ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Experimental vs. modeled water use in mature Norway spruce (Picea abies) exposed to elevated CO2
- 1School of Applied Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
- 2Forest Ecology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 3Institute of Botany, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- 4Centre of Excellence for Climate Change, Woodland and Forest Health, School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- 5New Zealand Forest Research Institute (SCION), Rotorua, New Zealand
Rising levels of atmospheric CO2 have often been reported to reduce plant water use. Such behavior is also predicted by standard equations relating photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and atmospheric CO2 concentration, which form the core of dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). Here, we provide first results from a free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment with naturally growing, mature (35 m) Picea abies (L.) (Norway spruce) and compare them to simulations by the DGVM LPJ-GUESS. We monitored sap flow, stem water deficit, stomatal conductance, leaf water potential, and soil moisture in five 35–40 m tall CO2-treated (550 ppm) trees over two seasons. Using LPJ-GUESS, we simulated this experiment using climate data from a nearby weather station. While the model predicted a stable reduction of transpiration of between 9% and 18% (at concentrations of 550–700 ppm atmospheric CO2), the combined evidence from various methods characterizing water use in our experimental trees suggest no changes in response to future CO2 concentrations. The discrepancy between the modeled and the experimental results may be a scaling issue: while dynamic vegetation models correctly predict leaf-level responses, they may not sufficiently account for the processes involved at the canopy and ecosystem scale, which could offset the first-order stomatal response.
Whether and if so how plants respond to increasing atmospheric CO2 is critical for future ecosystem carbon and water cycling and largely depends on the response of the stomata that control both carbon (C) uptake and water loss. Several authors have suggested that water-related effects of elevated CO2 (eCO2) on stomatal closure might be or become more important than immediate effects on carbon uptake (Morgan et al., 2003; Holtum and Winter, 2010; Hartmann, 2011). One reason for this may be that while stimulated growth and biomass accumulation rarely persist over many years (Körner et al., 2005; Norby et al., 2010; Leuzinger et al., 2011b), but see McCarthy et al. (2010), stomatal responses tend to be sustained (see Holtum and Winter, 2010 for a review). For grassland, there is compelling experimental evidence that stimulated biomass production under eCO2 is in fact a consequence of soil water savings resulting from reduced stomatal conductance (Niklaus et al., 1998; Morgan et al., 2004). Such a water-mediated CO2-effect is expected to be more pronounced in water-limited ecosystems, although under extremely dry conditions it has not been observed (Housman et al., 2006). The experimental conditions (species composition tested, CO2-administration method, laboratory vs. field experiment, ontogenetic stage of test plants) and particularly the experimental duration are fundamental for the interpretation of net water use under eCO2 (Norby et al., 1999). For example, initial CO2-induced increases in total leaf area per unit land area leaf area index, (LAI) in young, rapidly expanding systems will inevitably lead to increased stand transpiration, irrespective of the leaf-level stomatal response (Uddling et al., 2008; Tricker et al., 2009). Similarly, the long-term response (>10 years) often differs from measurements over only a few years (Körner, 2006). The scaling from first-order stomatal responses to stand water use therefore requires careful consideration of the interactions between the water- and the carbon cycle across temporal and spatial scales.
Overall, there is a striking lack of data from mature forests as most of the evidence for water savings under eCO2 still comes from grass- or shrub ecosystems, or from branch bag experiments on mature trees (Roberntz and Stockfors, 1998; Pataki et al., 2000; Morgan et al., 2004). No eCO2 experiments on tall trees exist in the tropical forests (Körner, 2009). Worldwide, there are only five experiments testing the effect of future CO2 concentrations on entire tree crowns using the free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) method (Körner et al., 2005; Norby et al., 2005), excluding whole tree chamber and agricultural experiments (Medhurst et al., 2006; Kimball et al., 2007). Although those five studies were conducted with different species and in a variety of biomes, three of them roughly agree on reduced total stand water use under eCO2 of c. 10% (Warren et al., 2011). The remaining two were young, expanding systems where the transpiration response to CO2 was dominated by a stimulation of LAI and therefore increased stand water use (Uddling et al., 2008; Tricker et al., 2009). Responses in leaf-level stomatal conductance (gs) to eCO2 are less consistent in the five large forest FACE experiments mentioned (−4% to −44%), but approximately match findings from meta-analyses including experiments with woody plants in branch bag and greenhouse experiments (−21% Medlyn et al., 2001, −18% Ainsworth and Rogers, 2007, and no significant response from a much earlier review predominantly on seedlings and saplings, Curtis and Wang, 1998). At the Swiss Canopy Crane (SCC), where the present study was conducted, stomatal conductance was reduced around 10% in six deciduous tree species, and sap flow by 2–22%, resulting in a reduction of yearly stand transpiration of c. 10% (Cech et al., 2003; Keel et al., 2007; Leuzinger and Körner, 2007). Overall, water savings under eCO2 tend to decline with the duration of the experiment (Medlyn et al., 2001; Leuzinger and Körner, 2010; Leuzinger et al., 2011b), with increasing woodiness (Ainsworth and Rogers, 2007), with increasing age of the studied plants (Medlyn et al., 2001), and from deciduous to coniferous trees (Ellsworth, 1999; Körner et al., 2007). Because the number of short-term experiments with herbaceous or young trees is disproportionately larger than the number of experiments with mature trees, we can assume that water savings under eCO2 tend to be overestimated, particularly because the response is likely to diminish further when scaling up from the individual plant to the landscape level (McNaughton and Jarvis, 1991; Field et al., 1995; Leuzinger and Körner, 2010). A way to circumvent the necessity of scaling up CO2-experiments with young, disturbed systems is Δ13C analysis of tree rings to infer intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE, Francey and Farquhar, 1982; Bert et al., 1997). Penuelas et al. (2011) in a recent review report that iWUE has increased by c. 20% over the past 40 years, with slightly larger responses in broad-leaved relative to coniferous trees. On the other hand, in a study on various species of oak, hornbeam and maple, no change in iWUE was reported based on only 2–3 leaf samples during the twentieth century (Miller-Rushing et al., 2009). Changes in iWUE may originate either from changes in the nominator (leaf-level photosynthesis) or the denominator (stomatal conductance), and thus cannot be used to fill in the lack of FACE experiments to estimate changes in stand transpiration under future CO2 concentrations.
