ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Cell Wall Layer Induced in Xylem Fibers of Flax Upon Gravistimulation Is Similar to Constitutively Formed Cell Walls of Bast Fibers
- 1Laboratory of Plant Cell Growth Mechanisms, Kazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Federal Research Center Kazan Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia
- 2Microscopy Cabinet, Kazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Federal Research Center Kazan Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia
In the fibers of many plant species after the formation of secondary cell walls, cellulose-enriched cell wall layers (often named G-layers or tertiary cell walls) are deposited which are important in many physiological situations. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) phloem fibers constitutively develop tertiary cell walls during normal plant growth. During the gravitropic response after plant inclination, the deposition of a cellulose-enriched cell wall layer is induced in xylem fibers on one side of the stem, providing a system similar to that of tension wood in angiosperm trees. Atomic force microscopy (AFM), immunochemistry, and transcriptomic analyses demonstrated that the G-layer induced in flax xylem fibers was similar to the constitutively formed tertiary cell wall of bast (phloem) fibers but different from the secondary cell wall. The tertiary cell walls, independent of tissue of origin and inducibility, were twice as stiff as the secondary cell walls. In the gravitropic response, the tertiary cell wall deposition rate in xylem was higher than that of the secondary cell wall. Rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I) with galactan side chains was a prominent component in cellulose-rich layers of both phloem and xylem flax fibers. Transcriptomic events underlying G-layer deposition in phloem and xylem fibers had much in common. At the induction of tertiary cell wall deposition, several genes for rhamnosyltransferases of the GT106 family were activated in xylem samples. The same genes were expressed in the isolated phloem fibers depositing the tertiary cell wall. The comparison of transcriptomes in fibers with both inducible and constitutive tertiary cell wall deposition and xylem tissues that formed the secondary cell walls is an effective system that revealed important molecular players involved in the formation of cellulose-enriched cell walls.
The plant cell wall is a complex polysaccharide-based structure, whose composition and architecture depend on plant species, cell function, stage of development, and environmental factors. In the fibers of many plant species, cellulose-enriched cell wall layers (often named gelatinous layers or G-layers) are deposited after the formation of secondary cell walls that are important in many physiological situations (Gorshkova et al., 2012, 2018). These layers are deposited only in fibers, although these cells may be derived from both primary and secondary meristems and belong to both xylem and phloem in various plant organs. Examples include the fibers of roots and hypocotyls of geophytes (Fisher, 2008; Schreiber et al., 2010; Tomlinson et al., 2014), aerial roots (Zimmermann et al., 1968; Tomlinson et al., 2014), vine stems (Fisher and Blanco, 2014), and spines and cladode junction regions of cactuses (Bobich and Nobel, 2002). The best-studied examples are the fibers of tension wood (Côté et al., 1969; Gorshkova et al., 2015; Gritsch et al., 2015; Guedes et al., 2017) and the bast fibers of fiber crops (reviewed in Gorshkova et al., 2012; Gorshkova et al., 2018). In tension wood of trees, such fiber cell wall layers are induced in negative gravitropic reactions and are deposited asymmetrically in fibers from one side of inclined stems (Fahn, 1990; Groover, 2016). Cellulose-enriched cell wall layers of bast fibers emerge during constitutive fiber development and are in all fibers around the stem circumference (Esau, 1965). Thus, the regulation of such cell wall layer deposition may have distinct features. However, in fibers of different origin, compositions and architectures of the cellulose-enriched cell wall layers are very similar. These layers have an exceedingly high content of cellulose (Norberg and Meier, 1966) and close to axial orientation of cellulose microfibrils (Clair et al., 2011). Xylan is absent (Gorshkova et al., 2015; Chernova et al., 2018; Behr et al., 2019), as is lignin (Love et al., 1994; Kaku et al., 2009; Gorshkova et al., 2012). The latter, however, can sometimes be deposited at a late stage of fiber maturation (Roussel and Clair, 2015). The major polysaccharide of the cell wall matrix is rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I) with side chains of β-1,4-galactans (Gorshkova et al., 2010, 2015; Guedes et al., 2017).
Despite such similarities, fibers of tension wood and bast fibers are usually studied separately, with different scientific schools using different approaches and terminology (reviewed in Clair et al., 2018; Gorshkova et al., 2018). Cellulose-enriched cell wall layers of tension wood fibers are called G-layers of secondary cell walls (Clair et al., 2018). Similar layers in bast fibers are called tertiary cell walls to emphasize the major differences from secondary cell walls in cell wall composition, architecture, mode of formation, and function (Gorshkova et al., 2018). The name is based on the sequence of deposition: a fiber first deposits the primary cell wall, then the secondary cell wall, and, only then, the tertiary cell wall (Gorshkova et al., 2012). The tertiary cell wall is found only in fibers and provides tissue tension (Alméras et al., 2020), whereas the secondary cell wall fixes cell shape after cell enlargement is completed. The secondary cell wall is in all fibers of all plant species, whereas the tertiary cell wall, although widespread in fibers of different origin, is not necessarily in all fibers of the same plant or in all plant species (Gorshkova et al., 2012). The tertiary cell wall is characterized by intensive post-deposition remodeling in which the newly formed portions of cell wall material are later transformed into mature ones. The newly deposited and mature layers of the tertiary cell wall can be distinguished under microscopy and were historically named as Gn- and G-layers, respectively (Gorshkova et al., 2004).
Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) and many other angiosperms have fibers in both the phloem and xylem parts of the stem (Esau, 1965). Flax phloem fibers constitutively develop thick tertiary cell walls during normal plant growth, whereas xylem fibers of the flax stem deposit only secondary cell walls (Gorshkova et al., 2012). However, in the gravitropic response after plant inclination, the formation of cellulose-enriched cell walls is induced in xylem fibers on the upper side of the stem (Ibragimova et al., 2017), resembling the tension wood formation. Flax xylem and phloem fibers differ in their origin and morphology (Esau, 1965). In flax, primary phloem fibers originate only from the procambium close to the apical meristem, whereas most xylem fibers in the stem originate from the cambium (Esau, 1965; Fahn, 1990). Although primary phloem fibers are the longest plant cells, reaching many centimeters, the length of secondary xylem fibers is less than a millimeter (Bourmaud et al., 2018).
