BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Sec. Health Psychology
Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571873
Perceived Stress and Daily Well-Being During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Moderating Role of Age
- 1Department of Special Education and Counselling, Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong
- 2Centre for Psychosocial Health, Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong
- 3Integrated Centre for Wellbeing (I-WELL), Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong
Objectives: Older adults are considered one of the most vulnerable groups to COVID-19. However, previous studies on emotion and aging have found that older adults report better wellbeing than younger adults in global surveys and daily reports. To better understand older adults’ wellbeing during the COVID-19 outbreak, we examined age differences in daily affective experiences in this study.
Methods: Two hundred and thirty-one participants from mainland China aged 18 to 85 were recruited to participate in the 14-day daily diary study, after a pretest. Their trait affect and demographic information were measured in the pretest. Their daily affect and stress levels were measured in the daily assessments.
Results: I found that older adults reported lower perceived stress related to COVID-19 in daily life, compared to younger adults. The negative relationship between daily perceived stress and high arousal positive affect and the positive relationship between daily perceived stress and high arousal negative affect was weaker in older than younger adults.
Discussion: These results provide initial evidence of daily affective wellbeing across different age groups in adulthood during the COVID-19 outbreak. Such information is important for developing interventions to promote better wellbeing during the COVID-19 outbreak.
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic started in December 2019 and quickly spread to more than 215 countries by mid-April 2020. Due to its serious effects on human health, it can also damage mental health by increasing levels of anxiety, stress, and worry among health professionals, and the general public (Qiu et al., 2020). Although older adults are considered one of the most vulnerable groups to COVID-19 (Remuzzi and Remuzzi, 2020), some global surveys found that older adults reported less depression and anxiety (Bruine de Bruin, 2020; Losada-Baltar et al., 2020). However, few studies so far have examined whether the daily wellbeing of older adults was indeed better than their younger counterparts. To this end, I examined the daily perceived stress of Chinese people across different age groups in adulthood during the COVID-19 outbreak. In addition, I examined age differences in the relationship between daily perceived stress and daily wellbeing.
In the literature on aging and emotion, older adults generally report a higher level of positive affect (e.g., happiness, enthusiastic, and calm) and a lower level of negative affect (e.g., anxiety, sadness, and stress) than younger adults in global surveys and daily diary studies (Gross et al., 1997; Carstensen et al., 2000). These results have been explained by socioemotional selectivity theory (SST) (Carstensen et al., 2003). SST postulates that older adults prioritize emotionally meaningful goals (e.g., experience positive emotions) over knowledge goals (e.g., learn new knowledge) more than younger adults, because they view future time as more limited. Prioritizing emotionally meaningful goals, older adults are more motivated to regulate their emotions toward a positive end (Fung and Carstensen, 2006). Therefore, they report better wellbeing in general even after experiencing negative affect. In a laboratory experiment, Scott et al. (2017) found no age difference in regulating momentary negative stressors (0–10 min), but older adults better regulated stressors after being exposed to stressors for 10 min to 2.5 h. The COVID-19 outbreak is a situation that induces tremendous psychological distress (Qiu et al., 2020). Although older adults reported better mental health in one-off surveys (Bruine de Bruin, 2020; Yang et al., 2020), it is unknown whether older adults can still regulate their emotions better than younger adults in real-time daily life. Therefore, I examined age differences in daily perceived stress and its relationship with daily wellbeing using a 14-day daily diary study in a lifespan sample.
Based on the two-dimensional valence-arousal model (Russell, 1980), I examined people’s daily affective experiences during the COVID-19 outbreak using a daily diary method by which participants’ affective experiences were measured on a daily basis. In particular, I focused on daily stress, and daily experiences of the positive affect (POS), high arousal positive affect (HAP), low arousal positive affect (LAP), negative affect (NEG), high arousal negative affect (HAN), and low arousal negative affect (LAN). Based on SST (Carstensen et al., 2003), I predicted that older adults would experience a lower level of perceived stress related to COVID-19 (H1). In addition, I predicted that the relationship between daily perceived stress and daily wellbeing (indexed by higher levels of POS, HAP, and LAP, and lower levels of NEG, HAN, and LAN) would be weaker in older than younger adults.
Materials and Methods
Two hundred and thirty-one Chinese participants aged 18 to 85 (Mage = 44.74 years, SDage = 17.54 years; 69% women; 70% had a college degree; 41% had a job; 17% had a religion) participated in the study in February 2020. Thirty-three percent of the sample were aged between 18 to 35 years, 51.5% were aged between 36–60 years, and 15% were aged between 61 years and above. They were recruited through mass mailing through a university email system. All participants were born and raised in China, and lived in mainland China during the 14-day daily diary period. They came from 23 of the 32 provinces, cities, and autonomous regions in mainland China. Two participants came from Hubei province. We included their data in the analysis because the results did not change when deleting their data. However, four participants were excluded from the data analysis due to missing data in their daily diaries. Among the remaining 227 participants, 192 completed 14 daily questionnaires (Range = 1–14 times; Massessment = 13.26, SD = 2.66). One of them was identified as a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 case during the questionnaire period, but the deletion of the data did not change the pattern of the results. Descriptive information about the sample is presented in Table 1.
The study was conducted during the peak period of COVID-19 spread in China. All questionnaires were completed online using the Wenjuan.com online survey system. After an introductory e-mail and a briefing session via WeChat, the participants were asked to complete an online survey on their demographic information. The daily diary period started from the second day after the first online survey and lasted 14 consecutive days. A WeChat message containing the URL link to the online questionnaire was sent to the participants around 8 pm each day to remind them to complete the daily questionnaire. They received another reminder via WeChat if they had not completed the questionnaire by 9 am the next morning. All participants received HK$200 (approximately US$25) after completing the study. This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Education University of Hong Kong.
Actual trait affect
We used the Affect Valuation Index (AVI; Tsai et al., 2006) to measure their actual trait affect. The participants were asked to indicate how often they actually experienced each affective state in a typical week on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 “never” to 5 “always.” Based on the two-dimensional valence-arousal model, HAP was measured by the aggregate score of “enthusiastic,” “excited,” and “elated” (Cronbach’s α = 0.68); LAP was measured by the aggregate score of “calm,” “relaxed,” “peaceful,” and “serene” (Cronbach’s α = 0.76); HAN was measured by the aggregate score of “fear,” “hostile,” and “nervous” (Cronbach’s α = 0.71); and LAN was measured by the aggregate score of “dull,” “sleepy,” and “sluggish” (Cronbach’s α = 0.71).
The participants were asked to indicate their gender (0 = male, 1 = female), partner status (0 = without partner, 1 = with partner), education (0 = did not finish college, 1 = finished college), religion (0 = no religion, 1 = has a religion), and overall subjective health (1 = very poor to 6 = perfect).
Daily actual affect
The daily version of the AVI (Tsai et al., 2006) was used to assess daily actual affect. The participants were asked to indicate the intensity with which they actually experienced each affective state on that day on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 “not at all” to 5 “extremely.” In particular, HAP was measured by “enthusiastic” (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) = 53%); LAP was measured by “calm” (ICC = 44%); HAN was measured by “anxious” (ICC = 52%); LAN was measured by “dull” (ICC = 55%); positive affect was measured by “happy” (ICC = 51%); and negative affect was measured by “sad” (ICC = 49%).
Perceived stress related to COVID-19
The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983) was adapted to measure the participants’ daily perceived stress related to COVID-19. “In the last month” in the original version was changed to “today” to measure daily stress. Three items for unexpected life changes were used in the short daily questionnaire, including “I was upset because of COVID-19 today,” “I felt that I was unable to control the important things in my life because of COVID-19 today,” and “Despite COVID-19, I felt confident about my ability to handle my personal problems.” The participants were asked to indicate how often they agreed with the statement, from 1 “never” to 5 “always” (ICC = 67%, between-person reliability estimate = 0.71; within-person reliability estimate = 0.68; Cranford et al., 2006).
The participants were asked to rate their daily subjective health on a scale from 1 “very poor” to 6 “perfect.”
Data Analysis and Results
Age differences in perceived daily stress during the COVID-19 outbreak were first examined. Then whether there were age differences in the relationship between daily stress and daily affective experiences were determined. These questions were addressed using Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM; Raudenbush, 2004). The results were controlled for daily subjective health, the number of days of assessment, marital status, socioeconomic status, education, and religion because these variables were found to be associated with daily affect and stress. Marital status, religion, and education were included in the model as bivariate variables, while age, daily subjective health, and socioeconomic status were centered on the grand mean. HLM models of the two research questions are reported below.
HLM Model Equations
Age Differences in Daily Perceived Stress
Below are the model equations addressing this question.
Perceived stress = B0 + B1∗(Day) + B2∗(daily health) + r
B0 = G00 + G01∗(age) + G02∗(marital status) + G03∗(socioeconomic status) + G04∗ (education) + G05∗(religion) + u0
B1 = G10 + u1
B2 = G20 + u2
The Relationship Between Daily Affective Experiences and Perceived Stress
Affective experiences = B0 + B1∗(day) + B2∗(daily health) + B3∗(daily perceived stress) + r
B0 = G00 + G01∗(gender) + G02∗(age) + G03∗(marital status) + G04∗(socioeconomic status) + G05∗(education) + G06∗(religion) + u0
B1 = G10 + u1
B2 = G20 + u2
B3 = G30 + u3
Age Differences in Daily Perceived Stress
With perceived stress as the dependent variable, the variance components (VC) suggested that there was significant variance in the intercept to be explained across individuals (χ2 = 1020.62, p < 0.001). Age was associated with daily lesser perceived stress (estimate = −0.006, SE = 0.003, p < 0.05). Ordinal day was associated with less positive affect, (estimate = −0.010, SE = 0.003, p < 0.01), suggesting that participants reported less stress in the later days of the daily diary period. Detailed results are reported in Table 2.
Table 2. Multilevel hierarchical linear analysis testing the age differences in daily perceived stress.
The Relationship Between Daily Affective Experiences and Perceived Stress
Age differences in the relationship between perceived stress and daily affective experiences were then examined. Perceived stress was negatively associated with daily positive affect (estimate = −0.282, SE = 0.033 p < 0.001), HAP (estimate = −0.153, SE = 0.035, p < 0.001), and LAP (estimate = −0.078, SE = 0.034, p < 0.05); and was positively associated with daily negative affect (estimate = 0.247, SE = 0.029, p < 0.001), HAN (estimate = 0.431, SE = 0.032, p < 0.001), and LAN (estimate = 0.302, SE = 0.033, p < 0.001). The relationship between stress and HAP was moderated by age so that the negative association was weaker in older than younger adults (estimate = 0.005, SE = 0.002, p < 0.05). The relationship between stress and HAN was also weaker in older than younger adults (estimate = −0.005, SE = 0.002, p < 0.05). Age did not moderate the relationships between stress and other daily affective states. Detailed results are reported in Table 3.
Table 3. Multilevel hierarchical linear analysis testing the age differences in the relationship between perceived stress and daily affective experiences.
Discussion and Conclusion
Using a 14-day daily diary study, we examined people’s daily affective experiences across different age groups in adulthood during home quarantine when COVID-19 broke out in mainland China. We found that older adults reported a lower level of perceived stress related to COVID-19 than younger adults. In addition, we found that the negative association between daily perceived stress and daily high arousal positive affect was weaker in older than younger adults; and that the positive relationship between daily perceived health and daily high arousal negative affect was also weaker in older than younger adults.
Consistent with the previous findings on age differences in perceived stress after stress induction (Scott et al., 2017), we found that older adults reported a lower level of daily perceived stress than younger adults during the COVID-19 outbreak. These findings could be explained by SST that found that older adults are more motivated to regulate emotion than younger adults (Carstensen et al., 2003). In addition, these results are consistent with a recent one-off surveys on age differences in loneliness during home quarantine in Spain (Losada-Baltar et al., 2020) and China (Qiu et al., 2020). These findings, taken together, may suggest that older adults indeed perceived less stress during the outbreak of COVID-19.
We only found significant age differences in the relationship between daily stress and high arousal affect, regardless of valence. Such findings may be attributable to the fact that stress is a high arousal affective state. Therefore, the feeling of stress might be more relevant to high arousal positive and negative affect than the low arousal ones. It may also be possible that individuals regardless of age prefer low arousal affect states over high arousal affect states, when they see future time as increasingly limited (Jiang et al., 2016). The situation of COVID-19 induces a more limited future time perspective, because it damages both mental and physical health (Yang et al., 2020). Low arousal affective states are more relevant to the situation of COVID-19 for both younger and older adults. Therefore, the age differences were only observed in high arousal affective states. Future studies should clarify the mechanism of the age differences in the relationship between daily stress and different types of daily affective states. Although older adults are considered as one of the most vulnerable groups during COVID-19, the findings of this study, together with the previous findings, may suggest that older adults indeed have a better ability to cope with the psychological distress caused by COVID-19. However, more support and effort should be given to protect their physical health (Nikolich-Zugich et al., 2020).
Despite its interesting results, the study also has limitations. First, although we included multiple assessment points, this study was based on a correlational design. Thus, we were not able to examine the mechanism underlying the relationship. Second, the sample used may not be representative of the population of mainland China. In particular, the education level in this sample was higher than that of the general population. Although demographic information, such as education level, marital status, religion, and socioeconomic status, was controlled for in data analysis, a larger sample size is needed to validate findings of this initial study on daily affective experiences during the COVID-19 outbreak in future studies. Third and as aforementioned, we could not explain the non-significant interactions between age and fate control on daily affective experiences. Future studies should clarify this issue.
In this 14-day daily diary study, we found that older adults reported a lower level of perceived stress related to COVID-19 than younger adults. The negative relationship between perceived stress and a high arousal positive affective state, and the positive relationship between perceived stress and a high arousal negative affective state were weaker in older than younger adults. These results provide initial evidence of the daily affective wellbeing of adults during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. These findings provide initial evidence on daily affect during home quarantine of individuals across different age groups in adulthood. Such information may be important for preparing different mental health services for people in different age groups.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be available upon sending request to the corresponding author, without undue reservation.
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Education University of Hong Kong. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
The author contributes to theoretical framework, data analysis, and manuscript writing of the manuscript.
The work described in this paper was supported by the Early Career Scheme (Ref. No. 28607119) funded by the Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong, China and a grant of internal research grant from the Education University of Hong Kong to DJ.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Bruine de Bruin, W. (2020). Age differences in COVID-19 risk perceptions and mental health:Evidence from a national US survey conducted in March 2020. J. Gerontol. Ser B 29:gbaa074. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa074
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., and Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional Selectivity Theory and the Regulation of Emotion in the Second Half of Life 1. Motivat. Emot. 27, 103–124.
Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U., and Nesselroade, J. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 79:644. doi: 10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1684
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A Global Measure of Perceived Stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24, 385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404
Cranford, J. A., Shrout, P. E., Iida, M., Rafaeli, E., Yip, T., and Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32, 917–929. doi: 10.1177/0146167206287721
Fung, H. H., and Carstensen, L. L. (2006). Goals Change When Life’s Fragility is Primed: Lessons Learned From Older Adults, the September 11 Attacks and Sars. Soc. Cogn. 24, 248–278. doi: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.248
Gross, J. J., Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Tsai, J., Götestam Skorpen, C., and Hsu, A. Y. C. (1997). Emotion and aging: experience, expression, and control. Psychol. Aging 12, 590. doi: 10.1037/0882-7922.214.171.1240
Jiang, D., Fung, H. H., Sims, T., Tsai, J. L., and Zhang, F. (2016). Limited time perspective increases the value of calm. Emotion 16:52. doi: 10.1037/emo0000094
Losada-Baltar, A., Jiménez-Gonzalo, L., Gallego-Alberto, L., Pedroso-Chaparro, M., del, S., Fernandes-Pires, J., et al. (2020). We’re staying at home”. Association of self-perceptions of aging, personal and family resources and loneliness with psychological distress during the lock-down period of COVID-19. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 13:gbaa048. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa048
Nikolich-Zugich, J., Knox, K. S., Rios, C. T., Natt, B., Bhattacharya, D., and Fain, M. J. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in older adults: what we may expect regarding pathogenesis, immune responses, and outcomes. Geroscience 42, 505–514. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00186-0
Qiu, J., Shen, B., Zhao, M., Wang, Z., Xie, B., and Xu, Y. (2020). A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gener. Psych. 33:e100213. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213
Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling∗. Scientific Software International.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39:1161. doi: 10.1037/h0077714
Scott, S. B., Ram, N., Smyth, J. M., Almeida, D. M., and Sliwinski, M. J. (2017). Age differences in negative emotional responses to daily stressors depend on time since event. Devel. Psychol. 53:177. doi: 10.1037/dev0000257
Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., and Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 90:288. doi: 10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1998
Remuzzi, A., and Remuzzi, G. (2020). COVID-19 and Italy: what next? Lancet. 395, 1225–1228. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30627-9
Yang, Y., Li, W., Zhang, Q., Zhang, L., Cheung, T., and Xiang, Y.-T. (2020). Mental health services for older adults in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psych. 7:e19. doi: 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30079-1
Keywords: affective experiences, perceived stress, age, daily diary, COVID-19
Citation: Jiang D (2020) Perceived Stress and Daily Well-Being During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Moderating Role of Age. Front. Psychol. 11:571873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571873
Received: 12 June 2020; Accepted: 10 September 2020;
Published: 12 November 2020.
Edited by:Daniel Bressington, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
Reviewed by:Joana Carvalho, University of Porto, Portugal
Shufei Yin, Hubei University, China
Copyright © 2020 Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Da Jiang, firstname.lastname@example.org