Abstract
Silicon (Si) is the second most abundant element in soil, where its availability to plants can exhilarate to 10% of total dry weight of the plant. Si accumulation/transport occurs in the upward direction, and has been identified in several crop plants. Si application has been known to ameliorate plant growth and development during normal and stressful conditions over past two-decades. During abiotic (salinity, drought, thermal, and heavy metal etc) stress, one of the immediate responses by plant is the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide (), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicals (OH), which cause severe damage to the cell structure, organelles, and functions. To alleviate and repair this damage, plants have developed a complex antioxidant system to maintain homeostasis through non-enzymatic (carotenoids, tocopherols, ascorbate, and glutathione) and enzymatic antioxidants [superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX)]. To this end, the exogenous application of Si has been found to induce stress tolerance by regulating the generation of ROS, reducing electrolytic leakage, and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents, and immobilizing and reducing the uptake of toxic ions like Na, under stressful conditions. However, the interaction of Si and plant antioxidant enzyme system remains poorly understood, and further in-depth analyses at the transcriptomic level are needed to understand the mechanisms responsible for the Si-mediated regulation of stress responses.
Introduction
Silicon (Si) has a strong affinity with oxygen; therefore, it usually exists as silica (SiO2) under natural conditions (Ma and Takahashi, 2002). It also exists in the form of silicic acid [Si(OH)4] and silicate (xOySiO2), depending upon the soil pH (Epstein, 1999). Si accumulation/transport occurs in the upward direction, and has been identified in several crop plants. Si transporter genes have been identified in rice, barley, and maize roots, which facilitate its absorption from the soil to the shoot area. Subsequently, it stimulates various physiological responses such as growth, development, and optimization of enzymatic activities. Si accumulation in plant normally occurs from the root to shoot, and its transport process has been identified in several crops such as rice, maize, and barley (Ma et al., 2006; Mitani et al., 2009; Cooke and Leishman, 2011; Yamaji et al., 2012). Two Si transporter genes were identified by Ma et al. (2006) in rice root and was named as low silicon gene 1 (Lsi1) and low silicon gene 2 (Lsi2). Following this several Si transport genes have been characterized in other corps such as barley (HvLsi1, HvLsi2) and maize (ZmLsi1, ZmLsi2; Ma et al., 2006; Mitani et al., 2009; Yamaji et al., 2012). After the absorption of Si from the soil into the root, it gets translocated to the shoot area, where it can stimulate various physiological responses, such as plant growth and development (Epstein, 1999; Hamayun et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2012; Mateos-Naranjo et al., 2015), enzymatic activity (Epstein, 1999; Liang et al., 2003; Gong et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2014a,b,c; Todorova et al., 2014; Abdel-Haliem et al., 2017), and gene expression (Ma and Yamaji, 2008; Kim et al., 2014a; Vatansever et al., 2017).
To complete a life cycle, plants are continuously exposed to various abiotic stresses and sometime multifaceted stresses. These stresses in turn causing the generation of various reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide (), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), or hydroxyl radicals (OH) in cells (Sharma et al., 2012; Das and Roychoudhury, 2014). These ROS can cause serious oxidative damage to the protein, DNA, and lipids of cell components (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Lobo et al., 2010; Tripathi et al., 2017). Therefore, ROS scavenging is most important defense mechanism to cope with stress condition in plants (Sharma et al., 2012; Baxter et al., 2014; Das and Roychoudhury, 2014). According to previous reports, exogenously Si can improve the ability of ROS scavenging by regulation of antioxidants enzyme activity (Torabi et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2016; Tripathi et al., 2017). Furthermore, regulation pattern across various crop plants is different depending upon the exposure time of the stress (Sharma et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2016). Therefore, here, we discussed various possibilities based on previous literature survey and our understanding the role of Si in modulating antioxidant activities in plants during abiotic stress.
