Original Research ARTICLE
Identification of novel transcription factors regulating secondary cell wall formation in Arabidopsis
- Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, UMR5546, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Toulouse III, UPS, Toulouse, France
The presence of lignin in secondary cell walls (SCW) is a major factor preventing hydrolytic enzymes from gaining access to cellulose, thereby limiting the saccharification potential of plant biomass. To understand how lignification is regulated is a prerequisite for selecting plant biomass better adapted to bioethanol production. Because transcriptional regulation is a major mechanism controlling the expression of genes involved in lignin biosynthesis, our aim was to identify novel transcription factors (TFs) dictating lignin profiles in the model plant Arabidopsis. To this end, we have developed a post-genomic approach by combining four independent in-house SCW-related transcriptome datasets obtained from (1) the fiber cell wall-deficient wat1 Arabidopsis mutant, (2) Arabidopsis lines over-expressing either the master regulatory activator EgMYB2 or (3) the repressor EgMYB1 and finally (4) Arabidopsis orthologs of Eucalyptus xylem-expressed genes. This allowed us to identify 502 up- or down-regulated TFs. We preferentially selected those present in more than one dataset and further analyzed their in silico expression patterns as an additional selection criteria. This selection process led to 80 candidates. Notably, 16 of them were already proven to regulate SCW formation, thereby validating the overall strategy. Then, we phenotyped 43 corresponding mutant lines focusing on histological observations of xylem and interfascicular fibers. This phenotypic screen revealed six mutant lines exhibiting altered lignification patterns. Two of them [Bel-like HomeoBox6 (blh6) and a zinc finger TF] presented hypolignified SCW. Three others (myb52, myb-like TF, hb5) showed hyperlignified SCW whereas the last one (hb15) showed ectopic lignification. In addition, our meta-analyses highlighted a reservoir of new potential regulators adding to the gene network regulating SCW but also opening new avenues to ultimately improve SCW composition for biofuel production.
Plant cells are enclosed in cell walls, which provide them with structural support and regulate growth and differentiation. There are two main types of cell walls: primary cell walls and secondary cell walls (SCWs). Primary cell walls are formed in all plant cells and are composed mainly of cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin. SCWs are much thicker and are deposited in the inner side of primary cell walls only in some highly specialized tissues and cell types such as xylem vessels and fiber cells. Lignified SCW are the most abundant source of renewable biomass on earth, and are widely used for construction, paper, and energy. In the context of the energetic crisis, lignocellulosic biomass has received growing attention as raw material for the production of second-generation biofuels.
SCWs are composed of cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. The impregnation with lignin renders SCWs waterproof and resistant, allowing water conduction through xylem vessels as well as mechanical support. On the other hand, for lignocellulosic biofuel production, lignin is a major negative factor preventing hydrolytic enzymes from gaining access to cellulose and, as a result limits the saccharification potential. The biosynthetic pathways leading to SCWs formation are highly regulated at the transcriptional level. Tremendous progress has been made during the last decade supporting the existence of a complex hierarchical regulatory network of transcription factors (TFs). Most of those belong to two large TF families: R2R3-MYB and NAC (NAM/ATAF/CUC) (Demura and Fukuda, 2007; Zhong and Ye, 2007; Grima-Pettenati et al., 2012; Wang and Dixon, 2012; Zhong et al., 2012). Some members of the NAC TF family are key regulators of SCW formation in fibers and/or in vessels. This particular SCW related subgroup of NACs include the NAC SECONDARY WALL THICKENING PROMOTING FACTOR 1 (NST1), SECONDARY WALL-ASSOCIATED NAC DOMAIN PROTEIN1 (SND1/NST3), NST2, and the VASCULAR-RELATED NAC DOMAIN (VND6 and VDN7) (Kubo et al., 2005; Mitsuda et al., 2005, 2007; Zhong et al., 2006, 2012; Ko et al., 2007). Over expression of any of these NACs led to ectopic lignification in cells that normally contain only primary cell walls (for review, see Grima-Pettenati et al., 2012). A double mutation of SND1 and NST1 resulted in loss of SCW in fibers, whereas the simultaneous repression of VND6 and VND7 led to a defect in vessel SCW thickenings (Kubo et al., 2005; Zhong et al., 2007b). In the regulatory hierarchical network SDN1, NST1/2, and VND6/7 are first-level master switches controlling downstream TF regulators (Zhong and Ye, 2007; Wang and Dixon, 2012; Zhong et al., 2012). The second layer of regulators includes many MYB TFs (MYB20, MYB42, MYB43, MYB46, MYB52, MYB54, MYB58, MYB69, MYB61, MYB63, MYB83, MYB85, and MYB103) (Zhong et al., 2008; Ko et al., 2009; McCarthy et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2009; Romano et al., 2012) as well as several other TFs like SND2, SND3, KNAT7, AtC3H14 Zinc finger TF (Zhong et al., 2008; Ko et al., 2009). Some of these are also master regulators since they control the biosynthesis of the three main components of SCW i.e., cellulose, xylan, and lignin. The discovery of this multi-leveled hierarchical regulatory network has been a breakthrough in our understanding of the regulation of the lignified SCW, although it is far from being complete. For instance, only a few TFs characterized hitherto are regulating specifically one of the SCW components, although three MYBs (MYB85, MYB58, and MYB63) were reported to be lignin-specific. In addition, our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms determining the heterogeneous SCW deposition in different cell types, as well as those governing the various patterns of SCW deposition is still very poor. More efforts are needed to get a comprehensive picture of the transcriptional regulation of the SCWs both from a fundamental and an applied perspective.
