Editorial: Advances and applications of artificial intelligence and numerical simulation in risk emergency management and treatment
Yunhui Zhang
Quanle Zou
Yihuai Zhang
Leilei Liu
Chengyi Pu- 1Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
- 2State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
- 3James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- 4School of Geoscience and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 5School of Insurance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China
Editorial on the Research Topic
Advances and applications of artificial intelligence and numerical simulation in risk emergency management and treatment
There are various types of risks in the world, with geological, environmental, and ecological risks, such as karst desertification, water inrush, rock burst, debris flow, and landslides, existing in natural and engineering situations (Liu et al., 2019; Luo et al., 2020; Xue et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2022). These risks pose significant safety threats to human survival. Therefore, risk emergency management and treatment have become important topics of the national governance system and governance capacity. They take on the crucial responsibility of preventing and resolving significant security risks, timely responding to all kinds of disasters and accidents, the significant mission of protecting people’s lives and property, and maintaining social stability. To better study risk emergency management and treatment, interdisciplinary risk science was formed, which includes environmental science, earth science, engineering science, safety science, and information science.
Our Research Topic focused on novel research in risk emergency management and treatment. A total of 21 research papers on this Research Topic present the Advances and applications of artificial intelligence and numerical simulation in risk emergency management and treatment.
Artificial intelligence and numerical simulation are feasible in the prevention of geohazards, such as landslides, karst desertification, etc. Ma et al., Wei et al., and Wang et al. investigated the regional characteristics of landslides and evaluated the susceptibility by machine learning methods. Cai et al., Yang et al., and Yan and Xiao analyzed the mechanical mechanisms and treatment measures of local rock slopes by numerical simulation.
A geophysical exploration is an efficient approach to detecting blind geological problems. Chen et al. used a 3D vertical seismic profile (VSP) survey to indicate an offshore subsurface characterization. Jia et al. applied the high-density resistivity method to detect a mined-out area of a quarry in Xiangtan City. Li et al. found a new way to efficiently calculate seismic wave travel time. Zheng et al. introduced a very new technology to explain unmanned aerial vehicle remote-sensing images based on a fully convolutional neural network.
Advances and applications of artificial intelligence and numerical simulation were applied to tunnel engineering. Chen et al., Li et al., Lu et al., and Zeng et al. used numerical simulations to investigate engineering problems and their mechanisms. Gao et al., Li et al., Zhang et al., and Zhang et al. used artificial intelligence and numerical simulation to seek advanced and efficient methods to address engineering.
This Research Topic also brings some novel research related to the ecological environment. Qin et al. revealed the karst water circulation of eastern Sichuan in southwestern China based on the GIS and environmental isotope methods. Xu et al. conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the Ruoergai Prairie ecosystem upstream of the Yellow River.
So far, brilliant achievements have been obtained in the field of artificial intelligence and numerical simulation in risk emergency management and treatment. However, more related research is expected to be carried out, helping to construct a safer world.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
The successful organization of this Research Topic is attributed to the hard work of all authors and reviewers. We are grateful to everyone who contributed their precious time to this Research Topic. Finally, we sincerely appreciate the immense help from the editorial board of Frontiers in Earth Science, Frontiers in Environmental Science, and Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Huang, F., Yan, J., Fan, X., Yao, C., Huang, J., Chen, W., et al. (2022). Uncertainty pattern in landslide susceptibility prediction modelling: Effects of different landslide boundaries and spatial shape expressions. Geosci. Front. 13 (2), 101317. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101317
Liu, Y., Feng, Y., Xu, M., Zhang, Y., Long, H., and Zhu, H. (2019). Effect of an incremental change in external water pressure on tunnel lining: A case study from the tongxi karst tunnel. Nat. Hazards 98 (2), 343–377. doi:10.1007/s11069-019-03692-3
Luo, Y., Fan, X., Huang, R., Wang, Y., Yunus, A. P., and Havenith, H. (2020). Topographic and near-surface stratigraphic amplification of the seismic response of a mountain slope revealed by field monitoring and numerical simulations. Eng. Geol. 271, 105607. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105607
Xue, Y., Kong, F., Qiu, D., Su, M., Zhao, Y., and Zhang, K. (2020). The classifications of water and mud/rock inrush hazard: A review and update. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 80 (3), 1907–1925. doi:10.1007/s10064-020-02012-5
Keywords: real-timing monitoring, risk forecasting, early-warning model, risk assessment, risk emergency management and treatment, artificial intelligence
Citation: Zhang Y, Zou Q, Zhang Y, Liu L and Pu C (2023) Editorial: Advances and applications of artificial intelligence and numerical simulation in risk emergency management and treatment. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1239559. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1239559
Received: 13 June 2023; Accepted: 19 June 2023;
Published: 29 June 2023.
Edited and reviewed by:
Yi Xue, Xi’an University of Technology, ChinaCopyright © 2023 Zhang, Zou, Zhang, Liu and Pu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yunhui Zhang, zhangyunhui@swjtu.edu.cn