Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants: Myriad Roles of Ascorbate Peroxidase
- 1Plant Molecular Biology Lab, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India
- 2Department of Biotechnology, Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun, India
- 3Plant Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Botany, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
- 4Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
- 5Department of Basic Sciences, College of Forestry, VCSG Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry (UUHF), Ranichauri, India
- 6Department of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India
One of the most significant manifestations of environmental stress in plants is the increased production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). These ROS, if allowed to accumulate unchecked, can lead to cellular toxicity. A battery of antioxidant molecules is present in plants for keeping ROS levels under check and to maintain the cellular homeostasis under stress. Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) is a key antioxidant enzyme of such scavenging systems. It catalyses the conversion of H2O2 into H2O, employing ascorbate as an electron donor. The expression of APX is differentially regulated in response to environmental stresses and during normal plant growth and development as well. Different isoforms of APX show differential response to environmental stresses, depending upon their sub-cellular localization, and the presence of specific regulatory elements in the upstream regions of the respective genes. The present review delineates role of APX isoforms with respect to different types of abiotic stresses and its importance as a key antioxidant enzyme in maintaining cellular homeostasis.
Abiotic and biotic stresses are a regular feature in natural plant environment. Stress is quite unpredictable in its duration, occurrence, and intensity and thus maintaining the growth and survival is a herculean task in affected regions. Plants can perceive even a lowest environmental stress signal and reproductive stages are most sensitive to it. Reactive oxygen species or free radicals are produced as a by-product in various cellular compartments especially mitochondria and chloroplasts in association with different kinds of oxidases (Van Breusegem and Dat, 2006). These ROS are important for signaling in several growth and developmental processes and in comprehending biotic and abiotic stresses along with programmed cell death (Bailey-Serres and Mittler, 2006). But when ROS are present in excess amounts they bring about a severe damage to cellular structure and macromolecules. Scavenging systems comprising of many antioxidants and enzymes counter these ROS entities and convert them into less toxic products in the cell, sometimes even at the site of their generation. Under stress conditions, the redox homeostasis of the cell is rapidly disturbed accumulating abundant ROS (Halliwell, 2006). Antioxidant enzymes and their isoforms come into play to remove these free radicals and APX is one of the central enzymes in this system. Its role in maintaining redox balance has been seen both in normal plant life cycle and during various abiotic stress conditions, validated through various transgenic approaches. In this review, we describe the importance of APX as a key antioxidant enzyme and the myriad roles that its isoforms perform in mitigating various environmental stresses.
Plant Stress and Reactive Oxygen Species
Plant growth and development is squarely dependent on the availability of optimal environmental conditions and nutritional factors and any deviation from these conditions constitutes stress. It induces non-specific reversible changes and responses at various functional levels which may become permanent if allowed to persist for a longer duration. Plants, being sessile, have to confront these adverse conditions, and essentially require special adaptive mechanisms to combat them. The duration and magnitude of stress determines the severity of symptoms while the physiological manifestations involve an increase in respiration, alterations in electron transport system, inhibition of photosynthesis, and reduction in biomass. The cellular responses to stress include altered cell cycle, changes in the induction of vacuolization, and cell wall organization allowing to tolerate the stress (Cramer et al., 2007; dos Reis et al., 2012). There are alterations in the anatomy, physiology, and energy consumption which increases due to a shift in cellular metabolism to maintain cellular homeostasis. Plants react to stress by either acclimatization i.e., adjusting to the new conditions and reaching a state of homeostasis or adaptations which involve permanent alterations introduced to resist stress (Chinnusamy and Zhu, 2009).
Stress is generally categorized into two primary groups: biotic and abiotic. Biotic stress is perceived when other living organisms such as weeds, microbial pathogens, and insects induce damage to the plant while abiotic stress is caused by a physical or chemical entity in the immediate environment resulting in altered growth and productivity. The growth recovery is facilitated in case of the stress being short term, of low intensity, or the plant being tolerant. But when it cannot withstand this attack, its metabolic functions are severely affected, the phenological stages are hindered and it ultimately dies. The primary abiotic stresses include water-deficit, salinity, cold, heat, and oxidative stress.
ROS are inevitable components of aerobic metabolism. Sequential reduction of molecular oxygen produces 1O2 (singlet oxygen), H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide), O2.− (superoxide radical), and OH. (hydroxyl radical) by electron transport systems in different sub-cellular compartments like cytosol, chloroplasts, mitochondria, and microbodies (Dias et al., 2014). They have critical signaling roles at lower concentrations in processes like seed germination, pollen tube growth, leaf development and senescence, root hair growth, cell elongation, embryo formation, gravitropism, self-incompatibility, and many more (Gechev et al., 2006). This is achieved with the help of redox sensitive proteins (redox protein), mobilization of calcium, phosphorylation of protein, and gene expression.
These ROS are also the resultants of alterations in cellular metabolism which are induced in response to various environmental stresses culminating in oxidative stress (Shigeoka et al., 2002). ROS activate and/or regulate the primary and secondary signaling pathways during abiotic, oxidative, wounding, or pathogen stresses by their synthesis or detoxification (Duque et al., 2013). Temporary production of ROS, also termed as “respiratory burst,” is a common feature in biotic stress occurring during early wounding or plant-pathogen interactions. Various key players in ROS signaling pathways include zinc finger proteins (Zat 12, Zat 7) and WRKY TFs. ROS are secondary messengers in ABA transduction pathway in guard cells during abiotic stress. ABA induces H2O2 to reduce water loss (Baxter et al., 2014). Salicylic acid (SA) is also reported to be a regulator of ROS during wounding (Sharma et al., 2012).
Antioxidative Defence System in Plants
The level of ROS in the cell is determined from balance between their production and scavenging by antioxidants. When ROS levels exceed a threshold required for plant metabolic processes, they become able to damage the major macromolecules of the cell i.e., proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids (Das and Roychoudhury, 2014; Kapoor, 2015). Since abiotic stresses produce abundant ROS which cause detrimental effects, its detoxification is of paramount importance to protect cellular integrity. To maintain a redox homeostasis, antioxidant defense systems are continuously activated in the plant. They comprise of two components: enzymatic and non-enzymatic. The enzymatic components (Figure 1) include superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), guaiacol peroxidase (GP), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), and glutathione reductase (GR). The non-enzymatic components are compounds like ascorbic acid (ASC), carotenoids, flavanoids, phenolics, reduced glutathione (GSH), and α-tocopherol which act as antioxidant buffers removing higher levels of ROS and are found in all sub-cellular compartments (Miller et al., 2010).
The stress conditions always result in an excessive production of ROS which causes a major shift in redox environment. This interferes with signaling pathways, thus, leading to the scavenging and detoxification of free radicals and other intermediate compounds through antioxidant systems (Yun et al., 2010). Excess of activates SOD which converts to H2O2 and the latter is removed by APX. Thus, these antioxidant systems eliminate excess ROS not required for basic plant processes and stabilize the internal biochemical state of the cell during various abiotic stresses, leading to acclimatization as well as tolerance (Bowler and Fluhr, 2000; Scandalios, 2005).
Ascorbate peroxidase is reported to be an efficient regulator of ROS, as it contributes maximally to hydrogen peroxide detoxification. Being present in various sub-cellular organelles, APX is also one of the most regulated enzymes (Saxena et al., 2011).
