Abstract
The role of bio- and chemo-catalytic aerobic oxidations in the production of commodity chemicals in a bio-refinery is reviewed. The situation is fundamentally different to that in a petrochemicals refinery where the feedstocks are gaseous or liquid hydrocarbons that are oxidized at elevated temperatures in the vapor or liquid phase under solvent-free conditions. In contrast, the feedstocks in a biorefinery are carbohydrates that are water soluble solids and their conversion will largely involve aerobic oxidations of hydroxyl functional groups in water as the solvent under relatively mild conditions of temperature and pressure. This will require the development and use of cost-effective and environmentally attractive processes using both chemo- and biocatalytic methods for alcohols and polyols.
Introduction
One of the grand challenges of the twenty-first century is the implementation of the transition from an unsustainable economy based on fossil resources–oil, coal, and natural gas—to a sustainable, carbon-neutral economy based on the use of renewable biomass. This switch to a so-called bio-based economy is urgently required in order to mitigate global warming caused by increasing carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. First generation (1G) renewable raw materials, exemplified by corn starch, sugar cane, and sugar beet, are not perceived as sustainable options in the long term as their utilization involves, directly, or indirectly, competition with food production. In contrast, the use of second generation (2G) renewable biomass, in the form of waste polysaccharides, such as lignocellulose (Liguori and Faraco, 2016; Zhang et al., 2017) and pectin, from agricultural and forestry residues and food supply chain waste (Dahiya et al., 2018), is perceived as a sustainable long term option for producing biofuels and commodity chemicals (Sheldon, 2014, 2016, 2018; Horváth et al., 2017). Looking further afield, third generation (3G) aquatic biomass, such as micro- and macro-algae and cyanobacteria, has additional advantages (John et al., 2011; Al Abdallah et al., 2016; Shuba and Kifle, 2018). For example, there is no requirement for arable land and fresh water for their production and they have much higher growth rates than terrestrial plants. On the other hand, there are substantial technical problems associated with their production and conversion which, in the short term, represent a significant hurdle to be overcome for commercial viability.
Carbohydrates to Commodity Chemicals in a Biorefinery
In a petrochemical refinery the basic chemicals are lower olefins (ethylene, propylene, and butenes) and aromatics (BTX: benzene, toluene, and xylenes), together with carbon monoxide and hydrogen (syn gas). The hydrocarbons are gases or hydrophobic liquids. They are converted with petrochemical catalytic technologies, particularly catalytic oxidation with dioxygen, to a variety of commodity chemicals, usually in solvent-free systems. In contrast, the basic chemicals in a bio-refinery will be C6 and C5 sugars produced by hydrolysis of polysaccharide feedstocks, and/or syn gas produced by their gasification. The carbohydrates are hydrophilic, water soluble solids. Several scenarios can be envisaged for further conversion to commodity chemicals (Figure 1):
Syn gas could be converted to commodity chemicals by applying existing catalytic technologies used in petrochemical refineries or by fermentation (Phillips et al., 2017; Asimakopoulos et al., 2018).
Monosaccharides such as glucose could be converted to a variety of lower alcohols, diols, carboxylic acids, and dicarboxylic acids by fermentation. Indeed, fermentation is already the commercially most viable route to many of these products with lactic acid, 1,3-propane diol and 1,4-butane diol as prominent examples.
Bioethanol, produced as a carbon neutral fuel, could be converted to ethylene and a variety of other products using established technologies (see Figure 1), including catalytic aerobic oxidations.
Chemo- or bio-catalytic conversion of monosaccharides, such as glucose, to commodity chemicals will require in many cases removal of oxygen, by hydrogenolysis and/or dehydration. Catalytic oxidations in a biorefinery involve oxidation of alcoholic OH groups in monosaccharides, or even the polysaccharide precursors, or their downstream products and further oxidation of the resulting carbonyl compounds.
Figure 1
Conversion of polysaccharides to biofuels and commodity chemicals in a biorefinery.
Catalytic Oxidations
A key reaction in organic synthesis is the oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols to give the corresponding aldehydes or carboxylic acids and ketones, respectively. Traditionally these transformations were performed with stoichiometric quantities of inorganic oxidants, notably chromium (VI) compounds such as the Jones reagent (CrO3 and sulfuric acid). However, such procedures are not atom efficient and lead to the formation of copious amounts of toxic, chromium-containing waste, i.e., high E factors and problematic waste disposal issues. Consequently, in the last two decades such methods have been increasingly replaced by atom efficient catalytic alternatives involving dioxygen or hydrogen peroxide as the terminal oxidant.
Interestingly, the history of catalytic oxidations of carbohydrates (Arts et al., 1997) predates the oxidations of lower olefins and aromatics that form the basis of the petrochemical industry. The aerobic oxidation of mannose over a platinum black catalyst, for example, dates from 1861 (von Gorup-Besanez, 1861) and many supported noble metal catalyzed aerobic oxidations of carbohydrates were developed in the first half of the last century. At the turn of the century, we developed an aqueous biphasic system for the aerobic oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols to the corresponding aldehydes and ketones, respectively, in a solvent free system using a water-soluble palladium complex of bathophenanthroline (ten Brink et al., 2000). This system could also be effective in the aerobic oxidation of water soluble alcohols, including carbohydrates. Indeed, there are many examples of the aerobic oxidation of alcohols catalyzed by precious metals such as palladium, platinum and gold (Stahl, 2004; Parmaggiani and Cardona, 2012). However, in the context of the conversion of carbohydrates to large volume, low-priced commodity chemicals, precious metals such as palladium have the disadvantage that the future availability of these scarce, “endangered elements” at cost-effective prices is rather unpredictable. Indeed, in contrast to most materials, their price tends to increase with increasing usage. Another disadvantage of noble metal catalyzed oxidations is their functional group intolerance. First row, more earth abundant metals tend to be more functional group tolerant.