Experimental estimates of leaf-level and whole tree responses are also key to algorithms and their parameterization in dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) and earth system models, and therefore predictions of future vegetation responses and climate feedbacks (Moorcroft, 2006). Stomatal conductance models used in DGVMs predict substantial decreases of gs with a doubling of atmospheric CO2, fundamentally because the substomatal CO2 concentration (Ci) is held approximately constant (Jarvis, 1976; Leuning, 1995; Haxeltine and Prentice, 1996). It is therefore little surprising that DGVMs predict global water savings by the vegetation of around 10–20% (Luo et al., 2008), which lead to increased runoff of mostly a few percent (e.g., Betts et al., 2007; Boucher et al., 2009; Long et al., 2010), matching estimates based on experimental data (Leuzinger and Körner, 2010). However, it is important to note that few of these model results can be validated due to a lack of data, and net responses largely hinge on the way the leaf-level response is scaled up to the canopy and landscape scale. The aim of the present study is to (1) provide novel data on water relations of fully grown Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees under approximately double pre-industrial CO2-conditions, and (2) to discuss these findings in context of simulations of the experiment by the DGVM LPJ-GUESS (Smith et al., 2001; Sitch et al., 2003).
Materials and Methods
The SCC is located in a mature, mixed deciduous forest 15 km south of Basel, Switzerland (47°28′N, 7°30′E, 550 m a.s.l.). The crane gondola allows access to all tree crowns located within the 30 m radius of the jib. The site has a mean January temperature of 2°C and mean July temperature of 19°C, long-term average annual precipitation amounts to 990 mm, two-thirds of which fall during the growing season. The oldest trees are c. 110 years old and reach heights of 35–40 m. Stand density is 415 trees ha−1 (trees >0.1 m breast height diameter), at a stem basal area of 46 m2 ha−1 and a LAI of c. 5. The soil type is a Rendzic Leptosol (WRB) (Rendzina, FAO; Lithic Rendoll, USDA) with an accessible profile depth of at most 25 cm followed by rocky subsoil blending into the calcareous bedrock at 40–90 cm. The soil texture is a loamy clay (pH 5.8 in the top 10 cm). The species mixture includes deciduous trees (Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Carpinus betulus L., and, less abundant, Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Acer campestre L., Prunus avium L.) as well as conifers (Picea abies (L.) Karst., Larix decidua Mill., Pinus sylvestris L., Abies alba Mill.). For more information on the site see (Pepin and Körner, 2002).
Experimental Set-Up and Free Air CO2 Enrichment
Five Norway spruce (P. abies) individuals were selected for CO2 enrichment (550 ppm), together with five control trees, only three of which were accessible with the crane gondola. The treatment was initiated on July 30, 2009. To simulate future atmospheric conditions, pure CO2 was released through laser-punched irrigation tubes woven into the spruce trees with a central supply pipe running up the stem. Sample lines were connected to two infrared gas analyzers (LI-800, Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA), in order to monitor and automatically adjust the amount of CO2 supplied. CO2 enrichment was discontinued when daily temperature maxima did not reach 6°C, or when above-canopy incoming radiation was less than 100 μmol m−2 s−1 (i.e., no night-time CO2 enrichment). On average, the target CO2 concentration of 550 ppm was achieved well: the mean across all sample lines during times of fumigation reached 563 ppm ± 94 s.e. in 2009 and 617 ppm ± 88 in 2010.
Continuous Measurements and Measuring Campaigns
We continuously measured sap flow, stem radius changes, microclimate, and soil moisture. One heat dissipation sap flow sensor (TDP-30, Dynamax, Huston, TX, USA) was used per tree (5 treated, 5 controls), inserted directly into the stem after removing loose bits of bark. The sensors were oriented toward north, water-proofed with silicon paste and insulated with styrofoam and reflecting foil. They remained in the same position for both the 2009 and 2010 growing seasons. Stem radius changes (μm) were recorded with high-precision point dendrometers (ZB06, Natkon, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland), and, together with the sap flow signals, logged to two central data loggers (DL2e, Delta-T Devices Ltd., Cambridge, UK) in 10 min intervals (average over 30 s readings). Soil moisture was logged every 6 h at 0–10 cm depth using “ECH2O Probes” (EC-10, Decagon Devices Ltd., Pullman, Washington, DC). Eleven sensors were distributed around the treated trees, 18 sensors around control trees, logging onto self-contained data loggers (Em50, Decagon). Measurements took place from day of year 134 to 297 (May 14–October 24) in 2009 and from day of year 134 to 267 (May 14–September 24) in 2010. Microclimate (temperature, relative humidity, incoming radiation, and precipitation) was logged above the canopy in 10-min intervals to a DL2e logger (Delta-T Devices Ltd.). Data gaps resulting from occasional logger failure were filled by interpolation based on climate recordings from a nearby weather station (2 km air-line distance).
