Original Research ARTICLE
Genome Wide SSR High Density Genetic Map Construction from an Interspecific Cross of Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium tomentosum
- 1State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China
- 2Plant Breeding and Genetics Division, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology, Faisalabad, Pakistan
- 3Cotton Sciences Research Institute of Hunan/National Hybrid Cotton Research Promotion Center, Changde, China
- 4National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan
A high density genetic map was constructed using F2 population derived from an interspecific cross of G. hirsutum × G. tomentosum. The map consisted of 3093 marker loci distributed across all the 26 chromosomes and covered 4365.3 cM of cotton genome with an average inter-marker distance of 1.48 cM. The maximum length of chromosome was 218.38 cM and the minimum was 122.09 cM with an average length of 167.90 cM. A sub-genome covers more genetic distance (2189.01 cM) with an average inter loci distance of 1.53 cM than D sub-genome which covers a length of 2176.29 cM with an average distance of 1.43 cM. There were 716 distorted loci in the map accounting for 23.14% and most distorted loci were distributed on D sub-genome (25.06%), which were more than on A sub-genome (21.23%). In our map 49 segregation hotspots (SDR) were distributed across the genome with more on D sub-genome as compared to A genome. Two post-polyploidization reciprocal translocations of “A2/A3 and A4/A5” were suggested by seven pairs of duplicate loci. The map constructed through these studies is one of the three densest genetic maps in cotton however; this is the first dense genome wide SSR interspecific genetic map between G. hirsutum and G. tomentosum.
The cotton genus Gossypium consists of 50 species (Fryxell, 1992; Stewart, 1995; Ma et al., 2008), five are allotetraploid found in the New World with 26 pair of chromosomes (2n = 4x = 52; 13 A− and 13 D−) while 45 belongs to Old World with 13 pair of chromosomes (2n = 2x = 26); (Stewart, 1995; Brubaker et al., 1999a; Zhang et al., 2005). Evolution and diversity studies of genus Gossypium provide the basic knowledge of morphological diversity of the genus and plant biology which can help in the better utilization of genetic resources (Wendel et al., 2009).
The new advances in the molecular biology provide new approaches like genomics to construct molecular map of important traits that will divulge the genetic architecture of the traits and help in marker assisted selection (MAS) for speedy cotton improvement. The use of DNA markers in MAS can unleash the avenue toward robust crop improvement (Burr et al., 1983; Tanksley et al., 1988; Xu and Crouch, 2008) especially complex traits like fiber quality (Kohel et al., 2001) through the indirect selection of target traits.
More than 30 genetic maps have already been published in cotton; most of them are based on interspecific crosses of domesticated tetraploid species namely G. hirsutum and G. barbadense (S1 Table; Jiang et al., 1998; Zhang et al., 2002; Lacape et al., 2003, 2009; Nguyen et al., 2004; Rong et al., 2004; Guo et al., 2007; He et al., 2007). The interspecific tetraploid genetic maps are useful in understanding genome structure and exploring the genetics basis of important agronomic characters and also provide the basis for finding new DNA markers for further high density maps (Guo et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2011).
In cotton, first detailed genetic linkage map, using RFLP molecular markers, was published by Reinisch et al. (1994). The map was constructed from interspecific cross of G. hirsutum and G. barbadense using 57 F2 populations. In total 705 loci in 41 linkage groups covered the 4675 cM of cotton genome map. However, 14 linkage groups were assigned to chromosome numbers using aneuploid lines. It was also estimated that genetic distance of 1 cM of cotton genome corresponding to ~400 kb genomic DNA. In 2004, Rong et al. further refined this map using a large number of RFLP markers along with some SSR markers, the number of loci increased to 2584 covering 4448 cM. However, the extensive use of RFLP markers was not become popular, because of their limitations.
In 2002, 58 DHs were used to construct the first PCR-based molecular marker map (Zhang et al., 2002). Later on, the strain “Vsg” (G. barbadense) used as semigamy line to produce 73 DHs and backcross populations (140) were developed from G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, these two populations were used to construct two genetic maps and they were compared (Song et al., 2005). Since DH lines were relatively small, and very difficult to develop, so backcross populations have played the key role in the construction of genetic maps. In 2004, Han et al. constructed the map comprising 624 loci using BC populations and later on in 2006 they further include more loci up to 907 in the map to enhance its density 907 (Han et al., 2006), in the year 2007 and 2008 Guo et al. enriched twice the density of the map from 1790 to 2247 cM. Zhao et al. (2012) further augmented the density of the Guo et al. (2008) map to 3414 covering 3668 cM of cotton genome, which is currently the world's largest and most dense genetic map of cotton. There are almost 10 different kinds of markers used for linkage, nine of them are molecular markers and the only one is morphological markers. Among molecular markers, SSRs are the largest mapped molecular markers and account for 2734 SSR loci, covering 80% of the entire marker used till to-date (Zhao et al., 2012).
Another genetic map included 2316 loci covering 4419 cM is the world's second SSR markers dense genetic map (Yu et al., 2011). In addition, Yu and other published a cotton genetic map in 2012 using the 186 RILs derived from G. hirsutum (TM-1) and G. barbadense (3–79) that is also very representative of 2072 marker loci including 1825 SSR loci, but they are the first who use SNP markers in cotton genomics. So far published major cotton interspecific genetic maps are shown in S1 Table. Almost all cotton genetic maps are based on the G. hirsutum; G. barbadense and hybrids of wild populations.
