1. Introduction
Breast cancer is one of the most frequent cancers among women worldwide and strongly affects Quality of Life (Ferlay et al., 2015; Andreis et al., 2018). On a physical level, oncological treatments and interventions (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy) greatly impact the body (Serletti et al., 2011). Body image (BI) is conceptualized as an “internal representation of one's own outer appearance” (Thompson et al., 1999, p. 4). Specifically, BI does not refer only to the appearance on an aesthetical level but also to the mental representation of the body and its related emotions (Lewis-Smith et al., 2018; Sebri et al., 2020). Undesirable appearance-related side effects of breast cancer such as the loss of one or both breasts, hair loss, and scarring after surgical intervention have relevant psychological effects on BI and related wellbeing (Falbjork et al., 2013; Fioretti et al., 2017). Current research has highlighted the impact of surgical procedures (i.e., mastectomy with/without breast reconstruction and breast-conserving surgery) on BI (Collins et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012). A systematic-review by Martins Faria et al. (2021) evidenced that mastectomy impairs BI strongly, in both the short and long-term. Particularly, radical breast removal decreases BI satisfaction in comparison to less radical procedures, such as breast- conserving surgery. In this regard, breast removal leaves a permanent and negative mark on the perception of the own body even after a cure. Similarly, Zhou et al. (2020) stated that many women experience BI disturbance after surgery due to the less body satisfaction. Accordingly, women with a history of breast cancer may perceive their body as a source of danger and fear. Interoceptive sensations, once ignored, suddenly become salient, with the risk of promoting the fear of cancer recurrence (Harris et al., 2017). This may be seen a behavioral level as women may perform “checking behaviors” such as excessive breast self-examinations daily (McGinty et al., 2016). To address these findings, the purpose of this contribution is to describe a proposal for a new psychological intervention focused on body compassion, which would promote compassion and BI to improve quality of life in women with a history of breast cancer.
2. Body, sexuality, and intimate relationships after cancer
Because of breast cancer treatment sexuality and intimate relationships can become difficult (Bishop, 2015), impacting the couple's life. Changes in the body and in the evaluation of women femininity allows for a perception of sexual unattractiveness (Sebri et al., 2021b). Moreover, oncological treatments can lead to the fear of losing fertility, which may impact monogamous relationships. Women rely on their partner to perform crucial roles of providing emotional support, managing finance, and making decisions, which can lead to high levels of distress (Akpor et al., 2022). Despite this, the partner is essential in the promotion the survivor's wellbeing, which serves to support the couple throughout the cancer journey. Literature shows the relevance of supporting marital adjustment to avoid excessive distress and anxiety (Suo et al., 2022) and strongly reduce negative BI (Akpor et al., 2022). BI impairments can also affect social relationships. Specifically, a negative BI may lead women to constantly scrutinize their body with the fear of being different from cultural stereotypes through the development of negative emotions (Sherman et al., 2018; Triberti et al., 2019). In line with the Self Discrepancy Theory by Higgins (1987), the higher the discrepancy between “whom they perceive to be” and “whom they would like to be,” the higher psychopathological outcomes and emotional issues could be observed. In this regard, impairments in emotional regulation can be observed in young women with a history of breast cancer especially (Miyashita et al., 2015). After oncological treatments, the risk of incurring premature menopause and consequently to the risk of infertility can change the perception of body and femininity, in particular for young women (Camp-Sorrell, 2009). Moreover, young women could experience the difficulty in managing their fear of not seeing their child/children grow up (Miyashita et al., 2015).
Starting from the background, women with a history of breast cancer tend to reframe their identity as that of a or “woman at risk,” leading to rethinking future expectations and taking health management into account (Gibson et al., 2015; McGannon et al., 2016; Moskalewicz et al., 2022). In this way, women need to deal with a renovated overall self, which is described as a system of cognitive and affective schemas that affects life-meanings and decisions (Christoff et al., 2011; Sui and Humphreys, 2015; Sebri et al., 2021c). Women tend to show a new self-representation, called Injured Self, an illness-schema rich with emotions and autobiographical memories related to the oncological journey, which is particularly relevant to create images of the self (Sebri et al., 2020). Thus, it is essential to integrate Injured Self and its related illness-memories into the overall self, by linking current self-representations, beliefs, and aims consistently to avoid self-fragmentation and promote wellbeing (Conway, 2005; Sebri et al., 2020).