Consequently, alternative methods have been developed that use “earth abundant” metals, such as copper and iron, as catalysts. One method with broad applications in the selective oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes, even in the presence of secondary alcohols, involves the combination of a Cu(II)-bipyridine (Cu-bpy) complex with a base, such as potassium hydroxide, a stable nitroxyl radical, exemplified by 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidine-N-oxyl (TEMPO) and its derivatives, at ambient temperature with air in aqueous acetonitrile (Figure 2; Gamez et al., 2003; Sheldon and Arends, 2004; Marais and Swarts, 2019). The generally accepted mechanism involves as the key, rate determining step, abstraction of a hydrogen atom from an alkoxide ligand by a coordinated nitroxyl radical analogous to that involved in the aerobic oxidation of primary alcohols catalyzed by the copper-dependent oxidase, galactose oxidase (Dijksman et al., 2003). An improved procedure, using Cu(I) salts with TEMPO and bipy in combination with N-methylimidazole as a base in acetonitrile as solvent was subsequently described by Stahl and coworkers (Hoover and Stahl, 2011). Furthermore, extensive mechanistic studies confirmed the copper-centered galactose oxidase-like mechanism for these systems (Geiβlmeir et al., 2005; Hoover et al., 2013).
Figure 2
Aerobic oxidation of primary alcohols catalyzed by Cu/TEMPO.
The lack of reactivity of secondary alcohols was attributed to steric hindrance in the abstraction of an α-hydrogen atom from a coordinated alkoxide by a coordinated TEMPO ligand. Consequently, the use of sterically less hindered nitroxyl radicals such as AZADO and ABNO, respectively, in combination with Cu(I) complexes, were developed by the groups of Iwabuchi (Shibuya et al., 2006, 2011; Iwabuchi, 2013) and Stahl (Steves and Stahl, 2013), for the aerobic oxidation of secondary alcohols (Figure 3), including sterically demanding alcohols such as menthol and a variety of unprotected amino alcohols (Sasano et al., 2014).
Figure 3
Catalytic aerobic oxidation of secondary alcohols with Cu (I)/nitroxyl catalysts.
More recently, Ma and coworkers reported the use of an Fe(III)/4-hydroxyTEMPO/NaCl combination as a catalyst for the aerobic oxidation of both primary and secondary alcohols (Jiang et al., 2016, 2019). Other metals, including manganese, cobalt and vanadium, have also been used in combination with nitroxyl radicals (Cao et al., 2014) Transition metal free nitroxyl systems have also been described, usually involving nitrogen dioxide as the active co-catalyst. The commercially most attractive source of the NO2 cocatalyst is nitric acid (Kuang et al., 2010). For example, nitric acid or NaNO2 or a mixture of both was used, in combination with ABNO or keto-ABNO, for the selective aerobic oxidation of secondary alcohols (Figure 4; Lauber and Stahl, 2013). Interestingly, the combination of nitric acid and NaNO2 catalyzes the aerobic oxidation of alcohols even in the absence of a stable nitroxyl radical. The reaction involves an alkyl nitrite intermediate which decomposes to the carbonyl compound and HNO which is reoxidized by dioxygen (Aellig et al., 2011). Unfortunately, the greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (N2O), can be irreversibly formed as a byproduct.
Figure 4
Nitric acid catalyzed aerobic oxidation of alcohols.
Catalytic Oxidations in a Bio-based Economy
Although these various nitroxyl radical-based catalysts have been widely used in the aerobic oxidations of alcohols they have generally involved relatively simple primary and secondary alcohols in organic solvents, sometimes mixed with water. This was done with the development of green syntheses of, for example, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and flavors and fragrances, in mind. However, in a bio-based economy it is of interest to use these methodologies in the selective oxidation of renewable carbohydrates or key alcohols, diols, and polyols derived from them, and this involves in many cases aqueous solutions of solid substrates.
Water has both advantages and limitations as a solvent for aerobic oxidations. For example, oxidations with oxygen are much safer as there is no formation of explosive mixtures of oxygen with volatile organic solvents in the gas phase. In a typical process oxygen is supplied by bubbling air through the solution. However, the transfer of oxygen from the gas to the liquid phase is notoriously slow owing to its low solubility in water under typical operating conditions (0.268 mM at 25°C and 1 bar air) which limits the maximum space time yield to 200 mmol/L/h (Pedersen et al., 2015). This problem was alleviated in the Cu/TEMPO system by using air-microbubble techniques to facilitate gas absorption into the liquid phase (Mase et al., 2011). Alternatively, the rates of enzymatic aerobic oxidations were increased by a factor of 100 in continuous flow operation compared to the conventional batch operation (Chapman et al., 2018; Hone and Kappe, 2019). Another disadvantage of water as a solvent is that its relatively high heat capacity, compared to volatile organic solvents, translates to high energy costs for its removal by distillation.
A pertinent example, from the viewpoint of the bio-based economy, is the use of acetylamino-TEMPO (AA-TEMPO) together with nitric acid as the cocatalyst for the aerobic oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols to the corresponding aldehydes and ketones, respectively, in acetic acid or water as the solvent (Dingerdissen et al., 2011). The method was particularly useful for the oxidation of the key biomass-derived diol, isosorbide, to the corresponding diketone (Figure 5; Klasovsky et al., 2015). This is particularly surprising because of the low reactivity of the shielded endo OH group in isosorbide.