As a step toward this goal, we searched for novel TFs potentially implicated in the control of lignin deposition. To do this, we set up a post-genomic approach combining four original in-house SCW-related transcriptomic data sets that enabled us to identify 80 candidates belonging to major plant TFs families (i.e., NAC, MYB, bHLH, Zinc finger, HomeoBox, and AP2/ERF). Most of them have not yet been functionally characterized. Histochemical analyses of the corresponding mutants revealed six strong candidates regulating the biosynthesis of lignin and/or the whole SCW biosynthetic program: BLH6 (Bel-like HomeoBox6; AT4G34610), HB5 (AT5G65310), HB15 (AT1G52150), MYB-like TF (AT3G11280), MYB52 (AT1G17950), and Zinc finger TF (AT3G46620).
A Post-Genomic Approach to Identify Novel Regulatory Genes Involved in SCW Formation
In order to identify novel regulatory genes involved in SCW formation, we took advantage of four large scale in house transcriptomic data sets and developed a post-genomic approach. A flow chart of the main steps of this original strategy is described in Figure 1. The first SCW-related in house transcriptome dataset came from the Arabidopsis mutant, wat1 (walls are thin 1), which has little to no SCW in fibers (Ranocha et al., 2010). In this mutant, the transcript levels of many genes associated with the regulation and/or the biosynthesis of the different SCW wall polymers were dramatically reduced in keeping with the mutant phenotype. Within the genes up/or down-regulated in the mutant background, we identified 97 TFs including some well-known SCW-regulating TFs such as SND1, SNT1, and MYB46 (Table S1). The second transcriptome dataset was comprised of 240 TFs (Table S2) that exhibited de-regulated expression in Arabidopsis lines over-expressed the SCW-master activator EgMYB2, which is a Eucalyptus R2R3 MYB TF highly expressing in xylem cells undergoing SCW thickening (Goicoechea et al., 2005). EgMYB2 is able to activate the promoters of lignin (Goicoechea et al., 2005), cellulose, and xylan biosynthetic genes (Zhong and Ye, 2009), leading to thicker SCW in EgMYB2 over-expressing lines in tobacco (Goicoechea et al., 2005; De Micco et al., 2012). Moreover, the closest orthologs of EgMYB2 in Arabidopsis AtMYB46 and AtMYB83 encode for master regulators capable of activating the whole SCW biosynthetic program (Zhong et al., 2007a; McCarthy et al., 2009), and EgMYB2 was able to complement the myb46-myb83 double mutant (Zhong et al., 2010). The third transcriptome dataset included 309 TFs (Table S3) deregulated in Arabidopsis lines over-expressing the SCW-repressor, EgMYB1 (Legay et al., 2010). EgMYB1 over-expressors exhibited fewer lignified fibers particularly in the interfascicular zones and reduced SCW thickenings. Klason lignin content was moderately but significantly reduced and decreased transcript accumulation was observed for genes involved in the biosynthesis of lignins, cellulose, and xylan (Legay et al., 2010). Finally, the fourth dataset was composed of 87 TFs (Table S4) that were the Arabidopsis orthologs of Eucalyptus TFs preferentially expressed in differentiating xylem (Rengel et al., 2009), a tissue that is particularly rich in cells undergoing SCW deposition and lignification. Altogether, these four transcriptomic datasets allowed us to identify a total of 502 candidate TFs. To narrow down the number of candidates for functional validation, we selected 186 that were identified in two datasets (Table S5). It should be noted that 43 of those were found in three data sets and only three were common to the four datasets bHLH5 (AT5G46760), IAA9 (AT5G65670), and AP2 TF RAP2.2 (AT3G14230).
Figure 1. Overall strategy to identify transcription factors (TFs) involved in SCW formation. Four in-house SCW formation-related transcriptomic datasets were crossed to select TFs present in more than one dataset/experimental condition. These TFs were further screened against publicly available large-scale transcriptomic datasets, to select those highly or preferentially expressed in the organs and/or tissues of interest. This led to a list of 80 candidate genes, of which we phenotyped the 42 T-DNA insertion mutants and/or RNAi transgenic plants available. The four in house SCW related transcriptomic datasets include (1) the fiber SCW-deficient wat1 Arabidopsis mutant, (2) Arabidopsis lines over-expressing the SCW master activator EgMYB2, (3) Arabidopsis lines over-expressing the SCW master repressor EgMYB1, and (4) Arabidopsis orthologs of Eucalyptus xylogenesis-related genes.
Cross-Comparison with Publicly Available Microarray Data
To further narrow down the selection of the 186 candidate TFs for further functional analysis, we examined their in silico expression patterns using Genevestigator (Hruz et al., 2008). We restricted our list to genes that were preferentially and/or highly expressed in situations in which SCW formation is prevalent i.e., in xylem, the basal part of the inflorescence stem, and/or in cell suspension cultures undergoing in vitro SCW formation (Kubo et al., 2005). This in silico expression screen allowed us to obtain a final list of 80 candidate SCW TFs (Table 1).
The most represented families in decreasing order were the MYB TF family (containing 19 members), the AP2 ERF (Ethylene Response Factor) TF family (12), the HB (HomeoBox protein) TF family (9), and the Aux/IAA family (7) (Figure 2). The other TFs belonged to the WRKY (5), NAC (5), bHLH (5), Zinc finger TF (5), bZip (3), and ARF (2) families, respectively.
Figure 2. Distribution of the 80 SCW candidate TFs according to family. Amongst them, four families have been shown previously to regulate SCW formation: MYB, NAC, HB (Homeodomain containing TF), and WRKY; three TF families are involved in hormone signaling including ARF, Aux/IAA, and AP2 ERF TF families. “Others” include the following TF families: LIM, CCAAT binding, HMG (High Mobility Group, belonging to a transcription complex), AINTEGUMENTA (ANT; AP2 like TF), Scarecrow-like TF1 (SCL1), and Squamosa-like1 (SPL1).
