Mini Review ARTICLE
Common Bean: A Legume Model on the Rise for Unraveling Responses and Adaptations to Iron, Zinc, and Phosphate Deficiencies
- 1Plant Sciences, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
- 2Laboratorio de Genómica Funcional de Leguminosas, FES Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) was domesticated ∼8000 years ago in the Americas and today is a staple food worldwide. Besides caloric intake, common bean is also an important source of protein and micronutrients and it is widely appreciated in developing countries for their affordability (compared to animal protein) and its long storage life. As a legume, common bean also has the economic and environmental benefit of associating with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, thus reducing the use of synthetic fertilizers, which is key for sustainable agriculture. Despite significant advances in the plant nutrition field, the mechanisms underlying the adaptation of common bean to low nutrient input remains largely unknown. The recent release of the common bean genome offers, for the first time, the possibility of applying techniques and approaches that have been exclusive to model plants to study the adaptive responses of common bean to challenging environments. In this review, we discuss the hallmarks of common bean domestication and subsequent distribution around the globe. We also discuss recent advances in phosphate, iron, and zinc homeostasis, as these nutrients often limit plant growth, development, and yield. In addition, iron and zinc are major targets of crop biofortification to improve human nutrition. Developing common bean varieties able to thrive under nutrient limiting conditions will have a major impact on human nutrition, particularly in countries where dry beans are the main source of carbohydrates, protein and minerals.
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max) are two of the most important sources of protein for humans and livestock. Both legumes have fascinating domestication and diversification histories and today, both are critical pillars of the worldwide economy (Figure 1). At the same time, common bean and soybean have different properties that make them attractive to different markets and consumers. For instance, in the USA, Brazil, Argentina, and China, soybean is processed for its protein and oil into a variety of products including food for humans and livestock, cooking oil, and even biofuels. In contrast, common bean is a staple food that does not require any industrial processing; it is the most important protein source in the developing world and, besides the caloric intake, common bean also provides minerals, fiber, thiamine, folate, and phytochemicals with analgesic and neuroprotective properties (Blair et al., 2013; Jha et al., 2015; USDA Nutrient Database release1 19). In 2010, the soybean genome was released allowing the use of sophisticated and elegant molecular tools to study processes that are unique to legumes, such as symbiotic interactions. In 2014, the genome of common bean became available, offering a unique opportunity to compare and understand, at the molecular level, the similarities and differences that make these species so unique and important for human nutrition around the globe. In this mini-review, we briefly recapitulate the history of domestication and distribution of common bean around the world. We also discuss recent advances in phosphate, iron, and zinc metabolism, which are nutrients known to limit plant growth, development and yield. Developing common bean varieties more resilient to nutritional deficiencies will have a major impact on human nutrition, particularly in countries where dry beans are an affordable source of carbohydrates, protein and minerals.
FIGURE 1. Domestication, distribution, and production of common bean worldwide. (A) Geographic distribution of common bean following domestication. Insert photo show the natural diversity in common bean in terms of shape, size, and color (Photo by Carlos Adampol Galindo). (B) Common bean production (million tons) worldwide in the last decade shows that Africa had the fastest growth. Graph was created using data available at http://faostat3.fao.org. (C) Common bean association with symbiotic mycorrhizae and N2-fixating bacteria facilitates P uptake and N assimilation. Bottom: for comparison, Phaseolus vulgaris proteins with the highest identity, at the amino acid level, to known regulators and transporters of P, Fe, and Zn uptake in Arabidopsis are shown (see text and Table 1 for additional details).
Economic Importance of Legumes
Crops are susceptible to biotic and abiotic stresses and depending on the severity of the stress and the plant’s ability to tolerate them, yield could be severely affected. In 2012, the production of soybean and corn in the US was reduced by 10 and 28%, respectively, due to a severe drought2. On the other hand, pests and nutritional deficiencies have been tackled by an intensive use of fertilizers and pesticides. While this is a short-term solution, the real task for farmers and scientists is to provide food of high nutritional quality compatible with sustainable agricultural practices (Foley et al., 2011). Legumes such as soybean and common bean have the ability to establish symbiotic associations with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Rhizobia) and with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AM) to facilitate the acquisition of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous (Figure 1; Vance, 2001; Venkateshwaran et al., 2013). These symbiotic relationships are economically important because they reduce dramatically the use of synthetic fertilizers and the release of their byproduct N2O, a major greenhouse gas. It has been estimated that legumes fix 60 million metric tons of nitrogen worldwide (Smil, 1999) and, replacing this biofixed nitrogen with synthetic fertilizers would cost around $40 US billion (109) dollars. Therefore, understanding and improving these symbiotic associations could have major economic, environmental, and nutritional benefits.