Breast cancer patients and survivors need to integrate various self-schemas into a coherent one. For this aim, the episodic memory system provides input to the working self and includes some knowledge in autobiographical memory influenced by goal-relevance (Conway, 2005). This way, the working self is particularly important to create appropriate images of the Self following the self-coherence request (Markus and Nurius, 1986). During memory construction, the working self is indeed the moderator between the demands of memory (that corresponds to reality and actual experiences) and coherence (memory that should be consistent with one's current self-images, beliefs, and aims) (Conway et al., 2004).
The construction of a positive BI depends on the individual experience of the illness and on the possibility of addressing bodily issues and their related emotion to promote a new positive perception of the body after cancer. A recent meta-analysis showed the efficacy of novel and mixed-method psychological interventions (e.g., physical exercises, art therapy, and web-based interventions) to avoid self-fragmentation and promoting a positive BI, personal strength, and cognitive abilities (e.g., decision making and attention; Sebri et al., 2021a). The majority of the psychological interventions were focused on cognitive-behavioral/existential, interpersonal, psychosocial, supportive, emotionally expressive, and educational approaches (Blanco et al., 2014; Savioni et al., 2022). Additionally, recent studies highlighted the relevance of psychological interventions based on mindfulness and self-compassion intervention thanks to the promotion of kindness and lack of self-judgment, which are relevant to promote wellbeing in women with a history of breast cancer (Neff, 2003; Chang et al., 2021; Mifsud et al., 2021). Specifically, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) intervention allows women to have kindness and care toward the body specifically (Matchim et al., 2011).
3. The role of body compassion on injured self
Self-compassion is defined as the kindness toward the self and it is characterized by lack of self-judgment, acknowledging past trauma, and consideration of suffering as part of the human condition (Lazarus, 1991; Neff, 2003; Jazaieri et al., 2014). Kirby (2017) embodied this definition through their Compassion Cultivation Training. This program focused on promoting compassion toward others, in order to highlight positive outcomes, decrease suffering, and improve life satisfaction. When self-compassion is referred to the physical self on a cognitive, emotional, and behavioral level, it can be defined as body compassion (Altman et al., 2020). In other words, psychological interventions focused on body compassion have the goal of promoting attitudes of kindness and care with a specific focus on the body (Strauss et al., 2016; Van Niekerk et al., 2021). In accordance with it, a study by Matos et al. (2022) evidenced that the negative correlation between body compassion and emotional issues allows for the promotion of a positive BI.
In the breast cancer field, body compassion interventions can be relevant to promote positive emotions and attitudes toward the body after cancer (Sebri et al., 2022). Despite the efficacy of self-compassion interventions to promote BI (González-Hernández et al., 2021), there is a lack of understanding surrounding the efficacy of specific programs related to body compassion in women with a history of breast cancer. The purpose of this new psychological intervention based on body compassion and BI could be relevant to have a renovated perception of the body after cancer, focusing on attitudes of compassion toward the body and promoting wellbeing.
4. A body compassion intervention on BI: Contents and therapeutic aims
Based on the existing literature (e.g., Strauss et al., 2016; Kirby, 2017), we structured a new Body Compassion Intervention on Body Image to promote a positive BI in women with a history of breast cancer. According to Table 1, this psychological intervention will consist of four group sessions focused on recognizing negative emotions, accepting uncomfortable feelings, and promoting BI in women after cancer treatment. Specifically:
- Session 1: In the first session, the psycho-oncologist will introduce participants in taking care of the body after cancer with attitudes based on kindness and acceptance of their inner feelings. This aspect will help women to perceive their body not only as a source of danger and fear, but also as an ally. In fact, the intervention will introduce the possibility of a new and renovated body after cancer, with an integration of a new cancer-related self-representation, the Injured Self, in an overall and coherent self (Sebri et al., 2020). Furthermore, participants will be asked to share their motivations for participating in the group and their personal goals in a collaborative way (Durosini and Aschieri, 2021). Expected therapeutic aims will be a greater oncological adherence to treatments. Literature shows the relevance of patients' active role in their treatment and care (Castellano-Tejedor et al., 2015; Kondylakis et al., 2017).
