Abstract
Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) and related extended organic materials have been widely used as photocatalysts in the last few years. Such interest arises from the wide range of covalent linkages employed in their construction, which offer many possibilities to design extended frameworks and to link photoactive building blocks. Thus, the potential utility of predesigned organic photoactive fragments can be synergistically added to the inherent advantages of heterogeneous catalysis, such as recyclability and easy separation of catalyst. In this overview, the current state of the art on the design of organic materials for photocatalytic oxidation reactions will be presented. The designing process of these materials is usually conditioned by the generally accepted concept that crystallinity and porosity defines the quality of the heterogeneous catalysts obtained. The care for the structural integrity of materials obtained is understandable because many properties and applications are intimately related to these features. However, the catalytic activity does not always directly depends on these characteristics. A critical compilation of the available literature is performed in order to offer a general perspective of the use of COFs and Covalent Triazine Frameworks (CTFs) in photocatalytic oxidation processes, including water oxidation, which constitute an important outcome relevant to artificial photosynthesis.
Introduction
Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) is an emerging family of laminar or 3D porous materials only composed by organic linkers connected through covalent bonds. Thus, they are constituted by earth abundant elements, and show high stability, low toxicity, low density and adjustable pore size, chemical structure and functionality. Therefore, applications of COFs have been reported in a variety of areas, such as storage and separation of gases, energy storage, drug delivery, proton conduction, optoelectronics and catalysis (Ding and Wang, 2013). Another family of materials closely related are Covalent triazine-based frameworks (CTFs) which are assembled through nitrile trimerization. CTFs have been identified for photocatalytic applications (López-Magano et al., 2020a). Conjugated organic frameworks offer the opportunity to design catalytic heterogeneous systems allowing easy separation of the catalyst as well as their recyclability. Furthermore, the photocatalytic performance of COFs, and their amorphous analogs, has been induced by designing highly conjugated extended structures or by incorporating pre-dedetermined photoactive units into the framework. Therefore, photocatalytic applications of reticular organic materials have been reported in the areas of organic chemical synthesis, degradation of pollutants, CO2 reduction and water splitting, among others (Bonesi et al., 2006; Dad’ová et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2014; Fang et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2016; Shaw et al., 2016; Mandal et al., 2017; Zhu and Zhang, 2017; Samanta et al., 2019; López-Magano et al., 2020a; Song et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020).
This overview presents a brief description of the state of the art on photocatalytic oxidation reactions using porous organic materials. In particular, two different approaches with distinct requirements are shown. First, oxygen molecule activation is a valuable synthetic tool to have access to products of diverse complexity through an environmentally benign process that uses oxygen as final oxidant and light as energy source to overcome thermodynamic and/or kinetic barriers (Shaw et al., 2016). On the other hand, oxygen evolving water oxidation is a more complex process, which implies the transfer of four electrons coupled to the formation of a O-O bond. In fact, this transformation is the most challenging half reaction of water splitting due to the thermodynamic and kinetic challenges that presents (Song et al., 2020). Very rencently, as shown in the next paragraphs, organic materials started to be considered as good platforms to perform this process in a photocatalytic manner. Overall, the reports compiled in this short overview represents the initial steps of a promising research field with deep social and economic implications.
Aerobic Photo-Oxidation of Organic Molecules
In industry, oxidation reactions are employed for the obtention of aldehydes, epoxides, alcohols, and ketones, among others. The use of organic peroxides, permanganates and dichromates have traditionally been employed in these oxidations, and therefore harmful byproducts are produced. On the other hand, the use of molecular oxygen as final oxidant and heterogeneous photocatalysts results in more sustainable and greener reactions (
Guo et al., 2014). The use of oxygen to perform this transformation is usually described by two plausible mechanisms: an electron transfer or an energy transfer (
Figure 1, left). In the former, the photocatalyst undergoes a charge separation under light irradiation. Then, substrate
Ais oxidized to its corresponding cationic radical
A·+by the formed holes of the photocatalyst, while O
2is reduced to O
2−·by the photogenerated electrons (electron transfer mechanism). Finally, the
Productis formed when the cationic radical
A·+intermediate, reacts with the active oxygen species. In the later, conversion of
3O
2into
1O
2takes place as a consequence of an energy transfer process between the triplet excited state of the catalytic fragment and oxygen in its ground state. Then, singlet oxygen reacts with substrate
Aand generates the final
Product. The differentiation of one or another pathway can be precluded using selective scavengers [e.g., 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) for singlet oxygen (
Bonesi et al., 2006) or 1,4-dimethoxybenzene for superoxide radical anion (
Dad’ová et al., 2012)]. Interestingly, is common to observe that both mechanisms can operate concurrently. In the following lines, we will mention the main aerobic oxidation transformations using photocatalytic COFs (
Figure 1, right).
