Abstract
The rice XA21 and XA3 pattern receptor kinases, derived from Oryza longistaminata and an Oryza. sativa japonica cultivar Wase Aikoku 3, respectively, confer resistance to strains of the Gram-negative bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), the causal agent of rice bacterial blight disease. Previously, we showed that transfer of Xa21 to the model rice cultivar Kitaake enhances resistance to Xoo. In this manuscript we demonstrate that Kitaake expressing Xa3 confers resistance to Xoo strain PXO79 and that the stress-related marker genes PR10b and KO5 are upregulated in Xoo-infected Xa3 rice leaves. We also show that rice somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 2 (OsSERK2) positively regulates XA3-mediated immunity in Kitaake. We found that overexpression of XA21 binding protein 15 (XB15) and XB24, two negative regulators of XA21-mediated immunity, do not affect XA3-mediated immunity in the Kitaake genetic background. Our results indicate that the rice immune receptors XA21 and XA3 employ both shared and distinct signaling components in their response to Xoo. The results are important to further understand pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity in rice. Furthermore, the presence of Kitaake rice carrying Xa3 will facilitate genetic research to study the XA3-mediated immunity.
Introduction
Plants detect and defend against diverse microbes via the innate immune system (Chisholm et al., 2006). One branch of plant innate immunity is mediated by receptors localized on the cell membrane that activate the immune responses upon recognition of extracellular signals derived from pathogens (Boller and Felix, 2009). In rice, the Xanthomonas resistance 21 (XA21) and XA3 (also named XA26) receptor kinases confer robust resistance to strains of the Gram-negative bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) that causes bacterial blight disease of rice (Song et al., 1995; Sun et al., 2004; Xiang et al., 2006). XA21 and XA3 belong to the XII subfamily of leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs) and share common features typical of LRR-RLK proteins: an extracellular leucine-rich repeat domain, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic non-arginine-aspartate (non-RD) kinase domain. XA21 and XA3 share 53% amino acid sequence identity (Sun et al., 2004). XA21 contains 23 leucine-rich repeats, and XA3 harbors 26 repeats (Song et al., 1995; Sun et al., 2004). XA21 recognizes a tyrosine-sulfated protein derived from Xoo; the ligand for XA3 remains unknown (Pruitt et al., 2015; Luu et al., 2019). Like XA21, XA3 confers broad-spectrum resistance to most Xoo strains including PXO79 but not PXO99 (Song et al., 1995; Sun et al., 2004).
Based on the structural similarity of XA21 and XA3, we hypothesized that XA21 and XA3 might share components that transduce the immune response. Previous genetic studies revealed that OsSERK2 (rice somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 2) is required for both XA21 and XA3-mediated immunity (Chen et al., 2014). In addition to OsSERK2, several other regulators of XA21-mediated immunity were previously identified and might also be involved in XA3-mediated immunity. XA21 binding protein 24 (XB24) physically associates with the XA21 juxtamembrane (JM) domain and catalyzes the autophosphorylation of XA21 at serine and threonine residue(s), keeping it in an inactive state (Chen et al., 2010b). Upon pathogen recognition, XA21 kinase dissociates from XB24 and becomes active, resulting in a robust resistance response (Chen et al., 2010b). XB15 encodes a protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C), which dephosphorylates XA21, attenuating XA21 signaling (Park et al., 2008).
Xa21 was introgressed into diverse genetic backgrounds of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) from the wild species Oryza longistaminata (Ikeda et al., 1990; Khush et al., 1990; Park et al., 2008). For example, Xa21 expression in the O. sativa ssp. Japonica variety Kitaake confers robust resistance to Xoo strain PXO99. Kitaake has many advantages for rice genetic studies. For example, Kitaake is smaller in stature and has a much shorter life cycle (9–10 weeks) than other commonly studied rice cultivars (2–3 generations per year), allowing researchers to grow four to five generations each year (Jung et al., 2008). Kitaake is easy to propagate and is less sensitive to light quality, intensity, and photoperiod change (Jung et al., 2008). Moreover, Kitaake is highly amenable to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (Toki, 1997), the complete sequence of Kitaake is available (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html#!info?alias=Org_OsativaKitaake_er) and a large collection of whole-genome sequenced Kitaake mutants is assembled (Li et al., 2017). These advantages make Kitaake an excellent model for rice genetic research. Here I have used genetic analysis to determine if XA3 confers race-specific resistance in the Kitaake genetic background and if XB24 and XB15 are required for XA3-mediated immunity.