Figure 5
Aerobic oxidation of isosorbide to the corresponding diketone. (A) AA-TEMPO/HNO3 in HOAc. (B) Laccase/Tempo in HOAc.
Isosorbide is a commercially interesting platform chemical produced by hydrogenation of glucose to sorbitol followed by dehydration (Figure 6). It has interesting features as an industrial monomer based on its rigidity, chirality, and non-toxicity (Fenouillot et al., 2010). For example, reaction with dicarboxylic acids (or esters) affords polyesters. Alternatively, oxidation to the corresponding diketones, followed by reductive amination, affords the corresponding bis-primary amine (Figure 5) which can be converted to polyamides by reaction with dicarboxylic acids (esters).
Figure 6
Isosorbide as a platform chemical.
Biocatalysis in aqua: The Natural Solution
As was noted elsewhere, biocatalysis is green and sustainable (Hollmann et al., 2011; Sheldon and Woodley, 2018), conforming to 10 of the 12 principles of green chemistry, and the catalyst is non-toxic, biocompatible and biodegradable. Moreover, enzymatic reactions are generally performed in water, a particularly suitable medium for conversions of polysaccharides in a bio-based economy. Furthermore, carbohydrates tend to be ideal substrates and generally have a stabilizing effect on enzymes. In contrast with precious metal catalysts, the long term availability and price stability of enzymes is assured since they are produced from inexpensive, readily available biomass. Moreover, industrial scale oxidations employing precious metal catalysts often involve a costly purification step to remove traces of the metal in the product. In contrast, no costly removal of trace amounts of enzymes are needed in enzymatic oxidations and any enzyme ending up in aqueous effluent undergoes facile biodegradation.
Laccase/Nitroxyl Radical Combinations
Laccases (EC 1.10. 3.2) are a diverse group of extracellular, copper-dependent oxidases. They are produced, for example, by white rot fungi, and play a key role in the delignification of lignocellulose in vivo (Rochefort et al., 2004). There is considerable commercial interest in the use of laccases in the pulp and paper industry and in waste water remediation in general (Gasser et al., 2014; Singh et al., 2018; Unuofin et al., 2019). They have broad substrate specificity and use dioxygen to oxidize a wide variety of, inter alia, phenols and aromatic amines in vivo. In combination with so-called mediators, notably TEMPO, they are able oxidize alcohols as was first shown by Fabbrini et al. (2001). These reactions involve one-electron oxidation of the TEMPO by the laccase to give the oxoammonium cation which is the active oxidant (Arends et al., 2006a). The reduced form of laccase is then reoxidized by dioxygen.
The laccase/TEMPO system was shown to catalyze the aerobic oxidation of primary and secondary aliphatic alcohols and 10 mol% was sufficient to give good conversions and excellent selectivities (Arends et al., 2006b). Interestingly, Ying and coworkers (Zhu et al., 2014) obtained superior results with 5 mol% laccase/AZADO, especially in the aerobic oxidation of complex and highly functionalized alcohols. Suicide inactivation is a problem with laccases since at high substrate conversions the oxoammonium cation can oxidize reactive groups in the protein or in the associated glycosyl moieties on the periphery of the enzyme (laccases are glycosylated enzymes). The stability of laccases under the reaction conditions can be significantly increased by immobilization as cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) (Matijosyte et al., 2010).
The laccase/TEMPO system also catalyzed the aerobic oxidation of the renewable diol, isosorbide to the corresponding diketone (see section Catalytic Oxidations and Figure 5B) in >99% yield (Gross et al., 2014). Similarly, 1,4 and 1,5-diols were oxidized to the corresponding lactones (Figure 7, Diaz-Rodriguez et al., 2012) and immobilization of the laccase as cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) enabled multiple recycling (Sheldon et al., 2013).
Figure 7
Laccase/TEMPO catalyzed oxidation of diols and polyols.
Copper and Flavin Dependent Alcohol Oxidases
As shown in Figure 8, there are two types of alcohol oxidases: Cu-dependent and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). Both generate an equivalent of hydrogen peroxide as the coproduct and catalase is added to decompose it back to oxygen and water. Alternatively, catalase can be used to generate oxygen in situ. A major shortcoming of wild-type oxidases is their substrate specificity. For example, galactose oxidase (GOase) and glucose oxidase (GOX) and are very specific for galactose and glucose, respectively. Indeed, these enzymes have evolved in vivo to be very efficient in converting their natural substrate. However, in order to be useful in organic synthesis they need to be active and selective with a variety of alcohol substrates, particularly highly functionalized alcohols. Fortunately, this can be achieved with protein engineering using in vitro evolution.
Figure 8
Types of alcohol oxidases.
For example, Turner and coworkers used directed evolution techniques to produce GOase variants that catalyze the oxidation of secondary alcohols (Figure 9A; Escaletters and Turner, 2008) and amino alcohols (Herter et al., 2015; Figure 9B). Similarly, a GOase variant catalyzed the aerobic oxidation of lactose, a disaccharide formed as a waste stream (whey) in cheese manufacture, to form the dialdehyde (Figure 9C; Cosgrove et al., 2019). The latter is of interest as a raw material for polymers. Interestingly, a GOase variant was also shown to catalyze the synthesis of nitriles by ammoxidation of primary alcohols (Figure 9D; Vilim et al., 2018).
Figure 9
Biocatalytic aerobic oxidation of (A) 1-phenylethanol, (B) an amino alcohol, (C) lactose, and (D) ammoxidation of a primary alcohol.
Structure directed evolution was also used to develop variants of the FAD-dependent choline oxidase that catalyze the aerobic oxidation of a broad range of primary alcohols to the corresponding aldehydes (Figure 10; Heath et al., 2019). Similarly, FAD-dependent HMF oxidase was engineered to effectively catalyze all three oxidation steps in the conversion of HMF to FDCA (see later).