A comparison of the properties of cellulose-enriched cell walls formed in phloem and xylem fibers of the same plant may reveal similarities and differences between constitutively and inducibly formed cellulose-enriched cell wall layers in fibers that are different in origin and morphology. Therefore, atomic force microscopy (AFM), immunochemistry, and the expression of marker genes were used to compare cell walls formed in phloem and xylem fibers of flax. The study showed that the cellulose-enriched cell wall layer induced in flax xylem fibers under gravistimulation was similar to the constitutively formed tertiary cell wall of bast fibers but very different from the secondary cell wall.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material and Gravistimulation
Flax plants (L. usitatissimum L. “Mogilevsky”) were grown in boxes with a 50-cm soil layer under natural light with daily watering. Forty-day-old plants (approximately 35 cm in height) were stapled to the soil at the cotyledon level to orient them horizontally. The gravitropic response was developed for 96 h during which plants returned to a vertical position by forming a gravitropic bend in the lower part of the stem (Figure 1). The gravitropic bend region (an approximately 5-cm-long segment beginning 3 cm above the cotyledons) and the corresponding part of control plants (which were not inclined) were studied. The upper (concave) part of the gravitropic bend was designated as the pulling side and the lower (convex) part as the opposite side (Figure 1). The phloem and xylem parts of the stem were collected separately for RNA-Seq in the control and after 8, 24, and 96 h of gravitropic response. Fiber-enriched stem peels represented phloem parts of the stem. They were washed several times in 80% (w/v) ethanol in a mortar with gentle pestling to isolate phloem fibers (sample FIB in RNA-Seq). Undivided stem parts in the control and stem regions divided into pulling and opposite sides after 96 h of gravistimulation were collected for fluorescence microscopy and AFM.
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental design. Flax plants were inclined and stapled to the soil at the level of the cotyledons. Gravitropic response developed over 96 h. Five-cm-long stem segments beginning at 3 cm above the cotyledons were used in the analyses. The upper part of the gravitropic bend was designated as the pulling side (PUL) and the lower part as the opposite side (OPP). Phloem and xylem (XYL) parts of the stem were collected separately for RNA-Seq in the control and after 8, 24, and 96 h of gravitropic response. Phloem parts were washed several times in ethanol in a mortar with gentle pestling to isolate phloem fibers (FIB). All samples for fluorescence microscopy and atomic force microscopy were collected 96 h after gravistimulation. Control samples were taken from the non-inclined plants, at the same stem level and at the same time as for the inclined plants.
Sample Preparation for Fluorescent and Atomic Force Microscopy
A 1-cm-long fragment was cut from the initially collected 5-cm-long stem segments (see above). Segments of gravistimulated flax were divided into pulling and opposite sides. Control stems were also cut in halves vertically to provide better solution permeability. Samples were fixed overnight in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde solution in 0.2 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). For proper AFM investigation, stem fragments needed to be oriented vertically in the embedding capsule. To achieve this goal, stem fragments were first embedded in 3% (w/w) low-melting point agarose. Then, agarose blocks with samples were dehydrated in a graded aqueous ethanol series (80:20, 60:40, 40:60, 20:80, and 0:100) and progressively infiltrated with London Resin White (LRW, EMS, Hatfield, PA, United States) in a graded acetone LRW series (80:20, 60:40, 40:60, 20:80, and 0:100). During this passage, the samples were stored at +4°C to avoid polymerization. Samples in 100% resin were kept overnight at −20°C and then for several h at room temperature. The heat curing was performed in flat-bottom Beem capsules (EMS, Hatfield, PA, United States) at 60°C for 24 h.
Thin sections (700 nm thickness) for immunohistochemistry were prepared using a glass knife on an LKB8800 ultramicrotome (LKB Instruments, Bromma, Sweden) and collected on silane-coated microscope slides (EMS, Hatfield, PA, United States). Immunohistochemical analysis of cell wall polymers was performed using LM5 and LM11 (Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom) antibodies. For immunolocalization, the sections were (1) blocked with 0.2 M PBS (pH 7.4) containing 2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature; (2) incubated with one of the primary monoclonal antibodies diluted 1:5 for 1.5 h at room temperature and then washed three times with PBS; and (3) incubated with secondary anti-rat IgG linked to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) diluted 1:100 in PBS (0.2 M, pH 7.4) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. The primary antibody treatment was omitted for the negative controls. After the labeling reaction, the sections were washed four times in PBS and twice in water. Sections were observed using a Leica DM1000 epifluorescence microscope (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) fitted with a mercury lamp. Sections were observed under epifluorescence settings with the filter cube (excitation filter 460–500 nm, barrier filter 512–542 nm). Exposure time was maintained constant. The fluorescence intensity was measured on high-magnification images using ImageJ2 Fiji software1. After background removal by “rolling ball” function, the mean signal intensity was determined in the square of fixed size placed on the particular cell wall layer.
Atomic Force Microscopy
Resin blocks with embedded stem parts that remained after sectioning for immunochemical analysis were additionally polished by diamond knife (EMS) on an LKB8800 ultramicrotome (LKB Instruments). AFM was performed at room temperature and constant humidity using an NTEGRA Prima (NT-MDT, Zelenograd, Russia) microscope. The AFM HybriD mode was used to obtain the stiffness and elasticity maps using HA_HR tips (NT-MDT) with a typical resonance frequency of 380 kHz, average spring constant of 34 N m–1, and apex radius of 10 nm. The thermal tune procedure was performed for each new cantilever to determine its unique spring constant. Deflection sensitivity was determined at room temperature on a fresh cover glass for each new cantilever, between samples, and every time after laser adjustment. Scanning was conducted at a speed of 5 s per line in both forward and backward directions. The typical scanning area was 70 × 70 μm with 512 × 512 point resolution. Force-indentation curves devoid of artifacts were selected manually from the elasticity map and fitted to a Derjaguin–Muller–Toporov (DMT) model of contact between a sphere and a half-space. The reliability of obtained data was checked by the apparent elastic modulus of LRW resin, which had to be between 3 and 5 GPa, as shown by Arnould et al. (2017) using a similar technique. Measurements of cell wall thickness were conducted on stiffness maps using the line tool of Nova Px 3.4 software (NT-MDT).
RNA-Seq Data Processing
The high-quality reads of 28 RNA-Seq data sets from the stem samples of non-inclined control and gravistimulated plants after 8, 24, and 96 h of gravitropic response (Figure 1) were obtained, deposited as BioProject PRJNA631357 in the Sequence Read Archive2, verified by PCR, and partially described previously (Mokshina et al., 2017, 2018, 2020; Gorshkov et al., 2018). In this paper, the names of the samples were simplified compared with those of deposited ones. sXYLb in the database corresponds to XYL in the current paper and tFIBb to FIB.
The bioinformatic analysis was performed according to the algorithm presented in Mokshina et al. (2020). Briefly, the alignment of reads to the flax genome (Wang et al., 2012), transcriptomic assembly, and analysis of differentially expressed genes were performed using HISAT2, StringTie (Pertea et al., 2016), and the R package DESeq2 (Love et al., 2015). In the pre-filtered data set of 31,351 genes, those with normalized counts of total gene reads (TGR) more than or equal to 16 in at least one sample were considered to be expressed, according to the recommendation of the SEQC/MAQC-III Consortium (2014). The mRNAs with twofold changes in expression and padjusted (adjusted p-value) < 0.01 were identified in DESeq2 as differentially expressed genes. The pairwise comparison with control samples was conducted at each time point according to the stem fragment (pulling or opposite side) and tissue type (phloem fibers or xylem). The search for the closest Populus homologs of the target flax genes was performed using the program BLAST+ (Camacho et al., 2009) and the Plant Comparative Genomics portal, Phytozome v123.
