Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 16 April 2019
Sec. Plant Breeding

Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Novel Genomic Regions Associated With High Grain Protein Content in Wheat Lines Derived From Wild Emmer Wheat

\r\nJia Liu,&#x;Jia Liu1,2†Lin Huang,&#x;Lin Huang1,2†Changquan WangChangquan Wang3Yaxi Liu,Yaxi Liu1,2Zehong Yan,Zehong Yan1,2Zhenzhen WangZhenzhen Wang1Lan XiangLan Xiang1Xiaoying ZhongXiaoying Zhong1Fangyi GongFangyi Gong1Youliang Zheng,Youliang Zheng1,2Dengcai Liu,Dengcai Liu1,2Bihua Wu,*Bihua Wu1,2*
  • 1Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources and Improvement, Ministry of Education, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
  • 3College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

Grain protein content (GPC) and yield are of two important traits in wheat, but their negative correlation has hampered their simultaneous improvement in conventional breeding. Wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides) is an important genetic resource for wheat quality improvement. In this study, we report a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using 13116 DArT-seq markers to characterize GPC in 161 wheat lines derived from wild emmer. Using a general linear model, we identified 141 markers that were significantly associated with GPC, and grouped into 48 QTL regions. Using both general linear model and mixed linear model, we identified four significant markers that were grouped into two novel QTL regions on chromosomes 2BS (QGpc.cd1-2B.1) and 7BL (QGpc.cd1-7B.2). The two QTLs have no negative effects on thousand kernel weight (TKW) and should be useful for simultaneous improvement of GPC and TKW in wheat breeding. Searches of public databases revealed 61 putative candidate/flanking genes related to GPC. The putative proteins of interest were grouped in four main categories: enzymes, kinase proteins, metal transport-related proteins, and disease resistance proteins. The linked markers and associated candidate genes provide essential information for cloning genes related to high GPC and performing marker-assisted breeding in wheat.

Introduction

Wheat provides approximately 20% of calories and 25% of proteins in the human diet. The nutritional quality of wheat grains has a significant impact on human health and well-being. The grain protein content (GPC) is an important trait for both nutritional value and end-use quality of wheat (Veraverbeke and Delcour, 2002). While the protein and micronutrients levels in modern wheat grains are inherently low and therefore, breeding for improvements in the nutritional quality of wheat, such as increased protein and micronutrient levels in the grain are possible and have the potential to alleviate hunger and nutrient deficiencies.

Breeding wheat varieties with high in both GPC and grain yield is desirable (Zhao et al., 2009). However, the GPC was negative correlated with grain yield, where phenotypic correlations for these two traits usually range between −0.30 and −0.60 (Klindworth et al., 2009). This characteristic has hampered the simultaneous improvement of these two traits in the conventional wheat breeding. The transfer of alien genes from wheat related species has become an effective approach in the development of new wheat varieties for high GPC or yield.

Wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides, 2n = 4x = AABB) is the tetraploid progenitor of cultivated wheat, offering wide genotypic variations relevant for improvement of various agronomic traits in wheat (Cakmak et al., 2004; Peleg et al., 2008b; Gomez-Becerra et al., 2010), such as GPC (e.g., Uauy et al., 2006a; Wang et al., 2018), disease resistance (Hua et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009), and drought resistance (Peleg et al., 2005, 2008a). The introgression is feasible due to the occurrence of homologous recombination between the A and B genomes of wild emmer and modern wheat.

Dissection of the genetic control of GPC in wild emmer wheat was conducted using tetraploid wheat mapping population, derived from a cross between durum wheat (cv. Langdon) and wild emmer accessions (G18-16 or FA-15-3) (Joppa et al., 1997; Gonzalez-Hernandez et al., 2004; Peleg et al., 2009). Although several quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting GPC were reported from these two accessions, the introgression and characterization of wild emmer GPC-QTL in a hexaploid wheat background have been less reported. The most important wild emmer GPC-QTL is the Gpc-B1 on chromosome 6BS. This gene encodes a NAC-domain transcription factor that accelerates senescence and increases nutrient remobilization from leaves to developing grains (Uauy et al., 2006b). The introgression of Gpc-B1 in breeding programs has shown significant improvement in GPC (Kumar et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2015; Vishwakarma et al., 2016). However, the presence of Gpc-B1 was associated with reductions in grain weight and yield in some wheat varieties and environments (Uauy et al., 2006a; Brevis and Dubcovsky, 2010; Tabbita et al., 2013). Therefore, the exploring of QTLs for GPC with less negative effect on yield-related traits is required.

In recent years, genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) has been extensively used to decipher the genetic bases of complex traits in crops (Su et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Ates et al., 2018). Advantages of GWAS over traditional QTL mapping include high resolution mapping, cost and time efficiency, and the potential to utilize large sets of germplasm resources such as landraces, elite cultivars, and advanced breeding lines. Besides, GWAS was available to analysis traits in multi-parent populations consisted of backbone parent and its derived lines in Yu and Tian (2012); Yu et al. (2014); Xiao et al. (2016). In wheat, this approach has been widely used to identify loci controlling disease resistance (Joukhadar et al., 2013; Kollers et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017a), yield-related traits (Breseghello and Sorrells, 2006; Tadesse et al., 2015), end-use quality traits (Battenfield et al., 2016), root traits (Beyer et al., 2018), and grain zinc concentration (Velu et al., 2018).

In our previous work, the agronomically stable advanced wheat lines were obtained from common wheat cultivar Chuannong 16 (CN16 hereafter) as female crossed with wild emmer accession D1 as male through successive selfing. We found that majority of the tested wheat lines showed higher chlorophyll contents and lower chlorophyll degradation rates in flag leaves than the controls (Liu et al., 2016). Several wheat lines without Gpc-B1 gene showed thousand-kernel weight (TKW) and GPC simultaneous improvement (Wang, 2015), implying the presence of novel loci conferring high GPC and TKW.

