Abstract
Particle addition is an important method to prepare foam metal, and it is of great significance to clarify the mechanism of particle stabilizing liquid metal foam. In this paper, ethanol-water solution system is used to simulate liquid melt foam. By changing the wettability of particles to adjust the distribution position of particles in foam, two types of particles with different wettability are added, which are mixed and optimized in a certain proportion to improve the foam stability as much as possible. The main mechanism is that the large wetting angle particles at the gas-liquid interface to slow down the gas migration, while small wetting angle particles exist in the liquid film, which can reduce the liquid drainage velocity. The experimental results show that the effect of particle wettability on foam structure is greater than that on viscosity enhancement. The particles with large wetting angle are beneficial to the formation and stability of foam, and the particles with small wetting angle cannot stabilize the foam alone. The effect of two types of particle combinations with different wettability on foam stability is better than that of single type of particle. Considering the height and uniformity of the foam structure, the optimal particle combination is finally obtained.
Introduction
As one of the most potential new functional materials, closed-cell metal foam has a wide application prospect in various fields such as military industry, fire protection and aerospace because of its characteristics of light mass, large specific strength, and large specific stiffness (Banhart, 2013; Liu et al., 2013; Xu and Hao, 2014). For example, the foam sandwich plate with foam aluminum as the intermediate core layer has been used for trains and other vehicles (Zu et al., 2011), which can not only reduce the weight of the vehicles and save energy, but also can be used as a collision absorber to improve safety performance (Banhart, 2005; Garcia-Moreno, 2016). Moreover, with small thermal conductivity and light quality (Wang et al., 2016; Li et al., 2020), the closed-cell metal foam is expected to become a new insulation material (Zhu et al., 2004).
In foam metal preparation process, particles or other elements are usually added to improve the stability of foam structure. For example, Ca is added to the melt and stirred in the ambient atmosphere to form the oxide inside metal melts to achieve foam stability, which is also called thickening (Miyoshi et al., 2000; Song et al., 2000; Heim et al., 2017; Cheng et al., 2018). Moreover, Fe or Si has been added in the basic alloy AlSi9Mg0.6 in the first stage of solidification of eutectic alloys to foam Primary Fe and Si-rich crystals which can improve the foam stability (Heim et al., 2018). Furthermore, Mg has also been used as thickener to stabilize the foams (Heim et al., 2015). And some studies have shown that Mg addition can results in the formation of MgAl2O4 particles which stabilize the foams (Bhogi and Mukherjee, 2017). Such compounds can inhibit the liquid drainage process inside the liquid film. Besides, ceramic particles such as SiC (Wang and Shi, 2003; Elbir et al., 2003; Afshar et al., 2017; Kumar and Gokhale, 2018) are added to directly increase viscosity, thus increasing the stability of foam structure and improving the uniformity of cell pores. However, the effect of the particle on the stability of foam structure and its mechanism are not the same. Hosseini et al. (2016) found that most of the SiC particles were distributed around the foaming agent particles, thus improving the foam structure. Kumar et al. (2014) observed that the SiC particles did not gather in large quantities at the interface, but were distributed inside the cell wall, presumably stabilizing the foam by increasing viscosity. However, the information about wettability of SiC in literatures is insufficient. It is possible that the pretreatment of particles in the experimental process is different, resulting in different wetting angles, which affects the different distribution positions of SiC particles in metal foam. Beside SiC particles, Al2O3 or SiO2 particles have been added in the melt by stirring method (Leitlmeier et al., 2002; Babcsan et al., 2004; Garcia-Moreno et al., 2005). On the other hand, it should be pointed out that the above methods of adding different elements also stabilize the foam by generating particles.
However, there are different explanations for the mechanism of particle stabilized metal foam. Liu et al. (2011) found that the wettability of particles has a greater effect on foam stability than the viscosity enhancement. Some researchers have also studied the relationship between particle wetting angle and foam stability. Kaptay (2003) believed that the optimum wetting angle range of ceramic particle stabilized metal foam is 70°–86°. Sun and Gao (2002) believed that the optimum wetting angle range is 75°–85°, and the foam has a better cell structure in this range. Also another study shows that the optimal wetting angle is 90° for foam stability (Kaptay, 2012).
