Original Research ARTICLE
Katanin Effects on Dynamics of Cortical Microtubules and Mitotic Arrays in Arabidopsis thaliana Revealed by Advanced Live-Cell Imaging
- Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
Katanin is the only microtubule severing protein identified in plants so far. Previous studies have documented its role in regulating cortical microtubule organization during cell growth and morphogenesis. Although, some cell division defects are reported in KATANIN mutants, it is not clear whether or how katanin activity may affect microtubule dynamics in interphase cells, as well as the progression of mitosis and cytokinesis and the orientation of cell division plane (CDP). For this reason, we characterized microtubule organization and dynamics in growing and dividing cotyledon cells of Arabidopsis ktn1-2 mutant devoid of KATANIN 1 activity. In interphase epidermal cells of ktn1-2 cortical microtubules exhibited aberrant and largely isotropic organization, reduced bundling and showed excessive branched microtubule formation. End-wise microtubule dynamics were not much affected, although a significantly slower rate of microtubule growth was measured in the ktn1-2 mutant where microtubule severing was completely abolished. KATANIN 1 depletion also brought about significant changes in preprophase microtubule band (PPB) organization and dynamics. In this case, many PPBs exhibited unisided organization and splayed appearance while in most cases they were broader than those of wild type cells. By recording PPB maturation, it was observed that PPBs in the mutant narrowed at a much slower pace compared to those in Col-0. The form of the mitotic spindle and the phragmoplast was not much affected in ktn1-2, however, the dynamics of both processes showed significant differences compared to wild type. In general, both mitosis and cytokinesis were considerably delayed in the mutant. Additionally, the mitotic spindle and the phragmoplast exhibited extensive rotational motions with the equatorial plane of the spindle being essentially uncoupled from the division plane set by the PPB. However, at the onset of its formation the phragmoplast undergoes rotational motion rectifying the expansion of the cell plate to match the original cell division plane. Conclusively, KATANIN 1 contributes to microtubule dynamics during interphase, regulates PPB formation and maturation and is involved in the positioning of the mitotic spindle and the phragmoplast.
The diversity of plant cell forms and sizes, largely owes to the capacity of plant cells to organize intricate patterns of cytoskeletal elements and particularly microtubules. Plant cortical microtubules control cellulose deposition during cell growth and morphogenesis (Paredez et al., 2006; Lei et al., 2015) and are also involved in environmental plant responses (Dovgalyuk et al., 2003; Nyporko et al., 2003). Moreover, mitotic microtubule arrays regulate cell division plane orientation by assembling the preprophase microtubule band (PPB; Rasmussen et al., 2011) and finally drive the partitioning of genetic material between two daughter cells following the processes of mitosis and cytokinesis.
The decision between symmetric and asymmetric division is highlighted by the respective symmetric or asymmetric PPB positioning (Rasmussen et al., 2011). PPB is formed during interphase by restructuring of the diffuse cortical microtubule system into a broad cortical microtubule ring that progressively narrows and finally disassembles at the mitosis onset coincidentally with nuclear envelope breakdown (Van Damme et al., 2007). The process of cortical microtubule rearrangement to the formation of the PPB is poorly understood, but it is consistent with mechanisms generally involved in microtubule organization including hybrid treadmilling and dynamic instability (Shaw et al., 2003; Komis et al., 2014), microtubule bundling (Hamada, 2014), and nucleation (Janski et al., 2012; Fishel and Dixit, 2013). Such processes are driven by microtubule associated proteins which bind to microtubule walls or tips and regulate microtubule dynamics, interactions, and/or microtubule positioning (Hamada, 2014).
Spindle assembly occurs shortly before the complete disassembly of the PPB and assumes its bipolarity quite early. After PPB and nuclear envelope are completely disassembled the mitotic spindle interacts with chromosome kinetochores and partitions sister chromatids to two equivalent groups. Afterwards, the two chromosome groups are physically separated by the cell plate, the daughter wall which is built centrifugally through a microtubule based machinery, the phragmoplast. It is notable that throughout mitosis and cytokinesis the equatorial plane of the spindle and the plane of cell plate expansion are very tightly related to the plane set earlier by the PPB (Rasmussen et al., 2011).
The above brief description of plant microtubule properties, reveals a very dynamic structure that undergoes large scale transitions in relatively short time. The cortical microtubule array which is responsible for cell growth directionality and differentiation, can reorganize promptly after the perception of hormonal (Soga et al., 2010) or physical (Blancaflor and Hasenstein, 1993, 1995a,b; Krasylenko et al., 2012; Uyttewaal et al., 2012; Muratov and Baulin, 2015) stimuli to promote cell growth at certain direction. Otherwise it can massively reorganize and initiate symmetric or asymmetric divisions depending on how the PPB will be arranged. In a similar line, transitions between successive mitotic stages, reveal that the mitotic spindle also undergoes dramatic form shifts, while in the end, the timely and positionally accurate cell plate deposition will depend on phragmoplast microtubule dynamics.
Extensive research over the years, revealed that such transitions are facilitated and coordinated by a number of microtubule associated proteins (Hamada, 2014) including KATANIN 1 (Nakamura, 2015 and references therein).
By contrast to mammalian cells which harbor three AAA-ATPase microtubule severing enzymes, namely, katanin (McNally and Vale, 1993), spastin (Roll-Mecak and Vale, 2005), and fidgetin (Zhang et al., 2007) plants as represented by Arabidopsis thaliana and rice only seem to express KATANIN (Nakamura, 2015). The product of KATANIN 1 gene of Arabidopsis encodes for the catalytic p60 subunit of katanin, while the regulatory 80 kDa subunit seems to be absent, although four orthologues have been reported (Keech et al., 2010) but without any functional evidence. Even so, in vitro experiments showed that the p60 subunit of Arabidopsis is capable of exerting microtubule severing activity (Stoppin-Mellet et al., 2002).
By mostly studying mechanisms of microtubule reorganization in elongating hypocotyl epidermal plant cells, it was found that the severing activity of katanin favors the biased parallel arrangement of cortical microtubules by distinct mechanisms (Nakamura, 2015). First of all, KATANIN 1 severs nascent microtubules that are nucleated on the walls of preexisting ones by means of γ-tubulin and augmin mediated nucleation (Murata et al., 2005; Nakamura et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2014). KATANIN 1 severing activity is also activated at points of microtubule crossovers (Wightman and Turner, 2007) as it is often observed during environmentally inducible changes in microtubule organization (Lindeboom et al., 2013).
The roles of KATANIN 1 in the transition from interphase to mitosis with the formation of the PPB and subsequently in the dynamics of the mitotic spindle and the centrifugal expansion of the cytokinetic phragmoplast remain largely elusive as only three previous studies addressed mitotic microtubule organization exclusively in fixed root cells of three KATANIN 1 mutants fra2, lue1, and ktn1-2 using immunolocalization technique (Burk et al., 2001; Panteris et al., 2011; Panteris and Adamakis, 2012).
Herein we chose to study microtubule dynamic organization in a knockout KATANIN 1 mutant ktn1-2 (Nakamura et al., 2010). To circumvent disadvantages of static imaging in fixed cells, we study microtubule organization and dynamics in interphase and dividing cells of ktn1-2 stably expressing an appropriate microtubule marker GFP-TUA6. Using both high-resolution and fast advanced microscopy platforms such as structured illumination microscopy (SIM), spinning disc, and Airyscan confocal laser scanning microscopy, we uncover novel functions of KATANIN 1 on microtubule dynamics during cell cycle.
