Abstract
Since the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the global healthcare community has faced the challenge of understanding and addressing the ongoing and multi-faceted SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes. As millions of individuals worldwide continue to navigate the complexities of post-hospitalization recovery, reinfection rates, and the increasing prevalence of Long-COVID symptoms, comprehensive COVID-19 rehabilitation strategies are greatly needed. Previous studies have highlighted the potential synergy between exercise and nutrition, suggesting that their integration into patient rehabilitation programs may yield improved clinical outcomes for survivors of COVID-19. Our group aimed to consolidate existing knowledge following the implementation of patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) search strategies on the distinct and combined impacts of exercise and nutrition interventions in facilitating the recovery of COVID-19 patients following hospitalization, with a specific focus on their implications for both public health and clinical practice. The incorporation of targeted nutritional strategies alongside exercise-based programs may expedite patient recovery, ultimately promoting independence in performing activities of daily living (ADLs). Nonetheless, an imperative for expanded scientific inquiry remains, particularly in the realm of combined interventions. This mini-review underscores the compelling prospects offered by an amalgamated approach, advocating for the seamless integration of exercise and nutrition as integral components of post-hospitalization COVID-19 rehabilitation. The pursuit of a comprehensive understanding of the synergistic effects and effectiveness of exercise and nutrition stands as a crucial objective in advancing patient care and refining recovery strategies in the wake of this enduring global health crisis.
1. Introduction
Since initial cases were identified in November 2019, the global healthcare community has contended with the relentless challenge posed by the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (1). By some reports, COVID-19 has become endemic (2), however, recent statistics paint a sobering picture. Approximately 4.5 million new cases and 32,000 deaths occurred between February 6th and March 5th, 2023 (3). As of March 5th, 2023, a staggering 759 million confirmed cases and 6.8 million deaths have been reported worldwide, emphasizing the enduring need for public health and medical interventions (3). As COVID-19 transitions into an endemic disease, the inevitable consequence of a growing survivor population has become apparent.
An increasing number of adults, regardless of vaccination status, have been contending with an array of lingering symptoms and post-acute conditions collectively known as post-COVID conditions, long-haul COVID, or more commonly noted as long-term COVID (4); more so in older adults, ages 65 and older (5). While symptom severity varies, most patients encounter the triad of coughing, fever, and fatigue, often accompanied by anosmia, headaches, myalgia, congestion, rhinorrhea, dyspnea, vomiting, or diarrhea, which may worsen a week or more after onset (6). Persistent symptoms lasting longer than four weeks following diagnosis, and some suffering effects for greater than two years have been reported (7). While some COVID-based physical rehabilitation studies exist to address these issues, to our knowledge, no studies have examined the implementation of exercise and nutritional interventions in a COVID rehabilitation model. Thus, the purposes of this mini-review were: (1) to evaluate and synthesize existing knowledge regarding the pivotal role of exercise or nutritional interventions for COVID patients, and (2) to propose COVID rehabilitation modeling which includes a combination of exercise and nutritional interventions aimed at optimal recovery, physical well-being, and improved quality of life (QOL). Search strategies employed by our group followed the patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) model (Supplementary Table S1) (8).
2. Impact of COVID-19 on patients’ health and significance of rehabilitation
Hospitalized or recovering patients may experience substantial mental health challenges directly from the disease, which often overlap with physical challenges, and then contribute to the overall complexity of psychological well-being (9, 10). Hospitalization, isolation, and uncertainty in severe illness can precipitate mental health challenges or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-like symptoms (11–13), cognitive disorders, memory lapses, and difficulties in concentrating (14). Immunological dysregulation (15), ongoing inflammatory conditions (16, 17), and organ system dysfunction have been linked to symptom persistence (18). Persistent anxiety and depression may result from the uncertainties surrounding the illness, isolation, and exposure to illness and mortality (19). Cognitive challenges, described as brain fog, may further complicate recovery (20). Rehabilitation for patients who continue to experience lingering symptoms is paramount as it may vitally impact the recovery process by improving outcomes, reducing complications, and enhancing overall QOL (21). Muscle weakness, decreased mobility, and reduced functional capacity have been highlighted as a consequence of prolonged bed rest and the catabolic effects of the virus (22). Persistent fatigue further exacerbates the challenges faced by patients, hampering their ability to engage in daily activities and threatening overall QOL (23, 24). Additionally, the virus's potential to influence the development of novel health conditions, such as metabolic and cardiovascular issues, adds another layer of complexity to the rehabilitation process (25). The Stanford-Hall consensus statement for post-COVID rehabilitation, while initially targeting active individuals, has provided a valuable rehabilitative framework for addressing the major health challenges faced by COVID-19 patients (25). However, nutritional interventions were notably absent from this consensus, leaving an important aspect of recovery unaddressed.
