Shiying Dang
Yan Jin
Xingmeng Niu2†- 1School of Clinical Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China
- 2School of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China
- 3Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China
Background: College students’ academic success and future growth are greatly impacted by achievement motivation, an innate desire for excellence. Higher education is an important time for students to socialize, and achievement motivation has a big impact on personal values, which is important for producing top-notch workers.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the current state of college students’ achievement motivation and the elements that influence it.
Methods: 2,849 students from a university in Shandong Province participated in a cross-sectional survey. The Achievement Motivation Scale was used to measure the motivation to strive for achievement vs. the motivation to avoid failure. SPSS version 27.0 was utilized for conducting descriptive statistics, single-factor analysis, and performing multiple linear regression analysis.
Results: College students’ average achievement motivation score was 4.38 ± 12.99, with a noticeably unequal distribution across motivation levels. Gender, parental literacy level, personal and parental health condition, family annual income, future goals, and short-term plans all showed statistically significant variations in achievement motivation, according to a single-factor analysis (p < 0.05). However, multiple linear regression analysis showed that the direct effects of variables like family annual income and parental literacy level were no longer significant after adjusting for inter-variable interactions.
Conclusion: This study confirms that gender, personal health condition, and short-term plans are important influencing factors and demonstrates considerable individual differences in university students’ achievement motivation with an uneven overall distribution. It offers both practical advice and theoretical foundations for applying differentiated instruction in higher education settings.
1 Introduction
The internal psychological drive that a person develops and sustains when confronted with worthwhile and significant goals is known as achievement motivation, and it is focused on the pursuit of success (Daumiller and Zarrinabadi, 2021). The achievement motivation theory states that “pursuing success” and “avoiding failure” are the two comparatively independent and opposing elements that make up this driving force (Brunstein and Heckhausen, 2025; Shang et al., 2023; Ehrlich and Bipp, 2016). The variations in a person’s choice of tasks, goal-setting, and degree of perseverance are determined by the relative intensity of the two. People who have high achievement motivation typically establish lofty objectives and put forth a lot of effort to achieve them. On the other hand, those with low achievement motivation may lack tenacity and perseverance and frequently select more easily attainable goals. People go through a transitional period during the university stage that is marked by slow psychological development, but they have not yet attained emotional and cognitive maturity. The creation of their work identity, the reconstruction of their value system, and the adjustment to a new social role are three crucial developmental tasks. Through mechanisms like self-efficacy, goal orientation, and career planning, the degree of achievement motivation indirectly affects post-graduation social adaption and inventive capacity in addition to directly influencing academic engagement and professional performance (Lu et al., 2024). As a result, higher education institutions must prioritize the development of achievement motivation in order to fulfill their objective of supporting student growth and long-term success.
Numerous elements, such as physical and mental health, family socioeconomic status, school education, social culture, self-efficacy, academic performance, and location of origin, are intimately linked to achievement motivation, according to research (Michou et al., 2014; Yang and Jiang, 2010; Butera et al., 2024). Specifically, the phenomenon of “poverty reinforcing achievement motivation” and the cross-cultural applicability of the four-element model of achievement motivation in the context of Chinese culture were confirmed in a large-sample study by Zeng et al. that used the latent profile analysis method for the first time (Zeng and Tu, 2024). This has significantly advanced the study of achievement motivation in China and supplied extremely useful empirical data for further research. This study focuses primarily on the one-dimensional influence of economic considerations on achievement motivation, despite its extensive scope and novel technique. In contrast, our study aims to develop a more multifaceted and thorough analytical framework for the factors influencing achievement motivation by thoroughly examining the impact of four core variables on achievement motivation: individual characteristics, family background, school education, and social environment. Furthermore, this study’s participants are first-year students. The development of this group’s achievement motivation has greater plasticity and research worth because they are just entering the university stage.