The occurrence of segregation distortion in plants is universal, a process in which genotypic frequencies are skewed from the expected violating Mendelian segregation ratios and these deviations can't be evaluated by simple genetic methods (Lu et al., 2002; Song et al., 2005; Li et al., 2010). Segregation distortion is widespread in intra and interspecific crosses (Causse et al., 1994; Ulloa et al., 2002; Rong et al., 2004; Lacape et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2012), and is a driving force in the evolution of species (Taylor and Ingvarsson, 2003). Mangelsdorf and Jones (1926) reported for the first time the occurrence of segregation in maize, using morphological markers and afterward McCouch et al. (1988) and Pereira et al. (1994) reported segregation skewness in rice, sorghum, and tomato, respectively. Many factors like pollen tube competition, pollen killer genes, selective fertilization, abortion, chromosome translocation etc. are the major causes of segregation distortion (Luo and Xu, 2003; Taylor and Ingvarsson, 2003; Li et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2007).
In this study, high density genetic map of cotton is developed from G. hirsutum × G. tomentosum which will serve as an indispensable genomic resource for fine positioning of important traits, genome organization and function, map-based gene cloning, comparative genomic analyses in cotton. The MAS studies unveil that upland cotton has narrow genetic base resulting into low rate of polymorphism among them (Wendel et al., 1992; Van Esbroeck et al., 1998; Gutierrez et al., 2002; Saha et al., 2003). For the efficient utilization of genetic resources from wild cotton molecular breeding approaches need to be established. This requires better understanding at genomic level which is the key feature. It is therefore a dire need to construct high-density genetic linkage map between upland cotton and tomentosum.
Out of total primers used, 7411 (42.94%) were genomic SSR (gSSRs) and 9848 (57.06%) were EST-SSR (Table 1). In total 3091 SSRs were polymorphic between parents with an average of 17.91%, of which 20.64% (1530) were gSSRs and produced 1516 loci whereas 1561 were eSSR with polymorphism rate of 15.85% generating 1628 loci. BNL series has the highest polymorphism rate (41.69%) followed by MGHES with a polymorphism rate of 40.48% generating 169 and 36 loci, respectively. Among the eSSR primers MON_CER series has second highest polymorphism rate (27.27%) ensuing MGHES (40.48%). In case of gSSR primers the second highest polymorphism rate (32.32%) was of gNBRI. However, NAU generated the maximum number of loci (667) followed by HAU and Mon_CGR engendering 483 and 355 number of loci, respectively. Over all the polymorphism rate of genomic SSR primers was greater than EST-SSR primers in this study (Table 1).
In total 3091 polymorphic SSR primers were used to scrutinize for genotyping 188 F2 population that produced 3144 marker loci (Table 1). Figure 1 reveals the results of 8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) of NAU2235 primer, clearly showing that the primer produced the amplicons having two stable bands with different segregating pattern positions. These were denoted as NAU2235(a) and NAU2235(b) with higher and lower molecular weights, respectively. Of the 3144 marker loci, 522 loci accounting for 16.60% of the total were dominant while 83.40% (2622) were co-dominant (Table 1). From these 522 dominant loci 227 (43.45%) and 295 (56.51%) loci received alleles from CIR 12-2 and G. tomentosum, respectively. Of the total 1516 eSSR, 1224 loci (82.06%) were codominant while 272 (17.94%) were dominant loci. In case of the total 1628 gSSR, 1378 (84.64%) and 250 (15.36%) were co-dominant and dominant loci, respectively. It was observed that gSSR revealed more number of co-dominant loci than eSSR. Out of total 3144 polymorphic loci 48.22% were eSSR and 51.78% were gSSR.
Figure 1. Electrophoresis pattern of NAU2235 in F2 population 1–3 are CRI 12-2, F1 and G. tomentosum, others are F2 individuals.
Genetic Map Features
In this study we used JoinMap 4.0 (Stam, 1993) mapping software for linkage analysis of 3144 polymorphic loci data (Table 2). The genetic linkage map comprises 3093 SSR marker loci that were mapped to the 26 chromosomes of cotton using 2823 SSR primers. The 51 loci did not make any linkage group and were not mapped because of missing data and highly skewed segregation. Of these markers 1354 were eSSR pairs wherein 1235 pairs amplified single loci, 111 pairs generated two loci each (222), five pair amplified three loci each (15), three pairs amplified quadruplicate loci each (12), all together the eSSR primers produced 1484 polymorphic loci that were mapped on the 26 chromosomes. The 1469 gSSR pairs of primers amplified 1609 marker loci mapped of which 1338 pairs were single locus, 123 pairs amplified two loci producing 246 marker loci, seven pairs amplified three loci (Guo et al., 2007), and only one amplified four loci. Out of 1484 eSSR loci, 691 were distributed in At genome, and 793 were distributed in Dt genome; while of the 1609 gSSR marker loci, 798 and 811 were located in At and Dt genomes, respectively (Table 2). Of the 3093 mapped loci, 2580 were co-dominant loci, with 1245 and 1335 distributed on At and Dt genomes, respectively, whereas 513 were dominant loci of which 225 loci received alleles from CRI 12-2 and 288 from G. tomentosum.
