Comparative Analysis of the Complete Plastomes of Apostasia wallichii and Neuwiedia singapureana (Apostasioideae) Reveals Different Evolutionary Dynamics of IR/SSC Boundary among Photosynthetic Orchids

Apostasioideae, consists of only two genera, Apostasia and Neuwiedia, which are mainly distributed in Southeast Asia and northern Australia. The floral structure, taxonomy, biogeography, and genome variation of Apostasioideae have been intensively studied. However, detailed analyses of plastome composition and structure and comparisons with those of other orchid subfamilies have not yet been conducted. Here, the complete plastome sequences of Apostasia wallichii and Neuwiedia singapureana were sequenced and compared with 43 previously published photosynthetic orchid plastomes to characterize the plastome structure and evolution in the orchids. Unlike many orchid plastomes (e.g., Paphiopedilum and Vanilla), the plastomes of Apostasioideae contain a full set of 11 functional NADH dehydrogenase (ndh) genes. The distribution of repeat sequences and simple sequence repeat elements enhanced the view that the mutation rate of non-coding regions was higher than that of coding regions. The 10 loci—ndhA intron, matK-5′trnK, clpP-psbB, rps8-rpl14, trnT-trnL, 3′trnK-matK, clpP intron, psbK-trnK, trnS-psbC, and ndhF-rpl32—that had the highest degrees of sequence variability were identified as mutational hotspots for the Apostasia plastome. Furthermore, our results revealed that plastid genes exhibited a variable evolution rate within and among different orchid genus. Considering the diversified evolution of both coding and non-coding regions, we suggested that the plastome-wide evolution of orchid species was disproportional. Additionally, the sequences flanking the inverted repeat/small single copy (IR/SSC) junctions of photosynthetic orchid plastomes were categorized into three types according to the presence/absence of ndh genes. Different evolutionary dynamics for each of the three IR/SSC types of photosynthetic orchid plastomes were also proposed.

Introduction

Orchidaceae (orchids) is one of the most diverse and widespread families, comprising approximately 25,000 species in 880 genera (Chase et al., 2003). Their colorful flowers are often found in long sprays and stay fresh for months, giving orchids great ornamental as well as commercial value. According to molecular studies, orchids have been divided into five subfamilies: Apostasioideae, Vanilloideae, Cypripedioideae, Orchidoideae, and Epidendroideae (e.g., Givnish et al., 2015; Kim H.T. et al., 2015). Apostasioideae, the basal-most subfamily, consists of only two genera, Apostasia and Neuwiedia, with 18 species that are mainly distributed in Southeast Asia and northern Australia (Govaerts et al., 2012). These genera share some apomorphies with other orchids, e.g., enlarged petals (labella), a cylindrical structure of a fused gynoecium and anther (column) and small seeds, but they possess several unique characters, in particular their vessel cells in the root (Stern et al., 1993).

Because of their plesiomorphic floral characters and sister-group to the remaining orchids, members of the Apostasioideae have been intensively studied for their floral structure, taxonomy, biogeography, and genome variation. Kocyan and Endress (2001) analyzed the relationship between Apostasioideae and other orchids by studying their floral structure and development. The phylogenetic relationship within Apostasioideae was also evaluated based on ITS, trnL-trnF and matK sequences (Kocyan et al., 2004). Jersáková et al. (2013) reported a variable genome size between Apostasia and Neuwiedia, with a nearly 16-fold range. Kolanowska et al. (2016) assessed the evolution of cold tolerance among Apostasioideae species and proposed that their distribution was affected by climatic change. More recently, the genome sequence of Apostasia odorata has been sequenced (Lin et al., 2017). Although numerous studies have been conducted, there still is a lack of information regarding the molecular evolution and species identification of Apostasioideae.

Chloroplasts, responsible for photosynthesis in green plants, are one of the essential organelles in plant cells. Their own genomes (plastomes) vary in size from 59 (Delannoy et al., 2011) to 218 kb (Chumley et al., 2006). The plastome has long been a focus of research in plant molecular evolution and systematics due to its simple structure, highly conserved sequence, and maternal inheritance characteristics (Raubeson and Jansen, 2005). The plastome consists of four parts, including two copies of large inverted repeats (IRs) separated by a large single copy (LSC) and a small single copy (SSC) region (Jansen and Ruhlman, 2012). In general, plastomes are structurally highly conserved across land plants. However, structural rearrangements, gene loss, IR expansion and inversion occur in certain lineages and have been shown to be extremely informative in resolving deep phylogenetic relationships and species identification because they may exhibit less homoplasy than sequence data (Wu et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2008; Downie and Jansen, 2015). Moreover, the complete plastomes are an ideal resource for selecting mutational hotspots (Ahmed et al., 2013; Shaw et al., 2014; Downie and Jansen, 2015). Advances in next-generation sequencing techniques have improved our understanding of orchid plastome organization and evolution (e.g., Kim K. et al., 2015). For example, comparative analyses of orchid plastomes revealed the independent loss of NADH dehydrogenase (ndh) genes and diverse patterns of junctions between IR and SSC regions among orchid genera and subfamilies (e.g., Chang et al., 2006; Jheng et al., 2012; Kim H.T. et al., 2015). In addition, a plastome-wide investigation showed diversified hotspots in Cymbidium and Phalaenopsis (Yang et al., 2013; Shaw et al., 2014). Thus far, however, detailed analyses of apostasioid orchid plastome composition and structure and comparisons with those of other orchid subfamilies have not yet been conducted.