Materials and Methods
A. thaliana wild type Columbia (Col-0) ecotype and ktn1-2, a T-DNA mutant were used. For germination, Col-0 and mutant seeds were surface sterilized, plated on 0.8% w/v Phytagel® solidified 1/2 Murashige and Skoog medium (1/2 MS; Duchefa) with 1% w/v sucrose, stratified for 1–4 days at 4°C and subsequently transferred to environmental chamber with controlled light/dark cycle, temperature, and humidity.
Unless stated otherwise, all common chemicals were from Sigma and were of analytical grade. FM4-64 was from Invitrogen and it was used at a final concentration of 5μg/ml diluted in half-strength liquid MS medium.
Transgenic Line Preparation and Selection
For live cell imaging Col-0 and ktn1-2 mutants stably expressing a GFP-TUA6 marker were used. For generating transgenic ktn1-2 line with GFP-TUA6, ktn1-2 homozygotes (Nakamura et al., 2010) were crossed with Col-0 plants stably transformed with a 35S::TUA6:GFP construct (Shaw et al., 2003). For imaging purposes, 7–10 day old seedlings grown from F2 seeds were used after selection for obvious ktn1-2 phenotype and expression of GFP.
For live imaging of microtubules in the ktn1-2 mutant we used four different Zeiss microscopy platforms (Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany) including an LSM710 spectral CLSM, a Cell Observer, spinning disc, an LSM880 with Airyscan and an Elyra PS.1 unit for SIM (Komis et al., 2014, 2015). For documentation of cortical microtubule dynamics we used either SIM coupled to a PCO. Edge 5.5 sCMOS camera (Komis et al., 2015) using the 488 nm line of an Argon laser for excitation and appropriate filter cube for emission, or the LSM710 with 4-line averaging and pinhole set to 1 Airy unit for GFP coupled to a 32 GaAsP detector. For documenting mitotic spindle dynamics we rather used a Cell Observer spinning disc system with a 25 mW multiline Argon laser (which was set to 50% of laser power of the 488 nm line for every experiment), coupled to an Evolve 512 EM CCD camera, setting laser power and camera exposure time (typically 100 ms) to the minimum possible to allow acquisition of 3D time series. Alternatively, we have used also LSM880 with Airyscan and single photon excitation with the 488 nm line of a multiline argon laser with the same specifications as mentioned before (25 mW for the 488 nm line) and a 32 GaAsP detector. Due to the superior light collecting capacity of the Airyscan and the sensitivity of the GaAsP detector, laser power never exceeded 1% of the laser. In this case samples were either scanned with the Fast mode to allow sufficient temporal resolution during 3D-time acquisition, or with the super-resolution mode to allow optimum 3D resolution for acquiring single Z-stacks. To avoid phototoxicity perturbations and temporal delays during the documentation of the mitotic progress, we preferably used the Airyscan CLSM and the spinning disc microscope for recording mitotic cells, since they allowed the most efficient light collection compared to other platforms and also a fast scanning mode of the sample. The ability of cells to progress through mitosis and complete cytokinesis without disturbances was considered as proof of lack of phototoxicity for the duration of each respective experiment.
Images acquired with the above microscope systems were post-acquisition analyzed. Angular distribution of cortical and PPB microtubules was deciphered by means of Cytospectre (Kartasalo et al., 2015). Using this software, it is possible to decipher the angular distribution of cortical microtubules irrespectively of their polarity (since GFP-TUA6 labels the microtubule lengthwise) and thus deduce their net orientation as “transverse” (i.e., perpendicular to the cell axis) at angles of 90° or 270°, “longitudinal” (i.e., parallel to the cell axis) at angles of 0° or 180° and random at angles 0°<φ <180°. The software also provides an estimate of the ratios of polymers per angle (0–1 at 0.2 increments; concentric cycles in the respective graphs).
For quantifying fluorescence skewness (a measure of microtubule bundling) we used previously published macros (Higaki et al., 2010) which were developed for Image J (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) on SIM images of Col-0 or ktn1-2 petiole or cotyledon epidermal cells carrying a GFP-TUA6 molecular marker for microtubules. These macros belong to the formerly known KBI suite from Hasezawa lab and can be now found in LPixel ImageJ Plugins (https://lpixel.net/products/lpixel-imagej-plugins/).
For microtubule dynamic analyses, kymographs were generated using the appropriate Kymograph plugin of Zeiss Zen Blue 2014 (Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany), or the MultipleKymograph plugin for Image J (https://www.embl.de/eamnet/html/kymograph.html). From such kymographs, variables such as end-wise growth and shrinkage rates, catastrophe, and rescue frequencies were calculated. In particular, growth and shrinkage rate were calculated from the growth and shrinkage slope of the respective kymograph. Catastrophe or rescue frequencies were calculated by dividing the total number of events recorded (catastrophes and rescues, respectively) by the total time spent in the growing (for catastrophes) or shrinking (for rescues) phase during which these events were counted (Verde et al., 1992) for each microtubule recorded. Severing events in Col-0 and ktn1-2 mutants were measured from SIM videos and were expressed as events × 10−3/μm2/min.
Wherever applicable wild type and ktn1-2 microtubule dynamics parameters were compared by two-tailed Student's t-test. Statistical significance was deemed when p < 0.05.
Organization and Dynamics of Cortical Microtubules
Petiole epidermal cells of Col-0 are elongated and as such they favor the predominant transverse orientation of cortical microtubules (Figures 1a,b). KATANIN 1 depletion in the ktn1-2 mutant, promoted the isotropic growth of petiole epidermal cells and prevented the transverse orientation of cortical microtubules which rather occupied the cell cortex at random orientations (Figures 1c,d). Further inspection of cotyledon epidermal cells, showed that by comparison to Col-0 where microtubules where randomly oriented (Figure 1e), ktn1-2 mutants exhibited similar patterns of organization. The only difference in this case was the observation of multiple branched nucleation events (Figure 1f, inset) compared to Col-0 where branching was more sparse (Figure 1e, inset).
Figure 1. Cortical microtubule organization in petiole and cotyledon epidermal cells of Col-0 and ktn1-2 mutant expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker after SIM 2D imaging. (a,b) Prevalent transverse orientation of cortical microtubules in Col-0 petiole epidermal cells (a) shown by very narrow angular distribution (b). (c,d) Mixed orientation of cortical microtubules in ktn1-2 petiole epidermal cells (c) and its quantitative demonstration (d). (e,f) Cortical microtubule organization in the cotyledon of Col-0 (e) showing a single branching event (inset; arrow) and ktn1-2 (f) showing multiple de novo branched initiation and formation of microtubules (f; arrows; inset). Scale bars: 10μm.
KATANIN 1 depletion also affected the degree of microtubule bundling in petiole and cotyledon epidermal cells. The above measure was quantified in terms of skewness (Figure 2). In the first case, it was found that bundling of cortical microtubules was significantly reduced in both petiole and cotyledon epidermal cells of ktn1-2 (Figures 2c–f) as compared to Col-0 (Figures 2a,b,e,f).
Figure 2. Microtubule skewness in Col-0 and ktn1-2 petiole and cotyledon epidermal cells expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker after SIM 2D imaging. (a–d) Examples of microtubule organization in petiole (a,c) and cotyledon (b,d) epidermal cells of Col-0 (a,b) and ktn1-2 (c,d). (e) Skewness of petiole epidermal cells of Col-0 and ktn1-2 (***p < 0.001; N = 49 cells for Col-0 and N = 34 for ktn1-2). (f) Skewness of cotyledon epidermal cells of Col-0 and ktn1-2 (*p < 0.05; N = 28 cells for Col-0 and N = 26 for ktn1-2). Scale bars: 10 μm.