3. Exercise in COVID-19 rehabilitation
Human movement, whether by physical activity or exercise, has been long established in the literature for the wide array of health benefits and for the reduction of risks of developing chronic health disorders or disease states. Ruegsegger and Booth (2018), in a review of the literature, reported that lifelong exercise is associated with the delayed onset of approximately 40 different diseases in addition to the extenuation of lifespan (26). Numerous studies have demonstrated improvements in cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory function (27–29), improvements in mental health and QOL (30–34), and improvements in blood parameters, mitochondrial function, and metabolic conditions (35–38).
Contemporary rehabilitation strategies have been developed and implemented for large-scale health conditions such as cancer and cardiovascular disease according to phase-based standard-of-care models (39, 40). Both follow progressively similar trajectories often initiating in the in-patient setting to address medical or surgical issues with goals of referring patients toward prescriptive out-patient rehabilitation programs. Assessment and screening procedures guide patient allocation toward addressing specific needs of symptom reduction and improvements in functional capacity. Then, as patient progress and physiological improvement occurs, exercise interventions advance through additional phase increases resulting in an individual maintaining healthy active living and independence at the completion of the final phase (41). Comparitively, phase-based cancer rehabilitation modeling may be more appropriate because of the greater expectance of a wide array of known cancer treatment-related side effects such as chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment, balance and coordination disorders, fatigue, muscle and joint pain, depression, reductions in QOL, urinary or gastrointestinal disorders, thrombocytoppenia, integumentary system disorders, neuropathic conditions, cardiorespiratory conditions, fertility issues, and edema (42, 43).
4. Nutrition in COVID-19 rehabilitation
Infection susceptibility and advanced disease severity have been linked to a number of risk factors including male gender, advanced age, obesity, type-II diabetes diagnoses, poor diet, under-represented population groups, and pro-inflammatory conditions (44, 45). Butler and Barrientos (2020) suggested that highly processed diets composed of high fat and carbohydrate content, low fiber foods may play a significant role in not only association with risk factors but also with negative impacts on innate and adaptive immunological function (46). Excessive dietary sodium and alcohol in addition to deficiencies in vitamin D may also negatively predispose an individual to be at greater risk for infection and greater severity of the disease (47). Yet, Downer, Berkowitz, Harlan, Olstad, and Mozaffarian, et al. (2020) suggest that targeted nutritional interventions have a significant role in the treatment, prevention, management, and reversal of some diseases (48). As it relates directly to COVID-19, Tsagari, Risvas, Papathanasiou, and Dionyssiotis (2022) specifically noted that patients are more prone to sarcopenia and malnutrition due to multiple nutritional and metabolic factors that may result in decreases in immune function, decreases in respiratory and swallowing function, and reductions in resilience to metabolic stress. Yet, a consensus would indicate that obtaining macro- and micronutrients in proper concentrations is conducive to overall health and well-being (49).