On three cloudless days (July 29, August 6 2009, and July 14 2010), we measured daily courses (five measurements per tree pre-dawn to dusk) of leaf water potential and stomatal conductance on the five treated trees and the three controls that were accessible with the crane gondola. Two twigs per tree and time window were cut off with a razor blade, needles, bark, and phloem around the cut were removed, and their leaf water potential was measured subsequently using a pressure chamber (SKPM 1400, Skye Instruments, Powys, UK). Only plant material from the fully light-exposed top crown was selected to ensure comparable conditions. Stomatal conductance was measured on current and previous year's needles, removing the needles on two c. 2 cm wide bands to allow the gas-exchange chamber to close. A portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400 XT, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) with a conifer chamber was used for this purpose. Readings were taken as soon as rates of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance remained stable (<5 min). All measurements were taken at full sunlight (>1000 μmol m−2 s−1). Treated trees were measured at their target CO2 concentration of 560 ppm, control trees at ambient CO2 (390 ppm). Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) inside the cuvette was adjusted to ambient conditions. Stomatal conductance was calculated by multiplying the readings with the total leaf area of the samples (harvested at the end of the experiment). Because there were no systematic differences between current year and previous year needles, all analyzes presented here are based on the average values.
Model Specification and Model Runs
We used the DGVM LPJ-GUESS, featuring an accurate representation of detailed plant physiological processes (Smith et al., 2001; Sitch et al., 2003), to simulate our experimental results. The model was run in cohort mode using daily climate data from an official Swiss weather station 11 km north of the study site (Basel-Binningen, Tank et al., 2002). Relative humidity, radiation and temperature data correlated well with weather data recorded at the experimental site (R2-values equal to 0.86, 0.89, and 0.98 respectively), and specific correction factors were applied to simulate long climate time series at the experimental site as closely as possible. A 700-years spin-up period was allowed in order to equilibrate the various carbon pools with the background climate (data from 1901 to 1930 used repeatedly, CO2 concentration at 296 ppm). Thereafter, we considered the period from 1901 to 2110. Atmospheric CO2 concentration was altered in four different ways, all based on the actually measured mean values until 2010: (1) step change to 550 ppm in 2010, (2) step change to 700 ppm in 2010, (3) gradual change to 550 ppm until 2057, and (4) gradual change to 700 ppm until 2100. Because we only considered Norway spruce, only the plant functional type (PFT) “needle-leaved evergreen” was allowed to grow, all other PFTs were suppressed. Soil water storage capacity was set to 80 mm, which is the best estimate determined for a nearby site (see Walthert et al., 2004). Only one patch with a size of 1000 m2 was computed, hence no competition took place in order to simulate the responses of mature coniferous trees. Because forest fires are extremely rare in this region, fire disturbance was suppressed. No further parameter changes or adjustments were made relative to the default version of LPJ-GUESS (Sitch et al., 2003).
Daily transpiration in LPJ is equal to the lower value out of daily water supply and daily water demand. If water supply < water demand, then the available soil water is transpired up to a maximum rate of 5 mm d−1 and thus independent of CO2. On the other hand, if water supply > water demand, stomatal conductance decreases with increasing CO2 because Ci/Ca (intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration) is held constant and photosynthesis is stimulated (Haxeltine and Prentice, 1996). As a result, at a leaf temperature of 20°C, stomatal conductance is reduced c. 35% at 2× pre-industrial CO2 concentration. Transpiration is then calculated from potential evapotranspiration, stomatal conductance and two (constant) scaling parameters.
Data Processing and Statistical Analyses
Stem water deficit was related to the individual's stem radius at the beginning of the experiment and expressed in per mille change from the initial value. The resulting time series were decomposed into radius changes due to changes in stem water storage and a growth component according to the method outlined in (Zweifel et al., 2005). Essentially, this method considers periods between stem radius peaks as stem water deficits (see Figure 1 of Zweifel et al., 2005).
Figure 1. Daily relative sap flow sums of the control and CO2-treated trees, both before (A) and after the CO2-treatment was initiated (B and C). Shown are the medians of each group (n = 5). The bold dotted line represents the 1:1 line, the solid line the linear fit (with dashed lines as 95% confidence intervals). The 1:1 line lies within the confidence intervals where data points are available, suggesting that there was no significant difference between treated and control trees in any of the three periods shown.