Ascorbate Peroxidase (EC 188.8.131.52)
APX belongs to the family of heme containing peroxidases that catalyse the H2O2-dependent oxidation of a wide range of organic molecules. It is present across a wide spectrum of plant kingdom and plays a crucial role in growth regulation. APX differs from other peroxidases in its dependency on ASC as the source of reducing power and becomes unstable in its absence (Shigeoka et al., 2002). There are multigenic families of APX in higher plants for e.g., Arabidopsis has 9 APX genes (AtAPX1-AtAPX6, sAPX, tAPX, lAPX) and Oryza sativa has 8 isozymes (OsAPX1-OsAPX8), having two APX each in cytosol, peroxisome, chloroplast and mitochondria (Table 1). Similarly, tomato has seven genes encoding different APX isozymes (Chew et al., 2003; Teixeira et al., 2004). Different isozymes of APX, which are classified on the basis of their sub-cellular localization, show different structural, and kinetic properties, including the presence of specific conserved domains and signal peptides. The thylakoidal isoform is reported to be the first one to intercept an H2O2 molecule as it is located adjacent to the acceptor of photosystem I (Huseynova et al., 2014). Broadly, on the basis of amino acid composition, five isoforms of APX have been classified in plants, viz cytosolic (cAPX: APX 1&2), mitochondrial (mitAPX), chloroplastic (chlAPX: stromal-APX and thylakoidal-APX), and peroxisomal/glyoxysomal (mAPX). It is interesting to note that all the isoforms of APX originate from alternative splicing, which contributes to the differential regulation of expression of various isoforms (Caverzan et al., 2012). All isoforms differ in their kinetic properties like molecular weight, optimal pH, stability, catalytic rate, and substrate affinity. As APXs are heme-dependent oxido-reductases, iron is critical for the catalytic activity and iron deficiency reduces its activity. Similar effect is observed when ascorbate concentrations are reduced, wherein the activity and stability of the enzymes is adversely affected. The cytosolic APX isoforms are more sensitive for reduction in ascorbate than chloroplastic, both stromal and thylakoid membrane-bound APX.
APXs have two important histidine residues, His42 and His163 and a K+ binding site which are required for APX activity. Ascorbate binds to the active site of the protein by four hydrogen bonds with lysine and arginine residues and the heme moiety, with the site of substrate binding (Cys32, Arg172, Lys30) being highly conserved (Chen and Asada, 1989). APX activity has been found to increase in presence of other antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase, indicating a cross talk amongst various antioxidant enzymes. APX is unable to scavenge lipid hydroperoxides and is inhibited by cyanide, azide, and thiol-modifiers. The whole family of APX shows inducive responses to ABA treatment, with the cytosolic one being the most induced one (Zhang et al., 2014). The existence of multiple molecular forms of APX within the cells and organelles signifies the important role played by them in developmental processes and stress tolerance (Ishikawa et al., 1998; Shigeoka et al., 2002).
Cytosolic APX has been reported to be the most responsive isoform that is encoded by a single gene apx1 and is also the best characterized apx gene. It has a heat shock responsive element in the 5′ regulatory region and an anti-peroxidative element (ARE) specifically for H2O2 scavenging. APX and its various isoforms are actively expressed under biotic stresses (pathogen attack, herbivory, physical damage) as well as under abiotic stresses (salt, drought, heat, cold, UV radiations, oxidative stress etc.) (Table 2). The extent of expression of APX directly correlates with the duration and intensity of the imposed stress, as well as the multiplicity of stresses. Further, the same kind of stress can induce differential expression of isozymes in different sub-cellular sites (Shigeoka et al., 2002).
Ascorbate-Glutathione (ASC-GSH) Pathway
The enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant molecules work in a close coordination to give a meaningful protection from oxidative stress. Two pathways are interconnected via APX enzyme which functions as a linking molecule for maintaining the redox balance under stress. Ascorbate and glutathione have long been known to have a close association. Since both of them were assumed to have a role in detoxification, they have been studied in chloroplast samples and found to be associated with NADPH (Foyer and Halliwell, 1976, 1977). Thus, the APX-ascorbate link also serves to regulate the NADPH/NAD ratio under stress. This central scheme in which ascorbate peroxidase-ascorbate and glutathione work in tandem is known as the Ascorbate-Glutathione (ASC-GSH) pathway or Foyer-Halliwell-Asada pathway (Figure 2) that functions in both plants and animals. The importance of this pathway can be gauged from the fact that it is present in cytosol, chloroplast (stromal and thylakoid bound), mitochondria, and peroxisomes (Mittler and Zilinskas, 1991; Jimenez and Hernandez, 1997). It is known as the heart of the redox homeostasis and performs the function of a unified scavenger of ROS, although other antioxidant enzymes and components are also present in plant cells. It has been reported that detoxification of ROS through ASC-GSH pathway causes transient adjustments in the levels of most of the intermediates of this pathway (Noctor et al., 2000; Mittler et al., 2004; Noctor, 2006; Foyer and Shigeoka, 2011).
The stress generated H2O2 inactivates photosynthetic mechanism and disturbs the electron transport system and cellular respiration (Kaiser, 1976; Charles and Halliwell, 1980). Accumulation of H2O2 is highly toxic for the cell as H2O2 is the only radical species that can pass through the biological membranes and invade other sub-cellular compartments. Further, H2O2 can also lead to the production of highly reactive hydroxyl radicals in the presence of divalent cations (Figure 2). Therefore, rapid scavenging of H2O2, via ascorbate peroxidase, is extremely important for a potent antioxidant system (Asada, 1999). The possibility that ASC and GSH might function independently has been studied. Andrea Polle developed a metabolic model in 2001 as a tool to analyse the network of redox reactions in Superoxide dismutase (SOD)-ascorbate (ASC)-glutathione (GSH) cycle. The computational simulation analysis was based on previously determined concentrations of all components of the cycle, kinetic properties of antioxidative enzymes and some more others crucial parameters. The simulation results concluded a higher production rate of H2O2 in the absence of APXs without significant effects on the redox balance of ASC/DHA/ or GSH/GSSG and the coupling between ASC and GSH-related redox systems was weak (Polle, 2001).
APX Expression Under Various Environmental Conditions
APX gene expression has been reported to increase on exposure to drought, salt, cold, heat, pathogen infection, wound stress, and other biotic or abiotic stresses. However, the quantitative expression varies in different sub-cellular compartments and is also dependent on the developmental stages of the plant and the imposed stress conditions. Increase in APX activity is many times supplemented with the activity of other antioxidant enzymes that work in tandem with APX (Teixeira et al., 2006; Lee Y. P. et al., 2007).
Direct Oxidative Stress
There are many biotic and abiotic factors present in the environment that are responsible for the generation of oxidative stress/ROS in plants. These factors may directly contribute to ROS production via dissipation of excess energy, reducing power, or may indirectly cause ROS production by altering the cellular metabolism. In case of methyl viologen treatment stress, chlAPX (sAPX and tAPX) is the primary target for inactivation apart from cAPX and mAPXs which show lesser sensitivity toward the chemical (Mano et al., 2001). Different plant species have differential abilities to up-regulate APX activity under stress, e.g., the tAPX usually cannot scavenge excess amounts of ROS; but when over-expressed it reduces damage under pathogen attack by reducing NO (Nitric Oxide) symptoms. Over-expression of cAPX in tobacco chloroplasts leads to increased tolerance to oxidative stress induced by paraquat as well as salinity (Dąbrowska et al., 2007). APX activity is reported to increase in Arabidopsis during exposure to UV-B radiations (Rao et al., 1996). cAPX transcripts were increased in germinating rice embryos upon treatment with hydroxyl-urea or amino-triazole that resulted in increased cellular H2O2 levels. Similarly, APX was up-regulated in Arabidopsis bundle sheath cells, upon exposure to high light intensity, due to increase in H2O2 accumulation (Karpinski et al., 1999; Morita et al., 1999). Interestingly, double mutants for APX1 and CAT1 were found to be less sensitive to oxidative stress than individual single mutants, as the former probably activated a compensatory scavenging antioxidant and defense mechanism (Rizhsky et al., 2002).