The flax genes of the glycosyltransferase (GT) 106 protein family were identified by the PF10250 Pfam domain in protein sequences of the flax genome using HMMer 3.3 software4 and a local BLAST search implemented in BioEdit 7.0.5 software (Hall, 1999) with AtRRT1 (At5g15740) as a query. The Pfam domain profile was obtained from the Pfam 32.0 database5 (El-Gebali et al., 2019), and the flax genome was downloaded from the Phytozome v12.1 database6 (Goodstein et al., 2012). The protein sequences of deduced flax GT106 genes were additionally checked for the characteristic IPR024709 domain in the InterProScan tool of the InterPro database7 (Mitchell et al., 2019). Sequences that did not possess that domain were excluded from further analysis. The Arabidopsis thaliana GT106 member gene list by Takenaka et al. (2018) was annotated according to the Uniprot database (release 2020_05)8 (Bateman et al., 2019). The obtained plant protein sequences were aligned with one another in the web-based service Clustal Omega9 (Madeira et al., 2019). The alignment was subjected to a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis, which was performed using IQTREE1.6.9 software (Nguyen et al., 2015). The best-fit model of sequence evolution was selected using Bayesian Information Criterion implemented in ModelFinder (IQTREE1.6.9) (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017). The ultrafast bootstrap branch support (Minh et al., 2013) with 10,000 replicates was used to construct the dendrogram (values less than 95 were not significant). The unrooted tree was visualized using the web-based service iTOL 5.310 (Letunic and Bork, 2019) and corrected in Adobe Illustrator CC 2017.
Four biological replicates of each sample were examined for cell wall mechanical properties using AFM. Four biological replicates for each antibody were used in the immunocytochemical analysis. Mean values with standard deviations among biological replicates are presented. Mean separation was performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test at α = 0.01, using the SPSS software (v 21, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States).
Flax gravistimulation was conducted as described previously (Ibragimova et al., 2017, 2020; Gorshkov et al., 2018; Figure 1). Plants returned to the vertical position 96 h after the inclination. The most pronounced gravitropic bend was formed in the stem region above the cotyledons. The upper (concave) part of the gravitropic bend was designated as the pulling side and the lower part (convex) as the opposite side (Figure 1).
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to clarify the nature of thickened cell walls in different stem tissues in response to the gravistimulation of flax plants. Xylan is a typical component of secondary cell walls, whereas β-1,4-galactan is characteristic of tertiary cell walls (Gorshkova et al., 2018). Thus, LM11 and LM5 antibodies recognizing 1,4-β-D-xylan/arabinoxylan and 1,4-β-D-galactan, respectively, were used on cross sections of control and 96-h gravistimulated flax plants (Figure 1). Consistent with previous observations (McCartney et al., 2005; Chernova et al., 2020), the LM11 antibody was heavily bound to xylem cell walls in control plants (Figure 2A), whereas in phloem fibers, xylan epitopes were restricted to the thin outer cell wall layer and were not present in the thick tertiary cell walls. The LM11 antibody bound to xylem cell walls on both the pulling and opposite sides of the gravitropic bend. However, the labeled cell walls in the xylem of the pulling side appeared thinner than those of the opposite side and control plants (Figure 2A).
Figure 2. Fluorescence micrographs of flax stem cross sections immunolabeled by (A) LM11 (xylan) and (B) LM5 (1,4-galactan) antibodies in control plants and after 4 days (96 h) of gravistimulation. Bars are 100 μm. Ph, phloem; X, xylem. (C) Mean fluorescence intensity of different cell walls. TCW, tertiary cell wall; G and Gn, G and Gn layers. Values are the mean ± SD. Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference according to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test at α = 0.01.
The LM5 antibody was detected in the thickened cell walls of the phloem fibers in control and pulling- and opposite-side samples (Figure 2B), confirming their tertiary nature. The labeling of phloem fibers on the pulling side was more intense than that in the control or opposite-side samples (Figure 2C). This difference might be due to a change in the ratio of G- and Gn-layers in the tertiary cell wall of the different phloem fibers. On the pulling stem side, the LM5 antibody bound to the thickened cell walls of some xylem fibers (Figure 2B). This result indicated that those fibers might have switched to deposition of tertiary cell walls instead of secondary ones as a result of gravistimulation.
Atomic Force Microscopy of Cell Walls
The two distinct layers of tertiary cell walls, G and Gn, were easily observed in some phloem fibers on stiffness maps (Figure 3A). The G-layers appeared denser than the Gn-layers. The stiffness of G-layers was higher than that of Gn layers, as determined by the lighter tone of the former than the latter on stiffness maps (Figure 3A). Phloem fibers with G- and Gn-layers were observed in control plants and on both pulling and opposite sides of gravistimulated plants. Similar structures appeared in some xylem fibers on the pulling side. The AFM results correlated well with the LM5 labeling and further confirmed the tertiary nature of the thickened cell walls.
Figure 3. Atomic force microscopy of fiber cell walls in control and gravistimulated flax plants 96 h after stem inclination. (A) Stiffness (N/m) maps of phloem (top) and xylem (bottom) fibers in control and gravistimulated flax plants. One representative image for each variant is shown. Stiffness scales are on the right side of each map. Bars are 10 μm. G- and Gn-layers of tertiary cell walls in phloem and similar structures in the cell walls of xylem fibers on the pulling side are indicated. S indicates secondary cell walls. Parallel lines on each image are scratches left by the knife. (B) Thickness (μm) and (C) Apparent elasticity modulus (GPa) of different cell wall layers. SCW, secondary cell walls; TCW, tertiary cell walls. Values are the mean ± SD. Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference according to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test at α = 0.01 (individual comparisons are shown by regular, italic, and bold-type fonts of these letters).
The thickness of different cell wall layers in different tissues was measured in the stiffness maps (Figure 3B). In control plants, the thickness of the secondary cell wall layer of xylem cells was 1.92 ± 0.07 μm. In gravistimulated plants, xylem cells on the opposite side had the thickest secondary cell walls (2.33 ± 0.24 μm, Figure 3B). The secondary cell wall thickness between xylem cells on the pulling side of the stem was different depending on whether tertiary cell walls were present. In cells without a tertiary cell wall layer, the secondary cell wall thickness was similar to that of control plants, whereas with a tertiary cell wall, the secondary cell walls of xylem cells on the pulling side were significantly thinner (1.36 ± 0.01 μm) than those of other xylem cells. With this value considered as a zero point for secondary cell wall formation, xylem fibers in control plants and those that did not begin to develop G-layers deposited 0.39–0.56 μm of secondary cell walls over 96 h. Xylem cells on the opposite side of the stem accumulated 0.97 μm of cell wall thickness in the same period.
