method, the ratio between the deposition rate (Vdep) and the diffusion rate (Vdiff) determines the growth pathway from a single-crystal seed and thereby the morphology of the produced nanocrystals. Vdep is the rate for the atoms added to the active nanocrystal facets with a higher surface free energy, and Vdiff is the rate for the adatoms migrating to the nanocrystal facets with a lower surface free energy. For a near rhombicuboctahedron-shaped single-crystal seed, due to the preferential binding of CTAB capping agent on the {100} and {110} facets, {111} corner facets are the most active sites as a result of less coverage by the capping agent (Park et al., 2013). For a slow reduction rate, Vdep ≪ Vdiff, most of the adatoms at the corners will migrate to edges and side facets, and the growth will prevail along the <100> and <110> directions, leading to the formation of Wulff shape (Xia et al., 2015), as favored by thermodynamics (Figure 3, Path A). On the contrary, for a fast reduction rate, Vdep ≫ Vdiff, surface diffusion can be ignored and the growth will be switched to the <111> directions, promoting the formation of a kinetically favored octopods as the product (Figure 3, Path B).
Figure 3
Both of Vdep and Vdiff are kinetic parameters and can be manipulated by varying the ratio between Au seeds and HAuCl4, and the rate of reduction of HAuCl4. We studied the reductive ability of AA and 1-MP in the absence of Au seeds by monitoring the peak at 395 nm which is attributed from the [CTA]+ [AuBr4]− complex (Kundu, 2013). It is well-known that AA can reduce HAuCl4 to Au+ under neutral or acidic condition, but to Au0 under strong alkaline condition (Goia and Matijević, 1999). In the present study when only AA was added into the solution A containing [CTA]+ [AuBr4]− complex at the pH of 11.4, Au nanoparticles with a LSPR peak around 530 nm were formed in 1 min. At the meantime, the peak at 395 nm was remained (Figure S2A), indicating that under strong alkaline condition, AA could not quickly reduce Au3+ to Au+ as it does under neutral or acid condition. The [CTA]+ [AuBr4]− complex was completely consumed after 3 h, accompanying by the formation of more Au nanoparticles with quasi-spheres (Figure S3A). This result suggests under strong alkaline condition, although AA can reduce Au3+ to form Au nanoparticles, the reduction rate of Au3+ to Au0 is slow.
On the other side, when only 1-MP was used as reducing agent under the same condition, the peak of [CTA]+ [AuBr4]− complex was completely vanished in 1 min, while no Au nanoparticles were formed as indicated from the UV-Vis-NIR spectra (Figure S2B). The formation of Au nanoparticles was much slower compared to that of AA. This result reveals that 1-MP is a reducing agent which can reduce Au3+ to Au+ with a much higher rate compared to AA under basic conditions, but its ability to further reduce Au+ to Au0 is weaker than that of AA under strong alkaline condition. From the above results we can conclude that if only AA or 1-MP is used as the solo reducing agent, the reduction rate of formation of Au0 is not high enough to achieve Vdep ≫ Vdiff, and only spherical or irregular shaped nanoparticles were obtained, respectively (Figure S3). In contrast, when both AA and 1-MP were used, 1-MP can quickly reduce Au3+ to Au+, which can be further reduced to Au0 by AA to reach a high Vdep. Therefore, we conclude that under the strong alkaline condition, AA and 1-MP have a synergistic reducing effect for achieving the condition of Vdep≫Vdiff, leading to the formation of NOPs with branches along <111> directions. This result is consistent with the theoretical prediction for the scenario of Vdep ≫ Vdiff mentioned previously (Xia et al., 2015).