Genetic Diversity in Common Bean and Genome Hallmarks
Common bean was domesticated ∼8000 years ago in central Mexico and South America (Figure 1A). These were individual events and resulted in two major genetic pools, the Mesoamerican, covering from northern Mexico to Colombia, and the Andean, extending from Peru to Argentina (Gepts, 1998; Rodriguez et al., 2015). Dried beans from both genetic pools were brought to the Iberian peninsula from the Americas about 500 years ago and distributed to the rest of Europe, Africa, and Asia shortly after (Figure 1A; Santalla et al., 2002, 2010; Angioi et al., 2010). Phaseolin, which accounts for 90% of the seed protein, together with additional molecular and microsatellite markers, have been key to establish the relationship between cultivars, their original genetic pool, and the reduction in the molecular diversity specific to different regions (Gepts, 1998; Broughton et al., 2003; Rodriguez et al., 2015). For example, genetic analysis of European cultivars has showed a higher ratio of Andean/Mesoamerican diversity across the continent (Angioi et al., 2010) while in China is the Mesoamerican varieties the most represented. In Africa, there is a mixed abundance of both pools depending on the region (Blair et al., 2010). This vast geographical distribution around the world and the wealth of traits selected over centuries is the result of farming under different environments and the specific needs and preferences of different communities.
Interestingly, the production of dried beans over the last 10 years has increased 29%, for a total of 22 million tons in3 2013. Notably, among all continents, Africa was the one who showed the highest growth in production (75%), compared to Asia (33%) or the Americas (6%; Figure 1B). This data trend emphasizes the importance of developing better, more resilient, high-yielding varieties of common bean to mitigate the threat of food insecurity. Breeding programs have been very successful at improving varieties in a location-specific manner and the recent release of a second common bean genome (Mesoamerican BAT93) will likely provide additional information about traits retained in specific geographical regions and their role in adaptation to different environments (Vlasova et al., 2016).
Common bean has a lower genetic complexity relative to soybean. It is known that both species shared a whole-genome duplication (WGD) event about 19 million years ago (Lavin et al., 2005; Schmutz et al., 2010). However, soybean went through a second WGD event 10 million years ago, making soybean a partial diploidized tetraploid. This extra WGD is evident by the number of loci present across the genome and within specific gene families (Table 1), thus complicating genetic analyses and mutant identification due to functional redundancies. Synteny analysis, however, showed that most of the common bean genome has counterparts in the soybean genome (Schmutz et al., 2014), opening the possibility to investigate processes in common bean and later pursue cross-species comparisons between these two legumes. Moreover, the comparison of the Andean and the recently released Mesoamerican genome has initially revealed interesting differences. For example, the size and the number of genes in the Mesoamerican genome is 7% smaller (549.6 Mb vs 587 Mb) than the Andean genome. BAT93 has only 30,491 predicted loci, while G19833 has 31,638 (Vlasova et al., 2016). The lower complexity of common bean compared to soybean and the novel genetic information available for the Andean and Mesoamerican pools make common bean an enticing model to characterize molecular processes such as symbiosis and adaptation to nutritional deficiencies.
TABLE 1. Comparison between number of genes and selected functional categories between Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis), Glycine max (soybean), and Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean).