- Session 2: In the second session, the psycho-oncologist will explain and introduce the mindfulness technique as an available tool in the psychological program to promote body awareness and general wellbeing. In particular, mindfulness-based stress reduction will improve participants' skills to recognize individuals' suffering and uncomfortable feelings related to the body, which generally increases the fear of cancer recurrence and emotional issues (AhmadiQaragezlou et al., 2020; Park et al., 2020). Specifically, women will be invited to be careful about their stressful sensation. Then, the psycho-oncologist will propose some strategies to manage distress and negative emotions, as suggested by the mindfulness-stress based reduction technique. Women will be invited to repeat the strategies indicated daily, especially when experiencing distress. This session will aim to associate BI and, in particular, each part of the body affected by cancer with positive feelings and emotions, decreasing negative sensations and feelings. Expected results will be the new possibility of thinking of the future and having positive expectations, adopting adaptive coping styles useful to face the Aisease (Zhang et al., 2010; Koch-Gallenkamp et al., 2016). This way, perceiving the body as a “helper” during everyday life challenges will help them to structure goal setting and future objectives (Sebri et al., 2022). After cancer, women may tend to perceive their body without physical energy and be unable to deal with daily challenges. This psychological intervention will aim to promote a positive perception of the body, which can sustain and manage everyday issues;
- Session 3: The third session will be focused on promoting bodily awareness by stressing the contact with the body and its sensations. In particular, women with a history of breast cancer will be more able to be aware of their inner sensations by reducing emotional arousal and promoting self-emotion regulation (Herwig et al., 2010). Moreover, the psycho-oncologist will introduce a discussion about common characteristics and shortcomings of humanity and recognize, elaborate, and accept the own body with its physical limits and difficulties. Breast cancer and its treatments change routines, relationships, and the lack of independence (Jacobs et al., 2018). In this session, the relevance of taking care will be highlighted. Therapeutic aims will focus on identifying and avoiding behaviors that cause stress. Participants will be accompanied in recognizing their needs and desire, without shame and fear of their inner sensations;
- Session 4: The last session will be focused on the practice of loving-kindness meditations conducted by the psycho-oncologist. The overall aim of this session will be focused on integrating the Injured Self into the overall Self by stressing bodily contact and its related emotions and, as a consequence, the acceptance of this new body after breast cancer (Sebri et al., 2020, 2022). Therapeutic aims will be based on reaching emotional regulation by promoting awareness of inner feelings and regaining control over them (Sebri et al., 2022).
Table 1
| The body compassion contents | Consequences on BI | Therapeutic aims in oncology |
|---|---|---|
| SESSION 1 Set the mind to the possibility of loving the body after cancer. Explore the individual's motivation to act and alleviate suffering related to the own BI | Women are introduced to the idea of loving their body, shifting from the perception of an “ill body” to a new and renovated one after cancer | Introduce the possibility of a lovely body to increase behaviors of positive and active adherence to treatments as a personal choice |
| SESSION 2 Explain and develop mindfulness skills by recognizing suffering and uncomfortable feelings related to the body | BI can now be associated with the feeling of relaxation. Participants may think of their bodies by experiencing positive emotions, not only fear of cancer recurrence | Rethink to the future in terms of new possibilities and challenges sustained by a body that can be able to manage fatigue and daily distress |
| SESSION 3 Gain awareness and compassion toward the own body after cancer through embracing our shared common humanity | The body compassion program could sustain the idea of human frailty by promoting the acceptance of a body that needs care and treatments | - Gain awareness and acceptance of physical limits - Promote independence and acceptance of personal limitations, sustained by others' help |
| SESSION 4 Practice loving-kindness meditation sessions conducted by a psycho-oncologist with expertise in mindfulness-stress based reduction intervention | The overall change in BI can be now led to the mental representations of a new body, which can be not only a source of fear but cared | Promote introspection and awareness for inner feelings to increase emotional regulation |
Sessions of the body compassion intervention on BI.