To characterize the plastome structure and evolution in the Apostasioideae subfamily, we sequenced the complete plastome sequences of Apostasia wallichii and Neuwiedia singapureana, which represent the genera Apostasia and Neuwiedia, respectively. The genome organization and the gene content and order were compared between the two species and with 45 previously reported photosynthetic orchid plastomes. Our aims were (1) to comparatively study the plastome structure and evolution of Apostasia and Neuwiedia, (2) to identify more powerful mutational hotspots for Apostasioideae, and (3) to evaluate the evolution of photosynthetic orchid plastomes and the mechanisms that underlie the shifts of their IR boundaries.

Materials and Methods

DNA Extraction and Plastome Sequencing

Healthy leaves (2 g) were harvested from individuals of A. wallichii and N. singapureana grown in the greenhouse of Nanjing Normal University. The total DNA from the leaves was extracted using a Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) based on the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality of the obtained DNA was examined using a NanoDrop 8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, United States). Extracted DNA that met the criteria for analysis (concentration >150 ng/μl, A260/A280 = 1.8–2.0, and A260/A230 > 1.7) was sequenced at 1Gene, Hangzhou (Hangzhou, China), using an Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencer. The sequencing depth was 3.75 Gb of 150-bp paired-end reads for each species.

Plastome Assembly, Annotation, and Comparison

The raw sequencing reads were quality trimmed with an error probability of <0.05 and de novo assembled using CLC Genomic Workbench 6.0.1 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Contigs of <30× sequencing depths were discarded. Since the remaining contigs may contain the information not only from chloroplast genome, but also from nuclear genome or from mitochondrial genome, these contigs were searched using NCBI Blastn against the plastome sequences of A. odorata (NC_030722). Matched contigs with E-values of <10^-10 were designated plastomic contigs. The gaps between plastomic contigs were closed by obtaining amplicons with specific primers and directly sequencing the amplicons. Junctions between the LSC/SSC and IRs were amplified and confirmed by PCR assays. Genes were annotated using DOGMA (Wyman et al., 2004) and tRNAscan-SE 1.21 (Schattner et al., 2005). The exact boundaries of the annotated genes were confirmed by their alignment with their orthologous genes from published orchid plastomes.

The plastome sequences of A. odorata (NC_030722), N. singapureana (KM 244735) have been published in GenBank of NCBI. However, detailed analyses of plastome composition and structure and comparisons with those of other orchid species have not yet been conducted. Therefore, in this study, they were downloaded and compared with our newly sequenced two plastomes of A. wallichii (LC199394) and N. singapureana (LC199503) by using the mVISTA software (Frazer et al., 2004). The N. singapureana (KM 244735) was used as the reference.

Repeat Sequence and SSR Element Analysis

The size and location of repeat sequences, including palindromic, reverse and direct repeats, within the newly sequenced plastomes of A. wallichii (LC199394) and N. singapureana (LC199503) were identified using REPuter software (Kurtz et al., 2001). The repeats were identified according to the following conditions: (1) hamming distance of 3, (2) sequence identity ≥90%, and (3) minimum repeat size ≥30 bp. The simple sequence repeat (SSR) elements were detected using the tool GMATo (Wang et al., 2013), and the criteria of the “Min-length” for mononucleotide SSRs, dinucleotide SSRs, and multi-nucleotide SSRs were set to be greater than 8, 5, and 3 units, respectively.

Estimation of Sequence Divergence

For mutational hotspot selection, at least two complete plastomes from different species within the study genus should be available (e.g., Ahmed et al., 2013; Shaw et al., 2014). However, only the plastome of N. singapureana was sequenced in Neuwiedia genus. Therefore, the plastomes of A. wallichii and A. odorata were used to screen for the most informative regions for the genus Apostasia. The sequences of protein-coding genes and non-coding loci, including intergenic spacers and introns, were retrieved from the plastomes of A. wallichii and A. odorata. Non-coding loci <150 bp were discarded. The sequence alignments were conducted using MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004) implemented in Mega 5.2 (Tamura et al., 2011). The sequences of protein-coding genes were aligned with the Align Codons option using the default parameters. The sequences of non-coding loci were first aligned with the default parameters and then realigned with the “Refining” option. The gaps located at the 5′- and 3′-ends of the alignments were excluded. The yielded alignments were used to count the pairwise nucleotide substitutions and the insertion and deletion (InDel) events using DnaSP v5 (Librado and Rozas, 2009). The sequence variability (SV) was calculated according to the method of Shaw et al. (2005, 2014) and Downie and Jansen (2015): SV% = (the number of nucleotide mutations + the number of InDel events)/(the number of conserved sites + the number of nucleotide mutations + the number of InDel events) × 100.

Substitution Rates and Positive Selection Analysis

The sequences of 66 protein-coding genes were retrieved from the 45 orchid plastomes and the outgroup plastome of Lilium longiflorum (Supplementary Table S1). The sequence alignments of these genes were separately performed and then concatenated to generate a data set with 44,898 characters. The synonymous (ds) and non-synonymous (dn) substitution rates were estimated with the CodeML program of PAML 4.8 (Yang, 2007). The parameters were set to the following: seqtype = 1, runmodel = -2. The SV for each non-coding locus of 10 genera from five orchid subfamilies: Epidendroideae (Cymbidium, Phalaenopsis, Masdevallia, Dendrobium, and Bletilla), Orchidoideae (Goodyera), Cypripedioideae (Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium), Vanilloideae (Vanilla), and Apostasioideae (Apostasia) were calculated in Niu et al. (2017) and this study. In order to evaluate the plastome-wide variation of substitution rates among orchid species, the synonymous (ds) and non-synonymous (dn) substitution rates for each protein-coding gene of those 10 genera were estimated in this study.