Defense mechanism against ROS generation
In natural conditions, plants continuously produce several ROS during photosynthesis and respiration processes in cell organelles such as mitochondria, chloroplast, and peroxisomes. Thus, plants can maintain homeostasis by two different detoxification mechanisms involving non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants (Mittler, 2002; Arbona et al., 2003; Apel and Hirt, 2004; Sytar et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2017). In plants, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) are the main enzymatic antioxidants, whereas carotenoids, tocopherols, ascorbate, and glutathione are classified as the non-enzymatic antioxidants (Asada, 1999; Racchi, 2013; Kim et al., 2014b,c). Racchi (2013) reported that SOD exists in various forms, such as Cu/ZnSOD, MnSOD, and FeSOD. Depending upon their affinity with the other ions in plants, each SOD are distributed in a different form in various plant organs such as chloroplasts (Cu/ZnSOD, FeSOD), cytosol (Cu/ZnSOD), and mitochondria (MnSOD). Primarily, SOD catalyzes the efficient removal of superoxide free radicals in chloroplasts as they are mainly generated in the photosystem I during the light reaction. CAT is located in the peroxisomes of plant cells, and its main role is the elimination of H2O2, which is produced by the SOD reaction. Another antioxidant, APX, also can remove H2O2; however, it is distributed in the preoxisomes as well as chloroplasts, cytosol, and mitochondrion (Racchi, 2013). Thus, APX can be found in different forms, such as cAPX (cytosol), mitAPX (mitochondria), sAPX (chloroplast stroma), mAPX (peroxisomes and glyoxisomes), and tAPX (chloroplast thylakoids) depending upon its location (Racchi, 2013). In the chloroplast, APX exist as sAPX and tAPX; the ratio of sAPX and tAPX in chloroplast differs according to the plant species and leaf senescence, and reveals different plant sizes (Sun et al., 2010). The cAPX is located in cytosol; thus, its plays a role in the elimination of H2O2, which is generated in cytosol. Therefore, all APXs are different in characteristics such as size, location, role, and amino acid sequences (Caverzan et al., 2012).
Plants can induce defense responses against oxidative stress by activating the non-enzymatic antioxidants, which represent the second line of defense against ROS, hydrophilic molecules (ascorbate, glutathione), and lipophilic metabolites (carotenoids, α-tocopherol; Racchi, 2013; Suzuki et al., 2014; Gowayed et al., 2017) Ascorbate is a water-soluble antioxidant synthesized in mitochondria. It can translocate to other cell compartments by two different pathways. Normally, ascorbate can directly scavenge ROS (1O2, , and OH) in the cell. Furthermore, it is connected with the de-epoxidase enzyme of violaxanthin, and acts as response matrix of APX (Szarka et al., 2013). Due to its various roles, ascorbate is considered as the most powerful antioxidant in the plant cell (Gill and Tuteja, 2010; Racchi, 2013; Suzuki et al., 2014). Glutathione is also an important water-soluble antioxidant, and plays an important role in scavenging 1O2 and OH from chloroplasts (Sharma et al., 2012). In addition, glutathione protects the thiol-groups of enzymes located in the chloroplast stroma and participates in the production of α-tocopherol and ascorbate (Xiang and Oliver, 1998; Hicks et al., 2007; Sharma et al., 2012; Racchi, 2013). Besides its role in detoxification of ROS, glutathione induces physiological responses such as the regulation of sulfur transport and expression of stress defense genes (Noctor et al., 2002; Racchi, 2013). Carotenoids are a class of phenolic compounds distributed in various fruits and vegetables (Racchi, 2013). They can prevent lipid peroxidation by scavenging single oxide radical from chloroplasts (Kühlbrandt et al., 1994). Carotenoids are synthesized in plastids and consist of 40-carbon isoprenoids. According to Lu and Li (2008), carotenoids are classified as carotenes, which include the carbon and hydrogen atoms, and xanthophylls that contain the oxygenated form of carotenes (Wu et al., 2017). The most important role of α-tocopherol is that it can eliminate 1O2, , and OH free radicals, which are generated in the thylakoid membranes; thus, it can prevent lipid peroxidation (Fryer, 1992; Kataria, 2017). α-tocopherol has adequate fluidity, enabling it to move easily within the lipid membrane. Thus, membrane safety is induced by the fluidity of α-tocopherol (Faltin et al., 2010; Racchi, 2013; Figure 1).