Figure 10
Aerobic oxidations catalyzed by FAD-dependent alcohol oxidase variants.
Another reaction of industrial interest is the aerobic oxidation of glucose to glucaric acid. A hypothetical process involving two steps with a mixture of GOX and a GOase variant which is able to accept gluconolactone as a substrate is shown in Figure 11. Alternatively, it can be produced by aerobic oxidation of glucuronic acid, a building block derived from (waste) pectin (see section Acid-Catalyzed Dehydration of Carbohydrates to Furan Derivatives). Glucaric acid is of interest as an industrial monomer in itself (Wu et al., 2019) and can also be hydrogenated to adipic acid, the raw material for Nylon 6.
Figure 11
Hypothetical biocatalytic oxidation of glucose to glucaric acid.
Alcohol Dehydrogenases
Alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs) catalyze the oxidation of alcohols by utilizing a nicotinamide cofactor which has to be regenerated in situ using an excess of a co-substrate (Kroutil et al., 2004a; Weckbecker et al., 2010). Alternatively, NAD(P)H oxidase (NOx) can be employed to catalyze reoxidation of the cofactor by oxygen (Kroutil et al., 2004b; Zhang et al., 2016). Yet another possibility is to couple the oxidation step with a reduction step, to afford an overall redox neutral process by employing so-called hydrogen borrowing, a concept which itself was borrowed from chemocatalysis literature (Hamid et al., 2007). For example, combination of an ADH with an amine dehydrogenase (AmDH) affords a redox-neutral conversion of a racemic alcohol to a single enantiomer of the corresponding amine (Figure 12; Mutti et al., 2015). Ironically, it requires the use of an aselective ADH (Thompson and Turner, 2017) because it has to catalyze the oxidation of both alcohol enantiomers, which is not a simple task as most ADHs are highly enantioselective. The overall efficiency of the process, which constitutes a conversion of an OH to an NH2 group, was improved by co-immobilization of the ADH and AmDH (Böhmer et al., 2018). When the alcohol, or polyol, is readily available this would be an industrially attractive way to produce the corresponding (poly)amine. A pertinent example is the conversion of isosorbide to the diamine discussed in section Catalytic Oxidations.
Figure 12
Enzymatic conversion of an alcohol to an amine.
Direct Oxidation of Polysaccharides
It is also of commercial interest to oxidize polysaccharides, e.g., starch and cellulose, directly to the corresponding polycarboxylic acids. Carboxystarch, for example, has potential applications as a biodegradable water super absorbent. Polysaccharides can be readily oxidized using NaOCl as the stoichiometric oxidant and TEMPO or derivatives as the catalyst (Ponedel'kina et al., 2010). However, for a commercially and environmentally attractive process it should preferably use oxygen as the stoichiometric oxidant. The laccase/TEMPO system (see above) catalyzes the aerobic oxidation of the primary alcohol moieties in starch affording carboxystarch (Viikari et al., 1999) but the relatively high enzyme costs, owing to its instability under the oxidizing reaction conditions, form an obstacle to commercialization. The stability was improved by immobilization as a cross-linked enzyme aggregate (CLEA) (Matijosyte et al., 2010).
Acid-catalyzed Dehydration of Carbohydrates to Furan Derivatives
Acid catalyzed dehydration of pentoses and hexoses produces furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) (Tong et al., 2010), respectively. Furfural is an important commodity chemical (Lange et al., 2012) and HMF has the potential to become one (van Putten et al., 2013; Kucherov et al., 2018). Initial isomerization of D-glucose to D-fructose is followed by acid catalyzed dehydration (Figure 13) but in yields that are not conducive to commercial viability owing to the limited stability of HMF in the acidic reaction medium (Wang et al., 2017). However, according to a recent report HMF can be obtained in 95% yield by conducting the reaction with D-fructose under continuous flow conditions (Galaverna et al., 2018).
Figure 13
Acid catalyzed dehydration of xylose and glucose.
Polyethylene furandicarboxylate (PEF), which was developed by Avantium1 is produced from furan-2,5-dicarboxylic acid (FDCA) and ethylene glycol It is seen as a renewable alternative for fossil-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET). In addition to reducing CO2 emissions, PEF has superior mechanical, thermal, and gas barrier properties to PET. The key raw material, FDCA, can be produced in excellent yields by aerobic oxidation of HMF using supported precious metal catalysts (Liu et al., 2015; Zhang and Deng, 2015; Zheng et al., 2017; Motagamwala et al., 2018) or an engineered flavin-dependent alcohol oxidase (Dijkman et al., 2015) or whole cell biocatalysts (Koopman et al., 2010) in aqueous media (Figure 14).
Figure 14
Catalytic aerobic oxidation of HMF to FDCA.
FDCA can also be produced from uronic acids present in various agricultural residues. D-galacturonic acid, for example, is available in large quantities from the pectin in sugar beet pulp (Leijdeckers et al., 2013) and D-glucuronic acid is one of the main constituents of pectin in certain soft- and hardwoods. Aerobic oxidation of uronic acids over gold catalysts (van Es et al., 2013) affords the corresponding aldaric acids that can subsequently be dehydrated to FDCA (Figure 15; Miller et al., 2017). Alternatively, uronic acids can be isomerized to the corresponding 5-keto aldonic acids which can be converted to FDCA dimethyl ester by acid catalyzed cyclodehydration to the methyl ester of 5-formyl-2-furoic acid in methanol followed by Au/C catalyzed aerobic oxidation (van der Klis et al., 2017).