We recommended that this psychological program be conducted by a psycho-oncologist with an expertise in mindfulness-based stress reduction for oncological women (Kabat- Zinn, 1997; Segal et al., 2014).
5. Conclusion
Breast cancer may affect body perception deeply, with notable consequences on women with a history of breast cancer' quality of life (Lewis-Smith et al., 2018). The body after cancer is sometimes perceived as in constant need of support (Li et al., 2015; Rahmaningrum et al., 2020). Interoceptive and physical sensations lead to fear of cancer recurrence, negative emotions, and an illness-self schema (i.e., Injured Self; Sebri et al., 2020). All these aspects lead women to decrease their prospective thinking and goal setting, which are necessary for pursuing one's own personal future (Blanco et al., 2014). Promoting self-compassion in breast cancer patients is of paramount importance to promote kindness toward self and the body and to help the management of negative emotions. The present manuscript structured a new psychological intervention focused on body compassion that could help women to manage their emotional issues and promote a positive BI (Fafouti et al., 2010).
Limitations of the present contribution could be the generalization of this specific psychological program to other cancer populations due to the specific focus on breast cancer and its characteristics, which are strictly connected to femininity and body satisfaction. Future studies are required to better understand BI in people who received different oncological diagnoses and different interventions (e.g., mastectomy) to implement personalized interventions on women' needs. Future studies should still explore the other characteristics associated with chronic illness-related alterations to the overall self and the appropriate psychological interventions. It is also possible that body compassion has to be adapted to other chronic pathological conditions, focusing on the specificities of any disease. At the same time, future research should explore the efficacy of body compassion interventions with the integration of other activities, such as physical exercises, as sustained by literature (Beadle, 2020). For example, randomized control trials, longitudinal studies, and case studies are needed to support the present psychological program and assess its efficacy. It is needed to progress scientific investigation by capturing the causes, characteristics, and consequences of BI and Injured Self to tailor psychological interventions to women with a history of breast cancer' needs.
Statements
Author contributions
VS conceived the ideas presented in the article and wrote the first draft. ID contributed with discussion on the ideas presented and edited the manuscript. GP contributed with important intellectual contents and supervised the whole process. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Ricerca Corrente and 5×1000 funds.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AhmadiQaragezlouN.Rahimian BoogarI.AsadiJ.VojdaniR. (2020). The effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction on fear of cancer recurrence in colorectal and breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Middle East J. Cancer11, 216–224. 10.30476/MEJC.2019.78695.0
2
AkporO. A.KolawoleE. R.OlorunfemiO.OduyemiR. O. (2022). Breast cancer and body image: The roles of the male partner. APIK J Int Med.10.4103/ajim.ajim_108_21. [Epub ahead of print].
3
AltmanJ. K.LinfieldK.SalmonP. G.BeachamA. O. (2020). The body compassion scale: development and initial validation. J. Health Psychol.25, 439–449. 10.1177/1359105317718924
4
AndreisF.MeriggiF.CodignolaC.FrigoliI.ProchiloT.MuttiS.et al. (2018). Impact of a psycho-educational team in early breast cancer patients' coping strategies: the Venere project. Rev. Recent Clin. Trials13, 274–280. 10.2174/1574887113666180409152025
5
BeadleE. S. (2020). Body Shame, Body Compassion and Physical Activity. 10.18745/th.22613
6
BishopD. M. (2015). The Consequences of Self-Objectification: Investigating the Impact of Body Image on Female Sexual Functioning (BA).Muncie, IN: Ball State University.
7
BlancoC.MarkowitzJ. C.HershmanD. L.LevensonJ. A.WangS.GrannV. R. (2014). A pilot study of interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed women with breast cancer. Am. J. Psychother. 68, 489–495. 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2014.68.4.489
8
Camp-SorrellD. (2009). Cancer and its treatment effect on young breast cancer survivors, in Seminars in Oncology Nursing, Vol. 25 (WB Saunders), 251–258.
