Impact Factor 4.402 | CiteScore 7.8
More on impact ›

Frontiers in Plant Science

Plant Genetics and Genomics

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Plant Sci., 20 April 2016 |

Genome-Wide Identification, Classification, and Expression Analysis of Amino Acid Transporter Gene Family in Glycine Max

Lin Cheng1,2, Hong-Yu Yuan1, Ren Ren3, Shi-Qi Zhao1, Ya-Peng Han1, Qi-Ying Zhou1, Dan-Xia Ke1, Ying-Xiang Wang3* and Lei Wang1,2*
  • 1Bioinformatics Laboratory, College of Life Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China
  • 2Institute for Conservation and Utilization of Agro-Bioresources in Dabie Mountains, Xinyang, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Institute of Genetics, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Amino acid transporters (AATs) play important roles in transporting amino acid across cellular membranes and are essential for plant growth and development. To date, the AAT gene family in soybean (Glycine max L.) has not been characterized. In this study, we identified 189 AAT genes from the entire soybean genomic sequence, and classified them into 12 distinct subfamilies based upon their sequence composition and phylogenetic positions. To further investigate the functions of these genes, we analyzed the chromosome distributions, gene structures, duplication patterns, phylogenetic tree, tissue expression patterns of the 189 AAT genes in soybean. We found that a large number of AAT genes in soybean were expanded via gene duplication, 46 and 36 GmAAT genes were WGD/segmental and tandemly duplicated, respectively. Further comprehensive analyses of the expression profiles of GmAAT genes in various stages of vegetative and reproductive development showed that soybean AAT genes exhibited preferential or distinct expression patterns among different tissues. Overall, our study provides a framework for further analysis of the biological functions of AAT genes in either soybean or other crops.


Amino acids are the currency of nitrogen exchange in plants (Ortiz-Lopez et al., 2000) and are the second most abundant class of organic compounds found in the phloem sap after sucrose (Rentsch et al., 1998). Amino acid transporters (AATs) function in long distance amino acid transport and are essential participants in the resource allocation processes that support plant growth, development, and responses to pathogen and abiotic stresses (Tegeder, 2012). The AAT genes are distinguished by the presence of PF01490 (Aa_trans) and PF00324 (Aa_permease) domains. More than 63 distinct AAT genes have been identified in Arabidopsis by means of heterologous expression systems and database screening with known transporters (Rentsch et al., 2007). Emerging evidence also identified 85 AAT genes in rice (Zhao et al., 2012), suggesting that this gene family is widely existed in higher plants.

The AAT gene family in plants includes the amino acid/auxin permease (AAAP) family and the amino acid-polyamine-choline (APC) transporter family, which belong to the APC transporter superfamily. The APC family is further grouped into cationic amino acid transporters (CATs), amino acid/choline transporters (ACTs) and polyamine H+-symporters (PHSs) subfamilies (Tegeder, 2012). The AAAP family comprises c-aminobutyric acid transporters (GATs), proline transporters (ProTs), Amino acid permeases (AAPs), lysine and histidine transporters (LHTs), auxin transporters (AUXs), and aromatic and neutral amino acid transporters (ANTs) (Saier et al., 2009; Hunt et al., 2010; Okumoto and Pilot, 2011).

Many AATs have been functionally studied in Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa) with eight members of AtAAP1-AtAAP8 in Arabidopsis and nineteen members of OsAAP1-OsAAP19 in rice, respectively (Okumoto et al., 2002; Couturier et al., 2010). In particular, detailed characterizations of AtAAP1-AtAAP6 and AtAAP8 have been carried out using heterologous expression systems, and these genes preferentially transport neutral and charged amino acids with varying specificities and affinities (Su et al., 2004). AtAAP1 is produced in Arabidopsis embryos, and mediated uptake of amino acids by the embryo is importance for storage protein synthesis and seed yield (Lee et al., 2007; Sanders et al., 2009). AtAAP2 functions in xylem-tophloem transfor (Zhang et al., 2010). AtAAP6 regulates phloem amino acid composition, thereby affecting interactions with aphids (Hunt et al., 2010). AtAAP8 plays a crucial role in the uptake of amino acids into the endosperm and in supplying the developing embryo with amino acids during early embryogenesis (Schmidt et al., 2007). The functions of AAP genes have also been studies in other species such as Vicia faba (Miranda et al., 2001), Solanum tuberosum (Koch et al., 2003), and Populus trichocarpa (Couturier et al., 2010). For example, VfAAP1 is highly expressed in the cotyledons of Vicia faba at early developmental stages and shows moderate expression in other sink tissues (Miranda et al., 2001). Moreover, VfAAP3 is expressed most abundantly in maternal tissues of roots, stems, gynoecia, pods and seed coats at different developmental stages. VfAAP4 transcripts was undetectable by northern hybridization (Miranda et al., 2001).

Many AAT genes are known function in mitigating water stress conditions in plants especially by facilitating the transport of stress-related compounds and compatible solutes, such as proline, betaine, GABA, and a variety of carbohydrates (Serrano, 1996). For example, ProT encodes an AAT protein and is a high affinity proline specific transporter (ProT) that rapidly distributes the proline under water stress conditions (Lehmann et al., 2010). Proline transporters including OsProT, AtProT1, and LeProT1 were detected using a transport assay in rice, Arabidopsis, and tomato, respectively (Schwacke et al., 1999; Grallath et al., 2005; Lehmann et al., 2011). In tomato, LeProT1 was specifically expressed in both mature and germinating pollen, and transports proline and γ-amino butyric acid with low affinity and glycine betaine with high affinity (Schwacke et al., 1999). In Arabidopsis, AtProT was highly expressed in tissues with elevated proline content such as in pollen and the epidermides of leaves (Lehmann et al., 2011). AtProT2 was shown to facilitate uptake of L- and D-proline as well as [14C] glycine betaine in plants, and these functions indicate in importing compatible solutes into the root (Lehmann et al., 2011). AAT genes also function in auxin transport-dependent plant growth and development (Swarup et al., 2008). AtAUX1 is an auxin influx carrier in roots and facilitates gravitropism and lateral root formation (Marchant et al., 1999, 2002). AtBAT1 is similar to a yeast GABA transporter (UGA4) and has been isolated as a bi-directional amino acid transporter (Dündar and Bush, 2009). Recently, AtBAT1 was characterized to be expressed in the mitochondrial membrane and mediates the transport of GABA from the cytosol into mitochondria (Michaeli et al., 2011).