Figure 1
Si in ROS scavenging under abiotic stress conditions
The enzymatic/non-enzymatic antioxidants are involved in the removal of ROS either directly (catalases and peroxidases) or indirectly through the regeneration of the two major redox molecules (ascorbate and glutathione) in the cells (Figure 1). Accumulation of these antioxidants suggests a high level of stress convened to the plants (Sharma et al., 2012). This could be also assumed that the plant has defended itself from ROS by producing high amount of antioxidant/enzymes. Accoring to Rouhier and Jacquot (2008), Si application in crops during abiotic stress conditions can regulate ROS generation. Here, we investigated via past and current reports that how antioxidant enzymes could regulate after exogenously Si to different plant species during some of the common abiotic stresses (salinity, drought, temperature, wounding, UV, and heavy metal stress).
Salinity stress
Decrease in water potential due to high concentration of sodium and chloride ions inhibit plant growth and development (Torabi et al., 2015). According to Kim et al. (2014c), the application of Si in rice plants under salinity significantly decreased the activities of non-enzymatic MDA and enzymatic antioxidants POD, PPO, and CAT on the other hands, Torabi et al. (2015) observed that when they applied Si to borage plant, SOD activity was significantly increased in Si treatment but activity of CAT and APX was slightly decreased in Si application (Table 1). However, Shekari et al. (in press) found that activities of CAT, APX, SOD, and POD were highly increased under Si application with NaCl to herbal Anethum graveolens plants. Same pattern of SOD, GPX, APX, GR, and CAT activities was observed by Al-aghabary et al. (2005); Liang et al. (2003), and Zhu et al. (2004). The activities were significantly increased in Si applied barley, cucumber, and tomato plants (Table 1).
Table 1
| Abiotic stresses | Silicon effect | Crop plant | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salinity | Increased activity of LPO | Barley | Liang et al., 2003 |
| Salinity | Increased activity of SOD, GPX, APX, and GR Decreased activity of ELP and LPO | Cucumber | Zhu et al., 2004 |
| Salinity | Increased activity of SOD and CAT Decreased activity of APX and MDA | Tomato | Al-aghabary et al., 2005 |
| Salinity | Decreased activity of CAT, MDA, POD, and PPO | Rice | Kim et al., 2014c |
| Salinity | Increased activity of SOD Decreased activity of CAT and APX | Borago | Torabi et al., 2015 |
| Salinity | Increased activity of CAT, APX, SOD, and POD | Dill | Shekari et al., in press |
| Drought | Increased activity of CAT, SOD, and GR | Wheat | Gong et al., 2005 |
| Drought | Increased ascorbate contents Reduced glutathione and flavonoid contents | Wheat | Ma et al., 2016 |
| Drought | Decreased activity of APX and MDA | Sunflower | Gunes et al., 2008 |
| Drought | Increased activity of SOD and CAT Decreased activity of POD | Tomato | Shi et al., 2014 |
| Drought | Increased activity of SOD and CAT | Tomato | Shi et al., 2016 |
| High Tem. | Increased activity of SOD, APX, and GPX Decreased activity of CAT | Salvia splendens | Soundararajan et al., 2014 |
| Low Tem. | Increased activity of SOD, GSH, APX, MDHAR, GR, and AsA Decreased activity of MDA | Cucumber | Liu et al., 2009 |
| Low Tem. | Increased activity of GSH and AsA Decreased activity of MDA | Maize | Habibi, 2016 |
| Low Tem. | Increased activity of SOD, CAT, and POD Decreased activity of MDA | Turfgrass | He et al., 2010 |
| Mechanical Wounding | Increased activity of CAT, POD and PPO Decreased activity of MDA | Rice | Kim et al., 2016 |
| Ultraviolet-B | Decreased activity of CAT and POD | Soybean | Shen et al., 2010 |
| Ultraviolet-B | Increased activity of SOD and APX Decreased activity of CAT and GPX | Wheat | Tripathi et al., 2017 |
| Heavy metal (Cd) | Decreased activity of MDA | Rice | Kim et al., 2014a |
| Heavy metal (Mn) | Decreased activity of POD | Cucumber | Maksimović et al., 2012 |
| Heavy metal (Cr) | Increased activity of SOD, GR, and CAT Decreased activity of APX | Pea | Tripathi et al., 2015 |
Modulation of antioxidant activities by Si application under various abiotic stresses.