It is difficult to adjust the wettability of ceramic particles quantitatively during the preparation of foam metal. On the other hand, the distribution position of particles in foam can be regulated by changing the wettability of particles in ethanol-water solution. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to stabilize the foam by adding two types of particles with different wetting angle, and to maximize the role of stabilization foam by changing different proportions. The wetting angle of particles is adjusted by changing the solution composition. It is expected that this work will provide a new insight for the synergistic preparation of foam metals based on different wettability of two particles. The paper is organized as follows: Experiment introduces experiment and explains in detail. In Effect of Wettability of Single Type Particles–Effect of Size of Single Type Particles, the effects of wettability, concentration and size of single type particles are presented and analyzed in detail to quantify the range of particle parameters. Effect of Particle Combinations With Different Wettability shows the effect of particle combinations with different wettability on foam structure and stability. In Optimization of Particle Combinations With Different Wettability, the particle combinations with different wettability are optimized based on the foam structure and foam height. Finally, the conclusions are drawn in Conclusion.
Experiment
An ethanol-water system was used to simulate the metal melt foam. Water and ethanol can form a continuous insoluble solution, which is similar to molten metal. By changing the composition of ethanol-water solution, the wetting angle of particles can be controlled to analyze the influence of particle wetting properties on the foam structure and stability. On the other hand, the PTFE and PVC particles, similar to SiC in Al, are inert in the ethanol-water solution. Furthermore, the wettability of PTFE and PVC particles is also different under the same solution and decreases with the increasing volume fraction of ethanol. Therefore, the PTFE and PVC particles (Dongguan, China, Xingwang Co., Ltd.) with different size are used to simulate the effects of ceramic particles with different wetting properties on the foam structure and stability. In addition, no surfactant was added. The particle parameters are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
| PTFE particle | PVC particle | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particle size (μm) | 0.5 | 5 | 20 | 48 | 270 |
| Particle density (g/cm3) | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.3 |
Parameters of particles in experiments.
The foam was prepared by the same method as literature (Sun and Gao, 2002). The main steps are as follows. The corresponding ethanol-water solution was used to clean the test tube. Then the 10 g of ethanol-water solution and particles were added into the test tube. The test plug was pressed to shake until the foam volume no longer increases. After generating a certain height of foam, the test tube is perpendicular to the horizontal plane. Photos were taken after 2 and 10 min, respectively. Each group of experiments was repeated five times to avoid experimental contingency. It should be pointed out that the foam height prepared under the same conditions is basically the same during the experiment.
The photos were imported into software Image-Pro Plus 6.0. The foam profile was determined based on the processed image. Then the average size of foam cell can be obtained. The viscosity of the suspension after adding particles was measured by rotary viscometer (NDJ-9S, Shanghai, China, Pingxuan Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.), and the corresponding viscosity value was recorded after stirring. The contact angle meter (JC300DI, Sweden, Biolin Scientific Co., Ltd.) was used to measure the corresponding wetting angle by the drop method. Besides, the optical microscopy (PH50, Jiangxi, China, Phoenix Optical Instrument Co., Ltd.) was used to observe and photograph the microstructure of foam.
Results and Discussion
Effect of Wettability of Single Type Particles
The foam was prepared with PTFE particles of 20 μm size, and the mass fraction was 1.0 wt%. By changing the ethanol concentration to adjust the wetting angle of the particles, the effect of different wetting angles on the stability of the foam was analyzed.
Figure 1 shows the photo of foam at different ethanol concentrations after 10 min. The foam structure remains intact when the ethanol concentration is 40.0 vol%. The particles in the solution agglomerate to form flocculent, and there is no foam structure when the ethanol concentration is 20.0 vol%. Moreover, the cells in the upper part of the foam merge and burst when the ethanol concentration is 30.0 vol% or 50.0 vol%, which can be found in Figure 1 (Part A).