Soybean (Glycine max L.) is a legume plant belonging to the Papilionoideae family and is a rich source of protein, oil and plant natural products such as isoflavonoids. The soybean genome contains 56,044 protein coding loci located on 20 different chromosomes. Soybean has undergone two whole genome duplication (WGD) events approximately 59 and 13 million years ago, leading to the presence ~85% paralogs in its genome (Shoemaker et al., 1996; Schmutz et al., 2010; Lehmann et al., 2011). Although AAT genes have been well-characterized in Arapidopsis, rice, and other plants, there have been no such studies in soybean. The complete sequence of soybean genome has enabled gene prediction tools and annotation to become publicly available. In the current study, we found that soybean has 189 AAT genes, which is larger than that in Arabidopsis and rice. Phylogenetic analysis divided 189 GmAATs into 12 clusters. Identification of intron/exon structural patterns and conserver motifs among 189 AAT members showed a high consistence between gene organization and protein structure. Expression patterns of the 189 genes in different tissues suggest that they may have functional conservation and divergence. We expect that our results provide a framework for the validation of the soybean AAT genes and broaden our understandings of the roles of AATs in plants.

Materials and Methods

Database Screening and Sequence Collection

The genome sequence of soybean was obtained from Phytozome ( To find putative AAT members in the soybean genome, several approaches were employed. First, the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile of the AAT domain (PF01490 and PF00324) was obtained from the Pfam website (, which was employed as a query to identify all possible AAT genes in soybean using HMMER v3.0 software. Second, we downloaded protein sequences of putative AAT members in soybean from Search Interpro ( = PF01490 and PF00324). After removing the redundant sequences, we submitted the remaining protein sequences to InterProScan ( to confirm the existence of AAT domains. After determining the AAT genes in the soybean genome, we acquired information about each gene including full-length cDNA accessions, coding sequence length, gene structure, and protein product characteristics. We analyzed the structure of GmAATs using tools on the GSDS website (, predicted the putative transmembrane (TM) regions in each GmAAT protein using the TMHMM Sever v2.0 ( with default settings.

Chromosomal Localization and Duplication of AAT Genes in Soybean

The chromosomal positions of GmAAT genes were mapped in Phytozome 10.1 (!info?alias=Org_Gmax). We used MapChart to draw and annotate the GmAAT genes on chromosomes. The duplication events of GmAAT genes were explored by Multiple Collonearity Scan toolkit (MCScanx: Tandem duplications were identified as multiple members of the AAT gene family occurring within the same or neighboring intergenic regions. WGD/segmental duplications of AAT gene within the family in soybean were searched in the PGDD (

Analysis of Ka, Ks and Calculation of the Duplication Event

We calculated the number of synonymous (Ks) and non-synonymous (Ka) substitutions per site of duplicated AAT genes using the MCScanX program ( The Ka and Ks were used to assess selection history (Li et al., 1981) and divergence time. For evaluating selection history, we assumed that purifying selection results in a ratio of Ka/Ks < 1 if while positive selection yields while Ka/Ks > 1 (Juretic et al., 2005). To determine divergence time between gene pairs, we assumed 6.1 × 10−9 substitutions per site per year. Thus, we calculated the divergence time (T) as T = Ks/ (2 × 6.1 × 10−9) × 10−6 Million years (My) (Lynch and Conery, 2000).

Phylogenetic Analysis and Sequence Alignment

We detected the PF01490 and PF00324 domains of GmAAT genes using SMART ( and Pfam ( In order to identify orthologous genes between soybean and Arabidopsis, we generated a Maximum Likelihood tree comprising GmAATs and AtAATs. Sequence alignments were performed using MUSCLE 3.8.31 (Edgar, 2004). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using Maximum Likelihood (ML). RAxML v8.1.3 (Stamatakis, 2014) was employed to construct ML trees, with the GTRCAT model, gamma distribution option and 100 nonparametric bootstrap replicates. Then we used MEGA 6.0 to display the phylogenetic tree (Tamura et al., 2013). The software Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) ( was used using the following parameters: the width of a motif was between 20aa and 300aa and the number of motif was 20. We analyzed the conservation of amino acid sequences in the GmAAT subfamily using DNAMAN software and modified manually and detected conserved motifs using MEME analysis. We also identified and annotated transmembrane (TM) domains using the TMHMM 2.0 server ( numbers and positions of exons and introns were determined through the comparison of full-length cDNA sequences and the corresponding genomic DNA sequences of each AAT gene in soybean by using GSDS (

Expression Analysis of AATs in 11 Tissues of Soybean

To analyze expression patterns of soybean AAT, we used RNA-seq data as generated previously (Wang et al., 2014). These data include reads from 11 tissues of soybean including root tip (RT), hypocotyl, cotyledon, callus, shoot aptical meristem at 6, 17, and 38 day stages (SAM6d, SAM17d, SAM38d), axillary meristem (AM), inflorescences before and after the meiotic stage (IBM, IAM) and open flower (OF).

The normalized gene expression level was calculated as Reads Per Kilo-base of mRNA length per Millions of mapped reads (RPKM) by the GFOLD V1.0.7 software (Feng et al., 2012). The expression patterns analysis of AAT genes in these tissues were performed by R software.

Results and Discussion

Identification of AAT Genes in Soybean Genome

Initially, we identified 206 putative AAT genes in soybean. After screening regarding on the presence of PF01490 and PF00324 domains, we removed 17 candidates because their characteristic domains were short or incomplete. Thus, we identified a total of 189 AATs in soybean, which is greater than that identified in other model species, including Arabidopsis and rice with 63 and 85 AATs, respectively.

We renamed the 189 AAT genes in soybean according to their affinities within gene subfamilies (Table S1). Details of each gene including its nucleic acid and protein sequence are provided in Table S1. The identified soybean AAT genes encode peptides ranging from 133 to 742 amino acids with the isoelectric points (pI) varying from 5.06 to 9.98 and molecular weights (Mw) varying from 14.3 to 81.1 kD.