It is noteworthy that 16 of the 80 candidates were already shown to regulate SCW formation. They include eight MYB TF (MYB20, MYB42, MYB46, MYB52, MYB61, MYB63, MYB75, MYB85, and MYB103) (Zhong et al., 2007a, 2008; Ko et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2009; Ohman et al., 2013), four NAC TF (SND1, NST1 XND1, and VNI2) (Mitsuda et al., 2005; Zhong et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2008; Yamaguchi et al., 2010), three Homeodomain containing TF (HB14, HB15, and KNAT7) (McConnell et al., 2001; Emery et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2005; Zhong et al., 2008) and one WRKY TF (WRKY12) (Wang et al., 2010) (complete list in Table 1). This significant proportion of characterized SCW related TF in our final list validates well the strategy used in this study. For example, MYB46 (Zhong et al., 2007a), MYB85 (Zhong et al., 2008), and WRKY12 (Wang et al., 2010) were present in three of the four transcriptomic datasets.
Phenotypes of TF T-DNA Mutant or RNAi Transgenic Lines
We then collected and characterized publicly available T-DNA mutant lines or RNAi transgenic lines that corresponded to 43 of the 80 candidate genes (Table S6). The information concerning the different lines including T-DNA insertion position and in-house databases source is presented in Table S6. Phenotyping was performed on 20 cm-high mutant stems grown in short-day growth conditions. Under these conditions, the basal part of the stem abundantly develops cells undergoing SCW thickening (xylem vessel cells, xylary fiber cells, and interfascicular fiber cells). Histological analyses of SCW were performed using the natural auto fluorescence of phenolic compounds under UV-light as well as phloroglucinol-HCl staining, which is indicative of the lignin content. We found significant alteration of lignin profiles in six mutant lines corresponding to two MYB TFs: MYB like TF (AT3G11280) and MYB52 (AT1G17950), three HomeoBox TF HB5 (AT5G65310), BLH6 (AT4G34610), and HB15 (AT1G52150) and a Zinc finger TF (AT3G46620), although the overall organization of vascular bundles and interfascicular fibers was not altered in these six mutant lines (Figures 3, 4).
Figure 3. Stem cross sections of five T-DNA mutant lines presenting either hypo or hyperlignified SCWs. Sections of wild-type plant and T-DNA mutants were observed under UV light (A–F) or stained with phloroglucinol-HCl (G–L). Phloem cap cells and ectopic lignification in epidermal cells are indicated by blue and pink arrows, respectively. Observations were made at the basal part of inflorescence stems at the stage of newly formed green siliques, about two weeks after bolting, when the inflorescence stems reached 20 cm height. if, interfascicular fiber; xf, xylary fiber; mx, metaxylem; px, protoxylem; sx, secondary xylem; ep, epidermis. Scale bar: 20 μm.
Figure 4. Stem sections of the hb15 T-DNA mutant. Auto-fluorescence observed under UV light of wild type (A) and hb15 mutant (B) Phloroglucinol-HCl staining of lignin in wild type (C) and hb15 mutant (D). Ectopic lignification in large parenchyma cells and in small parenchyma cells surrounding protoxylem is indicated by red arrows and yellow arrows, respectively; precocious secondary walled secondary xylem formation is indicated by green arrow. if, interfascicular fiber; xf, xylary fiber; mx, metaxylem; px, protoxylem; sx, secondary xylem; ep, epidermis. Scale bar: 20 μm.
Under UV-light the intensity of auto-fluorescence was lower in zinc finger TF (Figure 3B) and in blh6 (Figure 3C) mutant lines in both vascular bundles and interfascicular regions as compared to the control (Figure 3A), suggesting a global decrease in phenolic compound deposition. The SCW in xylem vessels, xylary fibers, and interfascicular fibers were observed in more detail using phloroglucinol-HCl staining. Little to no SCW was deposited in xylary fibers (Figures 3H,I) and moreover, SCW thickness was largely reduced in interfascicular fibers (thin and weak phloroglucinol staining) as compared to wild-type (Figure 3G) suggesting that these lines were hypolignified.
Auto-fluorescence under UV light was more intense in myb like TF (Figure 3D), hb5 (Figure 3E), and myb52 (Figure 3F) lines than in controls (Figure 3A), especially in the interfascicular region, suggesting an increased deposition of phenolic compounds and possibly lignins. This was further confirmed by a massive and intense phloroglucinol staining indicating an enhanced lignin deposition in the interfascicular fiber and xylary fiber cells of these mutants (Figures 3J–L). Extra-layers of cells with lignified SCW were detected in the external layers of both interfascicular fibers and metaxylem vessels in two lines myb-like TF (Figure 3J, green arrows) and myb52 (Figure 3L, green arrows) as compared to the control (Figure 3A). This observation suggests that secondary xylem formation was enhanced and appeared earlier than in wild-type. A strong fluorescent signal was also detected in the phloem cap cells (Figures 3D–F, blue arrows) in all three highly auto-fluorescent lines suggesting a transition of phloem cap cells to phloem sclereids (highly lignified) which was further confirmed by phloroglucinol staining (Figures 3J–L, blue arrows). Similarly, auto-fluorescent signals (Figure 3F) and strong phloroglucinol-HCl staining (Figure 3L, pink arrow) were detected in the epidermal cells of some myb52 T-DNA insertion lines revealing an ectopic deposition of lignin.
Both auto-fluorescence and phloroglucinol staining of stem sections of hb15 (Figures 4B,D) showed that large parenchyma cells adjacent to the inner side of the interfascicular fibers (red arrow), as well as smaller xylem parenchyma cells surrounding the protoxylem (yellow arrow) exhibited lignified SCW. The corresponding cells in the control have non-lignified primary walls (Figures 4A,C). As compared to the control, extra layers of cells with lignified SCW were present in the most external rows of the interfascicular fibers and xylem (Figures 4B,D, green arrows) suggesting an enhanced and early formation of secondary xylem. Moreover, both xylary and interfascicular fibers in hb15 lines exhibited both a more intense auto-fluorescence and staining by phloroglucinol than that of the control suggesting higher lignin content.
