ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
BdCESA7, BdCESA8, and BdPMT Utility Promoter Constructs for Targeted Expression to Secondary Cell-Wall-Forming Cells of Grasses
- 1School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA
- 2U.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- 3U.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- 4U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA
- 5Department of Biochemistry, Wisconsin Energy Institute, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Utility vectors with promoters that confer desired spatial and temporal expression patterns are useful tools for studying gene and cellular function and for industrial applications. To target the expression of DNA sequences of interest to cells forming plant secondary cell walls, which generate most of the vegetative biomass, upstream regulatory sequences of the Brachypodium distachyon lignin biosynthetic gene BdPMT and the cellulose synthase genes BdCESA7 and BdCESA8 were isolated and cloned into binary vectors designed for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of monocots. Expression patterns were assessed using the β-glucuronidase gene GUSPlus and X-glucuronide staining. All three promoters showed strong expression levels in stem tissue at the base of internodes where cell wall deposition is most active, in both vascular bundle xylem vessels and tracheids, and in interfascicular tissues, with expression less pronounced in developmentally older tissues. In leaves, BdCESA7 and BdCESA8 promoter-driven expression was strongest in leaf veins, leaf margins, and trichomes; relatively weaker and patchy expression was observed in the epidermis. BdPMT promoter-driven expression was similar to the BdCESA promoters expression patterns, including strong expression in trichomes. The intensity and extent of GUS staining varied considerably between transgenic lines, suggesting that positional effects influenced promoter activity. Introducing the BdPMT and BdCESA8 Open Reading Frames into BdPMT and BdCESA8 utility promoter binary vectors, respectively, and transforming those constructs into Brachypodium pmt and cesa8 loss-of-function mutants resulted in rescue of the corresponding mutant phenotypes. This work therefore validates the functionality of these utility promoter binary vectors for use in Brachypodium and likely other grass species. The identification, in Bdcesa8-1 T-DNA mutant stems, of an 80% reduction in crystalline cellulose levels confirms that the BdCESA8 gene is a secondary-cell-wall-forming cellulose synthase.
Efforts are underway to engineer plant vegetative biomass, such as stems and leaves of grasses, to be more easily deconstructed and converted to liquid biofuels such as ethanol (Carroll and Somerville, 2009). Since secondary cell walls make up most of the vegetative biomass in mature plants, they are the major target for efforts to improve the efficiency of biofuel production. For acidic and alkaline pretreatment-based conversion processes, the highly recalcitrant phenolic polymer lignin poses challenges in that it encapsulates cellulose and perhaps crosslinks to hemicelluloses thereby interfering with their chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis (Chapple et al., 2007; Chen and Dixon, 2007). One approach to improving biomass deconstructability is to engineer genetic changes that alter flux through the lignin biosynthetic pathway, by knocking down or overexpressing key monolignol biosynthetic pathway genes resulting in lower lignin quantity, altered lignin composition, and/or altered cell wall polymer crosslinking (Vanholme et al., 2012; Eudes et al., 2014; Wilkerson et al., 2014).
Another approach to improve plant biomass yields and deconstruction properties is to introduce genetic changes that either increase deposition of secondary cell wall polysaccharides or result in the deposition of less tightly packed (amorphous) polysaccharides. However, when transgenes that alter these traits are expressed in a non-targeted fashion, they can have detrimental effects on plant health. Examples include collapsed xylem elements or stem lodging, developmental abnormalities, or toxicity that negatively affects plant growth and fitness (Yang et al., 2013). The creation of a toolbox of directed gene promoters that drive expression of transgenes in cells involved in secondary cell wall formation would be of benefit to researchers aiming to improve plant biomass properties for biofuels generation while minimizing plant fitness costs.
Bioinformatic resources are now available for Brachypodium distachyon (Brachypodium) that allow its transcriptome to be mined for genes having various expression patterns1 (e.g. Mutwil et al., 2011). Coussens et al. (2012) searched the Brachypodium Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) database2 for genes that were either constitutively expressed across tissues and development, or uniquely expressed in leaf, stem plus leaf sheaths, roots, flowers, and/or callus. They demonstrated that a combined approach of bioinformatic purveyance of all expressed genes and whittling down of promoter candidates based on qRT-PCR analysis, followed by promoter-GUS fusion analyses in planta, was effective in identifying gene promoters with desired expression patterns for a particular transgenic application.
Transcriptome profiling was also employed to determine the tissue expression patterns of the ten-member Brachypodium CELLULOSE SYNTHASE A (CESA) gene family (Handakumbura et al., 2013). CESA4 (Bradi3g28350), CESA7 (Bradi4g30540), and CESA8 (Bradi2g49912) were determined to be expressed at high levels in plant organs known to be active in secondary cell wall biosynthesis. The expression patterns of CESA4 and CESA7 were determined by in situ hybridization to be highest in vascular bundles, surrounding interfascicular fibers, and epidermal cells (Handakumbura et al., 2013). Artificial microRNA knockdown of CESA4 and CESA7 in Brachypodium plants resulted in reduced secondary cell wall thickness and crystalline cellulose amounts, thereby demonstrating that those two genes encode cellulose synthase catalytic subunits involved in synthesizing cellulose deposited in secondary cell walls (Handakumbura et al., 2013).
An elegant example of how targeted tissue-specific gene expression can improve plant biomass as a feedstock for biofuels generation can be found in Yang et al. (2013). In that study, CINNAMATE 4-HYDROXYLASE (C4H) gene activity reintroduced into an Arabidopsis c4h mutant background under the control of the xylem vessel-specific VASCULAR-RELATED NAC-DOMAIN6 (VND6) gene promoter directed normal lignin production to xylem vessels. Cell wall strength was maintained and vessel element collapse avoided, while lignin amounts remained reduced in interfascicular fiber cells, thus allowing for easier extraction of polysaccharide sugars. This example provides evidence that promoter substitution can successfully alter cell wall phenotypes including lignin deposition while avoiding negative growth effects.
Recently, the Populus trichocarpa (poplar) PtrCesA8 promoter was used to drive expression of the R2R3 MYB transcription factor PtrMYB152 in Arabidopsis thaliana resulting in the upregulation of secondary cell wall biosynthetic genes and thicker cell walls (Wang et al., 2014). In a study particularly promising to biofuels applications, the PtrCesA8 promoter was used in poplar to drive expression of the Angelica sinensis FERULOYL MONOLIGNOL TRANSFERASE (AsFMT) gene (Wilkerson et al., 2014). The AsFMT enzyme functions to acylate sinapyl or coniferyl monolignol alcohols with ferulate, producing ferulate-monolignol ester conjugates that were incorporated by radical oxidative coupling into the backbone of the growing lignin polymer. Due to the facility of breaking this ester bond, lignin modified in this way has been termed “zip-lignin”. This technology could lower the cost of biomass pretreatment due to a lesser requirement for high heat or chemical treatments (Wilkerson et al., 2014).
