Reprogramming cells to study vacuolar development
- 1Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
- 2Southern Crop Protection and Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, London, ON, Canada
- 3School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
During vegetative and embryonic developmental transitions, plant cells are massively reorganized to support the activities that will take place during the subsequent developmental phase. Studying cellular and subcellular changes that occur during these short transitional periods can sometimes present challenges, especially when dealing with Arabidopsis thaliana embryo and seed tissues. As a complementary approach, cellular reprogramming can be used as a tool to study these cellular changes in another, more easily accessible, tissue type. To reprogram cells, genetic manipulation of particular regulatory factors that play critical roles in establishing or repressing the seed developmental program can be used to bring about a change of cell fate. During different developmental phases, vacuoles assume different functions and morphologies to respond to the changing needs of the cell. Lytic vacuoles (LVs) and protein storage vacuoles (PSVs) are the two main vacuole types found in flowering plants such as Arabidopsis. Although both are morphologically distinct and carry out unique functions, they also share some similar activities. As the co-existence of the two vacuole types is short-lived in plant cells, how they replace each other has been a long-standing curiosity. To study the LV to PSV transition, LEAFY COTYLEDON2, a key transcriptional regulator of seed development, was overexpressed in vegetative cells to activate the seed developmental program. At the cellular level, Arabidopsis leaf LVs were observed to convert to PSV-like organelles. This presents the opportunity for further research to elucidate the mechanism of LV to PSV transitions. Overall, this example demonstrates the potential usefulness of cellular reprogramming as a method to study cellular processes that occur during developmental transitions.
One of the most dramatic cellular changes that occur over the lifetime of a flowering plant happens during the transition between vegetative and embryonic developmental phases. Vegetative cells are massively reorganized to support embryonic development and vice versa (Mansfield and Briarty, 1991, 1992, 1996). The array of organelles present within the cells remains more or less constant, however, vegetative and embryonic cells are morphologically distinct (Figures 1A,B). At the subcellular level, what happens to the organelles during these transitions?
FIGURE 1. Transmission electron microscope images of Arabidopsis leaf (A) and seed (B) cells. Asterisk shows the LV and arrows point to PSVs. Bars = 2 μm.
Studying the cellular and subcellular changes that occur during these developmental transitions is challenging. Arabidopsis thaliana is the model organism of the plant community and has been adopted for genetic, physiology, molecular, and developmental biology research (Meyerowitz, 2001; Somerville and Koornneef, 2002). Thus, it is beneficial and practical to relate these areas of study to the cell biology of this plant. In Arabidopsis, however, it is difficult to study the cellular changes that occur during vegetative and embryonic developmental programs on account of the small seed size and technical challenges in isolating embryos from maternal tissues at early stages of embryogenesis (Girke et al., 2000; Xiang et al., 2011; Ibl and Stoger, 2012).
During different developmental stages of the plant life cycle, vacuoles assume diverse functions in response to the changing needs of the cell, and their morphology will be significantly different (Marty, 1999; Zouhar and Rojo, 2009). Due to its sheer size, the lytic vacuole (LV) is the most prominent organelle in the vegetative plant cell. Its counterpart, present in Arabidopsis seeds, is the protein storage vacuole (PSV) which looks nothing like the LV (Figures 1A,B). It is remarkable how such a large organelle (LV) can transform (Zheng and Staehelin, 2011) or be replaced (Hoh et al., 1995) by much smaller and more numerous PSVs and vice versa. Another intriguing issue is how the two vacuoles can have such drastically different functions; the LV is essential for water (Beebo et al., 2009) and ionic homeostasis (Isayenkov et al., 2010), plays a role in shaping vegetative cells (Rojo et al., 2001), and also acts as a cellular waste bin (Li and Vierstra, 2012). In contrast, the PSV stores protein (Scarafoni et al., 2001) and mineral reserves (Otegui et al., 2002) and therefore acts as a cellular pantry. PSVs are present as storage organelles in three of the world’s major food crops (Varshney et al., 2012); rice (Kawakatsu et al., 2010), wheat (Regvar et al., 2011), and maize (Reyes et al., 2011) and are prevalent in other important food sources such as nuts, legumes, and other cereals (Bethke et al., 1998; Hara-Nishimura et al., 1998; Robinson et al., 2005). Indeed, PSVs play an important role in supplying essential nutrients for our dietary needs. Here we discuss how cellular reprogramming can be used to learn more about LV to PSV transitions in Arabidopsis.
Lytic Vacuole Structure and Function
The central LV is the largest and most instantly recognizable organelle in a vegetative plant cell. It can account for up to 90% of the total cell volume (Jolliffe et al., 2005). As such, the LV squeezes the cytoplasm and other organelles between the tonoplast and plasma membrane (Figure 1A). LVs are present in the cells of young seedlings shortly after germination and generally exist in all cells throughout vegetative growth (Gattolin et al., 2009; Zheng and Staehelin, 2011).
The LV lumen contains water, numerous hydrolytic enzymes, and is maintained at a pH of 5.5–6 (Martinière et al., 2013). The tonoplast plays a major role in maintaining this luminal environment. The tonoplast is a selective membrane that contains a large number of channel and transport proteins that mediate the movement of organic and ionic substances between the cytoplasm and vacuole (Carter et al., 2004; Jaquinod et al., 2007; Müntz, 2007). To maintain an acidic luminal pH, vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) and pyrophosphatase (V-PPase) catalyze ATP-dependent proton transfer across the tonoplast. Their activity creates a proton gradient and membrane potential which energizes secondary active transport across the tonoplast (Yang et al., 2007; Krebs et al., 2010). The movement of inorganic metabolites is mediated by specific ion channels (Voelker et al., 2006) or transporters (Brini et al., 2007), while organic substances are moved by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (Shi et al., 2007; Song et al., 2010). The movement of water across the tonoplast is facilitated by water channels called aquaporins (Maurel et al., 2008). Within the vacuole lumen, numerous hydrolytic enzymes are present such as proteases, glycosidases, lipases, nucleases, and peroxidases (Carter et al., 2004).