Documentation of microtubule plus and minus end dynamics showed that by comparison to Col-0 (7.41 ± 1.42 μm/min; N = 40 microtubules from 12 cells; Figures 3a,b,e; Table 1), cortical microtubules of ktn1-2 mutant show significantly slower plus end growth kinetics (5.6 ± 1.59 μm/min; N = 36 microtubules from 14 cells; p < 0.001; Figures 3c–e; Table 1). Other measures of microtubule dynamics, including plus end shrinkage (18.7 ± 3.14 μm/min for Col-0; N = 39 microtubules from 12 cells vs. 17.47 ± 3.19 μm/min for ktn1-2; N = 40 microtubules from 14 cells; Figure 3f; Table 1), minus end growth (1.12 ± 0.4 μm/min for Col-0; N = 18 microtubules from 12 cells vs. 1.12 ± 0.47 μm/min for ktn1-2; N = 14 microtubules from 8 cells; Figure 3g; Table 1), and minus end shrinkage (1.39 ± 0.42 μm/min for Col-0; N = 26 microtubules from 20 cells vs. 1.37 ± 0.4 μm/min for ktn1-2; N = 25 microtubules from 22 cells; Figure 3h; Table 1) revealed no significant differences. It was also noteworthy that ktn1-2 mutants showed significantly lower catastrophe and rescue frequencies (0.017 ± 0.003 and 0.011 ± 0.004 events/s, respectively from a total of 40 microtubules compared to Col-0, 0.022 ± 0.006 and 0.016 ± 0.008 events/s, respectively from a total of 39 microtubules; Figures 3i,j; Table 1).
Figure 3. Time lapsed 2D imaging of cotyledon epidermal cell cortical microtubules by CLSM and quantitative analysis of end-wise dynamics in Col-0 and ktn1-2 mutant, stably expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker. (a,b) A single microtubule from Col-0 exhibiting dynamic instability from the plus end (a, arrowhead) and the respective kymograph (b) with annotations of plus (+) and minus (−) ends. (c,d) An individual microtubule (c, arrowhead) from ktn1-2 showing dynamic instability and the respective kymograph (d) with annotations of plus (+) and minus (−) ends. (e–h) Quantification of average values (± S.D) of plus end growth (e, n = 40 and 36 for Col-0 and ktn1-2, respectively; ***p < 0.001), shrinkage (f, n = 39 and 40 for Col-0 and ktn1-2, respectively), and minus end growth (g, n = 18 and 14 for Col-0 and ktn1-2, respectively) and shrinkage (h, n = 26 and 25 for Col-0 and ktn1-2, respectively). (i,j) Catastrophe (i, ***p < 0.001) and rescue (j, *p < 0.05) frequencies (mean ± S.D) comparing Col-0 and ktn1-2 (n = 39 microtubules for Col-0 and n = 40 microtubules for ktn1-2). These and other microtubule dynamics parameters can be found in Table 1. Scale bars: 10 μm (a–c) 5 μm (d); Time bars: 1 min (b), 2 min (d). Numbers in (a,c) correspond to time (min:s).
As expected, ktn1-2 mutants exhibit completely abolished severing activity resulting in the absence of severing in expected sites of the cortical array such as microtubule crossovers (Figures 4a–c; Table 1). In particular, the severing frequency in Col-0 petiole epidermal cells was 0.145 ± 0.0918 events × 10−3 × μm−2 (N = 19 cells) while in ktn1-2 petiole epidermal cells the respective frequency was 0 (N = 16 cells). The absence of severing in ktn1-2 mutants was most striking at predominant severing sites such as microtubule crossovers (e.g., Figure 4b).
Figure 4. Recording of severing events in Col-0 and ktn1-2 petiole epidermal cells expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker with time-lapsed 2D SIM. The spotted appearance of microtubules owes to the inhomogeneous incorporation of TUA6-GFP in the microtubule lattice (a,b; see Section Discussion by Komis et al., 2014). Time lapsed stills of petiole epidermal cell region showing severing in Col-0 (a) and absence of severing in ktn1-2 (b). (c) Quantitative comparison of severing frequencies in petiole epidermal cells of Col-0 and ktn1-2 (***p < 0.001; N = 19 cells from Col-0 and N = 16 cells from ktn1-2). Severing frequencies can be found in Table 1. Arrows in (a) show microtubule crossover in first 2 frames and the microtubule ends resulting from severing in the rest of the frames. In (b) arrows in first frame show 3 microtubule crossovers where no severing is observed. Scale bars: 2 μm. Numbers at (a,b) correspond to time (s.ms).
Defects in PPB Formation and Delayed PPB Maturation
Major defects in microtubule organization of ktn1-2 mutant were observed in the case of PPB formation and narrowing as studied comparatively in Col-0 and ktn1-2 seedlings stably transformed with a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker. Col-0 cells exhibit a well-organized PPB comprising of parallel and straight microtubules (Figure 5a) with perpendicular orientation (Figure 5b). By contrast, ktn1-2 preprophase cells mostly show very broad and often splayed PPBs with asymmetric organization containing over elongated and frequently bent microtubules localized outside of the PPB region (Figures 5c1,c2,d; Video S1) as well as fan-shaped, broad, disordered, and an incomplete PPBs (Figures 5e–g). It is also worth to note that many such PPBs of the ktn1-2 mutant were incomplete as deemed by 3D rendering, failing to circumvent the entire cell cortex.
Figure 5. PPB organization and MT anisotropy in Col-0 and ktn1-2 mutants expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker. Single optical sections were acquired with Airyscan CLSM (a,c,e,f) and SIM (g). (a) Typical early PPB (brackets) of Col-0 dividing petiole epidermal cell showing roughly parallel and homogeneous distribution of microtubules. (b) Angular distribution of microtubules in PPB of (a) showing a rather uniform transverse orientation. (c1,c2) Early PPB of ktn1-2 petiole epidermal cell at surface (c1) and mid (c2) planes, showing a well-focused side and a much broader microtubule distribution on opposite side (c1,c2 brackets) with long microtubules emanating from the PPB to the rest of the cortex. Scanning time was 4.28 min for the entire Z-stack while a rotating panoramic view can be found in Video S1. (d) Angular distribution of microtubules in PPB of (c1) showing much broader orientation than in (a) although with a transverse orientation trend. (e–g) More examples of abnormal PPB organization in ktn1-2 including a fan-shaped PPB at surface (e1) and at middle (e2; asterisk denotes position of nucleus optical planes), a broad, disordered (f) and an incomplete one (g). Asterisk in (c2) and (e2) indicates position of nucleus. Scanning time was 3.74 min for (e1,e2) and 17.8 s for (f); (g) is a single optical section Scale bars: 5 μm.
In the 3 dimensions, the PPB of Col-0 (Figures 6a–d3; Video S2) encompasses the entire cortical circumference with a rather uniform microtubule band. By contrast, PPBs of ktn1-2 are non-uniform in width while sometimes they are incomplete failing to form a complete ring (Figures 6e–g3; Video S3). In quantitative terms, all PPBs examined in Col-0 (over 50 PPBs) were normal, while PPBs of ktn1-2 were variably abnormal. In this case we discriminated 3 distinct categories: those with asymmetry of their organization extent (one side well organized and the other poorly organized; category I with 21 cases in total; Figures 5c1,c2,e1,e2), those which exhibited a roughly uniform width, however, with residual long cortical microtubules outside the PPB area (category II with 12 cases in total; Figure 5f) and those which were incomplete (category III with 8 cases in total; Figures 5g, 6g1–g3).
