Impact Factor 4.106 | CiteScore 4.47
More on impact ›

Editorial ARTICLE

Front. Plant Sci., 12 December 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01839

Editorial: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of the Legume-Rhizobia Symbiosis

  • 1Key Laboratory of Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Ministry of Education, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, Center for Genomics and Biotechnology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
  • 2Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
  • 3Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 4Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay IPS2, CNRS, INRA, Université Paris-Sud, Université Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
  • 5Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay, Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Orsay, France

Legume-rhizobia symbiosis is a remarkable and mutually beneficial association between higher plants and microbes, which is extremely important for sustainable agriculture and ecology. During this association, biological nitrogen fixation occurs in the nodule, which is a specialized accessory legume organ, generally formed on roots. In mature nodules, rhizobia convert inert atmospheric N2 into ammonia (NH3), essential for plant growth. In return, bacteria obtain photosynthetic carbon from the plant. The biologically fixed nitrogen during symbiosis accounts for approximately 65% of nitrogen use in agriculture (Burris and Roberts, 1993).

Due to its agricultural importance and interesting biological features, the legume-rhizobia symbiosis fascinated many researchers in the past decades. It has been discovered that the legume-rhizobia symbiosis is initiated through mutual chemical communication. The plant root releases flavonoids, which induce rhizobia to produce specific lipo-chitooligosaccharides (LCOs), called nodulation factors (Nod factors, or NFs) (Dénarié et al., 1996). These NFs are specifically recognized by the host plant and trigger a sophisticated symbiotic signaling cascade in the host root cells to coordinate rhizobial infection, nodule organogenesis and later on nitrogen fixation (Oldroyd et al., 2011). The main aim of this research topic was to assemble papers addressing and discussing the fundamental science of the molecular mechanisms of legume-rhizobia symbiosis. A total of nine articles were published under this research topic related to rhizobium characters (2), plant response to different type of bacteria (1), phytohormones (3), SYM pathway signals (2), and R genes determining specificity of rhizobia infection (1).

Rhizobia have two lifestyles, a free-living state in soil and a symbiotic state in plant cells when engaged in symbiosis (Gibson et al., 2008). Rhizobia therefore have to adapt to changing conditions outside and inside the host plants. Besides LCOs, a few other bacterial components are important for a successful symbiotic interaction. Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) are major components of the outer membrane of gram negative bacteria including rhizobia and play a central role in rhizobia infection, in adaptation to the host environment, and in facilitating symbiosis (Lerouge and Vanderleyden, 2002; Raetz and Whitfield, 2002). Busset et al. characterized a cluster of five genes presumably involved in LPS biosynthesis and investigated the specific roles of one gene (lpxXL) in Bradyrhizobium free-living and symbiotic states.

Some rhizobia can also use a type 3 secretion system (T3SS) to translocate bacterial effector proteins into host cells to trigger and facilitate symbiosis in certain legume species (Jiménez-Guerrero et al., 2015; Okazaki et al., 2016). Songwattana et al. examined the role of a T3SS present on a Bradyrhizobium symbiotic plasmid. The symbiotic performance of a T3SS mutant Bradyrhizobium strain was tested on 9 different legume species. In addition, the role of the R3SS in Bradyrhizobium endophytic colonization of rice roots was examined. This work confirmed that the T3SS plays significant roles in symbiosis for certain legume species.

Legume plants, when perceiving compatible NFs, respond very rapidly to rhizobial infection at the physiological and molecular levels (Desbrosses and Stougaard, 2011; Oldroyd, 2013). However, how legumes differentiate compatible from incompatible rhizobia or pathogens was not clear. Kelly et al. investigated the transcriptome profiles of Lotus japonicus in response to a spectrum of interacting bacteria, including compatible symbiotic Mesorhizobium loti, semi-compatible symbiotic Sinorhizobium fredii, incompatible symbiotic Bradyrhizobium elkanii, and pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae and Ralstonia solanacearum. This comparative analysis revealed distinct transcriptional responses of the legume plant to different types of bacteria and challenged the concept that an early defense-like response is evoked by compatible rhizobia in L. japonicus during the establishment of symbiosis.

Rhizobial infection and organogenesis events during legume-rhizobia symbiosis are tightly coordinated, and defects in the infection process often result in defective nodule organogenesis. The tight coordination with signaling across root layers strongly suggests the involvement of hormonal pathways. The mini review presented by Buhian and Bensmihen summarized how phytohormones, as key regulators of cellular and developmental plasticity in plants, control the symbiosis process, specifically the early symbiotic events involving NFs. New findings illustrating NF and phytohormone signaling crosstalk in controlling symbiosis establishment were summarized and synergized comprehensively in this mini review.

Cytokinins are essential phytohormones for rhizobia infection and nodule development, particularly for initiation of root cortical cell divisions and induction of critical gene expression in the NF-signaling pathway. To further investigate the role of cytokinin in controlling nodule numbers in soybean. Mens et al. evaluated and characterized the IPT gene family involved in cytokinin biosynthesis in soybean with respect to gene number, sequences, and expression in response to nodulation and soil nitrogen. The results illustrated the exact function of various IPT genes in soybean nodulation and indicated that in general low levels of cytokinins promote nodulation, whereas high levels inhibit it possibly due to toxic effects, and interestingly IPT genes may not play a role in the autoregulation of nodulation pathway.

Two different types of nodules, indeterminate and determinate, are generally formed by legumes. The model legume Medicago truncatula forms indeterminate nodules (typically elongate and maintaining an apical nodule meristem), while L. japonicus forms determinate nodules (typically round with no meristematic activity in mature nodules (Hirsch, 1992). What determines the difference between these two organogenesis programs is largely unknown. The phytohormone auxin is essential for cell divisions in plants and required for both indeterminate or determinate nodule development (Suzaki et al., 2012). Ng and Mathesius carried out a detailed analysis of auxin transport and localization during indeterminate and determinate nodule formation. Their results suggest that auxin response is observed in pericycle, endodermis, and inner cortex cells of the roots of indeterminate nodule-forming species, while increased auxin responses in outer cortex cells likely take place during determinate nodule formation. Specifically, the tissue difference correlates nicely with the fact that the initial cell divisions start in pericycle and endodermis in M. truncatula (indeterminate nodules) while the first cell divisions leading to determinate nodule formation initiate in the outer cortex for plants with determinate nodules.

Research on the legume-rhizobia symbiosis benefits from the advances of technologies at the cellular and molecular levels. Cellular calcium oscillations are critical for signal transduction. The analysis of Ca2+ signaling in different cellular compartments requires tools adapted for monitoring Ca2+ dynamics with high spatial and temporal resolution. Kelner et al. demonstrated the successful application of dual color sensors for simultaneously monitoring calcium signal dynamics in vivo in single root cell compartments during symbiosis, thus providing a powerful tool to study the signal transduction involving Ca2+ signaling.

CCaMK is a calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase localized in the nucleus and plays a critical role downstream of symbiotic calcium spiking. Activated by Ca2+ and Ca2+-loaded calmodulin, CCaMK phosphorylates CYCLOPS or IPD3 in M. truncatula (Yano et al., 2008). Jauregui et al. demonstrated that mutations in the calmodulin-binding domain of CCaMK alter its calmodulin binding capacity, generating a constitutively activated kinase that confers an altered nodulation phenotype.

Particular rhizobial species or strains normally nodulate only a narrow group of legume species or genotypes (Wang et al., 2012, 2017). Understanding the genetic and molecular basis of this symbiotic specificity is important for developing strategies to improve symbiosis. Through genetic mapping Fan et al. identified a dominant gene in soybeans that restricts nodulation with S. fredii USDA193. Further validation indicated that an Rfg1 allele encoding a member of the Toll-interleukin receptor/nucleotide-binding site/leucine-rich repeat class of plant resistance proteins restricts nodulation by S. fredii strains USDA257 and USDA205. In combination with several previous studies, they showed that the Rfg1 allele likely provided broad-spectrum resistance to nodulation by many S. fredii and B. japonicum strains in soybean.

Author Contributions

JW prepared the first draft of the manuscript. SA and PR revised the draft critically and constructively. All authors reviewed and approved the final draft.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Burris, R. H., and Roberts, G. (1993). Biological nitrogen fixation. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 13, 317–335. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.13.070193.001533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dénarié, J., Debellé, F., and Promé, J. C. (1996). Rhizobium lipo-chitooligosaccharide nodulation factors: signaling molecules mediating recognition and morphogenesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 503–535.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Desbrosses, G. J., and Stougaard, J. (2011). Root nodulation: a paradigm for how plant-microbe symbiosis influences host developmental pathways. Cell Host Microbe 10, 348–358. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gibson, K. E., Kobayashi, H., and Walker, G. C. (2008). Molecular determinants of a symbiotic chronic infection. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 413–441. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091427

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirsch, A. M. (1992). Developmental biology of legume nodulation. New Phytol. 122, 211–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb04227.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiménez-Guerrero, I., Pérez-Montaño, F., Monreal, J. A., Preston, G. M., Fones, H., Vioque, B., et al. (2015). The Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii HH103 Type 3 secretion system suppresses early defense responses to effectively nodulate soybean. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 28, 790–799. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-15-0020-R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lerouge, I., and Vanderleyden, J. (2002). O-antigen structural variation: mechanisms and possible roles in animal/plant-microbe interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26, 17–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00597.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okazaki, S., Tittabutr, P., Teulet, A., Thouin, J., Fardoux, J., Chaintreuil, C., et al. (2016). Rhizobium-legume symbiosis in the absence of Nod factors: two possible scenarios with or without the T3SS. ISME J. 1, 64–74. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.103

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oldroyd, G. E. (2013). Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 252–263. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2990

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oldroyd, G. E., Murray, J. D., Poole, P. S., and Downie, J. A. (2011). The rules of engagement in the legume-rhizobial symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 119–144. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132549

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raetz, C. R., and Whitfield, C. (2002). Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 635–700. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135414

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suzaki, T., Yano, K., Ito, M., Umehara, Y., Suganuma, N., and Kawaguchi, M. (2012). Positive and negative regulation of cortical cell division during root nodule development in Lotus japonicus is accompanied by auxin response. Development 139, 3997–4006. doi: 10.1242/dev.084079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, D., Yang, S., Tang, F., and Zhu, H. (2012). Symbiosis specificity in the legume-rhizobial mutualism. Cell Microbiol. 14, 334–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01736.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Q., Yang, S., Liu, J., Terecskei, K., Ábrahám, E., Gombár, A., et al. (2017). Host-secreted antimicrobial peptide enforces symbiotic selectivity in Medicago truncatula. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 6854–6859. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700715114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yano, K., Yoshida, S., Müller, J., Singh, S., Banba, M., Vickers, K., et al. (2008). CYCLOPS, a mediator of symbiotic intracellular accommodation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 20540–20545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806858105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: legume, rhizobium, nodule, symbiosis, SYM pathway, biological nitrogen fixation

Citation: Wang J, Andersen SU and Ratet P (2018) Editorial: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of the Legume-Rhizobia Symbiosis. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1839. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01839

Received: 14 September 2018; Accepted: 27 November 2018;
Published: 12 December 2018.

Edited by:

Andrea Genre, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy

Reviewed by:

Beatrice Lace, University of Freiburg, Germany
Joëlle Fournier, UMR2594 Plant Interactions Laboratory Microorganisms (LIPM), France

Copyright © 2018 Wang, Andersen and Ratet. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jianping Wang, wangjp@ufl.edu