a) Photocatalytic oxidation of alcohols: The first example to perform this reaction was reported in 2017 for a thiophene-containing Covalent Triazine Framework (CTF) (CTF-Th@SBA-15) (Huang et al., 2017). Later, a hybrid material consisting TiO2 nanobelts coated with an imine-based COF (TiO2@COF-3) was used to perform benzylic alcohol oxidation under visible light irradiation (Lu et al., 2019). This material presented an enhanced photocatalytic activity related to the possibility of charge transfer from COF to TiO2. On the other hand, in 2020, a hybrid MOF–COF, NH2-MIL-125@TAPB-PDA-3, shown similar photocatalytic properties (Lu et al., 2020).
b) Selective Sulfoxidation Reactions: Sulfoxides are prevalent structures in agriculture and pharmaceutical industries (Wojaczyńska and Wojaczyński, 2010). Therefore, a common model reaction studied in photocatalytic systems is the selective sulfoxidation of organic sulfides. Three different undecorated imine-based materials were published by our group (a 3D-COF, a layered-COF, and a spherical-COF), which showed good results in the photocatalytic sulfoxidation under green reaction conditions (water and ethanol as solvents) (Jiménez-Almarza et al., 2019). In addition, 2 N, N′-bicarbazole-based CTFs, BC-CTF, and Ph-BC-CTF, were able to perform the same reaction (Yan et al., 2019). Later on, a 2D and a 3D Pd-containing porphyrinic COFs, 2D-PdPor-COF and 3D-PdPor-COF, performed in a very efficient manner the oxidation of sulfides (Meng et al., 2020). Furthermore, h-LZU1, a nanostructured COF, showed a slightly worse recyclability and selectivity in photocatalytic sulfoxidation of organic sulfides (Liu et al., 2020a). Very recently, our group reported the attachment of PtII-hydroxyquinoline fragments in defective sites of an imine-based COF structure. This metal fragment acted as photocatalytic center showing TON up to 8,000 with excellent stability and recyclability (López-Magano et al., 2020b).
c) Dehydrogenation of Secondary Amines: The selective oxidative dehydrogenation of secondary amines to imines is feasible due to the impossibility of the substrates to generate nitriles, but is limited by the steric hindrance around the N−H bond. Furthermore, the presence of two different α-CH bonds in asymmetric dibenzylamines can compromise the chemoselectivity, since it can be found two different oxidized products. As a consequence, the oxidation of symmetric dibenzylamine is the chosen reaction for the study of these coupling reactions, while asymmetric dibenzylamine examples still remain challenging (Chen et al., 2019a; Chen et al., 2019b). Both oxygen anion radical and singlet oxygen have been found as reactive oxygen species in this process. In addition, Por-sp2c-COF (cyanovinylene-based porphyrin-containing COF) was used for the synthesis of imine under photocatalytic conditions (Yan et al., 2019; Meng et al., 2020). Moreover, Por-sp2c-COF was also employed for the oxidation of secondary amines, using TEMPO as co-Catalyst, allowing the use of red light in a two-photon absorption process (Shi et al., 2020).
d) Oxidation of Arylboronic Acids: Generation of superoxide radical anion results in the oxidation of arylboronic acids to phenols (Zou et al., 2012). This reaction has been achieved by the following materials: a) three new benzoxazole-linked COFs, (LZU-190) obtained in 2018 (Wei et al., 2018), b) an imine-linked COF obtained in 2019 through the self-condensation of an aldehyde and amine containing tetratopic building block, (Wojaczyńska and Wojaczyński, 2010; Lu et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2020), c) three imine-based undecorated COFs with different architectures and morphologies (Huang et al., 2017).
e) Oxidative Coupling: Firstly, the coupling imine product from primary amines was obtained using Por-sp2c-COF (porphyrin-containing COF) as photocatalyst combined with TEMPO as co-catalyst and oxygen as the final oxidant (Chen et al., 2019a; Chen et al., 2019b; Liu et al., 2020a; López-Magano et al., 2020b). Also, benzylamine was oxidized using TFPT-BMTH (hydrazone-based COF) and water as solvent. It should be highlighted that the use of more stable materials is needed for this reaction, since amines are employed as reagents, (Liu et al., 2020b), which due to their nucleophilicity can act against the structural integrity of the material (Luis-Barrerra et al., 2019).
f) Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling (CDC): In 2016, a CDC reaction between different nucleophiles (e.g., nitro-derivatives and ketones) and N-aryl-tetrahydroisoquinolines (THIQs) was achieved under TFB-COF (an acylhydrazone-based COF) photocatalysis (Liu et al., 2017). In addition, an imine-based COF containing triazine units, COF-JLU5, was used for the same CDC reaction, allowing a larger scope of THIQs and nucleophiles (phosphite and malonates) (Zhi et al., 2017). Also, two bidimensional imine-based COFs containing the photoactive units triphenylamine and tetraphenylethylene were employed for CDC reaction (Kang et al., 2020).
FIGURE 1
Two different mechanism for oxidation reaction using organic materials (left) and main organic erobic oxidations of organic substrates (right).
Photocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction
Formation of oxygen molecule from oxidation of water is a very challenging goal due to a large thermodynamic penalty and the complexity of reaction kinetics involved in the four-electron oxidation process. Generally, the commonly reported mechanism for the OER process implies oxidation of M-OH2 starting precursors forming a high-valent Metal oxo or Metal-hydroxo species, depending on the nature of metal center. Then O-O bond formation results from a bimetallic MO(H)···(H)OM association, or from monometallic MO(H)···OH2 reactivity. Further oxidation of peroxo species results of O2 generation. Overall, two consecutive bielectronic oxidative steeps should occur simultaneously to O-O bond formation. Therefore, redox-active metal centers are generally required to mediate on these multistep pathways (Mandal et al., 2017).
Some examples of Covalent Organic Frameworks decorated with Ni (II), Fe(II), (Feng et al., 2020), Co(II) (Aiyappa et al., 2016; Jia et al., 2015), Ni3N (Nandi et al., 2016) or Nickel, Iron or Cobalt oxide nanoparticles (Mullangi et al., 2016) have been reported to act as OER electrocatalysts. Taking a step further, owing the tunable electronic properties of semiconductor COFs and CTFs, photocatalytic OER has been achieved as the result of synergy between photoactive material and catalytic metallic sites. The role of organic material generally consists on harvesting light, which enhances the redox reactivity of catalytic sites because of the efficient charge separation from light absorption. Therefore, water oxidation is possible using mild oxidizing agents, such as Ag+, which is typically used as final oxidizing reagent, only when light irradiation occurs (see Figure 2). Some examples of this kind of designs have been recently reported.
FIGURE 2
Schematic representation of pathway commonly claimed for photocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction.
An outstanding example is a imine-based bipyridine containing COF that coordinates Co(II) centers. The photogenerated charge separation is produced by light absorption of the COF. The photogenerated electrons are captured by the Ag+ to produce Ag NPs, while the photogenerated holes result in generation of high valent cobalt species, which ultimately oxidizes the adsorbed H2O molecule to evolve oxygen (Chen et al., 2020).
Photocatalytic transformations require materials design that should allow to optimize the combination of light harvesting, exciton migration, electron transfer, charge separation and charge transport. According to a recent report, (Jin et al., 2019), this balance is better achieved by laminar fully π conjugated sp2 carbon-extended covalent organic frameworks, such as those based on cyano vinyldene groups, which can be used dispersed in water containing AgNO3 as final reducing agent and Co(NO3)2 as co-catalyst. Following a similar strategy, laminar COFs were obtained through condensation of arylmethyl carbon atoms in 3,5-dicyano-2,4,6-trimethylpyridine and linear/trigonal aldehyde monomers, generating trans-disubstituted C=C linkages. The corresponding Csp2 jointed pyridinyl crystalline honeycomb-like frameworks are structurally related to graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), which also has been reported as a photocatalysts (Wen et al., 2017). Interestingly, when loaded with Co(NO3)2, these materials exhibited visible-light activity for OER with oxygen evolution rates comparable to that of bulk g-C3N4 (Bi et al., 2019).