FIGURE 1
Figure 2 shows that the difference of foam height after 2 and 10 min is the least when the ethanol concentration is 40.0 vol%. Therefore, the corresponding wetting angle is the best value, which is consistent with the experimental results in the literature (Sun and Gao, 2002). Moreover, When the ethanol concentration is 20.0 vol%, the foam lifetime is between 2 and 10 min because the foam disappears after 10 min. When the ethanol concentration is between 30 and 50%, the corresponding foam lifetime exceeds 10 min.
FIGURE 2
Effect of Concentration of Single Type Particles
Figure 3 shows the structure of foams adding different particle concentration when the ethanol concentration is 40%. The foam is not generated without adding particles. The foam height increases with the increasing particle concentration, and the size of foam structure becomes obviously smaller, which is consistent with the experimental results in the literature (Lin et al., 2017). When the particle concentration increases to 4.0 wt%, due to the poor wettability, the particles accumulates inside the foam structure after the foam formation, which leads to dense layer at the foam bottom.
FIGURE 3
Figure 4 shows that the apparent viscosity increases from 5.0 mPa s to 5.8 mPa s, when the particle concentration increases to 2.0 wt%. And the apparent viscosity is almost unchanged when the content changes from 2.0 wt% to 4.0 wt%. Thus, there are other mechanisms to stabilize the foam in addition to viscosity enhancement.
FIGURE 4
Figure 5 shows the plateau boundary formed by three bubbles. Since the wetting angle of PTFE particles is 76°, PTFE particles are adsorbed at the gas-liquid interface in the foam structure, and there are almost no particles in the liquid film. Therefore, the main mechanism of the PTFE particles with poor wettability in the foam structure is the influence of the distribution position, rather than the viscosity enhancement.
FIGURE 5
Effect of Size of Single Type Particles
In order to analyze the effect of particle size on foam stability, the experiment is carried out as shown in Table 2. At the same time, a group of high wettability particles were added for comparison.
TABLE 2
| PTFE particle | PVC particle | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particle concentration (wt%) | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Particle size (μm) | 0.5 | 5 | 48 | 270 |
Parameters of particles in experiments.
The PTFE particles of size 48 μmm,5, and 0.5 μm were added under the condition of ethanol concentration of 40.0 vol% and particle concentration of 2.0 wt%, respectively. The experimental results are as follows. The particles formed flocculent in the process of tube oscillation, and no foam structure was formed when the particle size is 48 μm. The bubble quickly disappears and cannot form foam when the particle size is 5 and 0.5 μm.
As shown in Figure 6, the blue circle represents the particle. The dark gray area represents the bubble. The light gray area represents the liquid film. The yellow line represents the gas-liquid interface. And the arrow represents the direction of liquid evolution.
FIGURE 6
Figure 6B shows that the particles are close to the liquid side when the wetting angle of the particles is small, so it is easy to separate from the gas-liquid interface. If the viscosity enhancement effect is insufficient, the particles are easy to be taken away during the drainage process. Figure 6C shows that the particles are easily taken away during the liquid drainage process when the particle size is too small, and finally accumulate at the bottom of the foam. Therefore, as shown in Figure 6A, when the wettability of particles is poor and the size is moderate, it is an ideal situation. Moreover, our experimental results also show that the foam disappears quickly after foam formation for PVC particles with high wettability, which proves that foam stability is related to the wettability of particles. The main mechanism is that the wettability of particles determines the relative position between particles and gas-liquid interface.
Effect of Particle Combinations With Different Wettability
According to the above analysis, the particles with large wetting angle are distributed at the gas-liquid interface, which plays a decisive role in stabilizing the foam structure, and the particles with small wetting angle are distributed inside the liquid, which can stabilize the foam structure by increasing viscosity and suppress the drainage behavior. Therefore, the effect of particles in the foam structure is different with the different wetting angles. It can be speculated that adding large wetting angle particles to form foam. Moreover, adding small wetting angle particles can inhibit the drainage, and further stabilizing the foam structure. That is, two particles with different wettability can work together to optimize the foam structure.
