Potassium Starvation Limits Soybean Growth More than the Photosynthetic Processes across CO2 Levels

Elevated carbon dioxide (eCO₂) often enhances plant photosynthesis, growth, and productivity. However, under nutrient-limited conditions the beneficial effects of high CO₂ are often diminished. To evaluate the combined effects of potassium (K) deficiency and eCO₂ on soybean photosynthesis, growth, biomass partitioning, and yields, plants were grown under controlled environment conditions with an adequate (control, 5.0 mM) and two deficient (0.50 and 0.02 mM) levels of K under ambient CO₂ (aCO₂; 400 μmol mol⁻¹) and eCO₂ (800 μmol mol⁻¹). Results showed that K deficiency limited soybean growth traits more than photosynthetic processes. An ~54% reduction in leaf K concentration under 0.5 mM K vs. the control caused about 45% less leaf area, biomass, and yield without decreasing photosynthetic rate (P_net). In fact, the steady photochemical quenching, efficiency, and quantum yield of photosystem II, chlorophyll concentration (TChl), and stomatal conductance under 0.5 mM K supported the stable P_net. Biomass decline was primarily attributed to the reduced plant size and leaf area, and decreased pod numbers and seed yield in K-deficient plants. Under severe K deficiency (0.02 mM K), photosynthetic processes declined concomitantly with growth and productivity. Increased specific leaf weight, biomass partitioning to the leaves, decreased photochemical quenching and TChl, and smaller plant size to reduce the nutrient demands appeared to be the means by which plants adjusted to the severe K starvation. Increased K utilization efficiency indicated the ability of K-deficient plants to better utilize the tissue-available K for biomass accumulation, except under severe K starvation. The enhancement of soybean growth by eCO₂ was dependent on the levels of K, leading to a K × CO₂ interaction for traits such as leaf area, biomass, and yield. A lack of eCO₂-mediated growth and photosynthesis stimulation under severe K deficiency underscored the importance of optimum K fertilization for maximum crop productivity under eCO₂. Thus, eCO₂ compensated, at least partially, for the reduced soybean growth and seed yield under 0.5 mM K supply, but severe K deficiency completely suppressed the eCO₂-enhanced seed yield.

Introduction

Potassium (K) is the second most abundant element, after nitrogen (N), taken-up by plant roots. A large area of cropland is K deficient, partly due to the removal of native K by plants over years of cropping and an inadequate K application as compared with N and phosphorus (P) (Smil, 1999; Römheld and Kirkby, 2010). K deficiency limits crop growth and yield by adversely affecting vital plants processes, such as water relations and cellular turgidity, cell expansion, assimilate transport, and enzyme activation (Marschner, 1986; Pettigrew, 2008; Römheld and Kirkby, 2010). The atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentration is expected to double from the current level of 400 μmol mol⁻¹ by the year 2100 (IPCC, 2013). An increase in CO₂ concentration increases plant photosynthesis, growth, and yield, especially in C₃ crops such as soybean. However, plant response to elevated CO₂ (eCO₂) depends on other environmental factors. For instance, soil-related constraints such as insufficient supply of mineral nutrients may limit the growth enhancement effects of eCO₂ (Hoosbeek et al., 2002; Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Lenka and Lal, 2012). Moreover, an increased crop demand for mineral nutrients due to the use of high yielding cultivars and greater plant growth under eCO₂ might exacerbate the limitations, especially under nutrient deficient conditions (Conroy, 1992; Rogers et al., 1993; Singh et al., 2015). K deficiency and eCO₂ are expected to co-occur under natural conditions and their interaction may alter the degree of plant growth and physiological responses. Thus, the interaction study would help to elucidate whether the eCO₂ compensates the adverse effects of K deficiency and the extent of changes in the response of plant growth and physiological attributes.

Crops including soybean are highly sensitive to K deficiency, with a strong impact on biomass accumulation, yield, and quality (Sale and Campbell, 1986; Pettigrew, 2008; Gerardeaux et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2013). K starvation decreases leaf K concentration and may suppress vital plant physiological processes without a substantial reduction in the rate of photosynthesis and before visible leaf symptoms occur (Bednarz and Oosterhuis, 1999; Gerardeaux et al., 2009; Kanai et al., 2011). Previous studies in cotton suggested a considerable decrease in leaf area and dry matter production without a marked reduction in leaf- or ground-based canopy photosynthesis under moderate K deficiency (Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Gerardeaux et al., 2009). Therefore, unlike N or P, K deficiency appears to limit plant growth and root development by suppressing the processes of supply and transport of sugars, metabolites, and other minerals among plant organs more than direct inhibition of carbon assimilation (Marschner, 1986; Cakmak et al., 1994; Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Gerardeaux et al., 2009; Römheld and Kirkby, 2010; Kanai et al., 2011; Singh and Reddy, 2016). However, several functional and structural limitations to the photosynthetic potential may occur under severe K deficiency. Prominent functional limitations include restricted diffusion of CO₂ into and through leaves (stomatal or mesophyll conductance), diminished carboxylation capacity, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and assimilate transport. Structural limitations are attributed to the alterations in leaf morphology, size and density of stomata, and anatomical features such as leaf thickness and density, orientation of the chloroplasts, and the intercellular air space (Zhao et al., 2001; Gerardeaux et al., 2009; Jin et al., 2011; Battie-Laclau et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2016a).

Nutrient deficiency also affects biomass partitioning and nutrient allocation among plant parts (Gill et al., 1997; Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Singh et al., 2014). Since translocation mechanisms involving phloem loading and transport are interrupted by low tissue K concentration, this may lead to the impairment of partitioning and utilization of carbon reserves (Cakmak et al., 1994; Bednarz and Oosterhuis, 1999; Cakmak, 2005). A minimum concentration of tissue K is therefore essential to support metabolic processes, and uptake and transport mechanisms, and to maintain cellular turgidity (Siddiqi and Glass, 1981; Cakmak, 2005; Römheld and Kirkby, 2010). Gill et al. (1997) found increased K utilization efficiency (KUE) under moderate K stress in wheat genotypes. However, under nutrient-limited conditions, greater nutrient use efficiency has not always been observed (Singh and Reddy, 2014).

Although, CO₂ enrichment stimulates plant photosynthesis and growth, K starvation may limit this stimulation (Hoosbeek et al., 2002; Reddy and Zhao, 2005). Nonetheless, a positive effect of elevated CO₂ on plant growth is still expected under K deficiency due to an increased carbohydrate supply, which may aid the energy demands of the stressed plants (Ahmed et al., 1993; Singh et al., 2013b). Moreover, the growth and seed filling processes of soybean depend on the remobilization of resources such as carbohydrates, minerals, and amino acids among plant organs, and plant photosynthetic capacity. All of these processes are influenced by K nutrition and elevated CO₂, which in combination may alter growth and physiological processes (Conroy, 1992; Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Singh and Reddy, 2016). Therefore, the interaction between K deficiency and eCO₂ can modify the overall crop response to K deficiency in soybean. Studies evaluating the whole-plant response to the combination of K deficiency and elevated CO₂ in soybean are extremely limited. We hypothesized that growth and photosynthetic responses to K starvation would differ in soybean depending on the level of K supplied, and that eCO₂ would compensate, at least partially, for the adverse effect of K starvation on plant growth. The objectives of this study were to investigate the interactive effects of K and CO₂ levels on soybean photosynthesis, growth, biomass partitioning, and nutrient allocation and utilization efficiencies.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Conditions

The experiment was conducted at the USDA-ARS facility in Beltsville, MD, USA, using six controlled environment growth chambers (EGC Corp., Chagrin Falls, OH, USA) with three chambers per CO₂ level in 2013. The experiment was repeated over time using the same six chambers. Soybean (cv. Spencer) seeds were planted in 18 pots (volume 7.6 L, five seeds per pot) filled with quartz silica sand (#2Q-ROK^®, US Silica Company, MD, USA) in each chamber. After emergence (4 days after planting, DAP), the treatments were initiated using a combination of two levels of CO₂, 400 μmol mol⁻¹ (ambient; aCO₂) and 800 μmol mol⁻¹ (elevated; eCO₂), and three levels of K (potassium nitrate; KNO₃), 5.00 mM (control), 0.50 mM, and 0.02 mM K (K deficiency), in a modified Hoagland's nutrient solution (Hewitt, 1952). The N concentration of the nutrient solution was adjusted using ammonium nitrate (NH₄NO₃). The nutrient solution was applied using an automated and computer-controlled drip system until pots started to flush from the bottom holes, 4–6 times during the day. Pots were flushed weekly with deionized water. Pots were thinned to one plant per pot 5 days after emergence. Pots were repositioned periodically within each chamber to minimize the effects of within-chamber heterogeneity. The CO₂ treatments were re-randomized when the experiment was repeated to minimize potential chamber effects.