CTFs are materials closely related to C3N4, which have been applied for photocatalytic water splitting recently because of their semiconductive properties and their adjustable band gap, that can even be modulated by the method of choice for material’s synthesis (Kong et al., 2019). Irreversible nature of CTF formation is responsible for the amorphous nature of materials obtained. However, in many cases, the lack of crystallinity is not a significant drawback for the photocatalytic activity for OER. Simple CTFs with different chain lengths, containing variable quantity of benzyl units in the backbone were reported as good photocatalysts for OER when loaded with Co(NO3)2 (Lan et al., 2018) or with ruthenium oxide (Xie et al., 2018; Bi et al., 2015). Intriguingly, while the common understanding of OER is usually associated to the role of metal centers as mediators in electron transfer steeps coupled to O-O bond formation, oxygen evolution has been reported using CTF-0 material without any co-catalyst in the presence of Ag+ as the electron scavenger (Bi et al., 2015; Wen et al., 2017; Lan et al., 2018; Xie et al., 2018; Bi et al., 2019; Jin et al., 2019; Kong et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020). Further mechanistic insights of this surprising process are expected.
Future Perspectives and Final Remarks
Photoactivation of oxygen molecule mediated by Covalent Organic Frameworks, to achieve oxidation of organic substrates, is a field of research that achieved some degree of maturity, being reported the most common photocatalytic transformations. However, more complex systems, such as synthesis of asymmetric products, or cooperative multicomponent catalysis, still remain unexplored. Future developments on the photocatalytic use of COFs and Conjugated Organic Materials will require a fine tuning of molecular architectures with semiconducting properties. Control on linkages, building blocks, and end groups can serve to predesign materials able to facilitate charge separation and charge-carrier transport and preventing the charge recombination of photoexcited states.
The reticular chemistry scientific community has a clear bias toward the detailed structural elucidation and physical characterization. Thus, materials with poor crystallinities and scarce porosities are often discarded despite the photocatalytic functions that can be observed for amorphous materials. It is commonly assumed that ordered channels in crystalline materials with high surface areas facilitate mass transport. However, microporosity do not assure accessibility of reactants because diffusion into the internal regions of bulk porous materials is more difficult when the size particle is increased. In fact, when activity is related to single catalytic sites, results are improved by reducing the particle size, even if it implies a decrease on crystallinity and measured porosity (Zou et al., 2012; Aiyappa et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017; Zhi et al., 2017; Wei et al., 2018; Jiménez-Almarza et al., 2019; Luis-Barrerra et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020b; Feng et al., 2020; Kang et al., 2020; Shi et al., 2020). These observations indicate that catalytic processes generally occur in the pores that are closer to the particle surface. To this respect, it is significant that CTFs, which commonly show poor crystallinities and low surface areas, have been reported for several photocatalytic oxidations. Only when photoactivity is related with extended conjugation, and it is compromised by structural disorder, crystallinity has a positive impact on catalytic results (Jia et al., 2015; Mullangi et al., 2016; Nandi et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017). Therefore, although structural integrity is interesting for some applications of COFs, research on photocatalytic COFs should concentrate on the main parameters related on the activity, which are not necessarily crystallinity and porosity.
The two main mechanistic possibilities of aerobic photooxidation of organic molecules are relatively well stablished via single oxygen or superoxide radical anion. The same material can usually perform through both mechanisms, although, one is generally the predominant for each specific material. Thus, when mechanistic studies are performed, the question that should be addressed is about what is the major process rather than just collect evidences of intermediates, which could be minor. Consequently, spectroscopic detection (for instance, through EPR) of transient species should be complemented with other experiments that can help to determine the specific contribution (electron transfer vs. energy transfer) of such intermediate to the overall catalytic outcome. A feasible way to address this issue is the use of specific scavengers that can selectively inhibit one or another pathway.
Uses of COFs in photocatalytic water oxidation have started to be explored very recently. However, owing the complexity of this process, little is known on the pathways followed for photocatalytic OER mediated by organic materials. The majority of the cases reported in literature consist on metal centered OER, while the role of the organic material is light harvesting. However, activities found for a metal-free system suggest that mechanistic landscape could be widened in future developments.
Overall, the state of the art shown in this overview confirms that photocatalytic applications of COFs for oxidation processes has a great growing potential. Modern chemistry challenges such as artificial photosynthesis, energy conversion, design of environmentally benign processes or the production of high added value products, should be further addressed by means of the design of new photocatalytic organic materials.