Millivolt signals of sap flow sensors were processed as follows to achieve most realistic conditions of zero-flow (R. Zweifel, personal communication): the maximum mV values were converted to temperature differences (ΔT) using a constant factor of 25. Then, ΔT maxima between 3 h and 8 h every night were connected with a straight line. This linearly changing baseline (ΔTmax) was used as the pre-nightly maximum value as in the standard transformation outlined in (Granier, 1985). Because sap flow signals are difficult to interpret as absolute mass flow densities, particularly when exact estimates of the sap wood width and the radial flow distribution are lacking (Leuzinger and Körner, 2007; Leuzinger et al., 2011a), we chose to use only relative sap flow values (Figure 1). Each sap flow time series was therefore standardized to its own pre-treatment maximum (mean of 20 largest values) resulting in time series between 0 and approximately 1, spanning both growing seasons (henceforth called “relative sap flow”). To test treatment-specific differences in daily courses of leaf water potential and stomatal conductance, we used mixed effects models (R package “nlme”) with treatment and time of day as fixed effects and tree as a random effect. Additionally, we used an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) correlation structure to model dependence among observations.
The relationship between stem water deficit (ΔW) and soil moisture (sm) was modeled individually for the pre-treatment and the two FACE periods (season 2009 and 2010) using a 2-parameter Michaelis-Menten-type hyperbola: ΔW = a × sm/(b + sm), where “a” is the asymptote and “b” the soil moisture level at which stem water deficit reaches half of its asymptotic value (Figure 3).
Generally, we tested statistically significant differences between treatments by fitting models with common parameter estimates and varying parameter estimates for each treatment, followed by a comparison of the two models (Figures 2, 4, and 5). The CO2-treatment was considered to affect the variable of interest statistically significantly, if the Akaike information criterion (AIC) was significantly lower in the more complex model (i.e., ΔAIC > 2). To determine the envelope curves for the sap flow-VPD relationships, we calculated the 95th percentiles of relative sap flow (SF95) for every 2 kPa VPDVPD bin and fitted the polynomial model SF95 = a × CO2 + b × VPD + c × VPD2 + d × VPD3, since all other attempts to fit a non-linear model failed. The factor CO2 is the CO2-treatment with the levels 1 (elevated) and 0 (ambient). The interaction term VPD × CO2 was not significant and was therefore dropped. All analyzes were carried out using R version 2.13.0 (R Development Core Team, 2011).
Figure 2. Diurnal water relations data of mature P. abies trees under elevated (bold/filled symbols) and ambient (open symbols) atmospheric CO2, before and after the treatment was initiated, on three cloudless summer days in 2009 and 2010. Panels (A) show relative sap flow (each tree standardized to its pre-treatment maximum, n = 5), panels (B) and (C) show mean leaf water potentials and stomatal conductance from pre-dawn to dusk, and (D) the photosynthetically active radiation (above the canopy, thin line, left hand side axis) and vapor pressure deficit (at canopy height, bold line, and font, right hand side axis). Shaded areas and bars represent one standard error. None of the differences between control and treated trees is significant on any of the 3 days (see text).
Water Relations of P. abies Under Elevated CO2
A comparison of the seasonal relative sap flow sums (median of both treated and control groups) did not show any change when the pre-treatment period was compared to the CO2 enrichment period. (Table 1, Figure 1). The pattern did not differ when wet and dry periods were considered separately (both by soil moisture and VPD conditions). Before the treatment was initiated, the trees designated to be treated with eCO2 tended to show less transpiration (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p = 0.055, Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison of measured and modeled transpiration under control and elevated CO2 conditions, estimated from relative sap flow in P. abies in the experiment, and from total stand transpiration of evergreen needle-leaved trees in the dynamic global vegetation model LPJ-GUESS.
A more detailed look at the daily courses of sap flow, leaf water potential, and stomatal conductance during bright sunny days before and after the start of the treatment confirmed that water consumption in P. abies remained unaffected by CO2 enrichment. Daily courses of sap flow were not significantly different between treatments, neither before nor after treatment initiation (daily sums of relative sap flow, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n = 5, p-values = 0.90, 0.90, 0.79 for left, center and right panel of Figure 2A). Similarly, leaf water potential and stomatal conductance differed with time of day (p-values < 0.0001 for both years and measurements) but not with the treatment: we employed linear mixed effects models with treatment, time and their interaction as fixed factors and tree individuals as random factors. Except for the leaf water potential measurements during the pre-treatment period (left panel of Figure 2B), where the interaction term was significant (p = 0.022), the treatment differences were not significantly different during any day (Figures 2B,C, p-values > 0.1). In both summers, low soil water availability resulted in low pre-dawn leaf water potentials around −1 MPa. During daytime, high VPD values exceeding 2 kPa caused leaf water potentials to drop to values between −1.5 and −2.0 MPa. Stomatal conductance peaked with light intensity and reached values about 100 mmol m−2 s−1 and declined in the course of the afternoon to values below 50 mmol m−2 s−1.
Overall, sap flow was lower on July 14 2010 because of the very high VPD values (maximum of c. 3.5 kPa). All 3 days were cloudless, except for some haziness in the afternoon of July 14 2010. The dent in photoactive radiation (PAR) around 10 am is due to passing shadow from the crane top.
Point dendrometer data showed that growth was initiated in mid-April (day of year 135) and ended in mid-August (day of year 230) in 2009, with no systematic difference between treatments (defined as the day when 10% of the yearly growth increment was reached, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.4). Stem water deficit derived from dendrometer readings did not differ systematically between the two groups (Figure 3A). Soil moisture under CO2-enriched trees tended to be higher than under control trees, but this difference was already present before the onset of the treatment in the first year and disappeared in the second year (Figure 3B). Decreasing mean daily soil moisture generally increased mean daily stem water deficit sharply, but as judged by the AIC the pattern did not change between the two groups, neither before nor after the start of the CO2-treatment (Figure 4). Stem storage saturation occurred at a wide spectrum of soil moisture contents, but depleted stem water reservoirs only occurred at low soil moisture values (<25 Vol. %, Figure 4).