Figure 7 shows that there is almost no dense layer at the bottom of the foam formed by mixing two types of particles compared with single type of particles, which indicates that the combination of the two types of particles has a better suppression effect on drainage behavior. At the same time, the foam structure is obviously better than that of single type of particles. The reason is that the wettability of PVC particles is good on the condition of 40.0 vol% ethanol concentration and can be distributed within the liquid film. The foam cannot be generated when PVC particles are added separately. However, after mixing with PTFE particles, foam can be formed and stabilized. It shows that two types of particle combinations with different wettability can effectively improve the foam stability.
FIGURE 7
As shown in Table 3, according to the PTFE particle concentration, four groups were divided. The optimal particle concentration combination can be obtained by comparing the foam structure under different particle combinations.
TABLE 3
| Group | PTFE concentration (wt%) | PVC concentration (wt%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| B | 2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| C | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| D | 3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
Group of particle combinations.
Figure 8 shows the foam structure with different particle combinations. The white area represents the overall height of the foam. Irregular color regions represent different cells of foam. The white area at the bottom of the foam represents the dense layer of particles. The cell size decreases gradually from top to bottom because of the bubble coalescence. With the increasing PTFE particle concentration, the PTFE particles at the gas-liquid interface increase and the stability of the foam is enhanced, so the cell size of the group B becomes smaller and the large bubble in the upper part of the foam disappears, while the cell shape of group C and D is approximately circular. At the same time, with the increasing PTFE particle concentration, the thickness of dense layer at the bottom of foam increases gradually.
FIGURE 8
In order to evaluate the uniformity of foam structure, the foam is divided into two regions along the height direction, and then the average size of bubbles in the two regions is measured, respectively.
Figure 9 shows that the curve of average size deviation changes with the increasing PVC particle concentration under different PTFE particle concentration conditions. When the concentration of PVC particles is low, the bubbles are easy to merge, which leads to the increase of foam height, but the overall uniformity of foam becomes worse. As the concentration of PVC particles increases further, the effect of suppression of drainage behavior increases, and there is no bubble merger at the top of the foam. Therefore, the foam height decreases and the overall uniformity of the foam become better. After that, the PVC particles aggregate, and the liquid film widens, which accelerates the drainage. Then the upper part of the foam merges to form a large bubble and collapses, causing a reduced foam height and a dense layer at the bottom of the foam.
FIGURE 9
Optimization of Particle Combinations With Different Wettability
When evaluating the optimal particle combination of each group, the uniformity of cell size is taken as the main standard, followed by foam height. And the optimal particle combinations of each group are shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4
| Group | PTFE concentration (wt%) | PVC concentration (wt%) |
|---|---|---|
| a (A group) | 1.5 | 0.9 |
| b (B group) | 2.0 | 0.6 |
| c (C group) | 2.5 | 1.2 |
| d (D group) | 3.0 | 1.2 |
Results of optimal particle combination.
Figure 10 shows the cell size distribution under optimal particle combinations in Table 4. Dmean is the average diameter of the foam cell after Gaussian normal fitting. With the increasing PTFE particle concentration, the average size of foam cell decreases and the size distribution is more concentrated. The average size of the group d reached the minimum, and the size distribution was the most concentrated, mainly in the range of 0.4–1.0 mm, accounting for 68% of the total.
FIGURE 10
Figure 11 shows the corresponding foam height of four optimal particle combinations. The foam height is random because the uniformity of foam structure is taken as the main factor. If only the uniformity of the foam structure is considered, the particle combination of the group d is the best. Furthermore, if the uniformity of the foam structure and the foam height are considered simultaneously, the particle content of the c group is optimal.