The overall growth behavior of the mutants did not differ significantly from the controls, except the bolting and flowering time were altered in three of the mutant lines. Hypolignified blh6 and zinc finger lines bolted and flowered earlier than controls (Figures 5A,C) whereas the hyperlignified hb15 line exhibited delayed bolting and flowering (Figures 5B,C). In addition, hb15 mutants exhibited aerial rosettes at the base of the lateral inflorescence branches instead of growing cauline leaves as in wild-type plants (Figure 5D).
Figure 5. Comparison of flowering time between wild-type and mutants plants. (A) Early flowering hypo-lignified line blh6. (B) Delayed flowering of hyperlignified line bh5. (C) Flowering time comparison between wild type and hypo or hyperlignified mutants. Significant and very significant statistical differences to wild type are represented by * or **, respectively (Student t-test). (D) Aerial rosette formation on the inflorescence of hb5 mutants. Scale bar: 5 cm. DAG, days after germination. Arrows point to aerial rosettes.
Co-Expression Analysis of Candidate TFs Genes
Since it is known that transcriptionally coordinated genes tend to be functionally related (Ruprecht and Persson, 2012), we performed co-expression analyses for the six candidate genes in order to further validate their role in controlling SCW synthesis and get some clues about their function. The co-expression genes lists were generated using the Genevestigator platform (https://www.genevestigator.com), Arabidopsis co-expression data mining tools and GeneCAT. All six candidate TFs were co-expressed with genes related to cell wall formation (Tables 2, 3 and Tables S7–S10) albeit to different extents ranging from 10 to 66% of SCW associated genes amongst the 50 first co-expressed genes. The most remarkably high co-expression profiles were found for MYB52 and BLH6.
Among the top 50 genes co-expressed with BLH6, 30 (60%) were related to SCW formation (Table 2). Notably, they included genes involved in the biosynthesis of the three main cell wall polymers i.e., three main SCW cellulose synthases genes (CESAs) (IRX5/CESA4, IRX3/CESA7, and IRX1/CESA8), three genes implicated in xylan biosynthesis [IRX10/GUT2, GUX1 (Glucuronic acid substitution of xylan1), and XTH32 (xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase 32) (Brown et al., 2009; MacMillan et al., 2010)] as well as two laccase genes (IRX12/LAC4 and LAC17) involved in monolignol polymerization (Berthet et al., 2011). Moreover, several SCW master transcriptional regulators were also co-expressed with BLH6, such as MYB46, MYB83, and SND2 (Zhong et al., 2008; Zhong and Ye, 2012).
The co-expression analysis of MYB52 revealed that 33 of the top 50 genes (66%) co-expressed with MYB52 were related to SCW formation. The list of co-expressed genes included genes encoding key biosynthetic enzymes of the main SCW polymers i.e., cellulose (IRX3/CESA7, IRX1/CES8, IRX6/COBL4, and CTL2), hemicelluloses (IRX10/GUT1, IRX8, IRX9, IRX15, and IRX15-L), and possibly lignins (LAC2 and LAC10). MYB52 was also co-expressed with many SCW regulators such as MYB54, MYB85, MYB69, MYB103, SND2/NAC073, and XND1/NAC104 (Xylem NAC Domain1).
Functional genomics approaches developed during the last decade have generated numerous candidate genes related to SCW formation in Arabidopsis and other plant species. Whereas these large individual gene lists make difficult the choice of the most promising candidates for the further functional validation, meta-analyses combining multiple transcriptomic data sets offer a new way to reveal some core regulators.
By cross-comparing four SCW-related transcriptomic datasets, we selected 186 TFs present in at least two experimental conditions. Since these datasets came from very different backgrounds (mutants and over-expressors of SCW regulatory genes as well as orthologs of Eucalyptus xylem expressed genes), the selection of genes appearing in more than one dataset likely helped us to identify “core regulators” of SCW formation but might also have filtered out some more specific regulators. We further restricted the candidate gene list by including in silico analyses of their expression making the hypothesis that TFs expressed highly or preferentially in xylem tissues and/or during tracheary elements formation would be the most promising candidates. Indeed this strategy was successful since among the 80 genes that came out, 16 have already been reported to be regulators of the SCW. They included, for instance, the master regulators SND1 and MYB46 as well as the lignin-specific MYB85.
Forty-three mutant lines were phenotyped but only six exhibited a notable cell wall phenotype. This high proportion of mutants without phenotype is not surprising since many mutants targeting only one TF are known to yield mild to no phenotype (Okushima et al., 2005; Overvoorde et al., 2005; Jensen et al., 2011; Ruprecht et al., 2011). This is particularly true for multigene families TFs where functional redundancy prevents the observation of distinct phenotypes in knock-out mutants. This is indeed the case for a large proportion of the SCW regulators characterized hitherto including some of the sixteen highlighted here. For instance, whereas a single mutant of the SCW master transcriptional activator MYB46 did not exhibit any cell wall phenotype, the double knock out mutant myb46/myb83 with its closest ortholog MYB83 showed a severe reduction of SCW thickness (Zhong et al., 2007a; McCarthy et al., 2009). Therefore, genes for which the corresponding single mutants exhibited no phenotype in this study may still be interesting candidates taking part in the regulation of SCW formation. Further experiments using over-expressors and/or mutants of two or more paralog genes would increase the probability of obtaining informative phenotypes and insight into their functions. Our in silico analyses pointed out some very promising genes which should be further characterized using such approaches.