Expression of APXs Under Saline Conditions
Salinity stress creates ion imbalances and induces physiological drought like conditions by limiting the amount of water available to the plant. Under such conditions, APX provides salinity tolerance at different levels to the affected plants. Loss of function cAPX mutants show susceptibility to salinity induced oxidative stress, while constitutive over-expression lines show improved tolerance to 100 mM NaCl stress (Diaz-Vivancos et al., 2013). Tomato plants over expressing pea cAPX were reported to be tolerant to salinity stress (Wang et al., 2005). Over-expression of OsAPX2 shows better tolerance to salt stress as compared to OsAPX1 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. However, the observed differential tolerance affect could be due to the positional effect of different transgenic lines. A cAPX from Arabidopsis in transgenic tobacco increased salt, drought, and PEG tolerance. Salt stress leads to lipid peroxidation and damaged membranes in sensitive plants which is accompanied by low levels of antioxidant enzymes. BY-2 cell lines of transgenic tobacco, having 50 and 75% lower cAPX activity, showed increased ROS accumulation. Ascorbate peroxidase gene expression during stress led to salt and heat tolerance with no significant changes in levels of other ROS scavenging enzymes (Gueta-Dahan et al., 1997; Badawi et al., 2004; Ishikawa et al., 2005; Lu et al., 2007). During saline conditions, pea chloroplast APXs behaved differently, with sAPX increasing and tAPX decreasing gradually while a tAPX from Solanum lycopersicum expressed in tobacco provided increased tolerance to salt and osmotic stress. An increased activity of chlAPX under salt stress also provides protection against ROS produced in mitochondria and/or peroxisomes. Salt stress tolerance was induced in transgenic tobacco accumulating increased ascorbate. In French bean seedlings, drought, and salt conditions up-regulated expression of gene encoding APX (Shalata et al., 2001; Mittova et al., 2003; Gómez et al., 2004; Eltelib et al., 2012; Nageshbabu and Jyothi, 2013). Over-expression of an APX from Puccinellia tenuiflora, a salinity tolerant wild grass in Arabidopsis increased its tolerance to 175mM NaCl in addition to protection from lipid peroxidation. Transcripts for a mAPX from Hordeum vulgare was increased under salinity conditions and another peroxisomal APX from Populus, transformed in tobacco, imparted salt, drought, and MV stress tolerance along with longer roots (Shi et al., 2001; Li et al., 2009). Additionally, APX deficient mutants are able to up-regulate other peroxidases to compensate for APX loss and to provide stress tolerance. This is validated by the expression of rice GPX in rice APX 1/2 mutants and other enzymes (CAT and GP) were upregulated in APX 3 knockout mutants of Arabidopsis showing no signs of stress. The APX expression is also affected by SA when externally applied by increasing APX and GR activity, which increases salt tolerance in mung bean (Narendra et al., 2006; Bonifacio et al., 2011; Nazar et al., 2011; Guan et al., 2015). Response of all antioxidant enzymes during salt stress in Brazilian indica rice was analyzed in two developmental stages and it was found that cAPX was up-regulated in 11 day old seedlings, while no significant APX expression was observed in 6-week old plants (Menezes-Benavente et al., 2004). This stress induces genesis of ROS, therefore, response of APX isozymes to this situation in plant developmental stages is regulated. The normal salinity tolerant rice leaf basal region showed an increase in CAT and APX transcripts under salinity stress and levels of APX8 were slightly reduced. OsAPX2 showed no alteration in expression under salinity (Yamane et al., 2010). The same reduction in response of APX8 was seen in another report where the other isoforms, APX2, and APX7 were highly expressed during salt stress. In another contrasting experiment, OsAPX8 showed high expression in a range of salt concentrations, viz., 150–300 mM in rice roots while there was a drastic decrease in transcripts of OsAPX7 at 300 mM. This variability in expression of different APX genes is due to differences in age, cultivar, plant parts, and physiological conditions of plant growth (Teixeira et al., 2004, 2006; Hong et al., 2007). Sweet potato plants differing in their sensitivity to salt stress showed differential accumulation of APX transcripts with the higher levels in tolerant genotypes. The expression of different isoforms was tissue and stress duration dependent (Lin and Pu, 2010). Salinity stress increased APX transcripts in soybean (Weisany et al., 2012). Therefore, it can be deduced that salt stress causes severe alterations in expression of antioxidant enzymes, it is spatially and temporally variable and different isoforms lead to a stable redox state in the cell.
Expression of APXs Under High Light or Photo-Oxidative Damage
High light leads to reduced efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus and rapid ROS generation. During high light conditions, APX2 is specifically reported to have high expression while other APXs like cAPX (APX1) and tAPX transcripts increase substantially to overcome damage (Karpinski et al., 1999; Yabuta et al., 2002; Fryer et al., 2003; Pignocchi et al., 2003). cAPX and chlAPX showed differential expression in spinach leaves during high light, while the former increased, the latter decreased. A wheat mutant with deficient tAPX had lower photosynthetic efficiency in high light implying importance of this isoform (Yoshimura et al., 2000; Danna et al., 2003). Compared to wild type plants, Arabidopsis mutants with deficiency in either tAPX or sAPX had damaged proteins in light or MV stress with a more pronounced effect with tAPX (Maruta et al., 2010). A simultaneous mutation in two APXs of Arabidopsis, viz., tAPX and cAPX led to mixed results like reduced protein damage, late flowering and high anthocyanin concentrations (Miller et al., 2007b). Mutants lacking either tAPX, sAPX or both in Arabidopsis showed symptoms of partial chlorophyll loss in tAPX mutants, and total bleaching in seedlings for the latter two plants. Mature leaves of the same mutants were susceptible for MV and light stress (Kangasjärvi et al., 2008). Arabidopsis plants deficient in APX1 showed suppression in high light of transcripts of several crucial genes involved in basic plant growth and development processes. In contrast to normal conditions, high light produced induction of enzymes (Pnueli et al., 2003).
APX1 also complements chloroplastic and mitochondrial APXs in tolerating excess light and its absence leads to protein oxidation and photosynthetic failure stating its role in protection of chloroplasts (Davletova et al., 2005). But the transcript levels of chloroplastic or mitochondrial APXs do not increase unlike cAPX to tolerate stress implying their capacity to neutralize ROS even during stress. A 10-fold increase in APX expression also does not contribute to tolerance against ozone stress in tobacco chloroplasts (Torsethaugen et al., 1997). High light intensity and Mg deficiency markedly increased the expression of APX and other antioxidant enzymes in Phaseolus vulgaris L, while the levels in Mg-sufficient plant parts remained constant. The increase in expression was directly proportional to the light intensity (Cakmak and Marschner, 1992).
Expression of APXs Under Temperature Fluctuations
Extremely low or high temperature conditions negatively affect the plant physiology. Chilling stress leads to induced expression of APX in tolerant maize lines, as compared to sensitive lines (Pinhero et al., 1997). Low temperature induces higher cAPX expression in potato tubers as compared to heat stress implying its role in cold acclimation (Kawakami et al., 2002). A mAPX was induced under cold in Arabidopsis (Zhang et al., 1997). A tAPX over-expressed in tobacco improved tolerance to chilling and light stress while Arabidopsis lacking tAPX were tolerant to heat stress (Yabuta et al., 2002; Miller et al., 2007a). Homologous over-expression of a cAPX in rice was highly tolerant toward cold at booting stage due to increased activity of APX in spikelets than wild type plants (Sato et al., 2011). An inducible promoter SWPA2 working under oxidative stresses was used to induce SOD and APX gene expression in potato chloroplasts. The plants obtained were tolerant to high heat and MV stresses with a significant difference from control (Tang et al., 2006). A similar experiment in sweet potato resulted in tolerance against cold and MV stresses (Lim et al., 2007). The tomato tAPX expressed in tobacco led to tolerance against both temperature stresses and photosynthetic efficiency was maintained better in transgenic than non-transformed plants (Sun et al., 2010). In sweet potato, high heat induces cAPX in leaves while in cucumber, cAPX, mAPX, and sAPX were all up-regulated after an initial reduction (Park et al., 2004; Song et al., 2005). A cAPX has been reported to decrease immediately after heat shock treatment, negating its beneficial role in this stress (Vacca et al., 2004) but another report by Karpinski and colleague claims APX2 to be induced under heat conditions (Karpinski et al., 1999). APX1 is reported to be primarily active in case of heat and drought stresses in Arabidopsis cells (Koussevitzky et al., 2008). A mAPX from barley was over-expressed in Arabidopsis to reveal heat stress tolerance (Shi et al., 2001). Thus, different isoforms of APX and antioxidative systems in multiple sub-cellular locations can be exploited to raise environmental stress tolerant plants.