APX, ascorbate peroxidase; CAT, catalase; GSH, glutathione reduced form; GR, glutathione reductase; GPX, guaiacol peroxidase; LPO, lipid peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; ELP, electrolytic leakage percentage; MDA, malondialdehyde; POD, peroxidase; PPO, polyphenol peroxidase; MDHAR, monodehydroascorbate reductase; AsA, ascorbate.
Drought stress
Drought condition cause damage the photosynthetic pigments and disturb balance between ROS production and antioxidants thus overall affecting crop productivity (Iturbe-Ormaetxe et al., 1998; Gong et al., 2005). According to Gong et al. (2005), Si treatment in wheat plants caused high drought tolerance by up-regulating antioxidant activities of CAT, SOD, and GR (Table 1). Ma et al. (2016) also suggested that Si supplement wheat plant showed lower lipid peroxidation, glutathione and total flavonoid content whereas increased ascorbate content was observed. Similarly, Shi et al. (2014, 2016) reported that Si supplementation in tomato plants under PEG induced drought stress caused tolerance via increased SOD and CAT activities as well as improved water uptake ability of roots (Table 1). Whilst, Gunes et al. (2008) observed that Si decreased MDA and APX activities in sunflower during drought condition (Table 1).
Thermal stress
Like other abiotic stress factors, thermo (cold and heat) stress may also disturb the balance between ROS and antioxidants activity. Soundararajan et al. (2014) treated Salvia splendens with Si under high temperature (35°C), and found that the activities of SOD, APX and GPX were increased and contrarily that of CAT was decreased (Table 1). Liu et al. (2009) observed that during low temperature (day/night; 15/8°C), Si applied to hydroponically cultivated cucumber plant were more resistant to chilling stress compared to non-Si application and was attributed to more activated antioxidants such as SOD, GSH, APX, GR, MDHAR, and AsA (Table 1). Almost same tendency of chilling (day/night; 15/5°C) stress tolerance was observed in turf grass as well, after Na2SiO3 fertilization into soil (He et al., 2010; Habibi, 2016; Table 1).
Mechanical wounding
Normally, natural wounding stress is caused by herbivory or lodging and these events could increase hydrogen peroxide level inside plant tissues (León et al., 2001). According to Kim et al. (2014a), exogenous Si application in rice plants improved mechanical strength to overcome losses from wounding stress (Table 1).
Ultraviolet-B
Many studies demonstrated that Si application can induce resistance to UV-B stress via physiological and biochemical process in plants (Tripathi et al., 2017). In particular, when UV-B applied to tropical plants, MDA, POD, SOD, and anthocyanin contents was increased however, they found decreased activity of CAT was measured (Todorova et al., 2014; Table 1). According to Tripathi et al. (2017), UV stress was significantly improved at Si and Si nanoparticle (SiNp) applied wheat seedlings. Especially, mitigation effects between Si and SiNp showed that SiNp applied wheat seedling revealed more strong resistance to UV-B stress (Table 1). Other study reported that decreased activity of POD and CAT were measured when they applied Si with UV-B stress to soybean plants (Shen et al., 2010; Table 1).