Figure 3. Stem water deficit in control and CO2-treated P. abies trees. (A) Standardized time series of stem water deficit in CO2-treated (bold) and control (dashed line) trees, growth-trend corrected (see section “Materials and Methods”). (B) Soil water content measured in the 10 cm top soil layer for the control and treated area. The insets show that there are no systematic differences between CO2-treated and control trees during any of the three periods.
Figure 4. Relationship between soil moisture (mean across ambient and CO2-treated area) and stem water deficit in per mille for P. abies under ambient (open symbols) and elevated CO2-conditions (filled symbols). Periods between day of year 175 and 250 were considered. AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; CPE, nonlinear model with common parameter estimates; VPE, nonlinear model with varying parameter estimates for each treatment. Soil moisture explained 77%, 82%, and 65% of the variation in stem water deficit during the pre-treatment period and the 2009 and 2010 CO2 enrichment periods, respectively. The gray-shaded area around the regression line indicates the 95% confidence interval.
We also looked at the relative sap flow response to VPD according to experimental period (before and after treatment initiation). The 95th percentiles per 2 kPa bin did not differ between treatments, both before and after CO2 enrichment, because the interaction between VPD and CO2 in the polynomial model fits was statistically not significant (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Relative sap flow plotted against the vapor pressure deficit (VPD), according to treatment (open symbols, ambient; closed symbols, treated), before and after the initialization of the CO2-treatment. Shown are 95 percentile values for 2 kPa bins, with non-linear fits (solid lines) and their 95% confidence intervals (gray-shaded area around the regression line). The merged model fits (treated and control trees) are shown. (A) 2009, before the start of the CO2 treatment. (B) 2010, during the CO2 treatment.
Comparison to Modeling the CO2-Response with LPJ-GUESS
Given the commonly implemented algorithms controlling leaf gas exchange in dynamic vegetation models, it can be expected that any PFT will show less water use under eCO2 (Farquhar et al., 1980). To see whether and to what extent this is the case in the commonly used DGVM LPJ-GUESS, we simulated our experiment with local climate data. We suppressed all other plant functional types but “needle-leaved evergreen.” The CO2 concentration for the 700-years spin-up was kept at 296 ppm. After 1901, the four CO2-scenarios outlined in the section “materials and methods” were imposed. The daily transpiration rates were sensitive to the final CO2 concentrations reached (550 ppm or 700 ppm), but only little to whether a step or gradual change in the CO2 concentration was used. Overall, there was c. 10% less transpiration in the 550 ppm scenario and c. 17% less transpiration in the 700 ppm scenario, regardless of how the concentration was reached or how long the new atmospheric conditions lasted (Table 1).
We aimed to assess the response of whole-tree water relations to future levels of atmospheric CO2 in Norway spruce, one of the most abundant and economically important coniferous tree species in Europe. Using five different, fully independent approaches (sap flow-, dendrometer-, leaf water potential-, and soil moisture measurements), our experimental data shows that this species is unlikely to adjust its water use under atmospheric CO2 concentrations anticipated to occur in c. 2050. This stands in contrast to the model results of the DGVM LPJ-GUESS, which predicts a c. 10% reduction in transpiration when simulating needle-leaved evergreen trees under CO2 concentrations and site conditions matching those of the field experiment. Because of the wide distribution across Europe and Asia and its importance as a timber species the lack of a water use response of Norway spruce to elevated atmospheric CO2 is fundamental for the parameterization and validation of DGVMs and fully coupled earth system models predicting the future water and carbon cycle. Further, it is central to our understanding of plant responses to eCO2 and how they are scaled with ontogeny and the successional stage of the tested species or community.
Critical to the estimates of net plant water use under eCO2 seem to be the developmental stage of the tested individuals, the species and PFT tested, the duration of the treatment, the method of CO2 administration, and the nature and timing of the measured traits used as a proxy to estimate plant water use (Table 2). All these factors will have an impact on the net response of plant water use to eCO2. Despite the large range of responses reported, the majority of studies tend to predict a decrease in stomatal conductance and therefore net water use under eCO2 (e.g., Curtis and Wang, 1998; Medlyn et al., 2001). However, there are numerous examples that show no response or even an increase in water use under eCO2. For P. abies, the species tested in the present study, Roberntz and Stockfors (1998) found no effect on gs using branch bags, and Barton et al. (1993), Kupper et al. (2006) and Uddling et al. (2009) all report an increase in water use under eCO2 from glasshouse and branch bag experiments. For Pinus taeda, both a branch-bag and an open-top chamber experiment suggest that this species does not respond to eCO2 in its water use (Teskey, 1995; Pataki et al., 1998). Contrary to grassland experiments, Domec et al. (2009) found reduced stomatal conductance under eCO2 in tall, 28 years old Pinus taeda individuals only at high soil moisture, and no response during dry conditions.
Table 2. Possible processes that contribute to the mitigation of the response of plant water use to eCO2.