The most abundantly represented TF family in our list was the MYB family (19 members) of which eight (belonging to the R2R3 subfamily) have already been shown to regulate either the phenylpropanoid pathway and/or the SCW formation. It is the case for MYB46 (Zhong et al., 2007a), MYB63 (Zhou et al., 2009), MYB85 (Zhong et al., 2008), and MYB103 (Ohman et al., 2013). We phenotyped myb52 insertion lines that exhibited a strong hyperlignification phenotype, thus suggesting that MYB52 could be a repressor of the lignin biosynthesis and possibly of the whole SCW formation. This result is in apparent contradiction with a previous study showing that the dominant repression of MYB52 caused a severe reduction in SCW thickening in both interfascicular fibers and xylary fibers of the inflorescence stem (Zhong et al., 2008). The authors concluded that MYB52 was an activator of the SCW although no phenotype was detectable when over-expressed. A likely explanation to these apparent discrepancies is that MYB52 encodes a transcriptional repressor as clearly suggested by our knock-out mutant phenotype and therefore its dominant repression would result in a stronger transcriptional repression. MYB52 appeared to be tightly co-expressed with MYB54 and WAT1. It is also co-expressed with several cellulose and xylan biosynthetic genes and with MYB85, a specific regulator of the lignin biosynthesis (Zhong et al., 2008). Altogether, these results suggest for MYB52 a repressor role of the whole SCW program although this needs to be supported by further experiments.
Besides these canonic R2R3 MYBs, four MYB-like proteins were present in the candidate list and one mutant was analyzed. Although none of these MYB-like factors has been yet reported as regulators of the SCW, the myb-like TF T-DNA mutant had a clear hyperlignification phenotype suggesting a repressor role of the lignin biosynthesis and/or SCW. The myb-like TF gene was annotated in TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org) as a putative MYB domain containing TF able to interact with the gene product of vacuolar ATPase subunit B1 (VHA-B1). Interestingly, it is highly co-expressed with a newly reported gene XIP1 (XYLEM INTERMIXED WITH PHLOEM1), a leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (Table S8). The XIP1 knock-down mutants shows the accumulation of cells with ectopic lignification in regions of phloem in the vascular bundles of inflorescence stems (Bryan et al., 2012).
The homeodomain containing TFs were well represented in the list of candidate genes with nine members. Members of this family have been shown to regulate procambium cell activities by promoting secondary walled xylem cell differentiation during vascular development. Some HD-ZIP III TF (HB8, PHV/HB9, PHB/HB14, REV/IFL1, and CAN/HB15) and KANADI TF (KAN1-KAN3) were shown to be involved in the secondary walled cell type formation and patterning in roots and stems (Baima et al., 2001; Emery et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2005; Ilegems et al., 2010). Three of the homeodomain TF mutants analyzed in our study exhibited SCW phenotypes. The blh6 mutant had less lignified SCW mainly in the xylary and interfascicular fibers, whereas in the hb5 mutant the fibers in both fascicular and interfascicular regions were heavily lignified. In the hb15 mutant, both regions were also highly lignified but in addition ectopic lignification was observed in the parenchymatous cells adjacent to fiber and xylem cells (Figures 4B,D). This suggests that HB15 represses the SCW formation program rather than only promote the xylem cell differentiation as was concluded from earlier studies where down-regulation of CAN/HB15 stimulated xylem production, and over-expression of a miR166-resistant HB15 (gain-of-function mutant) resulted in reduced xylem formation (Kim et al., 2005). Co-expression analyses revealed interesting clues for BLH6 which was co-expressed with genes involved in the biosynthesis of the three main polymers i.e., cellulose, xylan, and lignin as well as with the master regulator MYB46 and its closest paralog MYB83. Together with the hypolignified phenotype of the mutant and the thinner SCW particularly in the fibers, this further supports a role of BLH6 as an activator of the whole SCW program.
AP2 ERF TF (AT3G14230) was identified in all four SCW-related transcriptomic datasets and exhibited high and preferential expression in xylem, but the corresponding mutant had no detectable cell wall phenotype. Twelve members of the AP2 ERF TF family were highlighted by our in silico approach, seven of which had high and preferential expression in xylem and another (AT5G61590) was strongly induced during in vitro tracheary element formation. Although this family was the second most highly represented TF family just after the MYBs in the 80 candidate list, none of its members have yet been shown to be directly involved in the regulation of SCW formation. This family therefore deserves more attention especially because it was recently reported that ethylene regulates cambium activity and promotes secondary walled xylem formation (Love et al., 2009).
Some members of the auxin-dependent TFs Aux/IAA and ARF families have been shown to be involved in vascular tissue formation. For example, loss-of-function in ARF5/MP (Hardtke and Berleth, 1998) and gain-of-function in IAA12/BDL (Hamann et al., 2002) resulted in reduced and discontinuous vascular formation. These TF families were also highly represented within the 80 candidates with seven and two members for Aux/IAA and ARF, respectively. IAA9 was a very promising candidate found in the four transcriptomic datasets, highly and preferentially expressed in xylem and during tracheary elements differentiation. Unfortunately the corresponding mutant was unavailable at the time this work was performed. T-DNA insertion mutants corresponding to ARF4, ARF6 and IAA28, and an IAA11 RNAi transgenic line were analyzed here but did not show any obvious SCW phenotype. This is very likely due to their functional redundancy as reported in previous studies (Okushima et al., 2005; Overvoorde et al., 2005). The creation of double/triple mutants of these paralog genes might be necessary to further assess their involvement in SCW formation.
The hypolignified lines blh6 and zinc finger TF displayed earlier flowering time as compared to control whereas the hyperlignification line hb5 exhibited delayed flowering time. Two previous studies demonstrated that flowering induction time was determinant for xylem expansion and SCW formation in Arabidopsis hypocotyls and roots. Some major QTLs for SCW thickening during xylem expansion and fiber differentiation correlated tightly with a major flowering time QTL. In addition, transient induction of flowering at the rosette stage promoted SCW thickening and xylem expansion (Sibout et al., 2008). Double mutant of two flowering time genes soc1 ful showed a synergistically delayed flowering time and a dramatically increased SCW formation with wood development present throughout all stems and to a much larger extent than any Arabidopsis mutant described to date (Melzer et al., 2008). Collectively these results suggest that the flowering induction is coupled with the SCW thickening program and xylem formation.
