Abstract
Among hydrogen storage materials, hydrogen hydrates have received a particular attention over the last decades. The pure hydrogen hydrate is generated only at extremely high-pressure (few thousands of bars) and the formation conditions are known to be softened by co-including guest molecules such as tetrahydrofuran (THF). Since this discovery, there have been considerable efforts to optimize the storage capacities in hydrates through the variability of the formation condition, of the cage occupancy, of the chemical composition or of the hydrate structure (ranging from clathrate to semi-clathrate). In addition to this issue, the hydrogen insertion mechanism plays also a crucial role not only at a fundamental level, but also in view of potential applications. This paper aims at studying the molecular hydrogen diffusion in the THF hydrate by in-situ confocal Raman microspectroscopy and imaging, and at investigating the impact of strong acid onto this diffusive process. This study represents the first report to shed light on hydrogen diffusion in acidic THF-H2 hydrate. Integrating the present result with those from previous experimental investigations, it is shown that the hydrogen insertion in the THF hydrate is optimum for a pressure of ca. 55 bar at 270 K. Moreover, the co-inclusion of perchloric acid (with concentration as low as 1 acidic molecules per 136 water molecules) lead to promote the molecular hydrogen insertion within the hydrate structure. The hydrogen diffusion coefficient—measured at 270 K and 200 bar—is improved by a factor of 2 thanks to the acidic additive.
Introduction
Hydrogen is the most abundant element on Earth and is considered as a clean and potential energy vector in the future. H2 storage and transportation are the subject of numerous studies. Among gas storage materials, hydrogen clathrate hydrates (also called hydrates) have received a particular attention over the last decades (Florusse et al., 2004; Veluswamy et al., 2014). Gas hydrates are crystalline inclusion compounds of hydrogen bonded water molecules forming cages encapsulating guest molecules (Sloan and Koh, 2008; Broseta et al., 2017; Ruffine et al., 2018). The pure H2 clathrate hydrate is generated only at extremely high-pressure (few thousands of bars) and at low temperature (~240 K) (Dyadin et al., 1999; Mao et al., 2002). The hydrate is then formed with H2 molecular species located in the small cages (SC) and in the large cages (LC) of the so-called sII hydrate (consisting of 16 SCs and 8 LCs) (Mao et al., 2002). To enable the storage of H2 under softer conditions (typically 50 bars and 280 K), the method consists in co-including H2 molecules with a second guest such as tetrahydrofuran (THF), to form a mixed THF-H2 sII hydrate (Florusse et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2005). However, THF molecules occupy the LC and H2 molecules are only in the SC, which leads to low hydrogen storage (<2 wt%) (Strobel et al., 2006; Mulder et al., 2008) and limits the potential applications (Nakayama et al., 2010). Since this discovery, there have been considerable efforts to optimize the storage capacities of H2 in clathrate hydrates through the variability of the formation condition, of the cage occupancy, of the chemical composition (by changing the promoter and its concentration) or of the cage structure (from clathrate to semi-clathrate) (Veluswamy et al., 2014).
Beyond the problematic of H2 storage capacity for potential applications, the H2 insertion mechanism plays is of fundamental interest. When H2 gas pressure is applied onto a powdered THF hydrate, the formation mechanism involves two steps: hydrogen adsorption onto the clathrate particle surface, followed by subsequent diffusion of hydrogen into the clathrate hydrate particle. The inter-cage diffusion represents the limiting step (timescale of the order of days), involving high activation energy (78.7 kJ/mol) (Nagai et al., 2008), confirmed by electronic structure calculations (Alavi and Ripmeester, 2007). To improve the storage capability of H2 in hydrates, one issue concerns the possibility of modifying the water cage relaxation. The dynamic properties of various hydrates have been investigated and water molecules reorients on a millisecond timescale (Sloan and Koh, 2008). Recently, it has been shown that water molecules relax on a nanosecond timescale in strong acid clathrate hydrates (Desmedt et al., 2004, 2013; Bedouret et al., 2014). Moreover, THF clathrate hydrate may be prepared by co-including strong acid molecules (Desmedt et al., 2015). Such chemical modification has an impact onto the lattice dynamics of the cages and on the melting points of the hydrates (Desmedt et al., 2015). However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been performed until now to investigate the H2 storage in such THF clathrate hydrates co-including strong acid species.