We also performed control experiments to investigate the effect of seed/precursor ratio on the morphology of NOPs. By increasing the volume of Au seeds solution from 1.0 to 3.0 μL with other conditions unchanged, both of the average aspect ratios and lengths of the arms of NOPs can be continuously adjusted from 2.00 to 1.25 and 22.8 to 15.8 nm, respectively (Figure 4, Table S1), that is, the more Au seeds the smaller arms. Further increasing the amount of Au seeds to 12 μL led to only thermodynamically stable product, i.e., quasi-spheres (Figure 4E). This result reveals that when the number of Au atoms available for every seed is smaller, the ratio of Vdep/Vdiff was reduced, leading to thermodynamic products. In addition, this result also demonstrates that one can control the aspect ratio and arm length, as well as LSPR position, by tuning the seed/HAuCl4 ratio. It is worth mentioning that the arm length and aspect ratio of NOPs depend on their LSPR position, and the LSPR wavelength was linearly correlated with the aspect ratio of NOPs (R2 = 0.969) (Figure S4).
Figure 4
Additionally, the reaction temperature also plays a paramount role in determining whether thermodynamic or kinetic control is dominant. High temperatures normally lead to generate thermodynamically controlled nanocrystals. After incubated at higher temperature (60°C) for 4 h, the morphology of as-synthesized NOPs was quickly transformed to Wulff shape with lower surface free energy (Figure S5), which is corresponding to the path C in Figure 3. This result confirms the NOPs are kinetically controlled product, of which the shape changes to thermodynamically stable at high temperatures.
It's worth pointing out that the NOPs are thermodynamically unstable due to a relatively high surface energy at the sharp tips, resulting in changes of their morphology to less anisotropic structures and the blue-shifting of their LSPR bands (Figure S6; Wang et al., 2015b). Therefore, the practical applications of the NOPs are severely limited. In search of the appropriate methods for stabilizing the NOPs, we have tried halogen ions, surfactants (i.e., CTAB), and six thiol compounds, including cysteine, 3-mercaptopropionic acid, glutathione, 11-mercaptopropionic acid, polyetherimide, mPEG-SH. Among them, we found that mPEG-SH modified NOPs showed negligible shifting of their LSPR band in 5 days at room temperature (Figure S7) and good thermal-stability at high temperature (at 75°C for 30 min) (Figure S8).
Owing to the strong LSPR band at 680 nm of NOPs, it is worthy to evaluate their dual potential as photothermal conversion and photoacoustic contrast agents. To evaluate their photothermal conversion performance, aqueous solutions of PEG-modified NOPs with the same optical density at 660 nm (OD660nm) of 1.0 were exposed to the 660 nm laser at different power densities (0.50–2.0 W/cm2) as shown in Figure 5A. Additionally, PEG-modified NOPs with different optical densities (ODs) (0.10–1.0) were irradiated by the laser at 1.0 W/cm2 (Figure 5B). After the laser irradiation, PEG-modified NOPs showed negligible shifting of their LSPR band and kept their morphology unchanged as well (Figure S9). The temperature variation was strongly depended on the laser power and concentration of NOPs (Figures 5A,B). Table S2 lists the photothermal conversion values of NOPs calculated by using a modified model similar to the report by Roper et al. (Roper et al., 2007; Shao et al., 2016). NOPs showed excellent photothermal conversion efficiencies with a maximum value up to 83.0%. The ultrahigh conversion value is attributed to the narrow LSPR band of NOPs. In addition, the solution of NOPs also presented a strong photoacoustic signal at 680 nm wavelength. The photoacoustic intensity was linearly proportional to the concentration of NOPs with R2 = 0.987, suggesting the NOPs as a promise photoacoustic contrast agent.
Figure 5
Conclusion
Monodisperse NOPs were synthesized through a kinetically controlled growth with a high yield and ultra-narrow LSPR band width. The synergistic reducing effects of AA and 1-MP were important for the kinetically controlled scenario of Vdep ≫ Vdiff, resulting the formation of the highly branched NOPs along eight <111> directions. The uniform of the number, size, and orientation of their branches makes NOPs their remarkable LSPR properties with ultra-narrow LSPR band. The NOPs offer outstanding properties in bio-applications such as photothermal therapy with high photothermal conversion efficiencies up to 83.0% and a promise photoacoustic contrast agent in photoacoustic imaging. Owing to their excellent LSPR properties, the NOPs are highly promising in diverse applications, such as sensing, nanodevices, catalysis, and bio-applications.