Materials and Methods
Plasmid Construction and Rice Transformation
The Xa3 coding sequence (3,312 nt) from National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) with or without tags was cloned into the pENTR/d TOPO vector (Chern et al., 2005). The genes were then introduced into the Gateway-compatible vector pCAMBIA4300 which contains a maize ubiquitin promoter. The constructs were transferred into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 by electroporation. Regenerated plants were selected on mannose. The presence of the transgene was confirmed by PCR using primers which anneal to the Xa3 sequence and the nos terminator in the vector (Xa3/F (5'-GGCAGTGGGTTCAACAGGCGT-3') and Nos/R (5'- AATCATCGCAAGACCGGCAACAGG-3').
OsXb24 overexpression (A109-6-5-1) (Chen et al., 2010b), OsXb15 overexpression (19A-72-4) (Park et al., 2008) and OsSerk2 RNAi (X-B-4-2) (Chen et al., 2014) transgenic plants in the Kitaake genetic background were used for crossing with Ubi-Xa3-8-3-2 to obtain Xa3OsXb24OE, Xa3OsXb15OE, and Xa3OsSerk2 Ri plants. The crosses were performed using Ubi : Xa3-8-3-2 as the pollen donor. PCR-based genotyping of Xa3, OsXb24OE, OsXb15OE, and OsSerk2Ri was performed as described previously (Park et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2010b; Chen et al., 2014). Successful crosses of Xa3Xb24OE and Xa3Xb15OE were confirmed in the F1 generation. Double transgenic plants were analyzed in the F2 generation by PCR reactions using a forward primer annealing to the Ubiquitin promoter and a gene-specific reverse primer (Ubi/F(5'-TTGTCGATGCTCACCCTGTGTTT-3'), Xb15/R(5'-ATGCTCTGGTCACCTTCAGCG-3') and Xb24/R(5'-TTACACATCTGTAATCTTGCTGC-3'). Xa3Serk2Ri plants were genotyped with primers annealing to the hygromycin gene in the vector (Hyg3(5'-TCCACTATCGGCGAGTACTTCTACACA-3') and Hyg4(5'-CACTGGCAAACTGTGATGGACGAC)).
Bacterial Strains, Pathogen Inoculation, and Disease Scoring
For rice inoculation, Xoo strain PXO79 was grown on PSA plates [10 g of peptone (bacto-Peptone), 10 g of sucrose, 1 g of sodium glutamate (glutamic acid, monosodium salt), 16 g of bacto-agar, final volume 1L (pH: 7)] at 28°C in the dark for 2–3 days. The bacteria were resuspended in water, and the inoculum was adjusted to an optical density (O.D.) 600 of 0.5 (~5 ×108 CFU/ml). Rice plants were grown in the greenhouse for five weeks and then moved into the controlled growth chamber for inoculation by the leaf-clipping method (Song et al., 1995). The temperature was maintained at 28°C with a 12-h photoperiod. Disease lesions were scored by measuring the lesion length at 14 days after inoculation.
Bacterial Treatments of Detached Rice Leaves
Bacteria treatment of detached rice leaves was performed from 4-week old rice. Expanded adult leaves were cut into 1-cm sections using surgical-grade scissors. Samples were placed into 6-well Costar cell culture plates containing 1.5 ml of 10 mM MgCl2 solution for mock treatment or 10 mM MgCl2 containing a fresh Xoo cell suspension at O.D. 600 = 0.1. The plates were incubated under constant light [between 5 and 10 μmol/(m2*s)]; samples were collected 24 h post treatment for total RNA extraction (Thomas et al., 2016).
RNA Isolation and qPCR Gene Expression Analysis of Infected Leaf Samples
Detached leaves were frozen in liquid nitrogen and disrupted with a Qiagen Tissue Lyser. RNA was extracted using the Spectrum Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). The TURBO DNase Kit (Life Technologies) was used to digest 2 μg of total RNA that was synthesized with a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies). The ΔΔCt method was used to determine gene expression changes normalized to Actin (LOC_Os03g50885) and compared to mock-treated samples (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008). qRT-PCR primer pairs used in the experiments were as follows: qActin-F/R(5′-ATCCTTGTATGCTAGCGGTCGA-3′/5′-ATCCAACCGGAGGATAGCATG-3′), PR10b-F/R(5′-TGTGGAAGGTCTGCTTGGAC-3′/5′-CCTTTAGCACGTGAGTTGCG-3′) and KO5-F/R(5′-GCTGGCTTCCAAACAAGAGC-3′/5′-GCCTCTTGATCAACGCGTTC-3′). The qRT-PCR reaction was run for 40 cycles with annealing and amplification at 58°C for 5 s and denaturation at 95°C for 5 s.
