Tubulins represent the backbone of a living system. Every cell exists as a complex nanoscale machinery, specifically the cytoskeleton network of microtubules. These building blocks are composed of long, very rigid, and hollow charged biopolymers of α- and β-tubulin heterodimer protein subunits. These dynamic cylindrical constructs perform a myriad of cellular functions such as intracellular transport, cell motility, cell shape, and chromosome segregation during mitosis and act as tracks for the kinesin motor proteins (Bertalan et al., 2014; Katsuki et al., 2014). The tubulin dimers form linear protofilaments and assemble into a cylindrical structure with ~25 nm outer diameter and ~15 nm inner diameter. The length of microtubules can be ~50 μm to several micrometers and are negatively charged. Microtubules are dynamically unstable tubulin polymers in equilibrium with monomers that interconvert stochastically between growing and shrinking phases, vital for cellular functions. This rapid transition phase is referred to as the “turning on-off microtubules” phenomenon. The conformational switch is linked to the GTP hydrolysis in β-tubulin. The protofilaments are in straight conformation during polymerization of microtubules and in curved shape during depolymerization of microtubules (Bertalan et al., 2014; Katsuki et al., 2014). Due to the vital role of microtubules in mitosis, they are excellent anticancer drug targets such as Taxol and vinca alkaloids. The rationale of this commentary is based on the unique shape-remodeling supernanostructures of microtubules, which can be used as novel biomaterials for delivery of nanomedicines.
Microtubule bundles possess a tightly packed geometry. Nanoscale superstructures are the sources of inspiration for the design of complex materials, i.e., shape and surface pattern with advanced functionalities (Gröschel et al., 2013). By modifying the diameter of microtubules, one can control the nanotubes geometric parameters important in biomaterials applications. The basic geometry is the shape of nanoparticles, which influences these parameters tremendously with different aspect ratios. For example, nanoscale cylindrical particles with higher aspect ratios (diameter of 150 nm and height of 450 nm) internalized rapidly (5.2% of cells/min) into the cervical cancer HeLa cells in comparison to the symmetrical particles with lower aspect ratios (diameter of 200 nm and height of 200 nm) at a lower rate (1.2% of cells/min) as reported by Gratton et al. (2008). The cellular uptake depends on a shape of a nanoparticle and ultimately the designing of the nanoparticle for effective nanomedicine delivery (Chun, 2008; Brazil, 2016). Nogales et al. (2003) had reported tubulin ring structures in presence of divalent cations having stabilizing effects. The ring curvature is due to a kink between dimers and a kink at monomer–monomer interface of similar or decreased magnitude. Cheng and Stevens (2014) studied the self-assembly of tubular structures from macromolecular monomers with multiple binding sites on their surfaces and lock-and-key interactions to obtain controlled, self-assembled tubule pitch (strength of vertical interaction > lateral interaction strength in microtubules). These unique properties of microtubules can be applied in nanoscience to create supramolecular systems. A monomer is a single nanoparticle with self-assembled tubular structures mimicking microtubules.
Materials scientists are motivated by technological advancements to alter or tailor the material of interest. This process has lead to discovery of a new class of functional materials and superior functionality as evidenced by a novel concept in the field of nanotechnology and microtubule dynamics. This commentary is based on the work published in Nature Materials in 2014 by Ojeda-Lopez et al. (2014) from University of California and other institutions who unveiled a remarkable change in the architecture of microtubule cytoskeletal assembly called as the inverted tubulin tubules. This conformational switch was induced by a polyamine spermine with 4+ cationic charge. The transition from bundles of Taxol-stabilized microtubules (26 nm) to inverted tubulin tubules bundled phase (40.4 nm) was detected by transmission electron microscopy and synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). These compact polymeric assemblies resembled like a stack of rings with the inside-out model system, wherein the outer surface of inverted tubulin tubules corresponds to the inner lumen of microtubules (Figure 1). The different aspects of hierarchically ordered nanostructures, electrostatic interactions, conformational transition, and nanoparticle assemblies have been elucidated. Experimental results have shown that the microtubules lateral and vertical surfaces cause the transition to form inverted tubulin tubule structures. SAXS data have shown microtubules bundled at 15 mM spermine concentration, whereas, at 30 mM, it was completely in the inverted tubulin tubule bundled phase at room temperature after 10 days. This suggested that the ring formation leading to such inverted structures are induced by highly charged spermine localized in small volume between the lateral contacts in microtubule. Spermine lowers the straight-to-curved energy barrier with increasing concentrations. In addition, at 2.5 mM constant spermine concentration at ~2.5°C, the transformation to inverted phase occurred rapidly after 12 h in contrast to stable microtubule bundled phase for >10 days at room temperature (Ojeda-Lopez et al., 2014). The structural properties of microtubules are crucial for nanotechnological applications. Needleman et al. (2004) had reported higher-order, nanometer scale microtubule assemblies in the presence of large trivalent, tetravalent, and pentavalent counterions form nanowires, sieves, tightly packed hexagonal bundles due to the large internal volume. Whereas, in the presence of small divalent cations, highly anisotropic living necklace bundles were formed due to the large surface area. Thus, microtubule bundling architectures of controlled dimensions as templates can be tailored for miniaturized materials. From the technological viewpoint, these nanomaterials find interesting applications in microtubule-binding drug, MAP-tau protein, dynamin protein, tubulin GTPase enzyme (Safinya et al., 2011; Ojeda-Lopez et al., 2014), and DNA gene (Koltover et al., 1998) encapsulation systems in the inside luminal surface of microtubules and release on triggered disassembly. They also find applicability in circuitry components such as carbon nanotubes and conducting polymers, thermoresponsive polymer (Thess et al., 1996; Kaiser, 2001; Needleman et al., 2004; Schroeder et al., 2013), in hierarchical nanostructures templates such as liposomes–microtubule complexes (Raviv et al., 2005; Safinya et al., 2011), and in biosensing devices (Malcos and Hancock, 2011).