Different layers of tertiary cell walls (G and Gn) were measured separately. The Gn-layers in phloem fibers and the xylem cells on the pulling side of inclined plants were 2.25 ± 0.57 and 1.92 ± 0.07 μm thick, respectively. The G-layers of phloem fibers were the thickest in the control (6.98 ± 0.18 μm). Phloem fibers on both pulling and opposite sides of gravistimulated plants had thinner G-layers than that of the control; this effect was especially pronounced in fibers on the pulling side (Figure 3B). Among all phloem fibers, the lowest G/Gn ratio was for those on the pulling side. This result might explain the difference in the intensity of their LM5 labeling (Figure 2), because Gn is more intensively labeled with this antibody (Gorshkova et al., 2004). Xylem fibers on the pulling side deposited 1.61 ± 0.14 μm of G-layer in the gravitropic response.
Apparent elasticity moduli of different cell wall layers deposited by cells of different tissues were also measured by AFM (Figure 3C). Secondary cell walls of xylem had an apparent elasticity modulus of 11.5–12.0 GPa, whether or not the plant was inclined. Similarly, there was no difference between the mechanical properties of Gn-layers, with no dependence on the plant state or the tissue that produced the cell walls (Figure 3C). The apparent elasticity modulus of G-layers (19.1–19.6 GPa) was higher than that of either secondary cell walls or Gn-layers. Values were similar in phloem fibers of control and pulling and opposite sides of gravistimulated plants, as well as for G-layers developed by xylem cells on the pulling side.
Genes Specifically Expressed in the Xylem of Gravistimulated Plants
The induction from zero tertiary cell wall deposition in xylem fibers from the pulling stem side in the gravitropic response provided the basis to reveal the genes involved. Gene expression was evaluated by comparing transcriptomes in xylem stem parts from the pulling stem side with those in the initial state in the non-inclined control and the opposite stem side. In the pairwise comparison of xylem samples from the gravistimulated and control flax stems, 5,582 upregulated genes were identified, of which 222 genes were characteristic only for the pulling side of the stem and were activated at least in one of the analyzed time-points after gravistimulation (8, 24, and 96 h).
Ten genes had significantly higher expression in xylem cells of the pulling stem side than in those of both the opposite side and control plants at all stages of gravitropic response (Fold change ≥ 2, padjusted < 0.01) (Table 1). Four of the genes encoded fasciclin-like arabinogalactan (FLA) proteins (Lus10036113, Lus10002985, Lus10036114, and Lus10002986), and three were annotated as O-fucosyltransferases (Lus10035540, Lus10007975, and Lus10013503). The other three genes were annotated as a protein kinase (Lus10016382), a protein of unknown function, DUF707 (Lus10032090), and a cytochrome P450, CYP76C6 (Lus10006323). The expression of these genes (except Lus10006323) also increased in the phloem fibers of the pulling side compared with that of control phloem fibers.
Table 1. Flax genes continuously upregulated (fold change ≥ 2, padjusted < 0.01) in the pulling-side xylem but not in the opposite side of inclined plants in the comparison with control xylem.
The putative O-fucosyltransferases encoded by the upregulated genes had the PF10250 domain in their predicted amino acid sequences and thus belong to the GT106 protein family (Takenaka et al., 2018). Four members (of 34 total in A. thaliana) in this family have been characterized as RG-I:rhamnosyltransferases (RRTs) involved in the formation of the RG-I backbone (EC 220.127.116.111) (Takenaka et al., 2018). To establish the relations between the flax genes upregulated during the gravitropic response and the characterized members of GT106, the phylogenetic tree of that family was constructed (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic dendrogram of plant GT106 protein family members (with PF10250 and IPR024709 domains) of flax (black) and Arabidopsis thaliana (red). Dark gray confines the RG-I:rhamnosyltransferase (RRT) clade, according to Takenaka et al. (2018), and light gray indicates the RRT clade size, according to Wachananawat et al. (2020). Purple arrows show genes upregulated in the pulling side xylem during gravitropic response. The A. thaliana gene names are according to the annotation of the Uniprot database8 (Bateman et al., 2019). Numbers indicate the ultrafast bootstrap support values; branch lengths were ignored.
Several gene clades formed the dendrogram of the GT106 members of flax and A. thaliana. Flax had twice as many GT106 members as Arabidopsis (61 vs. 34), which may indicate the specific physiological importance of reactions catalyzed by those enzymes for flax. According to Takenaka et al. (2018), the RRT clade consists of four Arabidopsis genes encoding RRT1, RRT2, RRT3, and RRT4, whereas the clade included 13 flax homologs (Figure 4). Four of the flax genes (including the upregulated Lus10007975 and Lus10013503) were in the same clade as RRT1 (At5g15740) and RRT2 (At3g02250) (Figure 4), suggesting similar catalytic functions.
The upregulated Lus10035540 and three other flax genes were in another clade of the GT106 tree with At3g54100, At3g37980, and At5g01100 (FRIABLE1, FRB1) (Figure 4). Of these genes, Lus10027753 was also upregulated in xylem of the pulling side (Table 1, gene shown by asterisk) but did not fully meet the criteria, because at 96 h after stem inclination, its upregulation was also detected in the opposite-side xylem. A recent study of GT106 members in Marchantia polymorpha also suggests that this clade contains RG-I:rhamnosyltransferases (Wachananawat et al., 2020; Figure 4). All four genes in the GT106 family that were upregulated in the xylem of the pulling stem side were actively expressed in all samples of phloem fibers (Table 1).
Nanomechanical Properties of Cell Walls Depend on Whether They Are Tertiary or Secondary but Not on the Tissue That Produces Them and Remain the Same in the Flax Gravitropic Response
AFM is a technique widely used to examine the mechanical properties of cell walls. The G and Gn apparent elasticity modulus values determined using AFM were in the same ranges as those shown previously for flax phloem fibers (Arnould et al., 2017; Goudenhooft et al., 2018). Similarly, the apparent modulus of secondary cell walls in hemp xylem determined using AFM (Coste et al., 2020) was comparable with that in flax (Figure 3C).