Figure 6. Completeness of Col-0 and ktn1-2 PPB in the three dimensions as visualized in cotyledon epidermal cells expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker after Z-optical sectioning and 3D reconstruction (a,b,e,f) or after single optical section imaging (c,d,g) using spinning disc microscopy. (a,b) Overview (a) and higher magnification (b) of Col-0 cotyledon epidermis showing two adjacent cells with well-organized and complete PPBs at two different rotation angles. These cells are shown in a rotating panoramic view at Video S2. (c,d) Top (c1,d1), middle (c2,d2), and bottom (c3,d3) views of the PPBs shown in (b). (e,f) Overview (e) and detail (f) of aberrant PPB formation in ktn1-2 mutant at two different rotation angles. The same cell is shown in a rotating panoramic view at Video S3. (g) Top (g1), middle (g2), and bottom (g3) views of the ktn1-2 PPB shown in (f). Red arrows in (a,e) denote PPBs. Asterisks in (c2,d2,g2) denote nuclear position. Arrowheads in (c,d,g) denote the PPBs. For all Z-acquisitions shown herein, total scanning time was between 45 s (a–d3) to 75 s (e–g3). Scale bars: 5 μm.
Time lapsed imaging and measurement of the PPB narrowing process showed that by contrast to PPB of Col-0 which narrows discernibly in a relatively short time (up to 1 h; Figures 7a,c,d; Video S4), the PPB of ktn1-2 cells narrows at a much slower pace (sometimes exceeding 3 h) resulting in a broader PPB compared to Col-0 (Figures 7b–d; Video S5). Owing to the very low laser power used during documentation (0.07 mW at the focal plane of a 63 × 1.40 NA oil immersion objective) and the fact that such cells successfully enter and complete mitosis and cytokinesis (Videos S4, S6), phototoxicity can be excluded as the cause for the prolonged persistence of the PPB in ktn1-2. The time lapsed series, showed that sometimes, the different forms of PPB described above (Figure 5) maybe interchangeable to a certain extent. In this respect the cell shown in Figure 7b, Videos S5, S6, starts from category II (panels 0–90 min) and transforms to a reminiscent of category I (panels 100–210 min) although not as exaggerated as shown in Figures 5e1,e2.
Figure 7. Documentation and quantitation of PPB narrowing in dividing cells of Col-0 and ktn1-2 mutant expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker after spinning disc time-lapse 2D imaging. (a) Selected stills from the Video S4, showing the progressive narrowing of the PPB (arrowheads) in a Col-0 epidermal cell until entry in mitosis. (b) Selected stills from the Videos S5, S6 (continuation of mitotic progress of this cell is shown in Figure 9b), showing the progressive narrowing of the PPB (brackets) in a ktn1-2 epidermal cell until entry in mitosis. (c) Line graph following the course of PPB narrowing by comparison between a Col-0 and a ktn1-2 cell, showing significant delay in the latter. Interruptions in the lines correspond to interruptions in the recordings. (d) Averaged kinetic documentation of PPB narrowing (N = 6–7 cells from a total of 5 plants) showing significant delay of PPB narrowing in the ktn1-2 mutant (***p < 0.001). Scale bars: 10 μm. Numbers in (a,b) correspond to time (min).
Progress of Mitosis and Cytokinesis
Mitotic spindle assembles normally in ktn1-2 mutants as compared to Col-0 and assumes bipolarity quite early during prophase (Figures 8a,b). In all cases examined we never observed aberrations in mitotic spindle polarity as previously published (Panteris et al., 2011), however, we corroborated the residence of cortical microtubules reminiscent of PPB in late mitotic cells (Figures 8b1–b3; Video S7; see also Panteris et al., 2011). Likewise, the overall architecture of phragmoplast is conserved between Col-0 (Figure 8c) and ktn1-2 mutants (Figures 8d–g), showing frequently the previously described “arrowhead” configuration, especially at late stages of phragmoplast expansion (Figures 8e–g).
Figure 8. Mitotic and cytokinetic forms in Col-0 and ktn1-2 mutant expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker after Airyscan CLSM (a,b) and SIM (c–g) imaging of single optical sections (b1,b2,c–g) or after 3D reconstruction (a,b3). (a) Typical prophase spindle in Col-0. (b) A typical bipolar metaphase spindle of ktn1-2 which is formed in the presence of a broad PPB (brackets, b1,b2) at the cell cortex and a 3D rendered image of the same cell (b3) which corresponds to a panoramic 3D rotation of Video S7. Scanning time of the entire Z-stack (93 sections) was 5.9 min. (c) Typical phragmoplast of Col-0 (arrowheads). (d) An oblique phragmoplast of ktn1-2 (arrowheads). (e) An advanced phragmoplast (arrowheads) of ktn1-2 progressing asymmetrically toward the parent wall. (f) A similarly asymmetric phragmoplast of ktn1-2 showing “arrowhead” configuration (arrowheads). (g) A shorter, advanced ktn1-2 phragmoplast again with “arrowhead” configuration (arrowheads). All scale bars: 10 μm.
Following the kinetics of the mitotic and cytokinetic processes and compared to Col-0 (Figures 9a,d; Video S8) mitotic progression is also slightly but significantly delayed in ktn1-2 (Figures 9b,d; Video S6). In contrast to Col-0 (Figures 9a,e; Video S8) the course of centrifugal phragmoplast expansion is more appreciably delayed in ktn1-2 (Figures 9b,c,e; Videos S6, S9). Although, the expanding phragmoplast of ktn1-2 has to frequently span longer wall-to-wall distances compared to Col-0 (Figure 9f), it does so at considerably lower rates (Figure 9g). It is notable however, that albeit the prolongation of phragmoplast expansion, we never observed abortive cytokinesis and the phragmoplast always expanded until it met the parent wall (see next section).
Figure 9. Mitotic and cytokinetic progression in Col-0 and ktn1-2 petiole epidermal cells expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker, after spinning disc 3D time-lapsed imaging. (a) Transition from PPB to spindle and finally to phragmoplast formation and expansion in two dividing Col-0 petiole epidermal cells. Corresponds to Video S8. (b) Microtubule reorganization from PPB to spindle and to phragmoplast in a dividing ktn1-2 petiole epidermal cell showing significant delay in phragmoplast expansion. Corresponds to Video S6 (showing continuation of mitotic progress in cell shown in Figure 7b). (c) Delayed phragmoplast expansion and bending in ktn1-2. Corresponds to Video S9. (d–g) Quantitative evaluation of mitotic progression comparing Col-0 and ktn1-2, showing duration of mitosis with significant delay of ktn1-2 (d; **p < 0.01; N = 20 for Col-0 and N = 45 for ktn1-2), cytokinesis (e; ***p < 0.001; N = 20 for Col-0 and N = 45 for ktn1-2), distance covered during expansion of phragmoplast (f; **p < 0.01; N = 20 for Col-0 and N = 45 for ktn1-2) and rate of phragmoplast expansion (g; **p < 0.01; N = 20 for Col-0 and N = 45 for ktn1-2). Scale Bars: (a–c) 10 μm, (h–j) 5 μm. Numbers in (a,b) correspond to time (min). Time required for an entire Z-stack was 8.6 s for (a), 7.1 s for (b), and 8.3 s for (c).
Positional Relationships between PPB, Mitotic Spindle, and Expanding Phragmoplast
In Col-0 cells, mitotic spindle assembles in such way that its equatorial plane coincides with the plane set by the PPB. Previous studies have shown that at least in the case of the root, KATANIN 1 deficiency in either erh3 or in fra2 and lue1 mutants (Webb et al., 2002; Panteris et al., 2011) results in disturbances of cell division plane orientation.
In dividing cells of Col-0, cell division plane is predetermined by the PPB. During mitosis the equatorial plane of the mitotic spindle coincides with the PPB plane and finally, it is followed by the expanding phragmoplast (Figure 10a). In dividing ktn1-2 cells, the mitotic spindle assembles at a regular bipolar form (Figure 10b). However, it exhibits random rotational motions so that the equatorial plane deviates significantly from the PPB plane. After mitosis is completed and the phragmoplast is formed, it undergoes similar motions until one end meets the parent wall at the PPB site (Figure 10b, red outlined frames). As soon as one of the phragmoplast ends is stabilized in this manner the rest cytokinetic process is rectified so that the phragmoplast plane is expanding at the plane set by the PPB (Figure 10b, panels 80 and 96 min).
Figure 10. Mitotic and cytokinetic progression in Col-0 and ktn1-2 cotyledon epidermal cells expressing a GFP-TUA6 microtubule marker after Airyscan CLSM imaging. (a) Mitotic spindle and phragmoplast dynamics in Col-0. Mitotic spindle is positioned so that the equatorial plane (yellow line) coincides with the PPB plane (red arrowheads) while the spindle axis (red line) is perpendicular to it. Both the spindle equator and the cell plate (yellow lines) remain coaligned to the CDP. Sometimes the phragmoplast reaches the parent wall asymmetrically creating a stable contact (green arrowhead) while the remaining leading edge (magenta arrowhead) still follows the trajectory predetermined by the PPB. (b) In ktn1-2 the mitotic spindle equator (yellow line) is not adhering to the predetermined CDP (red arrowheads) and the spindle rotates significantly (spindle axis indicated by red line). Subsequently the nascent phragmoplast rotates as well until one end is attracted and tethered to the parent wall (green arrowhead). After this positional correction, the phragmoplast leading edge (magenta arrowhead) strictly follows the plane determined by the PPB so that the cell plate will coincide with the predetermined CDP. It is notable that progressively microtubules at the phragmoplast margin assume the “arrowhead” configuration as shown before (frames 80 and 96 min; Panteris et al., 2011). Scale Bars: 5 μm. Numbers in (a,b) correspond to time (min:s).
Microtubule Organization and Dynamics in the ktn1-2 Mutant
Katanin is a master regulator of cortical microtubule organization (Nakamura, 2015) having essential roles in biasing their parallel arrangement during cell elongation. Previous studies showed that KATANIN 1 severs nascent microtubules formed by branched formation on preexisting microtubule walls (Nakamura et al., 2010) and becomes selectively activated at microtubule crossovers (Wightman and Turner, 2007; Wightman et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013). During the reorganization of cortical microtubules in response of blue light induction it was shown that a mechanism responsible for the selective activation of KATANIN 1 at microtubule intersections is via the activation of the PHOT1 and PHOT2 phototropin photoreceptors (Lindeboom et al., 2013). Additionally, KATANIN 1 was shown to regulate the mechanical response of cortical microtubule reorganization and establishment of anisotropy during the growth of the shoot apical meristem (Uyttewaal et al., 2012) by antagonizing the action of auxin (Sassi et al., 2014). Moreover, KATANIN 1 activity is regulating cytomorphogenesis of epidermal pavement cells, downstream of the small GTPase ROP6 (Lin et al., 2013).
In the present study, we quantified organizational defects of cortical microtubules in ktn1-2 mutants when compared to Col-0. As parameters we used angular distribution which reflects to the ordering capacity of the cortical array, skewness which is a measure of microtubule bundling. Such correlative study was quite important since the severing activity of KATANIN 1 in the above cells is strikingly different, especially regarding severing at microtubule crossroads. In this case it seems, that such events are much more frequent in petiole than in cotyledon epidermal cells (Wightman et al., 2013).
As schematically shown in Figure 11, the failure to sever microtubules at various situations depicted, can explain misorganization of cortical microtubules, since KATANIN 1 plays a key role to symmetry breaking and to anisotropy induction in the cortical array during polar or directed cell growth by biasing the parallel organization of cortical microtubules (Wightman and Turner, 2007, 2008; Nakamura et al., 2010; Uyttewaal et al., 2012; Lindeboom et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2014; Sassi et al., 2014).
Figure 11. A simplified schematic model explaining the defects of KATANIN 1 depletion in cell growth, PPB formation, and mitotic spindle positioning according to published and present data. KATANIN 1 severs microtubules after branched formation (Nakamura et al., 2010), at microtubule crossovers (Wightman and Turner, 2007) apart from severing free microtubules. Through its activity, KATANIN 1 promotes the biased organization of microtubules at different stages of plant cell cycle. In interphase cells, KATANIN 1 microtubule severing induces parallel arrangement of cortical microtubules and supports unidirectional cell growth while in its absence as it occurs in ktn1-2 mutant, cortical microtubule arrays remain disordered and result in isotropic cell growth. During PPB formation, KATANIN 1 severing activity promotes microtubule organization and confinement to the PPB zone while it is implicated in PPB narrowing. PPB formation and its course of maturation are impaired in ktn1-2. Finally, during mitosis, KATANIN 1 activity is related to mitotic spindle positioning by securing co-alignment of the equatorial plane with the CDP without affecting spindle formation, while in its absence the spindle exhibits considerable motions and appears to freely rotate in the cytoplasm. This model differs from that of Panteris et al. (2011) in that it appoints spindle rotation in KATANIN 1 mutants such as ktn1-2 to a continuous dynamic process rather than attributing it to structural deficits caused during spindle formation (spindle multipolarity).
Within studies addressing the role of KATANIN 1 in cortical microtubules its impact on the dynamics of these microtubules was not addressed. In the present study we found that most measures of microtubule dynamics in ktn1-2 cells were comparable to those of Col-0 with the exception of the plus-end growth rate (which was considerably reduced). Meanwhile the shrinkage rate was only slightly affected, but importantly the overall catastrophe frequency was also considerably reduced. As was shown by previous study on KATANIN 1 overexpression, it seems that KATANIN 1-mediated microtubule severing somehow favors microtubule bundling (Stoppin-Mellet et al., 2006). Therefore, the considerable reduction of microtubule bundling as judged by reduction in fluorescence skewness in ktn1-2 petiole and cotyledon epidermal cells was expected. Microtubule bundling is considered as a major mechanism of ordered cortical microtubule organization mediated by members of the MAP65 protein family (Lucas et al., 2011; Lucas and Shaw, 2012). For this reason we propose that the effect of KATANIN 1 in cell growth directionality is not only direct by promoting the disassembly of microtubules at unfavorable orientations but also indirect by regulating microtubule bundling. These two discrete functions may explain cortical microtubule disordering and isotropic cell growth in the ktn1-2 mutant. When katanin severs a microtubule, it promotes the exposure of GDP-tubulin ends which will inevitably undergo catastrophic shrinkage (Mace and Wang, 2015).
Involvement of KATANIN in PPB Formation and Maturation and Cell Division Plane Determination
The present study is the first one to provide mechanistic insight on the involvement of KATANIN 1 in mitotic and cytokinetic progression of Arabidopsis cells through time lapsed imaging. The PPB is formed at the S to G2 interphase of the cell cycle by the large scale rearrangement of cortical microtubules to a broad annular microtubule assembly that progressively narrows until it finally disappears at the onset of mitosis concomitantly with nuclear envelope breakdown (Vos et al., 2004; Marcus et al., 2005; Azimzadeh et al., 2008). The duration of PPB persistence from its formation until its disappearance may be prolonged (e.g., over 11/2–2 h as recorded in tobacco BY-2 cells; Dhonukshe and Gadella, 2003; Vos et al., 2004) while in cases it may considerably exceed the duration of the entire mitotic procedure (as estimated for Azolla pinnata; Gunning et al., 1978). In our case, delays in PPB maturation/narrowing were inferred by comparison of the same cell types (i.e., dividing cotyledon pavement cells and dividing petiole epidermal cells). Of its known roles, the PPB accurately predicts the insertion of the succeeding cell plate during cytokinesis (Pickett-Heaps and Northcote, 1966; Rasmussen et al., 2011 and references therein) and represents a cortical site of intense endocytotic uptake (Karahara et al., 2009). Very interesting recent study proposed that PPB regulates robustness of cell division orientation by limiting spindle rotations (Schaefer et al., 2017). In this respect, we have found spatio-temporaly disturbed PPBs along with vigorous spindle and phragmoplast rotations in the ktn1-2 mutant. They suggest KATANIN 1 role in the positioning of PPB, spindle, and phragmoplast.
Early steps of microtubule bundling during the onset of PPB formation are mediated by short actin microfilaments (Takeuchi et al., 2016) while the occurence of actin within the PPB is considered to be crucial for its narrowing which is prevented upon actin depolymerization (Granger and Cyr, 2001). The inability of ktn1-2 preprophase cells to form a regular and progressively narrowing PPB, implicates KATANIN 1 microtubule severing activity in controlling microtubule assembly during both processes. Therefore, it is not surprising that ectopic microtubules, i.e., microtubules that reach cortical areas outside the PPB zone, seem to emanate from the PPB.
The role of PPB in the determination of cell division plane orientation has been extensively documented through the localization of cortical marker proteins such as TANGLED, FASS, PHRAGMOPLAST ORIENTING KINESINS 1 and 2, AIR9, and RanGAP1, the localization of which either coincides or even persists at the cortical PPB site throughout mitosis and cytokinesis (Camilleri et al., 2002; Buschmann et al., 2006; Müller et al., 2006; Walker et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2008). Beyond the localization of the above protein markers at the PPB site and the defects of cell division plane orientation observed in Arabidopsis mutants of the above proteins, the mechanisms attracting the phragmoplast at the cortical cell division plane and guiding cell plate deposition coincidentally to the PPB plane remain largely elusive.
In accordance to previous localization of KATANIN 1 within the PPB (Panteris et al., 2011), we postulate that KATANIN 1 is not responsible for clearing the rest of the cell cortex from residual microtubules but rather that KATANIN 1 activity is restricted within the PPB to regulate microtubule length and in this way KATANIN 1 depletion in ktn1-2 perturbs PPB shape, organization and position. From our kinetic analysis, it became also evident that PPB narrowing is considerably prolonged, further suggesting that KATANIN 1 activity is also implicated in PPB maturation.
In such wide PPB areas defined in ktn1-2 mutants, it is hypothetically possible that markers of CDP orientation attracting cell plate deposition to the PPB site (Lipka et al., 2015) may be more diffusely localized and this would help to explain the occurence of oblique cell division planes observed in KATANIN 1 mutants such as erh3, fra2, lue1, and ktn1-2 (e.g., Webb et al., 2002; Panteris et al., 2011). In living mitotic petiole and cotyledon epidermal cells of ktn1-2 we never observed multipolar spindles as those described before by tubulin immunofluorescence in fixed root whole mounts of fra2 and lue1 (Panteris et al., 2011). Mitotic spindles of ktn1-2 were uniformly bipolar and identical in shape compared to those of Col-0. What differed remarkably between the two samples (Col-0 and ktn1-2) was that mitotic spindles of ktn1-2 exhibited large scale rotational motions with the equatorial plane deviating considerably from the CDP as it is defined by the PPB. After the completion of mitosis, the young phragmoplast is also very motile showing a propensity to co-align with the PPB site. Once one part of the phragmoplast is stably anchored to the parent wall, it does so on the PPB site while the remaining of phragmoplast margin moves along the PPB plane until it meets the opposite PPB cortical site. By contrast to what was published before (Panteris et al., 2011) spindle polarity, form, or position, is not related to CDP orientation since cell plate deposition uniformly follows the PPB plane in ktn1-2 irrespectively of spindle orientation. Therefore, whenever CDP orientation defects are observed in KATANIN 1 mutants (Webb et al., 2002; Panteris and Adamakis, 2012) they can be attributed to PPB malorganization or misorientation.
In ktn1-2 mutant most of the PPBs documented show an asymmetry with respect to their organization degree with one very well focused and one poorly and very broad side. In this case, it might be that the expanding phragmoplast might establish firm contact with the cortical site corresponding to the well-organized PPB side, however, it would have problems to navigate toward the ill-defined side.
Involvement of KATANIN 1 in Progression of Mitosis and Cytokinesis
In dividing epidermal cells of the petiole or the cotyledon of ktn1-2 mutant, the spindle forms normally prior to PPB breakdown. As a matter of fact, the mitotic spindle may progress to metaphase in the presence of prominent residual PPB-like cortical microtubule structure, suggesting that the complete disassembly of the PPB is not a prerequisite for normal mitotic spindle assembly.
The mitotic spindle of the ktn1-2 mutant at any stage of its organization (prophase, metaphase, and anaphase) does not seem to differ morphologically from its Col-0 counterpart, further implying that KATANIN 1 microtubule severing is not required to guide spindle assembly and transitions. To this extend we never observed the previously reported spindle multipolarity during prophase as reported before (Panteris et al., 2011; Panteris and Adamakis, 2012). Moreover, and in contradiction to animal cells, A. thaliana KATANIN 1, does not seem to affect mitotic spindle size as was shown through comparison between two different Xenopous species (Loughlin et al., 2011).
In contrast to Col-0 where the spindle showed minimal movement in the cytoplasmic space, ktn1-2 mitotic spindles at any stage displayed broad rotational motions such that the equatorial plane significantly deviated from the PPB plane. This observation suggests that KATANIN 1 activity is somehow required for spindle positional control, possibly by controlling attachment of the spindle to the cell cortex (Granger and Cyr, 2001; Kojo et al., 2013, 2014; Lipka et al., 2015). Similar motions were also exhibited by the nascent phragmoplast at the earliest stages of its formation and before its margin could become tethered to the parent wall. Nevertheless, the motions of the phragmoplast can be considered as corrective as they always concluded with the attachment of its margin to predetermined cortical sites. Therefore, anchoring of the phragmoplast to the “correct” cortical sites (i.e., those determined by the PPB) is not prevented in the ktn1-2 mutant.
KATANIN 1 depletion also interferes with the course of mitosis but most remarkably with the duration of cytokinesis, although it does not prevent the complete cell plate deposition, neither does it uncouple its positional relationship with the PPB. The centrifugal expansion of the phragmoplast requires a continuous assembly of microtubules at its margin followed by microtubule disassembly at the lagging parts toward the center of the cell plate (Murata et al., 2013). Similar delays in phragmoplast expansion were observed in the Arabidopsis signaling mutant mpk4, lacking the activity of the mitogen activated protein kinase 4 (Beck et al., 2011). Such results indicate that the coordinated microtubule unbundling via MPK4-dependent phosphorylation of members of the MAP65 microtubule bundling proteins (Beck et al., 2010; Sasabe et al., 2011) and KATANIN 1-mediated microtubule severing, may facilitate the clearing of microtubules from the lagging areas of the phragmoplast and allow its centrifugal expansion solely at the margin.
GK and MO conducted all live cell imaging. GK and IL made all post acquisition analyses with input from MO, DS, and IL generated material pertinent to this study. OŠ helped with quantitative evaluations. GK wrote first draft of the manuscript with input from all co-authors. JŠ conceived and supervised study, helped to interpret data and finalized manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We cordially acknowledge Masayoshi Nakamura and Sidney Shaw for sharing published materials and Pavlína Floková for her help. This work was funded by Czech Science Foundation GAČR, project Nr. 15-19284 and by student project IGA_PrF_2017_026 from PU Olomouc.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00866/full#supplementary-material
Video S1. Panoramic 3D rendering of the cell shown in Figure 5c.
Video S2. Panoramic 3D rendering of the cell shown in Figure 6b.
Video S3. Panoramic 3D rendering of the cell shown in Figure 6f.
Video S4. Time lapsed series of the cell shown in Figure 7a.
Video S5. Time lapsed series of the cell shown in Figure 7b.
Video S7. Panoramic 3D rendering of the cell shown in Figure 8b.
Video S8. Time lapsed series of the cell shown in Figure 9a.
Video S9. Time lapsed series of the cell shown in Figure 9c.
Azimzadeh, J., Nacry, P., Christodoulidou, A., Drevensek, S., Camilleri, C., Amiour, N., et al. (2008). Arabidopsis TONNEAU1 proteins are essential for preprophase band formation and interact with centrin. Plant Cell 20, 2146–2159. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.056812
Beck, M., Komis, G., Müller, J., Menzel, D., and Samaj, J. (2010). Arabidopsis homologs of nucleus- and phragmoplast-localized kinase 2 and 3 and mitogen-activated protein kinase 4 are essential for microtubule organization. Plant Cell 22, 755–771. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.071746
Beck, M., Komis, G., Ziemann, A., Menzel, D., and Samaj, J. (2011). Mitogen-activated protein kinase 4 is involved in the regulation of mitotic and cytokinetic microtubule transitions in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 189, 1069–1083. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03565.x
Burk, D. H., Liu, B., Zhong, R., Morrison, W. H., and Ye, Z. H. (2001). A Katanin-like protein regulates normal cell wall biosynthesis and cell elongation. Plant Cell 13, 807–828. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.4.807
Buschmann, H., Chan, J., Sanchez-Pulido, L., Andrade-Navarro, M. A., Doonan, J. H., and Lloyd, C. W. (2006). Microtubule-associated AIR9 recognizes the cortical division site at preprophase and cell-plate insertion. Curr. Biol. 16, 1938–1943. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.028
Camilleri, C., Azimzadeh, J., Pastuglia, M., Bellini, C., Grandjean, O., and Bouchez, D. (2002). The Arabidopsis TONNEAU2 gene encodes a putative novel protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit essential for the control of the cortical cytoskeleton. Plant Cell 14, 833–845. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010402
Chen, X., Grandont, L., Li, H., Hauschild, R., Paque, S., Abuzeineh, A., et al. (2014). Inhibition of cell expansion by rapid ABP1-mediated auxin effect on microtubules. Nature 516, 90–93. doi: 10.1038/nature13889
Dhonukshe, P., and Gadella, T. W. Jr. (2003). Alteration of microtubule dynamic instability during preprophase band formation revealed by yellow fluorescent protein-CLIP170 microtubule plus-end labeling. Plant Cell 15, 597–611. doi: 10.1105/tpc.008961
Dovgalyuk, A., Kalynyak, T., and Blume, Y. B. (2003). Heavy metals have a different action from aluminium in disrupting microtubules in Allium cepa meristematic cells. Cell Biol. Int. 27, 193–195. doi: 10.1016/S1065-6995(02)00334-7
Gunning, B. E., Hardham, A. R., and Hughes, J. E. (1978). Pre-prophase bands of microtubules in all categories of formative and proliferative cell division in Azolla roots. Planta 143, 145–160. doi: 10.1007/BF00387786
Higaki, T., Kutsuna, N., Sano, T., Kondo, N., and Hasezawa, S. (2010). Quantification and cluster analysis of actin cytoskeletal structures in plant cells: role of actin bundling in stomatal movement during diurnal cycles in Arabidopsis guard cells. Plant J. 61, 156–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04032.x
Janski, N., Masoud, K., Batzenschlager, M., Herzog, E., Evrard, J. L., Houlne, G., et al. (2012). The GCP3-interacting proteins GIP1 and GIP2 are required for γ–tubulin complex protein localization, spindle integrity, and chromosomal stability. Plant Cell 24, 1171–1187. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.094904
Karahara, I., Suda, J., Tahara, H., Yokota, E., Shimmen, T., Misaki, K., et al. (2009). The preprophase band is a localized center of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in late prophase cells of the onion cotyledon epidermis. Plant J. 57, 819–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03725.x
Kartasalo, K., Pölönen, R. P., Ojala, M., Rasku, J., Lekkala, J., Aalto-Setälä, K., et al. (2015). CytoSpectre: a tool for spectral analysis of oriented structures on cellular and subcellular levels. BMC Bioinformatics 16:344. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0782-y
Keech, O., Pesquet, E., Gutierrez, L., Ahad, A., Bellini, C., Smith, S. M., et al. (2010). Leaf senescence is accompanied by an early disruption of the microtubule network in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 154, 1710–1720. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.163402
Kojo, K. H., Higaki, T., Kutsuna, N., Yoshida, Y., Yasuhara, H., and Hasezawa, S. (2013). Roles of cortical actin microfilament patterning in division plane orientation in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 1491–1503. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct093
Kojo, K. H., Yasuhara, H., and Hasezawa, S. (2014). Time-sequential observation of spindle and phragmoplast orientation in BY-2 cells with altered cortical actin microfilament patterning. Plant Signal. Behav. 9:e29579. doi: 10.4161/psb.29579
Komis, G., Mistrik, M., Samajová, O., Doskočilová, A., Ovečka, M., Illés, P., et al. (2014). Dynamics and organization of cortical microtubules as revealed by superresolution structured illumination microscopy. Plant Physiol. 165, 129–148. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.238477
Komis, G., Mistrik, M., Šamajová, O., Ovečka, M., Bartek, J., and Šamaj, J. (2015). Superresolution live imaging of plant cells using structured illumination microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1248–1263. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.083
Krasylenko, Y. A., Yemets, A. I., Sheremet, Y. A., and Blume, Y. B. (2012). Nitric oxide as a critical factor for perception of UV-B irradiation by microtubules in Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 145, 505–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01530.x
Lei, L., Singh, A., Bashline, L., Li, S., Yingling, Y. G., and Gu, Y. (2015). CELLULOSE SYNTHASE INTERACTIVE1 is required for fast recycling of cellulose synthase complexes to the plasma membrane in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27, 2926–2940. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00442
Lin, D., Cao, L., Zhou, Z., Zhu, L., Ehrhardt, D., Yang, Z., et al. (2013). Rho GTPase signaling activates microtubule severing to promote microtubule ordering in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 23, 290–297. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.022
Lindeboom, J. J., Nakamura, M., Hibbel, A., Shundyak, K., Gutierrez, R., Ketelaar, T., et al. (2013). A mechanism for reorientation of cortical microtubule arrays driven by microtubule severing. Science 342:e1245533. doi: 10.1126/science.1245533
Liu, T., Tian, J., Wang, G., Yu, Y., Wang, C., Ma, Y., et al. (2014). Augmin triggers microtubule-dependent microtubule nucleation in interphase plant cells. Curr. Biol. 24, 2708–2713. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.053
Loughlin, R., Wilbur, J. D., McNally, F. J., Nédélec, F. J., and Heald, R. (2011). Katanin contributes to interspecies spindle length scaling in Xenopus. Cell 147, 1397–1407. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.014
Lucas, J. R., Courtney, S., Hassfurder, M., Dhingra, S., Bryant, A., and Shaw, S. L. (2011). Microtubule-associated proteins MAP65-1 and MAP65-2 positively regulate axial cell growth in etiolated Arabidopsis hypocotyls. Plant Cell 23, 1889–1903. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.084970
Mace, A., and Wang, W. (2015). Modelling the role of catastrophe, crossover and katanin-mediated severing in the self-organisation of plant cortical microtubules. IET Syst. Biol. 9, 277–284. doi: 10.1049/iet-syb.2015.0022
Marcus, A. I., Dixit, R., and Cyr, R. J. (2005). Narrowing of the preprophase microtubule band is not required for cell division plane determination in cultured plant cells. Protoplasma 226, 169–174. doi: 10.1007/s00709-005-0119-1
Murata, T., Sano, T., Sasabe, M., Nonaka, S., Higashiyama, T., Hasezawa, S., et al. (2013). Mechanism of microtubule array expansion in the cytokinetic phragmoplast. Nat. Commun. 4:1967. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2967
Murata, T., Sonobe, S., Baskin, T. I., Hyodo, S., Hasezawa, S., Nagata, T., et al. (2005). Microtubule-dependent microtubule nucleation based on recruitment of gamma-tubulin in higher plants. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 961–968. doi: 10.1038/ncb1306
Nakamura, M. (2015). Microtubule nucleating and severing enzymes for modifying microtubule array organization and cell morphogenesis in response to environmental cues. New Phytol. 205, 1022–1027. doi: 10.1111/nph.12932
Nakamura, M., Ehrhardt, D. W., and Hashimoto, T. (2010). Microtubule and katanin-dependent dynamics of microtubule nucleation complexes in the acentrosomal Arabidopsis cortical array. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 1064–1070. doi: 10.1038/ncb2110
Nyporko, A. Y., Demchuk, O. N., and Blume, Y. B. (2003). Cold adaptation of plant microtubules: structural interpretation of primary sequence changes in a highly conserved region of alpha-tubulin. Cell Biol. Int. 27, 241–243. doi: 10.1016/S1065-6995(02)00342-6
Panteris, E., Adamakis, I. D., Voulgari, G., and Papadopoulou, G. (2011). A role for katanin in plant cell division: microtubule organization in dividing root cells of fra2 and lue1 Arabidopsis thaliana mutants. Cytoskeleton 68, 401–413. doi: 10.1002/cm.20522
Paredez, A. R., Somerville, C. R., and Ehrhardt, D. W. (2006). Visualization of cellulose synthase demonstrates functional association with microtubules. Science 312, 1491–1495. doi: 10.1126/science.1126551
Rasmussen, C. G., Humphries, J. A., and Smith, L. G. (2011). Determination of symmetric and asymmetric division planes in plant cells. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62, 387–409. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103802
Roll-Mecak, A., and Vale, R. D. (2005). The Drosophila homologue of the hereditary spastic paraplegia protein, spastin, severs and disassembles microtubules. Curr. Biol. 15, 650–655. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.029
Sasabe, M., Kosetsu, K., Hidaka, M., Murase, A., and Machida, Y. (2011). Arabidopsis thaliana MAP65-1 and MAP65-2 function redundantly with MAP65-3/PLEIADE in cytokinesis downstream of MPK4. Plant Signal. Behav. 6, 743–747. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.5.15146
Sassi, M., Ali, O., Boudon, F., Cloarec, G., Abad, U., Cellier, C., et al. (2014). An auxin-mediated shift toward growth isotropy promotes organ formation at the shoot meristem in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 24, 2335–2342. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.036
Schaefer, E., Belcram, K., Uyttewaal, M., Duroc, Y., Goussot, M., Legland, D., et al. (2017). The preprophase band of microtubules controls the robustness of division orientation in plants. Science 356, 186–189. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3016
Soga, K., Yamaguchi, A., Kotake, T., Wakabayashi, K., and Hoson, T. (2010). 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid ACC-induced reorientation of cortical microtubules is accompanied by a transient increase in the transcript levels of gamma-tubulin complex and katanin genes in azuki bean epicotyls. J. Plant Physiol. 167, 1165–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.04.001
Takeuchi, M., Karahara, I., Kajimura, N., Takaoka, A., Murata, K., Misaki, K., et al. (2016). Single microfilaments mediate the early steps of microtubule bundling during preprophase band formation in onion cotyledon epidermal cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 1809–1820. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-12-0820
Uyttewaal, M., Burian, A., Alim, K., Landrein, B., Borowska-Wykręt, D., Dedieu, A., et al. (2012). Mechanical stress acts via katanin to amplify differences in growth rate between adjacent cells in Arabidopsis. Cell 149, 439–451. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.048
Verde, F., Dogterom, M., Stelzer, E., Karsenti, E., and Leibler, S. (1992). Control of microtubule dynamics and length by cyclin A- and cyclin B-dependent kinases in Xenopus egg extracts. J. Cell Biol. 118, 1097–1108. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.5.1097
Vos, J. W., Dogterom, M., and Emons, A. M. (2004). Microtubules become more dynamic but not shorter during preprophase band formation: a possible “search-and-capture” mechanism for microtubule translocation. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 57, 246–258. doi: 10.1002/cm.10169
Walker, K. L., Müller, S., Moss, D., Ehrhardt, D. W., and Smith, L. G. (2007). Arabidopsis TANGLED identifies the division plane throughout mitosis and cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 17, 1827–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.063
Webb, M., Jouannic, S., Foreman, J., Linstead, P., and Dolan, L. (2002). Cell specification in the Arabidopsis root epidermis requires the activity of ECTOPIC ROOT HAIR 3-a katanin-p60 protein. Development 129, 123–131.
Wightman, R., Chomicki, G., Kumar, M., Carr, P., and Turner, S. R. (2013). SPIRAL2 determines plant microtubule organization by modulating microtubule severing. Curr. Biol. 23, 1902–1907. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.061
Xu, X. M., Zhao, Q., Rodrigo-Peiris, T., Brkljacic, J., He, C. S., Müller, S., et al. (2008). RanGAP1 is a continuous marker of the Arabidopsis cell division plane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 18637–18642. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806157105
Zhang, D., Rogers, G. C., Buster, D. W., and Sharp, D. J. (2007). Three microtubule severing enzymes contribute to the “Pacman-flux” machinery that moves chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 177, 231–242. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200612011
Keywords: Arabidopsis, cell division, interphase, katanin, live imaging, microtubules, preprophase band, super resolution microscopy
Citation: Komis G, Luptovčiak I, Ovečka M, Samakovli D, Šamajová O and Šamaj J (2017) Katanin Effects on Dynamics of Cortical Microtubules and Mitotic Arrays in Arabidopsis thaliana Revealed by Advanced Live-Cell Imaging. Front. Plant Sci. 8:866. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00866
Received: 07 February 2017; Accepted: 09 May 2017;
Published: 24 May 2017.
Edited by:Elison B. Blancaflor, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, United States
Reviewed by:Takashi Murata, National Institute for Basic Biology, Japan
Etsuo Yokota, University of Hyogo, Japan
Copyright © 2017 Komis, Luptovčiak, Ovečka, Samakovli, Šamajová and Šamaj. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jozef Šamaj, firstname.lastname@example.org
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.