Statements
Author contributions
JA and RM-B performed the literature research, conceived the review topic and wrote the manuscript.
Funding
Financial support was provided by the European Research Council (ERC-CoG, contract number: 647550), Spanish Government (PID 2019-110637RB-I00 and RTI 2018-095038-B-I00), “Comunidad de Madrid” and European Structural Funds (S2018/NMT-4367).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with the authors RM-B, JA.
References
1
AiyappaH. B.ThoteJ.ShindeD. B.BanerjeeR.KurungotS. (2016). Cobalt-Modified Covalent Organic Framework as a Robust Water Oxidation Electrocatalyst. Chem. Mater.28 (12), 4375–4379. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01370
2
BiJ.FangW.LiL.WangJ.LiangS.HeY.et al (2015). Covalent Triazine-Based Frameworks as Visible Light Photocatalysts for the Splitting of Water. Macromol. Rapid Commun.36, 1799–1805. 10.1002/marc.201500270
3
BiS.YangC.ZhangW.XuJ.LiuL.WuD.et al (2019). Two-dimensional Semiconducting Covalent Organic Frameworks via Condensation at Arylmethyl Carbon Atoms. Nat. Commun.10, 2467. 10.1038/s41467-019-10504-6
4
BonesiS. M.ManetI.FrecceroM.FagnoniM.AlbiniA. (2006). Photosensitized Oxidation of Sulfides: Discriminating between the Singlet-Oxygen Mechanism and Electron Transfer Involving Superoxide Anion or Molecular Oxygen. Chem. Eur. J.12, 4844–4857. 10.1002/chem.200501144
5
ChenJ.TaoX.LiC.MaY.TaoL.ZhengD.et al (2020). Synthesis of Bipyridine-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks for Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Water Oxidation. Appl. Catal. B: Environ.262, 118271. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118271
6
ChenP.GuoZ.LiuX.LvH.CheY.BaiR.et al (2019). A Visible-Light-Responsive Metal-Organic Framework for Highly Efficient and Selective Photocatalytic Oxidation of Amines and Reduction of Nitroaromatics. J. Mater. Chem. A.7, 27074–27080. 10.1039/C9TA10723A
7
ChenR.ShiJ. L.MaY.LinG.LangX.WangC. (2019). Designed Synthesis of a 2D Porphyrin‐Based Sp 2 Carbon‐Conjugated Covalent Organic Framework for Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 6430–6434. 10.1002/anie.201902543
8
Dad’ováJ.SvobodováE.SikorskiM.KönigB.CibulkaR. (2012). Photooxidation of Sulfides to Sulfoxides Mediated by Tetra-O-Acetylriboflavin and Visible Light. ChemCatChem.4, 620–623. 10.1002/cctc.201100372
9
DingS.-Y.WangW. (2013). Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs): From Design to Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.42, 548–568. 10.1039/C2CS35072F
10
FangQ.WangJ.GuS.KasparR. B.ZhuangZ.ZhengJ.et al (2015). 3D Porous Crystalline Polyimide Covalent Organic Frameworks for Drug Delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 8352–8355. 10.1021/jacs.5b04147
11
FengX.GaoZ.XiaoL.LaiZ.LuoF. (2020). A Ni/Fe Complex Incorporated into a Covalent Organic Framework as a Single-Site Heterogeneous Catalyst for Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Inorg. Chem. Front.7, 3925–3931. 10.1039/D0QI00620C
12
GuoZ.LiuB.ZhangQ.DengW.WangY.YangY. (2014). Recent Advances in Heterogeneous Selective Oxidation Catalysis for Sustainable Chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev.43, 3480–3524. 10.1039/C3CS60282F
13
HuangW.MaB. C.LuH.LiR.WangL.LandfesterK.et al (2017). Visible-Light-Promoted Selective Oxidation of Alcohols Using a Covalent Triazine Framework. ACS Catal.7, 5438–5442. 10.1021/acscatal.7b01719
14
JiaH.SunZ.JiangD.DuP. (2015). Covalent Cobalt Porphyrin Framework on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes for Efficient Water Oxidation at Low Overpotential. Chem. Mater.27 (13), 4586–4593. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00882
15
Jiménez-AlmarzaA.López-MaganoA.MarzoL.CabreraS.Mas-BallestéR.AlemánJ. (2019). Imine-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks as Photocatalysts for Metal Free Oxidation Processes under Visible Light Conditions. ChemCatChem11, 4916. 10.1002/cctc.201901061
16
JinE.LanZ.JiangQ.GengK.LiG.WangX.et al (2019). 2D Sp2 Carbon-Conjugated Covalent Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Water. Chem5, 1632–1647. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.015
17
KangX.WuX.HanX.YuanC.LiuY.CuiY. (2020). Rational Synthesis of Interpenetrated 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Photocatalysis. Chem. Sci.11, 1494–1502. 10.1039/C9SC04882K
18
KongD.HanX.XieJ.RuanQ.WindleC. D.GadipelliS.et al (2019). Tunable Covalent Triazine-Based Frameworks (CTF-0) for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen and Oxygen Generation from Water Splitting. ACS Catal.9, 7697–7707. 10.1021/acscatal.9b02195
19
LanZ.-A.FangY.ZhangY.WangX. (2018). Photocatalytic Oxygen Evolution from Functional Triazine-Based Polymers with Tunable Band Structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.57, 470–474. 10.1002/anie.201711155
20
LiuL.ZhangB.TanX.TanD.ChengX.HanB.et al (2020). Improved Photocatalytic Performance of Covalent Organic Frameworks by Nanostructure Construction. Chem. Commun.56, 4567–4570. 10.1039/D0CC00761G
21
LiuW.SuQ.JuP.GuoB.ZhouH.LiG.et al (2017). A Hydrazone-Based Covalent Organic Framework as an Efficient and Reusable Photocatalyst for the Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reaction ofN-Aryltetrahydroisoquinolines. ChemSusChem10, 664–669. 10.1002/cssc.201601702
22
LiuZ.SuQ.JuP.LiX.LiG.WuQ.et al (2020). A Hydrophilic Covalent Organic Framework for Photocatalytic Oxidation of Benzylamine in Water. Chem. Commun.56, 766–769. 10.1039/C9CC07661A
23
López-MaganoA.Jiménez-AlmarzaA.AlemánJ.Mas-BallestéR. (2020). Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) Applied to Photocatalytic Organic Transformations. Catalysts10, 720. 10.3390/catal10070720
24
López-MaganoA.Platero-PratsA. E.CabreraS.Mas-BallestéR.AlemánJ. (2020). Incorporation of Photocatalytic Pt(II) Complexes into Imine-Based Layered Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) through Monomer Truncation Strategy. Appl. Catal. B: Environ.272, 119027. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119027
25
LuG.HuangX.LiY.ZhaoG.PangG.WangG. (2020). Covalently Integrated Core-Shell MOF@COF Hybrids as Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalysts for Selective Oxidation of Alcohols. J. Energ. Chem.43, 8–15. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.07.014
26
LuG.HuangX.WuZ.LiY.XingL.GaoH.et al (2019). Construction of Covalently Integrated Core-Shell TiO2 Nanobelts@COF Hybrids for Highly Selective Oxidation of Alcohols under Visible Light. Appl. Surf. Sci.493, 551–560. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.265
27
Luis-BarrerraJ.CanoR.Imani-ShakibaeiG.Heras-DomingoJ.Pérez-CarvajalJ.ImazI.et al (2019). Switching Acidic and Basic Catalysis through Supramolecular Functionalization in a Porous 3D Covalent Imine-Based Material. Catal. Sci. Technol.9, 6007–6014. 10.1039/C9CY01527B
28
MaH.LiuB.LiB.ZhangL.LiY.-G.TanH.-Q.et al (2016). Cationic Covalent Organic Frameworks: A Simple Platform of Anionic Exchange for Porosity Tuning and Proton Conduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 5897–5903. 10.1021/jacs.5b13490
29
MandalA. K.MahmoodJ.BaekJ.-B. (2017). Two-Dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks for Optoelectronics and Energy Storage. ChemNanoMat3, 373–391. 10.1002/cnma.201700048
30
MengY.LuoY.ShiJ. L.DingH.LangX.ChenW.et al (2020). 2D and 3D Porphyrinic Covalent Organic Frameworks: The Influence of Dimensionality on Functionality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59, 3624–3629. 10.1002/anie.201913091
31
MullangiD.DhavaleV.ShaliniS.NandiS.CollinsS.WooT.et al (2016). Low-Overpotential Electrocatalytic Water Splitting with Noble-Metal-Free Nanoparticles Supported in a sp3N-Rich Flexible COF. Adv. Energ. Mater.6, 1600110. 10.1002/aenm.201600110
32