In conclusion, we described here a post-genomic approach that enabled us to propose a list of 80 promising candidate genes potentially regulating SCW formation and/or lignification. Many of the available mutants analyzed did not provide any detectable SCW phenotype and complementary approaches (overexpression, using different alleles, dominant repression, or multiple mutants) are now necessary to further characterize their function. However, the six TFs of which mutants exhibited clear lignin phenotypes, further highlight the complexity of the regulatory network controlling SCW formation. Their in depth functional characterization should allow a better understanding of the regulation of lignification and SCW formation which may ultimately be used to improve the saccharification potential.
Materials and Methods
Cross-Comparison of Microarray Datasets
Four in house microarray datasets were generated in our laboratory. In brief, datasets are from wat1 T-DNA Arabidopsis mutant CATMA microarray (Ranocha et al., 2010); EgMYB1 (Legay et al., 2010), EgMYB2 over-expressed in Arabidopsis (unpublished), and orthologs of Eucalyptus xylem expressed genes (Rengel et al., 2009). Publicly available microarray datasets were extracted from Genevestigator (https://www.genevestigator.com) (Hruz et al., 2008) by using Arabidopsis ATH1 22k array platform (7392 array datasets).
Plant Material and Growth Condition
The mutant lines were isolated from the T-DNA mutagenized populations in the SALK collection (Alonso et al., 2003) and from the RNAi transgenic plant populations in the Agrikola collection (http://www.agrikola.org). Seeds were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center (NASC) (http://arabidopsis.info/) and GABI (http://www.gabi-kat.de/). Homozygote lines were obtained from NASC or generated in lab and verified by PCR genotyping with gene specific primers and the respective left border primers of the T-DNA listed in supplementary Table S11. The transcript levels of each target gene in the six T-DNA insertion mutant were assessed (Figure S1) and the corresponding primers are listed in supplementary Table S12. Plants were grown in jiffy peat pellets then transferred to standard soil in culture room in short day conditions [9 h light, 200 μmol photons m−1s−1, 22°C (day)/20°C (night), 70% RH]. The flowering time was considered from sowing day until the flower stem reached 20 cm in height.
The histological comparative analysis of SCW between wild type and mutants was done at the stage of newly formed green siliques, about 2 weeks after bolting, when the inflorescence stems reach 20 cm in height. At this stage, the basal part of the inflorescence stem abundantly develops cells undergoing secondary wall thickening (xylem vessel cells, fascicular, and interfascicular fiber cells). Lignin polymers are the characteristic components of SCW and are normally absent from primary cell wall, therefore we used lignin deposition detection techniques to screen for SCW phenotype. Two methods were then chosen to detect the lignin polymers in the sections for microscopic observation. Firstly we used the natural auto fluorescence of the aromatic ring moieties on the subunits of the lignin polymer under UV-light exposition. Secondly, we used the phloroglucinol-HCl coloration which stains specifically lignin polymer precursors coniferaldehyde and p-coumaraldehyde in the SCW giving a red-purple color when observed under normal light. Cross sections of inflorescence stems at the basal end (100–150 μm) were either observed using auto-fluorescence or stained with phloroglucinol-HCl. Auto-fluorescence was observed with a Leica microscope (excitation filter Bp 340–380 nm; suppression filter Lp 430 nm; http://leica.com). Phloroglucinol-HCl was directly applied on the slide. Images were recorded with a CCD camera (Photonic Science, http://www.photonic-science.co.uk).
Three co-expression analysis tools were explored using Genevestigator (https://www.genevestigator.com), Arabidopsis co-expression data mining tools (http://www.arabidopsis.leeds.ac.uk/act/), and GeneCAT (http://genecat.mpg.de/). The results were presented using Genevestigator output tables and genes classified according to gene ontology semantic (Berardini et al., 2004). We used Genevestigator Arabidopsis ATH1 22k array platform with in absentia parameters that comprise all 7392 qualified datasets and is regardless of the underlying microarray datasets and the bait genes (i.e., all samples, condition-independent, and no-tissues specific bait genes), 50 was as “cut-off” threshold for co-expressed genes list.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
This work was supported by grants from the European FP7 project RENEWALL (FP7-211982), the Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and the Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier (UPS). This work was part of the Laboratoire d'Excellence (LABEX) project entitled TULIP (ANR-10-LABX-41). The authors are grateful to Prof S. Hawkins (Université de Lille, France) for kindly communicating unpublished data on Arabidopsis lines over-expressing EgMYB2. We also acknowledge Dr. P. Ranocha (LRSV) for his precious advice and help since the beginning of this work, Y. Martinez (FR3450) for assistance with microscopy analysis. Thanks also to PhD student H. Yu for her help in quantifying the transcript levels of HB15 and ZINC FINGER TF in their corresponding T-DNA insertional mutants and the internship training students C. Lin and R. Kardinskaite for their help with plant growth, genotyping, and phenotyping.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/Plant_Biotechnology/10.3389/fpls.2013.00189/abstract
Alonso, J. M., Stepanova, A. N., Leisse, T. J., Kim, C. J., Chen, H., Shinn, P., et al. (2003). Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301, 653–657. doi: 10.1126/science.1086391
Baima, S., Possenti, M., Matteucci, A., Wisman, E., Altamura, M. M., Ruberti, I., et al. (2001). The Arabidopsis ATHB-8 HD-zip protein acts as a differentiation-promoting transcription factor of the vascular meristems. Plant Physiol. 126, 643–655. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.2.643
Berardini, T. Z., Mundodi, S., Reiser, L., Huala, E., Garcia-Hernandez, M., Zhang, P., et al. (2004). Functional annotation of the Arabidopsis genome using controlled vocabularies. Plant Physiol. 135, 1–11. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.040071
Berthet, S., Demont-Caulet, N., Pollet, B., Bidzinski, P., Cezard, L., Le Bris, P., et al. (2011). Disruption of LACCASE4 and 17 results in tissue-specific alterations to lignification of Arabidopsis thaliana stems. Plant Cell 23, 1124–1137. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.082792
Brown, D. M., Zhang, Z., Stephens, E., Dupree, P., and Turner, S. R. (2009). Characterization of IRX10 and IRX10-like reveals an essential role in glucuronoxylan biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 57, 732–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03729.x
Bryan, A. C., Obaidi, A., Wierzba, M., and Tax, F. E. (2012). XYLEM INTERMIXED WITH PHLOEM1, a leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase required for stem growth and vascular development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 235, 111–122. doi: 10.1007/s00425-011-1489-6
De Micco, V., Ruel, K., Joseleau, J. P., Grima-Pettenati, J., and Aronne, G. (2012). Xylem anatomy and cell wall ultrastructure of Nicotiana Tabacum after lignin genetic modification through transcriptional activator EGMYB2. IAWA J. 33, 269–286.