Expression of APXs Under Drought Conditions
APX has an important role in drought stress tolerance and recovery of plants. APX transcripts are fairly increased under drought in transgenic soybean and tobacco which over-expressed P5CS gene. In case of woody plants, APX and other ASC-GSH pathway enzymes were up-regulated after drought in Prunus spp. and declined during recovery phase. Glycine betaine is also reported to increase APX during drought (Sofo et al., 2005; Kausar et al., 2012; Zarei et al., 2012; Cruz et al., 2013). The cAPX (APX1) over-expression also alleviates drought symptoms and transgenic tobacco fared better than non-transgenic plants. Loss of function APX2 mutants also revealed the importance of this isoform in plant growth and development and such mutants were over sensitive to drought as compared to over-expression lines. A mAPX from Salicornia brachiata in over-expression lines provided increased drought tolerance compared to control plants (Zhang et al., 2013; Singh et al., 2014). Faize and colleagues revealed the importance of cAPX in drought stress tolerance in tobacco where a major beneficial effect was on membrane protection (Faize et al., 2011). The APX activity is reported to be higher in tolerant cowpea plants even in non-stress conditions. In stress, the sensitive cultivar up-regulates cAPX and mAPX, while chlAPX was up-regulated in tolerant cultivar (D'Arcy-Lameta et al., 2006). Wheat genotypes show differential APX expression under water deficit. cAPX1 was up-regulated in both genotypes, sAPX2 only in sensitive, while tAPX and cAPX2 only in the tolerant type (Sečenji et al., 2009). The tAPX was down-regulated after 15 days of stress in rice, several other isoforms were up-regulated, still some microsomal isoforms were slightly or not affected at all (Rosa et al., 2010). This represents a differential expression of APXs in different species and various stresses.
Expression of APXs Under Metal Toxicity
Soil contamination with heavy metal ions is a major issue hindering crop productivity. Induced expression of APXs have been observed under Cadmium and Arsenic stress in leaves of A. thaliana, Solanum nigrum, and Brassica juncea while it was reduced in B. napus (Smeets et al., 2008; Khan et al., 2009; Markovska et al., 2009; Nouairi et al., 2009; Pinto et al., 2009). In case of Copper stress in Elsholtzia splendens, there was increased expression of APX in leaves while in Withania somnifera it was variable according to concentration of metal ions (Peng et al., 2006; Khatun et al., 2008). In Nicotiana tabacum and Typha angustifolia, cadmium stress led to changed and unchanged expression of APX isoforms respectively while in Typha leaves, chromium and lead stresses did not induce any change in APX expression (Bah et al., 2011). Cadmium stress in Zea mays led to variable expression of APX (Ekmekçi et al., 2008). In coffee cells, lower concentrations of Cadmium induced activity of APX but higher concentrations did not cause any change after 24 h. While nickel increased APX activity with little difference between two extreme concentrations (Gomes-Junior et al., 2006a,b). Aluminum exposure also induces activity of almost all APX isoforms in rice. cAPX1/2 double mutants were normal and had increased tolerance to high concentrations (Sharma and Dubey, 2007; Rosa et al., 2010). This heavy metal increases activity of cAPX in pea, at higher concentrations and longer durations while it declines and becomes constant beyond it (Panda and Matsumoto, 2010). Iron induces activity of cAPX in de-rooted bean plants and tobacco plants with deficient cAPX were sensitive to iron (Pekker et al., 2002). Copper and cadmium increased APX activity in tall fescue plants over-expressing APX compared to control while arsenic decreased its activity in both transgenic and control (Lee S. H. et al., 2007). Lead increased APX activity in seedlings of Eichhornia crassipes (Malar et al., 2014). Cadmium chloride increased APX activity in both salt tolerant and sensitive rice varieties with a higher activity in the former (Roychoudhury et al., 2012; Malar et al., 2014). Similar increase in APX activity was seen in Vigna radiata under Cadmium Chloride stress (Roychoudhury and Ghosh, 2013). Doubled stress of salt and lead on V. radiata seedlings resulted in increased APX activity (Siddiqui, 2013). Therefore, we have seen an important role of APXs in protecting plants against heavy metal stress in soil from different scientific reports.
Summary and Future Perspectives
From the above literature, it is amply clear that ascorbate peroxidase constitutes one of the most important component of the cellular antioxidant defense, and plays a crucial role in regulating the levels ROS in plants when exposed to a variety of environmental stresses. The fact that APX constitutes the first line of defense against ROS is signified by the fact that H2O2 at low levels is beneficial to the plant system, as it acts as a secondary messenger in initiating cellular defense pathway. The same molecule can be a cause of oxidative injury to the plant if accumulated at higher concentrations. The role of APX in maintaining redox homeostasis is supported by the presence of specific isoforms of the enzyme at different sub-cellular locations. The quantitative expression of APX regulates how the plant system adapts to different types of environmental stresses, at the cellular and molecular level by interacting with various signaling molecules. The multitude of regulatory processes and molecules present in the cell helps ascorbate peroxidase enzyme to cross talk with various other antioxidant enzymes which is essentially required for a meaningful antioxidant defense system. Further, the mutant studies indicate that APX also has a complex compensatory relationship with other enzymes of the antioxidant pathway. However, the enigma created by the presence of different isoforms of APX needs to be resolved and further studies are required to delineate the genetic regulation of APX gene expression, in response to different types of stresses. This will help in designing better strategies for stress tolerance in plants.
SP prepared manuscript, formulated the idea, wrote the article, attached references, figures, table, and final proof reading. DF and AA formulated the idea, wrote the article, re-written and edited the manuscript, attached references, figures, table, and final proof reading. TS reproved and reorganized the manuscript. DJ helped in manuscript preparation. TK helped in guiding the article. YN helped in guiding the article. SA gave the idea of Ascorbate peroxidase (Plant APX) Review article; helped in guiding the article. MR gave the guidance for framework and final evaluation of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
SP thanks SERB for the PDF/2015/000230/LS grant. The authors also thank DST, CSIR, and DBT for INSPIRE fellowship to DF, SRF, to AA and SRF to DJ, respectively. The author SA is thankful to DBT for financial support in the form of PMS-Phase-II grant. The authors finally extend a big thanks to our reviewers for their critical comments and continuous support and patience.
Asada, K. (1999). The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 601–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.601
Badawi, G. H., Yamauchi, Y., Kawano, N., Tanaka, K., and Tanaka, K. (2004). Enhanced tolerance to water deficit and high salt stress by overexpressing superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 45, 806. doi: 10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.00308.x
Bah, A. M., Dai, H., Zhao, J., Sun, H., Cao, F., Zhang, G., et al. (2011). Effects of cadmium, chromium and lead on growth, metal uptake and antioxidative capacity in Typha angustifolia. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 142, 77–92. doi: 10.1007/s12011-010-8746-6
Bonifacio, A., Martins, M. O., Ribeiro, C. W., Fontenele, A. V., Carvalho, F. E., Margis-Pinheiro, M., et al. (2011). Role of peroxidases in the compensation of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase knockdown in rice plants under abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 34, 1705–1722. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02366.x
Cakmak, I., and Marschner, H. (1992). Magnesium deficiency and high light intensity enhance activities of superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase in bean leaves. Plant Physiol. 98, 1222–1227. doi: 10.1104/pp.98.4.1222
Camillo, L. R., Filadelfo, C. R., Monzani, P. S., Corrêa, R. X., Gramacho, K. P., Micheli, F., et al. (2013). Tc-cAPX, a cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase of Theobroma cacao L. engaged in the interaction with Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causing agent of witches' broom disease. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 73, 254–265. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.10.009
Caverzan, A., Passaia, G., Rosa, S. B., Ribeiro, C. W., Lazzarotto, F., and Margis-Pinheiro, M. (2012). Plant responses to stresses: role of ascorbate peroxidase in the antioxidant protection. Genet. Mol. Biol. 35, 1011–1019. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572012000600016
Chen, Y., Cai, J., Yang, F. X., Zhou, B., and Zhou, L. R. (2015). Ascorbate peroxidase from Jatropha curcas enhances salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Genet. Mol. Res. 14, 4879–4889. doi: 10.4238/2015.May.11.20
Chew, O., Whelan, J., and Millar, A. H. (2003). Molecular definition of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in Arabidopsis mitochondria reveals dual targeting of antioxidant defenses in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 46869–46877. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307525200
Chiang, C. M., Chen, L. F. O., Shih, S. W., and Lin, K. H. (2015). Expression of eggplant ascorbate peroxidase increases the tolerance of transgenic rice plants to flooding stress. J. Plant Biochem. Biotech. 24, 257–267. doi: 10.1007/s13562-014-0265-7
Cramer, G. R., Ergül, A., Grimplet, J., Tillett, R. L., Tattersall, E. A., Bohlman, M. C., et al. (2007). Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Funct. Int. Genomics 7, 111–134. doi: 10.1007/s10142-006-0039-y
Cruz, F. J. R., Castro, G. L. S., Júnior, D. D. S., and Pinheiro, H. A. (2013). Exogenous glycine betaine modulates ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activities and prevent lipid peroxidation in mild water-stressed Carapa guianensis plants. Photosynthetica 51, 102–108. doi: 10.1007/s11099-013-0004-7
D'Arcy-Lameta, A., Ferrari-Iliou, R., Coutour-Ansel, D., Pham-Thi, A. T., and Zuily-Fodil, Y. (2006). Isolation and characterization of four ascorbate peroxidase cdnas responsive to water deficit in cowpea leaves. Ann. Bot. 97, 133–140. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcj010
Dąbrowska, G., Kata, A., Goc, A., Szechyńska-Hebda, M., and Skrzypek, E. (2007). Characteristics of the plant ascorbate peroxidase family. Acta Biol. Cracow. Ser. Bot. 49, 7–17. Available online at: http://www2.ib.uj.edu.pl/abc/pdf/49_1/01dabrow.pdf
Danna, C. H., Bartoli, C. G., Sacco, F., Ingala, L. R., Santa-María, G. E., Guiamet, J. J., et al. (2003). Thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidase mutant exhibits impaired electron transport and photosynthetic activity. Plant Physiol. 132, 2116–2125. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.021717
Das, K., and Roychoudhury, A. (2014). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front. Environ. Sci. 2:53. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00053
Davletova, S., Rizhsky, L., Liang, H., Shengqiang, Z., Oliver, D. J., Coutu, J., et al. (2005). Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 is a central component of the reactive oxygen gene network of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17, 268–281. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.026971
Dias, M. C., Azevedo, C., Costa, M., Pinto, G., and Santos, C. (2014). Melia azedarach plants show tolerance properties to water shortage treatment: an ecophysiological study. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 75, 123–127. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.12.014
Diaz-Vivancos, P., Faize, M., Barba-Espin, G., Faize, L., Petri, C., Hernández, J. A., et al. (2013). Ectopic expression of cytosolic superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase leads to salt stress tolerance in transgenic plums. Plant Biotech. J. 11, 976–985. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12090
Duan, M., Feng, H. L., Wang, L. Y., Li, D., and Meng, Q. W. (2012). Overexpression of thylakoidal ascorbate peroxidase shows enhanced resistance to chilling stress in tomato. J. Plant Physiol. 169, 867–877. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.02.012
Duque, A. S., Farinha, A. P., da Silva, A. B., de Almeida, A. M., Santos, D., da Silva, J. M., et al. (2013). “Chapter 3 Abiotic stress responses in plants: unraveling the complexity of genes and networks to survive,” in Abiotic Stress: Plant Responses and Applications in Agriculture, eds K. Vahdati and C. Leslie (Croatia: INTECH Open), 49–102. doi: 10.5772/45842
Ekmekçi, Y., Tanyolac, D., and Ayhan, B. (2008). Effects of cadmium on antioxidant enzyme and photosynthetic activities in leaves of two maize cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 165, 600–611. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.01.017
Eltelib, H. A., Fujikawa, Y., and Esaka, M. (2012). Overexpression of the acerola (Malpighia glabra) monodehydroascorbate reductase gene in transgenic tobacco plants results in increased ascorbate levels and enhanced tolerance to salt stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 78, 295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2011.08.005
Faize, M., Burgos, L., Faize, L., Piqueras, A., Nicolas, E., Barba-Espin, G., et al. (2011). Involvement of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase and Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase for improved tolerance against drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 2599–2613. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq432
Fryer, M. J., Ball, L., Oxborough, K., Karpinski, S., Mullineaux, P. M., and Baker, N. R. (2003). Control of ascorbate peroxidase 2 expression by hydrogen peroxide and leaf water status during excess light stress reveals a functional organisation of Arabidopsis leaves. Plant J. 33, 691–705. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01656.x
Gechev, T. S., Van Breusegem, F., Stone, J. M., Denev, I., and Laloi, C. (2006). Reactive oxygen species as signals that modulate plant stress responses and programmed cell death. Bioessays 28, 1091–1101. doi: 10.1002/bies.20493
Gomes-Junior, R. A., Moldes, C. A., Delite, F. S., Gratão, P. L., and Mazzafera, P. (2006a). Nickel elicits a fast antioxidant response in Coffea arabica cells. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 44, 420–429. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.06.002
Gomes-Junior, R. A., Moldes, C. A., Delite, F. S., Pompeu, G. B., Gratão, P. L., Mazzafera, P., et al. (2006b). Antioxidant metabolism of coffee cell suspension cultures in response to cadmium. Chemosphere 65, 1330–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.056
Gómez, J. M., Jiménez, A., Olmos, E., and Sevilla, F. (2004). Location and effects of long-term NaCl stress on superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes of pea (Pisum sativum cv. Puget) chloroplasts. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 119–130. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh013
Guan, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, X., Takano, T., and Liu, S. (2015). A peroxisomal APX from Puccinellia tenuiflora improves the abiotic stress tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana through decreasing of H2O2 accumulation. J. Plant Physiol. 175, 183–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.10.020
Gueta-Dahan, Y., Yaniv, Z., Zilinskas, B. A., and Ben-Hayyim, G. (1997). Salt and oxidative stress: similar and specific responses and their relation to salt tolerance in citrus. Planta 203, 460–469. doi: 10.1007/s004250050215