To obtain fully understand relative information in soybean AATs, the putative transmembrane (TM) regions were predicted by TMHMM server. The number of TM regions in most GmAATs ranges from 0 to 15 (Table S1), and the same subfamily have the similar TM regions, such as 10 or 11 in ProT and 10 or 12 in ACT. Among which, GmACT1 and GmAAP33 were not identified with any TM with TMHMM prediction, suggesting that it might lost its function during gene expansion. Even so, the change of TM regions in the soybean was greater than in rice.

Chromosomal Distribution and Duplication Analysis of AAT Family Genes in Soybean

We mapped 188 of the 189 AAT genes in soybean to the 20 soybean chromosomes, and the remaining gene GmATL39 showed affinity with yet unattributed scaffolds (Figure 1). The AAT genes in soybean were unevenly distributed among chromosomes, but all chromosomes possessed at least one. The largest number of GmAAT genes on a single chromosome was 16 on chromosome 11, while chromosomes 09, 18, and 13 possessed 15 each. In addition, 12 genes each are located on chromosome 02 and 06; 11 genes are located on chromosome 05; 10 genes each are located on chromosome 01, 10, and 19; 8 genes each are located on chromosome 08, 12, 17, and 20; 6 genes are located on chromosome 16; 4 genes each are located on chromosome 03, 13, and 15. In contrast, chromosome 07 possessed only one GmAAT gene. Meanwhile, duplicated segments are mainly present on chromosome 02, 04, 05, and 10, and 18 gene groups in tandem duplication are localized on 13 chromosomes (Figure 1).


Figure 1. Chromosomal localization and gene duplication events of GmAAT genes. Respective chromosome numbers are indicated at the top of each bar. The scale on the left is in megabases (Mb). The cleavages on the chromosomes (vertical bars) indicate the positon of centromeres. yes WGD/Segmentally duplicated genes yes Tandemly duplicated genes.

Gene duplication is thought to be an important mean of gene family expansion and functional diversity evolution (Kong et al., 2007). Gene duplication is known to occur in three major ways, namely through chromosomal segmental duplication, tandem duplication and whole genome duplication (WGD). Previous studies have shown that the soybean genome has undergone two rounds of WGD that occurred approximately 59 and 13 million years ago (Mya) (Schmutz et al., 2010). However, the functions of duplicated genes are often poorly understood. Among the 189 AAT genes in soybean, 40.74% (77 of 189) represent duplication events, including 46 segmental duplications and 36 tandem duplications (GmATL11, GmProT3, GmACT6, GmATL12, GmCAT4, GmACT4 are both WGD and tandem duplication genes). We were able to assign the 46 (23 pairs) WGD duplicated GmAAT genes to blocks based on the analysis of the MCScanX program. The 36 genes tandemly duplicated genes represented eight groups. Four groups comprised two genes each, one group comprised five genes, two groups comprised six genes, and one group comprised 11 genes. The tandemly duplicated genes are localized on 13 chromosomes; namely, two groups on chromosome 19 and one group each on chromosomes 02/04/05/06/09/10/12/14/16/ 17/18 and 20 (Figure 1). Moreover, 16 of 35 genes in GmAPC subfamily are involved in the duplication events, and the duplications probably explain the difference in the number of APC genes in soybean compared to Arabidopsis, which has only 15 total APCs (Okumoto and Pilot, 2011).

According to the ration of Ka/Ks descripted previously, the history of selection acting on coding sequence can be estimated (Li et al., 1981). Previous studies shown that the soybean genome had experienced two rounds of whole genome duplication (WGD), an ancient duplication prior to the divergence of papilionoid (58–60 Mya) and a recent Glycine-specific WGD event occurring approximately 13 Mya (Schmutz et al., 2010). Ks value was calculated for estimating the separation time of each paralogous gene pair (Table 1). All the Ks values ranged from 0.1 to 0.9 with two peaks at 0.1–0.2 and 0.35–0.4, which were consisted with whole genome duplication events at round 13 and 59 Mya. In addition, our divergence time analyses showed that duplications among 23 paralogous pairs occurred between 6.78 and 76.51 Mya (Table 1). We demonstrated that 20 paralogous pairs derived from the second WGD except the GmCAT7/GmCAT9, GmPHS1/GmPHS2, and GmACT4/GmACT6. It suggested the WGD duplication might be the main mechanism of AAT gene family expansion and functional diversity during evolution of soybean. This result consisted with some other gene families in soybean, such as GST supergene family (Liu et al., 2015), receptor-like protein kinase genes (Zhou et al., 2016), HSP70 genes (Zhang et al., 2015) in soybean, or AP2/ERF superfamily genes and 14-3-3 family genes in Medicago truncatula (Chen et al., 2001; Qin et al., 2016; Shu et al., 2016).


Table 1. Divergence between AAT segmentally duplicate gene pairs in soybean.

The history of selection acting on coding sequences can also be estimated according to Ka/Ks (Li et al., 1981). A pair of sequences will have Ka/Ks < 1 if one sequence has been under purifying selection but the other has been drifting neutrally, while Ka/Ks = 1 if both sequences are drifting neutrally and rarely, Ka/Ks > 1 at specific sites that are under positive selection (Juretic et al., 2005). Twenty-one pairs of all Ka/Ks ratios of duplicated GmAAT gene pairs were less than 0.6. A summary of Ka/Ks ratios was presented in Table 1. A total of 46 (24.3%) AAT genes in soybean were found located on duplicated chromosomal. The result suggested that all gene pairs have evolved mainly under the influence of purifying selection.