Emery, J. F., Floyd, S. K., Alvarez, J., Eshed, Y., Hawker, N. P., Izhaki, A., et al. (2003). Radial patterning of Arabidopsis shoots by class III HD-ZIP and KANADI genes. Curr. Biol. 13, 1768–1774. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.035
Goicoechea, M., Lacombe, E., Legay, S., Mihaljevic, S., Rech, P., Jauneau, A., et al. (2005). EgMYB2, a new transcriptional activator from Eucalyptus xylem, regulates secondary cell wall formation and lignin biosynthesis. Plant J. 43, 553–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02480.x
Grima-Pettenati, J., Soler, M., Camargo, E. L. O., and Wang, H. (2012). Transcriptional regulation of the lignin biosynthetic pathway revisited: new players and insights. Lignins Biosynth. Biodegrad. Bioeng. 61, 173–218.
Hamann, T., Benkova, E., Baurle, I., Kientz, M., and Jurgens, G. (2002). The Arabidopsis BODENLOS gene encodes an auxin response protein inhibiting MONOPTEROS-mediated embryo patterning. Genes Dev. 16, 1610–1615. doi: 10.1101/gad.229402
Hardtke, C. S., and Berleth, T. (1998). The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J. 17, 1405–1411. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1405
Hruz, T., Laule, O., Szabo, G., Wessendorp, F., Bleuler, S., Oertle, L., et al. (2008). Genevestigator v3: a reference expression database for the meta-analysis of transcriptomes. Adv. Bioinformatics 2008, 420747. doi: 10.1155/2008/420747
Ilegems, M., Douet, V., Meylan-Bettex, M., Uyttewaal, M., Brand, L., Bowman, J. L., et al. (2010). Interplay of auxin, KANADI and Class III HD-ZIP transcription factors in vascular tissue formation. Development 137, 975–984. doi: 10.1242/dev.047662
Jensen, J. K., Kim, H., Cocuron, J. C., Orler, R., Ralph, J., and Wilkerson, C. G. (2011). The DUF579 domain containing proteins IRX15 and IRX15-L affect xylan synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 66, 387–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04475.x
Kim, J., Jung, J. H., Reyes, J. L., Kim, Y. S., Kim, S. Y., Chung, K. S., et al. (2005). microRNA-directed cleavage of ATHB15 mRNA regulates vascular development in Arabidopsis inflorescence stems. Plant J. 42, 84–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02354.x
Ko, J. H., Kim, W. C., and Han, K. H. (2009). Ectopic expression of MYB46 identifies transcriptional regulatory genes involved in secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 60, 649–665. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03989.x
Ko, J. H., Yang, S. H., Park, A. H., Lerouxel, O., and Han, K. H. (2007). ANAC012, a member of the plant-specific NAC transcription factor family, negatively regulates xylary fiber development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 50, 1035–1048. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03109.x
Kubo, M., Udagawa, M., Nishikubo, N., Horiguchi, G., Yamaguchi, M., Ito, J., et al. (2005). Transcription switches for protoxylem and metaxylem vessel formation. Genes Dev. 19, 1855–1860. doi: 10.1101/gad.1331305
Legay, S., Sivadon, P., Blervacq, A. S., Pavy, N., Baghdady, A., Tremblay, L., et al. (2010). EgMYB1, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor from eucalyptus negatively regulates secondary cell wall formation in Arabidopsis and poplar. New Phytol. 188, 774–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03432.x
Love, J., Bjorklund, S., Vahala, J., Hertzberg, M., Kangasjarvi, J., and Sundberg, B. (2009). Ethylene is an endogenous stimulator of cell division in the cambial meristem of Populus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 5984–5989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811660106
MacMillan, C. P., Mansfield, S. D., Stachurski, Z. H., Evans, R., and Southerton, S. G. (2010). Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins: specialization for stem biomechanics and cell wall architecture in Arabidopsis and Eucalyptus. Plant J. 62, 689–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04181.x
McCarthy, R. L., Zhong, R., and Ye, Z. H. (2009). MYB83 is a direct target of SND1 and acts redundantly with MYB46 in the regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 50, 1950–1964. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp139
McConnell, J. R., Emery, J., Eshed, Y., Bao, N., Bowman, J., and Barton, M. K. (2001). Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature 411, 709–713. doi: 10.1038/35079635
Melzer, S., Lens, F., Gennen, J., Vanneste, S., Rohde, A., and Beeckman, T. (2008). Flowering-time genes modulate meristem determinacy and growth form in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Genet. 40, 1489–1492. doi: 10.1038/ng.253
Mitsuda, N., Iwase, A., Yamamoto, H., Yoshida, M., Seki, M., Shinozaki, K., et al. (2007). NAC transcription factors, NST1 and NST3, are key regulators of the formation of secondary walls in woody tissues of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 270–280. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.047043
Mitsuda, N., Seki, M., Shinozaki, K., and Ohme-Takagi, M. (2005). The NAC transcription factors NST1 and NST2 of Arabidopsis regulate secondary wall thickenings and are required for anther dehiscence. Plant Cell 17, 2993–3006. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.036004
Ohman, D., Demedts, B., Kumar, M., Gerber, L., Gorzsas, A., Goeminne, G., et al. (2013). MYB103 is required for FERULATE-5-HYDROXYLASE expression and syringyl lignin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis stems. Plant J. 73, 63–76. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12018