A 28/22°C day/night (12h/12h) air temperature was maintained to within ± 0.15°C in the growth chambers during the experiment. Light, as photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of 900 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ at plant canopy height, was supplied following emergence during the day using a combination of metal halide and high-pressure sodium lamps. The PAR at the plant canopy was monitored using a LI-COR Quantum Sensor connected to a LI-1000 data logger (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) at multiple locations within each chamber on alternate days and adjusted to the mean value of 900 ± 15 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ using controllable ballasts (Osram Sylvania, MA, USA). The daytime temperature and light were initiated at 6:00 h. Injection of either CO₂ or CO₂-free air was determined using a TC-2 controller that monitored CO₂ every 3 s, measured from an absolute infrared gas analyzer (WMA-4PP-systems, Haverhill, MA, USA). The relative humidity was not controlled and varied between 50 and 70% among chambers.

Growth Measurements

Six pots per treatment (total 36 pots: 6 pots × 3 K levels × 2 CO₂) were removed at each of 28 (full bloom), 42 (pod development), and 112 (maturity) DAP for three destructive plant harvests. Since the experiment was repeated, 72 pots (36 × 2) were destructively harvested at each of the three stages. Plant height and mainstem node numbers were recorded from each pot. Plants were separated into leaves, roots, stems, and pods. Since some of the leaves were dried at maturity, total leaf area (TLA) was measured only for the harvests conducted at 28 and 42 DAP, and to measure the specific leaf weight [SLW; mg dry weight (cm² leaf area)⁻¹]. Roots were washed in clean water. All plant parts were dried to constant weight at 70°C to determine the dry matter (DM). The seed and shell mass was determined from pods obtained at maturity after drying at 35°C in forced-ventilation air for 10 days.

Measurements of Photosynthetic Parameters

Photosynthetic parameters were measured several times between 24 and 72 DAP on the uppermost fully expanded leaves from the stem apex in 3–4 plants per treatment between 9:00 and 14:00 h using a LI-6400XT portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR Inc.) with an integrated fluorescence chamber head (LI-COR 6400-40 Leaf Chamber Fluorometer). These measurements were made at a PAR of 1500 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹; the leaf temperature of the instrument was set to 28°C; the CO₂ concentration was set to match the CO₂ treatments; and the relative humidity inside the LI-COR leaf chamber varied between 45 and 60%. Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were made simultaneously when a steady state (around 4–6 min) was obtained. The net photosynthesis rate (P_net), stomatal conductance (g_s), transpiration (T), sub-stomatal (C_i) CO₂ concentration, and photochemical yield of CO₂ fixation (Φ_CO2) were computed from the instrument's software. For the chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, the steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence (F_s) was measured first followed by maximal fluorescence (${\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }$) by providing a 0.8 s flash of saturating light of >8,000 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ PAR. Immediately following, the minimal fluorescence of the light-adapted leaf (${\text{F}}_o^{\prime }$) was obtained by providing a dark flash by turning off the actinic light briefly while using far-red LEDs (centered wavelength 740 nm). The far-red radiation drives Photosystem I (PSI) to help drain Photosystem II (PSII) electrons. The variable fluorescence yield in the light-adapted leaves (${\text{F}}_v^{\prime }$), efficiency of energy harvesting by oxidized (open) PSII reaction centers in light (${\text{F}}_v^{\prime }$/${\text{F}}_m^{\prime }$), proportion of the PSII unit in open state or photochemical quenching (q_P), and photochemical quantum yield of PSII electron transport rate (Φ_PSII) were determined following Genty et al. (1989) using the equations:

$\begin{array}{cc}{\text{F}}_{\text{v}}^{\prime }={\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }-{\text{F}}_{\text{o}}^{\prime }& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

$\begin{array}{cc}{\text{F}}_{\text{v}}^{\prime }/{\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }=({\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }-{\text{F}}_{\text{o}}^{\prime })/{\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

$\begin{array}{cc}{\text{q}}_{\text{P}}=({\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }-{\text{F}}_{\text{s}})/({\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }-{\text{F}}_{\text{o}}^{\prime })& \left(3\right)\end{array}$

$\begin{array}{cc}{\Phi }_{\text{PSII}}=({\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }-{\text{F}}_{\text{s}})/{\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }& \left(4\right)\end{array}$

Details of the fluorescence measurements and other operational details are available in the instrument's manual (LI-6400 Instruction Manual, version 5, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska, USA).

Tissue Chlorophyll, Potassium, and Nitrogen Measurements

The total chlorophyll concentration (TChl), and leaf K and N concentrations were determined from the uppermost fully expanded leaves that were used for gas exchange measurements. The leaves were detached immediately after the gas exchange measurements and fresh and dry weights were determined after drying to a constant weight at 70°C. The K and N concentrations were also determined in each plant organ (i.e., leaf, stem, root, pod, shell, and seed) at all harvests. The weighted whole-plant (referred to as plant) K and N concentrations were estimated as the sum of the products of the dry mass of plant organs and their nutrient concentration divided by the total biomass (Singh et al., 2015). Similarly, the weighted pod K and N concentrations at the final harvest were estimated as the sum of the products of the dry mass of seeds and shells and their nutrient concentrations divided by pod dry weight. The K and N utilization efficiencies for biomass production (KUE and NUE, respectively) were estimated by dividing total biomass by the whole-plant K or N concentration (Singh et al., 2015). The total K or N absorbed (mg plant⁻¹) per unit of root biomass was used as an indicator of K or N uptake efficiency (KUpE and NUpE, respectively).