The LV participates in diverse physical and metabolic functions that are critical for the survival of a plant. A significant role of the LV is to allow the cell to increase its size without expending too much energy. This allows lower cost cellular growth as vacuoles largely consist of water and have a low density of organic compounds to synthesize (Zouhar and Rojo, 2009). One universally important function of the LV is its role in maintaining turgor pressure which determines the rigidity of the cell and is important for growth and mechanical stability of the plant (Müntz, 2007). In addition to physical functions, LVs play important metabolic roles by storing a large variety of compounds such as toxins (Riechers et al., 2010), salts (Krebs et al., 2010), heavy metals (Song et al., 2010), pigments (Reuveni et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2006), and defense compounds (Zhao and Dixon, 2010). The low pH and numerous hydrolytic enzymes present in the LV lumen allow it to play a fundamental role in the degradation of cytoplasmic materials from small molecules to organelles. This process involves autophagy, a conserved mechanism in eukaryotes whereby cell contents are transferred to the vacuole to be digested and recycled, typically in a non-selective manner (Bassham, 2007; Li and Vierstra, 2012). Generally, a basal level of autophagy functions constitutively for the turnover of cellular components (Wang et al., 2013). However, it can be induced to higher levels during particular developmental stages (Bassham et al., 2006) or in times of cell stress (Liu et al., 2012). Endocytic trafficking of proteins from the plasma membrane is an essential cellular transport system required for cell communication, cellular differentiation, and physiological responses to the environment (Otegui and Spitzer, 2008; Irani and Russinova, 2009; Richter et al., 2009). The LV plays a key role as the cellular endpoint where selected endocytosed proteins are sent for degradation (Otegui and Spitzer, 2008).
Protein Storage Vacuole Structure and Function
The PSV is a specialized organelle that is unique to flowering plants (Wang et al., 2012). It is found predominantly in seeds and young meristematic plant cells (Olbrich et al., 2007; Gattolin et al., 2011). In shoot and root meristem cells, the existence of PSVs is thought to be due to the persistence of seed-specific signals in the meristem (Olbrich et al., 2007). Whereas LVs typically occupy most of the cell space, PSVs are much smaller in size and range from 1.5 to 8 μm in diameter (Gillespie et al., 2005). PSVs are numerous and are usually positioned close to the center of the cell (Shimada et al., 2008; Figure 1B).
The PSV is a compartmentalized organelle (Jiang et al., 2001; Bolte et al., 2011; Regvar et al., 2011). Comparatively less is known about the PSV tonoplast than the LV tonoplast (Isayenkov et al., 2010) but they are known to share some similarity in their composition of proteins (Hoh et al., 1995; Jiang et al., 2001; Isayenkov et al., 2011). The pH of the PSV lumen varies between 4.9 and 5.5 (Otegui et al., 2006). The defining feature of PSVs is their ability to accumulate seed storage proteins (SSPs). In fact, the appearance of PSVs in embryonic cells coincides with storage reserve accumulation during the maturation phase of embryogenesis (Mansfield and Briarty, 1992). Lesser recognized roles of PSVs are the storage of phosphorus and minerals (Otegui et al., 2002), protective compounds such as lectins (De Hoff et al., 2009) and chitinases (Neuhaus et al., 1991), and proteolytic enzymes (Gruis et al., 2004). Like their LV counterparts, PSVs are also involved in autophagy. PSVs of wheat and maize sequester SSPs from endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-derived protein bodies (Levanony et al., 1992) or prevacuolar-like compartments (Reyes et al., 2011) by autophagic mechanisms, respectively.
Vacuole Conversion during Embryonic and Vegetative Growth and Development
Multiple Vacuoles in Plant Cells
As discussed, seed plants have two principal, functionally distinct vacuole types, LVs and PSVs (Becker, 2007; Ibl and Stoger, 2012). This has raised questions about whether the two vacuoles co-exist in cells. To address this question, the two vacuole types must be distinguished. LVs and PSVs can be differentiated by the presence of tonoplast intrinsic protein (TIP) isoforms (Jauh et al., 1999; Gattolin et al., 2010). TIPs are aquaporins that are specifically localized to tonoplasts (Maurel et al., 2009). Arabidopsis has 10 TIP isoforms and two of these are used to discriminate between LVs and PSVs, TIP1;1 and TIP3;1, respectively (Johanson et al., 2001; Gattolin et al., 2010). In addition, a small number of soluble proteins have been shown to reside exclusively within the lumen of each vacuole type and thus also serve as markers to discriminate between both vacuole types. For example, the cysteine protease aleurain is targeted to the LV (Ahmed et al., 2000), and phaseolin and 2S albumin, the major SSPs of common bean and Arabidopsis, respectively, are targeted to PSVs (Frigerio et al., 1998; Miao et al., 2008). LVs and PSVs were originally proposed to co-exist in plant cells based on TIP and soluble protein localization studies undertaken in the 1990s (Paris et al., 1996; Park et al., 2004). This idea was attractive because it provided a convenient explanation for the diverse sorting signals and routes that proteins follow to arrive at the two vacuole types (Vitale and Raikhel, 1999; Vitale and Hinz, 2005; Frigerio et al., 2008; Rojo and Denecke, 2008). This theory was subsequently challenged as more insight was gained by studying TIP expression patterns. TIP3;1 and TIP1;1 expression were discovered to be tissue- and development-specific rather than organelle-specific (Hunter et al., 2007; Olbrich et al., 2007). Recently, a detailed map of TIP expression patterns in Arabidopsis has been produced to better understand the distribution pattern of these vacuolar markers (Gattolin et al., 2009, 2010, 2011). However, some differences in TIP expression patterns have been reported (Bolte et al., 2011). The current general view is that most cells contain one vacuolar type. However, both vacuoles have been shown to co-exist in some cells but their co-existence is usually short-lived (Hoh et al., 1995; Frigerio et al., 2008; Zheng and Staehelin, 2011).