In order to improve college students’ achievement motivation, provide theoretical support and practical references for higher education management, mental health education, and future planning guidance, and ultimately promote the all-around development of college students as well as social harmony and progress, this study uses a cross-sectional survey design based on the theory of achievement motivation.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study population
This cross-sectional study was conducted from September to December 2024 among college students at a university in Shandong Province, utilizing a convenience whole cluster sampling method. The inclusion criteria were: (1) full-time college students formally enrolled in a university in Shandong Province; (2) A freshman of the class of 2024; (3) voluntary participation and signing of informed consent. The exclusion criteria were: (1) unofficially registered students; (2) students who were unable to complete the questionnaire due to physical or mental illness; (3) those who completed invalid questionnaires. A total of 3,201 questionnaires were distributed and 2,849 valid questionnaires were recovered, with a valid response rate of 89.0%. Before the survey, the staff was professionally trained, and during the survey, the students were introduced to the purpose, significance, and confidentiality principles to ensure that the questionnaires were independently completed and recovered promptly. The online survey was sent to class groups and other channels with a link to the questionnaire star, and a person was assigned to answer questions and remind students to complete the questionnaire regularly. Surveyors were trained uniformly to clarify the process and requirements to ensure that the questionnaire was designed concisely and clearly and that the survey site was strictly managed to resolve questions promptly and prevent students from answering randomly. During the data entry phase, we used two-person, dual-computer entry with strict calibration to ensure that the data were accurate and complete. During data analysis, we reviewed and cleaned the data again, eliminating outliers and erroneous data to ensure the reliability of the analysis results.
2.2 Questionnaire design
2.2.1 Self-organized personal information sheet
In the design process of this self-compiled personal information form, multiple elements that affect college students’ achievement motivation were fully considered. The basic information of college students was collected through questionnaire surveys. This study collected information from four dimensions: individual (gender, age, personal health condition), family (parents’ health condition, family structure), school (short-term plans), and society (future goals, family annual income, parents’ literacy level, living expenses), and obtained data through students’ self-reports. This approach can more comprehensively and deeply explore the influencing factors of college students’ achievement motivation, providing rich and valuable data support for subsequent analysis and research.
2.2.2 Achievement motivation scale
Achievement Motivation Scale was developed by Norwegian psychologists Gjesme, T. and Nygard, R. in 1970 and has been revised several times and gradually improved (Hermans, 1970). The Chinese version was translated by our researcher Ye Renmin in collaboration with Hegtvet, K. A. from Norway in 1988 and revised in 1992 in a sample of college and middle school students (Ye and Kh, 1992). Its use as a more mature scale for assessing individual achievement motivation characteristics and levels has been widely used in China (Elliot and Sommet, 2023). This scale contains 30 questions and is scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much): (1) “not at all” (2) “somewhat not at all” (3) “mostly at all “(4) “Very much in line.” The results of this scale, which measures both dimensions of achievement motivation, including Motivation to seek success and Motivation to avoid failure subscales (15 questions each), are more conducive to predicting an individual’s behavior, compared to a scale that only measures overall achievement motivation (Fan and Zhang, 2009). The achievement motivation score consists of the Motivation to seek success score minus the Motivation to avoid failure score, with higher scores indicating greater achievement motivation (Hermans, 1970).
2.3 Statistical methods
In this study, SPSS software was used to enter, organize, and analyze the collected data. All survey data were entered into SPSS 27.0, an internal consistency test was performed on the achievement motivation scale, and descriptive statistics, one-way and regression analysis were performed on the variables, where p < 0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 Reliability and validity test
3.1.1 Reliability
The reliability of the achievement motivation scale was gauged by investigating its internal concordance reliability, which was determined using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (see Table 1 for details). The analysis indicates that the overall internal consistency coefficient of the Achievement Motivation Scale is 0.782, suggesting that the scale possesses high reliability, substantial internal consistency, and the capacity to reliably and validly reflect the genuine thoughts and sentiments of the respondents, thereby ensuring the reliability and validity of the research outcomes.
Table 1. Reliability analysis of the achievement motivation scale.
3.1.2 Validity
The validity analysis of this scale was validated using KMO and Bartlett’s test (Table 2), which yielded a KMO value of 0.945 (KMO > 0.8), the study data were well suited for extracting the information (which side by side reflects the validity was very good) and Bartlett’s test of sphericity p < 0.05, which indicates that the data of the questionnaire has good validity (Deng et al., 2018).
Table 2. Validity analysis of the achievement motivation scale.
3.2 Common method bias assessment
Since all the data in this study were collected via self-administered questionnaires, there may be common method bias. Therefore, this study employed the method of controlling for the effects of an unmeasured latent methods factor technique for testing purposes (Tan and Yun, 2020). The results indicated that the baseline measurement model exhibited an acceptable fit (χ2/df = 9.818, CFI = 0.913, TLI = 0.900, RMSEA = 0.056). After introducing the common method factor, the model fit indices showed no significant improvement (χ2/df = 9.952, CFI = 0.911, TLI = 0.898, RMSEA = 0.056; ΔCFI < 0.01, ΔRMSEA < 0.01). This suggests that common method bias is not a substantial concern in this study (Cheung and Rensvold, 2002; Podsakoff et al., 2003). This study has good structural validity and can provide reliable data support for subsequent analysis.