In the development of flax phloem fibers, there is a gradual transition from the newly deposited Gn-layer to the denser G-layer, which is accompanied by changes in their composition and architecture (Gorshkova et al., 2004, 2018). A corresponding increase in stiffness in the Gn to G transition reported previously (Goudenhooft et al., 2018) was confirmed in the current study (Figure 3C). Apparent elastic moduli of these layers remained constant during flax phloem fiber development, independent of the Gn/G ratio (Goudenhooft et al., 2018). The gravitropic reaction of flax also induced a difference in the ratio of G- and Gn-layer thickness between different sides of the plant and control plants (Figure 3B). However, the nanoscale properties of these layers themselves remained the same (Figure 3C). This observation is in contrast to that of Goudenhooft et al. (2019b) who observed changes in the mechanical performance of flax fibers with gravistimulation. However, tensile tests in that work were performed at the level of individual fibers, which can be strongly affected by major morphological changes occurring in phloem fibers of gravistimulated flax (Ibragimova et al., 2017), while their nanoscale properties remain constant. Moreover, in the current study, the nanomechanical properties of tertiary cell walls were independent of the tissue that produced them (Figure 3C). Thus, an intriguing possibility emerges of determining the cell wall nature (secondary or tertiary) by its apparent Young’s modulus.
Xylem Fibers Deposit Tertiary Cell Wall in the Gravitropic Reaction in Flax
Tertiary cell walls have several distinguishing features (Gorshkova et al., 2018). The RG-I with long galactan side chains is crucial in forming specific tertiary cell wall architecture (Gorshkova et al., 2010, 2018; Guedes et al., 2017). Either a galactan or RG-I backbone can be labeled in tertiary cell walls using LM5 or RU2 antibodies, respectively, depending on the plant species (Gorshkova et al., 2004; Chernova et al., 2018; Behr et al., 2019). The binding of LM5 to the thickened cell walls of xylem fibers was detected on the pulling side of the inclined flax (Figure 2). As noted previously, the initial deposition of a relatively loose Gn-layer and its gradual transformation into a denser G-layer is a typical developmental pattern for tertiary cell-walled cells (Gorshkova et al., 2004; Mikshina et al., 2013; Chernova et al., 2018; Gierlinger, 2018). The thickened cell walls in the flax pulling-side xylem had a similar combination of G and Gn layers (Figure 3A). Moreover, the elasticity moduli of these layers (Figure 3B) were the same as those found for flax phloem fibers using AFM (Goudenhooft et al., 2018).
Transcriptome analysis provided further evidence of the tertiary nature of thickened cell walls deposited by flax xylem in the gravitropic reaction. When compared with the opposite side and the control, in pulling-side xylem, four genes encoding FLAs and three genes encoding GT106 family members homologous to Arabidopsis and Marchantia RG-I:rhamnosyltransferases were significantly and continuously upregulated (Takenaka et al., 2018; Wachananawat et al., 2020; Table 1 and Figure 4). The importance of RG-I metabolism for tertiary cell wall formation was noted previously, and FLAs are well-known components of G-layers in tension wood (Lafarguette et al., 2004; Gerttula et al., 2015). Mokshina et al. (2020) previously described some of these genes as specifically expressed during the formation of the tertiary cell wall in flax phloem fibers in normal plant development. The four flax genes encoding FLAs, two genes encoding GT106 family members (Lus10007975, Lus10013503), and Lus10006323 (the cytochrome P450, CYP76C6) were homologous to Populus genes (Potri.004G210600, Potri.015G013300, Potri.015G048100, and Potri.001G109300), which were specifically expressed in gravistimulated poplar developing G-layers (Gerttula et al., 2015), indicating the similarity of the processes taking place in these two species.
The thickening of gelatinous layers was faster than that of secondary layers in tilted poplar (Abedini et al., 2015). Similarly, the rate of tertiary cell wall deposition on the pulling side of gravistimulated flax xylem was higher than that of secondary cell walls (Figure 3B). Xylem fibers that produced tertiary cell walls deposited approximately 3.5 μm of its thickness (Gn + G), whereas cells that continued to develop the secondary cell wall layer accumulated only 0.4 μm of its thickness.
The presence of rhamnogalacturonan epitopes, similar morphology and mechanical properties of thickened cell walls in pulling-side xylem and control phloem, high rate of cell wall deposition, and coincidental gene sets expressed in gravistimulated xylem of flax, poplar tension wood, and flax bast fibers indicate that pulling-side xylem fibers deposit tertiary (gelatinous) cell walls.
Xylem of Gravistimulated Flax Resembles Tension Wood of Arborescent Eudicots
There are few reports on the formation of reaction tissue in herbaceous plants. Tension wood can be induced in Arabidopsis grown under short-day and high-illumination conditions and with repeated clipping of inflorescence stems (Wyatt et al., 2010). This treatment leads to an increase in secondary xylem formation, including those inflorescence stems that are allowed to develop later. Decapitation and gravistimulation of such inflorescence stems induce tension wood formation (Wyatt et al., 2010). However, several attempts to reproduce these results failed (N. Mokshina and S. Lev-Yadun, personal communications).
Reaction tissue with gelatinous fibers is reported in both phloem and xylem of alfalfa internodes (Patten et al., 2007). However, the reaction nature of those G-fibers is doubtful, because stimulus was not applied to those plants to develop the reaction, and the G-layered tissues often were located around the stem circumference, breaking the rule of asymmetrical deposition for reaction wood (Fahn, 1990). In other reports of G-fibers in stems or tendrils of herbaceous plants (Meloche et al., 2007; Bowling and Vaughn, 2009), the term “gelatinous fibers” is not defined, and it is used for xylem fibers that are lignified with high abundance of xylans throughout the thickened cell walls, i.e., demonstrating the characteristics of normal secondary cell walls.
Thus, the gelatinous fibers developing within flax xylem with gravistimulation are one of the most reliable examples of tension wood formation in herbaceous plants. The possible reason for the reaction is the constitutive tension developed by bast fibers around the circumference of the stem (Alméras et al., 2020). This mechanism may allow for vertical orientation of the flax stem at an extremely low diameter-to-height ratio (Goudenhooft et al., 2019a). However, under gravistimulation, tension on the pulling side should increase, whereas it should decrease correspondingly on the opposite side to reorient the stem. The massive rearrangements observed in flax phloem fibers on transcriptional (Gorshkov et al., 2018), morphological (Ibragimova et al., 2017), and biochemical (Ibragimova et al., 2020) levels most likely indicate attempts to achieve that goal. The formation of tension wood in the xylem on the pulling side of the stem might also facilitate that effect.
Comparison of Transcriptomes in Fibers With Inducible and Constitutive Tertiary Cell Wall Deposition Helps to Reveal Important Molecular Players
The mechanisms responsible for the distinct composition and architecture of tertiary walls are of increasing interest. Many attempts have been made to characterize the genes with expression activated in xylem fibers at the induction of G-layers in the formation of tension wood (Paux et al., 2005; Andersson-Gunnerås et al., 2006; Gerttula et al., 2015; Mizrachi et al., 2015). The major obstacle in such studies is the impossibility of separating xylem fibers from other xylem tissues. However, comparisons of transcriptomes in different stem parts during certain stages of bast fiber development in several species of fiber crops provide important information (Roach and Deyholos, 2007; Guerriero et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2020). Unfortunately, different tissues also complicate this approach, and therefore, differences cannot be attributed solely to gelatinous fibers. In flax, phloem fibers are at an advanced stage of specialization when they form tertiary cell walls, and because they can be quickly separated from other tissues, the transcriptome can be analyzed in a specific cell type at a defined stage of development (Gorshkov et al., 2017). Because the immunochemistry and AFM results indicated that the tertiary cell walls in phloem and xylem fibers had basic similarities, the transcriptomes of samples that contained these fibers could be compared to reveal important molecular players involved in both inducible and constitutive tertiary cell wall deposition.