All the mapped loci spanned 4365.30 cM with an average inter-marker distance of 1.48 cM (Table 2, Figure 2). The average length of chromosome in this map is 167.90 cM, containing an average number of 118.96 loci. Among At and Dt sub-genomes the chromosome Chr.19(D05) is the longest chromosome spanning 218.38 cM, with highest number of loci (215) on a chromosome; while shortest chromosome is Chr.17 (D03) covering a distance of 122.09 cM, containing 81 loci. On the other hand Chr.04 (A04) contains the minimum number of loci that is only 65 spanning a distance of 137.73 cM. The largest inter-marker distance is 2.47 cM on Chr.22 (D04) and the minimum is 1.02 cM on Chr.19 (D05) which is also the densest chromosome in terms of number of loci. The minimum marker interval is 0 cM and the biggest inter-loci gap is 16.3 cM on Chr.22 (D04); in total there are 29 gaps >10 cM with 20 and 9 gaps distributed on At and Dt sub-genomes, respectively.
Figure 2. The interspecific genetic map of the F2 population (CRI12-2 × G. tomentosum). Genetic linkage map of allotetraploid cotton presented as 13 each At and Dt sub-genome homeologous chromosomes. The names of loci are shown on the right, and the positions of the loci are shown, in Kosambi centiMorgan (cM), on the left. The newly developed primer's name are underlined and blue in color whereas, markers showing segregation distortion are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, *****P < 0.0005, ******P < 0.0001, *******P < 0.00005). The already anchored markers loci by other scientists are bold and red in color. For NBRI original names please see S2 Table.
The At sub-genome embraces 1489 loci covering a total genetic distance of 2189.01 cM with an average marker interval of 1.53 cM having largest and smallest interval of 2.12 and 1.09 cM, respectively. The longest chromosome, as far as recombination frequency is concerned, is Chr.11(A11) which covers 208.77 cM with 192 loci followed by Chr.01(A01) that spans 208.76 cM with 158 marker loci. There are 20 gaps >10 cM and largest gap of 15.96 cM is on Chr.01(A01) in the At sub-genome.
The Dt sub-genome comprises of 1604 loci which span a genetic distance of 2176.29 cM with an average marker interval of 1.43 cM having largest and smallest interval of 2.47 and 1.02 cM, respectively. The longest chromosome, as far as recombination frequency is concerned, is Chr.19 (D05) as mentioned before followed by Chr.21 (D11) that spans 209.59 cM with 147 marker loci. There are nine gaps >10 cM and largest gap in the Dt sub-genome is 16.3 cM on Chr.22(D04).
SSRs markers are not equally distributed among At and Dt sub-genomes with more gSSRs and eSSRs on the Dt sub-genome as inferred from above results. The more gSSRs are distributed on Chr.11(A11), Chr.19(D05), Chr.21(D11), Chr.25(D06), Chr.05(A05), and Chr.24(D08) while more eSSRs are distributed on Chr.19(D05), Chr.11(A11), Chr.05(A05), Chr.24(D08), Chr.14(D02), Chr.15(D01), and Chr.21(D11). The distribution of gSSRs and eSSRs on each chromosome is also differential. The gSSR and eSSR are almost equally distributed on Chr.18(D13), Chr.12(A12), Chr.04(A04), Chr.11(A11), Chr.24(D08), Chr.07(A07), and Chr.23(D09) with a difference of <3% however their distribution is not same on Chr.01(A01) and Chr.06(A06) with maximum differences of 24 and 18%, respectively (Figure 2).
Characteristics of Distorted Segregation Markers
Altogether 716 revealed skewness from normal Mendelian ratio called segregation distortion accounting for 23.14% distortion of the total mapped loci. Of the total 716 loci, 67 loci segregate toward the CIR 12-2 allele and 580 loci toward the heterozygous allele. According to the type of SSR i.e., 22.64% gSSR and 23.62% eSSR are distorted. These distorted loci are not evenly distributed on the 26 cotton chromosomes ranging from 4 to 62% on each chromosome. Dt sub-genome has more distorted loci, 393 or about 25.06%, than the At sub-genome which consisted of 323 (21.23%) distorted loci. Most of the segregation distortion loci are clustered on specific chromosomal segments i.e., segregation distortion region, SDR, as referred by Yu et al. (2011) and Zhao et al. (2012). A total of 49 SDRs were found of which six tend toward maternal parent CRI 12-2, two favor male parent G. tomentosum, and the remaining 41 segregate toward heterozygotes. Of the total SDRs 18 are on the At sub-genome and 31 on the Dt sub-genome. The chromosomes with the most distorted loci were Chr.11(A11), Chr.22(D04), Chr.19(D05), and Chr.21(D11). The distorted loci showed a phenomenon in which loci skewing toward the same allele appeared on the same chromosomes or within the same SDRs e.g., Chr.02(A02), Chr.03(A03), Chr.13(A13), Chr.14(D02), Chr.17(D03), and Chr.18(D13; Figure 2). SDR22_6, SDR25_26, SDR26_25, SDR33_20, SDR42_12, and SDR47_18 are the biggest SDRs and they all showed distortion toward the heterozygote (Figure 3). In this study, ~40% of SDRs are concentrated toward the end of the linkage group while ~30% of the SDR are located in the centromeric region. The smallest proportion of distorted loci is on Chr.10(A10) with 3.96%, and the largest proportion i.e., 49.6% on Chr.12(A12). But it is interesting that chromosomes; Chr.12(A12), Chr.25(D06), and Chr.06(A06) have the distortion ratios 49.6, 47.58, and 45.56%, respectively, which is far greater than distortion ratio on other chromosomes and the entire genome has higher segregation ratio (23.14%) than other maps (Table 2).