For the present study, the upstream regulatory sequences of the Brachypodium p-COUMAROYL-CoA MONOLIGNOL TRANSFERASE (BdPMT), BdCESA7, and putative BdCESA8 cellulose synthase genes were cloned in order to generate utility promoter cassettes functional in grasses for targeting gene-of-interest expression in secondary-cell-wall-forming cells. These promoters were chosen because the corresponding genes have been implicated in lignin biosynthesis (BdPMT; Petrik et al., 2014) and secondary-cell-wall cellulose biosynthesis (BdCESA7 and BdCESA8; Handakumbura et al., 2013). Brachypodium plants transformed with each of these utility promoter vector constructs, into which the GUSPlus reporter gene was introduced, displayed GUS staining patterns that would be expected for promoters involved in secondary cell wall formation. In addition, functionality of the utility promoter cassettes was validated by rescuing the mutant phenotypes of the previously reported Bdpmt-1 loss-of-function mutant (Petrik et al., 2014) and a newly identified Bdcesa8-1 T-DNA mutant by transforming into those mutants the BdPMT and BdCESA8 coding sequences inserted into the BdPMT and BdCESA8 promoter constructs, respectively. These utility promoter vectors should have utility not only in Brachypodium but also in other monocots including cereals and dedicated bioenergy crop grasses.
Materials and Methods
The monocot transformation vector pIPKb001 (Himmelbach et al., 2007) was the backbone vector sequence for constructing the utility promoter vectors (maps shown in Supplementary Figures S1–S3) and subsequent GUSPlus (Cambia Labs) expression vectors. Initially, the Zea mays UBIQUITIN1 intron (ZmUbi1IN) was PCR-amplified from the pStarling shuttle vector (Gubler et al., 2008) using ZmUbiIN1AscI_F and ZmUbiIN1HindIII_R primers and ligated into the AscI and HindIII restriction sites of the multiple cloning site (MCS) of pIPKb001. Next, BdPMT (Bradi2g36910), BdCESA7 (Bradi4g30540), or BdCESA8 (Bradi2g49912) promoter sequences were PCR-amplified from Brachypodium inbred line Bd21-3 genomic DNA, using primer pairs BdPMTproSwaI_F and BdPMTproAscI_R, BdCESA7proSwaI_F and BdCESA7proAscI_R, or BdCESA8proStuI_F and BdCESA8proAscI_R, respectively. PCR products were digested with either SwaI and AscI (BdPMT and BdCESA7) or StuI and AscI (BdCESA8), and ligated into the corresponding MCS sites in pIPKb001 upstream of the ZmUbi1IN. The 3,000 nt BdPMT promoter fragment consisted of sequence from (–) 3044 to (–) 45 relative to the translational start site of BdPMT, Bd2:37,332,132-37,335,133 reverse from the Brachypodium distachyon v2.1 genomic sequence database3 (Phytozome v10.3). Similarly, the 2,385 nt BdCESA7 promoter fragment consisted of sequence from (–) 2385 to (–) 1 relative to the translational start site of BdCESA7 (Bd4:36,373,412-36,375,796), and the 1,888 nt BdCESA8 promoter fragment spanned sequence from (–) 1888 to (–) 1 relative to the translational start site of BdCESA8 (Bd2:49,946,427-49,948,277). Sequence analysis found that the Bd21-3-derived BdCESA8 promoter sequences had minor sequence differences compared to the Joint Genome Initiative (JGI)-generated Bd21 reference genome sequences.
To generate the GUS reporter gene constructs, GUSPlus was PCR-amplified from the pGPro8 vector (Genbank accession JN593327.1) using the primers GUSPLUS_BamHI_F and GUSPLUS_XhoI_R, cloned into the BamHI and XhoI sites of pENTR2B, then inserted into the utility promoter vectors using Gateway-cloning technology.
The BdPMTprom::BdPMT ORF phenotypic rescue construct was generated by PCR-amplifying the BdPMT (Bradi2g36910) Open Reading Frames (ORF) from Brachypodium inbred line Bd21-3 first-strand cDNA using the primer pair BdPMTBamHI_F and BdPMTSpeIXhoI_R, restriction digesting the PCR product with BamHI and XhoI and ligating into pENTR2B, then Gateway-cloning into the BdPMT utility promoter vector described above.
The BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF phenotypic rescue construct (map shown in Supplementary Figure S11) was generated by PCR-amplifying the BdCESA8 (Bradi2g49912) ORF from first-strand cDNA using the primer pair BdCESA8SalI_F and BdCESA8XhoI_R, restriction digesting the PCR product with SalI and XhoI and ligating into pENTR2B, then Gateway-cloning into the BdCESA8 utility promoter vector. The BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF cassette (composed of the BdCESA8 promoter fragment, ZmUbi1IN, Gateway attB1 and attB2 recombination sites flanking the BdCESA8 ORF, and the NOS terminator) was then released by SfiI restriction enzyme digestion and ligated into the custom-made B258 p9ioACT vector carrying a paromomycin selection cassette4 (DNA Cloning Service).
PCR primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1. All inserts were verified by sequencing. Vector sequences have been deposited into Genbank (accession numbers KT948986, KT948987, and KT962835 for the BdPMT, BdCESA7, and BdCESA8 utility promoter vectors, respectively).
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Transformation
Plants harboring the BdPMTprom::GUSPlus, BdCESA7prom::GUSPlus, or BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus constructs were regenerated from Bd21-3 embryonic callus by Agrobacterium strain AGL-1 mediated transformation (Vogel and Hill, 2008) using media supplemented with 40 U/mL hygromycin B (Phytotechnology Laboratories). Similarly, plants harboring the BdPMTprom::BdPMT ORF rescue construct were regenerated from Bdpmt-1 (Petrik et al., 2014) embryonic callus on media supplemented with hygromycin as above. Plants harboring the BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF rescue construct were regenerated from callus originating from embryos dissected from heterozygous BdCESA8 / BdcesA8-1 plants (homozygous BdcesA8-1 plants could not be used because they were sterile). The Agrobacterium-transformed callus was cultured on media supplemented with 120 mg/L paromomycin (PhytoTechnology Laboratories). The BdcesA8-1 mutant is a T-DNA line, JJ18282, harboring a T-DNA insertion in the 9th exon of Bradi2g49912. JJ18282 was obtained from the WRRC Brachypodium distachyon T-DNA collection (Bragg et al., 2012) that is now housed at the DOE Joint Genome Institute5 Primers used for genotyping are listed in Supplementary Table S1 and their relative locations shown in Figure 7C.
Seed Sterilization and Plant Growth
Transgenic seeds were surface-sterilized and plated on selective agar supplemented with either 40 U/mL hygromycin B (Phytotech Labs) or 120 mg/L paromomycin, stratified for 3 days at 4°C in the dark, then moved to a 22°C growth chamber under 16 h light for 5–7 days. Seedlings were transplanted to a 50:50 mix of SunGro Rediearth and MetroMix 510 soil in 10 cm pots, and allowed to grow and senesce in a growth chamber under a 20 h light:4 h dark photoperiod at 22°C and 50% humidity. Control plants were either wild-type inbred line Bd21-3 seedlings plated on non-selective plates or planted directly into soil, or hygromycin-selected plants harboring a Zea mays UBIQUITIN1 (ZmUbi1) promoter with intron (ZmUbi1IN) driving GUSPlus (Cambia Labs) in pWBVec8 (Wang et al., 1998).