3.3 Achievement motivation score
This study shows the basic distribution of achievement motivation among university students based on the analysis of data from 2,849 valid questionnaires (detailed results are provided in Tables 3, 4). Statistics showed that the sample’s overall achievement motivation score was 4.38 ± 12.99 points (minimum −42 points, maximum 45 points). Although more than half (59.00%) of the students exhibited good achievement motivation inclinations, more than one-third (36.12%) of the students received scores below zero. This implies an uneven distribution of achievement motivation scores among university students. The relatively high degree of dispersion in achievement motivation scores indicates that there is significant individual variance and group heterogeneity within the sample.
Table 3. Overall level of achievement motivation.
Table 4. Frequency distribution of achievement motivation scores (n = 2,849).
3.4 Descriptive statistics
A total of 3,201 questionnaires were distributed and 2,849 valid questionnaires were returned, of which 1,536 (53.9%) were female and 1,313 (46.1%) were male, with a mean age of 18.98 ± 1.21 years, and the highest percentage of students in the ≤18 years age group was 67.1% (1912). The rest of the demographics are detailed in Table 5.
Table 5. Descriptive analysis of basic demographic characteristics (n = 2,849).
3.5 Single-factor analysis
An individual’s psychological characteristics and behavioral habits are thought to be directly linked to achievement motivation. This study used the one-way analysis of variance method to investigate the impact of demographic factors on college students’ achievement motivation, including gender, parents’ literacy level, parents’ physical and personal health condition, family annual income, future goals, and short-term plans. The findings demonstrate that a variety of factors, including gender, personal health condition, parents’ health condition, future goals, and short-term plans, have a substantial impact on college students’ level of accomplishment motivation. In particular, all aspects of achievement motivation exhibit highly significant gender differences (p < 0.001), with a moderate impact size. When it comes to overall achievement motivation and the motivation to seek success, males are much more motivated than women. One important determining aspect is one’s own state of health. All motivation characteristics show significant differences between sick and non-sick college students (p < 0.001), with the biggest impact size on the motivation to avoid failure (Cohen’s d = 0.263). In the meantime, college students’ motivation to seek success and overall achievement motivation was also significantly impacted by their parental health condition, with a moderate effect size (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d > 0.139). When it comes to goal-setting, well-defined short-term plans significantly improve all aspects of achievement motivation (p < 0.001), whereas future goals only significantly affect the motivation to seek success and the overall achievement motivation; they have no significant effect on the motivation to avoid failure.
It is important to note that while parents’ literacy level and family annual income exhibit statistical significance in some dimensions (p < 0.05), their effect size indicators (η2 < 0.01) show that these factors’ actual explanatory power for the variation in achievement motivation is relatively limited. On the other hand, achievement motivation did not significantly alter depending on parameters like age, family structure, or monthly living expenses. This implies that we should focus more on goal-oriented advice, psychological support, and individual health management in the intervention strategies to improve college students’ accomplishment motivation. Table 6 provides specific information on the pertinent facts.
Table 6. Analysis of variance in achievement motivation for general demographic information.
3.6 Multiple linear regression analysis
Achievement motivation was designated as the dependent variable in this investigation. A multiple linear regression model was created using all the variables that demonstrated statistical significance (p < 0.05) in the univariate analysis, including gender, parental literacy level, personal health condition, parental health condition, family annual income, future goals, and short-term plans. Gender, personal health condition, and short-term plans emerged as significant predictors of college students’ achievement motivation after adjusting for other demographic characteristics, according to the multiple linear regression analysis results (see Table 6). In particular, female students showed considerably lower levels of achievement motivation than male students (β = −0.132, p < 0.001). In a similar vein, pupils who reported illness showed considerably less achievement motivation than those who did not (β = −0.064, p < 0.001). With regard to short-term plans, using “no goals for the time being” as the reference category, the following categories were found to positively predict achievement motivation: “strive to complete studies and obtain scholarships” (β = 0.082, p < 0.001), “participate in clubs or non-professional projects” (β = 0.087, p < 0.001), “take part in professional competitions” (β = 0.042, p < 0.05), and “other” plans (β = 0.145, p < 0.001). In contrast, “running for class committee” was associated with a significant negative predictive effect (β = −0.103, p < 0.001). According to these results, college students’ achievement motivation can be significantly increased by male gender, good health, and having positive short-term plans (such as running for class council, finishing school to receive a scholarship, or participating in clubs or non-professional programs). On the other hand, being female, being ill, and having the short-term plan of “avoiding course failure” are risk factors for achievement motivation and may have a detrimental effect on it.
