The ecological relevance of maturation drying determines dehydrin expression in seeds
In areas exhibiting typical seasonal changes, the seeds of most plants are getting mature in summer and fall, respectively. In order to prevent the destruction of the young and sensitive seedlings by the frosty winter conditions, any germination in fall has to be hindered. Accordingly, efficient outlasting mechanisms have been evolved to avoid or at least to minimize such wastages by suppressing the germination of mature seeds in the fall and allow the seeds to overwinter without any loss of their viability (Bewley, 1997). Yet, such persistence requires strongly reduced metabolic activity, i.e., by the reduction of the water content. Accordingly, apart from the suppression of germination, desiccation tolerance is a precondition for the overwintering of the seeds (for review see Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger, 2006). In this manner, during the last phase of embryogenesis, the water content of the seeds is strongly reduced in a process denoted as maturation drying. As result the seeds become dormant. In the succeeding spring, i.e., after a prolonged cold period, dormancy is broken (vernalization) and seeds are considered as quiescent (Baskin and Baskin, 2004). As soon as sufficient water is available, the quiescent seeds imbibe and germinate. In contrast to such orthodox seeds, seeds of most tropical plants are able to germinate as soon as the fruits are mature (for review see Farnsworth, 2000). In tropical rainforests there are no unfavorable climatic conditions that have to be overcome, since there is no necessity for putative outlasting mechanisms. In contrast, any extension of the exposition of ungerminated seeds would enhance the risk of being eaten by herbivores or being infected by pathogens. Accordingly, the seeds of most tropical plants have not evolved outlasting mechanisms, and, most tropical seeds are recalcitrant: Dormancy is lacking (e.g., Jurado and Flores, 2005) and they do not reveal a maturation drying (Berjak et al., 1989). As a result, recalcitrant seeds cannot be stored for a long period of time without losing their viability. The most popular plants that exhibit recalcitrant seeds are: avocado, cocoa, mango, lychee, and the rubber tree.
Indeed, these ecological cognitions have been well known for several decades. Yet, due to the fact that recalcitrant seeds are not storable, in many scientific articles—especially those focusing on breeding, seed production and seed storage—recalcitrance per se is considered a negative property (e.g., Farnsworth, 2000). In consequence, many efforts are made to overcome the apparent drawbacks of recalcitrance by improving the seed storability of plants used in agronomy.
Maturation drying corresponds to drought stress of seeds
Just as the breeders, who—due to their particular perspectives—generally focus on only one aspect of recalcitrance, also molecular biologists frequently exhibit a restricted cognition of recalcitrance and maturation drying. This, in particular, applies for the assessment of dehydrins and their relevance with respect to the storage of recalcitrant seeds. Accordingly, frequently it is stated that “the lack of desiccation tolerance might be related to the absence of dehydrins” (e.g., Farrant et al., 1996; Hundertmark et al., 2011). There is no doubt that dehydrins, jointly with other protective mechanisms, such as other LEA proteins are relevant for the desiccation tolerance and storability of vital seeds (Delahaie et al., 2013). However, we have to omit confounding cause and effect. Commonly in scientific articles it is outlined that “LEA proteins (and thus dehydrins) are intensively synthesized during seed development as a part of the embryogenesis program” (e.g., Kalemba and Pukacka, 2007). But, it is the occurrence of the maturation drying, which in particular induces the various drought stress related reactions, such as the expression of dehydrins. When maturation drying is lacking, the corresponding stress responses are not induced and the protective mechanisms are missing. In consequence, the seeds are desiccation sensitive and loose their viability when stored for a longer time. In contrast, seeds which have undergone a maturation drying are desiccation tolerant and are enabled to remain vital whilst storage.
The basic mechanisms occurring in seeds undergoing a maturation drying, in principle, are the same as in leaves exposed to drought stress. In leaves subjected to various stress situations, particularly to drought stress, dehydrins are synthesized as part of the protective response (for review see Close, 1997; Hara, 2010). Consequently, the occurrence of dehydrins in seeds undergoing a maturation drying has to be considered as a direct response to drought stress. Although the direct mode of action of dehydrins with respect to drought resistance has not yet been unequivocally proved, their fundamental relevance is out of question (for review see Hara, 2010). As outlined above, alike to the well-known stress responses in leaves, also the corresponding water shortage during maturation drying induces the various protective mechanisms, such as the production of dehydrins. These coherences become particularly obvious when comparing the dehydrin expression in orthodox and recalcitrant seeds (Figure 1). Whereas orthodox seeds—as response to the maturation drying—synthesize dehydrins, in recalcitrant seeds these small protective proteins are lacking, putatively due to the absence of any maturation drying (e.g., Avicennia marina, Bruguiera cylindrical; Farrant et al., 1992, 1996). In consequence orthodox seeds retain their viability during storage, and recalcitrant ones die.