Figure 1
In conclusion, microtubules represent an ideal biopolymer for investigating the nanoscale superstructures. The work by Ojeda-Lopez and colleagues represents a new strategy for nanoinspired structures with well-defined shape and reversed surfaces (i.e., inside luminal surface of microtubules) via a small molecule, spermine triggered conformation switch in comparison to the conventional straight polymeric microtubule structures. The assembly and disassembly of microtubules forms a novel, solid platform for supernanostructures with on-demand triggered release of encapsulated biomolecules and distinct functions. The quest for innovative biomaterials like microtubules is a unique advancement in nanoscience and nanotechnology.
Statements
Author contributions
The author contributed in conceptualization and writing of this commentary.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BertalanZ.La PortaC. A.MaiatoH.ZapperiS. (2014). Conformational mechanism for the stability of microtubule-kinetochore attachments. Biophys. J.107, 289–300.10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.004
2
BrazilR. (2016). Shaping up at the nanoscale. Chemis. World13, 62–65.
3
ChengS.StevensM. J. (2014). Self-assembly of chiral tubules. Soft Matter10, 510–518.10.1039/c3sm52631c
4
ChunA. L. (2008). Nanoparticles: shape also matters. Nat. Nanotechnol.10.1038/nnano.2008.265
5
GrattonS. E.RoppP. A.PohlhausP. D.LuftJ. C.MaddenV. J.NapierM. E.et al (2008). The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.105, 11613–11618.10.1073/pnas.0801763105
6
GröschelA. H.WaltherA.LöblingT. I.SchacherF. H.SchmalzH.MüllerA. H. (2013). Guided hierarchical co-assembly of soft patchy nanoparticles. Nature503, 247–251.10.1038/nature12610
7
KaiserA. B. (2001). Electronic transport properties of conducting polymers and carbon nanotubes. Rep. Prog. Phys.64, 1–49.10.1088/0034-4885/64/1/201
8
KatsukiM.DrummondD. R.CrossR. A. (2014). Ectopic A-lattice seams destabilize microtubules. Nat. Commun.5, 3094.10.1038/ncomms4094
9
KoltoverI.SaldittT.RadlerJ. O.SafinyaC. R. (1998). An inverted hexagonal phase of cationic liposome-DNA complexes related to DNA release and delivery. Science281, 78–81.10.1126/science.281.5373.78
10
MalcosJ. L.HancockW. O. (2011). Engineering tubulin: microtubule functionalization approaches for nanoscale device applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.90, 1–10.10.1007/s00253-011-3140-7
11
NeedlemanD. J.Ojeda-LopezM. A.RavivU.MillerH. P.WilsonL.SafinyaC. R. (2004). Higher-order assembly of microtubules by counterions: from hexagonal bundles to living necklaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.101, 16099–16103.10.1073/pnas.0406076101
12
NogalesE.WangH. W.NiederstrasserH. (2003). Tubulin rings: which way do they curve. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.13, 256–261.10.1016/S0959-440X(03)00029-0
13
Ojeda-LopezM. A.NeedlemanD. J.SongC.GinsburgA.KohlP. A.LiY.et al (2014). Transformation of taxol-stabilized microtubules into inverted tubulin tubules triggered by a tubulin conformation switch. Nat. Mater.13, 195–203.10.1038/nmat3858
14
RavivU.NeedlemanD. J.LiY.MillerH. P.WilsonL.SafinyaC. R. (2005). Cationic liposome-microtubule complexes: pathways to the formation of two-state lipid-protein nanotubes with open or closed ends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.102, 11167–11172.10.1073/pnas.0502183102
15
SafinyaC. R.RavivU.NeedlemanD. J.ZidovskaA.ChoiM. C.Ojeda-LopezM. A.et al (2011). Nanoscale assembly in biological systems: from neuronal cytoskeletal proteins to curvature stabilizing lipids. Adv. Mater.23, 2260–2270.10.1002/adma.201004647
16
SchroederV.KortenT.LinkeH.DiezS.MaximovI. (2013). Dynamic guiding of motor driven microtubules on electrically heated, smart polymer tracks. Nano Lett.13, 3434–3438.10.1021/nl402004s
17
ThessA.LeeR.NikolaevP.DaiH.PetitP.RobertJ.et al (1996). Crystalline ropes of metallic carbon nanotubes. Science273, 483–487.10.1126/science.273.5274.483
Summary
Keywords
biomaterials, hierarchical nanostructures, microtubules geometry, nanoscale delivery, reverse conformation, spermine
Citation
Poojari RJ (2016) Commentary: Transformation of Taxol-Stabilized Microtubules into Inverted Tubulin Tubules Triggered by a Tubulin Conformation Switch. Front. Mater. 3:57. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2016.00057
Received
21 September 2016
Accepted
07 December 2016
Published
23 December 2016
Volume
3 - 2016
Edited by
Malcolm Xing, University of Manitoba, Canada
Reviewed by
Xiaozhong Qiu, Southern Medical University, China; Chuanglong He, Donghua University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2016 Poojari.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Radhika J. Poojari, drradhikapoojari@gmail.com
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Biomaterials, a section of the journal Frontiers in Materials
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.