In the current study, GWAS was used to study genetic basis of GPC in a multi-parent population which consisted of wild emmer as backbone parent and its derived wheat lines. The objectives of this study were to characterize the wild emmer GPC loci that associated with no reductions in TKW in a hexaploid wheat population, and to scan associated candidate genes using recently published wheat reference sequences (Avni et al., 2017; Appels et al., 2018). The identified genes and markers will provide important information for cloning GPC-related genes and be useful in marker-assisted breeding for enhanced GPC in wheat.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

The low-gluten wheat cultivar CN16 (T. aestivum, AABBDD, 2n = 6x = 42) was crossed as the female parent with a high-protein-content wild emmer accession D1 (originating from Israel) as the male parent. The resulting pentaploid F1 hybrid was advanced to F12 to generate 106 first recombinant inbred lines (RILs) include 106 individuals with a number of stable 42 chromosomes. Some RILs with high GPC were selected and crossed to each of low/medium-gluten common wheat varieties Mianmai 46 (MM46), Chuanmai 50 (CM50), Kechengmai 2 (KCM2), and Chuanyu 18 (CY18)/YunB 58863 (YB58863) and eight generations of self-fertilization to create a second RILs with 55 individuals (Supplementary Table S1). A total of 161 wheat lines were used in this study. All of the materials were maintained at the Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, China. Wheat plants were grown in a randomized complete block design with three replicates over two growing seasons (2015 and 2016) at Chongzhou (2015CZ and 2016CZ) and one growing season (2015) at Wenjiang (2015WJ). Individual plants were spaced 10 cm apart within a 2 m row, with 30 cm between rows. Each replicate contained twenty individuals in a 2 m row. Mature seeds were harvested from the middle six plants of each row and used for GPC and TKW measurement.

Determination of Grain Protein Content and Thousand Kernel Weight

Wheat seeds were dried to constant weight and ground to a fine powder with a Chopin CD1 AUTO (Renault, Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (Jirsa et al., 2008). A 0.5 g powder samples were measured for GPC by1241 Grain Analyzer (FOSS A/S, Hillerød, Denmark) following the method as described by Pettersson and Eckersten (2007). TKW was evaluated with an electronic balance by weighing three samples of 300 kernels (GB T 5519-2008, 2008). Analyses of variance (ANOVA) and pearson correlation coefficients for measured traits were performed using the SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).

Genotyping and Linkage Disequilibrium and Population Structure Analysis

The genomic DNA was extracted using CTAB method (Murray and Thompson, 1980). All of the tested materials were genotyped using the DArT (Diversity Arrays Technology, Canberra, ACT, Australia1). The obtained DArT markers data were filtered based on call rate (minimum threshold value of 85%) and reproducibility (minimum threshold value of 95%). A total of 24022 DArT markers were recalled from marker data. For the further analysis, markers with missing data greater than 10% and minor allele frequency (MAF) less than 5% were filtered, which resulted in 13116 DArT markers were retained and used. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis was performed for each of the 21 wheat chromosomes associated with mapped DArT markers using software TASSEL 3.0 (Bradbury et al., 2007). The LD squared allele-frequency correlation (r2), which contains both mutational and recombination history information, was evaluated for syntenic loci (p < 0.001). The mean r2 over different genetic distances was calculated for the A, B, and D subgenomes as well as the whole genome. The LD decay plots were generated using r2 and the genetic map distance between markers.

Population structure was estimated using Structure software 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al., 2000). An admixture model with ten replicates for each number of genetic groups (K = 1–10) and 100,000 iterations of burn-in followed by 100,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations were used. The outputs of the genetic group analysis were extracted in Structure Harvester (Earl and von Holdt, 2012). The optimal K-value was determined using the delta K method as described by Evanno et al. (2005). Furthermore, principal component analysis (PCA) of filtered markers was performed with the TASSEL 3.0 (Bradbury et al., 2007) and the first two PCA values were plotted.

Genome-Wide Association Study for GPC

To eliminate the environmental impact, the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) across all tested environments was carried out using the META-R (Alvarado et al., 2015). The association analysis of DArT markers and GPC was performed using a general linear model (GLM) and mixed linear model (MLM) in TASSEL. The first three PCA values were used as covariate in the model to adjust population stratification and kinship matrix (K) was calculated using Scaled IBS method (Yu et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2018). A Bonferroni-corrected p value threshold at α = 1 was used as the cutoff (Yang et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017b). For the 13116 DArT markers, the p-value threshold at α = 1 was 7.62 × 10−5, with a corresponding −log10p value of 4.12. Significant markers were visualized with a Manhattan plot using Haploview 4.2 software (Barrett et al., 2004). Important p-value distributions (expected vs. observed p-values on a −log10 scale) were shown with a quantile-quantile plot. To identify the candidate genes linked to significant markers, we performed a BLAST search against the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium database (IWGSC2) and the International Wild Emmer Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium database3 using the significant marker sequences. When a DArT marker sequence and a wheat contig were 100% identical, the sequence was extended to 5 kb for each marker using the IWGSC BLAST results (Liu et al., 2017b). The extended sequence was explored to predict flanking genes using BLAST search against the Triticeae Multi-omics center database4.