In trees that are in an early (expanding) successional stage, increased LAI under eCO2 may periodically (over-) compensate reductions in stomatal conductance (Li et al., 2003) or lead to an increase in total water use (Bobich et al., 2010). Increasing LAI following CO2-treatment has been reported for a closed-canopy Pinus taeda stand growing at the Duke experimental forest (McCarthy et al., 2007). However, this canopy response to eCO2 was determined by nitrogen availability patterns and additional N fertilization trials suggested that LAI stimulation is unlikely to occur at high fertility sites (McCarthy et al., 2007). Most other eCO2 studies suggest that CO2 will not cause an increase in LAI in mature systems (Bader et al., in preparation; Körner et al., 2005; Norby et al., 2005; Warren et al., 2011). Hättenschwiler and Körner (1997) even found a lower LAI under eCO2 in a young, closed-canopy Norway spruce stand, similar to what tropical tree model ecosystems revealed after stand closure (Körner and Arnone, 1992). Furthermore, a LAI beyond c. 2.7 will not affect canopy conductance (Schulze et al., 1994). Given the age of our study trees (>100 years) and the nutrient-rich soil they thrive on, it seems improbable that CO2 enrichment will enhance LAI in this stand.
We argue that the majority of the evidence underlying the existing reviews on plant water savings under eCO2 experiments (Curtis and Wang, 1998; Medlyn et al., 2001; Ainsworth and Long, 2005; Ainsworth and Rogers, 2007) rests on short-term (sub-seasonal) experiments, predominantly on grasslands, tree seedlings or juveniles tested under relatively confined conditions (e.g., glasshouses). However, these test conditions tend to overestimate the effects of eCO2 on stomatal conductance and/or water use and potential long-term alterations such as structural changes in the hydraulic pathway as have been reported for Pinus taeda at the Duke FACE site may remain undetected (Table 2; Domec et al., 2009).
Another source for overestimating water use under eCO2 is temporal upscaling from an experimental period shorter than or non-representative of a whole year (Leuzinger and Körner, 2007, 2010). Often, the response strongly depends on the weather and soil moisture conditions (Wullschleger and Norby, 2001; Cech et al., 2003). Our study, together with others (Ellsworth, 1999; Schäfer et al., 2002; Bernacchi et al., 2003; Keel et al., 2007; Uddling et al., 2009), supports the view that near-natural conditions tend to yield a smaller or no response in annual water use to elevated CO2.
Apart from the obvious absence of a CO2-response in the water flux of our experimental trees, the patterns found (Figure 2) match with earlier reports on water relations of P. abies (e.g., Gross and Koch, 1991; Zweifel et al., 2001). The low pre-dawn shoot water potentials around −1 MPa resulted from a combination of soil water deficits and the hydrostatic water potential of c. 0.4 MPa. The diurnal courses of water relations also showed tight stomatal control over transpiration, preventing midday shoot water potentials from dropping below −1.9 MPa. This rather isohydric behavior allowed the maintenance of an adequate hydraulic safety margin from the critical threshold of −2.5 MPa that has been reported as turgor loss point (Gross and Koch, 1991) and as the level at which significant xylem cavitation occurs in branches of adult Norway spruce trees (Cochard, 1992; Lu et al., 1995). Compared to the first day of measurements (Figure 2, left panels), stomatal conductance decreased due to lower soil moisture or higher VPD, causing considerably less sap flow (Figure 2, middle and right panels). The incomplete night-time recovery of stem radius during times of low soil moisture (<30 vol. %) and high VPD suggests that internal water storage tissues could not be replenished and is thus indicative of a tree water deficit (Zweifel et al., 2005 Figure 3). We have no explanation for the high pre-dawn stomatal conductance measured in the morning of July 14 (Figure 2).
The modeled reduction in water use by coniferous trees for this site stands in contrast to our in situ measurements. The LPJ-GUESS dynamic vegetation model consistently predicted between 9% and 18% reduced transpiration, with the ambient CO2 concentration (Ca, 550 ppm vs. 700 ppm) causing most of the sensitivity of the response and the mode of increase (step vs. gradual) as well as the duration of the new conditions (immediately after the increase vs. 100 years later) being rather insignificant. In LPJ-GUESS, but also in other dynamic vegetation models, the first-order response originates from the photosynthesis model through stomatal closure due to increased intercellular CO2 concentrations (Ci). Because Ci/Ca is assumed constant, changes in Ca will result in proportional changes in stomatal conductance. However, in LPJ-GUESS this effect only manifests itself during ample water supply (see section “Materials and Methods”). Therefore, the CO2-response does not increase with dry conditions, which has been found earlier (Hickler et al., 2008), although a carry-over effect from wet to dry periods (higher available soil moisture under eCO2) is possible. This behavior certainly does not mirror observations from grassland (Niklaus et al., 1998; Morgan et al., 2004) and the drought × eCO2 interactions in trees do not seem to be uniform (Beerling et al., 1996; Heath, 1998; Cech et al., 2003; Leuzinger and Körner, 2007 and others).
The key difference between photosynthesis models that are employed in dynamic vegetation models is essentially the formulation of Ci/Ca (Katul et al., 2000). Therefore, the range of modeled responses is relatively narrow (Luo et al., 2008) and foreseeable, unless model-specific feedback mechanisms dampen or enhance the initial signal. For example, increased LAI through altered carbon allocation patterns, soil moisture, or atmospheric feedback (in a fully coupled model) could all contribute to changing the initial response largely prescribed by the photosynthesis model. The fact that our modeled water relations response to eCO2 seems largely-independent of the time the eCO2–conditions are in place suggests that very little feedback mechanisms contribute to altering the first-order response, which seems to be stable across models and ecosystem types (Luo et al., 2008). Another important component potentially responsible for mitigating the CO2-response are the leaf and canopy boundary layer resistances, which are in series with the stomatal resistance but not explicitly considered in LPJ-GUESS (McNaughton and Jarvis, 1991).
Clearly, there are limitations as to what conclusions can be drawn from a sample of five adult Norway spruce individuals treated with elevated atmospheric CO2 over two seasons only. Such experiments struggle with the inherent trade-off between sample size and the realism of the experimental setting. While it may be more satisfying to get statistically more robust results on CO2-responses with young trees, we make little progress if young trees respond differently to mature trees (Medlyn et al., 2001; Uddling et al., 2009; Leuzinger et al., 2011a,b). More data on water use under eCO2 are needed from large-scale studies in mature systems to confirm our results. Equally important is the continuation of large-scale experiments over many years in order to alleviate some of the statistical shortcomings from originating from low replication.
In conclusion, we find a contrasting response between our experimental results with mature P. abies trees, and the model output from the global dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS. Our experimental results are corroborated by evidence from studies on other plant functional types, and we argue that the more realistic the testing conditions, the smaller the water savings in response to eCO2. The modeled water relations response to eCO2 was strikingly robust both in this and previous studies. Because the modeled responses are closer to the leaf-level than to the ecosystem response in experiments, one explanation for the apparent discrepancy is that the propagation of the response from the leaf to the ecosystem is not captured appropriately in the currently available models. Attempts should be made to account for such processes in models potentially mitigating first-order CO2-effects on plant water use.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We are indebted to Christian Körner for his support and encouragement and his helpful comments on the manuscript. We also thank Roman Zweifel for advice on dedrometer installation and data analysis, E. Amstutz for crane operation and Georges Grun for FACE system supervision. The Swiss Canopy Crane free air CO2 enrichment study is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants 31-67775.02, 3100-059769.99, 3100-067775.02, and 3100AO-111914/1 to Ch. Körner. The crane was sponsored by the Swiss Federal Office of the Environment (FOEN). Financial support for Sebastian Leuzinger came from the FP7 project ACQWA and NCCR climate, Grant 3100-059769.99. Annett Wolf assisted with the model runs.
Ainsworth, E. A., and Long, S. P. (2005). What have we learnt from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. Tansley Rev. New Phytol. 165, 351–372.
Barton, C. V. M., Lee, H. S. J., and Jarvis, P. G. (1993). A branch bag and CO2 control-system for long-term CO2 enrichment of mature Sitka spruce Picea-sitchensis (Bong) carr. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 1139–1148.
Bernacchi, C. J., Calfapietra, C., Davey, P. A., Wittig, V. E., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. E., Raines, C. A., et al. (2003). Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance responses of poplars to free-air CO2 enrichment (PopFACE) during the first growth cycle and immediately following coppice. New Phytol. 159, 609–621.
Betts, R. A., Boucher, O., Collins, M., Cox, P. M., Falloon, P. D., Gedney, N., et al. (2007). Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide. Nature 448, 1037–1041.
Bobich, E. G., Barron-Gafford, G. A., Rascher, K. G., and Murthy, R. (2010). Effects of drought and changes in vapour pressure deficit on water relations of Populus deltoides growing in ambient and elevated CO(2). Tree Physiol. 30, 866–875.
Domec, J.-C., Palmroth, S., Ward, E., Maier, C. A., Therezien, M., and Oren, R. (2009). Acclimation of leaf hydraulic conductance and stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) to long-term growth in elevated CO(2) (free-air CO(2) enrichment) and N-fertilization. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 1500–1512.
Gross, K., and Koch, W. (1991). Water relations of picea-abies.1. Comparison of water relations parameters of spruce shoots examined at the end of the vegetation period and in winter. Physiol. Plantarum 83, 290–295.
Hartmann, H. (2011). Will a 385 million year-struggle for light become a struggle for water and for carbon? – How trees may cope with more frequent climate change-type drought events. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 642–655.
Hickler, T., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Mjofors, K., Miller, P., Arneth, A., et al. (2008). CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1531–1542.
Housman, D. C., Naumburg, E., Huxman, T. E., Charlet, T. N., Nowak, R. S., and Smith, S. D. (2006). Increases in desert shrub productivity under elevated carbon dioxide vary with water availability. Ecosystems 9, 374–385.
Körner, C., Asshoff, R., Bignucolo, O., Hattenschwiler, S., Keel, S. G., Pelaez-Riedl, S., et al. (2005). Carbon flux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO2. Science 309, 1360–1362.
Li, J. H., Dugas, W. A., Hymus, G. J., Johnson, D. P., Drake, B. G., and Hungate, B. A. (2003). Direct and indirect effects of elevated CO2 on transpiration from Quercus myrtifolia in a scrub-oak ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 96–105.
Lu, B., Biron, P., Bréda, N., and Granier, A. (1995). Water relations of adult Norway spruce (Picea abies (L) Karst) under soil drought in the Vosges mountains: water potential, stomatal conductance and transpiration. Ann. For. Sci. 52, 117–129.
Luo, Y. Q., Gerten, D., Le Maire, G., Parton, W. J., Weng, E. S., Zhou, X. H., et al. (2008). Modeled interactive effects of precipitation, temperature, and [CO2] on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1986–1999.