NandiS.SinghS. K.MullangiD.IllathvalappilR.GeorgeL.VinodC. P.et al (2016). Low Band Gap Benzimidazole COF Supported Ni3N as Highly Active OER Catalyst. Adv. Energ. Mater.6, 1601189. 10.1002/aenm.201601189
33
SamantaP.DesaiA. V.LetS.GhoshS. K. (2019). Advanced Porous Materials for Sensing, Capture and Detoxification of Organic Pollutants toward Water Remediation. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng.7, 7456–7478. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00155
34
ShawM. H.TwiltonJ.MacMillanD. W. C. (2016). Photoredox Catalysis in Organic Chemistry. J. Org. Chem.81, 6898–6926. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01449
35
ShiJ. L.ChenR.HaoH.WangC.LangX. (2020). 2D Sp 2 Carbon‐Conjugated Porphyrin Covalent Organic Framework for Cooperative Photocatalysis with TEMPO. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59, 9088–9093. 10.1002/anie.202000723
36
SongJ.WeiC.HuangZ.-F.LiuC.ZengL.WangX.et al (2020). A Review on Fundamentals for Designing Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev.49, 2196–2214. 10.1039/C9CS00607A
37
WangG.-B.LiS.YanC.-X.ZhuF.-C.LinQ.-Q.XieK.-H.et al (2020). Covalent Organic Frameworks: Emerging High-Performance Platforms for Efficient Photocatalytic Applications. J. Mater. Chem. A.8, 6957–6983. 10.1039/D0TA00556H
38
WeiP.-F.QiM.-Z.WangZ.-P.DingS.-Y.YuW.LiuQ.et al (2018). Benzoxazole-Linked Ultrastable Covalent Organic Frameworks for Photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 4623–4631. 10.1021/jacs.8b00571
39
WenJ.XieJ.ChenX.LiX. (2017). A Review on G-C 3 N 4 -based Photocatalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci.391, 72–123. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.030
40
WojaczyńskaE.WojaczyńskiJ. (2010). Enantioselective Synthesis of Sulfoxides: 2000-2009. Chem. Rev.110, 4303–4356. 10.1021/cr900147h
41
XieJ.ShevlinS. A.RuanQ.MonizS. J. A.LiuY.LiuX.et al (2018). Efficient Visible Light-Driven Water Oxidation and Proton Reduction by an Ordered Covalent Triazine-Based Framework. Energy Environ. Sci.11, 1617–1624. 10.1039/c7ee02981k
42
YanX.LiuH.LiY.ChenW.ZhangT.ZhaoZ.et al (2019). Ultrastable Covalent Organic Frameworks via Self-Polycondensation of an A2B2 Monomer for Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. Macromolecules52, 7977–7983. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b01600
43
ZhiY.LiZ.FengX.XiaH.ZhangY.ShiZ.et al (2017). Covalent Organic Frameworks as Metal-free Heterogeneous Photocatalysts for Organic Transformations. J. Mater. Chem. A.5, 22933–22938. 10.1039/C7TA07691F
44
ZhuL.ZhangY.-B. (2017). Crystallization of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage Applications. Molecules22, 1149. 10.3390/molecules22071149
45
ZouY.-Q.ChenJ.-R.LiuX.-P.LuL.-Q.DavisR. L.JørgensenK. A.et al (2012). Highly Efficient Aerobic Oxidative Hydroxylation of Arylboronic Acids: Photoredox Catalysis Using Visible Light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 784–788. 10.1002/anie.201107028
Summary
Keywords
covalent organic frameworks, photocatalysis, synthesis, oxidation, oxygen evolution reaction
Citation
Alemán J and Mas-Ballesté R (2021) Photocatalytic Oxidation Reactions Mediated by Covalent Organic Frameworks and Related Extended Organic Materials. Front. Chem. 9:708312. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.708312
Received
11 May 2021
Accepted
08 June 2021
Published
24 June 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Xavier Sala, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
Reviewed by
Pierluca Galloni, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
Roc Mathueu, Stanford University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Alemán and Mas-Ballesté.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: José Alemán, jose.aleman@uam.es; Rubén Mas-Ballesté, ruben.mas@uam.es
This article was submitted to Catalysis and Photocatalysis, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.