Biogenesis of Vacuoles During Developmental Transitions
LV to PSV Transition
During Arabidopsis embryogenesis, a large LV forms in the fertilized zygote. The zygote then divides to produce a vacuolated basal cell (which will form the suspensor) and a non-vacuolated apical cell (which will give rise to the embryo; De Smet et al., 2010). As the embryo continues to divide, LVs develop in all cells (Zouhar and Rojo, 2009). During the maturation phase of embryogenesis, LVs are replaced by PSVs which will accumulate SSPs and mineral reserves (Mansfield and Briarty, 1991).
PSV to LV Transition
During germination, storage reserves are mobilized to provide nutrients and energy for the growing embryo (Pritchard et al., 2002; Tan-Wilson and Wilson, 2012). As protein and mineral reserves are released, PSVs are replaced by LVs. The LV subsequently increases in volume to create turgor and support cell growth and expansion (Mansfield and Briarty, 1996). In Arabidopsis, it takes approximately 3.5 d for the PSV to LV transition to occur (Hunter et al., 2007). PSV to LV transitions are also observed in root cells. PSVs are present in the radicle as it emerges from the seed coat. As the root elongates, meristematic regions of the root tip retain PSVs while PSVs transition to LVs in the distal regions of elongating roots (Olbrich et al., 2007; Gattolin et al., 2011; Zheng and Staehelin, 2011).
How do such morphologically distinct vacuoles replace each other in the cell during vegetative and embryonic transitions? We envisage two possible scenarios: either a new vacuolar type arises by remodeling of the pre-existing vacuole, or a new vacuole is formed de novo and very rapidly supersedes the existing one.
One means by which different vacuole types may replace each other is by remodeling or reprogramming the vacuole that is already present in the cell. Several studies support this hypothesis. During Arabidopsis germination and seedling development, Mansfield and Briarty (1996) observed multiple PSVs fusing to form a LV after the mobilization of most protein reserves. Olbrich et al. (2007) observed the formation of a single vacuole in barley and pea root tip cells. Close to the root tip, cells contain PSVs with TIP3;1 in their tonoplast. As root cells differentiate, the enlarging vacuole becomes a PSV–LV hybrid as indicated by the presence of both TIP3;1 and TIP1;1 and storage proteins in the lumen. The hybrid vacuole then gradually differentiates into a LV with increasing amounts of TIP1;1 and decreasing amounts of TIP3;1 in the tonoplast. Similarly, Zheng and Staehelin (2011) observed that PSVs in tobacco root tips were transformed into LVs. This PSV to LV transition involves unique, highly tissue-specific spatial and temporal changes in vacuole architecture. In addition, within some cell types, the transformation was shown to involve autophagosome formation and engulfment by the developing LV (Zheng and Staehelin, 2011).
De novo Vacuole Formation
An alternative hypothesis to explain how different vacuole types arise involves the independent generation of a vacuole within a cell that already has a pre-existing vacuole. A key study to support this theory was conducted by Hoh et al. (1995) who investigated the formation of PSVs in pea cotyledons during seed development. The authors observed the development of a tubular PSV structure which overtook the pre-existing LV. A second example backing this hypothesis is the demonstration that vacuoles can be regenerated from evacuolated protoplasts (Hörtensteiner et al., 1992; Di Sansebastiano et al., 2001). Using autophagy inhibitors, an autophagy-like mechanism was demonstrated to be involved in vacuole biogenesis of evacuolated tobacco protoplasts (Yano et al., 2007). However, the mechanism is distinct from conserved autophagy pathways (Bassham, 2007). Most recently, Viotti et al. (2013) also demonstrated the formation of autophagosome-like structures which give rise to LVs in Arabidopsis root tip cells but showed that these structures were not formed by the core autophagy machinery.
If the de novo theory holds true, then where does the membrane for a new vacuole originate? If an autophagy-like mechanism is involved in biogenesis, perhaps the tonoplast is generated by a process similar to autophagosome formation (Li and Vierstra, 2012). In autophagosome formation, the first step is the formation of an isolation membrane which occurs in the cytoplasm close to the vacuole. This process involves the recruitment of several autophagy-related (ATG) proteins which assemble in a coordinated manner to form a cup-shaped membrane structure that elongates and eventually engulfs material to be transported to the vacuole (Mizushima, 2007; Nakatogawa et al., 2009). Mutants defective in vacuole formation have been identified (Zouhar and Rojo, 2009). Most mutations affect factors involved in membrane fusion. An essential gene involved in vacuole biogenesis has been identified as VACUOLELESS1 (VCL1) through a mutant screen (Rojo et al., 2001). Loss-of-function vcl1 embryos were unable to form vacuoles. Mutants accumulated large numbers of autophagosomes which were unable to fuse to form the vacuole but instead would fuse with the plasma membrane and deliver their vacuolar contents to the apoplasm. Thus, VCL1 is proposed to be involved in regulating the fusion of autophagosomes to form a LV (Zouhar and Rojo, 2009). Tonoplasts have also been proposed to originate from the ER or the Golgi apparatus (Marty, 1978; Robinson and Hinz, 1997; Staehelin, 1997; Neuhaus and Rogers, 1998). Using mutants and pharmacological inhibitors which affect the biosynthetic secretory pathway, Viotti et al. (2013) demonstrated that tonoplast proteins and lipids were derived from the ER and were delivered directly, via a Golgi-independent route, to form the LV tonoplast.
Reprogramming Cells to Study Organelle Dynamics: Vacuoles
As an alternative to studying PSV formation in developing seeds, we asked if it was possible to induce the formation of PSVs in vegetative cells. Cues prompting vegetative cells to switch to PSV formation are not well understood. Despite the fact that SSPs are the major storage reserves that accumulate in PSVs, their forced synthesis in vegetative tissues has not been demonstrated to promote PSV formation. Constitutive expression of phaseolin in alfalfa vegetative tissues did not result in a significant accumulation of the protein in cells of non-seed organs (Bagga et al., 1992). Further, phaseolin was shown to accumulate and be degraded in the LV and, in part, secreted upon overexpression in tobacco (Frigerio et al., 1998). In transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing a chimeric 2S albumin gene, novel precursor-accumulating (PAC)-like vesicles were induced to form in leaves (Hayashi et al., 1999). Within a plant, PSVs are abundant in seed tissues and are also observed in meristematic cells in vegetative tissues (Olbrich et al., 2007). Thus it seems that for PSVs to exist, cells must be programmed to be in an embryonic state.