Protein Extraction and Western Blot Assays
Total protein was extracted from 100 mg of rice leaf tissue. The leaf sample was frozen in liquid nitrogen and disrupted with a Qiagen Tissue Lyser. Two hundreds microliter of pre-chilled extraction buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 0.01 M sodium phosphate buffer pH = 7.2, 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1% Sigma protease cocktail) was added, and protein was separated on an 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel. Flag-tagged XA3 was detected by western blot using a mouse anti-Flag primary antibody (Invitrogen) and anti-mouse IgG coupled to HRP (Santa Cruz) as a secondary antibody.
Results
Generation of Functional XA3 Lines in the Kitaake Rice Background
XA3 was derived from Oryza sativa japonica cultivar Wase Aikoku 3 and confers robust resistance to Xoo strain PXO79 (Ezuka, 1975; Ogawa, 1987). Xa26 was identified in Indica rice cultivar Minghui 63 and later genetic analysis showed that Xa3 and Xa26 are the same gene (Yang et al., 2003; Xiang et al., 2006). Here we use Xa3 to represent the gene. To assess the function of Xa3 in the Kitaake genetic background, the maize ubiquitin promoter was used to overexpress the Xa3 cDNA. Fourteen independently transformed lines were generated (designated Ubi : Xa3-1 to Ubi : Xa3-14). Six of these independently transformed lines showed resistance upon inoculation with PXO79 (Figure 1A). We also produced Ubi : Xa3 transgenic rice lines with carboxyl-terminal tags of Flag, Myc or HA (hemagglutinin). Nine independent T0 Ubi : Xa3:Flag (designated Ubi : Xa3:Flag-1 to Ubi : Xa3:Flag-9) (Figure 1B), eleven T0 Ubi : Xa3:Myc (designated Ubi : Xa3:Myc-1 to Ubi : Xa3:Myc-11) (Figure 1C) and 10 T0 Ubi : Xa3:HA (designated Ubi : Xa3:HA-1 to Ubi : Xa3:HA-10) lines were generated (Figure 1D). All plants were inoculated at five weeks along with the Kitaake control; lesion lengths were measured 14 days post inoculation (dpi). Five Ubi : Xa3:Flag, three Ubi : Xa3:Myc, and five Ubi : Xa3:HA lines showed clear resistance to PXO79 (Figures 1B–D).
Figure 1
To assess if the resistance phenotype was transmitted to the next generation, T0 lines were self pollinated and T1 seeds were collected. These T1 plants together with rice plants lacking Xa3 as controls were inoculated with Xoo strain PXO79 and assessed for resistance by measuring the lengths of disease-induced lesions (Figure 2). Inoculations were further carried out in Ubi : Xa3:Flag-8-12 and Ubi : Xa3-8-3 plants. We observed that T1 and T2 individuals that were PCR positive for the Xa3 transgene (PCR targeting the Xa3 sequence and nos terminator) co-segregated with resistance to PXO79 (Figure 2). Homozygous lines of Ubi : Xa3:Flag-8-12 and Ubi : Xa3-8-3 were used for subsequent experiments (Figure 3). We performed western blot assays to monitor the XA3:Flag protein in the Ubi : Xa3:Flag-8-12-1 line using anti-Flag antibodies. Western blot analysis showed that the XA3:Flag protein is detectable in this line while Kitaake displays no detectable bands (Figure 3C). We did not detect the XA3:Myc or XA3:HA protein in western blot analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 3
Infection Leads to Increased Expression of Defense-Related Genes in Detached Rice Leaves
To assess the activation of the XA3-mediated immune response, we first set up a quick and reliable assay. Here we tested the induction of two genetic markers in detached rice leaves following PXO79 infection. We used rice leaves harvested from 4-week-old plants grown in a hydroponic system as described previously (Pruitt et al., 2015). Rice leaves were cut into 1-cm pieces and floated on 10 mM MgCl2 as mock treatment or 10 mM MgCl2 containing PXO79 cell suspensions (O.D. 600 = 0.1). The samples were kept under constant light and harvested at 24 h post-treatment for RNA extraction. Two previously described defense-related marker genes, PR10b (LOC_Os12g36850) and KO5 (LOC_Os06g37224) were assayed as a readout for immune activation in Xoo-infected Xa3 rice leaves (Figure 4) (Pruitt et al., 2015; Thomas et al., 2016). Gene expression changes were normalized to actin (LOC_Os03g50885) and compared to mock-treated samples. We observed that PR10b was upregulated 3.5 fold and KO5 was elevated about 10 fold in the Xa3 rice leaves treated with PXO79 compared to mock-treated samples. Neither was upregulated in the non-infected Xa3 rice leaves or PXO79-infected Kitaake leaves. These results demonstrate that PR10b and KO5 can be used as defense marker genes for XA3-mediated immunity.