Results

Variation for GPC in the Wheat Lines Derived From Wild Emmer

The variation for GPC in the wheat lines and their core parents were summarized in Table 1. Most genotypes displayed relatively stable GPC across the three environments (2015WJ, 2015CZ, and 2016CZ) (Figure 1). The GPC was highly correlated (p < 0.01) across environments (r = 0.210–0.732) based on the two-tailed pearson product-moment correlation coefficient test (Fieller et al., 1957; Table 2). The male parent D1 exhibited significantly higher GPC (mean range 22.45–23.43%) compared to female parent CN16 (mean range 12.00–12.90%) across all test environments (Table 1). The GPC of the wheat lines derived from wild emmer were ranged from 11.97 to 19.73% (mean range 14.47–14.70%) across three environments. The lowest mean GPC (11.97%) was recorded in 2015 at Chongzhou, whereas the highest mean GPC (19.73%) was recorded in 2015 at Wenjiang. Most of the wheat lines showed significantly higher GPC than CN16 (Table 1 and Figure 2). A large number of wheat lines had GPC ranged from 14 to 15% in each environment (Figures 2A–C). A total of 92 (59%) wheat lines displayed consistently high GPC (≥14%) across three tested environments (Figure 2D). The mean TKW of wheat lines were higher than that of female parent CN16 under 2015WJ, 2015CZ, and 2016CZ environments (Table 1). Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that there was no significant negative correlation between GPC and TKW across environments (Table 2). Therefore, according to the phenotypic BLUP data of GPC and TKW, a total of 132 wheat lines with strong gluten (GPC ≥14%) and high TKW (≥46.24 g) were identified (Supplementary Figure S1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. GPC analysis of the wheat lines derived from wild emmer grown at 2015WJ, 2015CZ, and 2016WJ.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Frequency distributions of GPC values under three environments in the wheat lines derived from wild emmer. (A), 2015WJ; (B), 2015CZ; (C), 2016CZ; (D) Wayne chart: the number of wheat lines with GPC ≥14% in tested environments (Blue color, 2015WJ; Yellow color, 2015CZ; Green color, 2016CZ).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The variation for GPC and TKW in wheat lines derived from wild emmer under three environments.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficient of GPC and TKW among all measured environments in the wheat lines derived from wild emmer.

Analysis of DArT Markers, Population Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium (LD)

A total of 13116 polymorphic DArT markers (MAF≥5% and missing ≤10%) were used to estimate the underlying population structure. Of these, 4710, 6718, and 1688 markers were mapped on the A, B, and D genomes, respectively. The total map length was 5941.15 cM, and the average distance between markers for the A, B, and D genomes was 0.44 cM, 0.30 cM, and 1.11 cM, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). Chromosome 1B contained the largest number of markers (1708) and the average distance between markers was 0.33 cM, whereas Chromosome 4D contained the smallest number of markers (52) and the average distance between markers was 3.47 cM.

Base on structure analysis, the highest delta K-value was 3, the 163 genotypes were divided into three main sub-groups, namely Gp1, Gp2, and Gp3, representing 41, 75, and 47 genotypes, respectively. Gp1 only included individuals from the 106 RILs; Gp2 included individuals from both RIL populations; the two core parents and most of the individuals from the 55 RILs were belonged to Gp3 (Supplementary Figure S2A and Supplementary Table S1). PCA was also performed to investigate population structure. The first two PCs explained 12.64 and 7.54% variation in the population of wheat lines (Supplementary Figure S2B). The PCA results were basically agreed with that of structure analysis, which clearly divided the genotypes into three main sub-groups.

LD between pairs of markers was estimated for each of the 21 chromosomes (Supplementary Table S3). In the whole genome, 55.55% of pairwise DArT markers had a significant LD (p < 0.001), and 37.37% of significant pairwise markers had an r2 > 0.2. In the A, B, and D subgenomes, 51.12, 62.58, and 39.71% of pairwise DArT markers had a significant LD (p < 0.001), and 32.06, 43.90, and 25.98% of the significant pairwise markers had an r2 > 0.2, respectively. The extent of LD in each chromosome was different. Chromosome 1B showed the highest percentage of pairwise markers with significant LDs (75.64%), with r2 > 0.2 (62.14% of significant pairwise markers). In contrast, chromosome 4D had the lowest percentage of pairwise markers with significant LDs (17.58%), with r2 > 0.2 (7.35% of significant pairwise markers). The mean r2-values for the A, B, and D genomes as well as the whole genome were rapidly decreased with increasing pairwise distance (Supplementary Figure S3). The LD decay distances were approximately 9, 12, 13, and 12 cM for the A, B, and D genomes as well as the whole genome, respectively (Supplementary Figure S3).

GWAS for GPC in the Wheat Lines Derived From Wild Emmer

A total of 141 markers had significant results in the three environments by GLM with PVEs ranged from 9.90 to 22.79% (Supplementary Table S4). These markers were distributed on all wheat chromosomes except chromosomes 1A, 1B, 4A, and 7A (Figure 3A). In the MLM, four significant markers (three on 2B and one on 7B) were detected with PVEs of 11.92–12.93%, and these markers were also detected by GLM (Figure 3B and Tables 3, 4). To determine the confidence interval for the potential QTL identified in this study, markers significantly associated to the GPC that were co-locating together and/or adjacent within intervals inferior to the LD decay distance of ± 5 cM from the association peak were considered as a same QTL region. In total, the 141 significant markers detected were grouped into 48 loci (Supplementary Table S4). Of these, four significant markers by both models were grouped into two loci on chromosomes 2B (QGpc.cd1-2B.1) and 7B (QGpc.cd1-7B.2) (Table 3 and Figure 3B) that potentially contain GPC genes. In particular, the mean PVE of three markers on chromosome 2B in these two stable major loci was 12.78 and 20.49% in MLM and GLM, and the PVE value of marker 1166404 located on chromosome 7B was the highest at 22.79% in GLM. Quantile-quantile plots of p-values comparing the uniform distribution of the expected −log10p value to the observed −log10p value for GPC showed that the MLM was more conservative than GLM (Figure 3C).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Manhattan plots of genome-wide association scan for GPC in three environments. Manhattan plot showing –log10 p values of the markers for GPC. Red lines indicate the −log10 p threshold of 4.12. Chromosomes carrying significant markers detected by GLM (A) and MLM (B); (C), Quantile-quantile plots of GPC. Green plot, GLM model; Red plot, MLM model; Black line, the expected values.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Significant DArT markers for GPC identified by MLM and GLM.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. MTAs identified by GWAS base on the BLUP data.