In such a comparison, based on strict thresholds, ten genes were continuously upregulated in the xylem of the pulling stem side compared with the opposite side and non-inclined plants (Table 1). The genes potentially involved in the formation of RG-I are of special interest, because it is currently the least understood of the major cell wall polymers. The mechanisms of its biosynthesis and the involved glycosyltransferases remain largely unknown (Amos and Mohnen, 2019). The induction of RG-I deposition in xylem fibers (Figure 2) was coupled to the activated expression of several genes encoding enzymes from the GT106 family (Table 1). Four upregulated genes belonged to two different branches of the large RRT clade (Figure 4), with one containing the homologs of RRT1 and the other those of FRB1. The same set of genes was expressed in all samples of phloem fibers. The enzymes encoded by homologs of both RRT1 (Takenaka et al., 2018) and FRB1 (Wachananawat et al., 2020) provide the same linkage in the RG-I backbone by adding rhamnosyl residue to the preceding galacturonosyl residue. The expression of the same four rhamnosyltransferase genes from GT106 in all samples that contained fibers depositing the tertiary cell wall but not in others (Table 1) suggests that the encoded enzymes are associated with the biosynthesis of RG-I, which is a characteristic component of tertiary cell walls (Gorshkova et al., 2018). Activation of RG-I biosynthesis in the phloem fibers on the pulling side of the plant, when compared with control plants, was suggested previously on the basis of biochemical and immunochemical data (Ibragimova et al., 2020). The results in the current study are consistent with those results, and all four GT106 genes that were activated in xylem of the pulling side were also upregulated in phloem fibers on the same stem side (Table 1).
The simultaneous expression of four different genes from the RRT clade in isolated phloem fibers indicated a complex consisting of similar but not identical proteins that might be involved in the formation of the RG-I backbone. The necessity of several proteins encoded by the members of the same gene family has been previously established for the biosynthesis of homogalacturonan (Atmodjo et al., 2011), xylan (Zeng et al., 2010), and cellulose (Desprez et al., 2007). A similar situation was recently suggested for MpRRT1-4 genes by Professor Ishimizu’s group based on analysis of expression in various organs of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha (Wachananawat et al., 2020).
Rhamnogalacturonan I is a complex polysaccharide that contains several different monosaccharides linked by numerous linkage types. However, upregulation was detected only for the genes of the enzymes that provided a specific linkage within the backbone (Table 1). This result could be explained by the poor identification of glycosyltransferases involved in RG-I biosynthesis (Amos and Mohnen, 2019). However, the flax homologs of At5g44670 that encodes the galactosyltransferase GALS1, which likely participates in formation of galactan side chains attached to the RG-I backbone (Liwanag et al., 2012), were not detected among those constitutively upregulated at induction of the G-layer, despite pronounced biosynthesis of galactan revealed by the LM5 antibody (Figure 2). Although their expression was pronounced, it was similar in xylem of pulling and opposite stem sides (data not shown). Collectively, these data suggest the formation of the complex that makes the RG-I backbone is the limiting step in the biosynthesis of this polymer.
Overall, the comparison of transcriptomes in fibers with inducible and constitutive tertiary cell wall deposition was effective in revealing important molecular players involved in the formation of cellulose-enriched cell walls. Further analysis of this system and extending the time scale of experiments to earlier stages of gravitropic response may provide clues to better understand the mechanisms of G-layer deposition and the regulation of cell wall formation in general.
Phloem fibers of many fiber crops form tertiary cell walls constitutively, while in xylem fibers of dicotyledonous trees the deposition of such walls can be induced by gravistimulation in so-called tension wood. Flax is the only unique example of herbaceous plant where both constitutive and inducible tertiary cell wall formation is possible. Using AFM, immunochemistry, and transcriptomic analysis, we have shown that these cell walls are similar in their immunogenicity and mechanical properties and recruit the same subset of genes during formation.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository and accession number can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA631357.
AP, LK, and TG: conceptualization. AP, LK, AN, MA, and OG: investigation. AP, LK, and MA: methodology. AP, AN, and OG: visualization. AP, OG, LK, and TG: writing—original draft. LK and TG: writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
This work was partially supported by the Russian Science Foundation [project number 19-14-00361, for AFM-analysis and RNA-Seq data processing]. The immunohistochemistry was performed with financial support from the government assignment for the FRC Kazan Scientific Center of RAS.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- ^ https://imagej.net/
- ^ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra
- ^ https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/
- ^ http://hmmer.org/
- ^ http://pfam.xfam.org/
- ^ https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html
- ^ https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/
- ^ https://www.uniprot.org/
- ^ https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/
- ^ https://itol.embl.de/
Abedini, R., Clair, B., Pourtahmasi, K., Laurans, F., and Arnould, O. (2015). Cell Wall thickening in developing tension wood of artificially bent poplar trees. IAWA J. 36, 44–57. doi: 10.1163/22941932-00000084
Alméras, T., Petrova, A., Kozlova, L., Gril, J., and Gorshkova, T. (2020). Evidence and quantitative evaluation of tensile maturation strain in flax phloem through longitudinal splitting. Botany 98, 9–19. doi: 10.1139/cjb-2019-0021
Amos, R. A., and Mohnen, D. (2019). Critical review of plant cell wall matrix polysaccharide glycosyltransferase activities verified by heterologous protein expression. Front. Plant Sci. 10:915. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00915
Andersson-Gunnerås, S., Mellerowicz, E. J., Love, J., Segerman, B., Ohmiya, Y., Coutinho, P. M., et al. (2006). Biosynthesis of cellulose-enriched tension wood in Populus: global analysis of transcripts and metabolites identifies biochemical and developmental regulators in secondary wall biosynthesis. Plant J. 45, 144–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02584.x
Arnould, O., Siniscalco, D., Bourmaud, A., Le Duigou, A., and Baley, C. (2017). Better insight into the nano-mechanical properties of flax fibre cell walls. Ind. Crops Prod. 97, 224–228. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.12.020
Atmodjo, M. A., Sakuragi, Y., Zhu, X., Burrell, A. J., Mohanty, S. S., Atwood, J. A., et al. (2011). Galacturonosyltransferase (GAUT)1 and GAUT7 are the core of a plant cell wall pectin biosynthetic homogalacturonan: galacturonosyltransferase complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 20225–20230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112816108