Genetic research has uncovered a number of genes that play critical roles in establishing or repressing embryonic cell fate (Braybrook and Harada, 2008; Zhang and Ogas, 2009; Jia et al., 2013b). Several transcription factors such as LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1; Lotan et al., 1998), LEC2 (Stone et al., 2001), FUSCA3 (FUS3; Gazzarrini et al., 2004), BABYBOOM (BBM; Boutilier et al., 2002), WUSCHEL (WUS; Zuo et al., 2002), EMBRYOMAKER (EMK; Tsuwamoto et al., 2010), and MYB118 (Wang et al., 2009) act during embryogenesis to promote seed developmental programs. In contrast, negative seed regulators such as PICKLE (PKL; Ogas et al., 1999), POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 2 (PRC2; Bouyer et al., 2011), SET DOMAIN GROUP 8 (SDG8; Tang et al., 2012b), BRAHMA (BRM; Tang et al., 2008), VP1/ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3-LIKE (VAL) genes (Suzuki et al., 2007) and microRNA166 (miR166; Tang et al., 2012a) are responsible for suppressing the seed program in vegetative tissues. Thus, overexpression or downregulation of these positive and negative seed regulators, respectively, will induce a seed-specific developmental program causing vegetative tissues to exhibit embryonic characteristics. This scenario presents an opportunity to study the cellular and subcellular changes that take place during this developmental transition.
The maturation phase of embryogenesis represents an exciting window of time to study organelle dynamics. One of the most distinctive activities that take place is a high level of storage reserve accumulation (Mansfield and Briarty, 1992). In Arabidopsis seeds, lipids and proteins usually accumulate up to 30–40% each of the seed dry weight. Lipids are stored in oil bodies which originate from the ER membrane (Hsieh and Huang, 2004) and PSVs arise to accumulate SSPs as discussed (Mansfield and Briarty, 1992). The events that take place during the maturation phase are controlled by the complex seed regulatory network introduced above (Santos-Mendoza et al., 2008). A key part of this control is achieved through the activities of a small number of transcriptional regulators; LEC1, LEC2, FUS3, and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3 (ABI3; Zhang and Ogas, 2009). Genetic studies showed that vegetative tissues overexpressing these transcription factors would begin to exhibit seed traits (Gazzarrini et al., 2004; Kagaya et al., 2005; Stone et al., 2008; Junker et al., 2012).
A wealth of genetic knowledge has been gathered on LEC2 activities (Stone et al., 2001, 2008; Kroj et al., 2003; Santos Mendoza et al., 2005; Braybrook et al., 2006; To et al., 2006; Baud et al., 2007). To learn more about the cellular changes that occur during the vegetative to embryonic transition, a dexamethasone (DEX)-inducible LEC2-GR expression system was exploited in Arabidopsis (Feeney et al., 2013). The overexpression of LEC2 triggers massive cellular reorganization in leaves and causes these vegetative organs to exhibit embryonic characteristics. Among the many cellular and subcellular changes, the replacement of LVs with PSV-like organelles was most notable. In these leaf cells, the large LV is replaced by smaller and more numerous vacuoles that contain SSP aggregates. Upon further investigation using immunogold labeling with tonoplast and luminal markers, it was established that the small vacuoles had the features of developing PSVs (Feeney et al., 2013). Indeed, the presence of the PSV-specific TIP3;1 protein on the tonoplast (Gattolin et al., 2011) and accumulation of SSPs within the lumen of the small vacuoles indicates that the leaf vacuoles assumed a storage role (Jauh et al., 1999; Hunter et al., 2007; Olbrich et al., 2007). Furthermore, confocal analysis revealed a unique embryo-like vacuolar morphology (Figures 2B,E). To visualize the tonoplast of these developing leaf PSVs, 35S:LEC2-GR plants co-expressing TIP3;1-YFP under its native promoter was generated. The native TIP3;1 promoter is developmentally regulated and thus the TIP3;1-YFP fusion is specifically expressed in seed tissues and accumulated on PSV tonoplasts (Hunter et al., 2007). As DEX-induced plants overexpressing LEC2 began to acquire embryogenic characteristics (Feeney et al., 2013), TIP3;1-YFP became detectable on the tonoplast of leaf cells, indicating that vacuoles were PSVs (Figures 2B,E). Highly fluorescent TIP3;1-YFP-labeled tonoplast folds and bulbs appeared (Saito et al., 2002, 2011). These are characteristic vacuolar morphologies of young cells (Figure 2A). However, the tonoplast also retained the characteristic configuration of a large LV lining the periphery of the cell. To highlight the vacuole lumen, tissues were stained with neutral red and revealed that the lumen appears to occupy the entire leaf cell (Figure 2B) unlike seed PSVs (Figure 2C). In addition, vacuolar lumina began to exhibit autofluorescence (Figure 2E), which was not observed in uninduced leaves (Figure 2D). Autofluorescent vacuole lumina are usually observed in seed PSVs (Figure 2F; Fuji et al., 2007; Hunter et al., 2007; Bolte et al., 2011). Therefore, leaf vacuole tonoplasts were extensively remodeled but their lumina remained large and filled the entire cell (Figures 2B,E). These results suggest that in response to DEX-inducible LEC2 overexpression, leaf LVs are replaced by PSV-like organelles that bear a resemblance to both LVs and PSVs. Therefore, it appears that as the Arabidopsis leaf LV is replaced by a PSV, the LV tonoplast remodels before being replaced by smaller-sized PSVs (Feeney et al., 2013). While these observations seem to point toward a remodeling of existing LVs into PSVs, they do not rule out the possibility of de novo biogenesis of PSVs, which may overlap with LV remodeling. The next question that will need to be addressed is therefore how exactly PSVs replace LVs during LEC2-induced leaf cell reprogramming.