Tissue Collection and GUS Staining
For leaf expression analyses, 2 cm distal sections were taken from the top two leaves of plants 23 and 37 days after planting (DAP). For stem expression analyses, transverse hand cut sections were taken at the median of every internode, except for the apical internode that was sectioned within the basal 2 cm, at 23 or 37 DAP. Floral structures were obtained just before anthesis when neighboring distal florets were undergoing seed fill. Root tips from seedlings germinated on plates were excised for root expression analyses.
The expression pattern for each promoter in leaves, stems, and flower structures was determined by colorimetric GUS staining by immersion in 0.1 M NaPO4 pH 7.0/10 mM EDTA pH 8.0/0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100/2 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-1H-indol-3-yl β-D-glucopyranosiduronic acid (X-Gluc) dissolved in N,N-dimethyl formamide (Jefferson, 1987). Roots were stained similarly, with the addition of 10 mM ascorbic acid to prevent browning. Samples were incubated overnight at either 25°C (flowers) or 37°C (leaves, stems, and roots). Additionally, tissues isolated from lines with the highest expression levels were also stained in the presence of potassium 1 mM each ferri- and ferrocyanide. Post-staining, leaves were cleared in 70% ethanol, and all samples were rinsed in water before imaging using brightfield microscopy.
p-Coumaric Acid and Crystalline Cellulose Quantitation
The p-coumarate content of ball-milled, extractive-free stem plus leaf sheath cell wall material from senesced plants was determined by alkaline hydrolysis to release p-coumaric acid (pCA) that was quantitated by Gas Chromotography and Flame Ionization Detection (GC-FID) as described in Ralph et al. (1994).
The crystalline cellulose content of ball-milled, extracted, and destarched stem plus leaf sheath alcohol-insoluble residue (AIR) cell wall material from senesced stems plus leaf sheaths was determined by sulfuric acid hydrolysis as described previously (Selvendran and O’Neill, 1987; Foster et al., 2010). The resulting monosaccharide (glucose) was quantitated using a colorimetric anthrone assay.
Generation of the BdPMT, BdCESA7, and BdCESA8 Utility Promoter Vectors
Previously we showed that the Brachypodium BdPMT gene catalyzes the formation of monolignol p-coumarate (ML-pCA) ester conjugates that become polymerized into lignin within secondary cell walls (Petrik et al., 2014). Therefore, we reasoned that the promoter and cis-acting regulatory sequences of the BdPMT gene would be useful for driving the expression of gene knockdown constructs or genes of interest, with spatial and temporal patterns associated with lignin deposition. In addition, utility promoters from CESA genes of dicot species have proven useful for targeting expression to cells producing cellulose in their secondary cell walls (Wang et al., 2014; Wilkerson et al., 2014), so we set out to generate equivalent secondary-cell-wall-associated CESA utility promoters that would be fully functional in grasses.
In order to clone BdPMT, BdCESA7, and BdCESA8 DNA fragments containing each gene’s 5′ untranslated region (UTR), promoter, and upstream regulatory sequences (hereafter referred to as promoter fragments), Brachypodium inbred line Bd21-3 genomic DNA was used as a template along with sequence-specific primers (Supplementary Table S1) to PCR-amplify a 3,000 bp fragment located upstream of the BdPMT (Bradi2g36910) gene translational start site as well as 2,385 and 1,888 bp fragments located immediately upstream of the BdCESA7 (Bradi4g30540) and BdCESA8 (Bradi2g49912) genes’ translational start sites, respectively. The promoter fragments were then cloned, by restriction digestion and ligation, into the pIPKb001 monocot binary vector (Himmelbach et al., 2007) immediately upstream of a maize UBIQUITIN1 intron (ZmUbi1IN) that was inserted into unique AscI/HindIII restriction sites within the vector’s multiple cloning site (Supplementary Figures S1–S3). The ZmUbi1IN was introduced because it has been reported that an intron fused to the 5′ end of gene-of-interest coding sequences improved exogenous gene expression in monocot species (Mascarenhas et al., 1990; Plesse et al., 2001; Sivamani and Qu, 2006; Mann et al., 2011).
These assembled constructs are the so-called utility promoter vectors, the maps of which are shown in Supplementary Figures S1–S3. The corresponding DNA sequences can be found in Genbank (Accession numbers KT948986, KT948987, and KT962835). Each of the vectors contains unique SfiI restriction sites located immediately upstream of each promoter and immediately downstream of the NOPALINE SYNTHASE (NOS) translational terminator sequences (NOS terminator). As such, each so-called promoter cassette, which is composed of the promoter fragment, ZmUbi1IN, Gateway attR1 and attR2 recombination sites flanking the chloramphenicol resistance (CmR) and ccdB genes, and the NOS terminator, can be released by Sfi1 restriction enzyme digestion and moved to, e.g., another binary vector harboring a plant selectable marker other than the HYGROMYCIN PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE (HPT) gene present in these utility promoter vectors. This, in fact, was done as part of our effort to rescue the Bdcesa8-1 T-DNA insertional mutant phenotypes (described below); the BdCESA8 promoter cassette, composed of the BdCESA8 promoter fragment, ZmUbi1IN, Gateway attB1 and attB2 recombination sites flanking the BdCESA8 ORF, and the NOS terminator, was moved into the B258 p9ioACT vector containing the NEOMYCIN PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE II (NPTII) gene, given that the HPT gene was already present in Bdcesa8-1 plants within the T-DNA insertion disrupting the BdCESA8 gene.
In order to assess the gene expression patterns that these promoter cassettes could drive in planta, the GUSPlus reporter gene was Gateway-cloned into the attR1 and attR2 recombination sites of the three utility promoter vectors, thereby replacing the CmR and ccdB genes. Each construct was then transformed into Brachypodium embryo-derived callus using Agrobacterium tumefaciens followed by regeneration of T0-generation transgenic plants on hygromycin selection media. Four independent T0-generation BdPMTprom::GUSPlus plants were generated along with 20 and 33 independent T0-generation BdCESA7 and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus plants, respectively.
The BdPMTprom::GUSPlus Expression Pattern was Comparable to the Phloroglucinol Staining Pattern of Lignin
T1- and T2-generation plants from four independent transgenic lines harboring the BdPMTprom::GUSPlus construct were analyzed for X-Glucuronide (GUS) staining in seedlings and plants at different developmental stages (Figures 1–5; Supplementary Figures S4–S6, S9, S10). In 37-day-old adult plant stems, GUS staining was observed in sections taken from all internodes, with staining being strongest in the developmentally younger internodes at the top of the culm (Figure 1). Within an internode, staining was strongest at the base where tissues are developmentally the youngest and are actively forming secondary cell walls (Figure 2A). In sections from the internode base, GUS staining was strongest in vascular bundles, particularly in the xylem vessels and tracheids, as well as in interfascicular tissues, which contain sclerenchyma cells. Strong GUS staining was also visible in epidermal cells including in microhair trichomes, with indigo product extending into the chlorenchyma and sclerenchyma cells comprising the cortex (Figure 2A). The reader is referred to Matos et al. (2013) for illustrations showing the locations of different cell and tissue types in Brachypodium stem sections.
FIGURE 1. GUS-stained Brachypodium distachyon stem cross sections from 37-day-old plants transformed with the BdPMT (first column), BdCESA7 (second column), and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus (third column) constructs. Wild type (WT) control sections are shown in the fourth column. Sections for a given line were from the same culm. All sections were stained the same duration so as to show relative expression levels. Pictured on the left is a culm with its internodes (I) labeled along with the locations from which each section was taken. B = base and M = middle of internode. Scale bar for sections = 170 μm.
FIGURE 2. GUS- and phloroglucinol-stained stem cross sections from 37-day-old plants. (A,B) BdPMTprom::GUSPlus sections from the base (A) and top (B) of the apical internode. (C) Stem section from the top of an apical internode stained with phloroglucinol to visualize lignin (red coloration). (D–F) BdCESA7prom::GUSPlus sections from the base (D), middle (E), and top (F) of the apical internode. Sections for a given line were from the same internode. All sections were GUS-stained the same duration so as to show relative expression levels. Note that some of blue color in the pith may be from diffusion of the colorimetric product. E = Epidermis; C = Cortex; VB = Vascular Bundle; S = Sclerenchyma; P = Parenchyma. Scale bar = 50 μm.
FIGURE 3. GUS-stained leaf snippets from 37-day-old plants. (A) BdPMTprom::GUSPlus. (B) BdCESA7prom::GUSPlus. (C) BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus. (D) ZmUBQprom::GUSPlus. (E) Wild type. (F,G) Close-up views of GUS-stained BdPMTprom::GUSPlus leaves. ph = prickle hair. Tm = trichome macrohair; bm = bicellular microhair. Scale bars in A–F = 1 mm. Scale bar in G = 30 μm.
FIGURE 4. GUS-stained roots from 3-day-old seedlings. (A,F) BdPMTprom::GUSPlus. (B,G) BdCESA7prom::GUSPlus. (C,H) BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus. (D) ZmUBQprom::GUSPlus. (E) Wild type. Scale bar = 1 mm for A–E, 0.5 mm for F–H.
FIGURE 5. GUS-stained florets and internal floral organs prior to seed fill. (A,E) BdPMTprom::GUSPlus. (B,F) BdCESA7prom::GUSPlus. (C,G) BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus. (D,H) Wild type. Shown in (A–D) are the palea (left) and lemma (right). Shown in (E–H) are the pistil and anthers. Scale bars = 1 mm.
In stem sections taken from the middle and top of internodes, BdPMTprom::GUSPlus-derived GUS staining was most noticeable in interfascicular tissue cells, being much weaker compared to that observed in sections taken from the base (Figures 2A,B). These differences in relative intensities of expression were expected, given that the youngest and developmentally most active tissue is found at the base of internodes near the intercalary meristems (Esau, 1965). In strongly expressing lines, short incubation times or addition of ferri- and ferrocyanide resulted in patterns similar to those of weakly expressing lines. Potassium ferri- and ferrocyanide reduces colorimetric product diffusion (Vitha et al., 1995).
Stem-section GUS staining patterns correlated with where lignin was detected using phloroglucinol staining (Figure 2C). It is worth noting that phloroglucinol staining depicts how much lignin has accumulated over time whereas GUS staining depicts gene expression at that particular moment of stem development.
The tissues of 23-day-old plants were also analyzed for BdPMTprom::GUSPlus associated GUS staining. The culms of plants at this juvenile age typically contained only one internode. GUS staining of sections throughout that internode was visible in the xylem vessels and tracheids (Supplementary Figures S5A–C), being similar to that observed in the apical internodes of 37-day-old plants (Figure 2A). Only occasionally was staining observed in sclerenchyma cells in the ring surrounding the vascular bundles and in the epidermal cell layer of the stem.
In 23-day-old BdPMTprom::GUSPlus plant stems as well as when using short X-Gluc solution incubation times on 37-day-old stem sections, indigo coloring was weak or not visible in cells constituting the phloem or in xylem parenchyma cells even though staining was clearly visible in xylem vessels and tracheids, suggesting that BdPMT promoter activity was relatively weaker in those cell types (Supplementary Figures S5B,C).
In BdPMTprom::GUSPlus T1- and T2-generation plants’ leaves, production of colorimetric product was strongest in major leaf veins, at the leaf margins, and in the leaf tip (Figures 3A,F,G; Supplementary Figure S6). Strong staining was also apparent in trichome macrohairs, whereas lighter staining occurred in developing and mature bicellular microhairs and in prickle hair cells at the leaf margin (Figures 3F,G; Supplementary Figure S6). Information on the anatomy and developmental control of trichome macrohair, bicellular microhair, and prickle hair cell formation in maize leaves can be found in Moose et al. (2004). BdPMT expression in these trichome subtypes was not unexpected given that lignification has been documented in the walls of Arabidopsis trichomes (Marks et al., 2008). BdPMT promoter-driven GUS expression was generally not detected or was weak in non-trichome epidermal cells except at the leaf margin and in the guard cells of stomata, where staining was prominent (Figures 3F,G).
GUSPlus expression driven by the BdPMT promoter was also assayed in 3-day-old roots of seedlings that had been germinated on selective agar growth media in vertically oriented plates. In seedlings from all four transgenic lines, GUS staining was visible in the vasculature and weakly in the root cap (Figures 4A,F; Supplementary Figures S9A–D). In the strongest expressing lines (Supplementary Figures S9B,C), staining was obvious in the root hairs. More work must be done to determine if root hair staining represents legitimate expression of the BdPMT gene or is instead an artifact related to transgene insertion site positional effects. Overall, staining was stronger in developmentally older tissues proximal to the seedling shoot compared to younger tissues closer to the root tip. This suggests that BdPMT promoter-driven expression of GUSPlus begins in developmentally young cells and continues into the mature zone. The above-described distinct staining patterns observed in the various plant organs differed from the uniform and ubiquitous staining patterns observed throughout plants transgenic for ZmUBIQUITIN1prom (ZmUBI1prom)::GUSPlus (Figures 3D and 4D).
Microscopic examination of developing florets removed from the spikelets of 37-day-old plants and stained overnight with X-Gluc revealed strong GUS staining in the lemma, often to the degree that indigo precipitate became deposited in the solution between trichomes (Figure 5). Lesser staining was observed in the palea. The lemma and palea were carefully dissected away, and the internal floral organs removed and photographed. In these tissues, BdPMTprom::GUSPlus-related GUS staining was visible at the base of the ovary, in the feathery stigma, and lightly in pollen grains (Figure 5E; Supplementary Figures S10A,B).
BdCESA7 and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus Expression Patterns were Indistinguishable from Each Other, but Varied Between Independent Lines
Eight independent lines each of BdCESA7 and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus T1 and T2-generation plants were analyzed for GUS staining in various tissues at different developmental stages (Figures 1–5; Supplementary Figures S4, S5, and S7–S10). Overall, the GUS staining patterns observed in plants harboring the BdCESA7 promoter construct were indistinguishable from those of the BdCESA8 promoter construct when comparing the same tissues at the same developmental stages. However, GUS staining patterns and intensities looked considerably different from line to line (Supplementary Figures S4 and S7–S9).
In stem sections of flowering plants, GUS staining was consistently observed from line to line in xylem vessels and tracheids of vascular bundle cells, in interfascicular tissue sclerenchyma cells, and in epidermal cells (Figures 1 and 2); Supplementary Figures S4 and S5). By contrast, GUS staining of cells in the cortex and in parenchyma cells was highly variable. In the strongest expressing BdCESA7 and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus lines, GUS staining in cortex cells in the youngest stem internodes was nearly as dark as that observed in vascular bundle cells, with dark staining extending throughout the entire stem sections including in the sclerenchyma and parenchyma cells (Figures 1 and 2C,D). Staining in bundle sheath cells and in phloem and xylary parenchyma cells, while visible in the strongest expressing lines, was faint or not visible in moderately and weakly expressing lines. This result is in line with the relatively weak signal detected in these tissues by in situ hybridization using a BdCESA7 antisense probe, as reported in Handakumbura et al. (2013).
As with BdPMTprom::GUSPlus stem sections, BdCESA7 and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus-related GUS staining was strongest at the base of each internode where tissues were developmentally the youngest and were actively forming secondary cell walls (Figures 1 and 2D–F). Overall, staining appeared more ubiquitous in BdCESA7 and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus stem sections in comparison to that observed in BdPMTprom::GUSPlus plants’ stem sections of the same ages grown side by side. It cannot be ruled out, however, that if a larger number of BdPMTprom::GUSPlus independent transgenic lines were generated and analyzed, some might stain with comparably high intensity, given the observed large variability in expression levels likely caused by transgene chromosomal insertion site positional effects.
As with the stem sections, obvious line-to-line differences in the intensities of staining were observed in leaves of T1-generation BdCESA7 and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus plants (Supplementary Figures S7 and S8). In all lines, GUS staining was detected in leaf veins, macrohair trichomes, and microhair trichomes (Figures 3B,C). In moderately expressing lines, GUS staining was patchy in leaf epidermal cells, whereas it was dark and uniform in highly expressing lines (Supplementary Figures S7 and S8). By contrast, uniform staining was consistently observed in cells of ZmUBIprom::GUSPlus leaves from multiple lines (Figure 3D). GUSPlus expression driven by the BdCESA7 and BdCESA8 promoters was also assayed in 3 day-old roots, revealing GUS staining patterns similar to those observed in BdPMTprom::GUSPlus roots (Figure 4; Supplementary Figure S9). Equivalent GUS staining associated with the three different constructs was also observed in floral organs (Figure 5; Supplementary Figure S10).
A BdPMTprom::BdPMT ORF Construct Rescued the Bdpmt-1 Mutant Phenotype
To validate that the BdPMT utility promoter vector was fully functional, and that the observed BdPMTprom::GUSPlus related GUS staining pattern likely reflected the expression pattern of the BdPMT gene, the BdPMT ORF was Gateway-cloned into the BdPMT utility promoter binary vector then transformed into the Bdpmt-1 knockout mutant previously described in Petrik et al. (2014). A mild alkaline hydrolysis assay was performed on senesced stem tissue from 15 independent T0-generation Bdpmt-1 BdPMTprom::BdPMT ORF plants in order to determine if the construct rescued the reduced cell wall pCA phenotype. In Bdpmt-1 mutant senesced stems, cell wall pCA levels were measured to be about 35% that of WT stems (Figure 6). Senesced stems from the 15 Bdpmt-1 BdPMTprom::BdPMT ORF independent transformants were found to contain a range of cell wall pCA (Figure 6). Two of the transformants had pCA levels higher than that of WT, whereas pCA content in seven transformants was intermediate between WT and the Bdpmt-1 mutant stems. pCA content in the remaining six transformants were statistically indistinguishable from that in the Bdpmt-1 mutant stems. These results suggest that the BdPMTprom::BdPMT ORF construct is functional, but that chromosome insertion site effects greatly affected expression levels such that most lines did not have full rescue of the Bdpmt-1 mutant phenotype.
FIGURE 6. Quantification of p-coumaric acid (pCA) released by 2 M NaOH from senesced stems of the following plants: Bdpmt-1; T0-generation Bdpmt-1 harboring BdPMTprom::BdPMT ORF (15 independent events grouped into three statistically different groups where light orange = <50% rescue, dark orange (50—75% rescue, and brown (100% or greater rescue). Means for different groups are shown in color-coded boxes. Letters represent statistically different groups. Bars represent standard errors of three technical replicates.
A Bdcesa8 T-DNA Insertional Mutant Exhibited Substantially Reduced Crystalline Cellulose and Stunted Culms that Could be Rescued by a BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF Construct
To validate that the BdCESA8 promoter fragment contained the regulatory sequences necessary and sufficient to drive expression of the BdCESA8 ORF to rescue the phenotype of a Bdcesa8 mutant, we first had to identify a Bdcesa8 mutant and confirm it had a phenotype consistent with BdCESA8 involvement in secondary cell wall cellulose deposition. A query of the Brachypodium mutant collection database identified, a T-DNA line, JJ18282, with an insertion in the 9th exon of the 13-exon BdCESA8 (Bradi2g49912) (Figure 7). PCR primers were designed to score the presence or absence of the T-DNA so as to identify homozygous and heterozygous plants (Figures 7C,D; Supplementary Table S1). Homozygous Bdcesa8-1 plants were found to exhibit stunted culm growth (Figure 7A; Supplementary Figures S12A) along with a sterile phenotype and spikelets with awns that became distorted upon maturation (Supplementary Figure S12B). Crystalline cellulose levels in homozygous Bdcesa8-1 senesced stems were 16 to 26% that of WT stems (Figure 7B; Supplementary Figure S12C). Given that culm growth and cellulose content of heterozygous BdCESA8/Bdcesa8-1 plants were indistinguishable from WT, the Bdcesa8-1 mutation is considered to be recessive.
