ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Physical Education and Pedagogy
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1655758
This article is part of the Research TopicLeisure and Recreation Access, Inclusion, and Participation Amongst People with DisabilitiesView all 9 articles
A Qualitative Exploratory Study of Teachers' Perceptions of Movement Behavior of Students with Intellectual Disabilities in the School Context
Provisionally accepted- University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study explored teachers' perceptions of movement behavior of students with intellectual disabilities (ID), intending to support the development of adapted motor assessment instruments and interventions. The study involved 16 teachers from German schools for children and adolescents with ID. A semi-structured interview focusing on six central research questions was conducted. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative text analysis with the help of MAXQDA. Six main thematic codes were generated within the analysis. Teachers’ perceptions revealed that students show different levels of motor development and that most demonstrate potential for motor learning. As ascertained by the teachers, students can generally be considered a remarkably heterogeneous population, encompassing individuals with diverse diagnoses, needs, and motor and cognitive abilities. The teachers also reported that the students are able to perform simple everyday activities and are keen to learn or perform activities that help them become more independent and self-determined. However, they have difficulties performing fine and gross motor activities. A range of individual, task-related, and environmental factors influences movement behavior and desires, as well as problems related to movement behavior. In the context of teaching practices, the teachers underlined the importance of using an individualized and gradual methodological approach to promote students' movement behavior. The findings suggest that both motor interventions and assessments should be adapted to the specific needs or characteristics of children and adolescents with ID so that they can participate and perform. Moreover, motor assessments and interventions should be systematically structured to address the specific needs of children and adolescents with ID, and to optimize the progress in motor learning. Within physical training, practitioners should place value on improving activities that are important for increasing independence and mastering everyday life, as well as for the overall personal development of the individual with ID. Attractive and promising tasks, as well as assistive technology, may be regarded as appropriate means to promote movement behavior. Future research should include the views of students and their families and other exploration techniques, e.g., direct observation or group interviews, to expand the understanding of movement behavior.
Keywords: developmental disorders, individual, task, and environmental constraints, Qualitative interview, Motor Skills, Newells's Constraint Model, Gentile taxonomy of motor skills
Received: 01 Jul 2025; Accepted: 17 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Messerschmidt and Schott. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nadja Schott, nadja.schott@inspo.uni-stuttgart.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.