Figure 4
Neither Xb24 Nor Xb15 Overexpression Compromises the XA3-Mediated Immune Response
To test the role that XB24 or XB15 plays in the XA3-mediated immune response, we crossed Xa3 Kitaake plants (Ubi : Xa3-8-3-2 in Kitaake) with Kitaake lines overexpressing either Xb24 (Xb24OE A109-6-5-1) or Xb15 (Xb15OE 19A-72-4) individually (Park et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2010b). Overexpression of either of these genes in an XA21 background attenuates XA21-mediated resistance to Xoo (Park et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2010b). An OsSerk2 RNAi line in Kitaake (OsSerk2Ri X-B-4-2) was used as a positive control (Chen et al., 2014). The F1 progeny were named Xa3Xb24OE F1, Xa3Xb15OE F1, and Xa3OsSerk2Ri F1. We isolated double-transgenic lines from independent crosses after PCR genotyping for each transgene and confirming Xb15 or Xb24 overexpression or OsSerk2 silencing by qRT-PCR (Figures 5C, 6C and 7C). We next assessed the impact of Xb24 and Xb15 overexpression on Xa3-mediated immunity by inoculating with PXO79. Plants carrying Xa3Xb15OE and Xa3Xb24OE were as resistant as Xa3 plants to PXO79, showing similar lesion lengths (Figures 6A, B and 7A, B). Plants carrying both Xa3 and OsSerk2 RNAi displayed much longer lesions at 14 dpi than Xa3 control plants (Dunnett's test; α = 0.05) (Figures 5A, B). Inoculation of F2 segregating progeny confirmed these results (Figure 5D). The resistant phenotype co-segregated with the Xa3 transgene. In the F2 progeny, the presence of Xb24 and Xb15 overexpression had no effects on XA3-mediated resistance (Figures 6D and 7D). These results indicate that overexpression of XB24 and XB15 does not suppress the XA3-mediated immune response.
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
The Intracellular Kinase Domains of XA3 and XA21 Differ
Protein kinases fall into two broad classes based on phosphorylation site specificity: serine/threonine-protein kinases and tyrosine-protein kinases (Hanks et al., 1988). XA21 encodes a serine/threonine protein kinase. There are 34 predicted serine/threonine and only 1 predicted tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the XA21 intracellular domain based on analysis by the phosphorylation sites prediction tool, NetPhos 3.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos/) (Figure 8) (Blom et al., 2004). Previous studies demonstrated that Ser-686, Thr-688, Ser-689, and Thr-705, but none of the tested tyrosine residues, are required for XA21-mediated immunity (Xu et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2010a; Caddell et al., 2018).
Figure 8
We also used the NetPhos tool to identify 27 predicted Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites and 4 predicted tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the XA3 intracellular domain based on NetPhos3.1 (Figure 8). To date, there have been no reports experimentally validating the predicted XA3 phosphorylation sites.
Here we show that the amino acid sequence of the kinase domains of XA21 and XA3 are quite divergent. In particular, the amino acids predicted to be involved in ATP binding are not well conserved between the two receptor kinases (Figure 8). Based on domain analysis (https://pfam.xfam.org), the XA3 kinase domain is predicted to be a protein tyrosine kinase.
Discussion
Previous studies showed that Xa3 and Xa21 confer resistance to Xoo when introgressed or expressed in diverse rice cultivars (Song et al., 1995; Sun et al., 2004). Here, we demonstrate that the rice gene Xa3 also confers robust resistance to Xoo in the model rice cultivar Kitaake. The presence of Kitaake rice lines carrying Xa3 and Xa21 will facilitate further research to investigate other components that may regulate both XA3- and XA21-mediated immunity in the same rice genetic background. Genetic analysis results show that overexpression of two previously characterized negative regulators of Xa21 signaling, Xb24 and Xb15 (Park et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2010b), had no effects on XA3-mediated immunity in Kitaake. To validate this result, additional experiments are needed. For example, evaluation of Kitaake lines silenced or knocked out for Xb15 or Xb24 would reveal if these genes could serve as positive regulators of XA3-mediated immunity. Because XB15 and XB24 are both members of multi-gene families, it is not possible to rule out a role for other family members in modulating the immune response. For example, XB15 is one of 76 serine/threonine type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2C) in rice and XB15 shows high similarity with several rice PP2C members, with the PP2C encoded by Os03g25600 being the closest homolog (Park et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2014).
Plant PRRs mostly belong to Ser/Thr kinases (Shiu and Bleecker, 2001), and Tyr phosphorylation of receptor kinases have been mostly reported in plant RD kinases signaling such as for the receptor kinases BIK1 (Botrytis-induced kinase 1) and BAK1 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1) which are involved in plants growth and immunity (Lin et al., 2014), and the Tyr428 phosphorylation of CERK1 (chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1) is required for fungal chitin triggered immune signaling (Liu et al., 2018). For the non-RD kinases, the Arabidopsis receptor kinase EF-TU Receptor (EFR), has been reported being activated upon ligand binding by phosphorylation on its tyrosine residues (Macho et al., 2014). Here, we also show that the amino acid sequence of the kinase domains of XA21 and XA3 are quite divergent, and that XA3 carries fewer predicted Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites compared with XA21. The XA3 kinase domain is predicted to be a protein tyrosine kinase. In addition, the amino acids predicted to be involved in ATP binding are not well-conserved between the two kinase domains. These observed differences in the XA21 vs. XA3 kinase amino acid sequences may dictate different requirements for binding with downstream signaling components.
Funding
Supported by NIH GM59962 and GM122968 to PR.
Statements
Data availability statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.
Author contributions
FL and WZ performed the experiments. TW, BS and PR contributed to conception. FL and PR wrote the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript and read and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BlomN.Sicheritz-PonténT.GuptaR.GammeltoftS.BrunakS. (2004). Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics4, 1633–1649. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300771
2
BollerT.FelixG. (2009). A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.60, 379–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346
3
CaddellD. F.WeiT.SharmaS.OhM.-H.ParkC.-J.CanlasP.et al. (2018). Four tyrosine residues of the rice immune receptor XA21 are not required for interaction with the co-receptor OsSERK2 or resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. PeerJ6, e6074. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6074
4
ChenX.ChernM.CanlasP. E.JiangC.RuanD.CaoP.et al. (2010a). A conserved threonine residue in the juxtamembrane domain of the XA21 pattern recognition receptor is critical for kinase autophosphorylation and XA21-mediated immunity. J. Biol. Chem.285, 10454–10463. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.093427
5
ChenX.ChernM.CanlasP. E.RuanD.JiangC.RonaldP. C. (2010b). An ATPase promotes autophosphorylation of the pattern recognition receptor XA21 and inhibits XA21-mediated immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.200912311, 8029–8034. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912311107
6
ChenX.ZuoS.SchwessingerB.ChernM.CanlasP. E.RuanD.et al. (2014). An XA21-associated kinase (OsSERK2) regulates immunity mediated by the XA21 and XA3 immune receptors. Mol. Plant7, 874–892. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu003
7
ChernM.CanlasP. E.FitzgeraldH. A.RonaldP. C. (2005). Rice NRR, a negative regulator of disease resistance, interacts with Arabidopsis NPR1 and rice NH1. Plant J.43, 623–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02485.x
8
ChisholmS. T.CoakerG.DayB.StaskawiczB. J. (2006). Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell124, 803–814. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008
9
EzukaA. (1975). Inheritance of resistance of rice variety Wase Aikoku 3 to Xanthomonas oryzae. Bull. Tokai-Kinki Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn.28, 124–130.
10
HanksS. K.QuinnA. M.HunterT. (1988). The protein kinase family: conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. Science241, 42–52. doi: 10.1126/science.3291115
11
IkedaR.KhushG.TabienR. (1990). A new resistance gene to bacterial blight derived from O. longistaminata. Jpn. J. Breed40, 280–281.
12
JungK.-H.AnG.RonaldP. C. (2008). Towards a better bowl of rice: assigning function to tens of thousands of rice genes. Nat. Rev. Genet.9, 91. doi: 10.1038/nrg2286
13
KhushG. S.BacalangcoE.OgawaT. (1990). A new gene for resistance to bacterial blight from O. longistaminata. Rice Genet. Newsl.7, 121–122.
14
LiG.JainR.ChernM.PhamN. T.MartinJ. A.WeiT.et al. (2017). The sequences of 1,504 mutants in the model rice variety Kitaake facilitate rapid functional genomic studies. Plant Cell. 29, 1218–1231. doi: 10.1101/111237
15
LinW.LiB.LuD.ChenS.ZhuN.HeP.et al. (2014). Tyrosine phosphorylation of protein kinase complex BAK1/BIK1 mediates Arabidopsis innate immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.111, 3632–3637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318817111
16
LiuJ.LiuB.ChenS.GongB.-Q.ChenL.ZhouQ.et al. (2018). A tyrosine phosphorylation cycle regulates fungal activation of a plant receptor Ser/Thr kinase. Cell host Microbe23, 241–253. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.005
17
LuuD. D.JoeA.ChenY.ParysK.BaharO.PruittR.et al. (2019). Biosynthesis and secretion of the microbial sulfated peptide RaxX and binding to the rice XA21 immune receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.116, 8525–8534. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818275116
18
MachoA. P.SchwessingerB.NtoukakisV.BrutusA.SegonzacC.RoyS.et al. (2014). A bacterial tyrosine phosphatase inhibits plant pattern recognition receptor activation. Science343, 1509–1512. doi: 10.1126/science.1248849
19
OgawaT. (1987). Gene symbols for resistance to bacterial leaf blight. RGN4, 41–43.
20
ParkC. J.PengY.ChenX.DardickC.RuanD.BartR.et al. (2008). Rice XB15, a protein phosphatase 2C, negatively regulates cell death and XA21-mediated innate immunity. PloS Biol.6, e231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060231
21
PruittR. N.SchwessingerB.JoeA.ThomasN.LiuF.AlbertM.et al. (2015). The rice immune receptor XA21 recognizes a tyrosine-sulfated protein from a Gram-negative bacterium. Sci. Adv.1, e1500245. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500245
22
SchmittgenT. D.LivakK. J. (2008). Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc.3, 1101. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73
23
ShiuS.-H.BleeckerA. B. (2001). Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.98, 10763–10768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181141598
24
SongW. Y.WangG. L.ChenL. L.KimH. S.PiL. Y.HolstenT.et al. (1995). A Receptor Kinase-Like Protein Encoded by the Rice Disease Resistance Gene, Xa21. Science270, 1804–1806. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5243.1804
25
SunX.CaoY.YangZ.XuC.LiX.WangS.et al. (2004). Xa26, a gene conferring resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice, encodes an LRR receptor kinase-like protein. Plant J.37, 517–527. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01976.x
26
ThomasN. C.SchwessingerB.LiuF.ChenH.WeiT.NguyenY. P.et al. (2016). XA21-specific induction of stress-related genes following Xanthomonas infection of detached rice leaves. PeerJ4, e2446. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2446
27
TokiS. (1997). Rapid and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.15, 16–21. doi: 10.1007/BF02772109
28
XiangY.CaoY.XuC.LiX.WangS. (2006). Xa3, conferring resistance for rice bacterial blight and encoding a receptor kinase-like protein, is the same as Xa26. Theor. Appl. Genet.113, 1347–1355. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0388-x
29
XuW. H.WangY. S.LiuG. Z.ChenX.TinjuangjunP.PiL. Y.et al. (2006). The autophosphorylated Ser686, Thr688, and Ser689 residues in the intracellular juxtamembrane domain of XA21 are implicated in stability control of rice receptor-like kinase. Plant J.45, 740–751. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02638.x
30
YangZ.SunX.WangS.ZhangQ. (2003). Genetic and physical mapping of a new gene for bacterial blight resistance in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet.106, 1467–1472. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1205-4
31
YangD.-H.HettenhausenC.BaldwinI. T.WuJ. (2014). The multifaceted function of BAK1/SERK3. Plant Signaling Behav.6, 1322–1324. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.9.16438
Summary
Keywords
rice, rice bacterial blight, XA21, XA3, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae
Citation
Liu F, Zhang W, Schwessinger B, Wei T, Ruan D and Ronald P (2020) The Rice Xa3 Gene Confers Resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in the Model Rice Kitaake Genetic Background. Front. Plant Sci. 11:49. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00049
Received
02 August 2019
Accepted
14 January 2020
Published
06 February 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Stephen Bruce Goodwin, United States Department of Agriculture, United States
Reviewed by
Hidenori Matsui, Okayama University, Japan; Seiichi Toki, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Liu, Zhang, Schwessinger, Wei, Ruan and Ronald.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pamela Ronald, pcronald@ucdavis.edu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Plant Microbe Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.