FIGURE 11
Conclusion
The ethanol solution is used to simulate the formation of metal foam. Two types of particles with different wettability were grouped to compare the corresponding foam height and foam structure. The effect of particle wettability on foam structure is greater than that of viscosity enhancement. The particles with large wetting angle are beneficial to the formation and stability of foam, and the particles with small wetting angle cannot stabilize the foam alone. The effect of two types of particle combinations with different wettability on foam stability is better than that of single type particles. The main mechanism is that the particles with large wetting angle exist at the gas-liquid interface to slow the gas migration, while the particles with small wetting angle exist in the liquid film and can reduce the liquid drainage velocity. Considering the foam height and foam structure, the optimal particle combination is obtained.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
DG contributed to the conception of the study and manuscript preparation; JL performed the experiment and the data analyses; HL and WH helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the open funds of Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University (NEU-EPM-014), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51304038) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N180904007).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AfsharM.MirbagheriM. H.MovahediN. (2017). Effect of SiC Particle Size on the Mechanical Properties of Closed Aluminum Foams. Mater. Test.59 (6), 571–574. 10.3139/120.111035
2
BabcsánN.LeitlmeierD.DegischerH. P.BanhartJ. (2004). The Role of Oxidation in Blowing Particle-Stabilised Aluminium Foams. Adv. Eng. Mater.6 (6), 421–428. 10.1002/adem.200405144
3
BanhartJ. (2005). Aluminium Foams for Lighter Vehicles. Ijvd37 (2-3), 114–125. 10.1504/ijvd.2005.006640
4
BanhartJ. (2013). Light-Metal Foams-History of Innovation and Technological Challenges. Adv. Eng. Mater.15 (3), 82–111. 10.1002/adem.201200217
5
BhogiS.MukherjeeM. (2017). Foam Stabilization by Magnesium. Mater. Lett.200, 118–120. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.100
6
ChengY.LiY.ChenX.LiuZ.ZhouX.WangN. (2018). Optimizing Calcium Addition for Fabricating Aluminum Foams with Different Pore Sizes. Mater. Trans.59 (8), 1367–1374. 10.2320/matertrans.M2018131
7
ElbirS.YilmazS.ToksoyA. K.GudenM. (2003). SiC-particulate Aluminum Composite Foams Produced by Powder Compacts: Foaming and Compression Behavior. J. Mater. Sci.38 (23), 4745–4755. 10.1023/A:1027427102837
8
Garcia-MorenoF.BabcsanN.BanhartJ. (2005). X-ray Radioscopy of Liquid Metalfoams: Influence of Heating Profile, Atmosphere and Pressure. Colloids Surf. a-Physicochemical Eng. Aspects263 (1-3), 290–294. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.12.044
9
Garcia-MorenoF. (2016). Commercial Applications of Metal Foams: Their Properties and Production. Materials9 (2), 85. 10.3390/ma9020085
10
HeimK.García-MorenoF.BanhartJ. (2018). Particle Size and Fraction Required to Stabilise Aluminium alloy Foams Created by Gas Injection. Scripta Materialia153, 54–58. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.04.041
11
HeimK.Vinod-KumarG. S.García-MorenoF.BanhartJ. (2017). Stability of Various Particle-Stabilised Aluminium Alloys Foams Made by Gas Injection. J. Mater. Sci.52 (11), 6401–6414. 10.1007/s10853-017-0874-3
12
HeimK.Vinod-KumarG. S.Garcia-MorenoF.RackA.BanhartJ. (2015). Stabilisation of Aluminium Foams and Films by the Joint Action of Dispersed Particles and Oxide Films. Acta Materialia99, 313–324. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.064
13
HosseiniS. M.HabibolahzadehA.PetráňováV.Něme?EkJ. (2016). Influence of Nano-SiCp on the Foamability and Microstructure of Al/TiH2 Foam Sheet Manufactured by Continual Annealing and Roll-Bonding Process. Mater. Des.97 (5), 483–491. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.106
14
KaptayG. (2003). Interfacial Criteria for Stabilization of Liquid Foams by Solid Particles. Colloids Surf. a-Physicochemical Eng. Aspects230 (1-3), 67–80. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2003.09.016
15
KaptayG. (2012). On the Optimum Contact Angle of Stability of Foams by Particles. Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci.170 (1-2), 87–88. 10.1016/j.cis.2011.12.002
16
KumarN. V. R.GokhaleA. A. (2018). Role of Temperature and SiCP Parameters in Stability and Quality of Al-Si-Mg/SiC Foams. JOM70 (6), 823–828. 10.1007/s11837-018-2825-0
17
KumarN. V. R.RaoN. R.GokhaleA. A. (2014). Effect of SiC Particle Content on Foaming and Mechanical Properties of Remelted and Diluted A356/SiC Composite. Mater. Sci. Eng. A598 (26), 343–349. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.050
18
LeitlmeierD.DegischerH. P.FlanklH. J. (2002). Development of a Foaming Process for Particulate Reinforced Aluminum Melts. Adv. Eng. Mater.4 (10), 735–740. 10.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10<735::Aid-adem735>3.0.Co;2-y
19
LiJ.GengD.ZhangR.HuoX.WangP. (2020). Effective Thermal Conductivity Modeling of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam and Heat Transfer Simulation. Rare Metal Mater. Eng.49 (5), 1637–1642. 10/CNKI:SUN:COSE.0.2020-05-024
20
LinH.LuoH.ZhangZ.MaJ.YaoG. (2017). Study on Improvement of Aluminum Foams by Rapid Foaming. Mater. Lett.188 (1), 288–290. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.10.109
21
LiuH.CaoZ. K.LuoH. J.ShiJ. C.YaoG. C. (2013). Performance of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foams Subjected to Impact Loading. Mater. Sci. Eng. A570, 27–31. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.094
22
LiuX. N.LiY. X.ChenX.FanX. L. (2011). Effect of Ca on Particulate Dispersion and Foam Stability in Gas Injection Foaming Process. Chin. J. Nonferrous Met.21 (2), 392–398. 10.1016/S1872-5805(11)60064-4
23
MiyoshiT.ItohM.AkiyamaS.KitaharaA. (2000). ALPORAS Aluminum Foam: Production Process, Properties, and Applications. Adv. Eng. Mater.2 (4), 179–183. 10.1002/(sici)1527-2648(200004)2:4<179::aid-adem179>3.0.co;2-g
24
SongZ. L.MaL. Q.WuZ. J.HeD. P. (2000). Effects of Viscosity on Cellular Structure of Foamed Aluminum in Foaming Process. J. Mater. Sci.35 (1), 15–20. 10.1023/a:1004715926692
25
SunY. Q.GaoT. (2002). The Optimum Wetting Angle for the Stabilization of Liquid-Metal Foams by Ceramic Particles: Experimental Simulations. Metallurgical Mater. Trans. A33 (10), 3285–3292. 10.1007/s11661-002-0315-y
26
WangD. Q.ShiZ. Y. (2003). Effect of Ceramic Particles on Cell Size and wall Thickness of Aluminum Foam. Mater. Sci. Eng. A361, 45–49. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00557-4
27
WangH.ZhouX.-y.LongB.YangJ.LiuH.-z. (2016). Thermal Properties of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foams Prepared by Melt Foaming Technology. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China26 (12), 3147–3153. 10.1016/s1003-6326(16)64446-1
28
XuZ. B.HaoH. (2014). Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Effectiveness of Aluminum Foams with Different Porosity. J. Alloys Comp.617, 207–213. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.188
29
ZhuH.SankarB. V.HaftkaR. T.VenkataramanS.BlosserM. (2004). Optimization of Functionally Graded Metallic Foam Insulation under Transient Heat Transfer Conditions. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optimization28 (5), 349–355. 10.1007/s00158-004-0463-3
30
ZuG. Y.SongB. N.GuanZ. H.WangL.YaoG. C. (2011). Preparation of Aluminum Foam Sandwich by Rolling-bonding/Powder Metallurgy Foaming Technology. J. Wuhan Univ. Technology-Materials Sci. Edition26 (4), 671–674. 10.1007/s11595-011-0289-y
Summary
Keywords
metal foam, particle, combination, wettability, stability
Citation
Geng D, Li J, Li H and Huang W (2021) Effects of Particle Combinations With Different Wettability on Foam Structure and Stability. Front. Mater. 8:699187. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2021.699187
Received
11 May 2021
Accepted
30 July 2021
Published
11 August 2021
Volume
8 - 2021
Edited by
Miloslav Pekař, Brno University of Technology, Czechia
Reviewed by
Anna Trybala, Loughborough University, United Kingdom
Hock Jin Quah, University of Science Malaysia, Malaysia
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Geng, Li, Li and Huang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dianqiao Geng, gengdianqiao@epm.neu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Colloidal Materials and Interfaces, a section of the journal Frontiers in Materials
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.