Behr, M., Faleri, C., Hausman, J. F., Planchon, S., Renaut, J., Cai, G., et al. (2019). Distribution of cell-wall polysaccharides and proteins during growth of the hemp hypocotyl. Planta 250, 1539–1556. doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03245-9
Bourmaud, A., Beaugrand, J., Shah, D. U., Placet, V., and Baley, C. (2018). Towards the design of high-performance plant fibre composites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 97, 347–408. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.05.005
Chernova, T., Ageeva, M., Mikshina, P., Trofimova, O., Kozlova, L., Lev-Yadun, S., et al. (2020). The living fossil Psilotum nudum has cortical fibers with mannan-based cell wall matrix. Front. Plant Sci. 11:488. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00488
Chernova, T. E., Mikshina, P. V., Salnikov, V. V., Ibragimova, N. N., Sautkina, O. V., and Gorshkova, T. A. (2018). Development of distinct cell wall layers both in primary and secondary phloem fibers of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 117, 97–109. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.082
Clair, B., Alméras, T., Pilate, G., Jullien, D., Sugiyama, J., and Riekel, C. (2011). Maturation stress generation in poplar tension wood studied by synchrotron radiation microdiffraction. Plant Physiol. 155, 562–570. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167270
Coste, R., Pernes, M., Tetard, L., Molinari, M., and Chabbert, B. (2020). Effect of the interplay of composition and environmental humidity on the nanomechanical properties of hemp fibers. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng. 8, 6381–6390. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00566
Desprez, T., Juraniec, M., Crowell, E. F., Jouy, H., Pochylova, Z., Parcy, F., et al. (2007). Organization of cellulose synthase complexes involved in primary cell wall synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 15572–15577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706569104
Fisher, J. B., and Blanco, M. A. (2014). Gelatinous fibers and variant secondary growth related to stem undulation and contraction in a monkey ladder vine, Bauhinia glabra (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 101, 608–616. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1300407
Gerttula, S., Zinkgraf, M., Muday, G. K., Lewis, D. R., Ibatullin, F. M., Brumer, H., et al. (2015). Transcriptional and hormonal regulation of gravitropism of woody stems in Populus. Plant Cell 27, 2800–2813. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00531
Goodstein, D. M., Shu, S. Q., Howson, R., Neupane, R., Hayes, R. D., Fazo, J., et al. (2012). Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D1178–D1186. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr944
Gorshkov, O., Mokshina, N., Gorshkov, V., Chemikosova, S., Gogolev, Y., and Gorshkova, T. (2017). Transcriptome portrait of cellulose-enriched flax fibres at advanced stage of specialization. Plant Mol. Biol. 93, 431–449. doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0571-7
Gorshkov, O., Mokshina, N., Ibragimova, N., Ageeva, M., Gogoleva, N., and Gorshkova, T. (2018). Phloem fibres as motors of gravitropic behaviour of flax plants: level of transcriptome. Funct. Plant Biol. 45, 203–214. doi: 10.1071/Fp16348
Gorshkova, T., Brutch, N., Chabbert, B., Deyholos, M., Hayashi, T., Lev-Yadun, S., et al. (2012). Plant fiber formation: state of the art, recent and expected progress, and open questions. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 31, 201–228. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2011.616096
Gorshkova, T., Mokshina, N., Chernova, T., Ibragimova, N., Salnikov, V., Mikshina, P., et al. (2015). Aspen tension wood fibers contain beta-(1 -> 4)-galactans and acidic arabinogalactans retained by cellulose microfibrils in gelatinous walls. Plant Physiol. 169, 2048–2063. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00690
Gorshkova, T. A., Chemikosova, S. B., Sal’nikov, V. V., Pavlencheva, N. V., Gur’janov, O. P., Stolle-Smits, T., et al. (2004). Occurrence of cell-specific galactan is coinciding with bast fiber developmental transition in flax. Ind. Crops Prod. 19, 217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.002
Gorshkova, T. A., Gurjanov, O. P., Mikshina, P. V., Ibragimova, N. N., Mokshina, N. E., Salnikov, V. V., et al. (2010). Specific type of secondary cell wall formed by plant fibers. Russ. J. Plant Physl. 57, 328–341. doi: 10.1134/S1021443710030040
Goudenhooft, C., Bourmaud, A., and Baley, C. (2019a). Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) fibers for composite reinforcement: exploring the link between plant growth, cell walls development, and fiber properties. Front. Plant Sci. 10:411. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00411
Goudenhooft, C., Bourmaud, A., and Baley, C. (2019b). Study of plant gravitropic response: exploring the influence of lodging and recovery on the mechanical performances of flax fibers. Ind. Crops Prod. 128, 235–238. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.024
Goudenhooft, C., Siniscalco, D., Arnould, O., Bourmaud, A., Sire, O., Gorshkova, T., et al. (2018). Investigation of the mechanical properties of flax cell walls during plant development: the relation between performance and cell wall structure. Fibers 6:6. doi: 10.3390/fib6010006
Gritsch, C., Wan, Y. F., Mitchell, R. A. C., Shewry, P. R., Hanley, S. J., and Karp, A. (2015). G-fibre cell wall development in willow stems during tension wood induction. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 6447–6459. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv358
Guedes, F. T. P., Laurans, F., Quemener, B., Assor, C., Laine-Prade, V., Boizot, N., et al. (2017). Non-cellulosic polysaccharide distribution during G-layer formation in poplar tension wood fibers: abundance of rhamnogalacturonan I and arabinogalactan proteins but no evidence of xyloglucan. Planta 246, 857–878. doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2737-1
Guerriero, G., Behr, M., Legay, S., Mangeot-Peter, L., Zorzan, S., Ghoniem, M., et al. (2017). Transcriptomic profiling of hemp bast fibres at different developmental stages. Sci. Rep. 7:4961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05200-8
Ibragimova, N., Mokshina, N., Ageeva, M., Gurjanov, O., and Mikshina, P. (2020). Rearrangement of the cellulose-enriched cell wall in flax phloem fibers over the course of the gravitropic reaction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:5322. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155322
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A., and Jermiin, L. S. (2017). ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589. doi: 10.1038/Nmeth.4285
Lafarguette, F., Leple, J. C., Dejardin, A., Laurans, F., Costa, G., Lesage-Descauses, M. C., et al. (2004). Poplar genes encoding fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins are highly expressed in tension wood. New Phytol. 164, 107–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01175.x