McCarthy, H. R., Oren, R., Finzi, A. C., Ellsworth, D. S., Kim, H.-S., Johnsen, K. H., et al. (2007). Temporal dynamics and spatial variability in the enhancement of canopy leaf area under elevated atmospheric CO2. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2479–2497.
McCarthy, H. R., Oren, R., Johnsen, K. H., Gallet-Budynek, A., Pritchard, S. G., Cook, C. W., et al. (2010). Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric CO2 with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytol. 185, 514–528.
Medhurst, J., Parsby, J., Linder, S., Wallin, G., Ceschia, E., and Slaney, M. (2006). A whole-tree chamber system for examining tree-level physiological responses of field-grown trees to environmental variation and climate change. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 1853–1869.
Medlyn, B. E., Barton, C. V. M., Broadmeadow, M. S. J., Ceulemans, R., De Angelis, P., Forstreuter, M., et al. (2001). Stomatal conductance of forest species after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytol. 149, 247–264.
Miller-Rushing, A. J., Primack, R. B., Templer, P. H., Rathbone, S., and Mukunda, S. (2009). Long-term relationships among atmospheric CO(2), stomata, and intrinsic water use efficiency in individual trees. Am. J. Bot. 96, 1779–1786.
Morgan, J. A., Pataki, D. E., Gruenzweig, J. M., Körner, C., Niklaus, P. A., Polley, H. W., et al. (2003). Grassland productivity responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide are driven primarily by water relations. Ecol. Soc. Am. Ann. Meet. Abstr. 88, 243.
Morgan, J. A., Pataki, D. E., Körner, C., Clark, H., Del Grosso, S. J., Grunzweig, J. M., et al. (2004). Water relations in grassland and desert ecosystems exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2. Oecologia 140, 11–25.
Norby, R. J., DeLucia, E. H., Gielen, B., Calfapietra, C., Giardina, C. P., King, J. S., et al. (2005). Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 18052–18056.
Norby, R. J., Warren, J. M., Iversen, C. M., Medlyn, B. E., and McMurtrie, R. E. (2010). CO(2) enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 19368–19373.
Norby, R. J., Wullschleger, S. D., Gunderson, C. A., Johnson, D. W., and Ceulemans, R. (1999). Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 683–714.
Roberntz, P., and Stockfors, J. (1998). Effects of elevated CO2 concentration and nutrition on net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and needle respiration of field-grown Norway spruce trees. Tree Physiol. 18, 233–241.
Schäfer, K. V. R., Oren, R., Lai, C. T., and Katul, G. G. (2002). Hydrologic balance in an intact temperate forest ecosystem under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Glob. Change Biol. 8, 895–911.
Schulze, E. D., Kelliher, F. M., Körner, C., Lloyd, J., and Leuning, R. (1994). Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition – a global ecology scaling exercise. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 629.
Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., et al. (2003). Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 161–185.
Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., and Sykes, M. T. (2001). Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 10, 621–637.
Tank, A. M. G. K., Wijngaard, J. B., Konnen, G. P., Bohm, R., Demaree, G., Gocheva, A., et al. (2002). Daily dataset of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment. Int. J. Climatol. 22, 1441–1453.
Tricker, P. J., Pecchiari, M., Bunn, S. M., Vaccari, F. P., Peressotti, A., Miglietta, F., et al. (2009). Water use of a bioenergy plantation increases in a future high CO(2) world. Biomass Bioenergy 33, 200–208.
Uddling, J., Teclaw, R. M., Kubiske, M. E., Pregitzer, K. S., and Ellsworth, D. S. (2008). Sap flux in pure aspen and mixed aspen-birch forests exposed to elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and ozone. Tree Physiol. 28, 1231–1243.
Uddling, J., Teclaw, R. M., Pregitzer, K. S., and Ellsworth, D. S. (2009). Leaf and canopy conductance in aspen and aspen-birch forests under free-air enrichment of carbon dioxide and ozone. Tree Physiol. 29, 1367–1380.
Warren, J. M., Poetzelsberger, E., Wullschleger, S. D., Thornton, P. E., Hasenauer, H., and Norby, R. J. (2011). Ecohydrologic impact of reduced stomatal conductance in forests exposed to elevated CO(2). Ecohydrology 4, 196–210.
Wullschleger, S. D., Gunderson, C. A., Hanson, P. J., Wilson, K. B., and Norby, R. J. (2002). Sensitivity of stomatal and canopy conductance to elevated CO2 concentrationinteracting variables and perspectives of scale. New Phytol. 153, 485–496.
Keywords: dendrometer, DGVM, FACE, leaf water potential, sap flow, stomatal conductance, vegetation modeling
Citation: Leuzinger S and Bader MK-F (2012) Experimental vs. modeled water use in mature Norway spruce (Picea abies) exposed to elevated CO2. Front. Plant Sci. 3:229. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00229
Received: 17 August 2012; Accepted: 25 September 2012;
Published online: 16 October 2012.
Edited by:Karina V. R. Schafer, Rutgers University Newark, USA
Reviewed by:Dirk Vanderklein, Montclair State University, USA
Michael J. O'Brien, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Copyright © 2012 Leuzinger and Bader. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
*Correspondence: Sebastian Leuzinger, School of Applied Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, 31-33 Symonds Street, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org