The description of the H2 insertion mechanism outlines the key role played by dynamical processes met in clathrate hydrates (Desmedt et al., 2012, 2017). At atmospheric pressure, only intra-cage diffusion of H2 is experimentally observed in the THF-H2 hydrate stability region (i.e., below ca. 270 K) (Pefoute et al., 2012). At higher pressure (typically several tens of bars), studies of molecular hydrogen diffusion into THF hydrates have been performed by means of NMR method (Okuchi et al., 2007), in situ neutron diffraction (Mulder et al., 2008), volumetric measurements (Nagai et al., 2008), theoretical calculations (Alavi and Ripmeester, 2007) and molecular dynamics simulations (Cao et al., 2013). These measurements, performed in various P-T thermodynamics conditions, lead to diffusion coefficient ranging from ca. 10−6 cm2/s to ca. 10−12 cm2/s. These results outline the importance of using an experimental method allowing the direct investigation of the spatial and time characteristics of the H2 diffusion within the hydrate. In this issue, confocal Raman microspectroscopy is a non-destructive approach and is particularly adapted for in situ investigation of transport process in nanoporous systems (Marti-Rujas et al., 2004, 2006, 2007). This vibrational technique is an interesting label-free tool to access the molecular composition, the molecular selectivity, the structural and dynamical information in gas hydrates (Chazallon et al., 2017; Petuya et al., 2017, 2018a,b; Petuya and Desmedt, 2019). Raman spectroscopy has been performed to study the hydrogen storage in hydrates (Florusse et al., 2004; Ogata et al., 2008; Strobel et al., 2009; Grim et al., 2012) and it has been shown that THF hydrates may act as a molecular sieving for hydrogen-containing gas mixtures (Zhong et al., 2017). This paper aims at studying the H2 diffusion mechanism in the THF clathrate hydrate by in situ confocal Raman microspectroscopy and imaging, and at investigating the impact of strong acid onto this diffusive process at 200 bar pressure. To address this issue, we use two different sII hydrogen hydrate formed with THF promoter: THF-H2 hydrate (non-acidic) and the THF-HClO4-H2 hydrate (acidic).
Experimental Details
Samples
Two solutions were prepared with the following molar ratio 8THF·136H2O (melting at 277 K) and 7THF−1HClO4·136H2O (melting at 271 K) using ultra-pure water (Milli-Q quality) and commercially available chemicals (70% HClO4 aqueous solution and 99.9% THF from Sigma-Aldrich). They were transferred under inert atmosphere in the lab-made high-pressure optical cell used for the Raman spectroscopic analysis. According to a procedure previously published (Desmedt et al., 2015), the hydrates have been formed under stirring conditions by cooling the sample temperature to 270 K and maintaining this temperature for 24 h with the help of a modified cryogenic stage (Linkam Scientific Instruments Ltd., UK). Once the hydrate is formed, hydrogen gas (99.9999% Air Liquide) was then applied at constant pressure (200 bar) with a PM High Pressure pump (Top Industrie, Vaux-le-Penil, France) which contains 100 cm3 of gas.
Raman Scattering and Imaging
Raman data were collected with a Labram microspectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France) and using a 514 nm laser source (10 mW power at the sample). A 50X objective (NA = 0.45, Olympus) permitted to focus the incident laser beam and to collect the Raman scattering. The Raman scattering was dispersed with a holographic grating of 1,800 g/mm and analyzed with a Peltier-cooled CCD detector (Andor, Belfast, UK), which permitted to measure the Raman spectra with a spectral resolution of 1 cm−1. The data was collected on a spectral range from 2,700 to 4,300 cm−1 to monitor the hydrogen stretching modes. To probe the H2 diffusion into the preformed hydrate as a function of time, micro-Raman spectra and imaging were collected in situ under the 200 bar H2 pressure at 270 K in the hydrate stability zone (Hashimoto et al., 2007). The measurement has been started simultaneously with the application of H2 pressure (corresponding to time t = 0 h in the following). For recording the spectral images, a motorized stage was used to map the sample in a point-by-point mode using a 20 μm step size in the two XZ plane perpendicular to the gas-hydrate interface contained in the XY plane (Figure 1). For each sample, an area of about 200 × 1,200 μm2 from the H2/hydrate interface to 1,000 μm depths in the hydrate by Raman micro-imaging. In the following, Z = 0 μm corresponds to the gas-hydrate interface. Raman intensity depth profiles of inserted H2 were corrected from the refraction by using standard procedure (Everall, 2000; Desmedt et al., 2007) with a refraction index n = 1,33 (Sloan and Koh, 2008) for the hydrate.
Figure 1
Results and Discussion
In the present investigation, two hydrates have been considered: the THF hydrate (formed with a THF·17H2O solution) and the mixed THF-HClO4 hydrate (formed with a 0.875THF-0.125HClO4·17H2O solution). In these sII hydrates, the SCs are empty to welcome H2 molecules, the THF molecules occupy the LC and the acidic additive HClO4 is inserted within the LC by replacing one THF per unit cell in average (Desmedt et al., 2015). The insertion of molecular hydrogen within these two preformed hydrates has been probed thanks to real-time Raman imaging. An example of the spectral region corresponding to the gaseous H2 and confined H2 signatures is shown in Figure 1A for the THF-H2 hydrate formed within the lab-made high-pressure optical cell after 1 day at 200 bars and 270 K. The rotation-vibration coupled bands of gaseous H2 are observed at 4,130, 4,147, 4,155, and 4,164 cm−1. In the case of the THF-H2 hydrate, the band at 4,130 cm−1 is assigned to the Raman signal of H2 confined in the sII hydrate SCs (Ogata et al., 2008; Strobel et al., 2009; Grim et al., 2012). To monitor the insertion of hydrogen within the hydrate, Raman imaging has been performed in the plane perpendicular to the gas/hydrate interface (see Figure 1B). An example of visualization of the H2 molecules confined in the hydrate is shown in Figure 1C through the Raman mapping of the ratio of the band intensity at 4,130 cm−1 and of the one at 4,155 cm−1. The Raman intensity being proportional to the encapsulated species concentration (Zhong et al., 2017), such a Raman image is a direct signature of the spatial H2 distribution within the preformed THF hydrate; after 1 day of pressurization, one can observe that H2 has mainly be inserted within few tens of micrometers below the hydrate surface. In order to spatially analyse the extension of H2 insertion, one needs to locate the gas/hydrate interface at a micrometric scale. In this purpose, the intensity profiles of the H2 vibron and of the OH stretching modes have been measured with the help of the projection of the acquired Raman spectra in the XZ plane along the Z axis (see Figure 1B). An example of such averaged profiles is shown in Figure 2 (left) for the measurement at initial stage (t = 0 h) of H2 pressurization at 200 bar and at T = 270 K. A pseudo-Voigt function has been used to reproduce the experimental data of the OH integrated intensity profile and the H2 intensity profile has been fitted with a sigmoidal function. The fitted functions reproduce with a good agreement the experimental data (the residual error between experimental and modeled curves reached a value of 10−3). The gas/hydrate interface is then clearly identified at the intersection of these two curves: it corresponds to the Z coordinate of the inflection point of the H2 sigmoidal curve. This procedure allows to accurately determine the Z position of the gas/hydrate interface and is set as the reference distance Z = 0 μm. Moreover, the H2 vibron intensity profile can be used as a signature of the H2 diffusion front position as a function of time. This is shown in Figure 2 (right): the H2 intensity profiles of THF-HClO4-H2 hydrate after 12 h of pressurization is clearly Z-shifted with respect to the profile at initial time t = 0 h. This Z difference of the H2 diffusion front is the signature of the insertion of H2 molecule within the hydrate sample; it is defined as the mean H2 diffusion length, ΔZ(t):
where Z(t) corresponds to the inflection point of the H2 sigmoidal curve at time t. To subsequently analyse the time-evolution of the H2 insertion, such H2 Raman intensity profiles have been recorded every 12 h over a period of 3 days. In order to evaluate the impact of the strong acid HClO4 additive, these measurements have been performed onto the preformed THF hydrate and onto the preformed THF-HClO4 hydrate, both pressurized with H2 gas at 270 K and 200 bar. The time evolution of the H2 intensity profiles is shown in Figure 3 for the THF-HClO4-H2 hydrate and for the THF-H2 hydrate. It can be observed a marked difference between these time evolutions: the H2 diffusion front extend over a wider range in the case of the THF-HClO4 hydrates compared to the case of the THF hydrate, i.e., without acidic additives. In order to quantitatively analyse the time evolution of the H2 diffusion front within the hydrates, each intensity profile has been fitted by using the sigmoidal function as previous described, allowing to measure the position of the H2 diffusion front as a function of time. Such procedure allows to measure the H2 diffusion lengths (Equation 1) as a function of time. Their mean-squared values 〈ΔZ(t)2〉 are reported in Figure 4. These curves show clearly the improvement of the H2 insertion when acidic additive are included in the THF hydrate: the values are higher for the THF-HClO4 hydrate than for the THF hydrate.
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Furthermore, such curves provide the opportunity to investigate the H2 insertion mechanism. Such diffusive mechanism may include various elementary processes including the inter-cage diffusion and possible contributions associated with grain boundaries, chemical and structural defects. Let first consider two principal diffusive models by analogy with nanoporous systems (Marti-Rujas et al., 2007): conventional diffusion or single-file-like diffusion. The conventional diffusion corresponds to the Fick law for which the mean-squared H2 diffusion length is given by the Einstein diffusion model in a three-dimensional system:
where D is the H2 diffusion coefficient. The Fick behavior may reproduce not only the inter-cage diffusion, but also the diffusion associated with grain boundaries and structural defects. The single-file-like diffusive model may be considered for the H2 inter-cage diffusion. Indeed, the H2 molecule dimension is comparable to the diameter of the polygonal faces of the water cages. In such a model, H2 molecule diffusion within a water cage may proceed under the condition that there is a vacant guest site in the neighboring cage—unlike in the case of Fick behavior for which H2 molecules can overtake each other in the cages. This phenomenon involves correlations between the H2 displacements within the hydrate and thus the time-dependence of 〈ΔZ(t)2〉 differs from the Fick diffusion:
where M correspond to the H2 mobility in the three-dimensional hydrate system. The time dependence of 〈ΔZ(t)2〉 exhibit a clear linear behavior (it has not been possible to reproduce the experimental data with the single-file-like model). It thus implies that H2 molecules can overtake each other in a cage and mainly follows a fick behavior. such a diffusive behavior is in full agreement with NMR (Okuchi et al., 2007), in situ neutron diffraction (Mulder et al., 2008), volumetric measurements (Nagai et al., 2008), Raman (Zhong et al., 2017), and molecular dynamics (Cao et al., 2013). The Fick law given by Equation (2) have been fitted to the experimental data with an excellent agreement (see Figure 4-Left). The fitted diffusion coefficients are of 7.98 ± 0.03 10−11 cm2/s for the THF hydrate and 1.46 ± 0.03 10−10 cm2/s for the THF-HClO4 hydrate at 270 K and 200 bar. The obtained diffusion coefficient for the H2 insertion in the THF-H2 hydrate is within the broad range of values obtained by various experimental methods and reported in Figure 4-Right. The present study confirms the trend of an optimum pressure for promoting the hydrogen diffusion at ca. 55 bar. Such a behavior reflects a trend regarding the transport of hydrogen molecules between the cages: the inter-cage diffusion is slower when a large fraction of the small cage is already filled, or even doubly filled with H2 as reported from Molecular Dynamics simulations (Cao et al., 2013). Once the small cage of the sII THF hydrate are filled, structural or chemical defects and grain boundaries should play a key-role for insuring the Fickian H2 diffusion through and within the sII THF hydrate. Indeed, the behavior observed with the THF-HClO4 hydrate confirms the importance of such defects: a clear quantitative enhancement of the H2 diffusion in the THF hydrate is measured thanks to the co-inclusion of HClO4 in the sII structure (Figure 4-Left). As reported in previous studies (Desmedt et al., 2015), the inclusion of HClO4 into the THF hydrate lead to generate perchlorate anions confined in the LC and acidic protons delocalized within the water cage structure (this delocalization is at the origin of the super-protonic conductivity met in strong acid hydrates; Desmedt et al., 2004, 2013). In such a case, the cages are constituted not only of water molecules, but also of hydronium ions. The energy barrier related to H2 molecules diffusion through the water cage being higher for SC than for LC (Okuchi et al., 2007), the inclusion of such ionic defects in the hydrate lead to modify the flexibility of the cage, as reported from Raman measurements of the water cage phonons (Desmedt et al., 2015). This increased flexibility of the water cage—especially of the SCs welcoming the H2—may lead to decrease the energy barrier required for an H2 molecule to cross the faces of the water cage and thus to facilitate the inter-cage diffusion, as reflected by the enhanced diffusion coefficient measured in the THF-HClO4.
Conclusion
The present investigation represents the first report to shed light on the impact of ionic defects onto the hydrogen insertion within hydrate. This study has been realized by comparing the H2 diffusion within the THF hydrate and the mixed THF-HClO4 hydrate, both being sII structure. Raman confocal microspectroscopy and imaging has been a powerful tool. It yields the measurement of the H2 Fickian diffusion coefficients within the two hydrates at 270 K and 200 bar: 7.98 ± 0.03 10−11 cm2/s for the THF hydrate and 1.46 ± 0.03 10−10 cm2/s for the THF-HClO4 hydrate. In the case of the THF hydrate, it is shown that the H2 diffusion within the hydrate is optimum for a pressure of ca. 55 bar by compiling this result with those from the literature. Moreover, this investigation clearly shows the enhancement of the H2 insertion within the THF hydrate thanks to the co-inclusion of acidic additive: it acts as a “flexibilizer” of the water cage through the addition of chemical water H-bond defects (Desmedt et al., 2015) promoting the H2 inter-cage diffusion. Such results are particularly exciting and promising for applications in storage of hydrogen and open new routes for developing efficient hydrate-based hydrogen storage materials with new type of promoter.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
TN and CP have performed the sample preparation, the Raman scattering experiments, and data acquisition. DT has contributed to the Raman spectrometer configuration and data management. TN and AD has analyzed, interpreted the data, and has written the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work falls in the frame of the project ANR 2011-JS08-002-01, funded by the French ANR Agence Nationale de la Recherche. The Raman scattering experiments have been performed on equipment of the Vibrational Spectroscopy and Imaging platform (SIV at ISM), funded by the Conseil Régional de Nouvelle Aquitaine and Europe (FEDER programme).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AlaviS.RipmeesterJ. A. (2007). Hydrogen-gas migration through clathrate hydrate cages. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.46, 6102–6105. 10.1002/ange.200790242
2
BedouretL.JudeinsteinP.OllivierJ.CombetJ.DesmedtA. (2014). Proton diffusion in the hexafluorophosphoric acid clathrate hydrate. J. Phys. Chem. B118, 13357–13364. 10.1021/jp504128m
3
BrosetaD.RuffineL.DesmedtA. (2017). Gas Hydrates 1: Fundamentals, Characterization and Modeling. London: Wiley–ISTE.
4
CaoH.EnglishN. J.MacElroyJ. M. D. (2013). Diffusive hydrogen inter-cage migration in hydrogen and hydrogen-tetrahydrofuran clathrate hydrates. J. Chem. Phys. 138:094507. 10.1063/1.4793468
5
ChazallonB.NobleJ.DesmedtA. (2017). “Spectroscopy of gas hydrates: from fundamental aspects to chemical engineering, geophysical and astrophysics applications,” in Gas Hydrates 1: Fundamentals, Characterization and Modeling, eds BrosetaD.RuffineL.DesmedtA. D. (London, UK: Wiley–ISTE), 63–112.
6
DesmedtA.BedouretL.OllivierJ.PetuyaC. (2017). “Neutron scattering of clathrate and semi-clathrate hydrates,” in Gas Hydrates 1: Fundamentals, Characterization and Modeling, eds BrosetaD.RuffineL.DesmedtA. (London, UK: Wiley–ISTE), 1–62. 10.1002/9781119332688.ch1
7
DesmedtA.BedouretL.PefouteE.PouvreauM.Say-Liang-FatS.AlvarezM. (2012). Energy landscape of clathrate hydrates. Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics213, 103–127. 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01666-3
8
DesmedtA.LechnerR. E.LassèguesJ. C.GuillaumeF.CavagnatD.GrondinJ. (2013). Hydronium dynamics in the perchloric acid clathrate hydrate. Solid State Ion.252, 19–25. 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.06.004
9
DesmedtA.Martin-GondreL.NguyenT. T.PetuyaC.BarandiaranL.BabotO.et al. (2015). Modifying the flexibility of water cages by co-including acidic species within clathrate hydrate. J. Phys. Chem. C119, 8904–8911. 10.1021/jp511826b
10
DesmedtA.StallmachF.LechnerR. E.CavagnatD.LassèguesJ. C.GuillaumeF.et al. (2004). Proton dynamics in the perchloric acid clathrate hydrate HClO4-5.5H2O. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 11916–1192610.1063/1.1819863
11
DesmedtA.TalagaD.BruneelJ. L. (2007). Enhancement of the raman scattering signal due to a nanolens effect. Appl. Spectroscop. 61, 621–623. 10.1366/000370207781269837
12
DyadinY. A.LarionovE. G.AladkoE. Y.ManakovA. Y.ZhurkoF. V.MikinaT. V.et al. (1999). Clathrate formation in water-noble gas (Hydrogen) systems at high pressures. J. Struct. Chem. 40, 790–795. 10.1007/BF02903454
13
EverallN. J. (2000). Modeling and measuring the effect of refraction on the depth resolution of confocal raman microscopy. Appl. Spectrosc. 54:773. 10.1366/0003702001950382
14
FlorusseL. J.PetersC. J.SchoonmanJ.HesterK. C.KohC.DecS. F.et al. (2004). Stable low-pressure hydrogen clusters stored in a binary clathrate hydrate. Science306:469–471. 10.1126/science.1102076
15
GrimR. G.KerkarP. B.ShebowichM.AriasM.SloanE. D.KohC. A.et al. (2012). synthesis and characterization of sI clathrate hydrates containing hydrogen. J. Phys. Chem. C116, 18557–18563. 10.1021/jp307409s
16
HashimotoS.SugaharaT.SatoH.OhgakiK. (2007). Thermodynamic stability of H2 + tetrahydrofuran mixed gas hydrate in nonstoichiometric aqueous solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Data52, 517–520. 10.1021/je060436f
17
IizukaA.HayashiS.TajimaH.KiyonoF.YanagisawaY.YamasakiA. (2015). Gas separation using tetrahydrofuran clathrate hydrate crystals based on the molecular sieving effect. Sep. Purif. Technol. 139, 70–77. 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.10.023
18
LeeH.LeeJ.KimD. Y.ParkJ.SeoY.-T.ZengH.et al. (2005). Tuning clathrate hydrates for hydrogen storage. Nature434, 743–746. 10.1038/nature03457
19
MaoW. L.MaoH. K.GoncharovA. F.StruzhkinV. V.GuoQ. Z.HuJ. Z.et al. (2002). Hydrogen clusters in clathrate hydrate. Science297, 2247–2249. 10.1126/science.1075394
20
Marti-RujasJ.DesmedtA.HarrisK. D. M.GuillaumeF. (2004). Direct time-resolved and spatially resolved monitoring of molecular transport in a crystalline nanochannel system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 11124–11125. 10.1021/ja040117d
21
Marti-RujasJ.DesmedtA.HarrisK. D. M.GuillaumeF. (2007). Kinetics of molecular transport in a nanoporous crystal studied by confocal raman microspectrometry: single-file diffusion in a densely filled tunnel. J. Phys. Chem. B. (Letter)111, 12339–12344. 10.1021/jp076532k
22
Marti-RujasJ.HarrisK. D. M.DesmedtA.GuillaumeF. (2006). Significant conformational changes associated with molecular transport in a crystalline solid. J. Phys. Chem. B110, 10708–10713. 10.1021/jp060738o
23
MulderF. M.WagemakerM.van EijckL.KearleyG. J. (2008). Hydrogen in porous tetrahydrofuran clathrate hydrate. Chem. Phys. Chem. 9, 1331–1337. 10.1002/cphc.200700833
24
NagaiY.YoshiokaH.OtaM.SatoY.InomataH.SmithJ. R.et al. (2008). Binary hydrogen-tetrahydrofuran clathrate hydrate formation kinetics and models. AiChE J. 54, 3007–3016. 10.1002/aic.11587
25
NakayamaT.TomuraS.OzakiM.MoriH. M. (2010). Engineering investigation of hydrogen storage in the form of clathrate hydrates: conceptual design of hydrate production plants. Energy Fuels24, 2576–2588. 10.1021/ef100039a
26
OgataK.HashimotoS.SugaharaT.MoritokiM.SatoH.OhgakiK. (2008). Storage capacity of hydrogen in tetrahydrofuran hydrate. Chem. Eng. Sci. 63, 5714–5718. 10.1016/j.ces.2008.08.018
27
OkuchiT.MoudrakovskiI. L.RipmeesterJ. A. (2007). Efficient storage of hydrogen fuel into leaky cages of clathrate hydrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91:171903. 10.1063/1.2802041
28
PefouteE.KemnerE.SoetensJ. C.RussinaM.DesmedtA. (2012). Diffusive motions of molecular hydrogen confined in THF clathrate hydrate. J. Phys. Chem. C116, 16823–16829. 10.1021/jp3008656
29
PetuyaC.DamayF.ChazallonB.BruneelJ. L.DesmedtA. (2018a). Guest partitioning and metastability of the nitrogen gas hydrate. J. Phys. Chem. C122, 566–573. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10151
30
PetuyaC.DamayF.DesplancheS.TalagaD.DesmedtA. (2018b). Selective trapping of CO2 gas and cage occupancy in CO2-N2 and CO2-CO mixed gas hydrates. Chem. Comm. 54, 4290–4293. 10.1039/C8CC00538A
31
PetuyaC.DamayF.TalagaD.DesmedtA. (2017). Guest partitioning in carbon monoxide hydrate by raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C121, 13798–13802. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04947
32
PetuyaC.DesmedtA. (2019). Revealing CO-preferential encapsulation in the mixed CO-N2 clathrate hydrate. J. Phys. Chem. C123, 4871–4878. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11680
33
RuffineL.BrosetaD.DesmedtA. (2018). Gas Hydrates 2: Geoscience Issues and Potential Industrial Applications. London: Wiley–ISTE.
34
SloanE. D.KohC. A. (2008). Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
35
StrobelT. A.SloanE. D.KohC. A. (2009). Raman spectroscopic studies of hydrogen clathrate hydrates. J. Chem. Phys. 130:014506. 10.1063/1.3046678
36
StrobelT. A.TaylorC. J.HesterK. C.DecS. F.KohC. A.MillerK. T.et al. (2006). Molecular hydrogen occupancy in binary THF–H2 clathrate hydrates by high resolution neutron diffraction. J. Phys. Chem. B110, 14024–14027. 10.1021/jp062139n
37
VeluswamyH. P.KumarR.LingaP. (2014). Hydrogen storage in clathrate hydrates: current state of the art and future directions. Appl. Energ. 122, 112–132. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.063
38
ZhongJ. R.ChenL. T.LiuT. C.ZengX. Y.SunY. F.SunC. Y.et al. (2017). Sieving of hydrogen-containing gas mixtures with tetrahydrofuran hydrate. J. Phys. Chem. C121, 27822–27829. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08945
Summary
Keywords
strong acid, hydrogen storage, tetrahydrofuran, hydrates, clathrates, Raman spectroscopy
Citation
Nguyen TT, Pétuya C, Talaga D and Desmedt A (2020) Promoting the Insertion of Molecular Hydrogen in Tetrahydrofuran Hydrate With the Help of Acidic Additives. Front. Chem. 8:550862. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.550862
Received
10 April 2020
Accepted
03 September 2020
Published
14 October 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Amadeu K. Sum, Colorado School of Mines, United States
Reviewed by
Kyuchul Shin, Kyungpook National University, South Korea; Ryo Ohmura, Keio University, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Nguyen, Pétuya, Talaga and Desmedt.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Arnaud Desmedt arnaud.desmedt@u-bordeaux.fr
This article was submitted to Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.