Duplication, Rearrangement, and Translocation
In our map, 250 SSR primer pairs amplified two or more loci and collectively produced 520 multiple loci, with 468 duplicated, 36 triplicated, and 16 quadruplicated loci (Table 3 and S3 Table). Of these, 238 (50.85%) duplicated loci bridged the 13 homeologous At/Dt chromosomes. The remaining 230 duplicated loci were present between non-homeologous chromosomes and also have intra-chromosomal relationship i.e., within the same sub-genome. Of the 230 loci 44.34% loci were located on the same chromosome while 55.65% loci were present on different chromosomes (non-homeologous). This result revealed that during the evolutionary process multiple rounds of duplication both intra-chromosomal and inter-chromosomal occurred (Zhao et al., 2012). An intra-chromosomal duplications observed in chromosome 11 (A11), where five markers viz. HAU0367, HAU0512, MGHES-8, MGHES-8, MON_DPL0522, and TMB0628 each divulged duplicate loci and their recombination rates on an average are 10 cM.
Moreover, two post-polyploidization reciprocal translocations of A2/A3 and A4/A5 were suggested by seven pairs of duplicate loci in the At sub-genome with two pairs of duplicated loci were identified between A3 and D2 chromosomes, three pairs on A2 and D3, one pair of duplicate loci on each A5/D4 and A4/D5. The marker HAU2794 produced duplicate loci between Chr.01(A01) and Chr.02(A02), from which we can deduce a probable dividing line for the reciprocal translocation in these two At sub-genome chromosomes. However, it needs more dense mapping data in the vicinity of HAU2794 (S1 Table).
Choice of Parental Material
It will be easier for us to dig up enough quantity of polymorphic primers if parents differ for one or more traits of interest. Secondly, high purity in parental materials is required to avoid impure residual heterozygosity which would lead to confusing population genotyping, resulting into difficult to determine linkage groups (Cloutier et al., 1995). Thirdly, hybrid offspring fertility must be considered, because higher rate of infertility not only hinder the production of appropriate segregating populations like F2 but may increase rate of segregation distortion.
In this study Upland cotton CRI 12-2 was used as female parent and one of the tetraploid wild cotton namely G. tomentosum as male parent. We selected the CRI 12-2 due to its verticillium disease resistance, high yield with superior fiber quality, wider adaptability and medium early maturing habit.
The main reason to select G. tomentosum wild cotton is to utilize the desirable exotic genes for the improvement of upland cotton and to enrich the germplasm. The MAS studies unveil that upland cotton has narrow genetic base resulting into low rate of polymorphism among them (Wendel et al., 1992; Van Esbroeck et al., 1998; Gutierrez et al., 2002; Saha et al., 2003). It has many unique agronomic traits that need to be introgressed into the upland cotton for developing superior cultivars.
For the efficient utilization of genetic resources from wild cotton molecular breeding approaches need to be established. This requires better understanding at genomic level and for economical utilization of desirable genes from tomentosum. It is therefore a dire need to construct high-density genetic linkage map between upland cotton and tomentosum.
Highly dense maps offer the means to look across the whole genome for skewed loci (Causse et al., 1994; Harushima et al., 1996). However; it impinges on the development of genetic map and QTL detection (Zhu et al., 2007). In this study, out of 3093 mapped loci, 716 loci revealed the phenomenon of segregation distortion accounting for 23.14% which is significantly higher than Yu et al. (2011) and Zhao et al. (2012). One reason may be because these researchers used upland cotton and barbadense while we used tomentosum as second parent which is genetically more apart from upland resulting into more translocations, chromosomal rearrangements and other genomic structure variations leading to high segregation distortion. Studies have shown that wider genetic relationship would lead to increasing trends of segregation distortion (Kianian and Quiros, 1992). The other reason may be that different types of populations were used in these studies. In the present study F2 population was used, which has more segregation ratio and produce more classes of segregates than BC1, while they used BC1population. This study revealed that distorted markers are distributed on almost each chromosome, but are unevenly distributed in the various regions of chromosomes. Of the 716 skewed loci 323 mapped in At sub-genome and 393 in Dt sub-genome indicating that Dt subgenome has more segregation distortion than At subgenome. The reason may be that Gossypium raimondii is the putative contributor of the Dt sub-genome to Gossypium hirsutum. Wang et al. (2012) found that approximately 40% of the paralogous genes were present in more than one block, which suggests that this genome has undergone substantial chromosome rearrangement during its evolution. Segregation distortion is potential signatures of introgression segments in G. hirsutum mapping population. Therefore, these chromosomal aberrations may be one of the possible reasons for more distortion in Dt sub-genome than At sub-genome. Nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions may be the other reason as mention by Jiang C. X. et al. (2000). Other maps have also proved that Dt sub-genome showed more distortion (Yu et al., 2011). Most of the distorted loci skewed toward heterozygous alleles which are in concurrence with Zhao et al. (2012). Of all the distorted loci, 52.5% of the loci are located within the SDR. A total of 49 SDR are located across the genome with more on D sub-genome, and within one SDR all the distorted loci segregate in the same direction as reported by Yu et al. (2011). All large SDRs showed distortion toward the heterozygous allele as pointed out by Zhao et al. (2012). These SDRs provide the evidence for the presence of genetic loci which may be one of the causes of such distorted loci. These loci express at different times to trigger gametophyte and zygotic selection. In rice gametocidal gene has now been identified and mapped on the genome. In cotton the presence of such gametophyte gene need to be verified.