Figure 15
Alternative routes to FDCA.
Finally, we note that this review is focused on the conversion of the carbohydrate fractions of feedstocks to commodity chemicals in a biorefinery. In practice, for commercial viability both the carbohydrate and the lignin fractions will be converted to both commodity chemicals and biofuels and this will involve both chemo- and biocatalytic methods in water (Rinaldi et al., 2016; Bugg et al., 2019).
Conclusions and Prospects
Remarkable progress has been made in the last two decades in the development of green and sustainable catalytic methodologies for the aerobic oxidations of primary and secondary alcohols to aldehydes and ketones, respectively. However, a cursory perusal of the literature reveals that we have hardly scratched the surface with regard to the application of such catalytic methodologies to the valorization of bio-based feedstocks and key platform chemicals in biorefineries. Recent developments in the engineering of oxidative enzymes, such as copper- and flavin-dependent alcohol oxidases, using directed evolution techniques, strongly suggest that industrially viable methods for catalytic oxidations relevant to a bio-based economy will be forthcoming in the near future.
One could say that glucose is the new ethylene, and possibly propylene and butenes all rolled into one. In the words of Primo Levi: “It is the destiny of wine to be drunk and it is the destiny of glucose to be oxidized.”
Statements
Author contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AelligC.GirardC.HermansI. (2011). Aerobic alcohol oxidations mediated by nitric acid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 12355–12360. 10.1002/anie.201105620
2
Al AbdallahQ. A.NixonB. T.FortwenderJ. R. (2016). The enzymatic conversion of major algal and cyanobacterial carbohydrates to bioethanol. Front. Energy Res. 4:36. 10.3389/fenrg.2016.00036
3
ArendsI. W. C. E.LiY. X.AusanR.SheldonR. A. (2006a). Comparison of TEMPO and its derivatives as mediators in laccase catalysed oxidation of alcohols. Tetrahedron62, 6659–6665. 10.1016/j.tet.2005.12.076
4
ArendsI. W. C. E.LiY. X.SheldonR. A. (2006b). Stabilities and rates in the laccase/TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of alcohols. Biocat. Biotransform. 24, 443–448. 10.1080/10242420601040683
5
ArtsS. J. H. F.MombargE. J. M.van BekkumH.SheldonR. A. (1997). Hydrogen peroxide and oxygen in catalytic oxidation of carbohydrates and related compounds. Synthesis597–613. 10.1055/s-1997-1406
6
AsimakopoulosK.GavalaH. N.SkiadisI. V. (2018). Reactor systems for syngas fermentation processes: A review. Chem. Eng. J.348, 732–744. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.003
7
BöhmerW.KrausT.MuttiF. (2018). Hydrogen-borrowing alcohol bioamination with coimmobilizeddehydrogenases. ChemCatChem.10, 731–735. 10.1002/cctc.201701366
8
BuggT. D. H.WilliamsonJ. J.RashidG. M. M. (2019). Bacterial enzymes for lignin depolymerisation: new catalysts for generation of renewable chemicals from biomass. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 55, 26–33. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.11.007
9
CaoQ.DornanL. M.RoganL.HughesN. L.MuldoonM. J. (2014). Aerobic oxidation catalysis with stable radicals. Chem. Commun. 50, 4524–4543. 10.1039/C3CC47081D
10
ChapmanM. R.CosgroveS. C.TurnerN. J.KapurN.BlackerN. J. (2018). Highly productive oxidative biocatalysis in continuous flow by enhancing the aqueous equilibrium solubility of oxygen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57,10535–10539. 10.1002/anie.201803675
11
CosgroveS. C.MatteyA. P.RieseS.ChapmanM. R.BirminghamW. R.BlackerJ. A.et al. (2019). Biocatalytic oxidation in continuous flow for the generation of carbohydrate dialdehydes. ACS Catal.9, 11658–11662. 10.1021/acscatal.9b04819
12
DahiyaS.KumarA. N.SravanJ. S.ChatterjeeS.SarkarO. (2018). Food waste biorefinery: sustainable strategy for circular economy. Bioresour. Technol. 248, 2–12. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.176
13
Diaz-RodriguezA.LavanderaI.Kanbak-AksuS.SheldonR. A.GotorV.Gotor-FernandezV. (2012). From diols to lactones under aerobic conditions using a laccase/TEMPO catalytic system in aqueous medium. Adv. Synth. Catal. 354, 3405–3408. 10.1002/adsc.201200892
14
DijkmanW. P.BindaC.FraaijeM. W.MatteviA. (2015). Structure-based enzyme tailoring of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural oxidase. ACS Catalysis5, 1833–1839. 10.1021/acscatal.5b00031
15
DijksmanA.ArendsI. W. C. E.SheldonR. A. (2003). Cu(II)-Nitroxyl radicals as catalytic galactose oxidase mimics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 1, 3232–3237. 10.1039/b305941c
16
DingerdissenU.PfefferJ.TackeT.HaasT.SchmidtH.KlasovskyF.et al. (2011). Method for Producing Aldehydes and Ketones From Primary and Secondary Alcohols. US 2011/0251399 A1. Essen: Evonik Degussa GmbH.