Comparison of Gene Structures and Conserved Motifs among 189 AATs in Soybean

It has been well studied that the intron/exon organizations, intron types and numbers are one of the representative imprints of the evolution within some gene families (Javelle et al., 2011; Du et al., 2012; Hudson and Hudson, 2015). We examined these features for the 189 GmAAT genes and observed that the same group shared similar exon/intron structures, e.g., intron and exon arrangement, such as GmCAT13 and GmCAT14, GmPHS8 and GmPHS9, GmATL15 and GmATL16, GmATL17 and GmATL18 (Figure 2). In contrast, some members in the same cluster also showed variation in intron/exon organization. Obvious changes were found in the 5′-UTR or/and 3′-UTR of some genes as compared with their paralogs, such as GmAAP24, GmATL13, GmATL36, GmAUX3, GmProT1, et al. (Figure 2). The positions of exon and intron in the AAT genes of soybean are presented in Figure 2. Introns are absent from the open reading frames of nine GmAAT genes, and the number of introns in other coding sequences range from one to sixteen. Within subfamilies, most members share similar intron/exon structures and gene lengths. Gene structure analysis revealed that exon and intron positions and length were conserved within gene subfamilies, and this may indicate the close evolutionary relationships and the introduced classification of subfamilies. Together, these results indicate that intron/exon structure may have a role to result in functional conservation or diversification during long-term evolution among soybean AAT gene family.


Figure 2. Exon/intron organization of GmAAT genes in each subfamily. Green boxes represent exons and block line represent introns. The untranslated regions (UTRs) are indicated by red and yellow boxes. The size of exons and introns can be estimated using the scale at the bottom.

The phylogenetic relationship and classification of GmAATs were further supported by motif analysis (Figure S1, Table 2). Twenty conserved motifs of GmAATs were captured by motif analysis using MEME software. We found that several motifs were widespread among GmAATs of the AAAP family, such as motif 4, 8, 11. In contrast, other motifs were specific to only one or two subfamilies. For example, motifs 1 and 2 were specific to the AUX subfamily, motifs 3 and 19 were specific to the AAP subfamily, motifs 14 and 18 were specific to the CAT subfamily, motifs 15 and 20 were specific to the ATLb subfamily, motif 16 occurred only in the ATLa subfamily, and motif 17 was found in only in subfamilies GAT and ProT. However, motif 8 was present in the ATLa, ATLb, AUX, AAP, GAT, ProT, LHT, and ANT subfamilies (Table 2).


Table 2. The MEME motif sequences and lengths in GmAAT proteins.

Phylogenetic Analysis and Multiple Sequence Alignment

Our ML phylogenetic tree reveals 12 highly supported, distinct clades based on the similarities of their nucleotide sequence (Figure 3A, Figures S1, S2). This is a far greater number of AAT genes that are found in rice and Arabidopsis, which have 85 and 63 AATs, respectively. This could be caused by the experience of the recent twice whole genome duplication in soybean. We identified an AAAP family, which consists of 153 GmAATs, including eight distinct subfamilies comprising amino acid permeases (AAPs), lysine, histidine transporters (LHTs), proline transporters (ProTs), GABA transporters (GATs), auxin transporters (AUXs), aromatic and neutral amino acid transporters (ANTs) and amino acid transporter-like (ATL) subfamilies (Table S1). An ATL family consists of two clades or subfamilies: ATLa and ATLb. Our tree also supports an APC family that comprises 35 GmAATs and is subdivided into three distinct subfamilies: the cationic amino acid transporters (CATs), the amino acid/choline transporters (ACTs) and the polyamine H+-symporters (PHSs) (Table S1). Within soybean, we found large differences in the numbers of genes within the subfamilies (Figures S1, S2). In particular, we detected 35 genes in the GmAAP subfamily and only one in the GmTTP subfamily (Figure S1). Specifically, there were 19 GATs in soybean and 2 in Arabidopsis, 7 ACTs in soybean and 1 in Arabidopsis, 35 AAPs in soybean and 8 in Arabidopsis, 16 AUXs in soybean and 4 in Arabidopsis, 16 ATLas in soybean and 5 in Arabidopsis, and 30 ATLbs in soybean and 10 in Arabidopsis (Figure 3B). Nevertheless, our combined phylogenetic analysis of AAT genes in soybean and Arabidopsis revealed the monophyly of the subfamilies, which were shared between the two species (Figure 2, Figure S2).


Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of the nucleotide sequences of AAT genes in soybean and Arabidopsis. (A) The tree was conducted based on the AAT gene nucleotide sequences using RAxML by 100 bootstrap replicates. The tree shows twelve major phylogenetic subfamilies indicated with different colors. (B) The different numbers were shown between Arabidopsis and soybean in each subfamily.

The alignments of the amino acid sequences of the GmAATs illustrated that TM regions were conserved within subfamilies. In addition, several TM regions of different members varied insignificantly both in length and amino acid composition. The alignment of the GmAUX members is shown in Figure 4 as an example. The protein sequences of the GmAUX genes are 75.04% similar. There are 5 conserved motifs in GmAUXs, including motifs 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10. TM1 was located in motif 4 (Figure 4). TM2, TM3, TM4, TM5, and TM6 were located in motif 1 (Figure 4). TM 8, TM9 and TM10 were located in motif 2 (Figure 4).


Figure 4. Multiple sequence alignment and transmembrane region of AUX subfamily in soybean. Identical (100%), conservative (75–99%), and block (50–74%) of similar amino acid residues are shaded in deep blue, brick red, and pale yellow, respectively. The transmembrane regions are marked by blue lines. The conserved motifs 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8 are orderly marked by green rectangles.

The Relationship between Phylogenetic Analysis and the Expression Patterns of GmAAT Genes

To determine expression patterns of GmAAT genes, we used publicly-available genome-wide transcript profiling data of soybean tissues as a resource (Wang et al., 2014). Results showed that soybean AAT genes were expressed in distinct patterns (Figure 5). In particular, 35 AAT genes in soybean showed less than twofold expression variation in different tissues, suggesting that they are not developmentally regulated at the transcription levels (Table S2). Multiple GmAAT genes were highly expressed in OF except the ACT group, which showed no expression in OF. GmAAT genes were constitutively expressed among several tissues, but others showed preferential expression in specific tissues. For example, GmPHS3/GmANT4/GmATL37/GmATL38/GmAAP8/GmLHT17 were predominantly expressed in OF; GmATL21 in hypocotyl; GmATL41 in root; GmLHT1/GmLHT2/GmLHT20/GmLHT22 in callus. Moreover, GmATL6, GmAAP27, GmProT5, and GmLHT16 exhibited a highly tissue-specific expression pattern in OF while GmATL7 and GmLHT22 was highly concentrated in callus. Moreover, ten GmAAT genes had high expression levels in two different tissues.