Chlorophyll was extracted by placing two 0.95 cm² leaf disks for each leaf in a vial containing 7 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide and incubating in the dark for 24 h. Thereafter, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 664 and 648 nm by using a UV-2101-PC spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corp., Columbia MD, USA). The total chlorophyll was estimated by using the equation of Lichtenthaler (1987) and expressed on a leaf area basis (μg cm⁻²). The dry matter of plant parts was ground using a Wiley Mill (Wiley^® Mill, Thomas Scientific, NJ, USA) to pass through a 1 mm screen. The K concentration was determined in the ground dried-tissue in the Agriculture Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Arkansas, AR, USA, using a standard procedure (Plank, 1992). In brief, 0.25 g tissue was digested at 110–120°C for ~2 h using concentrated HNO₃ and hydrogen peroxide on an Al digestion block in calibrated 50 ml tubes. The samples were then brought to a 25 mL total volume with deionized water. The digestates were analyzed by using a Spectro ARCOS EOP-Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrophotometer (Spectro Analytical Instruments, Mahwah, NJ, USA). The N concentration of the plant tissues was determined by combustion using a CHN-2000 (Carbon Hydrogen Nitrogen-2000, LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (SAS Enterprise Guide, 4.2, SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). To test for the effect of treatments and their interaction, the SAS procedure PROC MIXED with Kenward-Rogers (kr) adjustment of degrees of freedom was used for analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the individual measurements from each repetition of the experiment. Treatments (K and CO₂) and their interaction were considered as fixed effects and repetition of the experiment as a random effect. Treatment comparisons were conducted by using the least square means (LSMEANS) procedure (at α = 0.05) when the main effect and/or the interaction was significant at P ≤ 0.05, and the letter grouping was obtained using the pdmix800 macro (Saxton, 1998). Since the plant age (DAP) was likely to have a significant impact on variables measured throughout the season (Figures 1, 2), the DAP and its interactions with the treatments were included as fixed effects in the analysis. However, the treatment comparison was conducted only on the seasonal means (averaged across DAP) for each variable. PROC REG, PROC GLM, or PROC NLIN procedures of SAS was used for linear, polynomial, or non-linear regression analyses to calculate the coefficients and to establish the relationships between the plant attributes.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Seasonal variation (A) and mean values (B) of potassium (K) and nitrogen (N) concentrations and N/K ratio in uppermost fully expanded soybean leaves as affected by K treatments under ambient (aCO₂; filled symbols/black bars, 400 μmol mol⁻¹) and elevated CO₂ (eCO₂; open symbols/gray bars, 800 μmol mol⁻¹). Symbols (A) represent the mean ± SE of 6–8 individuals measured across the repeated experiment between 24 and 72 days after planting (DAP). Bars (B) represent seasonal means + SE, and the analysis of variance for the effects of K, CO₂ (C), DAP (D), and their interactions is also shown with the significance levels, where *, **, ***, and ^ns represent P ≤ 0.05, P ≤ 0.01, P ≤ 0.001, and P > 0.05, respectively. Bars with different letters are significantly different at α = 0.05. Error bars smaller than the symbols are not visible.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Seasonal variation (A,C) and mean values (B,D) of photosynthesis (P_net), efficiency of energy harvesting by oxidized (open) photosystem II (PSII) reaction centers in light (${\text{F}}_{\text{v}}^{\prime }$/${\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }$), photochemical quantum yield of PSII electron transport rate (Φ_PSII), proportion of the PSII unit in open state or photochemical quenching (q_P), ratio between Φ_PSII and quantum yield of CO₂ fixation (Φ_PSII/Φ_CO2), sub-stomatal CO₂ concentration (C_i), stomatal conductance (g_s), transpiration (T), and total chlorophyll concentration (TChl) of the uppermost fully expanded soybean leaves as affected by K supply under ambient (aCO₂; filled symbols/black bars, 400 μmol mol⁻¹) and elevated CO₂ (eCO₂; open symbols/gray bars, 800 μmol mol⁻¹). See Figure 1 for other information.

Results

There were no visual K deficiency symptoms observed on the soybean leaves of control plants. The leaves of plants grown under 0.5 mM K treatment showed some marginal chlorosis on the tips and edges of a few leaves in the top half of the plant canopy at around 58 DAP, especially at eCO₂. Under severe K (0.02 mM K) deficiency, stems were slender, and the lower leaves began to show chlorosis around the tips and edges by 20 DAP. At the advanced stage, these symptoms extended inward toward the midrib and interveinal chlorosis/necrosis and some degree of inward curling of leaves was observed as plants aged under both CO₂ treatments. All leaves of plants grown under severe K deficiency showed various stages of K deficiency symptoms during the later growth stages. Similar K deficiency symptoms have been reported in the leaves of soybean and cotton plants (Bell et al., 1987; Bednarz et al., 1998).

K and N Concentrations in the Uppermost Fully Expanded Leaves Decreased or Increased, Respectively, under K Starvation, but Tended to Decline at eCO₂

The K and N concentrations in the uppermost fully expanded leaves tended to decline with plant age (DAP), especially under the control treatment (Figure 1A). However, the N concentration under severe K deficiency (0.02 mM K) increased at ~50 DAP. Compared with the control, the seasonal mean (averaged across the DAP) K concentration significantly declined by 54–79%, but the mean N concentration increased by 7–45% under K starvation (Figure 1B). The seasonal means of leaf K and N concentrations were 7.35–20.03% lower under eCO₂ vs. aCO₂ across K treatments. The N/K ratio was ~2- to 8-fold greater under K deficiency regardless of CO₂ level throughout the growing season, which was also reflected by the seasonal mean data (Figures 1A,B).

K and N Concentration of Plant Organs Decreased or Increased, Respectively, under K Starvation, but Responses to eCO₂ Varied

K deficiency significantly decreased the tissue K concentration by over 50% in all plant organs as compared with the control (Table 1). In contrast, K deficiency caused an accumulation of N in all plant organs with the highest increase observed for shells (>250%) followed by the leaves and stems (>150%) at maturity. The accumulation of tissue N concentration was relatively greater under 0.02 vs. 0.5 mM K treatment. In the vegetative plant parts, on average, stems had the greatest K concentration but leaves had the greatest N concentration. In the reproductive parts, seeds or pods had the highest concentration of both K and N. The eCO₂ tended to decrease tissue K concentration of plants, leaves, and pods at maturity, particularly under the control and 0.5 mM K. A significant effect of CO₂ treatment on tissue N concentration was mainly observed 28 and 42 DAP in plants, leaves, and roots. The K × CO₂ interaction was also observed for K and N concentrations of plants, stems, and pods in at least one out of the three harvests and was attributed to the minimal or negative effects of CO₂ under the severe K deficiency. For instance, the K concentration in stems at 28 DAP increased by 11–26% under eCO₂ vs. aCO₂ for the two high K treatments but decreased by 34% for the lowest (0.02 mM) K treatments.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Effect of CO₂ (μmol mol⁻¹) and potassium (K; mM) treatments on K and nitrogen (N) concentration in tissues of soybean plants and organs 28, 42, and 112 (or maturity) days after planting (DAP).

Photosynthetic Parameters Primarily Declined at the Lowest K Supply but Varied under eCO₂ across K Levels

The photosynthetic parameters appeared to be consistent in the growing season except at the beginning or end of the measurement period, which might have led to the significant effect of plant age (DAP) on these traits (Figure 2). Averaged across growth CO₂, the seasonal mean of P_net, ${\text{F}}_{\text{v}}^{\prime }$/${\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }$, Φ_PSII, q_P, C_i, g_s, T, and TChl significantly declined by ≈70, 6, 38, 33, 12, 77, 66, and 75%, respectively, particularly at the lowest (0.02 mM K) vs. control K treatment (Figures 2B,D). However, the Φ_PSII/Φ_CO2 ratio increased by 94% under the same condition. The eCO₂ significantly increased seasonal mean P_net (15–28%) under the two high K treatments but not under the lowest K treatment leading to a K × CO₂ interaction. The eCO₂ stimulated ${\text{F}}_{\text{v}}^{\prime }/{\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }$ while it tended to decrease Φ_PSII, q_P, and Φ_PSII/Φ_CO2 (Figure 2B). The mean g_s and T consistently declined (20–51%) at eCO₂ vs. aCO₂ across K treatments (Figure 2D). The mean TChl also decreased by 10–20% under eCO₂, particularly in the two high K treatments.

Growth Parameters Consistently Declined under K Starvation and Were Enhanced by eCO₂ at Higher K Levels

K starvation significantly decreased all growth parameters, except the mainstem node numbers, across the three harvests (Table 2). In contrast, eCO₂ significantly stimulated TLA, DM production, pods, and seed yield at the two high K treatments (control and 0.5 mM K). However, this stimulation was either not observed or not significant at the lowest K (0.02 mM) treatment, leading to a K × CO₂ interaction. Averaged across the CO₂ levels, as compared with the control, the K deficiency caused ~45 and 95% decline under 0.5 and 0.02 mM K, respectively, for TLA, DM, and seed yield across all harvests (Tables 2, 3). The eCO₂ stimulated TLA and DM by ≈50% and seed yield by ≈35%, when averaged between the two high K treatments. Moreover, these eCO₂-mediated enhancements for TLA and DM were ≈30% greater under the 0.5 mM K than under the control treatment, whereas for the seed yield the enhancement was 14%. Averaged between CO₂ levels and harvests, the plant C/N ratio was 10.3 under control K but decreased to 7.2 in severely K-deficient plants. Compared with the control K treatment, the pod and seed numbers were also decreased by 65–71% under K starvation but were increased under eCO₂ by 20–49%, particularly at the two high K treatments (Table 2). The individual seed weight (g seed⁻¹) also declined under severe K deficiency by ≈60% and was unaffected by growth CO₂.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Effect of CO₂ (μmol mol⁻¹) and potassium (K; mM) treatments on plant height (PH; cm), mainstem node numbers (NN; plant⁻¹), total leaf area (TLA; cm² plant⁻¹), total dry matter (DM; g plant⁻¹), plant C/N ratio, number of pods (Pod no.; plant⁻¹), seed number (Seed no.; plant⁻¹), and individual seed weight (g Seed⁻¹) of soybean at 28, 42, and 112 (or maturity) days after planting (DAP).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Effect of CO₂ (μmol mol⁻¹) and potassium (K; mM) on biomass partitioning of soybean plants at 28, 42, and 112 (maturity) days after planting (DAP).

Biomass Partitioning Was Affected by K Starvation and eCO₂

Several plant organs showed a K × CO₂ interaction attributed to the varying degree of K nutrition-dependent stimulation by eCO₂ (Table 3). The dry weight of plant organs was significantly decreased with the decreasing K supply while eCO₂ enhanced these traits, particularly under the two higher K levels (Table 3). Averaged across K treatments, the leaf, stem, root, and pod weight increased 27.6, 68.0, 23.0, and 33.4, respectively, under eCO₂ at maturity. The K treatment significantly affected biomass partitioning among plant parts at all harvests. K starvation increased the average biomass partitioning to leaves (8–97%) across harvests and to the root fraction (54%) at maturity. However, partitioning to pods and seeds was drastically reduced, particularly under the 0.02 mM K treatment. CO₂ treatment significantly affected partitioning to stems at 42 and 112 DAP. K × CO₂ interaction was observed for biomass partitioning toward leaves, pods, and seeds at maturity. eCO₂ increased the fraction of stems by 12.6–28.2% in the last two harvests when averaged across K levels. However, biomass partitioning toward pods and seed declined under eCO₂ by 30.3% and 46.9%, respectively, under the 0.02 mM K treatment.

K and N Uptake and Utilization Efficiencies Varied with K Levels. The eCO₂ Stimulated KUE and NUE

KUpE and NUpE increased more than 4-fold between 28 DAP and plant maturity when averaged across treatments (Table 4). Averaged across CO₂ levels, the K deficiency significantly decreased mean KUpE by 66.37% at 0.5 mM K and 80.4% at 0.02 mM K treatments across three harvests (Table 4). However, NUpE increased 6–72% under K deficiency when averaged across CO₂ treatments at 29 and 42 DAP and remained unaffected at the maturity. KUE and NUE increased by 33.3- and 28.4-fold, respectively, with plant age between 28 DAP and maturity when averaged across treatments. Averaged across CO₂ treatments, KUE increased by 42.8–124.2% under 0.5 mM K as compared with the control but decreased by 43.5–51.8% under 0.02 mM K treatment across harvests. However, compared with the control, NUE consistently declined by 48.2 and 93.2% at 0.5 and 0.02 mM K, respectively, when averaged across CO₂ levels and harvest dates. eCO₂ increased both KUE and NUE, especially under control (34.8–45.3%) and 0.5 mM K treatments (79–95%) across all harvests.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Effect of CO₂ (μmol mol⁻¹) and potassium (K; mM) treatments on K and N uptake efficiency [KUpE and NUpE; mg K (g root dry weight)⁻¹] and utilization efficiency [KUE and NUE; g² dry weight (mg K)⁻¹] of soybean plants at 28, 42, and 112 (or maturity) days after planting (DAP).

Tissue K Concentration Was Inversely Related to N, N/K Ratio, SLW, and Root/Shoot Ratio While P_net, DM, and Seed Yield Increased with Tissue K and Showed Greater Response to eCO₂

Plant N concentration, N/K ratio, and SLW increased curvilinearly as the leaf K concentration decreased without a significant difference between CO₂ treatments (Figure 3). Based on the regression fit, a decreased leaf K concentration from 28.5 to 3.2 mg g⁻¹ led to an increase in plant N concentration from 42.5 to 58.2 mg g⁻¹ (Figure 3A). The leaf N/K ratio increased exponentially exhibiting the greatest increase below roughly 10 mg g⁻¹ leaf K concentration (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Relationship of leaf potassium (K) concentration with (A) plant nitrogen (N) concentration, (B) N/K ratio, and (C) specific leaf weight (SLW) of soybean grown under ambient (aCO₂; filled symbols, 400 μmol mol⁻¹) and elevated CO₂ (eCO₂; open symbols, 800 μmol mol⁻¹) at three K levels. Symbols represent the mean ± SE of six individuals measured across the repeated experiment. Data are pooled from the destructive harvests at 28, 42, and 112 (A,B) or 28 and 42 (C) days after planting. Dotted lines represent either the polynomial second-order (A,C) or exponential decay (B) equation fitted across CO₂ treatments. The significance level of the regression analysis for each equation is indicated as *** representing P ≤ 0.001. Error bars smaller than the symbols are not visible.

The P_net, DM, and seed yield increased non-linearly with leaf K concentration, and the response was greater under eCO₂ (Figures 4A–C). The P_net appeared to be steady above ~8 mg g⁻¹ leaf K concentration (Figure 4A). Root/shoot ratio exhibited an inverse linear relationship with leaf K concentration (Figure 4D). The individual seed weight and seed K concentration increased curvilinearly with leaf K concentration and did not differ between CO₂ levels (Figures 4E,F). However, seed N concentration decreased with increase in leaf K concentration similarly across CO₂ levels (Figure 4G).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Relationship of leaf potassium (K) concentration with (A) photosynthesis (P_net), (B) total dry matter (DM), (C) seed yield, (D) root/shoot ratio, (E) individual seed weight (g seed⁻¹), (F) seed K concentration, and (G) seed nitrogen (N) concentration of soybean grown under ambient (aCO₂; filled symbols/solid lines, 400 μmol mol⁻¹) and elevated CO₂ (eCO₂; open symbols/dashed lines, 800 μmol mol⁻¹) at three K levels. Symbols represent the mean ± SE of at least six individuals measured across the repeated experiment six times in the season in the uppermost fully expanded leaves (A) or from the destructive harvests at maturity (B–G). Lines are the fit of either exponential rise to maximum-3 parameters (A), polynomial second-order (B,C,E,F) or linear regression (D,G) equations. Dotted lines represent the fit across CO₂ treatments. The significance level of the regression analysis for each equation is indicated as *, **, or *** representing P ≤ 0.05, P ≤ 0.01, and P ≤ 0.001, respectively. Error bars smaller than the symbols are not visible.

Discussion

Potassium Deficiency Limited Growth and Yields More Than Photosynthetic Processes

Despite the 54% decrease in K concentration in the uppermost fully expanded leaves under 0.5 mM vs. control (5 mM) K supply, the mean P_net did not decline at either CO₂ level. In fact, other critical components of photosynthesis, such as ${\text{F}}_{\text{v}}^{\prime }$/${\text{F}}_m^{\prime }$, Φ_PSII, q_P, T, g_s, C_i, and TChl, also remained unaffected, indicating that the mean leaf K concentrations of between 10.4 and 23.0 mg g⁻¹ at aCO₂ and 9.1 and 20.0 mg g⁻¹ at eCO₂ were satisfactory for optimum photosynthetic processes. Similarly, a stable P_net across a wide range of leaf K concentrations (between roughly 12 and 40 mg g⁻¹) was evident in cotton and alfalfa from the previous studies (Cooper et al., 1967; Reddy and Zhao, 2005). In contrast to the P_net, the averaged TLA, total DM, and seed yields declined by ~45% under 0.5 mM vs. control K regardless of CO₂ level. This was primarily attributed to the decreased plant height, leaf number, biomass accumulation, and number of pods per plant. However, under severe K deficiency (0.02 mM K), the P_net, g_s, and TChl exhibited about a 75% reduction as compared with the control, which was still less than the approximately 90% decreases observed for TLA, DM, and seed yield. The lower seed yield under severe K deficiency was associated with reduced pod and seed numbers and reduced seed size. Thus, severe K deficiency was required to induce a substantial decline in photosynthetic processes as compared with growth parameters, validating part of the hypothesis that “the growth and photosynthetic responses to K starvation would differ in soybean depending on the level of K supplied.” Previous studies also suggested that the rate of photosynthesis declined under severe K starvation, whereas biomass accumulation was sensitive to even mild K deficiency (Andrews and Svec, 1976; Gerardeaux et al., 2009).

Under severe K deficiency, a drastic reduction of photosynthetic processes was in agreement with other studies in soybean and cotton (Andrews and Svec, 1976; Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Gerardeaux et al., 2009; Li et al., 2011). The decline of g_s was accompanied by decreased T and C_i under severe K deficiency, which might indicate the partial contribution of stomatal limitation to overall photosynthetic capacity. However, previous studies indicated that biochemical limitations and reduced mesophyll conductance to CO₂ might have a greater impact on the P_net limitations under K deficiency (Jin et al., 2011; Battie-Laclau et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2016b; Jákli et al., 2017). The beneficial effect of eCO₂ on photosynthetic processes under control and 0.5 mM K treatment suggested that a steeper CO₂ gradient might facilitate CO₂ diffusion through stomata and mesophyll cells (Singh et al., 2013b). However, the lack of eCO₂ stimulation on photosynthesis-related traits under severe K deficiency indicated that the P_net might be primarily limited by non-stomatal factors, such as mesophyll resistance to CO₂ diffusion and the inhibition of the photo-biochemical processes. Reduced function of PSII photochemistry, mesophyll conductance, carboxylation capacity, rate of electron transport, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and assimilate transport due to decreased phloem loading have been reported under K deficiency in several species (Gerardeaux et al., 2009; Jin et al., 2011; Battie-Laclau et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2016b; Jákli et al., 2017). Moreover, the larger reduction in growth compared with the reduction in photosynthetic properties may also lead to the downregulation of photosynthetic potential due to limited sink capacity, which was also reflected by lower C/N ratios (Singh et al., 2013b). The stress-mediated photosynthetic limitations on the photo-biochemical turnover of the absorbed light energy [NADP(H), ATP] results into excess excitation of PSII, which may lead to the impairment of the PSII reaction center in the chloroplast (Marschner and Cakmak, 1989; Cakmak, 2005). In fact, reduced chlorophyll and impairment of the photochemical properties was also evident in this study by the concomitant reduction of the photochemical efficiency and quantum yield of PSII (e.g., ${\text{F}}_{\text{v}}^{\prime }$/${\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }$ and Φ_PSII) under severe K deficiency. The high Φ_PSII/Φ_CO2 ratio indicated consumption of electrons by sinks other than CO₂ fixation (pseudocyclic electron flux, N metabolism, and photorespiration), supporting the observed lower quantum yield (Φ_PSII) in severely K-deficient plants (Brooks, 1986; Edwards and Baker, 1993).

The regression relationships of the plant processes with tissue K concentration provided insight into the changes in their functional relationship across a gradient of leaf K at different CO₂ levels (Figures 3, 4). The N accumulation in plants led to the inverse relationship observed between tissue K and N concentrations similarly across CO₂ levels but resulted in reduced C/N and increased N/K ratios under K deficiency. The mean N/K ratio in the uppermost fully expanded leaves was below two under control conditions whereas it increased up to 16 in K-deficient plants, indicating K as the primary growth-limiting factor (Lawniczak et al., 2009). When growth is limited by other nutrients, the excess N might be stored in the form of nitrogenous compounds (e.g., non-functional protein, amino acids) at the expense of other cellular components such as chlorophyll and enzymes (Staswick et al., 1991; Singh et al., 2016). In the present study, the accumulation of N was exacerbated by the increase in N supply in the K- deficient treatments. The eCO₂ modified the exponential relationship between P_net and leaf K, with a greater P_net observed above roughly 8 mg g⁻¹ tissue K concentration. However, below this (8 mg g⁻¹) leaf K concentration, P_net did not differ between CO₂ levels and sharply declined. A similar reduction in photosynthesis with leaf K concentration has also been observed in other species (Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Jin et al., 2011). The DM and seed yield were also increased in response to increasing leaf K concentration, and productivity was always greater under eCO₂ for a given leaf K concentration, except under very low leaf K. Moreover, as compared with the P_net, the DM and seed yield began to decline at the higher level of leaf K concentration indicating greater sensitivity to K deficiency. For instance, the DM and seed yield declined while P_net remained unaffected roughly near leaf K concentration of 11 mg g⁻¹ (Figures 4A–C). However, regression relationships for DM and seed yield should be treated with caution because of the large gap between leaf K concentrations of plants supplied with 5.0 vs. 0.5 mM K treatments. The eCO₂ did not modify the relationship of root/shoot ratio, individual seed weight, or the concentration of seed K and N to the concentration of leaf K, which was in agreement with a previous study conducted under P nutrition in soybean (Singh et al., 2014). The inverse relationship between seed N and leaf K concentration suggested that N mobilization to the seed was not restricted and the seed N demand may be lower due to decreased seed yield under K deficiency (Singh et al., 2014).

Under Severe K Starvation, Biomass Accumulation and Partitioning Tended to Decrease or Increase, Respectively, for Vegetative Plant Organs but Declined Consistently for Reproductive Organs

Biomass partitioning and the allocation of nutrients among plant organs are important traits that may reflect the plant ability to adjust physiological and metabolic processes under a given situation. The vegetative plant organs (leaves, stems, and roots) at maturity responded to the K starvation by decreased biomass accumulation but increased partitioning, especially under severe K deficiency. Interestingly, the biomass partitioning toward the reproductive organs (pod and seed yield) was largely unaffected between the control and 0.5 mM K supply (Table 3). However, under severe K deficiency, the partitioning to pod and seed yields decreased by over 75%. Thus, under 0.5 mM K supply, the decreased yield primarily resulted from a direct decline in yield-related traits, whereas under severe K deficiency, both a decline of and the reduced partitioning toward yield-related traits contributed to the yield loss. K deficiency has been shown to restrict fruit production to a greater extent than vegetative growth in cotton (Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Read et al., 2006). The biomass partitioning toward the leaves may promote more leaf area in an effort to enhance carbon assimilation and increase the carbohydrate supply. Increased biomass partitioning toward the roots under K deficiency was only observed at maturity that led to the inverse relationship between root/shoot ratio and leaf K concentration (Figure 4D). The large decline in the fraction of reproductive structures (e.g., pod and seed yield) under severe K deficiency may have increased the root/shoot ratio. In fact, no significant relationships (linear: r² = 0.002, P = 0.9646; polynomial second order: r² = 0.16, P = 0.4469, data not shown) between root/shoot ratio and leaf K concentration was observed when the pod weight was excluded in calculation of root/shoot ratio. Previous studies did not find a consistent increase in the root/shoot ratio in other crops under K-limited conditions (Cakmak et al., 1994; Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Lawniczak et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2013). The inhibition of sugar translocation has been suggested to suppress the biomass allocation to the roots under K deficiency (Cakmak et al., 1994; Römheld and Kirkby, 2010). However, an increased root/shoot ratio has often been reported under N- or P-limited conditions (Römheld and Kirkby, 2010; Lenka and Lal, 2012; Singh et al., 2013b, 2014).

eCO₂ tended to stimulate dry matter production at maturity in all plant organs, except under severe K deficiency. The eCO₂ did not affect the biomass partitioning to leaves and roots but enhanced the partitioning to stems at maturity across K levels. However, eCO₂ decreased the partitioning to pods and seeds, especially under severe K deficiency. Thus, eCO₂ appears to increase the sensitivity of the reproductive organs (e.g., pods and seed yield) to K deficiency, particularly under severe K starvation. Increased sensitivity to K deficiency under eCO₂ has also been reported previously in cotton (Reddy and Zhao, 2005).

Growth Stimulation by eCO₂ Was Greatest under 0.5 mM K Followed by Control K Treatment, but Was Insignificant under Severe K Deficiency

Interestingly, the stimulation of TLA and DM under eCO₂ vs. aCO₂ was greater (60–80%) under the 0.5 mM K treatment than under the control K treatment (23–44%) across all harvests. Similarly, this stimulation of seed yield was 44 and 30% under 0.5 mM K and control K treatments, respectively. However, eCO₂-mediated stimulation of these traits was insignificant under severe K deficiency (0.02 mM K). A similar observation can also be derived in cotton grown under varying K nutrition levels at 360 and 720 μmol CO₂ from an earlier report by Reddy and Zhao (2005). However, unlike K deficiency, P deficiency consistently decreased the degree of stimulation by eCO₂ with decreasing P supply (Cure et al., 1988; Singh et al., 2013a, 2014). For instance, Singh et al. (2013a, 2014) reported a consistent decrease in the degree of eCO₂-mediated stimulation of photosynthesis, leaf area, and biomass production with decreasing P supply in soybean and cotton. In the current study, however, a consistent decline in the degree of P_net stimulation by eCO₂ with decreasing K supply was also observed. In addition, the lack of soybean growth response to eCO₂ under severe K deficiency was in agreement with the previous observations made under severe nutrient deficiency (Cure et al., 1988; Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Singh et al., 2013a, 2014)

One of the likely causes of greater eCO₂-mediated growth stimulation at 0.5 mM K may be a lesser degree of decrease in growth parameters at eCO₂ vs. aCO₂ when K supply was reduced from control level to 0.5 mM K. For instance, at maturity, the decrease in DM and seed yields under 0.5 mM K vs. control K was 42–52% under aCO₂ and 31–46% under eCO₂. Nevertheless, soybean achieved the highest productivity under control K supply for each CO₂ level. As compared with the control K treatment, the relative decline in growth parameters (e.g., P_net, TLA, DM, and seed yield) under severe K deficiency was almost parallel (>90%) for a given CO₂ level (aCO₂ or eCO₂). Thus, plants grown under a CO₂-enriched environment might experience a similar decrease in growth due to severe K deficiency as those grown under ambient CO₂. However, soybean grown under eCO₂ appeared to benefit by enhancing P_net and overall growth, to some extent, as compared with plants grown under aCO₂, particularly where K deficiency was not severe, indicating better utilization of tissue-available K (i.e., greater KUE). Thus, our hypothesis that depending on the severity of K deficiency eCO₂ will compensate, at least partially, the adverse effect of K starvation on plant growth and yield was largely validated.

KUE Was Enhanced under 0.5 mM K Treatment But Reduced under Severe K Deficiency, While eCO₂ Consistently Improved KUE and NUE

The mean tissue K concentration of the uppermost fully expanded leaves under control K treatment (21.5 mg g⁻¹) was comparable with those observed previously in soybean and other crops grown in fertilized fields or under controlled environments (Hanway and Weber, 1971; Andrews and Svec, 1976; Reddy and Zhao, 2005; Read et al., 2006). Despite a consistent decrease of KUpE with decreasing K supply, the averaged KUE was 65.68% greater at 0.5 mM vs. the control K treatment across the three harvests. This was in agreement with previous studies reporting higher P utilization efficiency of soybean plants grown under P starvation (Cure et al., 1988; Singh et al., 2014). Although, in the current study, the high KUE signified plant ability to better utilize tissue K concentration under 0.5 mM K supply than under control K levels, a loss of soybean growth still occurred. Nonetheless, it was apparent that the decrease in plant biomass was less than the reduction in tissue K concentration, which resulted in an increased KUE under 0.5 mM K treatment (Singh et al., 2015). In contrast, a substantial decline in the KUE under severe K deficiency may be attributable to the impairment of plant metabolic processes and a greater reduction of biomass accumulation than tissue K concentration (Gerardeaux et al., 2009; Singh et al., 2015). Impairment of the plant metabolic functions restricts plant growth and development when the tissue nutrient concentration falls below a threshold level (Siddiqi and Glass, 1981; Bednarz and Oosterhuis, 1999; Cakmak, 2005). Thus, a decline in the KUE under severe K deficiency was not surprising. An increased NUpE and tissue N accumulation led to a marked consistent reduction in the NUE in K-deficient plants. Lower NUE has also been previously reported in plants grown under P-deficient conditions (Singh et al., 2013a, 2014).

The soybean plants appeared to allocate the highest K concentration to the stems followed by the leaves. The K allocation to the leaves is critical for the photosynthetic processes, whereas nutrients allocated to the stems play a vital role in the internal nutrient recycling and transport mechanisms (Yan et al., 2016 and references therein). Since adequate K plays an important role in the phloem loading and assimilates transport, the observed high stem K concentration was not surprising (Huber, 1984; Cakmak, 2005).

Similar to the current study, lower concentrations of nutrient elements (e.g., K and N) under eCO₂ have often been reported and might be attributed to the increased demand, lower transpiration, increased growth, and leaf thickness (Cure et al., 1988; Taub and Wang, 2008). In fact, greater SLW (an indicator of leaf thickness), lower g_s and transpiration, and increased soybean growth were observed for the plants grown under eCO₂. The enhancement of KUE under eCO₂ indicated that soybean plants produced greater biomass and seed yield with relatively lower tissue K concentration under eCO₂ vs. aCO₂; thus, exhibiting an efficient utilization of tissue-available K. This also partly explains the greater proportion of the eCO₂-mediated stimulation of growth observed at 0.5 mM vs. the control K treatment. The lack of growth stimulation by eCO₂ under severe K deficiency might have been caused by very low tissue K concentration, which failed to support increased growth under eCO₂ as also found in another study (Reddy and Zhao, 2005).

Increased SLW, and Φ_PSII/Φ_CO2 Ratios but Decreased q_P, Chlorophyll Concentration, and Overall Plant Size Were Some of the Adaptation Mechanisms under K Deficiency

The increased SLW under K deficiency was in agreement with previous studies and might partly be attributed to the reduced cell expansion, accumulation of photosynthates due to limited translocation, and decreased plant size (Gerardeaux et al., 2009; Jin et al., 2011). The increased leaf thickness might also enhance the potential photosynthetic capacity of plant leaves (Garnier et al., 1999). A simultaneous decline of ${\text{F}}_{\text{v}}^{\prime }/{\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }{\Phi }_{\text{PSII}}$, and q_P under severe K deficiency indicated reduced efficiency and quantum yield of PSII, photochemical quenching (q_P), and interrupted electron transport chain (Singh and Reddy, 2015). The ${\text{F}}_{\text{v}}^{\prime }$/${\text{F}}_{\text{m}}^{\prime }$ has been found to be inversely related to non-photochemical quenching (Weis and Berry, 1987). However, the Φ_PSII value provides a direct estimate of the efficiency of light use for electron transport by PSII (Baker and Rosenqvist, 2004). Higher Φ_PSII/Φ_CO2 observed under severe K deficiency indicated the presence of an alternative electron sink including photorespiration to dissipate the excess energy of the PSII reaction center (Edwards and Baker, 1993; Jacob and Lawlor, 1993; Singh and Reddy, 2014, 2015). Lower leaf chlorophyll concentration can serve as a mechanism to avoid light absorption and to minimize plant sensitivity to light under K stress conditions (Cakmak, 2005; Singh and Reddy, 2016). Thus, the lower chlorophyll concentration and decreased Φ_PSII and q_P along with increased Φ_PSII/Φ_CO2 appeared to be some of the mechanisms employed to minimize light absorption and excitation pressures into the PSII reaction center under severe K deficiency (Singh and Reddy, 2016). The observed reduction of plant size (e.g., leaf area, biomass) under K-limited conditions might indicate a major strategy to reduce the overall nutrient demand and to support the allocation of carbon and energy toward the organ associated with acquiring the limited resources, such as leaves and roots (Bazzaz, 1997; Lenka and Lal, 2012).