17
EscalettersF.TurnerN. J. (2008). Directed evolution of galactose oxidase: generation of enantioselective secondary alcohol oxidases. ChemBioChem. 9, 857–860. 10.1002/cbic.200700689
18
FabbriniM.GalliC.GentiliP.MachitellaD. (2001). An oxidation of alcohols by oxygen with the enzyme laccase and mediation by TEMPO. Tetrahedron Lett. 42, 7551–7553. 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01463-0
19
FenouillotF.RousseauA.ColominesG.Saint-LoupR.PascaultJ. P. (2010). Polymers from renewable 1,4:3,6-dianhydrohexitols (isosorbide, isomannide and isoidide): a review. Progr. Polym. Sci.35, 578–622. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.001
20
GalavernaR.BreitkreitzM. C.PastreJ. C. (2018). Conversion of D-fructose to 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural: evaluating batch and continuous flow conditions by design of experiments and in-line FTIR monitoring. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng.6, 4220–4230. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04643
21
GamezP.ArendsI. W. C. E.ReedijkJ.SheldonR. A. (2003). Copper(II)- catalysed oxidation of primary alcohols. Chem. Commun. 2414–2415. 10.1039/b308668b
22
GasserC. A.AmmannE. M.ShahgaldianP.CorviniP. F. X. (2014). Laccases to take on the challenge of emerging organic contaminants in wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 9931–9952. 10.1007/s00253-014-6177-6
23
GeiβlmeirD.JaryW. G.FalkH. (2005). The TEMPO/copper catalyzed oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes using oxygen as stoichiometric oxidant. Monatsh Chem. 136, 1591–1599. 10.1007/s00706-005-0349-0
24
GrossJ.TauberK.FuchsM.SchmidtN. G.RajagopalanA.FaberK.et al. (2014). Aerobic oxidation of isosorbide and isomannide employing TEMPO/Laccase. Green Chem. 16, 2117–2121. 10.1039/C3GC41855C
25
HamidM. H. S. A.SlatfordP. A.WilliamsJ. M. J. (2007). Borrowing hydrogen in the activation of alcohols. Adv. Synth. Catal. 349, 1555–1575. 10.1002/adsc.200600638
26
HeathR. S.BirminghamW. R.ThompsonM. P.TaglieberA.DavietL.TurnerN. J. (2019). An engineered alcohol oxidase for the oxidation of primary alcohols. ChemBioChem. 20, 276–281. 10.1002/cbic.201800556
27
HerterS.McKennaS. M.FrazerA. R.LehmkαhlerS.CarnellA. J.TurnerN. J. (2015). Galactose oxidase variants for the oxidation of amino alcohols in enzyme cascade synthesis. ChemCatChem. 7, 2313–2317. 10.1002/cctc.201500218
28
HollmannF.ArendsI. W. C. E.BuehlerK.SchallmeyA.BühlerB. (2011). Enzyme-mediated oxidations for the chemist. Green Chem. 13, 226–265. 10.1039/C0GC00595A
29
HoneC. A.KappeC. O. (2019). The use of molecular oxygen for liquid phase aerobic oxidations in continuous flow. Top. Curr. Chem. 377:2. 10.1007/s41061-019-0233-8
30
HooverJ. M.RylandB. L.StahlS. S. (2013). Copper/TEMPO- catalyzed aerobic oxidation of alcohols: mechanistic assessment of different catalyst systems. ACS Catal.3, 2599–2605. 10.1021/cs400689a
31
HooverJ. M.StahlS. S. (2011). Highly practical copper(I)/TEMPO catalyst system for chemoselective aerobic oxidation of primary alcohols. J Am Chem Soc. 133, 16901–16910. 10.1021/ja206230h
32
HorváthI. T.CséfalvayE.MikaL. T.DebreczeniM. (2017). Sustainability metrics for biomass-based carbon chemicals. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 5, 2734–2740. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b03074
33
IwabuchiY. (2013). Discovery and exploitation of AZADO: the highly active catalyst for alcohol oxidation. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 61, 1197–1213. 10.1248/cpb.c13-00456
34
JiangX.LiuJ.MaS. (2019). Iron-catalyzed aerobic oxidation of alcohols: lower cost and improved selectivity. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 23, 825–835. 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00374
35
JiangX.ZhangJ.MaS. (2016). Iron catalysis for room-temperature aerobic oxidation of alcohols to carboxylic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 8344–8347. 10.1021/jacs.6b03948
36
JohnR. P.AnishaG. S.NampoothiriK. M.PandeyA. (2011). Micro and macroalgal biomass: a renewable source for bioethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 186–193. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.139
37
KlasovskyF.HaasT.TackeT.PfefferJ. C.RimbachM.VollandM.et al. (2015). Continuously Operable Method for Producing Carbonyl Compounds by Means of a Catalyst Containing a Nitroxyl Radical. US 8,981,159 B2. Essen: Evonik Degussa GmbH.