The selective pressure on the 66 genes from the 45 orchid species was also examined. Firstly, maximum likelihood tree was constructed using RAxML 8.0.2 (Stamatakis, 2014) based on the concatenated data set with a GTRGAMMA model. The genes of L. longiflorum were used as outgroup. Secondly, the selective pressure on the 66 genes was analyzed using the site models in the CodeML program. LRT P-values were determined for three pairs of site models: M1a vs. M2a, M0 vs. M3, and M7 vs. M8.

Statistical Analysis

Mesquite v. 3.02 (Maddison and Maddison, 2011) was employed to evaluate the correlation between the shift of IR boundaries and the retained ndh gene length. The boundary of IRs that was used for the comparison was a region from the 5′ end of ycf1 to the junction between the IR and SSC (Figure 6). Statistical analyses with Spearman and Mann–Whitney tests were performed using SPSS Statistics 20.0.

Results

Sequencing and Plastome Assembly

A total of approximately 3.75 Gb of 150 bp pair-end reads for A. wallichii (3.83 Gb) and N. singapureana (3.67 Gb) were obtained from the Illumina paired-end sequencing. The de novo assembly produced 25,033 contigs for A. wallichii, 19,755 contigs for N. singapureana. Those contigs were searched against the plastome sequences of A. odorata (NC_030722). Then, 52 contigs were obtained with E-values <10^-10 and mean coverage depth >30× for A. wallichii, 87 contigs for N. singapureana. Among them, five contigs that longer than 18 kb resulting in a nearly complete draft genome for A. wallichii. Eleven contigs that longer than 9 kb were used for assembling the plastome of N. singapureana. Gaps between contigs (5 gaps in A. wallichii plastome and 11 gaps in N. singapureana plastome) were closed by obtaining amplicons from PCR procedures. After assembly and gap closure, two complete plastomes were obtained. Furthermore, the four junctions between the LSC/SSC and IRs of each plastomes were also confirmed by PCR amplification.

Plastome Features of Two Newly Sequenced Orchids

The newly sequenced plastomes of A. wallichii (LC199394) and N. singapureana (LC199503) were circular and contained 156,126 and 161,068 bp, respectively (Figure 1). The plastomes displayed the typical quadripartite structure, consisting of a pair of IRs (26,452–26,991 bp) separated by the LSC (83,035–89,031 bp) and SSC (20,187–18,058 bp) regions (Table 1). The gene content of the two plastomes was relatively conserved with identical complements, each containing 79 unique protein-coding genes, 30 unique tRNA genes, and four unique rRNA genes. The overall AT content was 63.93–64.01%, indicating nearly identical levels among the orchid plastomes. The AT content was 66.70–66.79%, 71.26–70.83%, and 56.81–67.14% in the LSC, SSC, and IR regions, respectively (Table 1). Notably, the region from trnS-GCU to trnS-GGA was reversed in the two Apostasia plastomes. The four plastomes of Apostasioideae were compared and plotted using mVISTA, with N. singapureana (KM 244735) as the reference (Supplementary Figure S1). As expected, the SC regions were more divergent than the IR regions. Furthermore, the non-coding regions (intergenic spacers and introns) exhibited higher divergence levels than coding regions.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Plastome map of Neuwiedia singapureana. The plastome of Apostasia wallichii has an identical structure to that of N. singapureana, except for an inversion from trnS-GCU to trnS-GGA. The genes outside and inside the circle are transcribed clockwise and counterclockwise, respectively.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Characteristics of the newly sequenced two Apostasioideae plastomes.

Repeat and SSR Analysis

We employed REPuter to analyze the repeat sequences of the A. wallichii and N. singapureana plastomes. The total number of repeats was 38 in A. wallichii and 42 in N. singapureana. A. wallichii contained 15 forward repeats, 18 palindrome repeats, and 5 reverse repeats (Figure 2A and Supplementary Table S2). The length of these repeats ranged from 30 to 156 bp, and a copy length of 30–49 bp was most common (32 repeats), followed by >90 bp (three repeats), 50–69 bp (two repeats), and 70–89 bp (one repeat). N. singapureana contained 18 forward repeats, 16 palindrome repeats, and 8 reverse repeats. The length of the 42 repeats ranged from 31 to 140 bp, with a copy length of 30 to 49 bp being most common (31 repeats), while >90 bp was the least common (one repeat). In addition, our analyses revealed that the proportions of repeats located in non-coding regions were higher than in coding regions. For example, the proportion of the repeats located in non-coding regions of the N. singapureana plastome was 79.76%, while the repeats located in coding regions only accounted for 16.67%.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. Analysis of repeat sequences and SSR elements in the plastomes of Apostasia wallichii and Neuwiedia singapureana. (A) Number of repeat sequences identified by REPuter. (B) Number of SSR elements determined by GMATo.

The SSRs contained in the two plastomes were also counted (Figure 2B). The total number of SSRs identified in the A. wallichii and N. singapureana plastomes was 225 and 234, respectively. Among them, A- and T-mononucleotides were the most abundant SSRs in both plastomes, while the G- or C-repeats were rare. The number of dinucleotide repeats was slightly higher than other repeats, such as tri-, tetra-, and penta-nucleotides. Similar to the repeat sequences, the ratios of SSRs located in non-coding regions were higher than in coding regions (Mann–Whitney two-sided, P < 0.05).