9
Castellano-TejedorC.Pérez-CampdepadrósM.CapdevilaL.Sábado-ÁlvarezC.Blasco-BlascoT. (2015). El apoyo social durante el cáncer infantil favorece la calidad de vida en periodo de supervivencia. Anales Psicología31, 808–817. 10.6018/analesps.31.3.193571
10
ChangY. C.YehT. L.ChangY. M.HuW. Y. (2021). Short-term effects of randomized mindfulness-based intervention in female breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs.44, E703–E714. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000889
11
ChenC. L.LiaoM. N.ChenS. C.ChanP. L.ChenS. C. (2012). Body image and its predictors in breast cancer patients receiving surgery. Cancer Nurs.35, E10–E16. 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182336f8b
12
ChristoffK.LegrandD.CosmelliD.ThompsonE. (2011). Specifying the self for cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn. Sci.15, 104–112. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.001
13
CollinsK. K.LiuY.SchootmanM.AftR.YanY.DeanG.et al. (2011). Effects of breast cancer surgery and surgical side effects on body image over time. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.126, 167–176. 10.1007/s10549-010-1077-7
14
ConwayM. A. (2005). Memory and the self. J. Mem. Lang. 53, 594–628. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005
15
ConwayM. A.SingerJ. A.TaginiA. (2004). The self and autobiographical memory: correspondence and coherence. Soc. Cogn. 22, 491–529. 10.1521/soco.22.5.491.50768
16
DurosiniI.AschieriF. (2021). Therapeutic assessment efficacy: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Assess. 33, 962–972. 10.1037/pas0001038
17
FafoutiM.PaparrigopoulosT.ZervasY.RabavilasA.MalamosN.LiappasI.et al. (2010). Depression, anxiety and general psychopathology in breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional control study. In Vivo24, 803–810.
18
FalbjorkU.RasmussenB. H.KarlssonS.SalanderP. (2013). Aspects of body image after mastectomy due to breast cancer-a two-year follow-up study. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 17, 340–345. 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.09.002
19
FerlayJ.SoerjomataramI.DikshitR.EserS.MathersC.RebeloM.et al. (2015). Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer. 136, E359–E386. 10.1002/ijc.29210
20
FiorettiC.MazzoccoK.PravettoniG. (2017). Psychological support in breast cancer patients: a personalized approach, in Breast Cancer, eds VeronesiU.GoldhirschA.VeronesiP.GentiliniO. D.LeonardiM. C. (Cham: Springer), 841–847.
21
GibsonA. F.LeeC.CrabbS. (2015). Reading between the lines: applying multimodal critical discourse analysis to online constructions of breast cancer. Qual. Res. Psychol.12, 272–286. 10.1080/14780887.2015.1008905
22
González-HernándezE.CamposD.Diego-PedroR.RomeroR.BañosR.NegiL. T.et al. (2021). Changes in the semantic construction of compassion after the cognitively-based compassion training (CBCT®) in women breast cancer survivors. Spanish J. Psychol.24. 10.1017/SJP.2021.31
23
HarrisR. E.IchescoE.CummifordC.HampsonJ. P.ChenevertT. L.BasuN.et al. (2017). Brain connectivity patterns dissociate action of specific acupressure treatments in fatigued breast cancer survivors. Front. Neurol.8, 298. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00298
24
HerwigU.KaffenbergerT.JänckeL.BrühlA. B. (2010). Self-related awareness and emotion regulation. NeuroImage50, 734–741. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.089
25
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychol. Rev. 94, 319–340. 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
26
JacobsM.JohnsonJ.MynattE. D. (2018). MyPath: investigating breast cancer patients' use of personalized health information. Proc. ACM Human Computer Interact.2, 1–21. 10.1145/3274347
27
JazaieriH.McGonigalK.JinpaT.DotyJ. R.GrossJ. J.GoldinP. R. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of compassion cultivation training: effects on mindfulness, affect, and emotion regulation. Motivat. Emot.38, 23–35. 10.1007/s11031-013-9368-z
28
Kabat- ZinnJ. (1997). Wherever You Go, There You Are: Mindfulness Meditation in Everyday Life. Hyperion, New-York. Tr. It. Dovunque tu vada ci sei gi0. Una guida alla meditazione. Tea pratica, Milano 2.
29
KirbyJ. N. (2017). Compassion interventions: the programmes, the evidence, and implications for research and practice. Psychol. Psychother. Theory Res. Prac.90, 432–455. 10.1111/papt.12104
30
Koch-GallenkampL.BertramH.EberleA.HolleczekB.Schmid-HöpfnerS.WaldmannA.et al. (2016). Fear of recurrence in long-term cancer survivors-do cancer type, sex, time since diagnosis, and social support matter?. Health Psychol.35, 1329. 10.1037/hea0000374
31
KondylakisH.BucurA.DongF.RenziC.ManfrinatiA.GrafN.et al. (2017). iManageCancer: developing a platform for Empowering patients and strengthening self-management in cancer diseases, in 2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) (IEEE), 755–760.
32
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33
Lewis-SmithH.DiedrichsP. C.HarcourtD. (2018). A pilot study of a body image intervention for breast cancer survivors. Body Image27, 21–31. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.006
34
LiX. T.TangL.ChenY.LiY. L.ZhangX. P.SunY. S. (2015). Visceral and subcutaneous fat as new independent predictive factors of survival in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.141, 1237–1247. 10.1007/s00432-014-1893-y
35
MarkusH.NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. Am. Psychol.41, 954. 10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
36
Martins FariaB.Martins RodriguesI.Verri MarquezL.da Silva PiresU.Vilges de OliveiraS. (2021). The impact of mastectomy on body image and sexuality in women with breast cancer: a systematic review. Psicooncología18, 91–115. 10.5209/psic.74534
37
MatchimY.ArmerJ. M.StewartB. R. (2011). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on health among breast cancer survivors. Western J. Nurs. Res.33, 996–1016. 10.1177/0193945910385363
38
MatosM.McEwanK.KanovskýM.HalamováJ.SteindlS. R.FerreiraN.et al. (2022). Compassion protects mental health and social safeness during the COVID-19 pandemic across 21 countries. Mindfulness. 13, 863–880. 10.1007/s12671-021-01822-2
39
McGannonK. R.BerryT. R.RodgersW. M.SpenceJ. C. (2016). Breast cancer representations in Canadian news media: a critical discourse analysis of meanings and the implications for identity. Qual. Res. Psychol.13, 188–207. 10.1080/14780887.2016.1145774
40
McGintyH. L.SmallB. J.LarongaC.JacobsenP. B. (2016). Predictors and patterns of fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors. Health Psychol.35, 1–9. 10.1037/hea0000238
41
MifsudA.PehlivanM. J.FamP.O'GradyM.van SteenselA.ElderE.et al. (2021). Feasibility and pilot study of a brief self-compassion intervention addressing body image distress in breast cancer survivors. Health Psychol. Behav. Med.9, 498–526. 10.1080/21642850.2021.1929236
42
MiyashitaM.OhnoS.KataokaA.TokunagaE.MasudaN.ShienT.et al. (2015). Unmet information needs and quality of life in young breast cancer survivors in Japan. Cancer Nurs.38, E1. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000201
43
MoskalewiczM.PopovaY.Wiertlewska-BielarzJ. (2022). Lived time in ovarian cancer-a qualitative phenomenological exploration. Euro. J. Oncol. Nurs.56, 102083. 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102083
44
NeffK. (2003). Self-compassion: an alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self Identity2, 85–101. 10.1080/15298860309032
45
ParkS.SatoY.TakitaY.TamuraN.NinomiyaA.KosugiT.et al. (2020). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for psychological distress, fear of cancer recurrence, fatigue, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in patients with breast cancer-a randomized controlled trial. J. Pain Symptom Manage.60, 381–389. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.02.017
46
RahmaningrumA.WibowoM. E.SugiyoS. (2020). The effectiveness of counseling with cognitive restructuring technique to improve the coping stress of cancer patients. J. Bimbingan Konseling9, 123–131. 10.15294/JUBK.V9I2.37870
47
SavioniL.TribertiS.DurosiniI.SebriV.PravettoniG. (2022). Cancer patients' participation and commitment to psychological interventions: a scoping review. Psychol. Health37, 1022–1055. 10.1080/08870446.2021.1916494
48
SebriV.DurosiniI.MazzoniD.PravettoniG. (2022). The body after cancer: a qualitative study on breast cancer survivors' body representation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health19, 12515. 10.3390/ijerph191912515
49
SebriV.DurosiniI.TribertiS.PravettoniG. (2021a). The efficacy of psychological intervention on body image in breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic-review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychol.12, 611954. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611954
50
SebriV.MazzoniD.TribertiS.PravettoniG. (2021b). The impact of unsupportive social support on the injured self in breast cancer patients. Front. Psychol.12, 722211. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722211
51
SebriV.TribertiS.PravettoniG. (2020). Injured self: autobiographical memory, self-concept, and mental health risk in breast cancer survivors. Front. Psychol. 11, 607514. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607514
52
SebriV.TribertiS.PravettoniG. (2021c). The self's choice: priming attentional focus on bodily self promotes loss frequency bias. Curr. Psychol.1–12. 10.1007/s12144-021-01400-8
53
SegalZ. V.WilliamsJ. M. G.TeasdaleJ. D. (2014). Mindfulness. Al di là del pensiero, attraverso il pensiero. nuova edizione ampliata e aggiornata con tredici tracce audio di meditazioni guidate. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri Editore.
54
SerlettiJ. M.FosnotJ.NelsonJ. A.DisaJ. J.BuckyL. P. (2011). Breast reconstruction after breast cancer. Plastic Reconstruct. Surg.127, 124e–135e. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318213a2e6
55
ShermanK. A.PrzezdzieckiA.AlcorsoJ.KilbyC. J.ElderE.BoyagesJ.et al. (2018). Reducing body image-related distress in women with breast cancer using a structured online writing exercise: results from the my changed body randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 1930–1940. 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.3318
56
StraussC.TaylorB. L.GuJ.KuykenW.BaerR.JonesF.et al. (2016). What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clin. Psychol. Rev.47, 15–27. 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.004
57
SuiJ.HumphreysG. W. (2015). The integrative self: how self-reference integrates perception and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci.19, 719–728. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015
58
SuoR.YeF.XieM.ZhangX.LiM.ZhangY.et al. (2022). The relationship of marital adjustment and posttraumatic growth in female breast cancer patients and their husbands. Psychol. Health Med.1–7. 10.1080/13548506.2022.2067339
59
ThompsonJ. K.HeinbergL. J.AltabeM.Tantleff-DunnS. (1999). Exacting Beauty: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment of Body Image Disturbance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60
TribertiS.GoriniA.SavioniL.SebriV.PravettoniG. (2019). Avatars and the disease: digital customization as a resource for self- perception assessment in breast cancer patients. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network.22, 558–564. 10.1089/cyber.2018.0461
61
Van NiekerkL. M.BromfieldH.MatthewsonM. (2021). Physical and psychological correlates of self and body compassion in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Health Psychol.27:11. 10.1177/13591053211059390
62
ZhangJ.WeiG. A. O.PingW. A. N. G.WuZ. H. (2010). Relationships among hope, coping style and social support for breast cancer patients. Chin. Med. J.123, 2331–2335. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.17.009
63
ZhouK.WangW.LiM.AnJ.HuoL.HeX.et al. (2020). Body image mediates the relationship between post-surgery needs and health-related quality of life among women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes18, 1–11. 10.1186/s12955-020-01400-5
Summary
Keywords
breast cancer, self, body image, injured self, body compassion
Citation
Sebri V, Durosini I and Pravettoni G (2023) How to address the body after breast cancer? A proposal for a psychological intervention focused on body compassion. Front. Psychol. 13:1085837. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1085837
Received
31 October 2022
Accepted
16 December 2022
Published
09 January 2023
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Valeria Donisi, University of Verona, Italy
Reviewed by
Christa Torrisi, University of Missouri System, United States; Sophie Lantheaume, Hopital prive Drome Ardeche, France; Maria Luisa Martino, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Sebri, Durosini and Pravettoni.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Valeria Sebri ✉valeria.sebri@ieo.it
This article was submitted to Psychology for Clinical Settings, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.