38
KoopmanF.WiercxkN.de WindeJ. H.RuijssenaaarsH. J. (2010). Efficient whole-cell biotransformation of 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural into FDCA, 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 6291–6296. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.050
39
KroutilW.MangH.EdeggerK.FaberK. (2004a). Biocatalytic oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols. Adv. Synth. Catal. 346, 125–142. 10.1002/adsc.200303177
40
KroutilW.MangH.EdeggerK.FaberK. (2004b). Recent advances in the biocatalytic reduction of ketones and oxidation of sec-alcohols. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8, 120–126. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.02.005
41
KuangY.RokubuichiH.NabaeY.HayakawaT.KakimotoM. (2010). A nitric acid assisted carbon-catalyzed oxidation system with nitroxide radical cocatalysts as an efficient and green protocol for selective aerobic oxidation of alcohols. Adv. Synth. Catal. 352, 2635–2642. 10.1002/adsc.201000366
42
KucherovF. A.RomashovL. V.GalkinK. I.AnanikovV. P. (2018). Chemical transformations of biomass-derived C6-furanic platform chemicals for sustainable energy research, materials science and synthetic building blocks. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng. 6, 8064–8092. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00971
43
LangeJ. P.van der HeideE.van BuijtenenJ.PriceR. (2012). Furfural - a promising platform for lignocellulosic biofuels. ChemSusChem. 5, 150–166. 10.1002/cssc.201100648
44
LauberM. B.StahlS. S. (2013). Efficient aerobic oxidation of secondary alcohols at ambient temperature with an ABNO/NOx catalyst system. ACS Catal. 3, 2612–2616. 10.1021/cs400746m
45
LeijdeckersA. G. M.BinkJ. P. M.GeutjesS.ScholsH. A.GruppenH. (2013). Enzymatic saccharification of sugar beet pulp for the production of galacturonic acid and arabinose; a study on the impact of the formation of recalcitrant oligosaccharides. Bioresour. Technol. 128, 518–525. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.126
46
LiguoriR.FaracoV. (2016). Biological processes for advancing lignocellulosic waste biorefinery by advocating circular economy. Bioresour. Technol. 215, 13–20. 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.054
47
LiuB.RenY.ZhangZ. (2015). Aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid in water under mild conditions. Green Chem. 17, 1610–1617. 10.1039/C4GC02019G
48
MaraisL.SwartsA. J. (2019). Biomimetic Cu/Nitroxyl catalyst systems for selective alcohol oxidation. Catalysts9, 1–28. 10.3390/catal9050395
49
MaseN.MizumoriT.TatemotoY. (2011). Aerobic copper/TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes using a microbubble strategy to increase gas concentration in liquid phase reactions. Chem. Commun. 47, 2086–2088. 10.1039/c0cc04377j
50
MatijosyteI.ArendsI. W. C. E.de VriesS.SheldonR. A. (2010). Preparation and use of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) of laccases. J. Mol. Catal. B62, 142–148. 10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.09.019
51
MillerD. J.PeereboomLWegenerE.GattingerM. (2017). Formation of 2,5-Furandicarboxylic Acid From Aldaric Acids. US 9701652 B1 2017. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University.
52
MotagamwalaA. H.WonW.SenerC.AlonsoD. M.MarveliasC. T.DumesicJ. A. (2018). Toward biomass-derived renewable plastics: production of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid from fructose. Sci Adv. 4, 1–8. 10.1126/sciadv.aap9722
53
MuttiF. G.KnausT.ScruttonN. S.BreuerM.TurnerN. J. (2015). Conversion of alcohols to enantiopure amines through dual-enzyme hydrogen-borrowing cascades. Science349, 1525–1529. 10.1126/science.aac9283
54
ParmaggianiC.CardonaF. (2012). Transition metal based catalysts in the aerobic oxidation of alcohols. Green Chem. 14, 547–564. 10.1039/c2gc16344f
55
PedersenA. T.BirminghamW. R.RehnG.CharnockS. J.TurnerN. J.WoodleyJ. M. (2015). Process requirements of galactose oxidase catalyzed oxidation of alcohols. Org. Proc. Res. Dev.19, 1580–1589. 10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00278
56
PhillipsJ. R.HuhnkeR. L.AtiyehH. K. (2017). Syngas fermentation: a microbial conversion process of gaseous substrates to various products. Fermentation3:28. 10.3390/fermentation3020028
57
Ponedel'kinaI. Y.KhaibrakhmanovaE. A.OdinokovV. N. (2010). Nitroxide-catalyzed selective oxidation of alcohols and polysaccharides. Russ. Chem. Rev. 79, 63–75. 10.1070/RC2010v079n01ABEH004074
58
RinaldiR.JastrzebskiR.CloughM. T.RalphJ.KennemaM.BruijnincxP. C. A.WeckhuysenB. M. (2016). Paving the way for lignin valorization: recent advances in bioengineering, biorefining and catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 8164–8215. 10.1002/anie.201510351
59
RochefortD.LeechD.BourbonnaisR. (2004). Electron transfer mediator systems for bleaching of paper pulp. Green Chem.6, 614–624. 10.1039/b311898n
60
SasanoY.NagasawaS.YamazakiM.ShibuyaM.ParkJ.IwabuchiY. (2014). Highly chemoselective aerobic oxidation of amino alcohols into amino carbonyl compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 3236–3240. 10.1002/anie.201309634
61
SheldonR. A. (2014). Green and sustainable manufacture of chemicals from biomass: state of the art. Green Chem. 16, 950–963. 10.1039/C3GC41935E
62
SheldonR. A. (2016). Green chemistry, catalysis and valorization of waste biomassJ. Mol. Catal. A422, 3–12. 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.01.013
63
SheldonR. A. (2018). The road to biorenewables: carbohydrates to commodity chemicals. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.6, 4464–4480. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00376
64
SheldonR. A.ArendsI. W. C. E. (2004). Organocatalytic oxidations mediated by nitroxyl radicals Adv. Synth. Catal. 346, 1051–1071. 10.1002/adsc.200404110
65
SheldonR. A.van PeltS.Kanbak-AksuS.RasmussenJ.JanssenM. H. A. (2013). Cross-linked enzyme aggregates in organic synthesis. Aldrichimica Acta, 46, 81–93.