Candidate Genes That May Be Associated With GPC

Sequences of DArT markers related with GPC were utilized to predicate candidate genes using the recently annotated wheat reference sequence (RefSeq v.1.0) and wild emmer wheat reference sequence (WEWSeq v.1.0). The enzymes and proteins related to 61 putative candidate genes were predicated (Supplementary Table S5). These candidate genes could be roughly divided into four groups according to the types of protein they encoded. The first group of candidate genes included enzymes associated with nitrogen transport, such as aspartic peptidase, peroxidase, and peptidase. The second group consisted of genes including kinase proteins. The third group included metal transport related proteins, such as zinc transporter, and heavy metal transport proteins. The last group consisted of disease resistance proteins, such as MYB transcription factor and NAC domain-containing proteins (Supplementary Table S5).

Discussion

Wild emmer wheat has been found to show higher concentration of protein in grain when compared to common cultivated wheat (Cakmak et al., 2004). Several QTL analyses were employed to dissect the genetic basis of grain protein using a tetraploid wheat RIL population (Joppa et al., 1997; Gonzalez-Hernandez et al., 2004; Peleg et al., 2009). In this study, the 161 RILs derived from wild emmer were phenotyped in multiple environments and genotyped using the DArT markers to dissect the genetic basis of grain protein accumulation in hexaploid wheat. GWAS identified 141 significant markers for GPC by GLM, and 61 associated candidate genes were predicated using the sequences annotation (RefSeq v.1.0; WEWSeq v.1.0). Two large effect QTL regions on chromosomes 2B and 7B were detected by both GLM and MLM. Our findings are consistent with previous studies that the group 2 and 7 chromosomes harboring genes for nutritional quality traits in wheat (Crespo-Herrera et al., 2017; Velu et al., 2018).

Peleg et al. (2009) identified ten GPC-QTLs related to GPC using a mapping population derived from LDN crossed with wild emmer G18-16 that showed high GPC phenotype; these loci were distributed on 10 wild emmer chromosomes except 1A, 1B, 3A, and 4B; A few genomic regions (2A, 5A, 6B, and 7A) were found to contain clusters of QTLs for GPC. In the current study, 48 significant GPC-QTLs were scattered across all wheat chromosomes (except 1A, 1B, 4A, and 7A) using a GLM model. We found the GPC-QTLs on chromosomes 2A, 3B, and 6A are located in the same region as compared to Peleg et al. (2009) and the remaining QTLs in our studies were novel. However, GPC-QTLs on chromosomes 4A and 7A in the G18-16 tetraploid mapping population were not detected in our hexaploid RILs.

Candidate genes prediction revealed that some QTL were related to nitrogen metabolism and disease resistance. For example, QTLs on chromosome 5B were associated with glutathione S-transferase (GST) and proline transporter. Previous research showed that GSTs are critical for nitrogen fixation in plant (Dalton et al., 2009). In particular, the marker 1064158 (55.28 cM) located on chromosome 5B was consistent with the results reported by previous study (Kumar et al., 2018b). QGpc.cd1-2A.2 and QGpc.cd1-5A were associated with methyltransferase, cytochrome P450 and NAC domain-containing protein. QGpc.cd1-6A.1 were associated with nitrogenase-stabilizing. Kim et al. (2005) reported that the function of nitrogenase (NA) is closely related to plant nitrogen metabolism, and nitrogenase activity has a positive effect on wheat growth, total plant N-yield, and protein content. Moreover, although QGpc.cd1-1D.1 was only detected under one model, it showed a very high PVE value 19.06% and was associated with disease resistance protein. Note worthily, we detected two QTLs QGpc.cd1-6B.2 and QGpc.cd1-6B.3 on 6BS that associated with zinc transporter and glutenin macropolymer (GMP) synthase. In barley, the zinc transporter (for example HvMTP1) was associated with enhancement of grain Zn content (Menguer et al., 2018). The glutenin macropolymer (GMP) content of flour was confirmed to be significant related to high protein content (Weegels et al., 1996). Uauy et al. (2006b) reported the Gpc-B1 on 6BS that was associated with N, Zn, and Fe remobilization in plants. However, this locus was not detected in the current study and the physical position of the two QTLs on 6BS was larger than 10 Mb away from the functional Gpc-B1. Different hypotheses may explain this observation: (1) the relatively low density of DArT markers; (2) the low frequency of Gpc-B1 in the current wheat lines that cannot detected by GWAS. Additional studies are required to test these hypotheses.