Okushima, Y., Overvoorde, P. J., Arima, K., Alonso, J. M., Chan, A., Chang, C., et al. (2005). Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana: unique and overlapping functions of ARF7 and ARF19. Plant Cell 17, 444–463. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.028316
Overvoorde, P. J., Okushima, Y., Alonso, J. M., Chan, A., Chang, C., Ecker, J. R., et al. (2005). Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 17, 3282–3300. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.036723
Ranocha, P., Denance, N., Vanholme, R., Freydier, A., Martinez, Y., Hoffmann, L., et al. (2010). Walls are thin 1 (WAT1), an Arabidopsis homolog of Medicago truncatula NODULIN21, is a tonoplast-localized protein required for secondary wall formation in fibers. Plant J. 63, 469–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04256.x
Rengel, D., San Clemente, H., Servant, F., Ladouce, N., Paux, E., Wincker, P., et al. (2009). A new genomic resource dedicated to wood formation in Eucalyptus. BMC Plant Biol. 9:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-36
Romano, J. M., Dubos, C., Prouse, M. B., Wilkins, O., Hong, H., Poole, M., et al. (2012). AtMYB61, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, functions as a pleiotropic regulator via a small gene network. New Phytol. 195, 774–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04201.x
Ruprecht, C., Mutwil, M., Saxe, F., Eder, M., Nikoloski, Z., and Persson, S. (2011). Large-scale co-expression approach to dissect secondary cell wall formation across plant species. Front. Plant Sci. 2:23. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00023
Wang, H., Avci, U., Nakashima, J., Hahn, M. G., Chen, F., and Dixon, R. A. (2010). Mutation of WRKY transcription factors initiates pith secondary wall formation and increases stem biomass in dicotyledonous plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 22338–22343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016436107
Yamaguchi, M., Ohtani, M., Mitsuda, N., Kubo, M., Ohme-Takagi, M., Fukuda, H., et al. (2010). VND-INTERACTING2, a NAC domain transcription factor, negatively regulates xylem vessel formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22, 1249–1263. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064048
Zhao, C., Avci, U., Grant, E. H., Haigler, C. H., and Beers, E. P. (2008). XND1, a member of the NAC domain family in Arabidopsis thaliana, negatively regulates lignocellulose synthesis and programmed cell death in xylem. Plant J. 53, 425–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03350.x
Zhong, R., Demura, T., and Ye, Z. H. (2006). SND1, a NAC domain transcription factor, is a key regulator of secondary wall synthesis in fibers of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18, 3158–3170. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.047399
Zhong, R., Lee, C., and Ye, Z. H. (2010). Evolutionary conservation of the transcriptional network regulating secondary cell wall biosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 625–632. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.007
Zhong, R., Lee, C., Zhou, J., McCarthy, R. L., and Ye, Z. H. (2008). A battery of transcription factors involved in the regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20, 2763–2782. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.061325
Zhong, R., Richardson, E. A., and Ye, Z. H. (2007a). The MYB46 transcription factor is a direct target of SND1 and regulates secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 2776–2792. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.053678
Zhong, R., Richardson, E. A., and Ye, Z. H. (2007b). Two NAC domain transcription factors, SND1 and NST1, function redundantly in regulation of secondary wall synthesis in fibers of Arabidopsis. Planta 225, 1603–1611. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0498-y
Zhong, R., and Ye, Z. H. (2012). MYB46 and MYB83 bind to the SMRE sites and directly activate a suite of transcription factors and secondary wall biosynthetic genes. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 368–380. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr185
Keywords: secondary cell wall, xylem, fibers, transcription factor, Arabidopsis, lignin, co-expression, biofuels
Citation: Cassan-Wang H, Goué N, Saidi MN, Legay S, Sivadon P, Goffner D and Grima-Pettenati J (2013) Identification of novel transcription factors regulating secondary cell wall formation in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 4:189. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00189
Received: 27 March 2013; Paper pending published: 10 April 2013;
Accepted: 23 May 2013; Published online: 11 June 2013.
Edited by:Maurice Bosch, Aberystwyth University, UK
Reviewed by:Akiyoshi Kawaoka, Nippon Paper Industries Co., Japan
Christian Dubos, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France
Copyright © 2013 Cassan-Wang, Goué, Saidi, Legay, Sivadon, Goffner and Grima-Pettenati. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
*Correspondence: Jacqueline Grima-Pettenati, Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, UMR5546, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Toulouse III, UPS, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge, BP 42617 Auzeville, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, Toulouse, France e-mail: email@example.com
†Present Address: Mohammed N. Saidi, Laboratoire des Biotechnologies Végétales Appliquées à l'Amélioration des Cultures, Ecole Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Sfax, Sfax, Tunisie;
Sylvain Legay, IJPB, UMR1318 INRA-AgroParis Tech, Versailles, France;
Pierre Sivadon, UMR 5254 IPREM, CNRS, Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, Pau, France;
Deborah Goffner, UMI 3189 Faculté de Médecine secteur Nord, Marseille, France