66
SheldonR. A.WoodleyJ. M. (2018). Role of biocatalysis in sustainability. Chem. Rev.118, 801–838. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00203
67
ShibuyaM.OsadaY.SasanoY.TomizawaM.IwabuchiY. (2011). Highly efficient, organocatalytic aerobic alcohol oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 6497–6500. 10.1021/ja110940c
68
ShibuyaM.TomizawaM.SuzukiI.IwabuchiY. (2006). 2-Azaadamantane N-Oxyl (AZADO) and 1-Me-AZADO: highly efficient organocatalysts for oxidation of alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 8412–8413. 10.1021/ja0620336
69
ShubaE. S.KifleD. (2018). Microalgae to biofuels: ‘Promising' alternative and renewable energy, review. Renew Sust. Energy Rev.81, 743–755. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.042
70
SinghJ.SaharanV.KumarS.GulatiP.KapoorR. K. (2018). Laccase grafted membranes for advanced water filtration systems: a green approach to water purification technology. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 38, 883–901. 10.1080/07388551.2017.1417234
71
StahlS. S. (2004). Selective oxidation of organic compounds by direct dioxygen-coupled turnover. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.43, 3400–3420. 10.1002/anie.200300630
72
StevesJ. E.StahlS. S. (2013). Copper/ABNO catalyzed aerobic alcohol oxidation. Alleviating steric and electronic constraints of Cu/tempo catalyst systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15742–15745. 10.1021/ja409241h
73
ten BrinkG. J.ArendsI. C. W. E.SheldonR. A. (2000). Green, catalytic oxidation of alcohols in water. Science287,1636–1639. 10.1126/science.287.5458.1636
74
ThompsonM. P.TurnerN. J. (2017). Two-enzyme hydrogen-borrowing amination of alcohols enabled by a cofactor-switched alcohol dehydrogenase. ChemCatChem. 23, 3833–3836. 10.1002/cctc.201701092
75
TongX.MaY.LiY. (2010). Biomass into chemicals: conversion of sugars to furan derivatives by catalytic processes. Appl. Catal. A385, 1–13. 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.06.049
76
UnuofinJ. O.OkohA. I.NwodoU. U. (2019). Aptitude of oxidative enzymes for treatment of wastewater pollutants: a laccase perspective. Molecules, 24:2064. 10.3390/molecules24112064
77
van der KlisF.van HaverenJ.van EsD. S.BitterJ. H. (2017). Synthesis of furan dicarboxylic acid esters from nonfood feedstocks without concomitant levulinic acid formation. ChemSusChem, 10, 1460–1468. 10.1002/cssc.201700051
78
van EsD. S.van HaverenJ.RaaijmakersH. W. C.van der KlisF.van EngelenG. P. F. M. (2013). Catalytic Oxidation of Uronic Acids to Aldaric Acids. WO 2013/151428 A1. Wageningen: Stichting Dienst Landbouwkundig Onderzoek.
79
van PuttenR. J.van der WaalJ. C.de JongE.RasrendraC. B.HeeresH. J.de VriesJ. G. (2013). Hydroxymethylfurfural, a versatile platform chemical made from renewable resources. Chem. Rev. 113, 1499–1597. 10.1021/cr300182k
80
ViikariL.Niku-PaavolaM. I.BuchertJ.ForssellP.TelemanA.KruusK. (1999). Method of Producing Oxidized Starch.Helsinki: Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus, WO 99/23240.
81
VilimJ.KrausT.MuttiF. (2018). Catalytic Promiscuity of galactose oxidase. a mild synthesis of nitriles from alcohols, air and ammonia. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 14240–14244. 10.1002/anie.201809411
82
von Gorup-BesanezE. F. (1861). Ueber die producte der einwirkung des platinmohrs auf mannit. Ann Chem. 118:257. 10.1002/jlac.18611180302
83
WangJ.XiJ.XiaQ.LiuX.WangY. (2017). Recent advances in heterogeneous catalytic conversion of glucose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural via green routes. Sci. China Chem. 60, 870–886. 10.1007/s11426-016-9035-1
84
WeckbeckerA.GrögerH.HummelW. (2010). Regeneration of nicotinamide coenzymes: principles and applications for the synthesis of chiral compounds. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 120, 195–242. 10.1007/10_2009_55
85
WuY.EnomotoY.MasakiH.IwataT. (2019). Synthesis of polyamides from sugar derived d-glucaric acid and xylylenediamines. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 136, 1–6. 10.1002/app.47255
86
ZhangJ. D.CuiZ. M.FanX. J.WuH. L.ChangH. H. (2016). Cloning and characterization of two distinct water-forming NADH oxidases from Lactobacillus pentosus for the regeneration of NAD. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 39, 603–611. 10.1007/s00449-016-1542-8
87
ZhangZ.DengK. (2015). Recent advances in the catalytic synthesis of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid and its derivatives. ACS Catal. 5, 6529–6544. 10.1021/acscatal.5b01491
88
ZhangZ.SongJ.HanB. (2017). Catalytic transformation of lignocellulose into chemicals and fuel products in ionic liquids. Chem. Rev. 117, 6834–6880. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00457
89
ZhengL.ZhaoJ.DuZ.ZongB.LiuH. (2017). Efficient aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfufural to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid on Ru/C catalysts. Chem. Sci. China60, 950–957. 10.1007/s11426-016-0489-3
90
ZhuC.ZhangZ.DingW.XieJ.ChenY.WuJ.et al. (2014). A mild and highly efficient laccase-mediator system for aerobic oxidation of alcohols. Green Chem. 16, 1131–1138. 10.1039/C3GC42124D
Summary
Keywords
bio-based economy, biomass, biocatalysis, catalytic oxidation, alcohol oxidases, carbohydrates, waste valorization
Citation
Sheldon RA (2020) Catalytic Oxidations in a Bio-Based Economy. Front. Chem. 8:132. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00132
Received
18 December 2019
Accepted
13 February 2020
Published
28 February 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Vasile I. Parvulescu, University of Bucharest, Romania
Reviewed by
Valeria Conte, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy; Konstantinos Triantafyllidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Sheldon.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Roger A. Sheldon roger.sheldon@wits.ac.za
This article was submitted to Green and Sustainable Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.