Liwanag, A. J. M., Ebert, B., Verhertbruggen, Y., Rennie, E. A., Rautengarten, C., Oikawa, A., et al. (2012). Pectin biosynthesis: GALS1 in Arabidopsis thaliana is a beta-1,4-galactan beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase. Plant Cell 24, 5024–5036. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.106625
Love, G. D., Snape, C. E., Jarvis, M. C., and Morrison, I. M. (1994). Determination of phenolic structures in flax fiber by solid-state C-13 NMR. Phytochemistry 35, 489–491. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)94788-5
Madeira, F., Park, Y. M., Lee, J., Buso, N., Gur, T., Madhusoodanan, N., et al. (2019). The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W636–W641. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz268
Meloche, C. G., Knox, J. P., and Vaughn, K. C. (2007). A cortical band of gelatinous fibers causes the coiling of redvine tendrils: a model based upon cytochemical and immunocytochemical studies. Planta 225, 485–498. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0363-4
Mikshina, P., Chernova, T., Chemikosova, S., Ibragimova, N., Mokshina, N., and Gorshkova, T. (2013). “Cellulosic fibers: role of matrix polysaccharides in structure and function,” in Cellulose - Fundamental Aspects, eds T. van de Ven and L. Godbout (London: IntechOpen), 91–112. doi: 10.5772/51941
Mitchell, A. L., Attwood, T. K., Babbitt, P. C., Blum, M., Bork, P., Bridge, A., et al. (2019). InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D351–D360. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1100
Mizrachi, E., Maloney, V. J., Silberbauer, J., Hefer, C. A., Berger, D. K., Mansfield, S. D., et al. (2015). Investigating the molecular underpinnings underlying morphology and changes in carbon partitioning during tension wood formation in Eucalyptus. New Phytol. 206, 1351–1363. doi: 10.1111/nph.13152
Mokshina, N., Chernova, T., Galinousky, D., Gorshkov, O., and Gorshkova, T. (2018). Key stages of fiber development as determinants of bast fiber yield and quality. Fibers 6:20. doi: 10.3390/fib6020020
Mokshina, N., Gorshkov, O., Galinousky, D., and Gorshkova, T. (2020). Genes with bast fiber-specific expression in flax plants - Molecular keys for targeted fiber crop improvement. Ind. Crops Prod. 152:112549. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112549
Mokshina, N., Gorshkov, O., Ibragimova, N., Chernova, T., and Gorshkova, T. (2017). Cellulosic fibres of flax recruit both primary and secondary cell wall cellulose synthases during deposition of thick tertiary cell walls and in the course of graviresponse. Funct. Plant Biol. 44, 820–831. doi: 10.1071/Fp17105
Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A., and Minh, B. Q. (2015). IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300
Norberg, P. H., and Meier, H. (1966). Physical and chemical properties of the gelatinous layer in tension wood fibres of aspen (Populus tremula L.). Holzforschung 20, 174–178. doi: 10.1515/hfsg.1918.104.22.168
Patten, A. M., Jourdes, M., Brown, E. E., Laborie, M. P., Davin, L. B., and Lewis, N. G. (2007). Reaction tissue formation and stem tensile modulus properties in wild-type and p-coumarate-3-hydroxylase downregulated lines of alfalfa, Medicago sativa (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 94, 912–925. doi: 10.3732/ajb.94.6.912
Paux, E., Carocha, V., Marques, C., de Sousa, A. M., Borralho, N., Sivadon, P., et al. (2005). Transcript profiling of Eucalyptus xylem genes during tension wood formation. New Phytol. 167, 89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01396.x
Pertea, M., Kim, D., Pertea, G. M., Leek, J. T., and Salzberg, S. L. (2016). Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Prot. 11, 1650–1667. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095
Roach, M. J., and Deyholos, M. K. (2007). Microarray analysis of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) stems identifies transcripts enriched in fibre-bearing phloem tissues. Mol. Genet. Genom. 278, 149–165. doi: 10.1007/s00438-007-0241-1
Roussel, J. R., and Clair, B. (2015). Evidence of the late lignification of the G-layer in Simarouba tension wood, to assist understanding how non-G-layer species produce tensile stress. Tree Physiol. 35, 1366–1377. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv082
Schreiber, N., Gierlinger, N., Putz, N., Fratzl, P., Neinhuis, C., and Burgert, I. (2010). G-fibres in storage roots of Trifolium pratense (Fabaceae): tensile stress generators for contraction. Plant J. 61, 854–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04115.x
SEQC/MAQC-III Consortium (2014). A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the sequencing quality control consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 903–914. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2957
Takenaka, Y., Kato, K., Ogawa-Ohnishi, M., Tsuruhama, K., Kajiura, H., Yagyu, K., et al. (2018). Pectin RG-I rhamnosyltransferases represent a novel plant-specific glycosyltransferase family. Nat. Plants 4, 669–676. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0217-7
Wachananawat, B., Kuroha, T., Takenaka, Y., Kajiura, H., Naramoto, S., Yokoyama, R., et al. (2020). Diversity of pectin rhamnogalacturonan I rhamnosyltransferases in glycosyltransferase family 106. Front. Plant Sci. 11:997. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00997
Wang, Z. W., Hobson, N., Galindo, L., Zhu, S. L., Shi, D. H., McDill, J., et al. (2012). The genome of flax (Linum usitatissimum) assembled de novo from short shotgun sequence reads. Plant J. 72, 461–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05093.x
Wyatt, S. E., Sederoff, R., Flaishman, M. A., and Lev-Yadun, S. (2010). Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for gelatinous fiber formation. Russ. J. Plant Phys. 57, 363–367. doi: 10.1134/S1021443710030076
Xie, J. Y., Li, J. Q., Jie, Y. C., Xie, D. Y., Yang, D., Shi, H. Z., et al. (2020). Comparative transcriptomics of stem bark reveals genes associated with bast fiber development in Boehmeria nivea L. gaud (ramie). BMC Genom. 21:40. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6457-8
Zeng, W., Jiang, N., Nadella, R., Killen, T. L., Nadella, V., and Faik, A. (2010). A Glucurono(arabino)xylan synthase complex from wheat contains members of the GT43, GT47, and GT75 families and functions cooperatively. Plant Physiol. 154, 78–97. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.159749
Keywords: flax fibers, gravitropic response, atomic force microscopy, biomechanical properties, tertiary cell wall, transcriptome, rhamnogalacturonan I, rhamnosyltransferases
Citation: Petrova A, Kozlova L, Gorshkov O, Nazipova A, Ageeva M and Gorshkova T (2021) Cell Wall Layer Induced in Xylem Fibers of Flax Upon Gravistimulation Is Similar to Constitutively Formed Cell Walls of Bast Fibers. Front. Plant Sci. 12:660375. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.660375
Received: 29 January 2021; Accepted: 03 March 2021;
Published: 06 April 2021.
Edited by:Peter Ulvskov, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Reviewed by:Rozenn Le Hir, INRA UMR 1318 Institut Jean Pierre Bourgin, France
Jordi Petit Pedró, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain
Copyright © 2021 Petrova, Kozlova, Gorshkov, Nazipova, Ageeva and Gorshkova. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Liudmila Kozlova, email@example.com