Notably, when included in the multivariate regression model, variables like paternal literacy level, parental health condition, family annual income, and future goals did not show significant predictive effects compared to the single-factor analysis results. Only the “junior high school” category showed a slightly favorable predictive effect when compared to the reference group of “primary school or below” in terms of Mother’s literacy level (For more information, see Table 7).
Table 7. Multifactor analysis of achievement motivation among college studentsa.
4 Discussion
4.1 The current situation of achievement motivation
This study discovered that the general distribution of achievement motivation levels among university students is skewed, with significant inherent differentiation. This discovery is consistent with earlier research (Elliot et al., 2017; Spurk et al., 2020). The underlying causes of such inequalities are complicated and may be the consequence of a combination of factors such as individual characteristics, family environment, educational background, and social expectations (Howard et al., 2021). Furthermore, the phenomenon of differentiation in achievement motivation suggests that we should pay more attention to individual differences and implement targeted measures to stimulate students’ intrinsic motivation, assisting them in developing a positive achievement orientation and coping strategies. Students with a positive achievement motivation should be given assistance to retain their drive. For students with low achievement motivation or a dominant inclination to avoid failure, targeted assistance should include psychological therapy, goal reconstruction, and successful experiences. Future study should move beyond the broad pursuit of motivational levels and instead concentrate on the specific identification of discrete achievement motivation groups and their influencing elements, allowing for the creation of customized intervention strategies.
4.2 Influencing factors of achievement motivation
4.2.1 Personal level
According to this study, accomplishment motivation is highly correlated with individual characteristics like gender and health. Significant gender variations in achievement motivation were revealed by the questionnaire survey results. Male students were more competitive and goal-oriented, whereas female students were more risk-averse and sensitive to failure. These findings are consistent with those of Kaura and Sharma (2015), who discovered that gender had a substantial impact on accomplishment motivation, potentially as a result of conventional social and cultural gender norms (Borgonovi and Han, 2021; Maheswari and Aruna, 2016). In particular, boys are typically expected to be more socially responsible and to be under more pressure to compete. Boys are raised to be the “backbone” of the family from an early age and are encouraged to take part in challenges and competitions due to parental attitudes. They are more motivated to succeed and feel more achievement motivation overall as a result of this type of upbringing (Yu et al., 2021; Hines, 2020). On the other hand, girls are more likely to be required to do household duties like childrearing and housekeeping, which may lessen their achievement motivation. This could lessen their drive to attain great achievement and make it simpler for them to put in a lot of effort to reach their own objectives (Guan et al., 2023).
Gender roles develop later in life, despite the fact that sex-related physical traits are intrinsic. Individuals’ achievement motivation can be effectively increased by understanding gender disparities, strengthening the positive aspects of gender roles, improving the development of health courses, and incorporating well-defined objectives, prompt feedback, and a supportive environment of short-term plans (Kavousipour et al., 2015). In schools, gender education should be customized to meet the needs of individual students. Gender education should be tailored to each student’s requirements in schools. To help girls overcome social restraints and prejudices, schools could, for instance, invite “successful women” and other well-known individuals to conduct special lectures. This would encourage their drive to succeed and enable them to pursue self-improvement without being constrained by conventional gender norms. Parents ought to reconsider gender-specific schooling and focus more on their kids’ individuality. In the new era, they should be democratic parents and encourage their kids to actively explore.
Achievement motivation is significantly impacted by health, which is a crucial aspect of college students’ overall quality (Mahdavi et al., 2023). In agreeing with the findings of Andersen et al. (2016), this study discovered that healthy college students typically have higher achievement motivation. Healthy college students are able to spend more time and energy to achievement-related activities like studying, conducting research, and engaging in social events. This increases their achievement motivation (Merkt and Gawrilow, 2016). College students with health issues, on the other hand, could be self-conscious and lack confidence, which lowers their achievement motivation (Medlicott et al., 2021). As a result, schools ought to prioritize the health of their kids. They can support students in maintaining a healthy physical and mental state and increase their drive for success by providing mental health education courses and planning physical exercise activities. At the same time, parents should respect their children’s individuality and viewpoints, give them all the attention and support they need, and cultivate a cozy, peaceful, and democratic home environment. Children will be more self-assured and driven to achieve their goals when they experience the love and support of their family (Li et al., 2022; Meng et al., 2025).