Figure 5. Heat map representation of AAT genes in various tissues of soybean. The RNA-seq relative expression data of 11 tissues was used to re-construct expression patterns of soybean AAT genes. Sources of samples are as follows: root, hypocotyl, cotyledon, callus, shoot apical meristem at 6, 17, and 38 day stage (referred to as SAM6d, SAM17d, SAM38d for convenience), as well as the axillary meristem (referred to as AM), inflorescences before and after the meiotic stage (referred to as IBM and IAM), and open flower (referred to as OF).

The genes from GmACT subfamily were highly expressed in the root; especially GmACT1 to GmACT7. The broad expression of these genes in roots may be related to regulation of developmental adaption to environmental stress conditions such as drought. Roots under water stress send chemical signals to shoots and also attempt to continue growth and obtain additional water resources through water foraging (Tardieu and Simonneau, 1998; Grant et al., 2010). Nine GmAAT genes showed no expression in one, three, five or six tissues. GmANT4 was undetectable in hypocotyl, cotyledon, callus, SAM17d and axillary but highly expressed in OF; GmLHT16 was not expressed in root, hypocotyl, cotyledon, callus, SAM17d, axillary but highly expressed in OF; GmAUX13 was not expressed in callus, SAM17d and OF, but highly expressed in root and hypocotyl, respectively; GmATL21 and GmAUX2 were not expressed in callus but highly expressed in hypocotyl. Eighteen GmAAT genes were not detected in any of the tissues that we examined. These genes may be expressed in distinct tissue types or they may represent untranscribed pseudogenes.

Previous studies suggested that phylogenetic analysis provided clues on functional prediction of various genes. In general, members from the same subfamily shared similar exon/intron structures in exon length and the number of intron such as the GmAUX sbufamily; however, some members of the GmCAT, GmATLa, GmATLb, and GmAAP subfamilies (Figure 2, Table S1) had structural differences from other members. AtLAX3 and AtAUX1 were dominantly expressed in root and accelerated root formation laterally (Yang et al., 2006; Ugartechea-Chirino et al., 2010). It was also observed in our investigation that GmAUX5, 6, 13, 14, 15, and 16 were almost preferentially expressed in root. Similar expression patterns imply that these specificially expressed genes might play significant roles in root formation or development laterally. AAP members in Arabidopsis play critical roles in nutrient transport during seed development or long-distance transport of amino acids (Zhang et al., 2015). It was reported that AtAAP1 localized to the plasma membrane of root epidermal cells and root hairs and involved in the uptake of amino acids into root cells (Lee et al., 2007). It was known that AtAAP3 might be responsible for amino acid uptake from xylem (Okumoto et al., 2004). AtAAP8 had been demonstrated that may be involved in amino acid uptake into the endosperm and supplying the developing embryo with amino acids during early embryogenesis (Schmidt et al., 2007). According to the previously reported, some of the AAPs were correlated with grain protein content (GPC), which is an important determinant of nutritional quality in cereals. OsAAP6 was confirmed that could greatly enhance the absorption of several amino acids in root and has effects on the GPC (Peng et al., 2014). A Vicia faba amino acid permease, VfAAP1, which was reported improve plant nitrogen status and lead to higher seed protein contains by increasing seed sink strength for nitrogen (Rolletschek et al., 2005). Interestingly, several GmAAP genes were expressed in several specific tissues of soybean (Figure 5). The close relationship between sequence conservation and expression patterns may help us to select candidate genes that respond to diverse environmental stimuli or significant genes in developmental stages (Wang et al., 2012).

Gene Duplication and Expression Patterns of Duplicated AAT Genes

Events of gene duplication may serve as a critical mechanism for increasing the diversity of a gene family, especially through non-functionalization, sub-functionalization and neo-functionalization of the duplicated genes. Sub- and neo-functioning duplicates lead to functional diversity within families and may be expressed in a different tissue or at a different developmental stages than their progenitor (Bhattacharjee et al., 2015). Gene duplication and diversification events are well documented in Arabidopsis (Duarte et al., 2006). We observed that majority of duplicated AAT genes in soybean were differentially expressed within the tissue/organ/developmental stages. Based on gene expression patterns, we observed three types of functional variations in homologous gene pairs in soybean. For instance, we observed sub-functionalization or neo-functionalization in the GmATL25/GmATL26 gene pair. Specifically, GmATL25 but not GmATL26 was expressed in the cotyledons and the callus, while GmATL26 but not GmATL25 was expressed in the SAM6D and SAM38D. In the GmGAT16/ GmGAT17 gene pair, GmGAT16 expression decreased to basal level in the callus, IAT and OF compared to GmGAT17. In the GmCAT7/GmCAT8 gene pair, GmCAT7 was only expressed in IBT, IAT and OF compared to GmCAT8. In the GmANT5/GmANT6 gene pair, GmANT5 was expressed only in the callus and OF, but GmANT6 was expressed only in hypocotyls and cotyledons. In the GmProT2/GmProT3 gene pair, we detected high expression levels of GmProT2 in cotyledons and the callus, but GmProT3 was not expressed in these two tissues. The GmAAP2/GmAAP3 gene pair, exhibited identical expression patters in all ten tissues except in the callus and OF. The phenomenon of non-functionalization was exhibited in the GmGAT2/GmGAT4/GmGAT5 duplication event. In particular, GmGAT2 and GmGAT5 were expressed in the hypocotyls, cotyledons, IBT, IAT, and OF, but GmGAT4 did not show expression in most of the tissues that we surveyed (Figure 5). These observations imply that the evolutionary fate of AAT genes in soybean have been strongly affected by gene duplication events. Overall, our results show that purifying selection has contributed to retention and maintenance of duplicated gene pairs during evolution. Moreover, expression profiling of duplicated soybean AAT proteins highlighted that majority of them have undergone sub-functionalization. Such observations are consistent with other plant species, where closely related genes have diverse expression patterns.