Common Bean Responses to Phosphorous, Iron, and Zinc Deficiencies
The symbiotic association of common bean with rhizobia gives an advantage to acquire atmospheric nitrogen, leaving phosphorous (P) as the major limiting macronutrient for plant growth (Figure 1C). Most of the components of the phosphorus homeostasis network have been identified in different plants, including common bean (Valdes-Lopez et al., 2008; Lopez-Arredondo et al., 2014). P deficiency promotes changes in root architecture, root exploration capacity and the symbiotic associations with the soil microbiome (Lopez-Arredondo et al., 2014). During P deprivation, common bean is able to use internal phosphate sources like phospholipids, nucleic acids, and ATP (Valdes-Lopez et al., 2008; Lopez-Arredondo et al., 2014). In addition, large-scale metabolomic analyses have shown that during P deficiency there is an accumulation and exudation of organic acids and amino acids into the rhizosphere to solubilize P and increase its uptake (Tawaraya et al., 2014). Phosphate is taken up from the soil by plasma membrane high-affinity phosphate transporters (Pht), which are induced under P deficiency (Valdes-Lopez et al., 2008; Lopez-Arredondo et al., 2014) and remobilized from the plasma membrane when P levels are restored (Bayle et al., 2011). Transcriptomic and metabolite profiling have identified more than 100 genes regulated by P availability in roots and nodules from common bean (Hernandez et al., 2009) and transcription factors such as PHR1 or TIFY, the microRNA PvmiR399 and photosynthates have been identified as part of the P deprivation signaling pathway (Pant et al., 2008; Valdes-Lopez et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010; Aparicio-Fabre et al., 2013). Shoot-to-root communication is also critical to sense the P status at the whole plant level and it has been suggested that sugars might act as systemic signal molecules that relay information to roots about the plant P status (Liu et al., 2010). Legume–Rhizobium interactions are also important in the context of P homeostasis. In nodules, the P concentration is higher than the rest of the plant, even under P stress, suggesting that nodules play a major role regulating the C/N flux between the plant and the bacteria (Hernandez et al., 2009). In this regard, the transcription factors NF-YC1 and AP2, and the microRNA miR172 were found to regulate the Rhizobia symbiosis, paving the road for improving N-fixation in common bean (Nova-Franco et al., 2015), while optimizing P uptake simultaneously. Other associations such as endomycorrhizal symbiosis (Figure 1C) seem to facilitate P assimilation, but the molecular mechanisms regulating this interaction are still largely unknown in common bean.
Micronutrient deficiencies, particularly Fe and Zn, affect over 30% of the world’s population4. These essential minerals are required in several metabolic processes. For example, in humans, iron is needed to synthesize hemoglobin, hormones, and connective tissue; while zinc is required as an enzyme co-factor, for immunity, protein synthesis, DNA synthesis, and cell division. Women, particularly pregnant woman, and children in developing countries are particularly at risk due to poor micronutrient intake. Common bean is a staple food in developing countries and also a good source for these minerals having more iron (around 55 μg/g) and zinc (around 35 μg/g) than cereals (Beebe et al., 2000a). Although there is some correlation between Fe and Zn across common bean cultivars (Hoppler et al., 2014), the Andean pool seem to have higher concentration of Fe (Beebe et al., 2000b) while the Mesoamerican beans have higher zinc content (Islam et al., 2002). These essential nutrients are taken up from the rhizosphere by transporters that have already been identified and characterized (Table 1). However, even in the model plant Arabidopsis, the transporters responsible for the mobilization and loading of nutrients into seeds remain largely unknown. Fe and Zn deficiency in plants is caused by low availability or solubility of these elements in the soil. In Strategy I plants, like common bean, release of protons by the H+ATPases, specially AHA2, induces an acidification of the rhizosphere, which in turn promotes the solubilization of Fe and Zn thus facilitating their uptake (Guerinot and Yi, 1994; Marschner and Romheld, 1994; Sinclair and Kramer, 2012). Both, Fe and Zn are taken up by IRT-like transporters (Hindt and Guerinot, 2012; Sinclair and Kramer, 2012) and then mobilized to the shoots via the xylem. Source-to-sink transport on the other hand, including nutrient delivery to developing tissues including seeds, occurs exclusively via the phloem (Mendoza-Cozatl et al., 2011; Khan et al., 2014). Surprisingly, little is known about how Fe and Zn are sensed in plants. But downstream transcriptional regulators for both elements have been identified in Arabidopsis. Up regulation of the Fe uptake machinery is under the control of two major transcriptional networks, the FIT (At2g28160) network and the PYE (At3g47640) network, while Zn uptake during Zn deprivation requires two bZIP transcription factors, bZIP19 and bZIP23 (Hindt and Guerinot, 2012; Sinclair and Kramer, 2012). An additional protein localized in the phloem, OPT3, has been identified as a component of the shoot-to-root signaling network relaying the information of the Fe status in leaves to roots (Mendoza-Cozatl et al., 2014; Zhai et al., 2014). Interestingly, since Fe and Zn share the same transporters to enter the root, mutants with impaired systemic signaling (opt3 mutants) over accumulate Fe and Zn in roots and leaves (Mendoza-Cozatl et al., 2014; Zhai et al., 2014). Moreover, the common bean genome contains putative homologs for all the components of these networks (Phvul.005G130500/FIT1-like; Phvul.002G099700/IRT1-like; Phvul.003G086500/OPT3-like; Phvul.011G035700/bZIP23-like), suggesting that current advances in trace metal homeostasis in Arabidopsis could have a direct translational impact in common bean and could lead to an increased allocation and retention of Fe and Zn in the edible plant tissues.
