In the published article, there was an error in the Funding statement. This work was not supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences youth project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (WQ2020012). The correct Funding statement appears below.
Statements
Funding
The work was supported by the Henan Graduate Education Reform and Quality Improvement Project (Grant No. YJS2021AL074).
Additionally, in the published article, there were some errors in the text.
In section Pooled analyses, the wording “the random-effects model indicated a highly positive link of 0.429” should be changed to “the random-effects model indicated a highly positive link of 0.425.”
A correction has been made to Results, Pooled analyses. The corrected paragraph is shown below.
As demonstrated in Figure 2 and Table 2, the random-effects model indicated a highly positive link of 0.425 (95% CI [0.342, 0.501]) between PTG and social support. The association between PTG and social support was steady, as demonstrated by the Z value of 9.166 and p < 0.001. Furthermore, the homogeneity examination for 31 single samples revealed significant heterogeneity in the selected studies (Q = 447.63; p < 0.001; I2 = 93.3%) and potential moderating effects.
Lastly, in section Conclusion, the sentence “The summary Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.429” should be changed to “The summary Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.425.”
A correction has been made to Conclusion. The corrected section is shown below.
Although this study has some limitations, all available evidence suggests a highly positive connection between PTG and social support among people with breast cancer. The summary Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.425. This means that people with breast cancer with high degrees of social support were more likely to have a high level of PTG. Economic level, region, and social support measurement tools adjusted the positive connection between social support and PTG, while publication type, year of publication, and participants' age did not play a role in regulating either. Whether variables such as time since diagnosis, disease stage, and disease treatment moderate the connection between PTG and social support among people with breast cancer can be further investigated in the future.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
breast cancer, posttraumatic growth, social support, meta-analysis, review
Citation
Ma X, Wan X and Chen C (2023) Corrigendum: The correlation between posttraumatic growth and social support in people with breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 14:1129481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129481
Received
22 December 2022
Accepted
31 January 2023
Published
14 February 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited and reviewed by
Yufang Guo, Shandong University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Ma, Wan and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chaoran Chen ✉ kfccr@126.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Positive Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
‡ORCID: Chaoran Chen orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-2999
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.