Using a MLM model, we identified two significant stable GPC-QTLs QGpc.cd1-2B.1 (3.93–8.70 cM) and QGpc.cd1-7B.2 (216.46 cM), explaining 11.92–12.93 and 19.93–22.79% of the phenotypic variance. A GPC-QTL (95.4 ± 13.8 cM) on wild emmer chromosome 2B was detected by Peleg et al. (2009). In durum wheat, Suprayogi et al. (2009) identified a QTL on 2B which was associated with higher GPC in all tested environments. Recently, two environmental stable GPC-QTLs QGpc.mna-2B (Tsilo et al., 2010) and QGpc.2B-yume (Terasawa et al., 2016) were reported in wheat. QGpc.mna-2B was located between the markers Xwmc245-Xgwm271 at position 64.0–65.0 cM on chromosome 2B; whereas QGpc.2B-yume was sited near the marker Xgpw4382 at position 67.1 cM. The position of QGpc.cd1-2B.1 (3.93–8.70 cM) in our study is different to the previous reported GPC-QTLs on chromosome 2B. On chromosome 7B, at least five GPC-QTLs with stable effects across environments have been reported in different studies (reviewed by Kumar et al., 2018a). Of these, most GPC-QTLs were located on the short arm of chromosome 7B. Blanco et al. (2006) reported a QTL located on 7BL explained 9.1% of the phenotypic variance of the GPC which close to the SSR marker Xgwm577 at position 137 cM. QGpc.cd1-7B.2 in our study is located at position 216.46 cM on the long arm of chromosome 7B. Therefore, we concluded that the two wild emmer QTLs on 2B and 7B conferring high GPC were novel.

In this study, the highly associated markers sequences were used to predicate putative candidate genes for QGpc.cd1-2B.1 and QGpc.cd1-7B.2. We found that the ABA-responsive binding factor and processing peptidase genes may play crucial roles in conferring of higher protein content in wheat grain. For example, the ABA-dependent NAC transcription factor (OsNAC5) in rice was reported to be associated with Fe, Zn and amino acids remobilization from green tissues to seeds (Sperotto et al., 2009). In addition, the QGpc.cd1-7B.2 was associated with processing peptidase. Peptidases are key enzymes that involved in nitrogen metabolism, such as nitrate reductase, endopeptidase, aminopeptidase, and carboxypeptidase. It was known that leaf senescence and nitrogen metabolism of senescing tissues are two important factors that determining the GPC in cereals (Jukanti and Fischer, 2008). Moreover, the peptidase plays a role in regulating the redistribution and utilization of nitrogen in wheat plants that affects the grain protein quality of wheat (Waters et al., 1980). Functional analyses are needed to further understand the pathways of these candidate genes for regulating high GPC in wheat.

The wheat grain yield and GPC are negatively correlated and the negative correlation was mainly due to the dilution effect that making the simultaneous increase of the two traits challenging (Cox et al., 1985; Day et al., 1985; Simmonds, 1995). In our previous studies, we confirmed that the introgression of high GPC and TKW traits from wild emmer wheat to common wheat is feasible by wide hybridization (Wu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2018). The TKW was positively correlated with grain yield as reported by previous studies (Bhatta et al., 2018a,b). In the present study, no significant negative correlation between GPC and TKW were detected in the wheat lines derived from wild emmer, suggesting presence of novel GPC-QTLs that are not associated or less associated with TKW. Our results indicate the improvement of GPC without sacrificing yield could be possible by dissection and introgression of wild emmer QTLs. In addition, our study indicates the potential value of QGpc.cd1-2B.1 and QGpc.cd1-7B.2 for GPC improvement and provides comprehensive use of wild emmer wheat for offering new source of alleles to increase GPC in wheat.

Conclusion

Wild emmer is a valuable resource for wheat quality improvement. The wild emmer derived wheat population showed high GPC and a weak correlation between GPC and TKW, indicating simultaneous improvement of GPC and TKW could be possible. A GWAS identified 48 QTLs (141 MTAs), of which two novel major QTL regions (chromosomes 2B and 7B) for high GPC were stable detected in two models. The QTLs have no negative effects on TKW and would facilitate the development of cultivars with both high GPC and TKW. Furthermore, at significant loci and flanking regions, we identified 61 putative candidate genes that might play crucial roles in conferring of higher protein content in wheat grain. The identified markers and genes offer information for cloning genes related to GPC and may be used in wheat breeding programs.

Author Contributions

BW, JL, and LH designed the study. JL, ZW, LX, XZ, and FG carried out experiments. JL analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. CW, YL, and ZY provided the genotyping data. YZ and DL provided their constructive comments and suggestions. LH, BW, DL, and YZ revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31571668), the National Key Research, and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFD0100900).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00464/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

  1. ^ http://www.DiversityArrays.com/
  2. ^ http://www.wheatgenome.org/
  3. ^ http://wewseq.wixsite.com/consortium
  4. ^ http://202.194.139.32/

References

Alvarado, G., López, M., Vargas, M., Pacheco,Á., Rodríguez, F., Burgueño, J., et al. (2015). META-R (Multi Environment Trail Analysis with R for Windows) Version 5.0. Texcoco: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.