4.2.2 Family and school level
Multiple types of short-term goals have distinct effects on achieving motivation, according to research. Achievement motivation is significantly positively predicted by goals that center on developing one’s own skills and pursuing personal interests (e.g., “striving for scholarships,” “participating in clubs or non-professional projects,” “taking part in professional competitions”). Nonetheless, there is a strong negative predictive effect in the “election for class committee positions” with considerable social hazards and assessment pressure (Atkinson, 1957; McClelland et al., 1953). This finding highlights the impact of target content attributes on motivation. While performance objectives that highlight social assessment may trigger students’ need to avoid failure, so impeding the development of their achievement motivation, mastery goals that emphasize ability growth can effectively boost achievement motivation (Ryan and Deci, 2000; Bögels and Mansell, 2004; Chen and Shi, 2015). As a result, schools should intentionally encourage students to concentrate on their own personal development and develop a goal-oriented mindset that is focused on gaining knowledge and skills during the academic coaching process.
4.2.3 Social level
The findings demonstrate that college students’ overall accomplishment motivation and its two aspects are significantly impacted by the family income level, which is a crucial indicator of the family’s socioeconomic standing. In particular, compared to their classmates from middle-income (50,000–150,000 yuan) and low-income (<50,000 yuan) homes, students from families with an annual income surpassing 150,000 yuan exhibit noticeably greater levels of motivation to seek success and overall achievement motivation. This result is in line with earlier international research (Adsul et al., 2008; Sommet et al., 2019). This conclusion, however, is at odds with Zeng et al.’s findings, which suggested that “poverty may enhance achievement motivation.” The following are the primary causes of this discrepancy: First, a significant contributing factor to the disparate outcomes could be the heterogeneity in research samples. Zeng et al.’s research subjects comprised university students from low-income families who had passed the Federal Grant Scheme review. This cohort exhibits strong positive selectivity, indicating that low-income university students inherently possess robust motivation for success. Our research sample also included ordinary undergraduates from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds who had not undergone similar selection processes. Family socioeconomic status exerted a more direct and significant influence on achievement motivation. Shandong, renowned as the ‘hometown of Confucius and Mencius, the land of learning,’ exhibits a strong awareness of investment in family education, particularly pronounced among high-income households. High-income families are more inclined to convert their financial resources into educational capital for their kids through foreign exchanges, quality growth, and after-school tutoring. Students’ self-efficacy and sense of success are greatly increased by these investments, which increases their achievement motivation (Hill, 2021). In contrast (Wang et al., 2021), students from poor families have a significantly higher motivation to avoid failure than those from high-income families. This might be because students from poor families face more economic pressure and uncertainty, and are more sensitive to stress, leading them to be more inclined to avoid risks and the negative impacts brought about by failure. Finally, different types of schools also vary in terms of educational objectives, teaching methods, etc., which will also have an impact on students’ achievement motivation. Therefore, the higher motivation of high-income students shows the ongoing good impact of family resources on motivation from middle school to college, while the higher motivation of poor students may be the psychological resilience effect during the college stage. The two show the situational and phased variations in the development of achievement motivation rather than being incompatible (Dweck and Leggett, 1988).
We suggest the following diversified family support strategies based on the results of this study, which are adapted to different socioeconomic circumstances (Mistry and Elenbaas, 2021). In particular, low-income families should place a high priority on offering their kids emotional support and encouragement in order to help them set positive objectives for their lives and lessen any negative feelings that can result from financial hardship. It is recommended that middle-class families concentrate on building their kids’ resilience and teaching them to keep a positive attitude when facing challenges in their academic and professional endeavors. In high-income households, it is essential to avoid imposing excessive academic or achievement pressure, allowing greater autonomy in personal development while prioritizing their psychological and physical well-being. By implementing such tailored approaches, it is possible to better address the distinct needs of students from diverse family income and facilitate their holistic development (Shabnam, 2025).
This study discovered that the direct impacts of variables like parents’ literacy level and family annual income on achievement motivation were no longer significant after adjusting for other variables. This finding is in line with earlier research’s conclusion that, as the primary component of family socioeconomic status, the influence of parents’ literacy level and family annual income typically has an indirect impact on achievement motivation through mediating factors (Tan et al., 2021). According to study by Caprara et al. (2008), students’ desire for achievement might be impacted by their family’s financial level through their feeling of self-efficacy. The direct impact of family socioeconomic status considerably diminishes after adjusting for self-efficacy. In particular, children from families with higher socioeconomic standing typically have greater access to resources, successful experiences, and role models, which helps them develop a stronger feeling of self-efficacy. One of the most direct motivators for accomplishment is self-efficacy. Parenting practices have also been shown to be a significant mediating factor in addition to self-efficacy (Su et al., 2015). In general, democratic and independent parenting approaches are more common among parents with greater education and less financial strain. This kind of positive parenting style can not only directly motivate individuals to pursue success, but also indirectly enhance their achievement motivation by promoting the development of their self-regulation ability and executive function (Luo et al., 2023). Furthermore, Haimovitz and Dweck (2017) research demonstrates that how parents perceive and respond to failure, whether as a learning opportunity or based on ability, has a substantial impact on their children’s thinking patterns. Parents with a high level of education are more likely to communicate a “growth mindset,” which indirectly boosts their children’s achievement motivation. Finally, family income and parents’ literacy level influence achievement motivation through a variety of mediating variables. Future study should investigate additional mediating variables and their mechanisms in order to acquire a more complete knowledge of the complicated relationship between family socioeconomic status and achievement motivation. In order to achieve more targeted and successful intervention, the function of these mediating variables should be thoroughly considered when developing educational policy and family support methods.
4.3 Limitations and future directions
Despite the fact that this study offers insightful information about the current state of college students’ achievement motivation and the elements that influence it, there are still a number of limitations that also indicate the route for future research. First, this study used cross-sectional survey data for its research design. It is challenging to determine the causal linkages between variables, even though it can show their associations. In order to better describe the temporal and causal relationships between individual traits, short-term plans, health conditions, and achievement motivation levels, future research should use longitudinal designs to monitor the dynamic trajectory of students’ achievement motivation from enrollment to graduation. Second, in terms of sample sources, the study’s data is focused in one area, and the samples’ representativeness is restricted, which somewhat compromises the research findings’ external validity. Future studies should perform multi-level and cross-regional comparative analyses, broaden the sample sources, and include students from other fields, geographies, and cultural backgrounds. Finally, while this study revealed several mediating processes when investigating the influence of characteristics such as family annual income and parental educational level on success motivation, more in-depth research and extension are required. Future research should use more rigorous research methodologies, delve further into the interaction paths and mediating mechanisms between distinct variables, and develop a more systematic knowledge of their overall influence patterns.
5 Conclusion
This study employs empirical analysis to demonstrate how the drive for achievement among college students varies greatly on an individual basis and is generally distributed unevenly. It provides theoretical underpinnings and practical insights for the research of achievement motivation by confirming that factors such as gender, health, and short-term plans have a significant impact on it. This study departs from the traditional approach of focusing just on the overall level of achievement motivation at the theoretical level. By revealing the internal differentiation characteristics of achievement motivation, it offers a new perspective on this matter and suggests that future theories should place greater emphasis on group heterogeneity. This study offers specific recommendations for higher education practitioners. In order to more effectively boost students’ achievement motivation and consequently improve both academic accomplishment and career development, institutions may create personalized instructional strategies based on specific student characteristics, such as gender, health condition, and short-term plans. Future studies may also use longitudinal tracking designs to investigate the developmental trajectories of achievement motivation, test the cross-regional applicability of the model through multi-regional and multi-institutional comparisons, and use more advanced modeling to investigate possible mediating mechanisms of achievement motivation. This would make it possible to create a developmental model of achievement motivation that is more actionable and explanatory, giving higher education practice a more thorough and scientific theoretical basis.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Research Ethics Committee of Jining Medical University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
SD: Data curation, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Investigation, Software. YJ: Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Writing – original draft. XN: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Methodology. JW: Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. WY: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. WZ: Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. HS: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. HX: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the participants who contributed to our study.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1636209/full#supplementary-material
References
Adsul, R., Kamble, V., and Sangli, K. (2008). Achievement motivation as a function of gender, economic background and caste differences in college students. J. Indian Acad. Appl. Psychol. 34, 323–327. doi: 10.1037/h0090092
Andersen, M. P., Mortensen, R. N., Vardinghus-Nielsen, H., Franch, J., Torp-Pedersen, C., and Bøggild, H. (2016). Association between physical fitness and academic achievement in a cohort of Danish school pupils. J. Sch. Health 86, 686–695. doi: 10.1111/josh.12423,
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychol. Rev. 64, 359–372. doi: 10.1037/h0043445,
Bögels, S. M., and Mansell, W. (2004). Attention processes in the maintenance and treatment of social phobia: hypervigilance, avoidance and self-focused attention. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 24, 827–856. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.06.005,
Borgonovi, F., and Han, S. W. (2021). Gender disparities in fear of failure among 15-year-old students: the role of gender inequality, the organisation of schooling and economic conditions. J. Adolesc. 86, 28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.12.006,
Brunstein, J. C., and Heckhausen, H. (2025). “Achievement motivation” in Motivation and action. eds. J. Heckhausen and H. Heckhausen (Cham, Switzerland: Springer), 227–312.
Butera, F., Dompnier, B., and Darnon, C. (2024). Achievement goals: a social influence cycle. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 75, 527–554. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230,
Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., et al. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 100, 525–534. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.525
Chen, Y., and Shi, L. (2015). The relationship between college students' competitive attitude and achievement motivation: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Psychol. Dev. Educ. 31, 188–195. doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.02.10
Cheung, G. W., and Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Daumiller, M., and Zarrinabadi, N. (2021). My goal is to do the best that I can in this class: relevance of potential-based achievement goals for intrinsic motivation and course performance. Int. J. Psychol. 56, 934–940. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12771,
Deng, W. G., Li, X. Y., Chen, B., Luo, K., and Zeng, X. Y. (2018). The current situation of common method bias test in domestic psychology literature. J Jiangxi Normal Univ 42, 447–453. doi: 10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2018.05.02
Dweck, C. S., and Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol. Rev. 95, 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Ehrlich, C., and Bipp, T. (2016). Goals and subjective well-being: further evidence for goal-striving reasons as an additional level of goal analysis. Pers. Individ. Differ. 89, 92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.003
Elliot, A. J., Dweck, C. S., and Yeager, D. S. (2017). Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application. 2nd Edn. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Publications.
Elliot, A. J., and Sommet, N. (2023). Integration in the achievement motivation literature and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 35:77. doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09788-4
Fan, W., and Zhang, L. F. (2009). Are achievement motivation and thinking styles related? A visit among Chinese university students. Learn. Individ. Differ. 19, 299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.007
Guan, J., Xiang, P., Land, W., and Hamilton, X. D. (2023). Age and gender differences in achievement goal orientations in relation to physical activity. Percept. Mot. Skills 130, 80–93. doi: 10.1177/00315125221142761,
Haimovitz, K., and Dweck, C. S. (2017). The origins of children's growth and fixed mindsets: new research and a new proposal. Child Dev. 88, 1849–1859. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12955,
Hermans, H. J. (1970). A questionnaire measure of achievement motivation. J. Appl. Psychol. 54, 353–363. doi: 10.1037/h0029678,
Hill, H. D. (2021). Family income level, variability, and trend as predictors of child achievement and behavior. Demography 58, 1499–1524. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9373618,
Hines, M. (2020). Human gender development. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 118, 89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.018,
Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., and Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: a meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 1300–1323. doi: 10.1177/1745691620966789,
Kaura, N., and Sharma, R. (2015). The effect of gender on achievement motivation. Indian J. Health Wellbeing 6, 450–453. doi: 10.5958/2229-5356.2015.00058.3
Kavousipour, S., Noorafshan, A., Pourahmad, S., and Dehghani-Nazhvani, A. (2015). Achievement motivation level in students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and its influential factors. J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof. 3, 26–32. doi: 10.5681/jamp.2015.005,
Li, N., Li, Y., Huang, X., Xiang, S., Hu, Q., Luo, C., et al. (2022). The role of achievement attribution in the associations between parent-child communication and psychological well-being among adolescents: a mediation analysis. Eur. Psychiatry 65:e52. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2311
Lu, H., Hou, J., Wang, J., and Kong, F. (2024). Antidote or poison: the relationship between lying flat tendency and mental health. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 16, 1757–1777. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12538,
Luo, Y., Zhang, L., Zhou, J., Li, Y., and Liu, C. (2023). The effect of family socioeconomic status on child executive function: the mediating role of parental rearing behaviors. Early Child Res. Q. 63, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.01.001
Mahdavi, P., Valibeygi, A., Moradi, M., and Sadeghi, S. (2023). Relationship between achievement motivation, mental health and academic success in university students. Community Health Equity Res. Policy 43, 311–317. doi: 10.1177/0272684X211058627,
Maheswari, K. K., and Aruna, M. (2016). Gender difference and achievement motivation among adolescent school students. Int. J. Appl. Res. 2, 149–152. doi: 10.22271/allresearch.2016.v2.i3.6625
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., and Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York, NY, USA: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Medlicott, E., Phillips, A., Crane, C., Hinze, V., Taylor, L., Tickell, A., et al. (2021). The mental health and wellbeing of university students: acceptability, effectiveness, and mechanisms of a mindfulness-based course. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:6023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116023,
Meng, F., Cheng, C., Xie, Y., Li, X., and Liang, J. (2025). Relationships between co-parenting patterns and achievement motives in Chinese junior high school adolescents: a latent profile analysis. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 169:108002. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108002
Merkt, J., and Gawrilow, C. (2016). Health, dietary habits, and achievement motivation in college students with self-reported ADHD diagnosis. J. Atten. Disord. 20, 727–740. doi: 10.1177/1087054714527795,
Michou, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Mouratidis, A., and Lens, W. (2014). Enriching the hierarchical model of achievement motivation: autonomous and controlling reasons underlying achievement goals. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 84, 650–666. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12055,
Mistry, R. S., and Elenbaas, L. (2021). It's all in the family: parents' economic worries and youth's perceptions of financial stress and educational outcomes. J. Youth Adolesc. 50, 724–738. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01416-0,
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879,
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68,
Shabnam, S. (2025). Influence of family structure on achievement-motivation: discovering the scenario of Bangladeshi public university students. European Journal of Human and Social Sciences 5, 1–4. doi: 10.24018/ejsocial.2025.5.2.474
Shang, C., Moss, A. C., and Chen, A. (2023). The expectancy-value theory: a meta-analysis of its application in physical education. J. Sport Health Sci. 12, 52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2022.11.003,
Sommet, N., Elliot, A. J., Jamieson, J. P., and Butera, F. (2019). Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach-avoidance motivation. J. Pers. 87, 767–784. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12432,
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., and Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: a review and "how to" guide of its application within vocational behavior research. J. Vocat. Behav. 120:103445. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
Su, X., and Dong, Z. H. (2015). Relationship between parental rearing behavior and career adaptability of college students: the mediating role of achievement motivation. Chin. J. Clin. Psychol. 23, 174–177. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.01.040
Tan, T. X., Wang, C., Cheng, K. M., Li, B., and Zhang, S. (2021). Family socioeconomic status and Chinese children's academic achievement: the mediating roles of parental involvement and parenting styles. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 120:105781. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105781,
Tan, D. D., and Yun, Z. L. (2020). Statistical approaches for testing common method bias: problems and suggestions. J. Psychol. Sci. 43, 215–223. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200130
Wang, D., Guo, D., Song, C., Hao, L., and Qiao, Z. (2021). General self-efficacy and employability among financially underprivileged Chinese college students: the mediating role of achievement motivation and career aspirations. Front. Psychol. 12:719771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719771,
Yang, J., and Jiang, Y. Y. (2010). Analysis of achievement motivation and its influencing factors among college students. Peking Univ. Educ. Rev. 8, 63–69. doi: 10.19355/j.cnki.1671-9468.2010.01.007
Ye, R. M., and Kh, H. (1992). Measurement and analysis of achievement motivation. Psychol. Dev. Educ. 1992, 14–16.
Yu, J., McLellan, R., and Winter, L. (2021). Which boys and which girls are falling behind? Linking adolescents' gender role profiles to motivation, engagement, and achievement. J. Youth Adolesc. 50, 336–352. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01324-9,
Keywords: achievement motivation, college students, current status, empirical analysis, influencing factors
Citation: Dang S, Jin Y, Niu X, Wang J, Yu W, Zhou W, Sun H and Xie H (2025) Analysis of the current situation of college students’ achievement motivation and influencing factors—an empirical analysis based on a college in Shandong Province. Front. Psychol. 16:1636209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1636209
Edited by:
Henri Tilga, University of Tartu, EstoniaReviewed by:
Jianda Kong, Qufu Normal University, ChinaSong Tu, Capital Normal University, China
Juan Diego Davila Cisneros, National University Pedro Ruiz Gallo, Peru
Copyright © 2025 Dang, Jin, Niu, Wang, Yu, Zhou, Sun and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hui Xie, MTc3NjMzNzY2NkBxcS5jb20=; Hao Sun, ODcyNzk1OTA2QHFxLmNvbQ==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work