5. The synergy of exercise and nutrition
Adequate nutrition necessary for healthy human function has been demonstrated to support immunological function, organ health, and functioning, prolong lifespans, and decrease risks for diseases such as diabetes and some cancers (50). In addition to the benefits of exercise during patient rehabilitation, adequate nutrition complements positive outcomes and provides potential synergistic strength when they are utilized in combination (Table 1). Given the abundance of evidence supporting the positive impacts of exercise or nutrition alone, the combined exercise and nutrition theoretical construct synergizes both for potentially additive effects. Yet, research is often convoluted and challenging to conduct because of the many different factors presented herein. Thus, our group strongly advocates for increased research in this area with the hopes that ultimately, these investigative efforts may lead to wide-scale development and implementation of standardized exercise and nutrition programs that are targeted toward the individual needs of patients recovering from COVID-19.
Table 1
| Rehabilitation Benefit | Importance in Patient Rehabilitation | References |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise | ||
| Respiratory function | Helps strengthen the respiratory muscles and improve lung capacity | (40, 51) |
| Muscle strength and mobility | Prevents muscle atrophy and enhances muscle strength and mobility | (22, 51) |
| Cardiovascular health | Contributes to better cardiovascular health and reduces the risk of heart-related complications | (36, 40, 52) |
| Mental health | Releases endorphins, which can alleviate symptoms of anxiety and depression | (31, 34, 53) |
| Weight management | Reduces the risk of complications in individuals with obesity-related comorbidities | (44, 54) |
| Balance and coordination | Helps regain stability and reduce the risk of falls in high-risk patients. | (22, 51) |
| Nutrition | ||
| Immune support | Provides essential nutrients that bolster the immune system, aiding in the body's ability to fight infections | (16, 46, 49, 50, 55) |
| Tissue repair and healing | Supports tissue repair and healing processes, aiding in the recovery from the physical impact of the disease | (56, 57) |
| Energy and strength | Provides energy for daily activities, and rehabilitation exercises, and prevents muscle wasting and fatigue | (50, 56, 57) |
| Bone health | Adequate calcium and vitamin D intake contribute to bone strength and can aid in the healing process | (49, 50, 57) |
| Inflammation | Reduces systemic inflammation and contributes to lower disease-related complications | (16, 49, 56, 57) |
| Mental health | Supports cognitive function and emotional health during the post-disease recovery period | (49, 58) |
| Combined Exercise and Nutrition | ||
| Muscle preservation and growth | Help preserve existing muscle mass and promote the development of lean muscle tissue. Resistance training stimulates muscle protein synthesis. Protein intake provides the necessary building blocks for muscle repair and growth. | (40, 51, 56) |
| Exercise performance | Lead to more effective workouts and greater gains in strength and mobility. Carbohydrate intake provides the energy required for physical activity. Consuming the right nutrients before and after exercise can help perform better during rehabilitation sessions. | (51, 52, 56) |
| Enhanced recovery | Nutrients including vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants aid in tissue repair and reduce inflammation. When combined with appropriate exercise, these nutrients support an accelerated healing and recovery process. | (40, 51, 52, 56) |
| Immune function | Regular exercise can temporarily suppress the immune system. A well-balanced diet supports immune responses, helping the body fight off infections, including those that can interfere with rehabilitation. | (21, 51, 55, 56) |
| Weight management | Exercise increases energy expenditure, while proper nutrition helps control calorie intake. They create an energy balance that can support weight loss, weight maintenance, or healthy weight gain. | (21, 44, 54, 56) |
| Mental health | Promote overall mental health and well-being during rehabilitation and recovery. Exercise reduces stress and improves mood. Foods rich in omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants can have a positive impact on mood and cognitive function. | (13, 34, 53, 58) |
| Risk of comorbidities | Address underlying patient health conditions and comorbidities these conditions, reducing the risk of complications and promoting better overall health. | (21, 40, 52, 56, 59) |
| Nutrient utilization | Improve nutrient utilization and contribute to better overall health and recovery. Exercise increases the body's demand for nutrients. Nutrients are more efficiently utilized to support recovery during rehabilitation. | (49, 51, 56) |
| Patient compliance | When patients see positive results from their rehabilitation efforts, they are more likely to stay motivated and adhere to their exercise and nutrition plans. The synergy between exercise and nutrition can lead to faster improvements, boosting patient confidence and compliance. | (21, 51, 56) |
| Quality of life | Exercise and nutrition contribute to an improved quality of life by enhancing physical and mental health, reducing symptoms, and increasing patients’ functional capacity. | (14, 20, 30, 33, 51, 56) |
Benefits of exercise, nutrition, and their synergistic effects during patient rehabilitation and recovery.
Patient education on diet and exercise may also substantially impact COVID-19 rehabilitation by accelerating the return to functional capacity by empowering individuals to take an active role in their recovery. A combined holistic approach that integrates targeted exercise regimens with nutritional guidance may provide additional effectiveness. Nutritional interventions support the healing process, enhance energy levels, and aid in muscle recovery, complementing the benefits of physical rehabilitation (60). Emphasizing the importance of exercise and nutrition in rehabilitation, may reduce the long-term burdens of COVID-19 and help patients regain their independence and overall well-being.
6. Discussion
The implementation of combined exercise and nutritional interventions in a hospitalized setting for patients with COVID-19 presents with several challenges (Figure 1). COVID-19 not only affects the respiratory system but also leads to muscle weakness, deconditioning, and nutritional deficiencies due to prolonged illness and reduced food intake. Integrating exercise and nutrition therapies is crucial for addressing both the respiratory and musculoskeletal aspects of recovery. Such an approach not only enhances physical function but also supports mental and emotional well-being during the long recovery process. One significant obstacle is ensuring patient compliance, particularly in cases of severe illness or limited mobility. Patients may experience discomfort or fatigue, making it difficult to engage in exercise routines. Additionally, resource limitations in healthcare facilities, such as a shortage of qualified personnel, equipment, or dedicated spaces for exercise, can hinder program implementation. Overcoming these challenges requires a multifaceted approach with a multidisciplinary team who are trained and equipped to address this disease from the acute phase throughout active recovery and return to apparently healthy functional status. Clinical exercise physiologists, physiotherapists, dietitians, occupational therapists, and statisticians working alongside physicians, nurses, and specialists play essential roles in the assessment, development, monitoring, and in-depth analytical evaluations of programmatic implementation specifically targeting patient-specific needs and conditions throughout the continuum of care. Personalized expert guidance may increase the likelihood of intervention adherence.
Figure 1
As we continue to navigate the complex landscape of rehabilitation for hospitalized patients, especially those with COVID-19, there are promising avenues for future health education, research, and innovative methodologies to address disease risk, infection, hospitalization, recovery, and rehabilitation. Investigating the optimal timing and intensity of exercise interventions, along with personalized nutrition plans, can further improve patient outcomes. The integration of technology, such as telehealth platforms and wearable telemetric devices, may facilitate remote monitoring and enhance patient engagement. Moreover, research should explore the long-term effects of combined exercise and nutrition therapy on reducing the risk of readmission, improving overall quality of life, and addressing potential comorbidities associated with sarcopenia and malnutrition.
The successful implementation of exercise and nutrition programs in a hospital setting, particularly for patients recovering from severe illnesses like COVID-19, necessitates a comprehensive strategy. Overcoming patient compliance issues, and resource constraints, and ensuring a multidisciplinary approach are critical steps. Future research endeavors and innovative approaches should aim to refine these interventions, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and improved healthcare delivery.
Statements
Author contributions
BP: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. IU: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. SS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. J-YP: Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. JK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. RG: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JW: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. TG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2023.1305175/full#supplementary-material
References
1.
WHO. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). (2023). Available at:https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1
2.
BiancolellaMColonaVLMehrian-ShaiRWattJLLuzzattoLNovelliGet alCOVID-19 2022 update: transition of the pandemic to the endemic phase. Hum Genomics. (2022) 16(1):19. 10.1186/s40246-022-00392-1
3.
WHO. Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19. (2023). Available at:https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---8-march-2023
4.
SorianoJBMurthySMarshallJCRelanPDiazJV. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. (2022) 22(4):e102–e7. 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00703-9
5.
Mayo_Clinic. COVID-19: long-term effects. (2022). Available at:https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-long-term-effects/art-20490351
6.
SharmaAAhmad FaroukILalSK. COVID-19: a review on the novel coronavirus disease evolution, transmission, detection, control and prevention. Viruses. (2021) 13(2):202. 10.3390/v13020202
7.
ZareiMBoseDNouri-VaskehMTajikniaVZandRGhasemiM. Long-term side effects and lingering symptoms post COVID-19 recovery. Rev Med Virol. (2022) 32(3):e2289. 10.1002/rmv.2289
8.
SchardtCAdamsMBOwensTKeitzSFonteloP. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. (2007) 7(1):16. 10.1186/1472-6947-7-16
9.
PenninxBBenrosMEKleinRSVinkersCH. How COVID-19 shaped mental health: from infection to pandemic effects. Nat Med. (2022) 28(10):2027–37. 10.1038/s41591-022-02028-2
10.
GalbadageTPetersonBMWangDCWangJSGunasekeraRS. Biopsychosocial and spiritual implications of patients with COVID-19 dying in isolation. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:588623. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588623
11.
Cortés ZamoraEBMas RomeroMTabernero SahuquilloMTAvendaño CéspedesAAndrés-PetrelFGómez BallesterosCet alPsychological and functional impact of COVID-19 in long-term care facilities: the COVID-A study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2022) 30(4):431–43. 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.01.007
12.
WaleckaICiechanowiczPDopytalskaKMikucka-WituszyńskaASzymańskaEBoguckiJet alPsychological consequences of hospital isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic—research on the sample of Polish firefighting academy students. Curr Psychol. (2023) 42(8):6856–65. 10.1007/s12144-021-01982-3
13.
SerraRBorrazzoCVassaliniPDi NicolantonioCKoukopoulosAETosatoCet alPost-traumatic stress disorder trajectories the year after COVID-19 hospitalization. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19(14):8452. 10.3390/ijerph19148452
14.
CebanFLingSLuiLMWLeeYGillHTeopizKMet alFatigue and cognitive impairment in post-COVID-19 syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. (2022) 101:93–135. 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.020
15.
DavittEDavittCMazerMBAretiSSHotchkissRSRemyKE. COVID-19 disease and immune dysregulation. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. (2022) 35(3):101401. 10.1016/j.beha.2022.101401
16.
VollbrachtCKraftK. Oxidative stress and hyper-inflammation as major drivers of severe COVID-19 and long COVID: implications for the benefit of high-dose intravenous vitamin C. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:899198. 10.3389/fphar.2022.899198
17.
PierceJDShenQCintronSAHiebertJB. Post-COVID-19 syndrome. Nurs Res. (2022) 71(2):164–74. 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000565
18.
DennisACuthbertsonDJWoottonDCrooksMGabbayMEichertNet alMulti-organ impairment and long COVID: a 1-year prospective, longitudinal cohort study. J R Soc Med. (2023) 116(3):97–112. 10.1177/01410768231154703
19.
ShahSMAMohammadDQureshiMFHAbbasMZAleemS. Prevalence, psychological responses and associated correlates of depression, anxiety and stress in a global population, during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Community Ment Health J. (2021) 57(1):101–10. 10.1007/s10597-020-00728-y
20.
BeckerJHLinJJDoernbergMStoneKNavisAFestaJRet alAssessment of cognitive function in patients after COVID-19 infection. JAMA Network Open. (2021) 4(10):e2130645. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30645
21.
YuCHelwigEJ. Role of rehabilitation amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: a review. J Transl Med. (2021) 19(1):376. 10.1186/s12967-021-03048-1
22.
Sagarra-RomeroLViñas-BarrosA. COVID-19: short and long-term effects of hospitalization on muscular weakness in the elderly. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17(23):8715. 10.3390/ijerph17238715
23.
AyresJS. A metabolic handbook for the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Metab. (2020) 2(7):572–85. 10.1038/s42255-020-0237-2
24.
GuzikTJMohiddinSADimarcoAPatelVSavvatisKMarelli-BergFMet alCOVID-19 and the cardiovascular system: implications for risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options. Cardiovasc Res. (2020) 116(10):1666–87. 10.1093/cvr/cvaa106
25.
Barker-DaviesRMO’SullivanOSenaratneKPPBakerPCranleyMDharm-DattaSet alThe Stanford Hall consensus statement for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation. Br J Sports Med. (2020) 54(16):949–59. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102596
26.
RuegseggerGNBoothFW. Health benefits of exercise. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. (2018) 8(7):a029694. 10.1101/cshperspect.a029694
27.
Fiuza-LucesCGaratacheaNBergerNALuciaA. Exercise is the real polypill. Physiology. (2013) 28(5):330–58. 10.1152/physiol.00019.2013
28.
NystoriakMABhatnagarA. Cardiovascular effects and benefits of exercise. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2018) 5:135. 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00135
29.
TanasescuMLeitzmannMFRimmEBWillettWCStampferMJHuFB. Exercise type and intensity in relation to coronary heart disease in men. JAMA. (2002) 288(16):1994–2000. 10.1001/jama.288.16.1994
30.
DauwanMBegemannMJHSlotMIELeeEHMScheltensPSommerIEC. Physical exercise improves quality of life, depressive symptoms, and cognition across chronic brain disorders: a transdiagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol. (2021) 268(4):1222–46. 10.1007/s00415-019-09493-9
31.
FossatiCTorreGVastaSGiombiniAQuarantaFPapaliaRet alPhysical exercise and mental health: the routes of a reciprocal relation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18(23):12364. 10.3390/ijerph182312364
32.
GillDLHammondCCReifsteckEJJehuCMWilliamsRAAdamsMMet alPhysical activity and quality of life. J Prev Med Public Health. (2013) 46(Suppl 1):S28–34. 10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.S.S28
33.
MarquezDXAguiñagaSVásquezPMConroyDEEricksonKIHillmanCet alA systematic review of physical activity and quality of life and well-being. Transl Behav Med. (2020) 10(5):1098–109. 10.1093/tbm/ibz198
34.
PearceMGarciaLAbbasAStrainTSchuchFBGolubicRet alAssociation between physical activity and risk of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. (2022) 79(6):550–9. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0609
35.
MairbäurlH. Red blood cells in sports: effects of exercise and training on oxygen supply by red blood cells. Front Physiol. (2013) 4:332. 10.3389/fphys.2013.00332
36.
MyersJKokkinosPNyelinE. Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and the metabolic syndrome. Nutrients. (2019) 11(7):1652. 10.3390/nu11071652
37.
SorrientoDDi VaiaEIaccarinoG. Physical exercise: a novel tool to protect mitochondrial health. Front Physiol. (2021) 12:660068. 10.3389/fphys.2021.660068
38.
WardynGGRennardSIBrusnahanSKMcGuireTRCarlsonMLSmithLMet alEffects of exercise on hematological parameters, circulating side population cells, and cytokines. Exp Hematol. (2008) 36(2):216–23. 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.10.003
39.
BrownJMShackelfordDYKHippMLHaywardR. Evaluation of an exercise-based phase program as part of a standard care model for cancer survivors. Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. (2019) 4(7):45–54. 10.1249/TJX.0000000000000082
40.
TesslerJBordoniB. Cardiac rehabilitation. Statpearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC (2023).
41.
CDC. Long COVID or post-COVID Conditions: centers for disease control and prevention. (2023). Available at:https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects/index.html
42.
NCI. Side effects of cancer treatment: National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. (2023). Available at:https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/side-effects
43.
ACS. Managing cancer-related side effects: American Cancer Society. (2023). Available at:https://www.cancer.org/cancer/managing-cancer/side-effects.html
44.
SawadogoWTsegayeMGizawAAderaT. Overweight and obesity as risk factors for COVID-19-associated hospitalisations and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. (2022) 5(1):10–18. 10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000375
45.
ZhangJ-JDongXLiuG-HGaoY-D. Risk and protective factors for COVID-19 morbidity, severity, and mortality. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2023) 64(1):90–107. 10.1007/s12016-022-08921-5
46.
ButlerMJBarrientosRM. The impact of nutrition on COVID-19 susceptibility and long-term consequences. Brain Behav Immun. (2020) 87:53–4. 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.040
47.
Iaccarino IdelsonPRendinaDStrazzulloP. Nutrition and the COVID-19 pandemic: three factors with high impact on community health.Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2021) 31(3):756–61. 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.12.001
48.
DownerSBerkowitzSAHarlanTSOlstadDLMozaffarianD. Food is medicine: actions to integrate food and nutrition into healthcare. Br Med J. (2020) 369:m2482. 10.1136/bmj.m2482
49.
TsagariARisvasGPapathanasiouJVDionyssiotisY. Nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection during rehabilitation. J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. (2022) 7(2):88–94. 10.22540/JFSF-07-088
50.
CDC. Benefits of healthy eating. (2023). Available at:https://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/resources-publications/benefits-of-healthy-eating.html
51.
HockeleLFSachet AffonsoJVRossiDEibelB. Pulmonary and functional rehabilitation improves functional capacity, pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength in post COVID-19 patients: pilot clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19(22):14899. 10.3390/ijerph192214899
52.
CalabreseMGarofanoMPalumboRDi PietroPIzzoCDamatoAet alExercise training and cardiac rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular complications: state of art. Life (Basel). (2021) 11(3):259. 10.3390/life11030259
53.
PivaTMasottiSRaisiAZerbiniVGrazziGMazzoniGet alExercise program for the management of anxiety and depression in adults and elderly subjects: is it applicable to patients with post-COVID-19 condition? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2023) 325:273–81. 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.155
54.
De AmicisRCancelloRCapodaglioPGobbiMBrunaniAGilardiniLet alPatients with severe obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic: how to maintain an adequate multidisciplinary nutritional rehabilitation program?Obes Facts. (2021) 14(2):205–13. 10.1159/000513283
55.
AmanFMasoodS. How nutrition can help to fight against COVID-19 pandemic. Pak J Med Sci. (2020) 36(Covid19-s4):S121–S3. 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2776
56.
ShiradoKFurunoYKanamaruKKawabataNOkunoSYamashitaT. Effect of rehabilitation nutrition on a post-acute severe COVID-19 patient: a case report. Healthcare (Basel). (2021) 9(8):1034. 10.3390/healthcare9081034
57.
MoscatelliFSessaFValenzanoAPolitoRMondaVCibelliGet alCOVID-19: role of nutrition and supplementation. Nutrients. (2021) 13(3):976. 10.3390/nu13030976
58.
BarreaLGrantWBFrias-ToralEVetraniCVerdeLde AlteriisGet alDietary recommendations for post-COVID-19 syndrome. Nutrients. (2022) 14(6):1305. 10.3390/nu14061305
59.
Jimeno-AlmazánAPallarésJGBuendía-RomeroÁMartínez-CavaAFranco-LópezFSánchez-Alcaraz MartínezBJet alPost-COVID-19 syndrome and the potential benefits of exercise. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18(10):5329. 10.3390/ijerph18105329
60.
ToshikuniNArisawaTTsutsumiM. Nutrition and exercise in the management of liver cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. (2014) 20(23):7286–97. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7286
Summary
Keywords
COVID-19, exercise, nutrition, rehabilitation, intervention, Long-COVID, muscle strength, mental health
Citation
Peterson BM, Unger I, Sun S, Park J-Y, Kim J, Gunasekera RS, Wilson J and Galbadage T (2023) The vital role of exercise and nutrition in COVID-19 rehabilitation: synergizing strength. Front. Sports Act. Living 5:1305175. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1305175
Received
30 September 2023
Accepted
21 November 2023
Published
08 December 2023
Volume
5 - 2023
Edited by
Tácio Santos, University Center of Brasilia, Brazil
Reviewed by
Karl James New, University of South Wales, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Peterson, Unger, Sun, Park, Kim, Gunasekera, Wilson and Galbadage.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Brent M. Peterson brent.peterson@biola.edu Thushara Galbadage don.galbadage@biola.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.