FIGURE 2. Formation of PSV-like organelles in leaves overexpressing LEC2. Leaf epidermal cells from 35S:LEC2-GR plants co-expressing TIP3;1:TIP3;1-YFP and TIP1;1:TIP1;1-RFP (LEC2/TIP3-YFP/TIP1-RFP; Feeney et al., 2013) incubated on DEX to induce LEC2 expression (B,E) are compared to LEC2/TIP3-YFP/TIP1-RFP plants grown without DEX (D) or leaves of seedlings constitutively expressing 35S:TIP3;1-YFP (A). Leaf cell morphology is compared with cotyledonary cells of LEC2/TIP3-YFP/TIP1-RFP embryos (C,F). Note that TIP1;1:TIP1;1-RFP is not expressed in seeds and is not detected on LV tonoplasts in older vegetative tissues (D; Feeney et al., 2013). Green color: TIP3;1-YFP. Vacuolar lumina are highlighted with neutral red (B,C). In bottom images (D–F) red color is FM4-64 to label the plasma membrane and blue color is autofluorescence. Arrowheads in (C) indicate the plasma membrane. Bars = 10 μm.
A Challenge of Cellular Reprogramming: Know Your Genetic Regulator
A number of genetic factors have been revealed to promote cellular reprogramming and some are highlighted above. To bring about cellular changes, many of these factors are involved in complex genetic, biochemical, and physiological interactions (Gazzarrini et al., 2004; Gutierrez et al., 2007; Le et al., 2010; Xiang et al., 2011). These factors may act in a hierarchical order (Kagaya et al., 2005; To et al., 2006) and may become active at slightly different developmental times (Le et al., 2010; Willmann et al., 2011). Thus, while many of the factors display a redundancy in promoting cellular reprogramming, they may also display unique activities that affect distinct cellular processes (Baud et al., 2007; Jia et al., 2013a). These aspects should be taken into consideration when choosing a reprogramming system to study a particular cellular process. In the case of vacuoles, several factors may cause vacuolar transitions in vegetative tissues. We have demonstrated that LEC2 overexpression causes LVs to transition to PSVs and results from overexpression studies with LEC1 (Junker et al., 2012) and FUS3 (Gazzarrini et al., 2004) are suggestive that these transcription factors can also bring about a change in vacuole type.
Cellular reprogramming may be a useful means of allowing the study of cellular processes that take place during the short transitional period between two developmental programs. Several genes have been discovered that control embryonic cell identity by establishing or repressing the seed developmental program (Braybrook and Harada, 2008; Zhang and Ogas, 2009; Jia et al., 2013b). In the example presented in this review, overexpression of LEC2 was used to activate the seed developmental program in Arabidopsis leaves (Santos Mendoza et al., 2005; Stone et al., 2008). This system could then be used to study the cellular and subcellular changes that ensue during the vegetative to embryonic transition (Feeney et al., 2013). The observation that LVs were replaced by PSV-like organelles in leaves presents an opportunity to elucidate the mechanism of LV to PSV transitions in Arabidopsis. Overall, we foresee that the major advantage of cellular reprogramming in vegetative tissues is to provide a convenient and complementary system in which to study cellular processes that normally occur during developmental transitions in developing seeds–tissues that are technically challenging to work with.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank J. J. Harada for his ideas and helpful discussions and J. McNeil for reviewing the manuscript. This work was supported by the A-base Funding Program of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Work in the Frigerio lab was funded by a grant from the Leverhulme Trust (RPG-327).
Ahmed, S. U., Rojo, E., Kovaleva, V., Venkataraman, S., Dombrowski, J. E., Matsuoka, K., et al. (2000). The plant vacuolar sorting receptor AtELP is involved in transport of NH2-terminal propeptide-containing vacuolar proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Cell Biol. 149, 1335–1344. doi: 10.1083/jcb.149.7.1335
Bagga, S., Sutton, D., Kemp, J., and Sengupta-Gopalan, C. (1992). Constitutive expression of the β-phaseolin gene in different tissues of transgenic alfalfa does not ensure phaseolin accumulation in non-seed tissue. Plant Mol. Biol. 19, 951–958. doi: 10.1007/BF00040527
Baud, S., Santos Mendoza, M., To, A., Harscoët, E., Lepiniec, L., and Dubreucq, B. (2007). WRINKLED1 specifies the regulatory action of LEAFY COTYLEDON2 towards fatty acid metabolism during seed maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 50, 825–838. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03092.x
Beebo, A., Thomas, D., Der, C., Sanchez, L., Leborgne-Castel, N., Marty, F., et al. (2009). Life with and without AtTIP1;1, an Arabidopsis aquaporin preferentially localized in the apposing tonoplasts of adjacent vacuoles. Plant Mol. Biol. 70, 193–209. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9465-2
Bethke, P. C., Swanson, S. J., Hillmer, S., and Jones, R. L. (1998). From storage compartment to lytic organelle: the metamorphosis of the aleurone protein storage vacuole. Ann. Bot. 82, 399–412. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0702
Bolte, S., Lanquar, V., Soler, M.-N., Beebo, A., Satiat-Jeunemaître, B., Bouhidel, K., et al. (2011). Distinct lytic vacuolar compartments are embedded inside the protein storage vacuole of dry and germinating Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Plant Cell Physiol. 52, 1142–1152. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pBR065
Boutilier, K., Offringa, R., Sharma, V. K., Kieft, H., Ouellet, T., Zhang, L., et al. (2002). Ectopic expression of BABY BOOM triggers a conversion from vegetative to embryonic growth. Plant Cell 14, 1737–1749. doi: 10.1105/tpc.001941
Bouyer, D., Roudier, F., Heese, M., Andersen, E. D., Gey, D., Nowack, M. K., et al. (2011). Polycomb repressive complex 2 controls the embryo-to-seedling phase transition. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002014
Braybrook, S. A., Stone, S. L., Park, S., Bui, A. Q., Le, B. H., Fischer, R. L., et al. (2006). Genes directly regulated by LEAFY COTYLEDON2 provide insight into the control of embryo maturation and somatic embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 3468–3473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511331103
Brini, F., Hanin, M., Mezghani, I., Berkowitz, G. A., and Masmoudi, K. (2007). Overexpression of wheat Na+/H+ antiporter TNHX1 and H+-pyrophosphatase TVP1 improve salt- and drought-stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana plants. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 301–308. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl251
Carter, C., Pan, S., Zouhar, J., Avila, E. L., Girke, T., and Raikhel, N. V. (2004). The vegetative vacuole proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals predicted and unexpected proteins. Plant Cell 16, 3285–3303. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.027078