Figure 1
These insights become even more apparent, when focusing on so-called intermediate seeds, e.g., those of the coffee tree (Coffea arabica, Figure 1). Like recalcitrant seeds, coffee seeds do not undergo a maturation drying. In consequence, no dehydrins are expressed. However, like orthodox seeds, coffee seeds could be dried without losing their viability, e.g., during the course of green coffee processing. It turned out that directly after the onset of drying, dehydrins are expressed and synthesized (Kramer et al., 2010). As consequence of the dehydrin accumulation—in concert with various other protective mechanisms—seeds acquire desiccation tolerance. Accordingly, dried coffee seeds can be stored without losing their viability (Selmar et al., 2008). A corresponding drying related induction of dehydrin expression was reported for the seeds of Barringtonia racemosa (Farrant et al., 1996). In this context we have to consider that—in contrast to many citations classifying Barringtonia seeds as recalcitrant—these seeds have to be denoted as intermediate: they are able to withstand artificial drying and remain viable for many months (Baskin and Baskin, 2001).
On a first glance, the situation becomes much more confusing and seems to be contradictory, when considering various recalcitrant plants, whose seeds are reported to express dehydrins, e.g., Castanea sativa (Finch-Savage et al., 1994), Aesculus hippocastaneum, Camellia sinensis (Farrant et al., 1996), Castanospermum australe (Han et al., 1997), Euterpe edulis (Panza et al., 2007), and Quercus robur (Šunderlíková et al., 2009). However, a detailed analysis of the particular situation reveals that also in these cases the order of events also matches the scheme shown in Figure 1: the seeds of theses atypical recalcitrant plants, e.g., those from Quercus robur; Euterpe edulis, indeed undergo a faint maturation drying (e.g., Finch-Savage et al., 1992). The corresponding water loss obviously is sufficient to induce dehydrin expression and other stress responses. In consequence, the partially dried seeds can be stored for a limited time, e.g., to outlast the forthcoming winter season. However, this storability is limited and any longer storage of these recalcitrant seeds results in the loss of their viability.
Apart from stress related dehydrin expression, certain types of dehydrins might also be expressed constitutively, acting as some kind of house-keeping genes, too (Hara et al., 2011). In this manner, Šunderlíková et al. (2009) reported that apart from the YnSKn type, which is expressed in response to osmotic or desiccation stress in oak embryos, two Kn type dehydrins are expressed constitutively. Moreover, dehydrins are thought to be involved in developmental processes, such as germination (Gumilevskaya and Azarkovich, 2010), and their expression is related to organ type and developmental stage (e.g., Vaseva et al., 2014).
Based on the insights expounded in this article, many putative discrepancies in the perceptions of maturation drying, storability, and recalcitrance should be eliminated. Nonetheless, there are still many questions to be answered and comprehensive and comparative studies are required. Special emphasis should be put on dehydrin expression, its accumulation and the corresponding regulation in recalcitrant, intermediate, and orthodox seeds whilst maturation drying, and in leaves facing drought stress.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BaskinC. C.BaskinJ. M. (2001). Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2
BaskinJ. M.BaskinC. C. (2004). A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 14, 1–16. 10.1079/SSR2003150
3
BerjakP.FarrantJ. M.PammenterN. W. (1989). The basis of recalcitrant seed behaviour, in Recent Advances in the Development and Germination of Seeds, NATO ASI Series, Vol. 187, ed TaylorsonR. B. (New York, NY: Plenum Press), 89–108. 10.1007/978-1-4613-0617-7_8
4
BewleyJ. D. (1997). Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell9, 1055–10661. 10.1105/tpc.9.7.1055
5
CloseT. J. (1997). Dehydrins: a commonality in the response of plants to dehydration and low temperature. Physiol. Plant100, 291–296. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04785.x
6
DelahaieJ.HundertmarkM.BoveJ.LeprinceO.RogniauxH.BuitinkJ. (2013). LEA polypeptide profiling of recalcitrant and orthodox legume seeds reveals ABI3-regulated LEA protein abundance linked to desiccation tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 4559–4573. 10.1093/jxb/ert274
7
FarnsworthE. (2000). The ecology and physiology of viviparous and recalcitrant plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 7–38. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.107
8
FarrantJ. M.PammenterN. W.BerjakP. (1992). Development of the recalcitrant (homoiohydrous) seeds of Avicennia marina: anatomical, ultrastructural and biochemical events associated with development from histodifferentiation to maturation. Ann. Bot. 70, 75–86.