Biofortification in common bean needs an adequate partitioning of Fe and Zn between plant tissues. Breeding approaches have already achieved Fe concentrations in beans of up to 94 μg/g (Petry et al., 2015); however, the underlying molecular mechanisms behind this feat are unknown. Natural variation plays a major role in identifying and breeding desirable traits into varieties amenable to specific climates. In seeds, Fe is stored in ferritin complexes (Theil, 2003), thus ferritin has been the focus for Fe biofortification in other plant species. But only a portion of the iron in ferritin is bioavailable; therefore, alternative strategies to accumulate Fe in bioavailable forms are currently being investigated (Hoppler et al., 2014). Among them are small Fe and Zn binding molecules such as nicotianamine and organic acids found in vacuoles like malate and citrate. Another target has been to reduce anti-nutrients like phytic acid and polyphenols, which bind to Fe and Zn thus inhibiting their absorption (Clemens, 2014; Petry et al., 2015). An additional challenge is to have an increase in Fe and Zn levels without compromising the content of other nutrients or increasing the uptake of non-essential toxic elements such as Cd and Ni. These elements can occur naturally in trace amounts but these elements use the Fe/Zn uptake mechanism (IRT1-mediated) to enter the roots (Mendoza-Cozatl et al., 2011; Khan et al., 2014).
Opportunities to Maximize Nutrient Acquisition in Common Bean
Arabidopsis thaliana was originally selected as a model plant based on its relatively small genome. Arabidopsis has been, over the last 20 years, the go-to model to characterize genes and assign putative functions to more than 35,000 hypothetical proteins encoded by 27,000+ loci. Arabidopsis has been key to understand complex molecular processes in plants, and the advances achieved so far have been extraordinary in terms of mechanistic details. Surprisingly, the number of genes (loci) in common bean is not significantly different than Arabidopsis (Table 1) and the number of members within gene families – from specific transporters, to signaling proteins and transcription factors – is pretty close between these two species. These similarities suggest that it is feasible to use the accumulated knowledge in Arabidopsis as a bona fide reference to explore processes of specific interest in common bean (e.g., nutrient uptake and allocation) but also to start unraveling the molecular basis of processes more unique to legumes (e.g., nodulation). In addition, the Arabidopsis genome can also be used as a “contrasting reference” to explore additional symbiotic interactions, particularly with AM fungi. Comparative phylogenomic analyses have found that Arabidopsis, together with a handful of other species, has lost some of the genes required to establish successful interactions with AM. The molecular basis for this loss is unclear but it has been suggested that the emergence of new traits allowing a more efficient nutrient uptake decreased the selection pressure to maintain genes critical for symbiosis with AM (Delaux et al., 2014).
An important yet less fortunate difference between Arabidopsis and common bean is the current difficulty to stably transform common bean and modify gene expression (either over expression or silencing). Therefore, transformation in common bean is mostly limited to hairy roots; that is, genes can be successfully over expressed or silenced but only in root tissues and within one generation. Nevertheless, hairy root transformation is efficient enough to enable functional genetic approaches (Estrada-Navarrete et al., 2007), including the use of artificial microRNAs to silence simultaneously several genes within a gene family.