Di Sansebastiano, G. P., Paris, N., Marc-Martin, S., and Neuhaus, J.-M. (2001). Regeneration of a lytic central vacuole and of neutral peripheral vacuoles can be visualized by green fluorescent proteins targeted to either type of vacuoles. Plant Physiol. 126, 78–86. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.1.78
Feeney, M., Frigerio, L., Cui, Y., and Menassa, R. (2013). Following vegetative to embryonic cellular changes in leaves of Arabidopsis overexpressing LEAFY COTYLEDON2. Plant Physiol. 162, 1881–1896. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.220996
Fuji, K., Shimada, T., Takahashi, H., Tamura, K., Koumoto, Y., Utsumi, S., et al. (2007). Arabidopsis vacuolar sorting mutants (green fluorescent seed) can be identified efficiently by secretion of vacuole-targeted green fluorescent protein in their seeds. Plant Cell 19, 597–609. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.045997
Gattolin, S., Sorieul, M., and Frigerio, L. (2011). Mapping of tonoplast intrinsic proteins in maturing and germinating Arabidopsis seeds reveals dual localization of embryonic TIPs to the tonoplast and plasma membrane. Mol. Plant 4, 180–189. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq051
Gattolin, S., Sorieul, M., Hunter, P., Khonsari, R., and Frigerio, L. (2009). In vivo imaging of the tonoplast intrinsic protein family in Arabidopsis roots. BMC Plant Biol. 9:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-133
Gazzarrini, S., Tsuchiya, Y., Lumba, S., Okamoto, M., and McCourt, P. (2004). The transcription factor FUSCA3 controls developmental timing in Arabidopsis through the hormones gibberellin and abscisic acid. Dev. Cell 7, 373–385. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.017
Gillespie, J., Rogers, S. W., Deery, M., Dupree, P., and Rogers, J. C. (2005). A unique family of proteins associated with internalized membranes in protein storage vacuoles of the Brassicaceae. Plant J. 41, 429–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02303.x
Gruis, D., Schulze, J., and Jung, R. (2004). Storage protein accumulation in the absence of the vacuolar processing enzyme family of cysteine proteases. Plant Cell 16, 270–290. doi: 10.1105/tpc.016378
Hara-Nishimura, I., Shimada, T., Hatano, K., Takeuchi, Y., and Nishimura, M. (1998). Transport of storage proteins to protein storage vacuoles is mediated by large precursor-accumulating vesicles. Plant Cell 10, 825–836. doi:10.1105/tpc.10.5.825
Hayashi, M., Toriyama, K., Kondo, M., Hara-Nishimura, I., and Nishimura, M. (1999). Accumulation of a fusion protein containing 2S albumin induces novel vesicles in vegetative cells of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 40, 263–272. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029537
Hörtensteiner, S., Martinoia, E., and Amrhein, N. (1992). Reappearance of hydrolytic activities and tonoplast proteins in the regenerated vacuole of evacuolated protoplasts. Planta 187, 113–121. doi: 10.1007/BF00201632
Hunter, P. R., Craddock, C. P., Di Benedetto, S., Roberts, L. M., and Frigerio, L. (2007). Fluorescent reporter proteins for the tonoplast and the vacuolar lumen identify a single vacuolar compartment in Arabidopsis cells. Plant Physiol. 145, 1371–1382. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.103945
Jaquinod, M., Villiers, F., Kieffer-Jaquinod, S., Hugouvieux, V., Bruley, C., Garin, J., et al. (2007). A proteomics dissection of Arabidopsis thaliana vacuoles isolated from cell culture. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 394–412. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M600250-MCP200
Jia, H., McCarty, D. R., and Suzuki, M. (2013a). Distinct roles of LAFL network genes in promoting the embryonic seedling fate in the absence of VAL repression. Plant Physiol. 163, 1293–1305. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.220988
Jia, H., Suzuki, M., and McCarty, D. R. (2013b). Regulation of the seed to seedling developmental phase transition by the LAFL and VAL transcription factor networks. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. doi: 10.1002/wdev.126
Jiang, L., Phillips, T. E., Hamm, C. A., Drozdowicz, Y. M., Rea, P. A., Maeshima, M., et al. (2001). The protein storage vacuole: a unique compound organelle. J. Cell Biol. 155, 991–1002. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200107012
Johanson, U., Karlsson, M., Johansson, I., Gustavsson, S., Sjövall, S., Fraysse, L., et al. (2001). The complete set of genes encoding major intrinsic proteins in Arabidopsis provides a framework for a new nomenclature for major intrinsic proteins in plants. Plant Physiol. 126, 1358–1369. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.4.1358
Junker, A., Mönke, G., Rutten, T., Keilwagen, J., Seifert, M., Thi, T. M. N., et al. (2012). Elongation-related functions of LEAFY COTYLEDON1 during the development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 71, 427–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04999.x
Kagaya, Y., Toyoshima, R., Okuda, R., Usui, H., Yamamoto, A., and Hattori, T. (2005). LEAFY COTYLEDON1 controls seed storage protein genes through its regulation of FUSCA3 and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3. Plant Cell Physiol. 46, 399–406. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci048
Kawakatsu, T., Hirose, S., Yasuda, H., and Takaiwa, F. (2010). Reducing rice seed storage protein accumulation leads to changes in nutrient quality and storage organelle formation. Plant Physiol. 154, 1842–1854. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.164343
Krebs, M., Beyhl, D., Görlich, E., Al-Rasheid, K. A. S., Marten, I., Stierhof, Y.-D., et al. (2010). Arabidopsis V-ATPase activity at the tonoplast is required for efficient nutrient storage but not for sodium accumulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 3251–3256. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913035107
Le, B. H., Cheng, C., Bui, A. Q., Wagmaister, J. A., Henry, K. F., Pelletier, J., et al. (2010). Global analysis of gene activity during Arabidopsis seed development and identification of seed-specific transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 8063–8070. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003530107
Liu, Y., Burgos, J. S., Deng, Y., Srivastava, R., Howell, S. H., and Bassham, D. C. (2012). Degradation of the endoplasmic reticulum by autophagy during endoplasmic reticulum stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 4635–4651. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.101535
Lotan, T., Ohto, M.-a., Yee, K. M., West, M. A. L., Lo, R., Kwong, R. W., et al. (1998). Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 93, 1195–1205. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81463-4
Mansfield, S. G., and Briarty, L. G. (1996). The dynamics of seedling and cotyledon cell development in Arabidopsis thaliana during reserve mobilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, 280–295. doi: 10.1086/297347
Martinière, A., Bassil, E., Jublanc, E., Alcon, C., Reguera, M., Sentenac, H., et al. (2013). In vivo intracellular pH measurements in tobacco and Arabidopsis reveal an unexpected pH gradient in the endomembrane system. Plant Cell doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.116897 [Epub ahead of print].