9
FarrantJ. M.PammenterN. W.BerjakP.FarnsworthE. J.VertucciC. W. (1996). Presence of dehydrin-like proteins and levels of abscisic acid in recalcitrant (desiccation sensitive) seeds may be related to habitat. Seed Sci. Res. 6, 175–182. 10.1017/S0960258500003238
10
Finch-SavageW. E.ClayH. A.BlakeP. S.BrowningG. (1992). Seed development in the recalcitrant species Quercus robur L.: water status and endogenous abscisic acid levels. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 671–679. 10.1093/jxb/43.5.671
11
Finch-SavageW. E.Leubner-MetzgerG. (2006). Tansley review: seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 171, 501–523. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01787.x
12
Finch-SavageW. E.PramanilS. K.BewleyJ. D. (1994). The expression of dehydrin protein in desiccation sensitive (recalcitrant) seeds of temperate trees. Planta193, 478–485. 10.1007/BF02411551
13
GumilevskayaN. A.AzarkovichM. I. (2010). Identification and characterization of dehydrins in horse chestnut recalcitrant seeds. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 57, 859–864. 10.1134/S1021443710060154
14
HanB.BerjakP.PammenterN.FarrantJ.KermodelA. R. (1997). The recalcitrant plant species, Castanospermum australe and Trichilia dregeana, differ in their ability to produce dehydrin-related polypeptides during seed maturation and in response to ABA or water-deficit-related stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 48, 1717–1726. 10.1093/jxb/48.9.1717
15
HaraM. (2010). The multifunctionality of dehydrins: an overview. Plant Signal. Behav. 5, 503–508. 10.4161/psb.11085
16
HaraM.ShinodaY.KuboM.KashimaD.TakahashiI.KatoT.et al. (2011). Biochemical characterization of the Arabidopsis KS-type dehydrin protein, whose gene expression is constitutively abundant rather than stress dependent. Acta Physiol. Plant. 33, 2103–2116. 10.1007/s11738-011-0749-1
17
HundertmarkM.BuitinkJ.LeprinceO.HinchaD. K. (2011). The reduction of seed-specific dehydrins reduces seed longevity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Seed Sci. Res. 21, 165–173. 10.1017/S0960258511000079
18
JuradoE.FloresJ. (2005). Is seed dormancy under environmental control or bound to plant traits?J. Veg. Sci. 16, 559–564. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02396.x
19
KalembaE. M.PukackaS. (2007). Possible roles of LEA proteins and sHSPs in seed protection: a short review. Biol. Lett. 44, 3–16.
20
KramerD.BreitensteinB.KleinwächterM.SelmarD. (2010). Stress metabolism in green coffee beans (Coffea arabica L.): expression of dehydrins and accumulation of GABA during drying. Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 546–553. 10.1093/pcp/pcq019
21
PanzaV.DistéfanoA. J.CarjuzaaP.LáinezV.del VasM.MaldonadoS. (2007). Detection of dehydrin-like proteins in embryos and endosperm of mature Euterpe edulis seeds. Protoplasma231, 1–5. 10.1007/s00709-007-0248-9
22
RadwanA.HaraM.KleinwächterM.SelmarD. (2014). Dehydrin expression in seeds and maturation drying: a paradigm change. Plant Biol. (Stuttg). 16, 853–855. 10.1111/plb.12228
23
SelmarD.BytofG.KnoppS.-E. (2008). The storage of green coffee (Coffea arabica)–Decrease of viability and changes of potential aroma precursors. Ann. Bot. 101, 31–38. 10.1093/aob/mcm277
24
ŠunderlíkováV.SalajJ.KopeckyD.SalajT.WilhemE.MatusíkováI. (2009). Dehydrin genes and their expression in recalcitrant oak (Quercus robur) embryos. Plant Cell Rep. 28, 1011–1021. 10.1007/s00299-009-0710-6
25
VasevaI. I.AndersI.FellerU. (2014). Identification and expression of different dehydrin subclasses involved in the drought response of Trifolium repens. J. Plant Physiol. 171, 213–224. 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.07.013
Summary
Keywords
dehydrin, maturation drying, orthodox seeds, recalcitrant seeds, drought stress
Citation
Kleinwächter M, Radwan A, Hara M and Selmar D (2014) Dehydrin expression in seeds: an issue of maturation drying. Front. Plant Sci. 5:402. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00402
Received
11 June 2014
Accepted
29 July 2014
Published
27 August 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Juan Francisco Jimenez Bremont, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Cientifica y Tecnológica, Mexico
Reviewed by
Pablo Delgado, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Mexico; Joel Flores, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, A.C., Mexico
Copyright
© 2014 Kleinwächter, Radwan, Hara and Selmar.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: d.selmar@tu-bs.de
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.