Expression Profiles of AAT Genes and Functional Diversity of Duplicated Pairs in Soybean

We investigated the expression profiles of AAT genes using public soybean expression data and found that most AAT genes are widely expressed, suggesting that these soybean AAT genes remained after WGD events are likely functional (Figure 6). According to the expression patterns of soybean AAT genes as related to their Arabidopsis orthologs, we hypothesize that these genes may also have potential functions in soybean. We also found that soybean and Arabidopsis have 23 and 15 duplicated AAT gene pairs, respectively. Among the 23 duplicated gene pairs, 15 of them are expressed in two copies and were defined to three types regarding on expression patterns (Figure 6).


Figure 6. Three trends of expression patterns of duplicated AAT gene pairs in soybean. X-axis indicates representative tissues, organs and Y-axis represents scale. Purple box: two copies have the same expression pattern in almost 11 tissues. Black box: one duplicate was expressed at higher levels than the other in all tissues. Fuchsia box: the two copies have the diversely expression patterns in different tissues. R, root; Hy, hypocotyl; Co, cotyledon; Ca, callus; S6, SAM6d; S17, SAM17d; S38, SAM38d; AM, axillary meristem; IB, inflorescences before the meiotic stage; IA, inflorescences after the meiotic stage; OF, open flower.

The first type is that two copies have the same expression pattern in almost eleven tissues (Figure 6, purple boxes). For example, The Arabidopsis AtAAP6 gene corresponds to the soybean AAP28 and AAP29. AtAAP6 might be serve a different role either in cooperating with the lower affinity systems to acquire amino acids in the low concentration range, as a system responsible for aspartate transport or as a uptake system from the xylem (Fischer et al., 2002). GmLHT5/GmLHT6, GmAAP13/GmAAP14 were the highest expression in SAM17d or hypocotyl relative to the other tissues, suggesting that these genes may undertake significant functions in special developmental stage of soybean. The second type is that one duplicate was expressed at higher levels than the other in all tissues (Figure 6, black boxes), implying that the former has a stronger function than the latter. One copy had wide-range high level expression indicating that it my play important roles in regulating broad developmental or reproductive stages. The third type is that the two copies have the diversely expression patterns in different tissues (Figure 6, fuchsia boxes). For example, GmANT5 and GmANT6 corresponded to Arabidopsis ANT1, which was induced by high concentrations of nitrate and expressed in all organs with highest abundance in cauline leaves and flowers (Chen et al., 2001; Liu and Bush, 2006). The GmANT5 and GmANT6 pairs in soybean are both expressed at the same stage.

The different expression patterns of 15 duplicated gene pairs in different tissues imply possible function redundancy or functional diversification, respectively (Innan and Kondrashov, 2010). Diverse expression profiles in different tissues of the duplicates may finally result in subfunctionalization or neofunctionalization, suggesting different functions or silencing of one copy (Liu et al., 2011), or similar expression levels in developmental stages or tissues implying functional conservation (Li et al., 2012; Zhang and Ma, 2012).


We identified 189 AAT genes in soybean by means of a genome-wide analysis. The soybean genome had more AAT genes than the genomes of Arabidopsis (63) or rice (85). The great expansion of the AAT genes in soybean is probably the result of WGD and tandomly duplications that occurred during evolutionary history of the family Fabaceae. We have presented an overview of the chromosomal distributions, gene structures, duplication patterns, phylogeny, and conserved motifs in soybean AATs. Additionally, we have annotated AAT genes in soybean based on data from the rice and Arabidopsis genomes and we have comprehensively assessed expression patterns of AATs in specific soybean tissues. Our study provides a comprehensive framework for future studies of AAT genes in soybeans.

Author Contributions

LC, YW, and LW designed the whole experiments; LC and HY wrote the manuscript; RR analyzed the soybean genome data and constructed the AAT phylogenetic trees; SZ and YH annotated the AAT genes on chromosomes and calculated the duplication date; QZ and DK analyzed the expression data.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


This work was supported by grants from the Education Department of Henan Province Science and Technology Research Projects (No. 12B180032, No. 14A180033), the National Natural Science Funds of China (No. 31400213, No.U1404319), the National Key Project for Research on Transgenic Biology in China (2014ZX0800921B-001) for YW. This work was also supported by the foundation and frontier technology research of Henan Province (No. 162300410257), the industry-university-research cooperation of Henan Province (No. 162107000032).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:

Table S1. The general information and sequence characterization of 189 GmAAT genes.

Table S2. The expression data of GmAAT genes in various organs.

Figure S1. Phylogenetic tree of the nucleotide sequences of AAT genes in soybean.

Figure S2. Phylogenetic tree of the nucleotide sequences of AAT genes in soybean and Arabidopsis.


Bhattacharjee, A., Ghangal, R., Garg, R., and Jain, M. (2015). Genome-wide analysis of homeobox gene family in legumes: identification, gene duplication and expression profiling. PLoS ONE 10:e0119198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L., Ortiz-Lopez, A., Jung, A., and Bush, D. R. (2001). ANT1, an aromatic and neutral amino acid transporter in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 125, 1813–1820. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.4.1813

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Couturier, J., de Faÿ, E., Fitz, M., Wipf, D., Blaudez, D., and Chalot, M. (2010). PtAAP11, a high affinity amino acid transporter specifically expressed in differentiating xylem cells of poplar. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 1671–1682. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, H., Yang, S.-S., Liang, Z., Feng, B.-R., Liu, L., Huang, Y.-B., et al. (2012). Genome-wide analysis of the MYB transcription factor superfamily in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 12:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duarte, J. M., Cui, L., Wall, P. K., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X., Leebens-Mack, J., et al. (2006). Expression pattern shifts following duplication indicative of subfunctionalization and neofunctionalization in regulatory genes of Arabidopsis. Mol. Bio. Evol. 23, 469–478. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dündar, E., and Bush, D. R. (2009). BAT1, a bidirectional amino acid transporter in Arabidopsis. Planta 229, 1047–1056. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-0892-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Edgar, R. C. (2004). MUCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, J., Meyer, C. A., Wang, Q., Liu, J. S., Liu, X. S., and Zhang, Y. (2012). GFOLD: a generalized fold change for ranking differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 28, 2782–2788. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts515