Maurel, C., Santoni, V., Luu, D.-T., Wudick, M. M., and Verdoucq, L. (2009). The cellular dynamics of plant aquaporin expression and functions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 690–698. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.09.002
Maurel, C., Verdoucq, L., Luu, D.-T., and Santoni, V. (2008). Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 595–624. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092734
Miao, Y., Li, K. Y., Li, H.-Y., Yao, X., and Jiang, L. (2008). The vacuolar transport of aleurain-GFP and 2S albumin-GFP fusions is mediated by the same pre-vacuolar compartments in tobacco BY-2 and Arabidopsis suspension cultured cells. Plant J. 56, 824–839. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03645.x
Neuhaus, J.-M., Sticher, L., Meins, F., and Boller, T. (1991). A short C-terminal sequence is necessary and sufficient for the targeting of chitinases to the plant vacuole. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 10362–10366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10362
Ogas, J., Kaufmann, S., Henderson, J., and Somerville, C. (1999). PICKLE is a CHD3 chromatin-remodeling factor that regulates the transition from embryonic to vegetative development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 13839–13844. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13839
Olbrich, A., Hillmer, S., Hinz, G., Oliviusson, P., and Robinson, D. G. (2007). Newly formed vacuoles in root meristems of barley and pea seedlings have characteristics of both protein storage and lytic vacuoles. Plant Physiol. 145, 1383–1394. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.108985
Otegui, M. S., Capp, R., and Staehelin, L. A. (2002). Developing seeds of Arabidopsis store different minerals in two types of vacuoles and in the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Cell 14, 1311–1327. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010486
Otegui, M. S., Herder, R., Schulze, J., Jung, R., and Staehelin, L. A. (2006). The proteolytic processing of seed storage proteins in Arabidopsis embryo cells starts in the multivesicular bodies. Plant Cell 18, 2567–2581. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.040931
Park, M., Kim, S. J., Vitale, A., and Hwang, I. (2004). Identification of the protein storage vacuole and protein targeting to the vacuole in leaf cells of three plant species. Plant Physiol. 134, 625–639. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.030635
Pritchard, S. L., Charlton, W. L., Baker, A., and Graham, I. A. (2002). Germination and storage reserve mobilization are regulated independently in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 31, 639–647. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01376.x
Regvar, M., Eichert, D., Kaulich, B., Gianoncelli, A., Pongrac, P., Vogel-Mikuš, K., et al. (2011). New insights into globoids of protein storage vacuoles in wheat aleurone using synchrotron soft X-ray microscopy. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 3929–3939. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err090
Reuveni, M., Evenor, D., Artzi, B., Perl, A., and Erner, Y. (2001). Decrease in vacuolar pH during petunia flower opening is reflected in the activity of tonoplast H+-ATPase. J. Plant Physiol. 158, 991–998. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-00302
Reyes, F. C., Chung, T., Holding, D., Jung, R., Vierstra, R., and Otegui, M. S. (2011). Delivery of prolamins to the protein storage vacuole in maize aleurone cells. Plant Cell 23, 769–784. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.082156
Robinson, D. G., and Hinz, G. (1997). Vacuole biogenesis and protein transport to the plant vacuole: a comparison with the yeast vacuole and the mammalian lysosome. Protoplasma 197, 1–25. doi: 10.1007/BF01279880
Rojo, E., Gillmor, C. S., Kovaleva, V., Somerville, C. R., and Raikhel, N. V. (2001). VACUOLELESS1 is an essential gene required for vacuole formation and morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 1, 303–310. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00024-7
Saito, C., Ueda, T., Abe, H., Wada, Y., Kuroiwa, T., Hisada, A., et al. (2002). A complex and mobile structure forms a distinct subregion within the continuous vacuolar membrane in young cotyledons of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 29, 245–255. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01189.x
Saito, C., Uemura, T., Awai, C., Tominaga, M., Ebine, K., Ito, J., et al. (2011). The occurrence of ‘bulbs’, a complex configuration of the vacuolar membrane, is affected by mutations of vacuolar SNARE and phospholipase in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 68, 64–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04665.x
Santos-Mendoza, M., Dubreucq, B., Baud, S., Parcy, F., Caboche, M., and Lepiniec, L. (2008). Deciphering gene regulatory networks that control seed development and maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 54, 608–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03461.x
Santos Mendoza, M., Dubreucq, B., Miquel, M., Caboche, M., and Lepiniec, L. (2005). LEAFY COTYLEDON2 activation is sufficient to trigger the accumulation of oil and seed specific mRNAs in Arabidopsis leaves. FEBS Lett. 579, 4666–4670. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.07.037
Scarafoni, A., Carzaniga, R., Harris, N., and Croy, R. D. (2001). Manipulation of the napin primary structure alters its packaging and deposition in transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) seeds. Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 727–739. doi: 10.1023/A:1011675918805
Shi, J., Wang, H., Schellin, K., Li, B., Faller, M., Stoop, J. M., et al. (2007). Embryo-specific silencing of a transporter reduces phytic acid content of maize and soybean seeds. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 930–937. doi: 10.1038/nbt1322
Shimada, T. L., Shimada, T., Takahashi, H., Fukao, Y., and Hara-Nishimura, I. (2008). A novel role for oleosins in freezing tolerance of oilseeds in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 55, 798–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03553.x