Heavy metal stress
In addition, during heavy metal stress, Si application can regulate metal transport and prevent damage shown by decreased MDA activity in rice plants (Kim et al., 2016). In cucumber, Si application can ameliorate manganese toxicity observed by decreased POD activity (Maksimović et al., 2012; Table 1). Tripathi et al. (2015) applied SiNp with chromium (Cr) to pea seedling after that, they confirmed stress tolerance phenotypes such as enhanced photosynthetic pigments as well as increased activity of SOD, GR, and CAT however, APX activity was decreased (Table 1).
Conclusions
During abiotic stress conditions, the Si application shows varying response to ROS scavenging by activating the defense system plants. In doing so, the activity of antioxidant arsenals (CAT, SOD, PPO, POD, APX, GPX, and GSSH) may also oscillate depending upon the intensity of stress and plant type. Si supplemented plants showed resistance to abiotic stress through, lowering ROS production by (i) enhancing CAT and APX activities as both are involved in conversion of H2O2 into H2O (ii) and decreasing MDA activity.
Funding
This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Research Center Support Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (716001-7)
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Author contributions
YK wrote the manuscript; MW and AK contributed in drafting and revising manuscript; IL draw the figure and revised the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Abdel-HaliemM. E.HegazyH. S.HassanN. S.NaguibD. M. (2017). Effect of silica ions and nano silica on rice plants under salinity stress. Ecol. Eng.99, 282–289. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.060
2
Al-aghabaryK.ZhuZ.ShiQ. (2005). Influence of silicon supply on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidative enzyme activities in tomato plants under salt stress. J. Plant Nut.27, 2101–2115. 10.1081/PLN-200034641
3
ApelK.HirtH. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.55, 373–399. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701
4
ArbonaV.FlorsV.JacasJ.GarcÃa-AgustÃnP.Gómez-CadenasA. (2003). Enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant responses of Carrizo citrange, a salt-sensitive citrus rootstock, to different levels of salinity. Plant Cell Physiol.44, 388–394. 10.1093/pcp/pcg059
5
AsadaK. (1999). The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.50, 601–639. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.601
6
BaxterA.MittlerR.SuzukiN. (2014). ROS as key players in plant stress signalling. J. Exp. Bot.65, 1229–1240. 10.1093/jxb/ert375
7
CaverzanA.PassaiaG.Barcellos RosaS. B.Werner RiveiroC. W.LazzarottoF.Margis-PinheiroM. (2012). Plant responses to stresses: role of ascorbate peroxidse in the zntioxidant protection. Genet. Mol. Biol.35, 1011–1019. 10.1590/S1415-47572012000600016
8
CookeJ.LeishmanM. R. (2011). Is plant ecology more siliceous than we realise?Trends Plant Sci.16, 61–68. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.10.003
9
DasK.RoychoudhuryA. (2014). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front Environ Sci.2:53. 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00053
10
EpsteinE. (1999). Silicon. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.50, 641–664. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.641
11
FaltinZ.HollandD.VelchevaM.TsapovetskyM.Roeckel-DrevetP.HandaA. K.et al. (2010). Glutathione peroxidase regulation of reactive oxygen species level is crucial for in vitro plant differentiation. Plant Cell Physiol.51, 1151–1162. 10.1093/pcp/pcq082
12
FryerM. J. (1992). The antioxidant effects of thylakoid vitamin E (α-tocopherol). Plant Cell Environ.15, 381–392. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00988.x
13
GillS. S.TutejaN. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in aboitic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem.48, 909–930. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
14
GongH.ZhuX.ChenK.WangS.ZhangC. (2005). Silicon alleviates oxidative damage of wheat plants in pots under drought. Plant Sci.169, 313–321. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.023
15
GowayedS. M.Al-ZahraniH. S.MetwaliE. M. (2017). Improving the Salinity tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum) by exogenous application of silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Agric. Biol.19, 183–194. 10.17957/IJAB/15.0262
16
GunesA.PilbeamD. J.InalA.CobanS. (2008). Influence of silicon on sunflower cultivars under drought stress, I: growth, antioxidant mechanisms, and lipid peroxidation. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.39, 1885–1903. 10.1080/00103620802134651
17
HabibiG. (2016). Effect of foliar-applied silicon on photochemistry, antioxidant capacity and growth in maize plants subjected to chilling stress. Acta Agric. Slov107, 33–43. 10.14720/aas.2016.107.1.04
18
HamayunM.SohnE. Y.KhanS. A.ShinwariZ. K.KhanA. L.LeeI. J. (2010). Silicon alleviates the adverse effects of salinity and drought stress on growth and endogenous plant growth hormones of soybean (Glycine max L.). Pak. J. Bot.42, 1713–1722.