Statements
Author contributions
Y-XC performed the experiments and analyzed the data; H-MG and Z-YL performed the Density Functional Theory calculations; N-NZ and X-FT provided assistance in the experiments; KL, BY, JZ, and TS designed the experiments; KL and Y-XC wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
KL thanks the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21474040, 21674042) and China's Thousand Talent Plan for financial support. KL and Z-YL gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21534004). JZ, KL, and BY thank for the support of JLU Science and Technology Innovative Research Team 2017TD-06. KL and TS thank for Interdisciplinary Innovation Project of the First Hospital of Jilin University (JDYYJCHX001).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2018.00335/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AverittR. D.SarkarD.HalasN. J. (1997). Plasmon resonance shifts of Au-coated Au2S nanoshells: insight into multicomponent nanoparticle growth. Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4217–4220. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4217
2
BlöchlP. E. (1994). Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B50, 17953–17979. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953
3
BolesM. A.LingD.HyeonT.TalapinD. V. (2016). The surface science of nanocrystals. Nat. Mater.15, 141–153. 10.1038/nmat4526
4
ChenS.WangZ. L.BallatoJ.FoulgerS. H.CarrollD. L. (2003). Monopod, bipod, tripod, and tetrapod gold nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc.125, 16186–16187. 10.1021/ja038927x
5
ChengK.KothapalliS. R.LiuH.KohA. L.JokerstJ. V.JiangH.et al. (2014). Construction and validation of nano gold tripods for molecular imaging of living subjects. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136, 3560–3571. 10.1021/ja412001e
6
DamD. H. M.LeeJ. H.SiscoP. N.CoD. T.ZhangM.WasielewskiM. R.et al. (2012). Direct observation of nanoparticle–cancer cell nucleus interactions. ACS Nano6, 3318–3326. 10.1021/nn300296p
7
GoiaD. V.MatijevićE. (1999). Tailoring the particle size of monodispersed colloidal gold. Colloids Surf. A146, 139–152. 10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00790-0
8
Guerrero-MartínezA.BarbosaS.Pastoriza-SantosI.Liz-MarzánL. M. (2011). Nanostars shine bright for you: colloidal synthesis, properties and applications of branched metallic nanoparticles. Colloid Interface Sci. 16, 118–127. 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.12.007
9
HafnerJ. (2008). Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: density-functional theory and beyond. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 2044–2078. 10.1002/jcc.21057
10
HaoE.BaileyR. C.SchatzG. C.HuppJ. T.LiS. (2004). Synthesis and optical properties of “branched” gold nanocrystals. Nano Lett.4, 327–330. 10.1021/nl0351542
11
HoggardA.WangL. Y.MaL.FangY.YouG.OlsonJ.et al. (2013). Using the plasmon linewidth to calculate the time and efficiency of electron transfer between gold nanorods and graphene. ACS Nano7, 11209–11217. 10.1021/nn404985h
12
IndrasekaraA. S. D. S.MeyersS.ShubeitaS.FeldmanL. C.GustafssonT.FabrisL. (2014). Gold nanostar substrates for SERS-based chemical sensing in the femtomolar regime. Nanoscale6, 8891–8899. 10.1039/C4NR02513J
13
JanaN. R.GearheartL.MurphyC. J. (2001). Wet chemical synthesis of high aspect ratio cylindrical gold nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. B105, 4065–4067. 10.1021/jp0107964
14
KellyK. L.CoronadoE.ZhaoL. L.SchatzG. C. (2003). The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J. Phys. Chem. B107, 668–677. 10.1021/jp026731y
15
KhouryC. G.Vo-DinhT. (2008). Gold nanostars for surface-enhanced Raman scattering: synthesis, characterization and optimization. J. Phys. Chem. C112, 18849–18859. 10.1021/jp8054747
16
KimF.ConnorS.SongH.KuykendallT.YangP. (2004). Platonic gold nanocrystals. Angew. Chem.116, 3759–3763. 10.1002/ange.200454216
17
KumarP. S.Pastoriza-SantosI.Rodríguez-GonzálezB.García de AbajoF. J.Liz-MarzánL. M. (2007). High-yield synthesis and optical response of gold nanostars. Nanotechnology19, 015606–015611. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/01/015606
18
KunduS. (2013). A new route for the formation of Au nanowires and application of shape-selective Au nanoparticles in SERS studies. J. Mater. Chem. C1, 831–842. 10.1039/C2TC00315E
19
LiN.ZhaoP.AstrucD. (2014). Anisotropic gold nanoparticles: synthesis, properties, applications, and toxicity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1756–1789. 10.1002/anie.201300441
20
LimB.XiaY. (2011). Metal nanocrystals with highly branched morphologies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.50, 76–85. 10.1002/anie.201002024
21
LinkS.El-SayedM. A. (2000). Shape and size dependence of radiative, non-radiative and photothermal properties of gold nanocrystals. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.19, 409–453. 10.1080/01442350050034180
22
LiuK.ZhaoN.KumachevaE. (2011). Self-assembly of inorganic nanorods. Chem. Soc. Rev.40, 656–671. 10.1039/c0cs00133c
23
LiuM.Guyot-SionnestP. (2005). Mechanism of silver (I)-assisted growth of gold nanorods and bipyramids. J. Phys. Chem. B109, 22192–22200. 10.1021/jp054808n
24
MalikovaN.Pastoriza-SantosI.SchierhornM.KotovN. A.Liz-MarzánL. M. (2002). Layer-by-layer assembled mixed spherical and planar gold nanoparticles: control of interparticle interactions. Langmuir18, 3694–3697. 10.1021/la025563y
25
MayerK. M.HafnerJ. H. (2011). Localized surface plasmon resonance sensors. Chem. Rev.111, 3828–3857. 10.1021/cr100313v
26
MetsO. M.de JongP. A.van GinnekenB.GietemaH. A.LammersJ. W. J. (2012). Quantitative computed tomography in COPD: possibilities and limitations. Lung190, 133–145. 10.1007/s00408-011-9353-9
27
MonkhorstH. J.PackJ. D. (1976). Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B13, 5188–5192. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188
28
NehlC. L.LiaoH.HafnerJ. H. (2006). Optical properties of star-shaped gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett.6, 683–688. 10.1021/nl052409y
29
NewmanJ. D. S.BlanchardG. J. (2006). Formation of gold nanoparticles using amine reducing agents. Langmuir22, 5882–5887. 10.1021/la060045z
30
NikoobakhtB.El-SayedM. A. (2003). Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method. Chem. Mater.15, 1957–1962. 10.1021/cm020732l
31
NiuW.ChuaY. A. A.ZhangW.HuangH.LuX. (2015). Highly symmetric gold nanostars: crystallographic control and surface-enhanced Raman scattering property. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 10460–10463. 10.1021/jacs.5b05321
32
ParkK.DrummyL. F.WadamsR. C.KoernerH.NepalD.FabrisL.et al. (2013). Growth mechanism of gold nanorods. Chem. Mater.25, 555–563. 10.1021/cm303659q
33
PerdewJ. P.BurkeK.ErnzerhofM. (1996). Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865–3868. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
34
RoperD. K.AhnW.HoepfnerM. (2007). Microscale heat transfer transduced by surface plasmon resonant gold nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C111, 3636–3641. 10.1021/jp064341w
35
ShankarS. S.RaiA.AnkamwarB.SinghA.AhmadA.SastryM. (2004). Biological synthesis of triangular gold nanoprisms. Nat. Mater.3, 482–488. 10.1038/nmat1152
36
ShaoJ.XieH.HuangH.LiZ.SunZ.XuY.et al. (2016). Biodegradable black phosphorus-based nanospheres for in vivo photothermal cancer therapy. Nat. Commun. 7, 12967–12979. 10.1038/ncomms12967
37
SkrabalakS. E.ChenJ.SunY.LuX.AuL.CobleyC. M.et al. (2008). Gold nanocages: synthesis, properties, and applications. Acc. Chem. Res.41, 1587–1595. 10.1021/ar800018v
38
SmithA. F.WeinerR. G.SkrabalakS. E. (2016). Symmetry-dependent optical properties of stellated nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C120, 20563–20571. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12280