Another key resource available to help identifying genes and networks expressed in a tissue-specific manner is the P. vulgaris Gene Expression Atlas database5 (O’Rourke et al., 2014). This database contains expression profiles, obtained by RNA-seq using the variety Negro Jamapa, from seven tissues including roots, nodules, stems, flowers, leaves, pods, and seeds throughout development. These bioinformatic resources are critical to integrate transcriptional programs in complex organisms subject to specific developmental programs, like plants. Since gene annotation and assignment of protein function is an ongoing process, tissue-specific datasets are extremely useful to narrow down candidate genes for further studies. For instance, once a transporter gene is suspected to mediate the mobilization of nutrients into seeds, based on homology to other nutrient transporters and its unique expression at seed-filling stages, this protein can be cloned and expressed in heterologous systems (e.g., yeast or oocytes) for a detailed biochemical characterization including substrate specificity (Mendoza-Cozatl et al., 2014; Zhai et al., 2014).
Perhaps, one of the most breakthrough technologies brought to the plant field in the last decade is the tag-based immunoprecipitation of translating ribosomes (or TRAP). This technique recovers mRNA associated to ribosomes to assess changes in gene translation (translatome analyses). Due to transgenic nature of this approach (i.e., the tag used for immunoprecipitation is fused to the ribosome by standard cloning), tissue-specific promoters can be used to drive the expression of the tagged ribosome in specific tissues, making translatome analysis the method of choice to identify genes being translated in specific cells or tissues. The TRAP technique has recently been adapted to legumes and will likely advance our understanding of molecular processes at cell- and tissue-specific resolution (Castro-Guerrero et al., 2016). The availability of the common bean genome is also facilitating other –omic techniques including epigenomics (Kim et al., 2015), small RNA and degradome sequencing (Formey et al., 2015) and will likely enable proteomic studies in the near future.
Perspectives and Conclusion
The recent release of the Andean and Mesoamerican common bean genomes is enabling a new wave of cutting-edge research, including epigenomics and translatome analyses, in a crop that has fed billions of people for more than 5000 years. The tools developed in other crops to harness the power of natural diversity will play a major role at identifying traits needed to overcome biotic and abiotic stresses. These are exciting times for a field that has the potential to reduce the threat of food insecurity by engineering crops tolerant to biotic and abiotic stresses, increasing yields and enhancing the nutritional quality of dried beans.
DM-C, and OV-L conceived the idea. NC-G, MI-A, DM-C, and OV-L performed the bibliographic survey. NC-G, MI-A, DM-C, and OV-L wrote the paper.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
This work was supported by a grant from the US National Science Foundation (IOS-1252706 to DM-C). Dr. Norma Castro-Guerrero is supported through a NSF EPSCoR Track II award (IIA-1430428). OV-L is supported by two grants from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT Ciencia Básica #219759 and CONACyT Fortalecimiento y Desarrollo de la Infraestructura Científica y Tecnológica #252260), by a grant from Programa de Apoyo de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT #IA203815) and by a grant from PAPCA-FES Iztacala (FESI-DIP-PAPCA-2014-3).
Angioi, S. A., Rau, D., Attene, G., Nanni, L., Bellucci, E., Logozzo, G., et al. (2010). Beans in Europe: origin and structure of the European landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121, 829–843. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1353-2
Aparicio-Fabre, R., Guillen, G., Loredo, M., Arellano, J., Valdes-Lopez, O., Ramirez, M., et al. (2013). Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) PvTIFY orchestrates global changes in transcript profile response to jasmonate and phosphorus deficiency. BMC Plant Biol. 13:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-26
Bayle, V., Arrighi, J. F., Creff, A., Nespoulous, C., Vialaret, J., Rossignol, M., et al. (2011). Arabidopsis thaliana high-affinity phosphate transporters exhibit multiple levels of posttranslational regulation. Plant Cell 23, 1523–1535. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.081067
Beebe, S., Skroch, P. W., Tohme, J., Duque, M. C., Pedraza, F., and Nienhuis, J. (2000b). Structure of genetic diversity among common bean landraces of Middle American origin based on correspondence analysis of RAPD. Crop Sci. 40, 264–273. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.401264x
Blair, M. W., Gonzalez, L. F., Kimani, P. M., and Butare, L. (2010). Genetic diversity, inter-gene pool introgression and nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Central Africa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121, 237–248. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1305-x
Blair, M. W., Izquierdo, P., Astudillo, C., and Grusak, M. A. (2013). A legume biofortification quandary: variability and genetic control of seed coat micronutrient accumulation in common beans. Front. Plant Sci. 4:275. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00275
Castro-Guerrero, N. A., Cui, Y., and Mendoza-Cozatl, D. (2016). Purification of translating ribosomes and associated mRNAs from soybean (Glycine max). Curr. Protoc. Plant Biol. 1, 1–12. doi: 10.1002/cppb.20011
Delaux, P. M., Varala, K., Edger, P. P., Coruzzi, G. M., Pires, J. C., and Ane, J. M. (2014). Comparative phylogenomics uncovers the impact of symbiotic associations on host genome evolution. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004487
Estrada-Navarrete, G., Alvarado-Affantranger, X., Olivares, J. E., Guillen, G., Diaz-Camino, C., Campos, F., et al. (2007). Fast, efficient and reproducible genetic transformation of Phaseolus spp. by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1819–1824. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.259
Formey, D., Iniguez, L. P., Pelaez, P., Li, Y. F., Sunkar, R., Sanchez, F., et al. (2015). Genome-wide identification of the Phaseolus vulgaris sRNAome using small RNA and degradome sequencing. BMC Genomics 16:423. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1639-5
Hernandez, G., Valdes-Lopez, O., Ramirez, M., Goffard, N., Weiller, G., Aparicio-Fabre, R., et al. (2009). Global changes in the transcript and metabolic profiles during symbiotic nitrogen fixation in phosphorus-stressed common bean plants. Plant Physiol. 151, 1221–1238. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.143842
Hoppler, M., Egli, I., Petry, N., Gille, D., Zeder, C., Walczyk, T., et al. (2014). Iron speciation in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) biofortified by common breeding. J. Food Sci. 79, C1629–C1634. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12548
Islam, F. M. A., Basford, K. E., Jara, C., Redden, R. J., and Beebe, S. (2002). Seed compositional and disease resistance differences among gene pools in cultivated common bean. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 49, 285–293. doi: 10.1023/A:1015510428026
Jha, A. B., Ashokkumar, K., Diapari, M., Ambrose, S. J., Zhang, H., Tar’an, B., et al. (2015). Genetic diversity of folate profiles in seeds of common bean, lentil, chickpea and pea. J. Food Composit. Anal. 42, 134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2015.03.006
Khan, M. A., Castro-Guerrero, N., and Mendoza-Cozatl, D. G. (2014). Moving toward a precise nutrition: preferential loading of seeds with essential nutrients over non-essential toxic elements. Front. Plant Sci. 5:51. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00051
Kim, K. D., El Baidouri, M., Abernathy, B., Iwata-Otsubo, A., Chavarro, C., Gonzales, M., et al. (2015). A comparative epigenomic analysis of polyploidy-derived genes in soybean and common bean. Plant Physiol. 168, 1433–1447. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00408
Lavin, M., Herendeen, P. S., and Wojciechowski, M. F. (2005). Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the tertiary. Syst. Biol. 54, 575–594. doi: 10.1080/10635150590947131
Liu, J. Q., Allan, D. L., and Vance, C. P. (2010). Systemic signaling and local sensing of phosphate in common bean: cross-talk between photosynthate and microRNA399. Mol. Plant 3, 428–437. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq008
Lopez-Arredondo, D. L., Leyva-Gonzalez, M. A., Gonzalez-Morales, S. I., Lopez-Bucio, J., and Herrera-Estrella, L. (2014). Phosphate nutrition: improving low-phosphate tolerance in crops. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 95–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035949
Mendoza-Cozatl, D. G., Jobe, T. O., Hauser, F., and Schroeder, J. I. (2011). Long-distance transport, vacuolar sequestration, tolerance, and transcriptional responses induced by cadmium and arsenic. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 554–562. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.07.004
Mendoza-Cozatl, D. G., Xie, Q., Akmakjian, G. Z., Jobe, T. O., Patel, A., Stacey, M. G., et al. (2014). OPT3 is a component of the iron-signaling network between leaves and roots and misregulation of OPT3 leads to an over-accumulation of cadmium in seeds. Mol. Plant 7, 1455–1469. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu067
Nova-Franco, B., Iniguez, L. P., Valdes-Lopez, O., Alvarado-Affantranger, X., Leija, A., Fuentes, S. I., et al. (2015). The micro-RNA72c-APETALA2-1 node as a key regulator of the common bean-Rhizobium etli nitrogen fixation symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 168, 273–291. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.255547
O’Rourke, J. A., Iniguez, L. P., Fu, F., Bucciarelli, B., Miller, S. S., Jackson, S. A., et al. (2014). An RNA-Seq based gene expression atlas of the common bean. BMC Genomics 15:866. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-866
Pant, B. D., Buhtz, A., Kehr, J., and Scheible, W. R. (2008). MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis. Plant J. 53, 731–738. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03363.x
Petry, N., Boy, E., Wirth, J. P., and Hurrell, R. F. (2015). Review: the potential of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) as a vehicle for iron biofortification. Nutrients 7, 1144–1173. doi: 10.3390/nu7021144
Pruneda-Paz, J. L., Breton, G., Nagel, D. H., Kang, S. E., Bonaldi, K., Doherty, C. J., et al. (2014). A genome-scale resource for the functional characterization of Arabidopsis transcription factors. Cell Rep. 8, 622–632. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.033
Rodriguez, M., Rau, D., Bitocchi, E., Bellucci, E., Biagetti, E., Carboni, A., et al. (2015). Landscape genetics, adaptive diversity and population structure in Phaseolus vulgaris. New Phytol. 209, 1781–1794. doi: 10.1111/nph.13713
Santalla, M., De Ron, A. M., and De La Fuente, M. (2010). Integration of genome and phenotypic scanning gives evidence of genetic structure in Mesoamerican common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the southwest of Europe. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120, 1635–1651. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1282-0
Santalla, M., Rodino, P., and De Ron, M. (2002). Allozyme evidence supporting southwestern Europe as a secondary center of genetic diversity for the common bean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104, 934–944. doi: 10.1007/s00122-001-0844-6
Schmutz, J., McClean, P. E., Mamidi, S., Wu, G. A., Cannon, S. B., Grimwood, J., et al. (2014). A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat. Genet. 46, 707–713. doi: 10.1038/ng.3008
Tawaraya, K., Horie, R., Saito, S., Wagatsuma, T., Saito, K., and Oikawa, A. (2014). Metabolite profiling of root exudates of common bean under phosphorus deficiency. Metabolites 4, 599–611. doi: 10.3390/metabo4030599
Valdes-Lopez, O., Arenas-Huertero, C., Ramirez, M., Girard, L., Sanchez, F., Vance, C. P., et al. (2008). Essential role of MYB transcription factor: PvPHR1 and microRNA: PvmiR399 in phosphorus-deficiency signalling in common bean roots. Plant Cell Environ. 31, 1834–1843. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01883.x
Vlasova, A., Capella-Gutierrez, S., Rendon-Anaya, M., Hernandez-Onate, M., Minoche, A. E., Erb, I., et al. (2016). Genome and transcriptome analysis of the Mesoamerican common bean and the role of gene duplications in establishing tissue and temporal specialization of genes. Genome Biol. 17:32. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0883-6
Zhai, Z., Gayomba, S. R., Jung, H. I., Vimalakumari, N. K., Pineros, M., Craft, E., et al. (2014). OPT3 is a phloem-specific iron transporter that is essential for systemic iron signaling and redistribution of iron and cadmium in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26, 2249–2264. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.123737
Keywords: dry beans production, micronutrients, mineral deficiencies, biofortification
Citation: Castro-Guerrero NA, Isidra-Arellano MC, Mendoza-Cozatl DG and Valdés-López O (2016) Common Bean: A Legume Model on the Rise for Unraveling Responses and Adaptations to Iron, Zinc, and Phosphate Deficiencies. Front. Plant Sci. 7:600. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00600
Received: 06 January 2016; Accepted: 18 April 2016;
Published: 03 May 2016.
Edited by:Manuel González-Guerrero, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain
Reviewed by:Michael A. Grusak, USDA-ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center, USA
Antonio M. De Ron, Spanish National Research Council-Misión Biológica de Galicia, Spain
Copyright © 2016 Castro-Guerrero, Isidra-Arellano, Mendoza-Cozatl and Valdés-López. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.