High Density Genetic Map
High density genetic maps are not only to unveil the genome structure and origin of evolution but are also gaining importance in the applied genetic and genomic research. In particular gene rich high density genetic maps would open horizon for genome sequencing, tagging agronomically important genes, QTL mapping, map based cloning and MAS. Low polymorphic rate within the upland cottons would restrain the development of high density cotton genetic map as the genome required huge number of marker to cover it fully (Park et al., 2005; Han et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; He et al., 2007). In lieu of this fact new gSSRs from G. raimondii were developed to cover more genome and construct high density map. In this study 51 loci could not be placed on the map because of missing data or presence of stutter bands due to DNA slippage during PCR complicating the interpretation of bands. Due to stumble bands heterozygotes perplexed with homozygotes leading to the cynicism in the estimate of heterozygosity. However, this can be subdued by adding genotypes of known band size. The high density cotton map was assembled based on the 3093 SSR mapped markers covering 4365.30 cM with an average inter-marker distance of 1.48 cM. In this study gSSR revealed more polymorphism than eSSR like many other studies including those of Han et al. (2006), Nguyen et al. (2004), and Reddy et al. (2001). Compared to already constructed dense genetic maps of Rong et al. (2004) including 2584 mapped markers loci at 1.72 cM interval covering 4447.9 cM; Guo et al. (2008) comprised of 2247 loci covering 3440.4 cM with an average inter loci distance of 1.58 cM; Yu et al. (2011) consisting of 2316 marker loci at 1.91 cM interval with map length of 4418.9 cM; Yu et al. (2012) having 2072 marker loci covering 3380 cM at an average distance of 1.63 cM between markers and Zhao et al. (2012) including 3414 mapped loci spanning 3667.62 cM with average inter loci distance of 1.08 cM., our map ranked second after Zhao et al. (2012) as far as total mapped loci are concerned but stands first in terms of mapped SSR loci (3093). In the present map Chr.19(D05) has the most loci while Chr.04(A04) contains the least marker hence the distribution of markers on chromosomes is similar to Yu et al. (2011) and Yu et al. (2012). More marker loci were distributed on the D sub-genome than on the A sub-genome in this map which is in conformity with the results of Guo et al. (2007); Yu et al. (2011), and Yu et al. (2012), while Rong et al. (2004) reported conversely. The A sub-genome covers longer distance (2189.01 cM) than the D sub-genome (2176.29 cM) in this study and the previous reports of Rong et al. (2004); Yu et al. (2011) and Yu et al. (2012) but Guo et al. (2007) revealed shorter A sub-genome. In the present high density map the average inter-marker distance of D sub-genome (1.43 cM) is lesser than A sub-genome (1.53 cM) which is in concurrence with the results of all three maps mentioned above. The number of gaps >10 cM in A sub-genome is higher than D sub-genome in this map like Yu et al., , but its reverse in case of Yu et al. (2011). Both gSSRs and eSSRs are distributed more in D sub-genome than A sub-genome, and Chr.19(D05) and Chr.11(A11) are the highest gSSR and eSSR containing chromosomes which is in agreement with Yu et al. (2011). Moreover, their distribution across the 26 chromosomes is also varied. This phenomenon of uneven dissemination of SSRs on both the sub-genomes and chromosomes may offer to ascertain SSR repeat motif distribution in the genome and eSSR sequences could be advantageous in the mapped based cloning and MAS. The SSRs designed in the present study from G. raimondii (D genome cotton) mostly (88.24%) mapped on D sub-genome which may help to study the evolution of tetraploid cotton e.g., 50% of the newly raimondii-derived SSR distributed on Chr.20(D10), Chr.14(D02) which indicates that these chromosomes may endure rigorous evolution.
Zhao et al. (2012) increased the Guo et al. (2008) map from 2247 to 3414 marker loci with enhancement of 1167 loci, which include 541 new loci on the A sub-genome and 626 new loci on the D sub-genome, however they increased map length of only 127.2 cM, and Rong et al. (2004) enhanced the marker loci in the Reinisch et al. (1994) map from 705 to 2584 but the covered map length decreased from 4675 to 4447.9 cM.
Mostly high density cotton genetic maps have been developed from interspecific crosses of upland and barbadense but in the present study wild cotton G. tomentosum was used in order to understand the genome structure, organization and evolution which will offer the basis of genome comparison leading to enrich the presently available cotton germplasm by incorporating superior genes especially disease resistance from wild genetic resources.
Materials and Methods
There should be no specific permissions were required for conducting experiments at National Wild Cotton long-term in vivo nursery, Sanya because this nursery was especially established by Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China as experimental field for research purposes on wild cotton. It is further confirm that the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.
F1 hybrid was generated from an interspecific cross of G. hirsutum L var. CRI 12-2 (as female parent) and G. tomentosum, P0601211 (as male parent). By selfing of F1, 2022 F2 individuals were generated and sown in the field at National Wild Cotton long-term in vivo nursery, Sanya, China. From these 2022 F2 individuals only 188 immortalized plants were randomly selected to construct F2 population for the development of high density genetic map. In order to keep these selected plants as immortalized every autumn aboveground plant parts were cut off. Genomic DNA of parents, F1 and F2 population of 188 individuals was extracted from young leaf tissue, by CTAB DNA extraction procedure, as described by Zhang and Stewart (2000) with some modifications. PCR amplification was done on TAKARA Bio Inc. TP 600 thermal cycler and silver staining following the method described by Zhang et al. (2002).