Sequence Divergence of Apostasia Plastomes

We identified 79 coding genes and 89 syntenic non-coding regions longer than 150 bp in the two Apostasia plastomes. The SV for these loci was calculated. The SV value for each coding gene except for a few variable genes (ycf1, rps16, rpl20, and psaJ) was below 2.5%, with an average of 0.86% (Supplementary Table S3). The SV in non-coding regions was significantly higher, by approximately 2.6-fold, than that in coding regions (Mann–Whitney two-sided, P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S4). In the non-coding regions, the SV was significantly higher in SC than in IR regions (Mann–Whitney two-sided, P < 0.05), which demonstrated that the IR region had a lower sequence divergence than the SC regions. Correlations were significant in the comparisons of (1) SV and GC content (Spearman’s r = -0.686, P < 0.01), (2) InDels and substitutions (Spearman’s r = 0.75, P < 0.01), (3) InDels and GC content (Spearman’s r = -0.46, P < 0.01), and (4) substitutions and GC content (Spearman’s r = -0.59, P < 0.01). These results indicated that the extent of mutation was correlated with low GC content. Furthermore, the top 10 loci—ndhA intron, matK-5′trnK, clpP-psbB, rps8-rpl14, trnT-trnL, 3′trnK-matK, clpP intron, psbK-trnK, trnS-psbC, and ndhF-rpl32—listed in Figure 3 were identified as mutational hotspots for the Apostasia plastome that can be used for phylogenetic analyses.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Top 10 syntenic intergenic and intronic loci with the highest sequence variability (%) in Apostasia plastomes.

Non-synonymous (dn) and Synonymous (ds) Substitution Rates among Orchid Species

Among the plastomes of all orchid species, the estimated synonymous (ds) and non-synonymous (dn) substitution rates were 0.2415–0.3439 (substitutions per ds sites) and 0.0387–0.0784 (substitutions per dn site), separately (Figure 4). The plastomes of four subfamilies (Epidendroideae, Orchidoideae, Cypripedioideae, and Apostasioideae) showed diversified substitution rates, with dn substitution rates ranging from 0.0387 to 0.0467 and ds substitution rates ranging from 0.2415 to 0.2927, while Vanilloideae (dn: 0.0753–0.0784, ds: 0.3383–0.3439) exhibited significantly higher substitution rates than those of the other orchid subfamilies (Mann–Whitney two-sided, P < 0.01).

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. Comparison of non-synonymous (dn) and synonymous (ds) substitution rates among the five orchid subfamilies (Epidendroideae, Orchidoideae, Cypripedioideae, Vanilloideae, and Apostasioideae). The substitutions rates were calculated for the whole plastome by using Lilium longiflorum as the reference. Each subfamily is color coded. Of note, the plastomes of Epidendroideae, Orchidoideae, Cypripedioideae, and Apostasioideae showed diversified substitution rates in their plastomic protein-coding sequences.

Moreover, the dn and ds rates were also calculated for each protein-coding genes (Figure 5). The result displayed a diversified dn and ds values among orchid genera. (1) Genes estimated with the highest dn (ds) rate might not have the highest value for ds (dn). For example, the gene of rpl22 has the highest dn value in Apostasia, whereas, the ds value was the lowest among all the orchid genera. (2) In one orchid genus, the substitutions rates among different genes were variable. For example, in the Vanilla plastomes, the dn rate of clpP was the highest among all protein-coding genes. The dn rate of psbB, the gene adjacent to clpP, was lower than most genes. In addition, both of them have showed a low degree of ds rates. (3) The substitution rates of protein-coding genes among different orchid genera were also variable. For example, the gene of psbC showed the highest ds rates in the Apostasia but lowest in the Phalaenopsis. However, the ds rates of rpl36 exhibited an opposite result. These results indicated that the substitution rates of plastid protein-coding genes were diversified within and among different orchid genus.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. The mean non-synonymous (dn) and synonymous (ds) substitution ratios among 10 genera of orchids. The mean value was calculate from 11 species for Cymbidium, two species for Masdevallia, three species for Phalaenopsis, four species for Dendrobium, two species for Bletilla, three species for Goodyera, two species for Cypripedium, two species for Paphiopedilum, two species for Vanilla, and two species for Apostasia. The SD bars for each genus are not indicated. (A) Non-synonymous (dn) substitution rates for 66 plastomic protein-coding genes are depicted for 10 genera of orchids. (B) Synonymous (ds) substitution rates.

Three pairs of site models (M1a vs. M2a, M0 vs. M3, and M7 vs. M8) were used to investigate the possible role of positive selection in driving plastid protein-coding gene evolution in orchid species. The comparison showed that 12 genes related to photosynthetic electron transport and related processes (psbH, atpF, and rbcL), gene expression (rpoA, rpoC1, rpoC2, rpl2, rpl16, and rps12), and other functions (accD, matK, and ycf2) had been subjected to positive selection (LRT M1a vs. M2a, M0 vs. M3, and M7 vs. M8, all P < 0.01) (Supplementary Table S5).

Comparison of Sequences Flanking IR/SSC Junctions among Photosynthetic Orchid Plastomes

Sequences flanking IR/SSC junctions vary among photosynthetic orchid plastomes (e.g., Yang et al., 2013; Kim H.T. et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2015; Niu et al., 2017). To assess the variability of IR/SSC boundaries, we sampled and categorized 34 available orchid plastomes from 19 genera into three types according to the presence or absence of ndh genes. As shown in Figure 6, type A, which has all 11 functional ndh genes, contains four genera from Epidendroideae (Calanthe, Elleanthus, Masdevallia, and Sobralia), three genera from Orchidoideae (Goodyera, Habenaria, and Ludisia), one genus from Cypripedioideae (Cypripedium), and the two genera from Apostasioideae (Apostasia and Neuwiedia). Type B has no ndh genes in the SSC region and includes two genera from Cypripedioideae (Paphiopedilum) and Vanilloideae (Vanilla). Type C, which has independently lost the ndh genes in SSC regions, consists of six genera from Epidendroideae (Cymbidium, Cattleya, Oncidium, Dendrobium, Phalaenopsis, and Bletilla) and one genus from Cypripedioideae (Phragmipedium). In addition, we determined the degree of IR expansion/contraction based on the length of a region from the 5′ end of the ycf1 gene to the IR and SSC junction. The IR lengths after expansion/contraction were significantly different among the three types of plastomes (Mann–Whitney two-sided, all P < 0.05).

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. Comparison of IR/SSC boundaries among photosynthetic orchid plastomes. The pseudogenes are denoted by “Ψ.” J_SA and J_Sb were stand for the junctions between IR_A/SSC and IR_B/SSC. The variable length of the 5′ end of ycf1 to J_SA and the intergenic spacer regions adjacent to J_SA and J_Sb are indicated. The most variable plastomes of Cymbidium tracyanum and Cymbidium mannii were used to represent the genus Cymbidium.

In type A plastomes, the sequences flanking the IR/SSC junctions have similar genic architectures (Figure 6). Their junctions of IR_A/SSC are located approximately 1 kb downstream of the 5′ end of ycf1. Conversely, the boundaries of IR/SSC among the four type B species have expanded to variable positions (Figure 6). The different IR contraction lengths between the ndh-containing and ndh-lacking groups (Mann–Whitney two-sided, P < 0.05) indicated that the full set of ndh genes plays a role in IR/SSC junction stability. Among the orchid species from type C, the junctions of IR/SSC were variable due to the expansion/contraction of IRs (Figure 6). For example, the junction of IR_B/SSC was located at the spacer region adjacent to rpl32 in most species or to the 3′ end of ndhF among Cymbidium and Dendrobium, while the junctions of IR_A/SSC were located in ycf1, ranging from 9 to 664 bp. The correlation analysis based on the phylogenetic method suggested that the expansion/contraction length of IRs in type C is strongly correlated with the retained ndh gene length (Supplementary Figure S2, y = 0.136x, R² = 0.847, P < 0.05).

Discussion

Architecture of Plastid Genomes in Apostasioideae

Complete plastome sequencing and comparative genome analyses have revealed the high conservation of orchid plastomes in size, structure, and gene order and content (e.g., Chang et al., 2006; Jheng et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2013; Kim H.T. et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2015). The structure of Apostasioideae plastomes is similar to that of most orchid plastomes, with the only difference being a large inversion from trnS-GCU to trnS-GGA in the Apostasia plastomes. Plastome rearrangement was also reported for the plastome of Cypripedium, which has an inversion from atpA to petG (Lin et al., 2015). Local disruptions of gene order occur in orchid plastomes because of the loss of ndh genes. A character map reconstructed by Kim H.T. et al. (2015) suggested that the ndh genes have experienced independent loss in the orchid genera but were present in the common ancestor of orchids. The full set of 11 functional ndh genes observed in both of these Apostasioideae plastomes confirmed their results.

Larger repeats are generally rare among angiosperm plastomes and are considered to be more prevalent in those plastomes that have undergone major changes in genome organization (Chumley et al., 2006; Haberle et al., 2008; Weng et al., 2014). Ahmed et al. (2012) reported the association between repeats, InDels and substitution imply that the regions, which have repeat sequences, tend to exhibit higher sequence variation. In the repeat analysis of the newly sequenced plastomes, 38 and 42 repeats of 30 bp or longer were identified in A. wallichii and N. singapureana plastomes, respectively. Most of these repeats are located in the non-coding regions, including some highly variable regions, such as 5′trnK-matK, ndhF-rpl32, and rps15-ycf1. These findings enhance the view that the evolution of non-coding regions was higher than that of coding regions. The repeat sequences have also played an important role in rearrangement in plastomes (Downie and Jansen, 2015; Asaf et al., 2016; Choi et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016). However, several repeats occurred in the same genes (ycf1 and ycf2) or genes with similar functions (pasA/psaB and trnS-GCU/trnS-UGA/trnS-GGA). These repeated elements are similar in number, size, and location to those of other angiosperms whose plastomes are structurally unrearranged (Ruhlman et al., 2006; Yi et al., 2012). Therefore, we suggest that these repeats may have been caused by replication slippage, which generates improper sequence recombination (Palmer, 1991; Downie and Jansen, 2015). Additionally, the SSRs contained in A. wallichii and N. singapureana were counted. These new resources will be potentially useful for the phylogenetic and population genetics studies in the Apostasia and Neuwiedia genera.

Disproportional Plastome-Wide Variation among Orchid Species

Plastid non-coding regions evolve through accumulated nucleotide substitutions and microstructural mutations such as InDels. However, Kelchner (2000) suggested that nucleotide substitutions and InDels would not be randomly distributed throughout plastomes. Morton (1995) and Decker-Walters et al. (2004) proposed that the occurrence of nucleotide substitutions and microstructural mutations depends strongly on sequence context. The extents of SV, InDel events, and substitution rates are related to low GC content, which suggests that mutational hotspots in orchid plastomes are accompanied by biased AT compositions. Indeed, the GC contents of the top 10 mutational hotspots of Apostasia plastome were lower than that of most other loci. AT-based mutational hotspots are also observed in taro (Ahmed et al., 2012, 2013), rice (Yamane et al., 2006), and cycad (Wu and Chaw, 2015). AT richness contributes to potentially deleterious recombination and replication errors, which may explain its impact on patterns of substitution and the distribution of InDels.