19
HeY.XiaoH.WangH.ChenY.YuM. (2010). Effect of silicon on chilling-induced changes of solutes, antioxidants, and membrane stability in seashore paspalum turfgrass. Acta Physiol. Plant32, 487–494. 10.1007/s11738-009-0425-x
20
HicksL. M.CahoonR. E.BonnerE. R.RivardR. S.SheffieldJ.JezJ. M. (2007). Thiol-based regulation of redox-active glutamate-cysteine ligase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell19, 2653–2661. 10.1105/tpc.107.052597
21
Iturbe-OrmaetxeI.EscuredoP. R.Arrese-IgorC.BecanaM. (1998). Oxidative damage in pea plants exposed to water deficit or paraquat. Plant physiology116, 173–181. 10.1104/pp.116.1.173
22
KatariaS. (2017). Chapter 6: Oxidative stress and antioxidative defence system in plants in response to UVB stress, in UV-B Radiation: From Environmental Stressor to Regulator of Plant Growth, eds SinghV. P.SinghS.PrasadS. M.PariharP.(New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons), 99–122.
23
KühlbrandtW.WangD. N.FujiyoshiY. (1994). Atomic model of plant light-harvesting complex by electron crystallography. Nature367, 614–621. 10.1038/367614a0
24
KimY. H.KhanA. L.KimD. H.LeeS. Y.KimK. M.WaqasM.et al. (2014a). Silicon mitigates heavy metal stress by regulating P-type heavy metal ATPases, Oryza sativa low silicon genes, and endogenous phytohormones. BMC Plant Biol.14:13. 10.1186/1471-2229-14-13
25
KimY. H.KhanA. L.ShinwariZ. K.KimD. H.WaqasM.KamranM.et al. (2012). Silicon treatment to rice (Oryza sativa L. cv.'Gopumbyeo') plants during different growth periods and its effects on growth and grain yield. Pak. J. Bot.44, 891–897.
26
KimY. H.KhanA. L.WaqasM.JeongH. J.KimD. H.ShinJ. S.et al. (2014b). Regulation of jasmonic acid biosynthesis by silicon application during physical injury to Oryza sativa L. J. Plant Res.127, 525–532. 10.1007/s10265-014-0641-3
27
KimY. H.KhanA. L.WaqasM.ShahzadR.LeeI. J. (2016). Silicon-mediated mitigation of wounding stress acts by up-regulating the rice antioxidant system. Cereal Res. Commun.44, 111–121. 10.1556/0806.43.2015.031
28
KimY. H.KhanA. L.WaqasM.ShimJ. K.KimD. H.LeeK. Y.et al. (2014c). Silicon application to rice root zone influenced the phytohormonal and antioxidant responses under salinity stress. J. Plant Growth Regul.33, 137–149. 10.1007/s00344-013-9356-2
29
LeónJ.RojoE.Sánchez SerranoJ. J. (2001). Wound signalling in plants. J. Exp. Bot.52, 1–9. 10.1093/jxb/52.354.1
30
LiangY.ChenQ.LiuQ.ZhangW.DingR. (2003). Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Plant Physiol.160, 1157–1164. 10.1078/0176-1617-01065
31
LiuJ. J.LinS. H.XuP. L.WangX. J.BaiJ. G. (2009). Effects of exogenous silicon on the activities of antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in chilling-stressed cucumber leaves. Agr. Sci. China8, 1075–1086. 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60315-6
32
LoboV.PatilA.PhatakA.ChandraN. (2010). Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: impact on human health. Pharmacogn Rev.4, 118–126. 10.4103/0973-7847.70902
33
LuS.LiL. (2008). Carotenoid metabolism: biosynthesis, regulation, and beyond. J. Integr. Plant Biol.50, 778–785. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00708.x
34
MaD.SunD.WangC.QinH.DingH.LiY.et al. (2016). Silicon application alleviates drought stress in wheat through transcriptional regulation of multiple antioxidant defense pathways. J. Plant Growth Regul.35, 1–10. 10.1007/s00344-015-9500-2
35
MaJ. F.TakahashiE. (2002). Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant Silicon Research in Japan. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
36
MaJ. F.TamaiK.YamajiN.MitaniN.KonishiS.KatsuharaM.et al. (2006). A silicon transporter in rice. Nature440, 688–691. 10.1038/nature04590
37
MaJ. F.YamajiN. (2008). Functions and transport of silicon in plants. Cell Mol. Life Sci.65, 3049–3057. 10.1007/s00018-008-7580-x
38
MaksimovićJ. D.MojovićM.MaksimovićV.RömheldV.NikolicM. (2012). Silicon ameliorates manganese toxicity in cucumber by decreasing hydroxyl radical accumulation in the leaf apoplast. J. Exp. Bot.63, 2411–2420. 10.1093/jxb/err359
39
Mateos-NaranjoE.GalleA.Florez-SarasaI.PerdomoJ. A.GalmésJ.Ribas-CarbóM.et al. (2015). Assessment of the role of silicon in the Cu-tolerance of the C 4 grass Spartina densiflora. J. Plant Physiol.178, 74–83. 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.03.001
40
MitaniN.ChibaY.YamajiN.MaJ. F. (2009). Identification and characterization of maize and barley Lsi2-like silicon efflux transporters reveals a distinct silicon uptake system from that in rice. Plant Cell21, 2133–2142. 10.1105/tpc.109.067884
41
MittlerR. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci.7, 405–410. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02312-9
42
NoctorG.GomezL.VanackerH.FoyerC. H. (2002). Interactions between biosynthesis, compartmentation and transport in the control of glutathione homeostasis and signaling. J. Exp. Bot.53, 1283–1304. 10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1283
43
RacchiM. L. (2013). Antioxidant defenses in plants with attention to Prunus and Citrus spp. Antioxidants2, 340–369. 10.3390/antiox2040340
44
RouhierN.JacquotJ. P. (2008). Getting sick may help plants overcome abiotic stress. New Phytol.180, 738–741. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02673.x
45
SharmaP.JhaA. B.DubeyR. S.PessarakliM. (2012). Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J. Bot.2012:217037. 10.1155/2012/217037
46
ShekariF.AbbasiA.MustafaviS. H. (in press). Effect of silicon and selenium on enzymatic changes and productivity of dill in saline condition. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 10.1016/j.jssas.2015.11.006
47
ShenX.ZhouY.DuanL.LiZ.EnejiA. E.LiJ. (2010). Silicon effects on photosynthesis and antioxidant parameters of soybean seedlings under drought and ultraviolet-B radiation. J. Plant Physiol.167, 1248–1252. 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.04.011
48
ShiY.ZhangY.HanW.FengR.HuY.GuoJ.et al. (2016). Silicon enhances water stress tolerance by improving root hydraulic conductance in Solanum lycopersicum L. Front. Plant Sci.7:196. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00196
49
ShiY.ZhangY.YaoH.WuJ.SunH.GongH. (2014). Silicon improves seed germination and alleviates oxidative stress of bud seedlings in tomato under water deficit stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem.78, 27–36. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.02.009
50
SoundararajanP.SivanesanI.JanaS.JeongB. R. (2014). Influence of silicon supplementation on the growth and tolerance to high temperature in Salvia splendens. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol.55, 271–279. 10.1007/s13580-014-0023-8
51
SunW. H.DuanM.ShuD. F.YangS.MengQ. W. (2010). Over-expression of tomato tAPX gene in tobacco improves tolerance to high or low temperature stress. Biol. Plant54, 614–620. 10.1007/s10535-010-0111-2
52
SuzukiN.RiveroR. M.ShulaevV.BlumwaldE.MittlerR. (2014). Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol.203, 32–43. 10.1111/nph.12797
53
SytarO.KumarA.LatowskiD.KuczynskaP.StrzałkaK.PrasadM. N. V. (2013). Heavy metal-induced oxidative damage, defense reactions, and detoxification mechanisms in plants. Acta Physiol. Plant35, 985–999. 10.1007/s11738-012-1169-6
54
SzarkaA.BánhegyiG.AsardH. (2013). The inter-relationship of ascorbate transport, metabolism and mitochondrial, plastidic respiration. Antioxid Redox Signal.19, 1036–1044. 10.1089/ars.2012.5059
55
TodorovaD.SergievI.MoskovaI.KaterovaZ.GeorgievaN.AlexievaV.et al. (2014). Biochemical responses of triticale plants treated with UV-B irradiation and nutrient solution enriched with humic acids. Turkish J. Bot.38, 747–753. 10.3906/bot-1312-52
56
TorabiF.MajdA.EnteshariS. (2015). The effect of silicon on alleviation of salt stress in borage (Borago officinalis L.). Soil Sci. Plant Nut.61, 788–798. 10.1080/00380768.2015.1005540
57
TripathiD. K.SinghS.SinghV. P.PrasadS. M.DubeyN. K.ChauhanD. K. (2017). Silicon nanoparticles more effectively alleviated UV-B stress than silicon in wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem.110, 70–81. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.06.026
58
TripathiD. K.SinghV. P.PrasadS. M.ChauhanD. K.DubeyN. K. (2015). Silicon nanoparticles (SiNp) alleviate chromium (VI) phytotoxicity in Pisum sativum (L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem.96, 189–198. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.07.026
59
VatanseverR.OzyigitI. I.FilizE.GozukaraN. (2017). Genome-wide exploration of silicon (Si) transporter genes, Lsi1 and Lsi2 in plants; insights into Si-accumulation status/capacity of plants. BioMetals30, 185–200. 10.1007/s10534-017-9992-2
60
WuZ.LiuS.ZhaoJ.WangF.DuY.ZouS.et al. (2017). Comparative responses to silicon and selenium in relation to antioxidant enzyme system and the glutathione-ascorbate cycle in flowering Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis var. utilis) under cadmium stress. Environ. Exp. Bot.133, 1–11. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.09.005
61
XiangC.OliverD. J. (1998). Glutathione metabolic genes coordinately respond to heavy metals and jasmonic acid in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell10, 1539–1550. 10.1105/tpc.10.9.1539
62
YamajiN.ChibaY.Mitani-UenoN.MaJ. F. (2012). Functional characterization of a silicon transporter gene implicated in silicon distribution in barley. Plant Physiol.160, 1491–1497. 10.1104/pp.112.204578
63
ZhuZ.WeiG.LiJ.QianQ.YuJ. (2004). Silicon alleviates salt stress and increases antioxidant enzymes activity in leaves of salt-stressed cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Sci167, 527–533. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.04.020
Summary
Keywords
oxidative stress, stress response, Si fertilization, biochemical and physiological function, stress in plants
Citation
Kim Y-H, Khan AL, Waqas M and Lee I-J (2017) Silicon Regulates Antioxidant Activities of Crop Plants under Abiotic-Induced Oxidative Stress: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 8:510. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00510
Received
25 January 2017
Accepted
23 March 2017
Published
06 April 2017
Volume
8 - 2017
Edited by
Rupesh Kailasrao Deshmukh, Laval University, Canada
Reviewed by
Sajad Majeed Zargar, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India; Javaid Akhter Bhat, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), India
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Kim, Khan, Waqas and Lee.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: In-Jung Lee ijlee@knu.ac.kr
This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.