Google Scholar

Appels, R., Eversole, K., Feuillet, C., Keller, B., Rogers, J., Stein, N., et al. (2018). Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 361:eaar7191. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ates, D., Asciogul, T. K., Nemli, S., Erdogmus, S., Esiyok, D., and Tanyolac, M. B. (2018). Association mapping of days to flowering in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) revealed by DArT markers. Mol. Breed. 38:113. doi: 10.1007/s11032-018-0868-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Avni, R., Nave, M., Barad, O., Baruch, K., Twardziok, S. O., Gundlach, H., et al. (2017). Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science 357, 93–97. doi: 10.1126/science.aan0032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrett, J. C., Fry, B., Maller, J., and Daly, M. J. (2004). Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21, 263–265. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Battenfield, S. D., Guzmán, C., Gaynor, R. C., Singh, R. P., Peña, R. J., Dreisigacker, S., et al. (2016). Genomic selection for processing and end-use quality traits in the CIMMYT spring bread wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 9, 1–12. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2016.01.0005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beyer, S., Daba, S., Tyagi, P., Bockelman, H., Brown-Guedira, G., and Mohammadi, M. (2018). Loci and candidate genes controlling root traits in wheat seedlings-a wheat root GWAS. Funct. Integr. Genomics 19, 91–107. doi: 10.1007/s10142-018-0630-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhatta, M., Baenziger, P., Waters, B., Poudel, R., Belamkar, V., Poland, J., et al. (2018a). Genome-wide association study reveals novel genomic regions associated with 10 grain minerals in synthetic hexaploid wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:E3237. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhatta, M., Morgounov, A., Belamkar, V., and Baenziger, P. (2018b). Genome-wide association study reveals novel genomic regions for grain yield and yield-related traits in drought-stressed synthetic hexaploid wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:E3011. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blanco, A., Simeone, R., and Gadaleta, A. (2006). Detection of QTLs for grain protein content in durum wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112, 1195–1204. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0221-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bradbury, P. J., Zhang, Z., Kroon, D. E., Casstevens, T. M., Ramdoss, Y., and Buckler, E. S. (2007). TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23, 2633–2635. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Breseghello, F., and Sorrells, M. E. (2006). Association mapping of kernal size and milling quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Genetics 172, 1165–1177. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.044586

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brevis, J. C., and Dubcovsky, J. (2010). Effects of the chromosome region including the Gpc-B1 locus on wheat grain and protein yield. Crop Sci. 50, 93–104. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2009.02.0057

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cakmak, I., Torun, A., Millet, E., Feldman, M., Fahima, T., Korol, A., et al. (2004). Triticum dicoccoides: an important genetic resource for increasing zinc and iron concentration in modern cultivated wheat. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 50, 1047–1054. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408573

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cox, M. C., Qualset, C. O., and Rains, D. W. (1985). Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat. II. Nitrogen assimilation in relation to grain yield and protein. Crop Sci. 25, 430–435. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500030003x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crespo-Herrera, L. A., Govindan, V., Stangoulis, J., Hao, Y., and Singh, R. P. (2017). QTL mapping of grain Zn and Fe concentrations in two hexaploid wheat RIL populations with ample transgressive segregation. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1800. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01800

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dalton, D. A., Boniface, C., Turner, Z., Lindahl, A., Kim, H. J., Jelinek, L., et al. (2009). Physiological roles of glutathione S-transferases in soybean root nodules. Plant Physiol. 150, 521–530. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.136630

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Day, G. E., Paulsen, G. N., and Sears, R. G. (1985). Nitrogen relations in winter wheat cultivars differing in grain protein percentage and stature. J. Plant Nutr. 8, 555–566. doi: 10.1080/01904168509363368

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Earl, D. A., and von Holdt, B. M. (2012). STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 359–361. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Evanno, G., Regnaut, S., and Goudet, J. (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fieller, E. C., Hartley, H. O., and Pearson, E. S. (1957). Tests for rank correlation coefficients. I. Biometrika 44, 470–481. doi: 10.2307/2332878

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

GB T 5519-2008 (2008). Cereals and Pulses-Determination of the Mas of 1000 Grains. Beijing: Standards Press of China.

Google Scholar

Gomez-Becerra, H. F., Yazici, A., Ozturk, L., Budak, H., Peleg, Z., Morgounov, A., et al. (2010). Genetic variation and environmental stability of grain mineral nutrient concentrations in Triticum dicoccoides under five environments. Euphytica 171, 39–52. doi: 10.1007/s10681-009-9987-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Hernandez, J. L., Elias, E. M., and Kianian, S. F. (2004). Mapping genes for grain protein concentration and grain yield on chromosome 5B of Triticum turgidum (L.) var. dicoccoides. Euphytica 139, 217–225. doi: 10.1007/s10681-004-3157-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hua, W., Liu, Z. J., Zhu, J., Xie, C. J., Yang, T., Zhou, Y. L., et al. (2009). Identification and genetic mapping of pm42, a new recessive wheat powdery mildew resistance gene derived from wild emmer (Triticum turgidum var. dicoccoides). Theor. Appl. Genet. 119, 223–230. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1031-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jirsa, O., Hrušková, M., and Švec, I. (2008). Near-infrared prediction of milling and baking parameters of wheat varieties. J. Food Eng. 87, 21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.09.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joppa, L. R., Du, C., Hart, G. E., and Hareland, G. A. (1997). Mapping gene(s) for grain protein in tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) using a population of recombinant inbred chromosome lines. Crop Sci. 37, 1586–1589. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700050030x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joukhadar, R., El-Bouhssini, M., Jighly, A., and Ogbonnaya, F. C. (2013). Genome-wide association mapping for five major pest resistances in wheat. Mol. Breed. 32, 943–960. doi: 10.1007/s11032-013-9924-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jukanti, A. K., and Fischer, A. M. (2008). A high-grain protein content locus on barley (Hordeum vulgare) chromosome 6 is associated with increased flag leaf proteolysis and nitrogen remobilization. Physiol. Plant. 132, 426–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01044.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, C., Kecskés, M. L., Deaker, R. J., Gilchrist, K., New, P. B., Kennedy, I. R., et al. (2005). Wheat root colonization and nitrogenase activity by Azospirillum isolates from crop plants in Korea. Can. J. Microbiol. 51, 948–956. doi: 10.1139/w05-052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klindworth, D. L., Hareland, G. A., Elias, E. M., Faris, J. D., Chao, S., and Xu, S. S. (2009). Agronomic and quality characteristics of two new sets of Langdon durum-wild emmer wheat chromosome substitution lines. J. Cereal Sci. 50, 29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.02.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kollers, S., Rodemann, B., Ling, J., Korzun, V., Ebmeyer, E., Argillier, O., et al. (2014). Genome-wide association mapping of tan spot resistance (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) in European winter wheat. Mol. Breed. 34, 363–371. doi: 10.1007/s11032-014-0039-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, A., Jain, S., Elias, E. M., Ibrahim, M., and Sharma, L. K. (2018a). “An overview of QTL identification and marker-assisted selection for grain protein content in wheat,” in Eco-Friendly Agro-Biological Techniques for Enhancing Crop Productivity, eds R. Sengar and A. Singh (Singapore: Springer), 245–274. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6934-5_11