Song, W.-Y., Park, J., Mendoza-Cózatl, D. G., Suter-Grotemeyer, M., Shim, D., Hörtensteiner, S., et al. (2010). Arsenic tolerance in Arabidopsis is mediated by two ABCC-type phytochelatin transporters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 21187–21192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013964107
Stone, S. L., Braybrook, S. A., Paula, S. L., Kwong, L. W., Meuser, J., Pelletier, J., et al. (2008). Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON2 induces maturation traits and auxin activity: implications for somatic embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 3151–3156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712364105
Stone, S. L., Kwong, L. W., Yee, K. M., Pelletier, J., Lepiniec, L., Fischer, R. L., et al. (2001). LEAFY COTYLEDON2 encodes a B3 domain transcription factor that induces embryo development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 11806–11811. doi: 10.1073/pnas.201413498
Suzuki, M., Wang, H. H. Y., and McCarty, D. R. (2007). Repression of the LEAFY COTYLEDON 1/B3 regulatory network in plant embryo development by VP1/ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3-LIKE B3 genes. Plant Physiol. 143, 902–911. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.092320
Tang, X., Bian, S., Tang, M., Lu, Q., Li, S., Liu, X., et al. (2012a). MicroRNA–mediated repression of the seed maturation program during vegetative development in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 8:e1003091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003091
Tang, X., Lim, M.-H., Pelletier, J., Tang, M., Nguyen, V., Keller, W. A., et al. (2012b). Synergistic repression of the embryonic programme by SET DOMAIN GROUP 8 and EMBRYONIC FLOWER 2 in Arabidopsis seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 1391–1404. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err383
Tang, X., Hou, A., Babu, M., Nguyen, V., Hurtado, L., Lu, Q., et al. (2008). The Arabidopsis BRAHMA chromatin-remodeling ATPase is involved in repression of seed maturation genes in leaves. Plant Physiol. 147, 1143–1157. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.121996
To, A., Valon, C., Savino, G., Guilleminot, J., Devic, M., Giraudat, J., et al. (2006). A network of local and redundant gene regulation governs Arabidopsis seed maturation. Plant Cell 18, 1642–1651. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.039925
Tsuwamoto, R., Yokoi, S., and Takahata, Y. (2010). Arabidopsis EMBRYOMAKER encoding an AP2 domain transcription factor plays a key role in developmental change from vegetative to embryonic phase. Plant Mol. Biol. 73, 481–492. doi: 10.1007/s11103-010-9634-3
Varshney, R. K., Ribaut, J.-M., Buckler, E. S., Tuberosa, R., Rafalski, J. A., and Langridge, P. (2012). Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops? Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1172–1176. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2440
Viotti, C., Krüger, F., Krebs, M., Neubert, C., Fink, F., Lupanga, U., et al. (2013). The endoplasmic reticulum is the main membrane source for biogenesis of the lytic vacuole in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 3434–3449. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.114827
Voelker, C., Schmidt, D., Mueller-Roeber, B., and Czempinski, K. (2006). Members of the Arabidopsis AtTPK/KCO family form homomeric vacuolar channels in planta. Plant J. 48, 296–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02868.x
Wang, J., Tse, Y. C., Hinz, G., Robinson, D. G., and Jiang, L. (2012). Storage globulins pass through the Golgi apparatus and multivesicular bodies in the absence of dense vesicle formation during early stages of cotyledon development in mung bean. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 1367–1380. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err366
Wang, X., Niu, Q.-W., Teng, C., Li, C., Mu, J., Chua, N.-H., et al. (2009). Overexpression of PGA37/MYB118 and MYB115 promotes vegetative-to-embryonic transition in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 19, 224–235. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.276
Xiang, D., Venglat, P., Tibiche, C., Yang, H., Risseeuw, E., Cao, Y., et al. (2011). Genome-wide analysis reveals gene expression and metabolic network dynamics during embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 156, 346–356. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.171702
Yang, H., Knapp, J., Koirala, P., Rajagopal, D., Peer, W. A., Silbart, L. K., et al. (2007). Enhanced phosphorus nutrition in monocots and dicots over-expressing a phosphorus-responsive type I H+-pyrophosphatase. Plant Biotechnol. J. 5, 735–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00281.x
Zhang, H., Wang, L., Deroles, S., Bennett, R., and Davies, K. (2006). New insight into the structures and formation of anthocyanic vacuolar inclusions in flower petals. BMC Plant Biol. 6:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-6-29
Zheng, H., and Staehelin, L. A. (2011). Protein storage vacuoles are transformed into lytic vacuoles in root meristematic cells of germinating seedlings by multiple, cell type-specific mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 155, 2023–2035. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.170159
Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana, cellular reprogramming, developmental transition, LEAFY COTYLEDON2, lytic vacuole, protein storage vacuole, vacuole biogenesis
Citation: Feeney M, Frigerio L, Kohalmi SE, Cui Y and Menassa R (2013) Reprogramming cells to study vacuolar development. Front. Plant Sci. 4:493. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00493
Received: 28 September 2013; Paper pending published: 21 October 2013;
Accepted: 15 November 2013; Published online: 03 December 2013.
Edited by:Marisa Otegui, University of Wisconsin at Madison, USA
Reviewed by:Douglas Muench, University of Calgary, Canada
Diane C. Bassham, Iowa State University, USA
Marcela Rojas-Pierce, North Carolina State University, USA
Copyright © 2013 Feeney, Frigerio, Kohalmi, Cui and Menassa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mistianne Feeney, School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK e-mail: email@example.com