The top 10 loci—ndhA intron, matK-5′trnK, clpP-psbB, rps8-rpl14, trnT-trnL, 3′trnK-matK, clpP intron, psbK-trnK, trnS-psbC, and ndhF-rpl32—that have the highest degrees of SV were identified as mutational hotspots for the Apostasia plastome. Compared to the mutational hotspots identified in Cymbidium, Phalaenopsis, and other orchid genera (Yang et al., 2013; Shaw et al., 2014; Niu et al., 2017), the top 10 mutational hotspots are variable among different orchid genera. Although different criteria and methods could affect the identification of the hotspots, our findings in this study suggest that mutational hotspots in orchid plastomes were genus-specific.

Shaw et al. (2014) concluded that a plastid region identified as highly variable in one group might not be consistently the most variable across other group, which suggested that the evolution rates of the non-coding regions among different plant lineages were diversified. In line with this, the current research also revealed that the mutational hotspots were genus-specific among different orchid genera. These results indicated that the evolution rates of the non-coding regions among orchid genera were variable. Moreover, the coding genes also exhibited a diversified evolution rate not only in one orchid specie, but also among different orchid genera. Therefore, we proposed that there is a disproportional plastome-wide variation of substitution rates among orchid species.

Although the substitution rates among protein-coding genes are variable in photosynthetic orchid plastomes, some housekeeping genes related to photosynthesis showed evidence of positive selection pressure. As positive selection pressure would directly affect photosynthetic efficiency, whether it can benefit orchid adaptation is worthy of further investigations.

Dynamic Evolution of Three IR/SSC Types in Photosynthetic Orchid Plastomes

The expansion and contraction of the border position of the IR can be used to provide relationship evidence in phylogenetic analysis and have been used successfully in resolving relationships of major clades in ferns (Gao et al., 2009), Pinaceae (Lin et al., 2010), Poaceae (Guisinger et al., 2010), Apiaceae (Downie and Jansen, 2015), and many monocots (Wang et al., 2008). However, although overall genomic structures and gene orders are highly conserved, orchid plastomes exhibited obvious differences at the IR/SSC boundaries, which cannot readily be used in a phylogenetic analysis. Moreover, the ndh genes in SSC regions have been independently lost across orchid genera (e.g., Kim H.T. et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2015; Niu et al., 2017). The variations in the sequences flanking IR/SSC junctions and the independent loss of ndh genes have attracted the intense attention of researchers, leading to the publication of numerous plastomic comparative studies. For example, Luo et al. (2014) suggested dividing the orchid plastomes into four types based on distinct characteristics at the IR/SC junctions. Kim H.T. et al. (2015) proposed that the instability of the IR/SSC junctions in orchid was strongly correlated with the deletion of the ndhF gene. However, there is still a lack of information on the mechanism underlying the variations in the sequences flanking the IR/SSC junctions of orchid plastomes.

In the present study, we categorized 34 available photosynthetic orchid plastomes from 19 genera into three types according to the presence of ndh genes. The different IR contraction lengths between the plastomes from type A and type B and the correlation between the expansion/contraction length of IRs and the retained ndh gene length in type C lead us to conclude that the variations in sequences flanking the IR/SSC junctions of photosynthetic orchid plastomes are associated with the loss of ndh genes. Furthermore, we propose different evolutionary dynamics for each of the three IR/SSC types of orchid plastomes. For the plastomes in type A, the border position of the IR and SSC was stable. The IR_A and SSC first experienced an expansion from 991 bp in Apostasia to 1462 bp in Cypripedium and then contracted progressively to downstream of the 5′ end of ycf1, while the junction of IR_B and SSC was located between 17 bp adjacent to ndhF and 76 bp near the 5′ end of ndhF. For the plastomes in type B, the boundaries of IR/SSC have expanded to variable positions due to the loss of ndh genes. The sequences flanking the IR/SSC junctions vary among the type C plastomes. The correlation analysis based on phylogenetics indicated that the variations in IR/SSC junctions are strongly correlated with the retained ndh gene length. However, more molecular data still needs to be collected for intensifying our understanding of the dynamic evolution of sequence variations among IR/SSC junctions.

Author Contributions

XD designed the study. ZN, SZ, JP, and WL performed the experiments. ZN, JP, LL, and QX analyzed the data. ZN wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31170300 and No. 31670330) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions to XD.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.01713/full#supplementary-material

FIGURE S1 | Sequence identity plots among the plastomes of A. wallichii (LC199394), A. odorata (NC_030722), and N. singapureana (LC199503) with the N. singapureana (KM 244735) sequence as the reference. The region from trnS-GCU to trnS-GGA in A. wallichii and A. odorata plastomes is reversed for comparison.

FIGURE S2 | Relationship between the contraction length of IRs and the retained ndh gene length in group C. The phylogenetic comparative method indicated that the expansion/contraction of IRs is significantly correlated with the loss of ndh genes (y = 0.136x, R² = 0.847, P < 0.05).

References

Ahmed, I., Biggs, P. J., Matthews, P. J., Collins, L. J., Hendy, M. D., and Lockhart, P. J. (2012). Mutational dynamics of aroid chloroplast genomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 4, 1316–1323. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahmed, I., Matthews, P. J., Biggs, P. J., Naeem, M., Mclenachan, P. A., and Lockhart, P. J. (2013). Identification of chloroplast genome loci suitable for high-resolution phylogeographic studies of Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott (Araceae) and closely related taxa. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13, 929–937. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asaf, S., Khan, A. L., Khan, A. R., Waqas, M., Kang, S. M., Khan, M. A., et al. (2016). Complete chloroplast genome of Nicotiana otophora and its comparison with related species. Front. Plant Sci. 7:843. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00843

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, C. C., Lin, H. C., Lin, I. P., Chow, T. Y., Chen, H. H., Chen, W. H., et al. (2006). The chloroplast genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): comparative analysis of evolutionary rate with that of grasses and its phylogenetic implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 279–291. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chase, M. W., Cameron, K. M., Barrett, R. L., and Freudenstein, J. V. (2003). “DNA data and Orchidaceae systematics: a new phylogenetic classification,” in Orchid Conservation, eds K. W. Dixon, S. P. Kell, R. L. Barrett, and P. J. Cribb (Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Press), 69–89.

Google Scholar

Choi, K. S., Chung, M. G., and Park, S. J. (2016). The complete chloroplast genome sequences of three Veroniceae species (Plantaginaceae): comparative analysis and highly divergent regions. Front. Plant Sci. 7:355. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00355

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chumley, T. W., Palmer, J. D., Mower, J. P., Fourcade, H. M., Calie, P. J., Boore, J. L., et al. (2006). The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pelargonium × hortorum: organization and evolution of the largest and most highly rearranged chloroplast genome of land plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 2175–2190. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Decker-Walters, D. S., Chung, S. M., and Staub, J. E. (2004). Plastid sequence evolution: a new pattern of nucleotide substitutions in the Cucurbitaceae. J. Mol. Evol. 58, 606–614. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-2585-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Delannoy, E., Fujii, S., Colas des Francs-Small, C., Brundrett, M., and Small, I. (2011). Rampant gene loss in the underground orchid Rhizanthella gardneri highlights evolutionary constraints on plastid genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2077–2086. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Downie, S. R., and Jansen, R. K. (2015). A comparative analysis of whole plastid genomes from the Apiales: expansion and contraction of the inverted repeat, mitochondrial to plastid transfer of DNA, and identification of highly divergent noncoding regions. Syst. Bot. 40, 336–351. doi: 10.1600/036364415X686620

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Edgar, R. C. (2004). MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frazer, K. A., Pachter, L., Poliakov, A., Rubin, E. M., and Dubchak, I. (2004). VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W273–W279. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, L., Yi, X., Yang, Y. X., Su, Y. J., and Wang, T. (2009). Complete chloroplast genome sequence of a tree fern Alsophila spinulosa: insights into evolutionary changes in fern chloroplast genomes. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:130. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Givnish, T. J., Spalink, D., Ames, M., Lyon, S. P., Hunter, S. J., Zuluaga, A., et al. (2015). Orchid phylogenomics and multiple drivers of their extraordinary diversification. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 2108–2111. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Govaerts, R., Bernet, P., Kratochvil, K., Gerlach, G., Carr, G., et al. (2012). World Checklist of Orchidaceae. Available at: http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/ [accessed September 28, 2012].

Google Scholar

Guisinger, M. M., Chumley, T. W., Kuehl, J. V., Boore, J. L., and Jansen, R. K. (2010). Implications of the plastid genome sequence of Typha (Typhaceae, Poales) for understanding genome evolution in Poaceae. J. Mol. Evol. 70, 149–166. doi: 10.1007/s00239-009-9317-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haberle, R. C., Fourcade, H. M., Boore, J. L., and Jansen, R. K. (2008). Extensive rearrangements in the chloroplast genome of Trachelium caeruleum are associated with repeats and tRNA genes. J. Mol. Evol. 66, 350–361. doi: 10.1007/s00239-008-9086-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jansen, R. K., and Ruhlman, T. A. (2012). “Plastid genomes in seed plants,” in Genomics of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria, eds R. Bock and V. Knoop (Dordrecht: Springer), 103–126. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2920-9_5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jersáková, J., Trávní£ek, P., Kubátová, B., Krej£íková, J., Urfus, T., Liu, Z.-J., et al. (2013). Genome size variation in the subfamily Apostasioideae: filling the phylogenetic gap in orchids. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 172, 95–105. doi: 10.1111/boj.12027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jheng, C. F., Chen, T. C., Lin, J. Y., Chen, T. C., Wu, W. L., and Chang, C. C. (2012). The comparative chloroplast genomic analysis of photosynthetic orchids and developing DNA markers to distinguish Phalaenopsis orchids. Plant Sci. 190, 62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kelchner, S. A. (2000). The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Ann. Mo. Bot Gard. 87, 499–527. doi: 10.2307/2666142

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H. T., Kim, J. S., Moore, M. J., Neubig, K. M., Williams, N. H., Whitten, W. M., et al. (2015). Seven new complete plastome sequences reveal rampant independent loss of the ndh gene family across orchids and associated instability of the inverted repeat/small single-copy region boundaries. PLOS ONE 10:e0142215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142215

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, K., Lee, S. C., Lee, J., Yu, Y., Yang, K., Choi, B. S., et al. (2015). Complete chloroplast and ribosomal sequences for 30 accessions elucidate evolution of Oryza AA genome species. Sci. Rep. 5:15655. doi: 10.1038/srep15655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kocyan, A., and Endress, P. K. (2001). Floral structure and development of Apostasia and Neuwiedia (Apostasioideae) and their relationships to other Orchidaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162, 847–867. doi: 10.1086/320781

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kocyan, A., Qiu, Y. L., Endress, P. K., and Conti, E. (2004). A phylogenetic analysis of Apostasioideae (Orchidaceae) based on ITS, trnL-F and matK sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 247, 203–213. doi: 10.1007/s00606-004-0133-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kolanowska, M., Mystkowskal, K., Kras, M., Dudek, M., and Konowalik, K. (2016). Evolution of the climatic tolerance and postglacial range changes of the most primitive orchids (Apostasioideae) within Sundaland, Wallacea and Sahul. PeerJ 4:e2384. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurtz, S., Choudhuri, J. V., Ohlebusch, E., Schleiermacher, C., Stoye, J., and Giegerich, R. (2001). REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 4633–4642. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Librado, P., and Rozas, J. (2009). DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, C. P., Huang, J. P., Wu, C. S., Hsu, C. Y., and Chaw, S. M. (2010). Comparative chloroplast genomics reveals the evolution of Pinaceae genera and subfamilies. Genome Biol. Evol. 2, 504–517. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evq036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, C. S., Chen, J. J., Huang, Y. T., Chan, M. T., Daniell, H., Chang, W. J., et al. (2015). The location and translocation of ndh genes of chloroplast origin in the Orchidaceae family. Sci. Rep. 5:9040. doi: 10.1038/srep09040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, C. S., Chen, J. J. W., Chiu, C. C., Hsiao, H. C. W., Yang, C. J., Jin, X. H., et al. (2017). Concomitant loss of NDH complex-related genes within chloroplast and nuclear genomes in some orchids. Plant J. 90, 994–1006. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, J., Hou, B. W., Niu, Z. T., Liu, W., Xue, Q. Y., and Ding, X. Y. (2014). Comparative chloroplast genomes of photosynthetic orchids: insights into evolution of the Orchidaceae and development of molecular markers for phylogenetic applications. PLOS ONE 9:e99016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R. (2011). Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 3.02. Available: http://mesquiteproject.org

Google Scholar

Morton, B. R. (1995). Neighboring base composition and transversion/transition bias in a comparison of rice and maize chloroplast noncoding regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 9717–9721. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9717

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niu, Z. T., Xue, Q. Y., Zhu, S. Y., Sun, J., Liu, W., and Ding, X. Y. (2017). The complete plastome sequences of four orchid species: insights into the evolution of the Orchidaceae and the utility of plastomic mutational hotspots. Front. Plant Sci. 8:715. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00715

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmer, J. D. (1991). “Plastid chromosomes: structure and evolution,” in Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol. 7A, eds L. Bogorad and I. K. Vasil (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 5–53.

Google Scholar

Raubeson, L. A., and Jansen, R. K. (2005). “Chloroplast genomes of plants,” in Plant Diversity and Evolution: Genotypic and Phenotypic Variation in Higher Plants, ed. R. J. Henry (London: CAB International), 45–68. doi: 10.1079/9780851999043.0045

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruhlman, T., Lee, S. B., Jansen, R. K., Hostetler, J. B., Tallon, L. J., Town, C. D., et al. (2006). Complete plastid genome sequence of Daucus carota: implications for biotechnology and phylogeny of angiosperms. BMC Genomics 7:222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schattner, P., Brooks, A. N., and Lowe, T. M. (2005). The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W686–W689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shaw, J., Lickey, E. B., Beck, J. T., Farmer, S. B., Liu, W., Miller, J., et al. (2005). The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am. J. Bot. 92, 142–166. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.1.142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shaw, J., Shafer, H. L., Leonard, O. R., Kovach, M. J., Schorr, M., and Morris, A. B. (2014). Chloroplast DNA sequence utility for the lowest phylogenetic and phylogeographic inferences in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare IV. Am. J. Bot. 101, 1987–2004. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stamatakis, A. (2014). RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stern, W. L., Cheadle, V. I., and Thorsch, J. (1993). Apostasiads, systematic anatomy, and the origins of Orchidaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 111, 411–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1993.tb01913.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. (2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, R. J., Cheng, C. L., Chang, C. C., Wu, C. L., Su, T. M., and Chaw, S. M. (2008). Dynamics and evolution of the inverted repeat-large single copy junctions in the chloroplast genomes of monocots. BMC Evol. Biol. 8:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-36

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Lu, P., and Luo, Z. (2013). GMATo: a novel tool for the identification and analysis of microsatellites in large genomes. Bioinformation 9, 541–544. doi: 10.6026/97320630009541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weng, M. L., Blazier, J. C., Govindu, M., and Jansen, R. K. (2014). Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats, and nucleotide substitution rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 645–659. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst257

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, C. S., and Chaw, S. M. (2015). Evolutionary stasis in cycad plastomes and the first case of plastome GC-biased gene conversion. Genome Biol. Evol. 7, 2000–2009. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, C. S., Wang, Y. N., Liu, S. M., and Chaw, S. M. (2007). Chloroplast genome (cpDNA) of Cycas taitungensis and 56 cp protein-coding genes of Gnetum parvifolium: insights into cpDNA evolution and phylogeny of extant seed plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1366–1379. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wyman, S. K., Jansen, R. K., and Boore, J. L. (2004). Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20, 3252–3255. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamane, K., Yano, K., and Kawahara, T. (2006). Pattern and rate of Indel evolution inferred from whole chloroplast intergenic regions in sugarcane, maize and rice. DNA Res. 13, 197–204. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsl012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J. B., Tang, M., Li, H. T., Zhang, Z. R., and Li, D. Z. (2013). Complete chloroplast genome of the genus Cymbidium: lights into the species identification, phylogenetic implications and population genetic analyses. BMC Evol. Biol. 13:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-84

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Z. (2007). PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yi, D. K., Lee, H. L., Sun, B. Y., Chung, M. Y., and Kim, K. J. (2012). The complete chloroplast DNA sequence of Eleutherococcus senticosus (Araliaceae); comparative evolutionary analyses with other three asterids. Mol. Cells 33, 497–508. doi: 10.1007/s10059-012-2281-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Du, L., Liu, A., Chen, J., Wu, L., Hu, W., et al. (2016). The complete chloroplast genome sequences of five Epimedium species: lights into phylogenetic and taxonomic analyses. Front. Plant Sci. 7:306. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00306

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar