Abstract
This study investigated cross-cultural differences in individual pride and collective pride between Chinese and Americans using data from text corpora. We found higher absolute frequencies of pride items in the American corpus than in the Chinese corpus. Cross-cultural differences were found for relative frequencies of different types of pride, and some of them depended on the genre of the text corpora. For both blogs and news genres, Americans showed higher frequencies of individual pride items and lower frequencies of relational pride items than did their Chinese counterparts. Cross-cultural differences in national pride, however, depended on the genre: Chinese news genre included more national pride items than its American counterpart, but the opposite was true for the blog genre. We discuss the implications of these results in relation to the existing literature (based on surveys and laboratory-based experiments) on cultural differences in individual pride and collective pride.
Introduction
Pride is a basic human emotion and refers to a self-conscious emotion derived from one's achievements. Depending on whether such achievements are attributable to oneself or to a group to which one belongs, the sense of pride is labeled as either individual or group/collective pride (Berkowitz and Levy, 1956; Zander et al., 1972; Chakrabarti, 1992; Liu et al., 2014). Examples of groups include one's family, friends, team, and nation. Previous research has documented cross-cultural differences in pride in general and in individual pride and collective pride in particular, but no study has examined cultural differences in individual pride and collective pride using text corpora.
A number of studies have shown that pride may be influenced by culture (Stipek et al., 1989; Mauro et al., 1992; Stipek, 1998; Eid and Diener, 2001; Scollon et al., 2004; Neumann et al., 2009). Eid and Diener (2001) identified the differences between individualistic cultures and collectivistic cultures with respect to self-reflective emotions (e.g., pride and guilt). Of relevance to the current study is the finding that the frequency and intensity of pride were lower in collectivistic cultures than in individualistic cultures. Because Eid and Diener (2001) used scenarios involving personal achievements, it is not known whether group or collective pride showed the same pattern of cultural differences. Recently, Sznycer and colleagues conducted two cross-cultural studies on pride-eliciting situations: one (Sznycer et al., 2017) involving 16 countries across four continents, but all being Western, Educated, Industrialized, and Democratic (WEIRD) cultures, and the other (Sznycer et al., 2018) involving 10 non-WEIRD small communities across Central and South Americas, Africa, and Asia. They found a high level of cross-cultural similarity (mean r = 0.81) within the WEIRD samples and a much lower level of agreement among the non-WEIRD samples (r = 0.21). It is also worth noting that like Eid and Diener (2001), Sznycer et al. (2017, 2018) focused on individual pride (all 10 scenarios in their 2018 study and 22 of the 25 scenarios in their 2017 study were about individual pride, with only three in their 2017 study being about relational pride; no scenarios covered national pride).
Theoretically, members of individualistic cultures tend to construe the self as separate from their social context and develop independent self-construal and individual pride, whereas members of collectivistic cultures tend to perceive the self as a constituent of the social context and thus develop interdependent self-construal and collective pride (Markus and Kitayama, 1991). Indeed, an earlier study indicated that different types of pride were distinctly influenced by cultural backgrounds. Stipek (1998) found that individuals in collectivistic cultures (e.g., China) would experience stronger pride if their children were accepted into a prestigious University than if they themselves were accepted, whereas people in individualistic cultures (e.g., the United States) would experience equal pride in these two circumstances. Through a cultural priming study, Neumann et al. (2009) also noted that cultural orientation affected the experience of pride: Interdependent self-construal priming led to greater pride in achievements of others, whereas independent self-construal priming led to greater pride in personal achievements.
Cross-cultural research on pride remains quite limited. Furthermore, relevant studies have primarily relied on the questionnaire or scenario data, which are subject to social desirability and self-serving biases (Taylor and Brown, 1988; Dunning et al., 1989, 1991; Lindeman and Verkasalo, 1995; Paulhus and John, 1998; Dunning, 1999; Robins and Beer, 2001). One method to overcome the limitations of self-report data is to use semantic analysis, which can mitigate ethnocentric bias (Gladkova, 2010) as well as social desirability and self-serving biases (Cohen, 2011). Several scholars have examined cultural differences using corpus-based methods (Gladkova, 2010; Apresjan, 2013). For example, Apresjan (2013) found that Russian speakers tended to express more passive emotions (e.g., fear) than English speakers, whereas English speakers tended to express more active negative emotions (e.g., anger).
Another limitation of the existing research on cultural differences in pride is its lack of differentiation of collective pride. Recent research has indicated that collective pride should be divided into relational pride and national pride (Liu et al., 2014; White and Branscombe, 2019). Relational pride concerns one's family, friends, and township (e.g., “When your friends achieve success” and “When your hometown is praised”). In contrast, national pride is tied to national achievements (e.g., “When a Chinese scientist receives the Nobel Prize”) (van Hilvoorde et al., 2010; Kavetsos, 2012; Meier and Mutz, 2016). Some studies have focused on national pride (Hjerm, 1998; Evans and Kelly, 2002; Smith and Kim, 2006), but they have not considered individual pride and relational pride.
The current study explored cultural differences in the frequencies of individual pride items and collective pride items between American and Chinese corpora. Considering that the suppression of pride is highly valued in China (Eid and Diener, 2001), we hypothesized that the absolute frequency of pride in the American corpus would be higher than that in the Chinese corpus. Within the pride items, however, we hypothesized that the frequency of mentions of individual pride would be higher in the American corpus than in the Chinese corpus, whereas the frequency of mentions of collective pride would be lower in the American corpus than in the Chinese corpus. Because previous research showed that emotional expressions differed by the genre of the corpus (Mahdar, 2018), we utilized two genres (blogs and news) to see whether cross-cultural differences depended on the genre.
Method
Corpus Selection
We used two freely available corpora in this study: the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA; available at https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/) and Beijing Language and the Culture University Corpus Center (BCC; available at http://bcc.blcu.edu.cn/). The COCA contains more than 1.0 billion words of the English text (20 million words per year from 1990 to 2019) and is equally divided among spoken language, fiction, magazines, newspapers, academic texts, web pages, blogs, and TV/movies. The spoken genre mainly included conversations from TV and radio programs in the United States, and the fiction genre included short stories and plays from magazines. Magazines and newspaper genres were from nearly 100 different magazines and newspapers from across the United States. The academic genre included literature from peer-reviewed journals covering the range of science, social sciences, and humanities. Web pages included web genres of academic, argument, fiction, information, and so on, from the US portion of the GLoWbE corpus. Blogs included texts from the US portion of the GloWbE corpus that were classified by Google as blogs. TV/movies included subtitles from OpenSubtitles.org and later the TV and movies corpora.
BCC contains nine languages, from which we selected modern Chinese. It includes more than 15 billion words of Chinese text (1990-2017) extracted from news, spoken language (e.g., microblogs), science and technology, literature, and other language styles. News genre materials were derived from the main newspapers in China, and the spoken genre mainly included information from microblogs. Science and technology genres included articles in academic journals published in China, and literature mainly included literary works.
To summarize, both corpora are very large and widely used and should be considered as comprehensive data of language use in their respective countries (Davies, 2010; Apresjan, 2013; Cheung and Larson, 2018; Darriba, 2019; Gao and Joh, 2019; Dang, 2020; Lu and Coxhead, 2020). To improve comparability of the two corpora, namely, blogs and news, we selected English blogs (only available for the year 2012) and Chinese blogs (only available for the year 2013). The news genres covered the years from 1990 to 2019 for both Chinese and English corpora.
Sampling
In the English corpus, we selected “pride” and “proud” along with their grammatical variations, including “prided,” “prides,” “priding,” “prouder,” and “proudest” (Apresjan, 2013). In the Chinese corpus, we selected “自豪,” “自大,” and “骄傲,” which are Chinese synonyms for “pride” and “proud.” These words were used as search keywords. For each keyword found in the corpora, the search returned the text that included 20 Chinese characters or punctuations before each keyword and 20 Chinese characters or punctuations after each keyword in the Chinese corpus, and 15 words or punctuations on each side of the keyword in the English corpus. These strings of texts were considered as items. On occasions when multiple keywords were contained in the same item, they were treated either as a single occurrence when multiple occurrences were about the same type of pride or as separate occurrences when they were about different types of pride. We identified 10,909 and 10,542 items in the blog and news genres of COCA, respectively, and the corresponding numbers of items were 42,502 and 45,675 in the BCC. From these items, we randomly selected about 1,500 items from each type of items (1,533 English blog items, 1,462 English news items, 1,512 Chinese blog items, and 1,574 Chinese news items; the minor variations were due to an effort to ensure that the distribution of the various keywords in the final selection was the same as that for the corpora). In sum, we included 2,995 items from COCA and 3,086 items from BCC.
Classification
Following Liu et al. (2014), we classified all items by pride type based on their linguistic context. Individual pride reflects personal qualities or behavior; relational pride concerns admirable qualities or behavior of one's friends, family members, hometown, or school; and national pride is related to admirable qualities or behavior of a nation (see Table 1).
Table 1
| Type | English | Chinese | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original item | English translation | ||
| Individual pride | No, I'm just joking. I've always prided myself on not having standard pick-up lines, which makes things that much more | 不大愿意受人控制”、“你以 自己能独立思考而自 豪”、“你希望别人尊重 你”……诸如此类的描述 | “[You] are not willing to be controlled by others,” “you are proud of your ability to think independently,” “you want others to respect you,” and so on |
| Relational pride | That women's chief priority is to serve their families, she not only took pride in her two daughters' achievements but also encouraged our career plans. We took | 了!宝贝，加油!妈妈为你的 沉着和勇敢感到骄傲!但愿 大家都平平安安，和和美 美!但愿我的一 | ! Come on, Dear! Mom is proud of your composure and courage! May everyone be safe and at peace! I wish my |
| National pride | Must feel substantial and look majestic enough to engender national pride. # On the other hand, this currency cannot be costly to | 愈来愈强盛。我不禁为祖国 的成就感到无比的自豪、骄 傲，在心中呼喊着：祖国， 生日快乐！我衷 | More and more powerful. I cannot help but feel extremely proud of the achievements of my motherland, and I cry in my heart: Happy Birthday to my motherland! I sincerely |
| General pride | Physical gatherings and return to digital realms. Instead, alt-right gangs such as the Proud Boys, the Atomwaffen Division, and their followers, have become bolder, engaging in | 大众音乐文化，倒真是“来 不得半点的虚伪和骄傲”。 听众一般并不会因为社会炒 作的厉害不厉害 | The popular music culture, which really “cannot afford to have any dishonesty and pride.” The audience will generally not fall for any hypes |
| Non-Pride | Such as lions, which often hunt and raise their cubs along rivers. Lion prides have the highest reproductive success when their territories are in areas where rivers come together | 好是个黄金单身汉 吧!12月21日综合报导自 大S替小S代班主持《康熙 来了》收视屡创新高 | You'd better be a desirable bachelor! On December 21, it was reported that since Big S replaced Little S as the host, the TV show “Here Come Kang & Xi” has set a new record in its ratings. [“since big” has the same characters as self-pride in Chinese] |
Examples of individual pride and collective pride.
Four bilingual research assistants, one majoring in both psychology and English and the others majoring in psychology and passed College English Test Band 6 (CET-6, which is considered as proficient enough to read English newspaper articles and materials of general interests), were divided into two groups: One group classified 854 English and 1,589 Chinese items, and the other group classified 2,141 English and 1,497 Chinese items. These four coders were trained how to classify the text by type of pride: individual pride, relational pride, national pride, general pride (the items with little or no information to be coded by the above types of pride), and non-pride (the items with the keyword but not related to pride as an emotion, e.g., a pride of lions, see an example in Table 1). The two coders in each group practiced on 100 Chinese items and 100 English items and discussed any misclassifications. Finally, these two coders in each group independently coded all materials. For one group, the intercoder reliability (kappa coefficient) was 0.87 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.89] for the Chinese materials and 0.84 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.87] for the English materials. For the other group, the intercoder reliability was 0.90 [95% CI: 0.88, 0.92] for the Chinese materials and 0.82 [95% CI: 0.79, 0.84] for the English materials. A kappa coefficient of 0.81–1.00 is considered as showing as an almost-perfect agreement (Landis and Koch, 1977). For the items, the two coders disagreed (363 English items and 253 Chinese items); they were discussed and resolved in a group session involving the two coders as well as one of the corresponding authors. The non-pride items (170 English and 28 Chinese items) were excluded from further analysis, yielding 1,465 English items and 1,493 Chinese items from the blog genre and 1,360 English items and 1,565 Chinese items from the news genre in the final analysis.
The frequency results were analyzed using a chi-squared test. To determine which type of pride differed significantly between the two corpora, we calculated the adjusted standardized residuals (z-score) by standardizing the difference between observed values and expected values (Sharpe, 2015). The absolute value of adjusted residuals >2 is considered to be significant at α = 0.05 (Haberman, 1973).
Results
The total frequencies of the pride items were much higher in the English corpus (86.93 and 85.74 usages per million words for the blog genre and the news genre, respectively), than in the Chinese corpus (14.17 and 22.84 usages per million words).
For the blog genre, a chi-squared test showed a significant association between culture (Chinese and American) and pride (individual, relational, national, and general), χ2(3, N = 2,958) = 97.13, p < 0.001, Cramer's V = 0.18, which indicates slightly larger than a medium effect size (0.17) according to Cohen (1988). For the news genre, a chi-squared test showed a significant association between culture and pride, χ2(3, N = 2,925) = 278.50, p < 0.001, Cramer's V = 0.31, which is larger than a large effect size (0.29) (Cohen, 1988). For both genres, compared with the Chinese corpus, the American corpus contained more items pertaining to individual pride and fewer items pertaining to relational pride (see Table 2). For national pride, cross-cultural differences showed opposite patterns for the two genres: The Chinese news genre contained more national pride items than its American counterpart, whereas the opposite was true for the blog genre. The remainder category (general pride) also showed opposite patterns—a higher frequency for Chinese blogs than for American blogs but a lower frequency for Chinese news than for American news.
Table 2
| China | America | z-score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Percent % | Frequency | Percent % | ||
| Blog genres | |||||
| Individual pride | 547 | 36.6 | 660 | 45.1 | −4.67 |
| Relational pride | 532 | 35.6 | 444 | 30.3 | 3.09 |
| National pride | 64 | 4.3 | 158 | 10.8 | −6.73 |
| General pride | 350 | 23.4 | 203 | 13.9 | 6.75 |
| News genres | |||||
| Individual pride | 402 | 25.7 | 668 | 49.1 | −13.40 |
| Relational pride | 657 | 42.0 | 430 | 31.6 | 5.84 |
| National pride | 414 | 26.5 | 117 | 8.6 | 13.23 |
| General pride | 92 | 5.9 | 145 | 10.7 | −4.66 |
Individual pride and collective pride in Chinese and American corpora.
The absolute value of z-score >2 is considered to be significant.
Discussion
We used the corpus-based methods to examine cultural differences in individual and collective (i.e., relational and national) pride between Americans and Chinese. These methods can mitigate to some extent the clear methodological disadvantages of questionnaire-based methods, including ethnocentric, social desirability, and self-serving biases (Taylor and Brown, 1988; Dunning et al., 1989, 1991; Lindeman and Verkasalo, 1995; Paulhus and John, 1998; Dunning, 1999; Robins and Beer, 2001; Cohen, 2011).
Our first finding was that the American corpus had higher baseline usage of pride-related words than the Chinese corpus. This finding suggests that Americans tend to express pride, whereas Chinese tend to suppress the expression of pride. Indeed, as mentioned earlier, Eid and Diener (2001) previously found that Chinese reported experiencing pride at a lower frequency and with a lower level of intensity than did Americans. More than for the emotion of pride, researchers (e.g., Russell and Yik, 1996) have recognized that Chinese people consider it to be a desirable trait to suppress many kinds of emotions (both positive and negative).
Within the usage of pride-related items, we found that the American corpus (of both news and blog genres) included a higher proportion of individual pride items and a lower proportion of relational pride items than the Chinese corpus. These findings are consistent with our hypothesis derived from a theoretical discussion of the implications of individualism-collectivism and independent/interdependent self-construal of emotions (Markus and Kitayama, 1991; Triandis and Gelfand, 1998; Brewer and Chen, 2007). Our results also echo empirical evidence from prior research using questionnaires (Stipek, 1998; Scollon et al., 2004) and cultural priming (Neumann et al., 2009).
Expressions of individual pride in interdependent cultures may be decreased or avoided to minimize potential interpersonal conflict and maintain social harmony (Scollon et al., 2004; Matsumoto et al., 2008). Indeed, individual pride may be associated with negative emotions in Asian cultures (Stipek, 1998; Scollon et al., 2004). Chinese individuals may also be more modest than individuals in Western cultures, especially in terms of individual pride (Heine et al., 1999). However, relational pride is encouraged in Eastern cultures; several studies have suggested that collective culture promotes pride for others (such as one's family, friends, and team) (Stipek et al., 1989; Neumann et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2014).
In terms of national pride, however, we found that cultural differences depended on the genre. The Chinese news genre contained more national pride items than did the American news genre, but the opposite was true for the blog genre. A possible explanation is that the traditional Chinese news media (such as newspapers and news journals) still play a significant propaganda-related role by focusing on the positive achievements of the country (Stockmann and Gallagher, 2011). In contrast, the American news media may be more critical of their government, hence focusing less on national achievements. Private citizens, on the other hand, might have reacted to the national news media and hence showed an opposite pattern. Future research is needed to test this speculation.
Finally, there were also cultural differences in the general pride category—more such items in the Chinese blog genre than in the American blog genre, but the opposite for the news genre. This pattern does not easily lend to a theoretically meaningful explanation. However, because these data were based on the proportions (i.e., relative to other categories), it might have just reflected the consequences of the other cultural differences discussed above. To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine cultural differences in individual and collective pride based on specific corpora. Our findings extend the collectivistic characterization of Chinese to include relational pride and national pride. The results also support the notion that culture as well as other factors (e.g., political factors) plays an important role in emotional expression (e.g., Mesquita and Frijda, 1992; Kitayama et al., 1997, 2006; Matsumoto et al., 1998; Mesquita, 2001; Tsai and Park, 2014; Tsai et al., 2016).
Several limitations of this study and their implications for future research need to be mentioned. First, we relied on limited cultural corpus samples (Chinese and American), to represent individualistic and collectivistic cultures. We did not include other major varieties of English language such as British and Australian English, which have been found to involve different cultural scripts in emotional expressions (Goddard, 2012). Future research should replicate our finding using corpora from other varieties of the English language as well as other languages representing individualistic cultures (e.g., German and French) and collectivistic cultures (e.g., Japanese, Korean, Mexican, and Spanish). Second, we did not analyze temporal changes in individual pride and collective pride. Several recent studies have indicated that cultural patterns can shift over time (Twenge et al., 2013; Hamamura and Xu, 2015; Zeng and Greenfield, 2015). Future research should consider time-series analysis. Such an approach may also reveal the importance of single events on national pride (c.f., the role of sporting events in national pride, Kavetsos, 2012). Finally, our text analysis can be complemented by cross-cultural experiments that would reveal relevant cognitive and emotional mechanisms.
Statements
Data availability statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found at: http://bcc.blcu.edu.cn/; https://www.englishcorpora.org/coca/.
Ethics statement
This study was carried out in accordance with recommendations of the Research Ethics Committee of Renmin University of China with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Renmin University of China.
Author contributions
CL and GY designed the original study and conducted final critical revision. JL, HW, and LY conducted literature searches and statistical analysis. CL and CC wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (18YJA190007), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Research Funds of Renmin University of China (20XNA028).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.513779/full#supplementary-material
References
1
ApresjanV. (2013). Corpus methods in pragmatics: the case of english and Russian emotions. Intercult. Pragmat.10, 533–568. 10.1515/ip-2013-0026
2
BerkowitzL.LevyB. I. (1956). Pride in group performance and group-task motivation. J. Abnorm. Psychol.53, 300–306. 10.1037/h0041526
3
BrewerM. B.ChenY. R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychol. Rev.114, 133–151. 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133
4
ChakrabartiA. (1992). Individual and collective pride. Am. Philos. Q.29, 35–43.
5
CheungC. C. H.LarsonR. K. (2018). ‘Make’ causatives in english and Mandarin. Lingua Sin.4, 1–22. 10.1186/s40655-018-0036-9
6
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical Power for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7
CohenS. J. (2011). Measurement of negativity bias in personal narratives using corpus-based emotion dictionaries. J. Psycholinguist. Res.40, 119–135. 10.1007/s10936-010-9158-7
8
DangT. N. Y. (2020). High-frequency words in academic spoken english: corpora and learners. ELT J.74, 146–155. 10.1093/elt/ccz057
9
DarribaP. G. (2019). Self-directed motion in spontaneous and translated ENGLISH: A comparable corpora study. Across Lang. Cult.20, 213–233. 10.1556/084.2019.20.2.4
10
DaviesM. (2010). The corpus of contemporary American english as the first reliable monitor corpus of english. Liter. Linguist. Comput.25, 447–464. 10.1093/llc/fqq018
11
DunningD. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1–11. 10.1207/s15327965pli1001_1
12
DunningD.MeyerowitzJ. A.HolzbergA. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: the role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.57, 1082–1090. 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082
13
DunningD.PerieM.StoryA. L. (1991). Self-serving prototypes of social categories. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.61, 957–968. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.957
14
EidM.DienerE. (2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: inter- and intranational differences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.81, 869–885. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.869
15
EvansM. D. R.KellyJ. (2002). National pride in the developed world: survey data from 24 nations. Int. J. Public Opin. Res.14, 303–338. 10.1093/ijpor/14.3.303
16
GaoJ.JohY. K. (2019). Chinese zodiac culture and the rhetorical construction of A Shu B, C. Lang. Res.55, 55–74. 10.30961/lr.2019.55.1.55
17
GladkovaA. (2010). A linguist's view of “pride”. Emot. Rev.2, 178–179. 10.1177/1754073909355014
18
GoddardC. (2012). ‘Early interactions’ in Australian english, American english, and English english: cultural differences and cultural scripts. J. Pragmat.44, 1038–1050. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.010
19
HabermanS. J. (1973). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics29, 205–220. 10.2307/2529686
20
HamamuraT.XuY. (2015). Changes in Chinese culture as examined through changes in personal pronoun usage. J. Cross Cult. Psychol.46, 930–941. 10.1177/0022022115592968
21
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychol. Rev.106, 766–794. 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766
22
HjermM. (1998). National identities, national pride and xenophobia: a comparison of four western countries. Acta Sociol.41, 335–347. 10.1177/000169939804100403
23
KavetsosG. (2012). National pride: war minus shooting. Soc. Indicat. Res.106, 173–185. 10.1007/s11205-011-9801-1
24
KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.MatsumotoH.NorasakkunkitV. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.72, 1245–1267. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1245
25
KitayamaS.MesquitaB.KarasawaM. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.91, 890–903. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890
26
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics33, 159–174. 10.2307/2529310
27
LindemanM.VerkasaloM. (1995). Personality, situation, and positive-negative asymmetry in socially desirable responding. Euro. J. Pers.9, 125–134. 10.1002/per.2410090206
28
LiuC.LaiW.YuG.ChenC. (2014). The individual and collective facets of pride in Chinese college students. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol.36, 176–189. 10.1080/01973533.2014.883516
29
LuC.CoxheadA. (2020). Vocabulary in traditional Chinese medicine: insights from corpora. Int. J. Appl. Linguist.171, 34–61. 10.1075/itl.18020.lu
30
MahdarM. (2018). A Corpus-based analysis of the adjective collocates of ‘sorry’ in different genres, in International Conference on Language Phenomena in Multimodal Communication (KLUA 2018) (Paris: Atlantis Press). 10.2991/klua-18.2018.61
31
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev.98, 224–253. 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
32
MatsumotoD.TakeuchiS.AndayaniS.KouznetsovaN.KruppD. (1998). The contribution of individualism vs. collectivism to cross-national differences in display rules. Asian J. Soc. Psychol.1, 147–165. 10.1111/1467-839X.00010
33
MatsumotoD.YooS. H.FontaineJ.Anguas-WongA. M.ArriolaM.AtacaB.et al. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world: the relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. J. Cross Cult. Psychol.39, 55–74. 10.1177/0022022107311854
34
MauroR.SatoK.TuckerJ. (1992). The role of appraisal in human emotions: a cross cultural study. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.62, 301–317. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.301
35
MeierH. E.MutzM. (2016). Sport-related national pride in east and west Germany, 1992-2008: persistent differences or trends toward convergence?. SAGE Open6:2158244016665893. 10.1177/2158244016665893
36
MesquitaB. (2001). Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.80, 68–74. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.68
37
MesquitaB.FrijdaN. H. (1992). Cultural variations in emotions: a review. Psychol. Bull.112, 179–204. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.179
38
NeumannR.SteinhäuserN.RoederU. R. (2009). How self-construal shapes emotion: cultural differences in the feeling of pride. Soc. Cogn.27, 327–337. 10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.327
39
PaulhusD. L.JohnO. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: the interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. J. Pers.66, 1025–1060. 10.1111/1467-6494.00041
40
RobinsR. W.BeerJ. S. (2001). Positive illusions about the self: short-term benefits and long-term costs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.80, 340–352. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.340
41
RussellJ. A.YikM. S. M. (1996). Emotion among the Chinese, in The Handbook of Chinese Psychology, eds BondM. H. (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press), 166–188.
42
ScollonC. N.DienerE.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2004). Emotions across cultures and methods. J. Cross Cult. Psychol.35, 304–326. 10.1177/0022022104264124
43
SharpeD. (2015). Chi-square test is statistically significant: now what?Pract. Assess. Res. Evaluat.20, 1–20. 10.7275/tbfa-x148
44
SmithT. W.KimS. (2006). National pride in comparative perspective: 1995/96 and 2004/04. Int. J. Public Opin. Res.18, 127–136. 10.1093/ijpor/edk007
45
StipekD. (1998). Differences between Americans and Chinese in the circumstances evoking pride, shame, and guilt. J. Cross Cult. Psychol.29, 616–629. 10.1177/0022022198295002
46
StipekD.WeinerB.LiK. (1989). Testing some attribution-motion relations in the people's republic of China. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.56, 109–116. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.109
47
StockmannD.GallagherM. E. (2011). Remote control: how the media sustain authoritarian rule in China. Comparat. Polit. Stud.44, 436–467. 10.1177/0010414010394773
48
SznycerD.Al-ShawafL.Bereby-MeyerY.CurryO. S.De SmetD.ErmerE.et al. (2017). Cross-cultural regularities in the cognitive architecture of pride. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.114, 1874–1879. 10.1073/pnas.1614389114
49
SznycerD.XygalatasD.AlamiS.AnX. F.AnanyevaK. I.FukushimaS.et al. (2018). Invariances in the architecture of pride across small-scale societies. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sic. U.S.A.115, 8322–8327. 10.1073/pnas.1808418115
50
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol. Bull.103, 193–210. 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
51
TriandisH. C.GelfandM. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.74, 118–128. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118
52
TsaiJ. L.AngJ. Y. Z.BlevinsE.GoernandtJ.FungH. H.JiangD.et al. (2016). Leaders' smiles reflect cultural differences in ideal affect. Emotion16, 183–195. 10.1037/emo0000133
53
TsaiJ. L.ParkB. K. (2014). The cultural shaping of happiness: the role of ideal affect, in The Light and Dark Sides of Positive Emotion, eds MoskowitzJ.GruberJ. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 345–362. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199926725.003.0019
54
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.GentileB. (2013). Changes in pronoun use in American books and the rise of individualism, 1960-2008. J. Cross Cult. Psychol.44, 406–415. 10.1177/0022022112455100
55
van HilvoordeI.EllingA.StokvisR. (2010). How to influence national pride? The olympic medal index as a unifying narrative. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport45, 87–102. 10.1177/1012690209356989
56
WhiteM. H.II.BranscombeN. R. (2019). “Patriotism à la carte”: perceived legitimacy of collective guilt and collective pride as motivators for political behavior. Polit. Psychol.40, 223–240. 10.1111/pops.12524
57
ZanderA.FullerR.ArmstrongW. (1972). Attributed pride or shame in group and self. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.23, 346–352. 10.1037/h0033169
58
ZengR.GreenfieldP. M. (2015). Cultural evolution over the last 40 years in China: using the google ngram viewer to study implications of social and political change for cultural values. Int. J. Psychol.50, 47–55. 10.1002/ijop.12125
Summary
Keywords
corpora individual and collective pride, Chinese, American, collective pride, individual pride
Citation
Liu C, Li J, Chen C, Wu H, Yuan L and Yu G (2021) Individual Pride and Collective Pride: Differences Between Chinese and American Corpora. Front. Psychol. 12:513779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.513779
Received
21 November 2019
Accepted
23 April 2021
Published
19 May 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Eirini Mavritsaki, Birmingham City University, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Kosuke Takemura, Shiga University, Japan; Chetan Sinha, O.P. Jindal Global University, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Liu, Li, Chen, Wu, Yuan and Yu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Guoliang Yu yugllxl@sina.comConghui Liu liuconghui2001@ruc.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Cultural Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.