In total 17,259 pairs of SSR primers were analyzed to identify polymorphic markers between CRI 12-2 and Gossypium tomentosum (P0601211). Whereas, ICRC series of primers were independently designed primers in our laboratory using G. raimondii genome sequences obtained from scaffolds (data not presented here), the all other SSR primers form Cotton Marker Database (CMD; http://www.cottonmarker.org/) published on the primer (Table 4).
Marker Data Acquisition/Genotyping
SSR data collections were performed manually for gel-based assays. Polymorphic markers were used to survey F2 mapping population. According to parents and F1-based authentication primers were identified as dominant or co-dominant. All co-dominant markers were scored using the Mendelian segregation ratio 1:2:1 and all the dominant markers were scored using the 3:1 Mendelian segregation ratio. SSR amplicons were encoded as “10” (only one upper band), “11” (two bands), and “01” (only one lower band) and vice versa. For dominant loci, “1” was scored for presence, and “0” for absence. In both cases, “−” was recorded as missing data which included the blurred or vague bands. If a marker formed multiple bands within the same gel but with different molecular weight, it means marker is segregating for multiple loci that marker is known as multi-allelic marker. Besides the main bands if the markers produced other stable bands with different segregation pattern from the main bands (multi-allelic marker), they were named separately by primer name followed by the letters (a), (b), (c), (d) as a suffix for differentiating between them.
JoinMap 4.0 was used in this study. Kosambi mapping function was used to convert recombination frequencies into map distances (centimorgan, cM). The maximum recombination rate is set to 0.40. LOD ≥ 3.0 is generally believed that there is a linkage between the two loci. We used the LOD ≥ 10 in order to classify all the 78 small linkage groups into 26 large linkage groups corresponding to all the 26 chromosomes. During this process some primers failed to get on linkage group. Mapchart 2.2 software was used to draw map using the map distances and loci obtained from JoinMap. Segregation distortion is a ubiquitous phenomenon in interspecific crosses, which distort the segregation ratio. χ2-test was used to determine the skewness in the segregation ratios.
Chromosome Assignments and Nomenclature
Chromosome assignment was established by the common markers that were already anchored by other authors in previous publications according to CMD website (http://www.cottonmarker.org/cmap/index.shtml). Chromosomal nomenclature was used as mentioned by Guo et al. (2008) Nanjing Agricultural University i.e., SSR loci anchored on chromosomes (Chr.) 1–13 were designated to the A sub-genome (At), whereas loci confined to Chr. 14–26 were designated to the D sub-genome (Dt).
The map constructed through these studies is one of the three densest genetic maps in cotton however; this is the first dense genome wide SSR interspecific genetic map between G. hirsutum and G. tomentosum. This map will play an important role in understanding the genome structure of G. tomentosum and also open the doors for further in-depth genome research such as fine mapping, map-based cloning, evolutionary studies, tagging genes of interest from wild relatives, MAS and comparative mapping not only in cotton but also with other species as well.
KW, MK, and FL designed the experiments. MK and HC conceived the experiments and analyzed the results. MK carried out most of the experiments, MK and HC carried out all computational analyses. ZZ, MI, XW, XC, CW, FL participated in part of mapping experiments directly or indirectly like contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools etc. MK, HC, and MI drafted the manuscript and KW revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
This program was financially sponsored by the Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (2012AA101108, 2013AA102601) and the State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology Open Fund (CB2014C03).
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.00436
BC, Back Cross; cM, Centimorgan; DH, Doubled Haploid; DNA, Deoxyribonucleic Acid; eSSR, EST-SSR; gSSRs, Genomic SSR; EST, Expressed Sequence Tag; EST-SSRs, Expressed Sequence Tag derived-SSRs; F1, First Filial Generation; F2, Second Filial Generation; LOD, Likelihood Odds Ratio; CMD, Cotton Marker Database; MAS, Marker Assisted Selection; SDR, Segregation distortion region; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction; QTL, Quantitative trait loci; RFLP, Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism; SSR, Simple Sequence Repeat; RIL, Recombinant Inbred Lines; SDR, Segregation Distortion Region; SNP, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism; spp., Species.
Brubaker, C. L., Bourland, F. M., and Wendel, J. F. (1999a). “The origin and domestication of cotton,” in Cotton: Origin, History, Technology and Production, eds W. Smith and T. Cothren (New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 3–31.
Burr, B., Evola, S. V., Burr, F. A., and Beckmann, J. S. (1983). “The application of restriction fragment length polymorphism to plant breeding,” in Genetic Engineering, Vol. 5, eds J. K. Setlow and A. Hollander (New York, NY: Plenum Press), 45–59.