FIGURE 7. Transgenic rescue of the Bdcesa8-1 stunted culm growth and reduced cellulose phenotypes. (A) T1-generation homozygous Bdcesa8-1 plants harboring the BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF construct (left pot) exhibit culm growth comparable to WT plants (center pot). Right pot contains a homozygous Bdcesa8-1 plant transformed with the empty vector (no rescue). (B) Crystalline cellulose content of senesced stems from the following plants: Bdcesa8-1; Bdcesa8-1 containing the empty vector (Bdcesa8 EV); Bdcesa8-1 containing BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF; Wild type. Bars represent standard errors, three technical replicates. Different letters represent statistical differences. (C) Diagram of the BdCESA8 gene Bd2g49912 drawn to scale. Bars and lines represent exons and introns, respectively. Shown is the location of the T-DNA insertion (triangle) in the Bdcesa8-1 mutant line JJ18282 along with relative primer locations (arrows). RB and LB represent T-DNA right border and left border. (D) Agarose gel-electrophoresed PCR products, scoring for the presence of the Bdcesa8-1 T-DNA (lanes 1, 4, 8, 11; primers Bdcesa8-1_T-DNA_LB_T1 (T1) + BdCESA8_EXON11_R2 (R2), 756 bp product) or the absence of the T-DNA (lanes 2, 5, 9, 12; primers BdCESA8_INTRON7_F1 (F1) + BdCESA8_EXON10_R1 (R1), 627 bp product) as well as the presence or absence of the BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF rescue construct (lanes 3, 6, 10, 13; primers BdCESA8_EXON13_F + NOST_R, 408 bp product). Rescue 1 and 2 are two independent Bdcesa8-1 plants transformed with BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF (plants shown in A). Lane 7 is the Fermentas GeneRuler 100 bp ladder (cat #SM0241).
Since the T-DNA insertion present in the Bdcesa8-1 mutant harbored the HPT selectable marker gene, the BdCESA8 utility promoter binary vector could not be employed to test rescue of the Bdcesa8-1 mutant phenotype given that it also contained the HPT gene. Therefore, the BdCESA8 promoter cassette containing the BdCESA8 ORF was cloned into the B258 p9ioACT binary vector, which employs the NPTII selectable marker (Supplementary Figure S11), and introduced into Bdcesa8-1 plants. Nine T0-generation plants homozygous for Bdcesa8-1 and harboring independent insertions of the BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF construct were identified and confirmed by PCR (Figure 7D). Of those plants, seven had culm growth similar to that of WT along with partial to full seed set (Figure 7A). Analysis of crystalline cellulose content in senesced stems from four of the independent transformants, that all had normal culm height, revealed that one transformant had cellulose content indistinguishable from that of WT whereas the other three transformants had cellulose contents intermediate between those of homozygous Bdcesa8-1 plants and WT (Figure 7B). Therefore, as observed with the BdPMTprom::BdPMT ORF-containing Bdpmt-1 plants, only a fraction of the BdCESA8prom::BdCESA8 ORF-containing Bdcesa8-1 plants exhibited full phenotypic rescue.
In this study, we showed that Brachypodium plants stably transformed with either the BdPMTprom::GUSPlus, BdCESA7prom::GUSPlus, or BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus construct exhibited GUS staining patterns that would be expected for genes involved in secondary cell wall biosynthesis. The functionality of the BdPMT and BdCESA8 utility promoter binary vectors were validated by demonstrating that they could drive expression of the BdPMT ORF and BdCESA8 ORF to rescue the Bdpmt-1 and Bdcesa8-1 mutant phenotypes, respectively. The Bdcesa8-1 T-DNA insertional mutant that we identified exhibited stunted culm growth and drastically reduced crystalline cellulose levels in stem tissues, which is consistent with BdCESA8 functioning as a cellulose synthase involved in secondary cell wall deposition.
Given that the expression patterns of the BdCESA7 and BdCESA8 promoters were indistinguishable, this combination of promoters will have utility in applications where two different genes are to be expressed with identical spatiotemporal patterns. Gene silencing can occur when the same promoter is used to drive expression of more than one gene (Park et al., 1996). The use of these two promoters should circumvent such an effect, given that the promoters share minimal DNA sequence identity.
Previously we determined that the Brachypodium PMT gene encodes a BAHD (BEAT, AHCT, HCBT, and DAT) acyltransferase that specifically acylates monolignols with p-coumarate (pCA) thereby producing monolignol pCA (ML-pCA) conjugates incorporated into lignin in secondary-cell-wall-forming tissues (Withers et al., 2012; Petrik et al., 2014). As such, the BdPMT promoter construct should have utility in driving gene-of-interest expression spatially and temporally in cells involved in lignin deposition.
Handakumbura et al. (2013) showed that the BdCESA4 (Bradi3g28350) and BdCESA7 (Bradi4g30540) genes are involved in cellulose biosynthesis in secondary cell wall-forming tissues of Brachypodium. In addition, they found that BdCESA8 (Bradi2g49912) exhibited an expression pattern equivalent to BdCESA4 and BdCESA7, suggesting that they may function together. In other plant species including Oryza sativa (rice), three CESA genes function together and non-redundantly in secondary cell wall cellulose biosynthesis (Tanaka et al., 2003; Hill et al., 2014). BdCESA8 is the closest Brachypodium homolog to the secondary-cell-wall-forming rice OsCESA4 cellulose synthase (Tanaka et al., 2003; see phylogenetic tree in Handakumbura et al., 2013). Moreover, Valdivia et al. (2013) found that BdCESA8 was strongly upregulated when the NAC transcription factor BdSWN5, which controls secondary cell wall biosynthesis, was overexpressed in Brachypodium.
The observed Bdcesa8-1 phenotypes including the reduced fertility phenotype are equivalent to those associated with loss-of function mutations in the rice secondary-cell-wall-forming OsCESA4, OsCESA7, and OsCESA9 genes (Tanaka et al., 2003). Handakumbura et al. (2013) reported similar phenotypes in Brachypodium lines targeted for reduced BdCESA4 or BdCESA7 expression using artificial microRNAs, although those reported phenotypes were not as strong as observed in our Bdcesa8-1 T-DNA insertional mutant, which is likely a null, presumably because the microRNAs conferred only partial loss of function.
Our results, taken together with the above-noted data, strongly suggest that BdCESA8 is involved in the synthesis of cellulose in secondary cell walls. Loss of function of a primary cell wall cellulose synthase would not explain the greater than 80% reduction in Bdcesa8-1 crystalline cellulose levels in senesced stem tissue, which is a tissue type that is mostly composed of secondary cell wall material. Moreover, we did not observe Bdcesa8-1 mutant phenotypes that would be expected for a cellulose synthase involved in primary cell wall biosynthesis, which include severe cell expansion defects in embryos and seedlings (Beeckman et al., 2002; Persson et al., 2007).
Histochemical assessment of Brachypodium plants transgenic for the BdPMT, BdCESA7, and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus constructs showed expression predominantly in xylem vessels, tracheids, and interfascicular fiber cells in stem sections as well as in vasculature of leaves and roots (Figures 1–4). Although expression patterns were similar between independent transgenic plants for each promoter tested, the strength of expression varied considerably between the transgenic lines (Supplementary Figures S8–S12). For example, of the eight independent BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus lines, one line had a high GUS expression level, four lines had medium GUS expression, and three lines had low GUS expression levels (Supplementary Figure S8). These differences were likely due, at least in part, to the effects of cis- and trans-regulatory elements in the surrounding native genomic DNA proximal to the integrated T-DNA insertion sites (Xue et al., 2005; Ziemienowicz, 2010). Differences in transgene copy number could also underlie the expression level differences. In that regard, the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method used in this study can result in more than one T-DNA insertion per plant line (1.5 insertions on average; Bragg et al., 2012).
Gene expression differences between transgenic lines may be desirable in instances where complete loss of function or too-high overexpression causes severe phenotypes or lethality. Efforts to mediate transgene expression variation across transgenic lines have included flanking the transgene with scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MARs; Breyne et al., 1992; Xue et al., 2005). However, although S/MAR inclusion often increased transgene expression levels overall, variation across transgenic lines were reported to still occur (Nowak et al., 2001).
BdPMT, BdCESA7, and BdCESA8prom::GUSPlus-derived GUS staining was also observed in floral tissues at the base of the ovary, in the feathery style, and within pollen grains (Figure 5; Supplementary Figure S10). This finding could indicate that the BdCESA7 and BdCESA8 genes are involved in cellulose biosynthesis within floral organs and within pollen grain walls (Ferguson et al., 1998), which is consistent with the fact that loss of BdCESA8 function resulted in sterility. BdPMT expression in pollen may be related to biosynthesis of phenolics deposited in the intine of the pollen grain (Quilichini et al., 2015). Grienenberger et al. (2009) demonstrated that a BAHD acyltransferase distantly related to BdPMT was responsible for hydroxycinnamoyl spermidine biosynthesis in the tapetum layer of the Arabidopsis thaliana anther, with the synthesized compounds becoming deposited in the pollen grain exine. It is worth noting that no pollen viability phenotype was observed in the Bdpmt-1 null mutant.
Although vascular-specific promoters have been isolated from and effectively used in dicot plant species (see Introduction), dicot-derived promoters do not always work efficiently in monocot species (Schledzewski and Mendel, 1994). To date, only a few grass-species-derived vascular-specific promoters have been cloned and characterized. These include promoters of the rice OsHOX1, OsSWN, and OsCESA9 genes. The OsHOX1 promoter fragment conferred vascular-specific GUS expression that was modulated by sucrose and auxin (Scarpella et al., 2000). It’s expression pattern differed from those characterized in this study in that it was more specific to the vasculature. Vascular-specific GUS expression was also observed for the OsSWN2 promoter fragment (Yoshida et al., 2013). By contrast, the OsSWN1 promoter fragment conferred GUS expression in rice stem sections more similar to that observed in this study, with GUS staining observed in several layers of sclerenchymatous cells beneath the epidermis as well as in the vasculature (Yoshida et al., 2013).
The OsCESA9 promoter fragment also drove GUS expression in rice culms differently from that reported here for the BdCESA7 and BdCESA8 promoter fragments. OsCESA9 and BdCESA7 are orthologs. Kotake et al. (2011) observed OsCESA9prom::GUS staining only in the vasculature and not in sclerenchymatous cells as one would expect, given in situ hybridization data (Li et al., 2003; Handakumbura et al., 2013) and the fact that mutations in OsCESA9 result in reduced cell wall thickness in sclerenchymatous cells (Kotake et al., 2011). It may be that the OsCESA9 promoter fragment was missing important regulatory elements or that chromosomal insertion site positional effects influenced the expression pattern of the construct.
It is anticipated that the utility promoter binary vector constructs characterized in this study could be used to drive gene-of-interest expression in secondary-cell-wall-forming tissues of various grass species such as switchgrass, wheat, rice, or maize, given that other monocot promoter sequences have been shown to be functional in related species, including Brachypodium-derived promoters in maize (Coussens et al., 2012; Thilmony et al., 2014). These utility vectors should hold value in application in model species such as Brachypodium distachyon as well as in monocot crops of commercial interest.
DP, JV, JR, and JS conceived of the experiments and interpreted data. DP, CC, SK, CF, and DP carried out experiments and analyzed data. DP, CC, and JS wrote the manuscript. All authors edited and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by the Department of Energy’s Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research, Office of Science grant no. DE–FC02–07ER64494).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank Jochen Kumlehn for providing the pIPKb001 vector and Roger Thilmony for providing the pGPro8 vector. We thank Richard Sibout for providing seeds of the Bdpmt-1 mutant and Mandy Hsia for help with primers to track the Bdcesa8-1 T-DNA.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.00055
Beeckman, T., Przemeck, G. K., Stamatiou, G., Lau, R., Terryn, N., De Rycke, R., et al. (2002). Genetic complexity of cellulose synthase a gene function in Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. 130, 1883–1893. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.010603
Bragg, J., Wu, J., Gordon, S., Guttman, M., Thilmony, R., Lazo, G., et al. (2012). Generation and characterization of the Western Regional Research Center Brachypodium T-DNA insertional mutant collection. PLoS ONE 7:e41916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041916
Breyne, P., van Montagu, M., Depicker, N., and Gheysen, G. (1992). Characterization of a plant scaffold attachment region in a DNA fragment that normalizes transgene expression in tobacco. Plant Cell 4, 463–471. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.4.463
Coussens, G., Aesaert, S., Verelst, W., Demeulenaere, M., De Buck, S., Njuguna, E., et al. (2012). Brachypodium distachyon promoters as efficient building blocks for transgenic research in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 4263–4273. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers113
Ferguson, C., Teeri, T. T., Siika, A. M., Read, S. M., and Bacic, A. (1998). Location of cellulose and callose in pollen tubes and grains of Nicotiana tabacum. Planta 206, 452–460. doi: 10.1007/s004250050421
Grienenberger, E., Besseau, S., Geoffroy, P., Debayle, D., Heintz, D., Lapierre, C., et al. (2009). A BAHD acyltransferase is expressed in the tapetum of Arabidopsis anthers and is involved in the synthesis of hydroxycinnamoyl spermidines. Plant J. 58, 246–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03773.x
Gubler, F., Hughes, T., Waterhouse, P., and Jacobsen, J. (2008). Regulation of dormancy in barley by blue light and after-ripening: effects on abscisic acid and gibberellin metabolism. Plant Physiol. 147, 886–896. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.115469
Handakumbura, P. P., Matos, D. A., Osmont, K. S., Harrington, M. J., Heo, K., Kafle, K., et al. (2013). Perturbation of Brachypodium distachyon CELLULOSE SYNTHASE A4 or 7 results in abnormal cell walls. BMC Plant Biol. 13:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-131
Hill, J. L. Jr., Hammudi, M. B., and Tien, M. (2014). The Arabidopsis cellulose synthase complex: a proposed hexamer of CESA trimers in an equimolar stoichiometry. Plant Cell 26, 4834–4842. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.131193
Himmelbach, A., A., Zierold, U., Hensel, G., Riechen, J., Douchkov, D., Schweizer, P., et al. (2007). A set of modular binary vectors for transformation of cereals. Plant Physiol. 145, 1192–1200. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.111575
Kotake, T., Aohara, T., Hirano, K., Sato, A., Kaneko, Y., Tsumuraya, Y., et al. (2011). Rice Brittle culm 6 encodes a dominant-negative form of CesA protein that perturbs cellulose synthesis in secondary cell walls. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 2053–2062. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq395
Li, Y., Qian, Q., Zhou, Y., Yan, M., Sun, L., Zhang, M., et al. (2003). BRITTLE CULM1, which encodes a COBRA-like protein, affects the mechanical properties of rice plants. Plant Cell 15, 2020–2031. doi: 10.1105/tpc.011775
Mann, D. G. J., King, Z. R., Liu, W., Joyce, B. L., Percifield, R. J., Hawkins, J. S., et al. (2011). Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) polyubiquitin gene (PvUbi1 and PvUbi2) promoters for use in plant transformation. BMC Biotechnol. 11:74. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-11-74
Marks, M. D., Betancur, L., Gilding, E., Chen, F., Bauer, S., Wenger, J. P., et al. (2008). A new method for isolating large quantities of Arabidopsis trichomes for transcriptome, cell wall and other types of analyses. Plant J. 56, 483–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03611.x
Matos, D. A., Whitney, I. P., Harrington, M. J., and Hazen, S. P. (2013). Cell walls and the developmental anatomy of the Brachypodium distachyon stem internode. PLoS ONE 8:e80640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080640
Moose, S. P., Lauter, N., and Carlson, S. R. (2004). The maize macrohairless 1 locus specifically promotes leaf blade macrohair initiation and responds to factors regulating leaf identity. Genetics 166, 1451–1461. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1451
Mutwil, M., Klie, S., Tohge, T., Giorgi, F. M., Wilkins, O., Campbell, M. M., et al. (2011). PlaNet: combined sequence and expression comparisons across plant networks derived from seven species. Plant Cell 23, 895–910. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.083667
Park, Y. D., Papp, I., Moscone, E. A., Iglesias, V. A., Vaucheret, H., Matzke, A. J., et al. (1996). Gene silencing mediated by promoter homology occurs at the level of transcription and results in meiotically heritable alterations in methylation and gene activity. Plant J. 9, 183–194. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.09020183.x
Persson, S., Paredez, A., Carroll, A., Palsdottir, H., Doblin, M., Poindexter, P., et al. (2007). Genetic evidence for three unique components in primary cell-wall cellulose synthase complexes in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 15566–15571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706592104
Petrik, D. L., Karlen, S. D., Cass, C. L., Padmakshan, D., Lu, F., Liu, S., et al. (2014). p-Coumaroyl-CoA monolignol transferase (PMT) acts specifically in the lignin biosynthetic pathway in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant J. 77, 713–726. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12420
Plesse, B., Criqui, M. C., Durr, A., Parmentier, Y., Fleck, J., and Genschik, P. (2001). Effects of the polyubiquitin gene Ubi.U4 leader intron and first ubiquitin monomer on reporter gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol. Biol. 45, 655–667. doi: 10.1023/A:1010671405594
Quilichini, T. D., Grienenberger, E., and Douglas, C. J. (2015). The biosynthesis, composition and assembly of the outer pollen wall: a tough case to crack. Phytochemistry 113, 170–182. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.05.002
Ralph, J., Hatfield, R. D., Quideau, S., Helm, R. F., Grabber, J. H., and Jung, H.-J. G. (1994). Pathway of p-coumaric acid incorporation into maize lignin as revealed by NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 9448–9456. doi: 10.1021/ja00100a006
Schledzewski, K., and Mendel, R. R. (1994). Quantitative transient gene expression: comparison of the promoters for maize polyubiquitin1, rice actin1, maize-derived Emu and CaMV 35S in cells of barley, maize and tobacco. Trans. Res. 3, 249–255. doi: 10.1007/BF02336778
Tanaka, K., Murata, K., Yamazaki, M., Onosato, K., Miyao, A., and Hirochika, H. (2003). Three distinct rice cellulose synthase catalytic subunit genes required for cellulose synthesis in the secondary wall. Plant Physiol. 133, 73–83. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.022442
Thilmony, R., Guttman, M. E., Lin, J. W., and Blechl, A. E. (2014). The wheat HMW-glutenin 1Dy10 gene promoter controls endosperm expression in Brachypodium distachyon. GM Crops Food. 5, 36–43. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.27371
Valdivia, E. R., Herrera, M. T., Gianzo, C., Fidalgo, J., Revilla, G., Zarra, I., et al. (2013). Regulation of secondary wall synthesis and cell death by NAC transcription factors in the monocot Brachypodium distachyon. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 1333–1343. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers394
Vanholme, R., Morreel, K., Darrah, C., Oyarce, P., Grabber, J. H., Ralph, J., et al. (2012). Metabolic engineering of novel lignin in biomass crops. New Phytol. 196, 978–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04337.x
Vitha, S., Beneš, K., Phillips, J. P., and Gartland, K. M. A. (1995). “Histochemical GUS analysis,” in Agrobacterium Protocols, eds K. M. A. Gartland and M. R. Davey (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), 185–193. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-302-3:185
Wang, M., Li, Z., Matthews, P. R., Upadhyaya, N. M., and Waterhouse, P. M. (1998). Improved vectors for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of monocot plants. Acta Hortic. 461, 401–408. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.461.46
Wang, S., Li, E., Porth, I., Chen, J. G., Mansfield, S. D., and Douglas, C. J. (2014). Regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis by poplar R2R3 MYB transcription factor PtrMYB152 in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 4:5054. doi: 10.1038/srep05054
Wilkerson, C. G., Mansfield, S. D., Lu, F., Withers, S., Park, J. Y., Karlen, S. D., et al. (2014). Monolignol ferulate transferase introduces chemically labile linkages into the lignin backbone. Science 344, 90–93. doi: 10.1126/science.1250161
Withers, S., Lu, F., Kim, H., Zhu, Y., Ralph, J., and Wilkerson, C. G. (2012). Identification of grass-specific enzyme that acylates monolignols with p-coumarate. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 8347–8355. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.284497
Xue, H., Yang, Y. T., Wu, C. A., Yang, G. D., Zhang, M. M., and Zheng, C. C. (2005). TM2, a novel strong matrix attachment region isolated from tobacco, increases transgene expression in transgenic rice calli and plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110, 620–627. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1880-9
Yoshida, K., Sakamoto, S., Kawai, T., Kobayashi, Y., Sato, K., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2013). Engineering the Oryza sativa cell wall with rice NAC transcription factors regulating secondary wall formation. Front. Plant Sci. 4:383. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00383
Keywords: binary vectors, Brachypodium, cellulose, lignin, monocot, p-coumarate, tissue-specific expression
Citation: Petrik DL, Cass CL, Padmakshan D, Foster CE, Vogel JP, Karlen SD, Ralph J and Sedbrook JC (2016) BdCESA7, BdCESA8, and BdPMT Utility Promoter Constructs for Targeted Expression to Secondary Cell-Wall-Forming Cells of Grasses. Front. Plant Sci. 7:55. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00055
Received: 07 November 2015; Accepted: 14 January 2016;
Published: 04 February 2016.
Edited by:Samuel P. Hazen, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
Reviewed by:Monika Doblin, University of Melbourne, Australia
Javier Sampedro, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Copyright © 2016 Petrik, Cass, Padmakshan, Foster, Vogel, Karlen, Ralph and Sedbrook. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: John C. Sedbrook, firstname.lastname@example.org