Hirooka, S., Misumi, O., Yoshida, M., Mori, T., Nishida, K., Yagisawa, F., et al. (2009). Expression of the Cyanidioschyzon merolae stromal ascorbate peroxidase in Arabidopsis thaliana enhances thermotolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 28, 1881–1893. doi: 10.1007/s00299-009-0791-2
Hong, C.-Y., Hsu, Y. T., Tsai, Y.-C., and Kao, C. H. (2007). Expression of ascorbate peroxidase 8 in roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings in response to NaCl. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 3273–3283. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm174
Huseynova, I. M., Aliyeva, D. R., and Aliyev, J. A. (2014). Subcellular localization and responses of superoxide dismutase isoforms in local wheat varieties subjected to continuous soil drought. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 81, 54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.01.018
Ishikawa, T., Morimoto, Y., Madhusudhan, R., Sawa, Y., Shibata, H., Yabuta, Y., et al. (2005). Acclimation to diverse environmental stresses caused by a suppression of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 46, 1264–1271. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci135
Ishikawa, T., Yoshimura, K., Sakai, K., Tamoi, M., and Takeda, T. (1998). Molecular characterization and physiological role of a glyoxysome-bound ascorbate peroxidase from spinach. Plant Cell Physiol. 39, 23–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029285
Jiang, G., Yin, D., Zhao, J., Chen, H., Guo, L., Zhu, L., et al. (2016). The rice thylakoid membrane-bound ascorbate peroxidase OsAPX8 functions in tolerance to bacterial blight. Sci. Rep. 6:26104. doi: 10.1038/srep26104
Jimenez, A., and Hernandez, J. (1997). Evidence for the presence of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in mitochondria and peroxisomes of pea leaves. Plant Physiol. 114, 275–284. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.1.275
Kangasjärvi, S., Lepistö, A., Hännikäinen, K., Piippo, M., Luomala, E. M., Aro, E. M., et al. (2008). Diverse roles for chloroplast stromal and thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidases in plant stress responses. Biochem. J. 412, 275–285. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080030
Kapoor, D. (2015). Redox homeostasis in plants under abiotic stress: role of electron carriers, energy metabolism mediators and proteinaceous thiols. Front. Environ. Sci. 3:13. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00013
Karpinski, S., Reynolds, H., Karpinska, B., Wingsle, G., Creissen, G., and Mullineaux, P. (1999). Systemic signaling and acclimation in response to excess excitation energy in Arabidopsis. Science 284, 654–657. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5414.654
Kausar, R., Hossain, Z., and Makino, T. (2012). Characterization of ascorbate peroxidase in soybean under flooding and drought stresses. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39, 10573–10579. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1945-9
Kawakami, S., Matsumoto, Y., Matsunaga, A., Mayama, S., and Mizuno, M. (2002). Molecular cloning of ascorbate peroxidase in potato tubers and its response during storage at low temperature. Plant Sci. 163, 829–836. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00232-7
Khan, I., Ahmad, A., and Iqbal, M. (2009). Modulation of antioxidant defense system for arsenic detoxification in Indian mustard. Ecotoxic. Environ. Saf. 72, 626–634. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.11.016
Khatun, S., Babar, M., Hahn, E., and Paek, K. (2008). Copper toxicity in Withania somnifera: growth and antioxidant enzymes responses of in vitro grown plants. J. Environ. Exp. Bot. 64, 279–285. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.02.004
Kornyeyev, D., Logan, B. A., Allen, R. D., and Holaday, A. S. (2003). Effect of chloroplastic overproduction of ascorbate peroxidase on photosynthesis and photoprotection in cotton leaves subjected to low temperature photoinhibition. Plant Sci. 165, 1033–1041. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00294-2
Koussevitzky, S., Suzuki, N., Huntington, S., Armijo, L., Sha, W., Cortes, D., et al. (2008). Ascorbate peroxidase 1 plays a key role in the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to stress combination. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 34197–34203. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806337200
Kwon, S. Y., Jeong, Y. J., Lee, H. S., Kim, J. S., Cho, K. Y., Allen, R. D., et al. (2002). Enhanced tolerances of transgenic tobacco plants expressing both superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in chloroplasts against methyl viologen-mediated oxidative stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 873–882. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00870.x
Lee, S. H., Ahsan, N., Lee, K. W., Kim, D. H., Lee, D. G., Kwak, S. S., et al. (2007). Simultaneous overexpression of both CuZn superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in transgenic tall fescue plants confers increased tolerance to a wide range of abiotic stresses. J. Plant Physiol. 164, 1626–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.01.003
Lee, Y. P., Kim, S. H., Bang, J. W., Lee, H. S., Kwak, S. S., and Kwon, S. Y. (2007). Enhanced tolerance to oxidative stress in transgenic tobacco plants expressing three antioxidant enzymes in chloroplasts. Plant Cell Rep. 26, 591–598. doi: 10.1007/s00299-006-0253-z
Li, M., Ji, L., Yang, X., Meng, Q., and Guo, S. (2012). The protective mechanisms of CaHSP26 in transgenic tobacco to alleviate photoinhibition of PSII during chilling stress. Plant Cell Rep. 31, 1969–1979. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1309-x
Li, Y. J., Hai, R. L., Du, X. H., Jiang, X. N., and Lu, H. (2009). Over-expression of a Populus peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase (PpAPX) gene in tobacco plants enhances stress tolerance. Plant Breed. 128, 404–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01593.x
Lim, S., Kim, Y. H., Kim, S. H., Kwon, S. Y., Lee, H. S., Kim, J. S., et al. (2007). Enhanced tolerance of transgenic sweetpotato plants that express both CuZnSOD and APX in chloroplasts to methyl viologen-mediated oxidative stress and chilling. Mol. Breed. 19, 227–239. doi: 10.1007/s11032-006-9051-0
Liu, Z., Bao, H., Cai, J., Han, J., and Zhou, L. (2013). A novel thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase from Jatropha curcas enhances salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 171–185. doi: 10.3390/ijms15010171
Lu, Z., Liu, D., and Liu, S. (2007). Two rice cytosolic ascorbate peroxidases differentially improve salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 26, 1909–1917. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0395-7
Malar, S., Vikram, S. S., Favas, P. J. C., and Perumal, V. (2014). Lead heavy metal toxicity induced changes on growth and antioxidative enzymes level in water hyacinths [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.)]. Bot. Stud. 55, 54. doi: 10.1186/s40529-014-0054-6
Mano, J. I., Ohno, C., Domae, Y., and Asada, K. (2001). Chloroplastic ascorbate peroxidase is the primary target of methylviologen-induced photooxidative stress in spinach leaves: its relevance to monodehydroascorbate radical detected with in vivo ESR. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1504, 275–287. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(00)00256-5
Markovska, Y. K., Gorinova, N. I., Nedkovska, M. P., and Miteva, K. M. (2009). Cadmium-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in Brassica juncea plants. Biol. Plant. 53, 151–154. doi: 10.1007/s10535-009-0023-1
Maruta, T., Tanouchi, A., Tamoi, M., Yabuta, Y., Yoshimura, K., Ishikawa, T., et al. (2010). Arabidopsis chloroplastic ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes play a dual role in photoprotection and gene regulation under photooxidative stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 190–200. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp177
Menezes-Benavente, L., Teixeira, F. K., Kamei, C. L. A., and Margis-Pinheiro, M. (2004). Salt stress induces altered expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes in seedlings of a Brazilian indica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci. 166, 323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.001
Miller, G., Suzuki, N., Ciftci-Yilmaz, S., and Mittler, R. (2010). Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 453–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x
Miller, G., Suzuki, N., Rizhsky, L., Hegie, A., Koussevitzky, S., and Mittler, R. (2007a). Double mutants deficient in cytosolic and thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase reveal a complex mode of interaction between reactive oxygen species, plant development, and response to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 144, 1777–1785. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.101436
Miller, G., Suzuki, N., Rizhsky, L., Hegie, A., Koussevitzky, S., and Mittler, R. (2007b). Double mutants deficient in cytosolic and thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase reveal a complex mode of interaction between reactive oxygen species, plant development, and response to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 144, 1777–1785. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.101436
Mittova, V., Tal, M., Volokita, M., and Guy, M. (2003). Up-regulation of the leaf mitochondrial and peroxisomal antioxidative systems in response to salt-induced oxidative stress in the wild salt-tolerant tomato species Lycopersicon pennellii. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 845–856. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01016.x
Morita, S., Kaminaka, H., Masumura, T., and Tanaka, K. (1999). Induction of rice cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase mRNA by oxidative stress; the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in oxidative stress signalling. Plant Cell Physiol. 40, 417–422. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029557
Murgia, I., Tarantino, D., Vannini, C., Bracale, M., Carravieri, S., and Soave, C. (2004). Arabidopsis thaliana plants overexpressing thylakoidal ascorbate peroxidase show increased resistance to Paraquat-induced photooxidative stress and to nitric oxide-induced cell death. Plant J. 38, 940–953. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02092.x
Nageshbabu, R., and Jyothi, M. N. (2013). Profile of small interfering RNAs from french bean Phaseolus vulgaris under abiotic stress conditions. Int. J Pharm. Bio. Sci. 4, 176–185. Available online at: http://www.ijpbs.net/cms/php/upload/2243_pdf.pdf
Narendra, S., Venkataramani, S., Shen, G., Wang, J., Pasapula, V., Lin, Y., et al. (2006). The Arabidopsis ascorbate peroxidase 3 is a peroxisomal membrane-bound antioxidant enzyme and is dispensable for Arabidopsis growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 3033–3042. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl060
Nazar, R., Iqbal, N., Syeed, S., and Khan, N. A. (2011). Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and antioxidant metabolism differentially in two mungbean cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 807–815. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.11.001
Noctor, G., Veljovic-Jovanovic, S., and Foyer, C. H. (2000). Peroxide processing in photosynthesis: antioxidant coupling and redox signalling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 355, 1465–1475. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0707
Nouairi, I., Ammar, W. B., Youssef, N. B., Miled, D. D. B., Ghorbal, M. H., and Zarrouk, M. (2009). Antioxidant defense system in leaves of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and rape (Brassica napus) under cadmium stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 31, 237–247. doi: 10.1007/s11738-008-0224-9
Panda, S. K., and Matsumoto, H. (2010). Changes in antioxidant gene expression and induction of oxidative stress in pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Al stress. Biometals 23, 753–762. doi: 10.1007/s10534-010-9342-0
Park, S. Y., Ryu, S. H., Jang, I. C., Kwon, S. Y., Kim, J. G., and Kwak, S. S. (2004). Molecular cloning of a cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase cDNA from cell cultures of sweetpotato and its expression in response to stress. Mol. Genet. Genomics 271, 339–346. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-0986-8
Pekker, I., Tel-Or, E., and Mittler, R. (2002). Reactive oxygen intermediates and glutathione regulate the expression of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase during iron-mediated oxidative stress in bean. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 429–438. doi: 10.1023/A:1015554616358
Peng, H.-Y., Yang, X.-E., Yang, M.-J., and Tian, S.-K. (2006). Responses of antioxidant enzyme system to copper toxicity and copper detoxification in the leaves of Elsholtzia splendens. J. Plant Nutr. 29, 1619–1635. doi: 10.1080/01904160600851478
Pinhero, R. G., Rao, M. V., Paliyath, C., Murr, P., and Fletcher, R. A. (1997). Changes in activities of antioxidant enzymes and their relationship to genetic and paclobutrazolh induced chilling tolerance of maize seedlings. Plant Physiol. 114, 695–704. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.2.695
Pinto, A. P., Alves, A. S., Candeias, A. J., Cardoso, A. I., de Varennes, A., Martins, L. L., et al. (2009). Cadmium accumulation and antioxidative defenses in Brassica juncea L. Czern, Nicotiana tabacum L. and Solanum nigrum L. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 89, 661–676. doi: 10.1080/03067310902962585
Pnueli, L., Liang, H., Rozenberg, M., and Mittler, R. (2003). Growth suppression, altered stomatal responses, and augmented induction of heat shock proteins in cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (Apx1)-deficient Arabidopsis plants. Plant J. 34, 187–203. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01715.x
Polle, A. (2001). Dissecting the superoxide dismutase-ascorbate-glutathione-pathway in chloroplasts by metabolic modeling. Computer simulations as a step towards flux analysis. Plant Physiol. 126, 445–462. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.1.445
Qian, H., Peng, X., Han, X., Ren, J., Sun, L., and Fu, Z. (2013). Comparison of the toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver ions on the growth of terrestrial plant model Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Environ. Sci. 25, 1947–1956. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60301-5
Rao, M. V., Paliyath, G., and Ormrod, D. P. (1996). Ultraviolet-B and Ozone-lnduced biochemical changes in antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 110, 125–136. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.1.125
Rizhsky, L., Hallak-Herr, E., Van Breusegem, F., Rachmilevitch, S., Barr, J. E., Rodermel, S., et al. (2002). Double antisense plants lacking ascorbate peroxidase and catalase are less sensitive to oxidative stress than single antisense plants lacking ascorbate peroxidase or catalase. Plant J. 32, 329–342. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01427.x
Rosa, S. B., Caverzan, A., Teixeira, F. K., Lazzarotto, F., Silveira, J. A., Ferreira-Silva, S. L., et al. (2010). Cytosolic APX knockdown indicates an ambiguous redox responses in rice. Phytochemistry 71, 548–558. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.01.003
Roychoudhury, A., Basu, S., and Sengupta, D. N. (2012). Antioxidants and stress-related metabolites in the seedlings of two indica rice varieties exposed to cadmium chloride toxicity. Acta Physiol. Plant. 34, 835–847. doi: 10.1007/s11738-011-0881-y
Roychoudhury, A., and Ghosh, S. (2013). Physiological and biochemical responses of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) to varying concentrations of cadmium chloride or sodium chloride. Unique J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 1, 11–21. Available online at: http://ujconline.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-UJPBS-1345-Rs.pdf
Sato, Y., Masuta, Y., and Saito, K. (2011). Enhanced chilling tolerance at the booting stage in rice by transgenic overexpression of the ascorbate peroxidase gene, OsAPXa. Plant Cell Rep. 30, 399–406. doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0985-7
Saxena, S. C., Joshi, P., Grimm, B., and, Arora, S. (2011). Alleviation of ultraviolet-C induced oxidative through overexpression of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase. Biologia 66, 1052–1059. doi: 10.2478/s11756-011-0120-4
Scandalios, J. G. (2005). Oxidative stress: molecular perception and transduction of signals triggering antioxidant gene defenses. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 38, 995–1014. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2005000700003
Sečenji, M., Hideg, É., Bebes, A., and Györgyey, J. (2009). Transcriptional differences in gene families of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in wheat during mild water deficit. Plant Cell Rep. 29, 37–50. doi: 10.1007/s00299-009-0796-x
Shalata, A., Mittova, V., Volokita, M., Guy, M., and Tal, M. (2001). Response of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt-tolerant relative Lycopersicon pennellii to salt-dependent oxidative stress: the root antioxidative system. Physiol. Plant 112, 487–494. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120405.x
Sharma, P., and Dubey, R. S. (2007). Involvement of oxidative stress and role of antioxidative defense system in growing rice seedlings exposed to toxic concentrations of aluminum. Plant Cell Rep. 26, 2027–2038. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0416-6
Sharma, P., Jha, A. B., Dubey, R. S., and Pessarakli, M. (2012). Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot. 2012, 1–26. doi: 10.1155/2012/217037
Shi, W. M., Muramoto, Y., Ueda, A., and Takabe, T. (2001). Cloning of peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase gene from barley and enhanced thermotolerance by overexpressing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 273, 23–27. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00566-2
Shigeoka, S., Ishikawa, T., Tamoi, M., Miyagawa, Y., Takeda, T., Yabuta, Y., et al. (2002). Regulation and function of ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1305–1319. doi: 10.1093/jxb/53.372.1305
Singh, N., Mishra, A., and Jha, B. (2014). Ectopic over-expression of peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase (SbpAPX) gene confers salt stress tolerance in transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Gene 547, 119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.06.037
Smeets, K., Ruytinx, J., Semane, B., Van Belleghem, F., Remans, T., Van Sanden, S., et al. (2008). Cadmium-induced transcriptional and enzymatic alterations related to oxidative stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 63, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.028
Sofo, A., Tuzio, A. C., Dichio, B., and Xiloyannis, C. (2005). Influence of water deficit and rewatering on the components of the ascorbate – glutathione cycle in four interspecific Prunus hybrids. Plant Sci. 169, 403–412. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.04.004
Song, X. S., Hu, W. H., Mao, W. H., Ogweno, J. O., Zhou, Y. H., and Yu, J. Q. (2005). Response of ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes and ascorbate regeneration system to abiotic stresses in Cucumis sativus L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 43, 1082–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.11.003
Sun, W.-H., Duan, M., Shu, D.-F., Yang, S., and Meng, Q.-W. (2010). Over-expression of StAPX in tobacco improves seed germination and increases early seedling tolerance to salinity and osmotic stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 29, 917–926. doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0878-9
Tang, L., Kwon, S. Y., Kim, S. H., Kim, J. S., Choi, J. S., Cho, K. Y., et al. (2006). Enhanced tolerance of transgenic potato plants expressing both superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in chloroplasts against oxidative stress and high temperature. Plant Cell Rep. 25, 1380–1386. doi: 10.1007/s00299-006-0199-1
Teixeira, F. K., Menezes-Benavente, L., Galvão, V. C., Margis, R., and Margis-Pinheiro, M. (2006). Rice ascorbate peroxidase gene family encodes functionally diverse isoforms localized in different subcellular compartments. Planta 224, 300–314. doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-0214-8
Teixeira, F. K., Menezes-benavente, L., Margis, R., and Margis-Pinheiro, M. (2004). Analysis of the molecular evolutionary history of the ascorbate peroxidase gene family: inferences from the rice genome. J. Mol. Evol. 59, 761–770. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-2666-z
Torsethaugen, C., Pitcher, L. H., Zilinskas, B. A., and Pell, E. J. (1997). Overproduction of Ascorbate peroxidase in the tobacco chloroplast does not provide protection against ozone. Plant Physiol. 114, 529–537. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.2.529
Vacca, R. A., de Pinto, M. C., Valenti, D., Passarella, S., Marra, E., and De Gara, L. (2004). Production of reactive oxygen species, alteration of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase, and impairment of mitochondrial metabolism are early events in heat shock-induced programmed cell death in tobacco Bright-Yellow 2 cells. Plant Physiol. 134, 1100–1112. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.035956
Wang, J., Zhang, H., and Allen, R. D. (1999). Over-expression of an Arabidopsis peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase gene in tobacco increases protection against oxidative stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 40, 725–732. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029599
Wang, Y., Wisniewski, M., Meilan, R., Cui, M., Webb, R., and Fuchigami, L. (2005). Overexpression of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase in tomato confers tolerance to chilling and salt stress. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 130, 167–173. Available online at: https://www.ashspublications.org/content/130/2/167.full.pdf+html
Weisany, W., Sohrabi, Y., Heidari, G., Siosemardeh, A., and Ghassemi-Golezani, K. (2012). Changes in antioxidant enzymes activity and plant performance by salinity stress and zinc application in soybean (‘Glycine max’ L.). Plant Omics 5, 60. Available online at: http://www.pomics.com/sohrabi_5_2_2012_60_67.pdf
Xu, J., Yang, J., Duan, X., Jiang, Y., and Zhang, P. (2014). Increased expression of native cytosolic Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase improves tolerance to oxidative and chilling stresses in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). BMC Plant Biol. 14:208. doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0208-4
Yabuta, Y., Motoki, T., Yoshimura, K., Takeda, T., Ishikawa, T., and Shigeoka, S. (2002). Thylakoid membrane-bound ascorbate peroxidase is a limiting factor of antioxidative systems under photo-oxidative stress. Plant J. 32, 915–925. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01476.x
Yamane, K., Mitsuya, S., Taniguchi, M., and Miyake, H. (2010). Transcription profiles of genes encoding catalase and ascorbate peroxidase in the rice leaf tissues under salinity. Plant Prod. Sci. 13, 164–168. doi: 10.1626/pps.13.164
Yan, H., Li, Q., Park, S. C., Wang, X., Liu, Y. J., Zhang, Y. G., et al. (2016). Overexpression of CuZnSOD and APX enhance salt stress tolerance in sweet potato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 109, 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.09.003
Yoshimura, K., Yabuta, Y., Ishikawa, T., and Shigeoka, S. (2000). Expression of spinach ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes in response to oxidative stresses. Plant Physiol. 123, 223–234. doi: 10.1104/pp.123.1.223
Yun, K. Y., Park, M. R., Mohanty, B., Herath, V., Xu, F., Mauleon, R., et al. (2010). Transcriptional regulatory network triggered by oxidative signals configures the early response mechanisms of japonica rice to chilling stress. BMC Plant Biol. 10:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-16
Zarei, S., Ehsanpour, A. A., and Abbaspour, J. (2012). The role of over-expression of P5CS gene on proline, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase activity and lipid peroxidation of transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) plant under in vitro drought stress. J. Cell Mol. Res. 4, 43–49. doi: 10.22067/jcmr.v4i1.18249
Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Wen, F., Yao, D., Wang, L., Guo, J., et al. (2014). A novel rice C2H2-type zinc finger protein, ZFP36, is a key player involved in abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defense and oxidative stress tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 5795–5809. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru313
Zhang, H., Wang, J., Nickel, U., Allen, R. D., and Goodman, H. M. (1997). Cloning and expression of an Arabidopsis gene encoding a putative peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase. Plant Mol. Biol. 34, 967–971. doi: 10.1023/A:1005814109732
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q., Wu, J., Zheng, X., Zheng, S., and Sun, X. (2013). Gene knockout study reveals that cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 2 (osapx2) plays a critical role in growth and reproduction in rice under drought, salt and cold stresses. PLoS ONE 8:e57472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057472
Zhu, Y., Zuo, M., Liang, Y., Jiang, M., Zhang, J., Scheller, H. V., et al. (2013). MAP65-1a positively regulates H2O2 amplification and enhances brassinosteroid-induced antioxidant defense in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 3787–3802. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert215
Keywords: APX, ROS, abiotic stress, antioxidant, ASC–GSH pathway
Citation: Pandey S, Fartyal D, Agarwal A, Shukla T, James D, Kaul T, Negi YK, Arora S and Reddy MK (2017) Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants: Myriad Roles of Ascorbate Peroxidase. Front. Plant Sci. 8:581. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00581
Received: 20 June 2016; Accepted: 30 March 2017;
Published: 20 April 2017.
Edited by:Marcelo Menossi Menossi, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil
Reviewed by:Taras P. Pasternak, Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Germany
Shuijin Zhu, Zhejiang University, China
Copyright © 2017 Pandey, Fartyal, Agarwal, Shukla, James, Kaul, Negi, Arora and Reddy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Saurabh Pandey, firstname.lastname@example.org
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.