Cloutier, S., Cappadocia, M., and Landry, B. S. (1995). Study of microspore-culture responsiveness in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) by comparative mapping of a F2 population and two microspore-derived populations. Theo. Appl. Genet. 91, 841–847. doi: 10.1007/bf00223890
Frelichowski, J. E. Jr., Palmer, M. B., Main, D., Tomkins, J. P., Cantrell, R. G., Stelly, D. M., et al. (2006). Cotton genome mapping with new microsatellites from Acala ‘Maxxa’ BAC-ends. Mol. Genet. Gen. 275, 479–491. doi: 10.1007/s00438-006-0106-z
Guo, W. Z., Cai, C. P., Wang, C. B., Zhao, L., Wang, L., and Zhang, T. Z. (2008). A preliminary analysis of genome structure and composition in Gossypium hirsutum. BMC Genomics 9:314. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-314
Guo, W. Z., Cai, C. P., Wang, C. B., Han, Z. G., Song, X. L., Wang, K., et al. (2007). A microsatellite-based, gene-rich linkage map reveals genome structure, function and evolution in Gossypium. Genetics 176, 527–541. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.070375
Gutierrez, O. A., Basu, S., Saha, S., Jenkins, J. N., Shoemaker, D. B., Cheatham, C. L., et al. (2002). Genetic distance among selected cotton genotypes and its relationship with F2 performance. Crop Sci. 42, 1841–1847. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2002.1841
Han, Z. G., Guo, W. Z., Song, X. L., and Zhang, T. Z. (2004). Genetic mapping of EST-derived microsatellites from the diploid Gossypium arboreum in allotetraploid cotton. Mol. Gen. Genomics 272, 308–327. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1059-8
Han, Z. G., Wang, C. B., Song, X. L., Guo, W. Z., Gou, J. Y., Li, C. H., et al. (2006). Characteristics, development and mapping of Gossypium hirsutum derived EST-SSR in allotetraploid cotton. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112, 430–439. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-0142-9
Harushima, Y., Kurata, N., Yano, M., Nagamura, Y., Sasaki, T., Minobe, Y., et al. (1996). Detection of segregation distortions in an indica-japonica rice cross using a high-resolution molecular map. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 145–150. doi: 10.1007/BF00223368
He, D. H., Lin, Z. X., Zhang, X. L., Nie, Y. C., Guo, X. P., Zhang, Y. X., et al. (2007). QTL mapping for economic traits based on a dense genetic map of cotton with PCR-based markers using the interspecific cross of Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense. Euphytica 153, 181–197. doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9254-9
Jiang, C., Wright, R. J., Woo, S. S., DelMonte, T. A., and Paterson, A. H. (2000). QTL analysis of leaf morphology in tetraploid Gossypium (cotton). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100, 409–418. doi: 10.1007/s001220050054
Jiang, C. X., Chee, P. W., Draye, X., Morrell, P. L., Smith, C. W., and Paterson, A. H. (2000). Multilocus interactions restrict gene introgression in interspecific populations of polyploid Gossypium (cotton). Evolution 54, 798–814. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00081.x
Jiang, C. X., Wright, R. J., El-Zik, K. M., and Paterson, A. H. (1998). Polyploid formation created unique avenues for response to selection in Gossypium (cotton). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 4419–4424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4419
Lacape, J. M., Jacobs, J., Arioli, T., Derijcker, R., Forestier-Chiron, N., Llewellyn, D., et al. (2009). A new interspecific, Gossypium hirsutum × G. barbadense, RIL population: towards a unified consensus linkage map of tetraploid cotton. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119, 281–292. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1037-y
Lacape, J. M., Nguyen, T. B., Courtois, B., Belot, J. L., Giband, M., Gourlot, J. P., et al. (2005). QTL Analysis of cotton fiber quality using multiple Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense backcross generations. Crop Sci. 45, 123–140. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0123a
Lacape, J. M., Nguyen, T. B., Thibivilliers, S., Bojinov, B., Courtois, B., Cantrell, R. G., et al. (2003). A combined RFLP-SSR-AFLP map of tetraploid cotton based on a Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense backcross population. Genome 46, 612–626. doi: 10.1139/g03-050
Li, H. B., Kilian, A., Zhou, M. X., Wenzl, P., Huttner, E., Mendham, N., et al. (2010). Construction of a high-density composite map and comparative mapping of segregation distortion regions in barley. Mol Genet Genomics 284, 319–331. doi: 10.1007/s00438-010-0570-3
Li, W., Lin, Z., and Zhang, X. (2007). A novel segregation distortion in intraspecific population of asian cotton (Gossypium arboretum L.) detected by molecular markers. J. Genet. Genomics 34, 634–640. doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60072-1
Lin, Z., He, D., Zhang, X., Nie, Y., Guo, X., Feng, C., et al. (2005). Linkage map construction and mapping QTL for cotton fibre quality using SRAP, SSR and RAPD. Plant Breed. 124, 180–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.01039.x
Ma, X., Zhou, B., Lu, Y., Guo, W., and Zhang, T. (2008). Simple sequence repeat genetic linkage maps of A-genome diploid cotton (Gossypium arboreum). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 50, 491–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00636.x
Mei, M., Syed, N. H., Gao, W., Thaxton, P. M., Smith, C. W., Stelly, D. M., et al. (2004). Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of fiber-related traits in cotton (Gossypium). Theor. Appl. Genet. 108, 280–291. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1433-7
Nguyen, T. B., Giband, M., Brottier, P., Risterucci, A. M., and Lacape, J. M. (2004). Wide coverage of the tetraploid cotton genome using newly developed microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 167–175. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1612-1
Park, Y. H., Alabady, M. S., Ulloa, M., Sickler, B., Wilkins, T. A., Yu, J., et al. (2005). Genetic mapping of new cotton fiber loci using EST-derived microsatellites in an interspecific recombinant inbred line cotton population. Mol. Genet. Gen. 274, 428–441. doi: 10.1007/s00438-005-0037-0
Pereira, M. G., Lee, M., Bramel-Cox, P., Woodman, W., Doebley, J., and Whitkus, R. (1994). Construction of an RFLP map in sorghum and comparative mapping in maize. Genome 37, 236–243. doi: 10.1139/g94-033
Reddy, O. U. K., Pepper, A. E., Abdurakhmonov, I. Y., Saha, S., Jenkins, J. N., Brooks, T. D., et al. (2001). New dinucleotide and trinucleotide microsatellite marker resources for cotton genome research. J. Cott. Sci. 5, 103–113.