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, J., Saripalli, G., Gahlaut, V., Goel, N., Meher, P. K., Mishra, K. K., et al. (2018b). Genetics of Fe, Zn, β-carotene, GPC and yield traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using multi-locus and multi-traits GWAS. Euphytica 214:219. doi: 10.1007/s10681-018-2284-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, J., Jaiswal, V., Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Mir, R. R., Kumar, S., et al. (2011). Introgression of a major gene for high grain protein content in some Indian bread wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res. 123, 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, G., Fang, T., Zhang, H., Xie, C., Li, H., Yang, T., et al. (2009). Molecular identification of a new powdery mildew resistance gene Pm41 on chromosome 3BL derived from wild emmer (Triticum turgidum var. dicoccoides). Theor. Appl. Genet. 119, 531–539. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1061-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Feng, B., Xu, Z., Fan, X., Jiang, F., Jin, X., et al. (2018). A genome-wide association study of wheat yield and quality-related traits in southwest China. Mol. Breed. 38:1. doi: 10.1007/s11032-017-0759-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Li, S., Yang, S. M., Yan, X., and Wu, B. H. (2016). Photosynthetic Characteristics of Wild Emmer and Its Hybrids with Common Wheat. Beijing: China Science and Technology. Available at: http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201601-84

Google Scholar

Liu, W., Maccaferri, M., Rynearson, S., Letta, T., Zegeye, H., Tuberosa, R., et al. (2017a). Novel sources of stripe rust resistance identified by genome-wide association mapping in Ethiopian durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum). Front. Plant Sci. 8:774. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00774

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Lin, Y., Gao, S., Li, Z., Ma, J., Deng, M., et al. (2017b). A genome-wide association study of 23 agronomic traits in Chinese wheat landraces. Plant J. 91, 861–873. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13614

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Menguer, P. K., Vincent, T., Miller, A. J., Brown, J. K., Vincze, E., Borg, S., et al. (2018). Improving zinc accumulation in cereal endosperm using HvMTP 1, a transition metal transporter. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 63–71. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12749

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishra, V. K., Gupta, P. K., Arun, B., Vasistha, N. K., Vishwakarma, M. K., SinghYadav, P., et al. (2015). Introgression of a gene for high grain protein content (Gpc-B1) into two leading cultivars of wheat in Eastern Gangetic Plains of India through marker assisted backcross breeding. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 7, 292–300. doi: 10.5897/JPBCS2015.0514

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murray, M. G., and Thompson, W. F. (1980). Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 4321–4326. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peleg, Z., Cakmak, I., Ozturk, L., Yazici, A., Jun, Y., Budak, H., et al. (2009). Quantitative trait loci conferring grain mineral nutrient concentrations in durum wheat × wild emmer wheat RIL population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119, 353–369. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1044-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peleg, Z., Fahima, T., Abbo, S., Krugman, T., Nevo, E., Yakir, D., et al. (2005). Genetic diversity for drought resistance in wild emmer wheat and its ecogeographical associations. Plant Cell Environ. 28, 176–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01259.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peleg, Z., Saranga, Y., Krugman, T., Abbo, S., Nevo, E., and Fahima, T. (2008a). Allelic diversity associated with aridity gradient in wild emmer wheat popu-lations. Plant Cell Environ.31, 39–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01731.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peleg, Z., Saranga, Y., Yazici, A., Fahima, T., Ozturk, L., and Cakmak, I. (2008b). Grain zinc, iron and protein concentrations and zinc-efficiency in wild emmer wheat under contrasting irrigation regimes. Plant Soil 306, 57–67. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9417-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pettersson, C. G., and Eckersten, H. (2007). Prediction of grain protein in spring malting barley grown in northern Europe. Eur. J. Agron. 27, 205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.04.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., Rosenberg, N. A., and Donnelly, P. (2000). Association mapping in structured populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 170–181. doi: 10.1086/302959

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simmonds, N. W. (1995). The relation between yield and protein in cereal grain. J. Sci. Food Agric. 67, 309–315. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740670306

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sperotto, R. A., Ricachenevsky, F. K., Duarte, G. L., Boff, T., Lopes, K. L., Sperb, E. R., et al. (2009). Identification of up-regulated genes in flag leaves during rice grain filling and characterization of OsNAC5, a new ABA-dependent transcription factor. Planta 230, 985–1002. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-1000-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, J., Fan, S., Li, L., Wei, H., Wang, C., Wang, H., et al. (2016). Detection of favorable QTL alleles and candidate genes for lint percentage by GWAS in Chinese upland cotton. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1576. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01576

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suprayogi, Y., Pozniak, C. J., Clarke, F. R., Clarke, J. M., Knox, R. E., and Singh, A. K. (2009). Identification and validation of quantitative trait loci for grain protein concentration in adapted Canadian durum wheat populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119, 437–448. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1050-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tabbita, F., Lewis, S., Vouilloz, J. P., Ortega, M. A., Kade, M., Abbate, P. E., et al. (2013). Effects of the Gpc-B1 locus on high grain protein content introgressed into a rgentinean wheat germplasm. Plant Breed. 132, 48–52. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tadesse, W., Ogbonnaya, F. C., Jighly, A., Sanchez-Garcia, M., Sohail, Q., Rajaram, S., et al. (2015). Genome-wide association mapping of yield and grain quality traits in winter wheat genotypes. PLoS One 10:e0141339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Terasawa, Y., Ito, M., Tabiki, T., Nagasawa, K., Hatta, K., and Nishio, Z. (2016). Mapping of a major QTL associated with protein content on chromosome 2B in hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Breed. Sci. 66, 471–480. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.16026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsilo, T. J., Hareland, G. A., Simsek, S., Chao, S., and Anderson, J. A. (2010). Genome mapping of kernel characteristics in hard red spring wheat breeding lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121, 717–730. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1343-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uauy, C., Brevis, J. C., and Dubcovsky, J. (2006a). The high grain protein content gene Gpc-B1 accelerates senescence and has pleiotropic effects on protein content in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 2785–2794. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uauy, C., Distelfeld, A., Fahima, T., Blechl, A., and Dubcovsky, J. (2006b). A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and iron content in wheat. Science 314, 1298–1301. doi: 10.1126/science.1133649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Velu, G., Singh, R. P., Crespo-Herrera, L., Juliana, P., Dreisigacker, S., Valluru, R., et al. (2018). Genetic dissection of grain zinc concentration in spring wheat for mainstreaming biofortification in CIMMYT wheat breeding. Sci. Rep. 8:13526. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31951-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Veraverbeke, W. S., and Delcour, J. A. (2002). Wheat protein composition and properties of wheat glutenin in relation to breadmaking functionality. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 42, 179–208. doi: 10.1080/10408690290825510

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vishwakarma, M. K., Arun, B., Mishra, V. K., Yadav, P. S., Kumar, H., and Joshi, A. K. (2016). Marker-assisted improvement of grain protein content and grain weight in Indian bread wheat. Euphytica 208, 313–321. doi: 10.1007/s10681-015-1598-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, D. (2015). The Expression Level of NAM-B1 Gene and its Effect on Grain Nutritional Quality in Derivatives between Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides and Common Wheat Cultivar Chuannong 16 (in Chinese). Master dissertation, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an. doi: 10.1007/s10681-015-1598-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, N., Chen, B., Xu, K., Gao, G., Li, F., Qiao, J., et al. (2016). Association mapping of flowering time QTLs and insight into their contributions to rapeseed growth habits. Front. Plant Sci. 7:338. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Huang, L., Wu, B., Hu, J., Jiang, Z., Qi, P., et al. (2018). Characterization of an integrated active Glu-1Ay allele in common wheat from wild emmer and its potential role in flour improvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:E923. doi: 10.3390/ijms19040923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waters, S. P., Peoples, M. B., Simpson, R. J., and Dalling, M. J. (1980). Nitrogen redistribution during grain growth in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Planta 148, 422–428. doi: 10.1007/BF00552654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weegels, P. L., Van de Pijpekamp, A. M., Graveland, A., Hamer, R. J., and Schofield, J. D. (1996). Depolymerisation and re-polymerisation of wheat glutenin during dough processing. I. Relationships between glutenin macropolymer content and quality parameters. J. Cereal Sci. 23, 103–111. doi: 10.1006/jcrs.1996.0010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, B., Lu, J., Li, P., Hu, X., and Zheng, Y. (2008). Genetic diversity and potential utilization of grain protein content and sink traits in Triticum dicoccoides. J. Sichuan Agric. Univ. 26, 221–225.

Google Scholar

Xiao, Y., Tong, H., Yang, X., Xu, S., Pan, Q., Qiao, F., et al. (2016). Genome-wide dissection of the maize ear genetic architecture using multiple populations. New Phytol. 210, 1095–1106. doi: 10.1111/nph.13814

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, N., Lu, Y., Yang, X., Huang, J., Zhou, Y., Ali, F., et al. (2014). Genome wide association studies using a new nonparametric model reveal the genetic architecture of 17 agronomic traits in an enlarged maize association panel. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, H., and Tian, J. (2012). Association between starch pasting properties and DArT markers in common wheat. Acta Agron. Sin. 38, 1997–2006. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01997

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, H., Xiao, J., and Tian, J. (2014). Genome-wide association analysis of flour color (Whiteness) using DArT markers in common wheat. Acta Agron. Sin. 40, 2198–2202. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.02198

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, J., Pressoir, G., Briggs, W. H., Bi, I. V., Yamasaki, M., Doebley, J. F., et al. (2006). A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38, 203–208. doi: 10.1038/ng1702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, F. J., Su, Y. H., Dunham, S. J., Rakszegi, M., Bedo, Z., McGrath, S. P., et al. (2009). Variation in mineral micronutrient concentrations in grain of wheat lines of diverse origin. J. Cereal Sci. 49, 290–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.11.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: wild emmer wheat, common wheat, GPC, wide hybridization, GWAS

Citation: Liu J, Huang L, Wang C, Liu Y, Yan Z, Wang Z, Xiang L, Zhong X, Gong F, Zheng Y, Liu D and Wu B (2019) Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Novel Genomic Regions Associated With High Grain Protein Content in Wheat Lines Derived From Wild Emmer Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 10:464. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00464

Received: 19 November 2018; Accepted: 28 March 2019;
Published: 16 April 2019.

Edited by:

Petr Smýkal, Palacký University Olomouc, Czechia

Reviewed by:

Shahidul Islam, Murdoch University, Australia
Francesca Taranto, Council for Agricultural and Economics Research, Italy

Copyright © 2019 Liu, Huang, Wang, Liu, Yan, Wang, Xiang, Zhong, Gong, Zheng, Liu and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Bihua Wu, wubihua2017@126.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.