Figure 3 of the article by Henry et al. (2015) contained a minor error, which we correct here.
Figure 3
Figure captions 4, 5, and 12 contained minor errors, which we correct here.
Figure 4. Song style of birds belonging to colonies of different sizes. Although the birds were recorded in very different conditions, a clear trend appeared toward an increase in whistling (hence discontinuous songs) and a decrease of warbling (hence continuous song) with increasing colony size (= number of neighbors). X: mean number of whistles per sequence (From Hausberger, 1997).
Figure 5. Intervals separating two successive whistles produced by two different individuals during vocal interaction (overlap: when two whistles overlap). Most whistling exchanges show an interval of 2 s or less between the first and second whistle (arrow).
Figure 12. Whistles of a male and a female O. morio (Top): whistles are separated by silent intervals. Choruses of L. nitens: several birds singing together with their songs in overlap.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Summary
Keywords
turn-taking, vocal interactions, conversation rules, mammals, birdsong, sturnids
Citation
Henry L, Craig AJFK, Lemasson A and Hausberger M (2015) Corrigendum: Social coordination in animal vocal interactions. Is there any evidence of turn-taking? The starling as an animal model. Front. Psychol. 6:1924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01924
Received
22 October 2015
Accepted
30 November 2015
Published
16 December 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited and reviewed by
Marisa Casillas, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Netherlands
Updates
Copyright
© 2015 Henry, Craig, Lemasson and Hausberger.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Laurence Henry lhenry@univ-rennes1.fr
This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.