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fischer, W. N., Loo, D. D., Koch, W., Ludewig, U., Boorer, K. J., Tegeder, M., et al. (2002). Low and high affinity amino acid H+-cotransporters for cellular import of neutral and charged amino acids. Plant J. 29, 717–731. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01248.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grallath, S., Weimar, T., Meyer, A., Gumy, C., Suter-Grotemeyer, M., Neuhaus J. M., et al. (2005). The AtProT family. Compatible solute transporters with similar substrate specificity but differential expression patterns. Plant Physiol. 137, 117–126. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.055079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grant, D., Nelson, R. T., Cannon, S. B., and Shoemaker, R. C. (2010). SoyBase, the USDA-ARS soybean genetics and genomics database. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 843–846. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp798

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hudson, K. A., and Hudson, M. E. (2015). A classification of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors of soybean. Int. J. Genomics. 2015:603182. doi: 10.1155/2015/603182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hunt, E., Gattolin, S., Newbury, H. J., Bale, J. S., Tseng, H. M., Barrett, D. A., et al. (2010). A mutation in amino acid permease AAP6 reduces the amino acid content of the Arabidopsis sieve elements but leaves aphid herbivores unaffected. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 55–64. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp274

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Innan, H., and Kondrashov, F. (2010). The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 97–108. doi: 10.1038/nrg2689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Javelle, M., Klein-Cosson, C., Vernoud, V., Boltz, V., Maher, C., Timmermans, M., et al. (2011). Genome-wide characterization of the HD-ZIP IV transcription factor family in maize: preferential expression in the epidermis. Plant Physiol. 157, 790–803. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.182147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Juretic, N., Hoen, D. R., Huynh, M. L., Harrison, P. M., and Bureau, T. E. (2005). The evolutionary fate of MULE-mediated duplications of host gene fragments in rice. Genome Res. 15, 1292–1297. doi: 10.1101/gr.4064205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koch, W., Kwart, M., Laubner, M., Heineke, D., Stransky, H., Frommer, W. B., et al. (2003). Reduced amino acid content in transgenic potato tubers due to antisense inhibition of the leaf H+/amino acid symporter StAAP1. Plant J. 33, 211–220. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01618.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kong, H., Landherr, L. L., Frohlich, M. W., Leebens-Mack, J., Ma, H., and de Pamphilis, C. W. (2007). Patterns of gene duplication in the plant SKP1 gene family in angiosperms: evidence for multiple mechanisms of rapid gene birth. Plant J. 50, 873–885. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03097.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, Y. H., Foster, J., Chen, J., Voll, L. M., Weber, A. P., and Tegeder, M. (2007). AAP1 transports uncharged amino acids into roots of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 50, 305–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03045.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lehmann, S., Funck, D., Szabados, L., and Rentsch, D. (2010). Proline metabolism and transport in plant development. Amino. Acids 39, 949–962. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0525-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lehmann, S., Gumy, C., Blatter, E., Boeffel, S., Fricke, W., and Rentsch, D. (2011). In planta function of compatible solute transporters of the AtProT family. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 787–796. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq320

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Zhou, S. L., Ma, H., and Zhang, L. S. (2012). Expansion and diversification of the SET domain gene family following whole-genome duplications in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Evol. Biol. 12:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-51

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W. H., Gojobori, T., and Nei, M. (1981). Pseudogenes as a paradigm of neutral evolution. Nature 292, 237–239. doi: 10.1038/292237a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H. J., Tang, Z. X., Han, X. M., Yang, Z. L., Zhang, F. M., Yang, H. L., et al. (2015). Divergence in enzymatic activities in the soybean GST supergene family provides new insight into the evolutionary dynamics of whole-genome duplicates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 2844–2859. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S. L., Baute, G. J., and Adams, K. L. (2011). Organ and cell type-specific complementary expression patterns and regulatory neofunctionalization between duplicated genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 1419–1436. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., and Bush, D. R. (2006). Expression and transcriptional regulation of amino acid transporters in plants. Amino Acids 30, 113–120. doi: 10.1007/s00726-005-0248-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lynch, M., and Conery, J. S. (2000). The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151–1155. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marchant, A., Bhalerao, R., Casimiro, I., Eklöf, J., Casero, P. J., Bennett, M., et al. (2002). AUX1 promotes lateral root formation by facilitating indole-3-acetic acid distribution between sink and source tissues in the Arabidopsis seedling. Plant Cell 14, 589–597. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marchant, A., Kargul, J., May, S. T., Muller, P., Delbarre, A., Perrot-Rechenmann, C., et al. (1999). AUX1 regulates root gravitropism in Arabidopsis by facilitating auxin uptake within root apical tissues. EMBO 18, 2066–2073. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.8.2066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Michaeli, S., Fait, A., Lagor, K., Nunes-Nesi, A., Grillich, N., et al. (2011). A mitochondrial GABA permease connects the GABA shunt and the TCA cycle, and is essential for normal carbon metabolism. Plant J. 67, 485–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04612.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miranda, M., Borisjuk, L., Tewes, A., Heim, U., Sauer, N., Wobus, U., et al. (2001). Amino acid permeases in developing seeds of Vicia faba L.: expression precedes storage protein synthesis and is regulated by amino acid supply. Plant J. 28, 61–71. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01129.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okumoto, S., and Pilot, G. (2011). Amino acid export in plants: a missing link in nitrogen cycling. Mol. Plant 4, 453–463. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssr003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okumoto, S., Koch, W., Tegeder, M., Fischer, W. N., Biehl, A., Leister, D., et al. (2004). Root phloem-specific expression of the plasma membrane amino acid proton cotransporter AAP3. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 2155–2168. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh233

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okumoto, S., Schmidt, R., Tegeder, M., Fischer, W. N., Rentsch, D., Frommer, W. B., et al. (2002). High affinity amino acid transporters specifically expressed in xylem parenchyma and developing seeds of Arabidopsis. J. Bio. Chem. 277, 45338–45346. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207730200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortiz-Lopez, A., Chang, H., and Bush, D. R. (2000). Amino acid transporters in plants. BBA-Biomembranes 1465, 275–280. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(00)00144-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, B., Kong, H., Li, Y., Wang, L., Zhong, M., Sun, L., et al. (2014). OsAAP6 functions as an important regulator of grain protein content and nutritional quality in rice. Nat. Commun. 5:4847. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5847

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, C., Cheng, L. M., Shen, J. Q., Zhang, Y. H., Cao, H. M., Lu, D., et al. (2016). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the 14-3-3 family genes in Medicago truncatula. Front. Plant Sci. 7:320. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00320

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rentsch, D., Boorer, K. J., and Frommer, W. B. (1998). Structure and function of plasma membrane amino acid, oligopeptide and sucrose transporters from higher plants. J. Membrane Biol. 162, 177–190. doi: 10.1007/s002329900355

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rentsch, D., Schmidt, S., and Tegeder, M. (2007). Transporters for uptake and allocation of organic nitrogen compounds in plants. FEBS Lett. 581, 2281–2289. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rolletschek, H., Hosein, F., Miranda, M., Heim, U., Götz, K. P., Schlereth, A., et al. (2005). Ectopic expression of an amino acid transporter (VfAAP1) in seeds of Vicia narbonensis and pea increases storage proteins. Plant Physiol. 4, 1236–1249. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.056523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saier, M. H. Jr., Yen, M. R., Noto, K., Tamang, D. G., and Elkan, C. (2009). The transporter classification database: recent advances. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 274–278. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn862

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanders, A., Collier, R., Trethewy, A., Gould, G., Sieker, R., and Tegeder, M. (2009). AAP1 regulates import of amino acids into developing Arabidopsis embryos. Plant J. 59, 540–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03890.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmidt, R., Stransky, H., and Koch, W. (2007). The amino acid permease AAP8 is important for early seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 226, 805–813. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0527-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmutz, J., Cannon, S. B., Schlueter, J., Ma, J., Mitros, T., Nelson, W., et al. (2010). Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463, 178–183. doi: 10.1038/nature08670

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwacke, R., Grallath, S., Breitkreuz, K. E., Stransky, E., Stransky, H., Frommer, W. B., et al. (1999). LeProT1, a transporter for proline, glycine betaine, and gamma-amino butyric acid in tomato pollen. Plant Cell 11, 377–392. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.3.377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Serrano, R. (1996). Salt tolerance in plants and microorganisms: toxicity targets and defense responses. Int. Rev. Cytol. 165, 1–52. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62219-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shoemaker, R. C., Polzin, K., Labate, J., Specht, J., Brummer, E. C., Olson, T., et al. (1996). Genome duplication in soybean (Glycine subgenus soja). Genetics 144, 329–338.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Shu, Y. J., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Song, L. L., and Guo, C. H. (2016). Genome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF superfamily genes and their responses to abiotic stress in Medicago truncatula. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1247. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stamatakis, A. (2014). RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Su, Y. H., Frommer, W. B., and Ludewig, U. (2004). Molecular and functional characterization of a family of amino acid transporters from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 136, 3104–3113. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.045278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Swarup, K., Benkova, E., Swarup, R., Casimiro, I., Pe'ret, B., Yang, Y., et al. (2008). The auxin influx carrier LAX3 promotes lateral root emergence. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 946–954. doi: 10.1038/ncb1754

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., and Kumar, S. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Tardieu, F., and Simonneau, T. (1998). Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 419–432. doi: 10.1093/jxb/49.Special_Issue.419

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tegeder, M. (2012). Transporters for amino acids in plant cells: some functions and many unknowns. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 315–321. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ugartechea-Chirino, Y., Swarup, R., Swarup, K., Péret, B., Whitworth, M., Bennett, M., et al. (2010). The AUX1 LAX family of auxin influx carriers is required for the establishment of embryonic root cell organization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ann. Bot. 105, 277–289. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp287

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Cao, C., Ma, Q., Zeng, Q., Wang, H., Cheng, Z., et al. (2014). RNA-seq analyses of multiple meristems of soybean: novel and alternative transcripts, evolutionary and functional implications. BMC Plant Biol. 14:169. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Deng, D., Shi, Y., Miao, N., Bian, Y., and Yin, Z. (2012). Diversification, phylogeny and evolution of auxin response factor (ARF) family: insights gained from analyzing maize ARF genes. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39, 2401–2415. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-0991-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y. D., Hammes, U. Z., Taylor, C. G., Schachtman, D. P., and Nielsen, E. (2006). Highaffinity auxin transport by the AUX1 influx carrier protein. Curr. Biol. 16, 1123–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L. S., and Ma, H. (2012). Complex evolutionary history and diverse domain organization of SET proteins suggest divergent regulatory interactions. New Phytol. 1, 248–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04143.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Tan, Q., Lee, R., Trethewy, A., Lee, Y. H., and Tegeder, M. (2010). Altered xylem-phloem transfer of amino acids affects metabolism and leads to increased seed yield and oil content in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22, 3603–3620. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.073833

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Zhao, H. K., Dong, Q., Zhang, Y. Y., Wang, Y. M., Li, H. Y., et al. (2015). Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling under heat and drought treatments of HSP70 gene family in soybean (Glycine max L.). Front. Plant Sci. 6:773. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, H., Ma, H., Yu, L., Wang, X., and Zhao, J. (2012). Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of amino acid transporter gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE 7:e49210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, F., Guo, Y., and Qiu, L. J. (2016). Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analysis of leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase genesin soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 1:58. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0744-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Keywords: soybean (Glycine max L.), AAT gene family, genome-wide analysis, phylogeny, gene structure, expression pattern

Citation: Cheng L, Yuan H-Y, Ren R, Zhao S-Q, Han Y-P, Zhou Q-Y, Ke D-X, Wang Y-X and Wang L (2016) Genome-Wide Identification, Classification, and Expression Analysis of Amino Acid Transporter Gene Family in Glycine Max. Front. Plant Sci. 7:515. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00515

Received: 20 November 2015; Accepted: 01 April 2016;
Published: 20 April 2016.

Edited by:

Henry T. Nguyen, University of Missouri, USA

Reviewed by:

Sachiko Narita Isobe, Kazusa DNA Research Institute, Japan
Liangsheng Zhang, Tongji University, China

Copyright © 2016 Cheng, Yuan, Ren, Zhao, Han, Zhou, Ke, Wang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ying-Xiang Wang,;
Lei Wang,