39
SönnichsenC.FranzlT.WilkT.von PlessenG.FeldmannJ.WilsonO.et al. (2002). Drastic reduction of plasmon damping in gold nanorods. Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 077402. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.077402
40
SunY.XiaY. (2002). Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science298, 2176–2179. 10.1126/science.1077229
41
WangY.BlackK. C. L.LuehmannH.LiW.ZhangY.CaiX.et al. (2013). Comparison study of gold nanohexapods, nanorods, and nanocages for photothermal cancer treatment. ACS Nano7, 2068–2077. 10.1021/nn304332s
42
WangY.HeJ.LiuC.ChongW. H.ChenH. (2015a). Thermodynamics versus kinetics in nanosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.54, 2022–2051. 10.1002/anie.201402986
43
WangY.SerranoA. B.SentosunK.BalsS.Liz-MarzánL. M. (2015b). Stabilization and encapsulation of gold nanostars mediated by dithiols. Small11, 4314–4320. 10.1002/smll.201500703
44
WeiQ.SongH. M.LeonovA. P.HaleJ. A.OhD.OngQ. K.et al. (2009). Gyromagnetic imaging: dynamic optical contrast using gold nanostars with magnetic cores. J. Am. Chem. Soc.131, 9728–9734. 10.1021/ja901562j
45
XiaX.XieS.LiuM.PengH. C.LuN.WangJ.et al. (2013). On the role of surface diffusion in determining the shape or morphology of noble-metal nanocrystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110, 6669–6673. 10.1073/pnas.1222109110
46
XiaY.XiaX.PengH. C. (2015). Shape-controlled synthesis of colloidal metal nanocrystals: thermodynamic versus kinetic products. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 7947–7966. 10.1021/jacs.5b04641
47
YeE.RegulacioM. D.ZhangS. Y.LohX. J.HanM. Y. (2015). Anisotropically branched metal nanostructures. Chem. Soc. Rev.44, 6001–6017. 10.1039/C5CS00213C
48
YuanH.FalesA. M.Vo-DinhT. (2012). TAT peptide-functionalized gold nanostars: enhanced intracellular delivery and efficient NIR photothermal therapy using ultralow irradiance. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134, 11358–11361. 10.1021/ja304180y
49
ZhangH.LiW.JinM.ZengJ.YuT.YangD.et al. (2010). Controlling the morphology of rhodium nanocrystals by manipulating the growth kinetics with a syringe pump. Nano Lett.11, 898–903. 10.1021/nl104347j
50
ZhangJ.LangilleM. R.PersonickM. L.ZhangK.LiS.MirkinC. A. (2010). Concave cubic gold nanocrystals with high-index facets. J. Am. Chem. Soc.132, 14012–14014. 10.1021/ja106394k
51
ZhuX.ZhuoX.LiQ.YangZ.WangJ. (2016). Gold nanobipyramid-supported silver nanostructures with narrow plasmon linewidths and improved chemical stability. Adv. Funct. Mater26, 341–352. 10.1002/adfm.201503670
52
ZijlstraP.PauloP. M. R.YuK.XuQ. H.OrritM. (2012). Chemical interface damping in single gold nanorods and its near elimination by tip-specific functionalization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 8352–8355. 10.1002/anie.201202318
Summary
Keywords
nanooctopods, nanobranch, nanostar, ultra-narrow plasmon band width, photothermal conversion efficiency, photoacoustic imaging, synergistic reducing effect
Citation
Chang Y-X, Gao H-M, Zhang N-N, Tao X-F, Sun T, Zhang J, Lu Z-Y, Liu K and Yang B (2018) Synergistic Reducing Effect for Synthesis of Well-Defined Au Nanooctopods With Ultra-Narrow Plasmon Band Width and High Photothermal Conversion Efficiency. Front. Chem. 6:335. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00335
Received
08 June 2018
Accepted
19 July 2018
Published
10 August 2018
Volume
6 - 2018
Edited by
Jing Zhao, University of Connecticut, United States
Reviewed by
Yugang Sun, Temple University, United States; Xiaoji Xie, Nanjing Tech University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Chang, Gao, Zhang, Tao, Sun, Zhang, Lu, Liu and Yang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kun Liu kliu@jlu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Nanoscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.