Reinisch, M. J., Dong, J., Brubaker, C. L., Stelly, D. M., Wendel, J. F., and Paterson, A. H. (1994). A detailed RFLP map of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense: chromosome organization and evolution in a disomic polyploid genome. Genetics 138, 829–847.
Rong, J. K., Abbey, C., Bowers, J. E., Brubaker, C. L., Chang, C., Chee, P. W., et al. (2004). A 3347-locus genetic recombination map of sequence-tagged sites reveals features of genome organization, transmission and evolution of cotton (Gossypium). Genetics 166, 389–417. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.389
Saha, S., Karaca, M., Jenkins, J. N., Zipf, A. E., Reddy, O. U. K., and Kantety, R. V. (2003). Simple sequence repeats as useful resources to study transcribed genes of cotton. Euphytica 130, 355–364. doi: 10.1023/A:1023077209170
Saranga, Y., Menz, M., Jiang, C. X., Wright, R. J., Yakir, D., and Paterson, A. H. (2001). Genomic dissection of genotype × environment interactions conferring adaptation of cotton to arid conditions. Genome Res. 11, 1988–1995. doi: 10.1101/gr.157201
Song, X., Wang, K., Guo, W., Zhang, J., and Zhang, T. (2005). A comparison of genetic maps constructed from haploid and BC1 mapping populations from the same crossing between Gossypium hirsutum L. and Gossypium barbadense L. Genome 48, 378–390. doi: 10.1139/g04-126
Stewart, J. M. (1995). “Potential for crop improvement with exotic germplasm and genetic engineering,” in Challenging the Future. Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference-1, eds G. Constable and N. Forrester (Melbourne: CSIRO), 313–327.
Tanksley, S. D., Miller, J. C., Paterson, A. H., and Bernatzky, R. (1988). “Molecular mapping of plant chromosomes,” in Chromosome Structure and Function, eds J. Gustafson and R. Appels (New York, NY: Plenum Press), 157–172.
Ulloa, M., Meredith, W. R. Jr., Shappley, Z. W., and Kahler, A. L. (2002). Genetic linkage maps from four F2:3 populations and a join maps of Gossypium hirsutum L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101, 200–208. doi: 10.1007/s001220100739
Van Esbroeck, G. A., Bowman, D. T., Calhoun, D. S., and May, O. L. (1998). Changes in the genetic diversity of cotton in the U.S. from 1970 to 1995. Crop Sci. 38, 33–37. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800010006x
Waghmare, V. N., Rong, J., Rogers, C. J., Pierce, G. J., Wendel, J. F., and Paterson, A. H. (2005). Genetic mapping of a cross between Gossypium hirsutum (cotton) and the Hawaiian endemic, Gossypium tomentosum. Theor. Appl. Genet.111, 665–676. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-2032-6
Wendel, J. F., Brubaker, C., Alvarez, I., Cronn, R., and Stewart, J. M. (2009). “Plant genetics and genomics: crops and models,” in Genetics and Genomics of Cotton: Evolution and Natural History of the Cotton Genus, Vol 3, eds A. H. Paterson (New York, NY: Springer Science Business Media, L. L. C.), 3–22. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-70810-2
Yu, J. Z., Kohel, R. J., Fang, D. D., Cho, J., Van Deynze, A., Ulloa, M., et al. (2012). A high-density simple sequence repeat and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic map of the tetraploid cotton genome. Genes Genomes Genet. 2, 43–58. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.001552
Yu, Y., Yuan, D. J., Liang, S. G., Li, X. M., Wang, X. Q., Lin, Z. X., et al. (2011). Genome structure of cotton revealed by a genome-wide SSR genetic map constructed from a BC1 population between Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadense. BMC Genomics 12:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-15
Zhang, J., Guo, W., and Zhang, T. (2002). Molecular linkage map of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. × Gossypium barbadense L.) with a haploid population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105, 1166–1174. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1100-4
Zhang, J. F., Lu, Y. Z., and Yu, S. X. (2005). Cleaved AFLP (cAFLP), a modified amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis for cotton. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111, 1385–1395. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-0070-8
Zhang, Y. X., Lin, Z. X., Xia, Q. Z., Zhang, M. G., and Zhang, X. L. (2008). Characteristics and analysis of simple sequence repeats in the cotton genome based on a linkage map constructed from a BC1 population between Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadense. Genome 51, 534–546. doi: 10.1139/G08-033
Zhao, L., Lv, Y., Cai, C., Tong, X., Chen, X., Zhang, W., et al. (2012). Toward allotetraploid cotton genome assembly: integration of a high-density molecular genetic linkage map with DNA sequence information. BMC Genomics 13:539. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-539
Keywords: genetic map, interspecific cross, Gossypium tomentosum, wild cotton, SSR primer pairs
Citation: Khan MKR, Chen H, Zhou Z, Ilyas MK, Wang X, Cai X, Wang C, Liu F and Wang K (2016) Genome Wide SSR High Density Genetic Map Construction from an Interspecific Cross of Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium tomentosum. Front. Plant Sci. 7:436. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00436
Received: 11 December 2015; Accepted: 21 March 2016;
Published: 13 April 2016.
Edited by:Henry T. Nguyen, University of Missouri, USA
Reviewed by:Xun Xu, Beijing Genomics Institute-Shenzhen, China
Manish Kumar Pandey, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, India
Copyright © 2016 Khan, Chen, Zhou, Ilyas, Wang, Cai, Wang, Liu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.