Conclusions

eCO₂ showed the potential to enhance photosynthesis while reducing stomatal conductance under adequate K supply. This contributed to higher soybean productivity as represented by numerous growth and yield traits. However, under K deficiency, the beneficial effects of eCO₂ were diminished. In addition, the K × CO₂ interaction had a greater impact on the growth- and yield-related traits than on the photosynthesis-related parameters. Thus, K deficiency limited soybean growth traits more than photosynthetic processes regardless of the growth CO₂ levels. The overall lower leaf area coupled with the retarded growth primarily contributed to the lower biomass and yield under K deficiency. Soybean plants adjusted to the K deficiency by decreasing plant size to reduce nutrient demands, increasing SLW, and biomass partitioning to leaves throughout the growing season and to the roots at maturity. In addition, reduced TChl concentration and photochemical quenching, and greater Φ_PSII/Φ_CO2 appeared to assist in reducing light absorption and the excess excitation pressure of PSII to minimize photoinhibition in severely K-deficient plants. Despite a consistent decline in the KUpE, the increased KUE indicated the plants' ability to better utilize the available tissue K, except under severe K deficiency. The degree of soybean growth stimulation by eCO₂ was greater under 0.5 mM K than under the control K treatment, but such stimulation was not observed under severe K deficiency. Thus, the eCO₂ compensated, at least partially, for decreases in soybean growth and seed yield depending upon the K nutrition. A severe K deficiency diminished the positive effects of eCO₂ on P_net and total biomass production and completely suppressed the increased seed yield.

Author Contributions

SS and VR conceived the experiment. SS designed and conducted the experiment, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Both authors approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was authored as part of the Contributor's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Darryl Baxam (Engineering Technician) for help in maintaining the growth chambers and Mariam Manzoor (undergraduate student) for providing assistance during the experiment. We also thank reviewers and the editor for their comments that helped to improve the previous version of this manuscript.

References

Ahmed, F. E., Hall, A. E., and Madore, M. A. (1993). Interactive effects of high temperature and elevated carbon dioxide concentration on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Plant Cell Environ. 16, 835–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00505.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andrews, A. K., and Svec, L. V. (1976). Pod and leaf photosynthesis and disease incidence in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) with potassium fertilization. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 7, 345–363. doi: 10.1080/00103627609366647

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baker, N. R., and Rosenqvist, E. (2004). Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 1607–1621. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh196

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Battie-Laclau, P., Laclau, J.-P., Beri, C., Mietton, L., Muniz, M. R., Arenque, B. C., et al. (2014). Photosynthetic and anatomical responses of Eucalyptus grandis leaves to potassium and sodium supply in a field experiment. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 70–81. doi: 10.1111/pce.12131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bazzaz, F. A. (1997). “Allocation of resources in plants: state of the science and critical questions,” in Plant Resource Allocation, eds F.A. Bazzaz and J. Grace (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 1–38.

Bednarz, C. W., and Oosterhuis, D. M. (1999). Physiological changes associated with potassium deficiency in cotton. J. Plant Nutr. 22, 303–313. doi: 10.1080/01904169909365628

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bednarz, C. W., Oosterhuis, D. M., and Evans, R. D. (1998). Leaf photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination of cotton in response to potassium deficiency. Environ. Exp. Bot. 39, 131–139. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(97)00039-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bell, R. W., Brady, D., Plaskett, D., and Loneragan, J. F. (1987). Diagnosis of potassium deficiency in soybean. J. Plant Nutr. 10, 1947–1953. doi: 10.1080/01904168709363740

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brooks, A. (1986). Effects of phosphorus nutrition on ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activation, photosynthetic quantum yield and amounts of some Calvin-cycle metabolites in spinach leaves. Funct. Plant Biol. 13, 221–237. doi: 10.1071/pp9860221

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cakmak, I. (2005). The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 168, 521–530. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200420485

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cakmak, I., Hengeler, C., and Marschner, H. (1994). Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and carbohydrates in bean plants suffering from phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 45, 1245–1250. doi: 10.1093/jxb/45.9.1245

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Conroy, J. (1992). Influence of elevated atmospheric CO₂ concentrations on plant nutrition. Aust. J. Bot. 40, 445–456. doi: 10.1071/bt9920445

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cooper, R. B., Blaser, R. E., and Brown, R. H. (1967). Potassium nutrition effects on net photosynthesis and morphology of alfalfa. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 31, 231–235. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1967.03615995003100020026x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cure, J. D., Rufty, T. W., and Israel, D. W. (1988). Phosphorus stress effects on growth and seed yield responses of nonnodulated soybean to elevated carbon dioxide. Agron. J. 80, 897–902. doi: 10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000060012x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Edwards, G. E., and Baker, N. R. (1993). Can CO2 assimilation in maize leaves be predicted accurately from chlorophyll fluorescence analysis? Photosynth. Res. 37, 89–102. doi: 10.1007/BF02187468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garnier, E., Salager, J. L., Laurent, G., and Sonié, L. (1999). Relationships between photosynthesis, nitrogen and leaf structure in 14 grass species and their dependence on the basis of expression. New Phytol. 143, 119–129. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00426.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Genty, B., Briantais, J. M., and Baker, N. R. (1989). The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990, 87–92. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gerardeaux, E., Saur, E., Constantin, J., Porté, A., and Jordan-Meille, L. (2009). Effect of carbon assimilation on dry weight production and partitioning during vegetative growth. Plant Soil 324, 329–343. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-9950-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gill, M. A., Ahmad, M. I., and Yaseen, M. (1997). “Potassium-deficiency stress tolerance and potassium utilization efficiency in wheat genotypes,” in Plant Nutrition for Sustainable Food Production and Environment. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, eds T. Ando, K. Fujita, T. Mae, H. Matsumoto, S. Mori and J. Sekiya (Dordrecht; Boston, MA; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 321–322.

Google Scholar

Hanway, J. J., and Weber, C. R. (1971). N, P, and K percentages in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) plant parts. Agron. J. 63, 286–290. doi: 10.2134/agronj1971.00021962006300020027x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hewitt, E. J. (1952). Sand and Water Culture. Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition. Technical Communication No. 22. Commonwealth Bureau of Horticulture and Plantation, East Malling, Maidstone, Kent. Bucks: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux Farmham Royal. 187–190.

Google Scholar

Hoosbeek, M. R., Van Breemen, N., Vasander, H., Buttler, A., and Berendse, F. (2002). Potassium limits potential growth of bog vegetation under elevated atmospheric CO₂ and N deposition. Global Change Biol. 8, 1130–1138. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00535.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huber, S. C. (1984). Biochemical basis for effects of k-deficiency on assimilate export rate and accumulation of soluble sugars in soybean leaves. Plant Physiol. 76, 424–430. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.2.424

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

IPCC (2013). “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis,” in Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley (Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 1535.

Jacob, J., and Lawlor, D. W. (1993). Extreme phosphate deficiency decreases the in vivo CO₂/O₂ specificity factor of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase in intact leaves of sunflower. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 1635–1641. doi: 10.1093/jxb/44.11.1635

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jákli, B., Tavakol, E., Tränkner, M., Senbayram, M., and Dittert, K. (2017). Quantitative limitations to photosynthesis in K deficient sunflower and their implications on water-use efficiency. J. Plant Physiol. 209, 20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, S. H., Huang, J. Q., Li, X. Q., Zheng, B. S., Wu, J. S., Wang, Z. J., et al. (2011). Effects of potassium supply on limitations of photosynthesis by mesophyll diffusion conductance in Carya cathayensis. Tree Physiol. 31, 1142–1151. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanai, S., Moghaieb, R. E., El-Shemy, H. A., Panigrahi, R., Mohapatra, P. K., Ito, J., et al. (2011). Potassium deficiency affects water status and photosynthetic rate of the vegetative sink in green house tomato prior to its effects on source activity. Plant Sci. 180, 368–374. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lawniczak, A. E., Güsewell, S., and Verhoeven, J. T. A. (2009). Effect of N:K supply ratios on the performance of three grass species from herbaceous wetlands. Basic Appl. Ecol. 10, 715–725. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2009.05.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lenka, N. K., and Lal, R. (2012). Soil-related constraints to the carbon dioxide fertilization effect. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 31, 342–357. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2012.674461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X. T., Cao, P., Wang, X. G., Cao, M. J., and Yu, H. Q. (2011). Comparison of gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of low-potassium-tolerant and -sensitive soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars under low-potassium condition. Photosynthetica 49, 633–636. doi: 10.1007/s11099-011-0073-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthesis. Methods Enzymol. 148, 350–352. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Z., Lu, J., Pan, Y., Lu, P., Li, X., Cong, R., et al. (2016a). Anatomical variation of mesophyll conductance under potassium deficiency has a vital role in determining leaf photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 2428–2439. doi: 10.1111/pce.12795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Z., Ren, T., Pan, Y., Li, X., Cong, R., and Lu, J. (2016b). Differences on photosynthetic limitations between leaf margins and leaf centers under potassium deficiency for Brassica napus L. Sci. Rep. 6:21725. doi: 10.1038/srep21725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, Q., Scanlan, C., Bell, R., and Brennan, R. (2013). The dynamics of potassium uptake and use, leaf gas exchange and root growth throughout plant phenological development and its effects on seed yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum) on a low-K sandy soil. Plant Soil 373, 373–384. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1812-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marschner, H. (1986). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Google Scholar

Marschner, H., and Cakmak, I. (1989). High light intensity enhances chlorosis and necrosis in leaves of zinc, potassium, and magnesium deficient bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants. J. Plant Physiol. 134, 308–315. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(89)80248-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pettigrew, W. T. (2008). Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton. Physiol. Plant. 133, 670–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01073.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plank, C. O. (1992). Plant Analysis Reference Procedures for the Southern Region of the United States. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin #368. University of GA.

Read, J. J., Reddy, K. R., and Jenkins, J. N. (2006). Yield and fiber quality of cotton as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition. Eur. J. Agron. 24, 282–290. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reddy, K. R., and Zhao, D. L. (2005). Interactive effects of elevated CO₂ and potassium deficiency on photosynthesis, growth, and biomass partitioning of cotton. Field Crops Res. 94, 201–213. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, G. S., Payne, L., Milham, P., and Conroy, J. (1993). Nitrogen and phosphorus requirements of cotton and wheat under changing atmospheric CO₂ concentrations. Plant Soil 155–156, 231–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00025026

CrossRef Full Text

Römheld, V., and Kirkby, E. (2010). Research on potassium in agriculture: needs and prospects. Plant Soil 335, 155–180. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0520-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sale, P. W. G., and Campbell, L. C. (1986). Yield and composition of soybean seed as a function of potassium supply. Plant Soil 96, 317–325. doi: 10.1007/BF02375136

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saxton, A. M. (1998). A Macro for Converting Mean Separation Output to Letter Groupings in Proc Mixed. 23rd SAS User Group Intl. (Cary, NC: SAS Institute), 1243–1246.

Siddiqi, M. Y., and Glass, A. D. M. (1981). Utilization index: a modified approach to the estimation and comparison of nutrient utilization efficiency in plants. J. Plant Nutr. 4, 289–302. doi: 10.1080/01904168109362919

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S. K., and Reddy, V. R. (2014). Combined effects of phosphorus nutrition and elevated carbon dioxide concentration on chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthesis and nutrient efficiency of cotton. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 177, 892–902. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201400117

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S. K., and Reddy, V. R. (2015). Response of carbon assimilation and chlorophyll fluorescence to soybean leaf phosphorus across CO₂: alternative electron sink, nutrient efficiency and critical concentration. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 151, 276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.08.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S. K., and Reddy, V. R. (2016). Methods of mesophyll conductance estimation: its impact on key biochemical parameters and photosynthetic limitations in phosphorus stressed soybean across CO₂. Physiol. Plant. 157, 234–254. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S. K., Badgujar, G. B., Reddy, V. R., Fleisher, D. H., and Timlin, D. J. (2013a). Effect of phosphorus nutrition on growth and physiology of cotton under ambient and elevated carbon dioxide. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 199, 436–448. doi: 10.1111/jac.12033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S. K., Badgujar, G., Reddy, V. R., Fleisher, D. H., and Bunce, J. A. (2013b). Carbon dioxide diffusion across stomata and mesophyll and photo-biochemical processes as affected by growth CO₂ and phosphorus nutrition in cotton. J. Plant Physiol. 170, 801–813. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S. K., Barnaby, J. Y., Reddy, V. R., and Sicher, R. C. (2016). Varying response of the concentration and yield of soybean seed mineral elements, carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids, protein, and oil to phosphorus starvation and CO₂ enrichment. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1967. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01967

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S. K., Reddy, V. R., Fleisher, H. D., and Timlin, J. D. (2014). Growth, nutrient dynamics, and efficiency responses to carbon dioxide and phosphorus nutrition in soybean. J. Plant Int. 9, 838–849. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2014.959570

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S. K., Reddy, V. R., Sharma, M. P., and Agnihotri, R. (2015). “Dynamics of plant nutrients, utilization and uptake, and soil microbial community in crops under ambient and elevated carbon dioxide,” in Nutrient Use Efficiency: From Basics to Advances, eds A. Rakshit, H. B. Singh, and A. Sen (New Delhi: Springer India), 381–399.

Google Scholar

Smil, V. (1999). Crop residues: agriculture's largest harvest. Bioscience 49, 299–308. doi: 10.2307/1313613

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Staswick, P. E., Huang, J.-F., and Rhee, Y. (1991). Nitrogen and methyl jasmonate induction of soybean vegetative storage protein genes. Plant Physiol. 96, 130–136. doi: 10.1104/pp.96.1.130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Taub, D. R., and Wang, X. (2008). Why are nitrogen concentrations in plant tissues lower under elevated CO₂? A critical examination of the hypotheses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 50, 1365–1374. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00754.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weis, E., and Berry, J. A. (1987). Quantum efficiency of photosystem II in relation to 'energy'-dependent quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 894, 198–208. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(87)90190-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, Z., Li, P., Chen, Y., Han, W., and Fang, J. (2016). Nutrient allocation strategies of woody plants: an approach from the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus between twig stems and leaves. Sci. Rep 6:20099. doi: 10.1038/srep20099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, D., Oosterhuis, D. M., and Bednarz, C. W. (2001). Influence of potassium deficiency on photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, and chloroplast ultrastructure of cotton plants. Photosynthetica 39, 103–109. doi: 10.1023/A:1012404204910

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar